nuclear family essay writing

Essay on My Nuclear Family

Students are often asked to write an essay on My Nuclear Family in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on My Nuclear Family

What is a nuclear family.

A nuclear family is a small family unit. It usually includes a mother, a father, and their children. This is the most common kind of family in many places. In my own nuclear family, there are four people: my parents, my younger brother, and me.

Life in My Nuclear Family

We spend a lot of time together. Every morning, we eat breakfast as a family. After school, my brother and I do our homework while our parents work. In the evening, we share stories at dinner. Weekends are for family outings or watching movies.

Roles in My Family

Each person has a role. My father goes to work to earn money. My mother takes care of the house and helps us with schoolwork. My brother and I go to school and help with chores. Together, we make our family strong.

Love and Support

The best thing about my family is the love and support we give each other. If one person is sad or has a problem, we all try to help. This love makes my nuclear family a wonderful place to grow up.

250 Words Essay on My Nuclear Family

Introduction to my family.

My family is small and sweet, consisting of four members. We are a nuclear family, which means it’s just my parents, my younger sister, and me. We live together in a cozy house filled with love and laughter.

My dad works in an office, and my mom is a teacher. They both love their jobs and work hard to take care of us. Dad is funny and always makes us giggle, while mom is gentle and helps us with our homework. They teach us good manners and the importance of kindness.

My Sister and Me

My sister is in grade school, and I am a few years older. We go to the same school and play together after we finish our studies. She likes drawing, and I enjoy playing soccer. Even though we have different hobbies, we share our toys and have fun together.

Spending Time Together

We enjoy family time a lot. Every evening, we eat dinner together and talk about our day. On weekends, we sometimes go to the park or watch a movie. These moments are special because we create happy memories.

My nuclear family may be small, but the love we share is huge. We support each other in tough times and celebrate together in happy times. I feel lucky to have such a wonderful family.

500 Words Essay on My Nuclear Family

My family is a small group of people who live together, care for each other, and share a strong bond. This type of family is often called a nuclear family and it includes my father, my mother, my younger brother, and me. Each member of my family plays a special role and together, we make a happy team.

My Father: The Pillar of Strength

My father is the strongest person I know. He goes to work every day to make sure we have everything we need, like food, clothes, and a house to live in. When he comes home, he often helps me with my homework and plays games with us. He teaches me to be brave and honest, and he is always there to support us when we are scared or sad.

My Mother: The Heart of Our Home

My mother is the one who makes our house feel like a home. She cooks delicious meals, helps us get ready for school, and gives the best hugs. She listens to our problems and is always ready with advice or a kind word to cheer us up. Her love and care make every day brighter.

My Younger Brother: My Playmate

My younger brother is my best friend and playmate. We share toys, play games, and sometimes argue, but we always make up quickly. He looks up to me, and I try to set a good example for him. We learn from each other and have fun exploring the world together.

Our Daily Life

Every day in our family is filled with routines and little traditions. We eat breakfast together, talk about our plans for the day, and then head to school or work. In the evening, we share our day’s experiences at dinner and often watch a show or read books together before bedtime. These moments are simple, but they are very important to us.

Weekends and Holidays

Weekends and holidays are special times for us. We often go on trips to the park, visit relatives, or try new activities. These are the times when we create memories that last forever. We celebrate birthdays, festivals, and achievements together, which brings us even closer as a family.

Challenges and Support

Like any family, we face challenges too. Sometimes we get sick, have tough days at work or school, or disagree with each other. But the great thing about my family is that we always support each other. We talk about our problems and find ways to solve them together. This makes us strong and helps us overcome any obstacle.

Conclusion: The Love in My Family

In conclusion, my nuclear family is a small world of love, laughter, and support. My father, mother, brother, and I may be just four people, but together, we have a huge amount of love and happiness. We care for each other through good times and bad, and I feel lucky to be a part of such a wonderful family. It’s like a team where everyone plays their part, and together, we make life beautiful.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Pregnancy
• Essay on My Own Philosophy Of Education
• Essay on My Parents My Hero

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Essay on Nuclear Family

Family is regarded as the basic unit of society. It consists of a father, mother, grandparents and children all living together under one roof. Family forms an essential part of our life. It is the first institution of the children and thus inculcates the moral values in them so that they may grow up to become good citizens of the society. There is the existence of several types of families in the society like Joint family, Nuclear family, single-parent family, etc. Every type of family has its own merits and demerits.

10 Lines Essay on Nuclear Family

1) A nuclear family is one which consists of a mother, father and their children.

2) Nuclear family is a small family, also referred to as a conjugal or elementary family.

3) The concept of the nuclear family originated from England in 13 th century.

4) A nuclear family consists of only two generations.

5) The trend of nuclear families gained popularity in the 20 th century.

6) In a nuclear family, all the members are free to make their own decisions.

7) Privacy of members is well protected in this type of family.

8) However, children are deprived of the love of their grandparents.

9) Nuclear families are free from unnecessary quarrels and disagreements.

10) Urbanization and modernization are the main causes of increase in nuclear families.

Long Essay on Nuclear Family in English

These days the concept of the nuclear family is rising in society and so I have elaborated a long essay on the merits and demerits of the nuclear family. I hope that it might be an aid to students of all classes i.e. 1-12th in writing an essay, assignment, and project on this topic.

1800 Words Essay – Essentials, Merits and Demerits of Nuclear Family

Introduction

We cannot imagine our life without our families. It is the one that makes us feel secure, helps us in making decisions during difficulties and celebrates our joy and festivals. Many of us might be a part of extended families while many of us would belong to nuclear families. India is a nation where a joint family system has been common but nowadays it is being replaced by the concept of the nuclear family in most of the urban areas. We will be discussing below the concept of the nuclear family, its rising trend in India and its advantages and disadvantages.

What is meant by a Nuclear Family?

The nuclear family is stated as a small family that consists of father, mother, and children. It is also called an elementary family or conjugal family. The number of people in the nuclear family is very less as compared to the number of members of a joint family. The children after marriage leave their families and settle with their wife and children. In other words, a married couple with their biological children or adopted children lives together as a small family called a nuclear family. 

In a nuclear family, mother and father are only the head of the family. These families do not have any elder members like that of extended families. Thus the married couples are free to make decisions according to their own will. They live an independent life with any number of children.

Concept of Nuclear Family

The concept of the nuclear family is considered to have originated in the 13th century in England. This concept emerged in England after proto-industrialization. There was no concept of extended families having people of many generations living together. They adopted the concept of shifting into single families after marriage.

However, the term and trend of the nuclear family became popular in the 20th century. This family structure trend became more popular in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s. Later the trend of nuclear families started decreasing in America and people shifted to other types of family structures.

The Reason for calling it a “Nuclear Family”

The term nuclear family came into existence in the 20th century. Some sources state that the term originated in 1924 and 1925. This age was termed as the atomic age and thus the term nuclear has its connection with the noun ‘Nucleus’. The term nucleus means the core or center of something. Therefore, in the same context, a nuclear family means a family whose all members are part of one common core. This gives it the name nuclear family.

The Framework of the Nuclear Families

Nuclear family, unlike joint families, consists of members of two generations i.e. the one in which they are born and the second in which they marry. The other generation is not possible until and unless they marry their children in some other families. The nuclear family is basically formed of two types of nuclear families to exist in one single family.

• Family of Orientation- The family in which an individual is born and raised.
• Family of Procreation- The family formed after the individuals are married to a girl or boy who    belongs to another family.

Rising of the Concept of Nuclear Family in India

A nuclear family is a very simple structured family that consists of a small number of people as compared to the Joint family.  The term family when discussed in India it commonly refers to the Traditional or Joint family. The joint family has been a part of Indian culture and tradition from ancient times. Nowadays, the trend of nuclear families is rising in the urban areas of India.

This is happening at a fast pace in the cities. The children do not want to live under the supervision of their elders after their marriage. They want to live an independent life with full privacy and without any type of disturbance. The factors like modernization and urbanization are promoting the people to practice the concept of nuclear families in the cities rather than being a part of traditional families.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Family

There are several types of family structures prevalent in society and the nuclear family is one among them. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear family enlisted below:

• Freedom to Make Decisions- The members of a nuclear family are free to make any decision they want. They can decide everything by themselves without any interference of their elders. This is not possible in a joint family as there are elder members in the family and they advise the younger ones in their decision-making.
• Development of Good Attributes- The development of different attributes in the children happens in a better way in nuclear families. Thus, this contributes to the good personality development of the children. Moreover, the children in nuclear families are close to their parents and thus can discuss every problem they are facing in an easier way.
• Improved Status of Women- The women in the nuclear families get more time to after themselves and their children. They are not under pressure to work according to the elders of the family. They are free to do whatever they want. Husbands and wives get quality time to spend with each other in nuclear families that are not possible every time in joint families.
• Loving and Peaceful Atmosphere- There are fewer members in a nuclear family than an extended family. Nuclear families with fewer people have very less chances of misunderstanding and conflicts. There is the existence of peace and harmony among the members and that is essential for living a happy family life.
• Sole Responsibilities- The responsibilities in a nuclear family are on the parents, unlike the joint family. The parents are individually responsible for the income and every need of the children as they are only the head of the family.
• Savings and Family Planning is Possible- The income of the house in the nuclear families is not shared among all like the joint families. It is safe in the hands of the parents and they can save it for the future of their children. Moreover, the number of children in nuclear families is limited as the parents can opt for family planning.

Disadvantages

• Children are Devoid of Love from their Grandparents- The children in nuclear families are not able to get the love and affection of their grandparents. Children living in joint families are well-mannered and know well to tackle several difficulties easily.
• No Elders to Guide in Difficulties- The nuclear families lack elders and experienced people and thus there is no one to guide the members during the time of difficulty. The parents themselves have to make decisions about everything and that is very difficult sometimes.
• Financial Loss- The breaking of joint families in the nuclear families results in the division of property or land into different small parts. Every brother gets a small piece of land and thus the yield is also reduced. They have to employ laborers for carrying out all the agricultural work and thus paying for the same is a kind of financial loss.
• Insecurity in Children- The children in nuclear families are devoid of love and care of their parents if both mother and father are working. They are raised and fed by the maids in the houses. This lack of love and time by the parents inculcates the feeling of insecurity and loneliness in the children. This causes many of them to be addicted to bad habits also.
• Lack of Moral and Social Values- The children in the nuclear family many times lack social attributes and become undisciplined. They become habitual of living in freedom and do not like mixing with other family members.
• Widows are Neglected- The widows in nuclear families do not get proper attention and care and they feel as if they are neglected. The children in such cases feel socially and emotionally insecure. This is not the case of widows in joint families. The widow gets good support from the other members of the family and thus forgets every pain gradually and starts living a normal life.

Nuclear Family v/s Joint Family

A joint family is one that consists of people up to three generations living together under the same roof while a nuclear family in contrast is small and simple with very only mother, father and children. There is the existence of mainly two types of family structures in India namely joint and nuclear families. The joint family also referred to as the traditional family has been in existence since ancient times in India. Earlier the people in India were confined to the villages and they were involved in the occupation of agriculture. Thus, they preferred to live together and the male members of the family were involved in the same family business. The concept of the nuclear family is however not a new concept but the structure of this kind of family was more prevalent in the western culture. It has become common in India at present because of modernization and changes in the lifestyle of people.

Is Nuclear Family A Perfect Family?

Every type of family structure present in society has its own benefits and drawbacks. Some of us desire to be a part of a nuclear family while others are a joint family and alternatives. It is wrong to say that the nuclear family is a perfect family. It depends upon the individual what he or she desires. There are conflicts, love, problems, etc in every type of family. It is we the members of the family who make the atmosphere of the family a peaceful and loving one.

According to me, both joint and nuclear families are good structures of families in society. I have always been a part of a nuclear family so I have a habit to dwell in the nuclear family but I had always felt the absence of my grandparents and other relatives too. The enjoyment of any type of celebration or festival in joint families is very interesting rather than the nuclear families. Therefore, being a part of the nuclear family I always have missed the warmth and love of a joint family. We can be part of nuclear families but remain in touch with our other family members and develop the habit of visiting our grandparents at a fixed interval of time.

The type of family that we desire to have is our individual choice. The nuclear family trend is rising but the importance of joint families is always felt. The love and care of different members in the joint family is really amazing. Moreover, the presence of grandparents in the joint families is a boon for the children as they teach them good values and morals. Children are also very close to their grandparents because of the love and affection they receive from them.

I hope this information would be helpful for you to know about the merits and demerits of Nuclear Family in a very convenient way.

FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions on Merits and Demerits of Nuclear Family

Ans. The word nuclear family came into existence in the thirteenth century.

Ans. The word family has been derived from the Latin word ‘Famulus’ that means servant.

Ans. The term ‘Nuclear family’ was coined by George P. Murdock, an anthropologist.

Ans. The love between the family members is stated as Storge(empathy bond).

Ans. Argentina is a country in the world that has the prevalent concept of nuclear families.

Related Posts

Essay on digital india, cashless india essay, essay on child is father of the man, essay on causes, effects and prevention of corona virus, essay on dr. sarvepalli radhakrishnan, durga puja essay, essay on summer vacation, essay on my plans for summer vacation, essay on holiday.

Is the Nuclear Family Means?

This essay about the nuclear family defines it as a household consisting typically of a heterosexual couple and their biological or adopted children. It discusses the historical rise of this family model during the mid-20th century, particularly in Western societies, influenced by economic and societal shifts post-World War II. The essay critiques the nuclear family for placing excessive pressures on parents and isolating them from extended community support. Additionally, it addresses the evolution of family structures, highlighting the diversity in modern family forms such as single-parent households, blended families, and same-sex couples with children. The text underscores that while the nuclear family has been idealized as a stable unit, contemporary society recognizes a variety of family models that reflect current economic conditions, social norms, and cultural values, demonstrating that family stability and support can come from various structures.

How it works

The term “nuclear family” commonly denotes a household comprising a heterosexual pair and their biological or adopted progeny. This archetype has historically represented the conventional familial arrangement, notably in Western cultures, and frequently emerges in media, literature, and policymaking as the quintessential family unit.

Historically, the concept of the nuclear family gained traction post-World War II and the ensuing economic upturn. During this epoch, societal norms and economic paradigms advocated for a familial structure wherein the father typically engaged in extramural labor, the mother oversaw domestic affairs, and their offspring were nurtured under their direct tutelage and guardianship.

This model was extolled for furnishing a secure and structured milieu for child-rearing, emblematic of moral and societal decorum.

Nevertheless, the nuclear family is neither a ubiquitous standard nor a stagnant institution. Its ascendancy is relatively modern when juxtaposed against the broader expanse of human history. Antecedent to the industrial era, extended family cohabitation—encompassing grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins sharing habitation and resources—prevailed and was frequently economically requisite. The transition to nuclear family living arrangements transpired concurrently with urbanization and industrial employment, fostering geographic mobility, with diminished accommodations for expansive extended families in burgeoning urban locales.

Despite its idealization, the nuclear family comprises merely one among manifold familial configurations and is not devoid of impediments. Detractors of the nuclear family model posit that it confers disproportionate burdens upon progenitors and estranges them from broader communal support networks. They highlight that this seclusion can engender considerable strain, as the obligations of childcare, education, and emotional sustenance primarily devolve upon a mere duo of adults. Moreover, economic exigencies, shifts in societal mores, and heightened divorce rates have engendered evolutionary changes in the nuclear family model, occasionally diminishing its prevalence.

In contemporary society, familial structures evince heightened diversity. Single-parent households, cohabiting couples sans progeny, blended families, and same-sex couples rearing offspring exemplify familial units that contravene the traditional confines of the nuclear family. Sociologists and scholars in family studies contend that these diverse configurations possess the potential to furnish the same stability and sustenance conventionally associated with nuclear families.

Furthermore, the escalating acknowledgment of diverse familial paradigms mirrors broader societal transitions towards inclusivity and validation of disparate cultural norms regarding family. Many non-Western societies accentuate extended familial bonds that play pivotal roles in nurturing and support, diverging significantly from the Western nuclear model.

In summation, while the nuclear family has historically been touted as the archetypal linchpin of societal frameworks in numerous regions, it neither reigns supreme nor necessarily represents the predominant form of family any longer. The metamorphosis of familial structures serves as a reflection of shifts in economic landscapes, societal norms, and cultural principles. Embracing the validity and merits of sundry familial configurations is imperative in addressing the genuine requisites of individuals and communities within a diverse and dynamic society.

Cite this page

Is The Nuclear Family Means?. (2024, Apr 29). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/is-the-nuclear-family-means/

"Is The Nuclear Family Means?." PapersOwl.com , 29 Apr 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/is-the-nuclear-family-means/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Is The Nuclear Family Means? . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/is-the-nuclear-family-means/ [Accessed: 6 May. 2024]

"Is The Nuclear Family Means?." PapersOwl.com, Apr 29, 2024. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/is-the-nuclear-family-means/

"Is The Nuclear Family Means?," PapersOwl.com , 29-Apr-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/is-the-nuclear-family-means/. [Accessed: 6-May-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Is The Nuclear Family Means? . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/is-the-nuclear-family-means/ [Accessed: 6-May-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake

The family structure we’ve held up as the cultural ideal for the past half century has been a catastrophe for many. It’s time to figure out better ways to live together.

T he scene is one many of us have somewhere in our family history: Dozens of people celebrating Thanksgiving or some other holiday around a makeshift stretch of family tables—siblings, cousins, aunts, uncles, great-aunts. The grandparents are telling the old family stories for the 37th time. “It was the most beautiful place you’ve ever seen in your life,” says one, remembering his first day in America. “There were lights everywhere … It was a celebration of light! I thought they were for me.”

The oldsters start squabbling about whose memory is better. “It was cold that day,” one says about some faraway memory. “What are you talking about? It was May, late May,” says another. The young children sit wide-eyed, absorbing family lore and trying to piece together the plotline of the generations.

After the meal, there are piles of plates in the sink, squads of children conspiring mischievously in the basement. Groups of young parents huddle in a hallway, making plans. The old men nap on couches, waiting for dessert. It’s the extended family in all its tangled, loving, exhausting glory.

This particular family is the one depicted in Barry Levinson’s 1990 film, Avalon , based on his own childhood in Baltimore. Five brothers came to America from Eastern Europe around the time of World War I and built a wallpaper business. For a while they did everything together, like in the old country. But as the movie goes along, the extended family begins to split apart. Some members move to the suburbs for more privacy and space. One leaves for a job in a different state. The big blowup comes over something that seems trivial but isn’t: The eldest of the brothers arrives late to a Thanksgiving dinner to find that the family has begun the meal without him.

“You cut the turkey without me?” he cries. “Your own flesh and blood! … You cut the turkey?” The pace of life is speeding up. Convenience, privacy, and mobility are more important than family loyalty. “The idea that they would eat before the brother arrived was a sign of disrespect,” Levinson told me recently when I asked him about that scene. “That was the real crack in the family. When you violate the protocol, the whole family structure begins to collapse.”

As the years go by in the movie, the extended family plays a smaller and smaller role. By the 1960s, there’s no extended family at Thanksgiving. It’s just a young father and mother and their son and daughter, eating turkey off trays in front of the television. In the final scene, the main character is living alone in a nursing home, wondering what happened. “In the end, you spend everything you’ve ever saved, sell everything you’ve ever owned, just to exist in a place like this.”

“In my childhood,” Levinson told me, “you’d gather around the grandparents and they would tell the family stories … Now individuals sit around the TV, watching other families’ stories.” The main theme of Avalon , he said, is “the decentralization of the family. And that has continued even further today. Once, families at least gathered around the television. Now each person has their own screen.”

This is the story of our times—the story of the family, once a dense cluster of many siblings and extended kin, fragmenting into ever smaller and more fragile forms. The initial result of that fragmentation, the nuclear family, didn’t seem so bad. But then, because the nuclear family is so brittle, the fragmentation continued. In many sectors of society, nuclear families fragmented into single-parent families, single-parent families into chaotic families or no families.

If you want to summarize the changes in family structure over the past century, the truest thing to say is this: We’ve made life freer for individuals and more unstable for families. We’ve made life better for adults but worse for children. We’ve moved from big, interconnected, and extended families, which helped protect the most vulnerable people in society from the shocks of life, to smaller, detached nuclear families (a married couple and their children), which give the most privileged people in society room to maximize their talents and expand their options. The shift from bigger and interconnected extended families to smaller and detached nuclear families ultimately led to a familial system that liberates the rich and ravages the working-class and the poor.

Annie Lowrey: The great affordability crisis breaking America

This article is about that process, and the devastation it has wrought—and about how Americans are now groping to build new kinds of family and find better ways to live.

The Era of Extended Clans

Through the early parts of American history, most people lived in what, by today’s standards, were big, sprawling households. In 1800, three-quarters of American workers were farmers. Most of the other quarter worked in small family businesses, like dry-goods stores. People needed a lot of labor to run these enterprises. It was not uncommon for married couples to have seven or eight children. In addition, there might be stray aunts, uncles, and cousins, as well as unrelated servants, apprentices, and farmhands. (On some southern farms, of course, enslaved African Americans were also an integral part of production and work life.)

Steven Ruggles, a professor of history and population studies at the University of Minnesota, calls these “corporate families”—social units organized around a family business. According to Ruggles, in 1800, 90 percent of American families were corporate families. Until 1850, roughly three-quarters of Americans older than 65 lived with their kids and grandkids. Nuclear families existed, but they were surrounded by extended or corporate families.

Read: What number of kids makes parents happiest?

Extended families have two great strengths. The first is resilience. An extended family is one or more families in a supporting web. Your spouse and children come first, but there are also cousins, in-laws, grandparents—a complex web of relationships among, say, seven, 10, or 20 people. If a mother dies, siblings, uncles, aunts, and grandparents are there to step in. If a relationship between a father and a child ruptures, others can fill the breach. Extended families have more people to share the unexpected burdens—when a kid gets sick in the middle of the day or when an adult unexpectedly loses a job.

A detached nuclear family, by contrast, is an intense set of relationships among, say, four people. If one relationship breaks, there are no shock absorbers. In a nuclear family, the end of the marriage means the end of the family as it was previously understood.

The second great strength of extended families is their socializing force. Multiple adults teach children right from wrong, how to behave toward others, how to be kind. Over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries, industrialization and cultural change began to threaten traditional ways of life. Many people in Britain and the United States doubled down on the extended family in order to create a moral haven in a heartless world. According to Ruggles, the prevalence of extended families living together roughly doubled from 1750 to 1900 , and this way of life was more common than at any time before or since.

During the Victorian era, the idea of “hearth and home” became a cultural ideal. The home “is a sacred place, a vestal temple, a temple of the hearth watched over by Household Gods, before whose faces none may come but those whom they can receive with love,” the great Victorian social critic John Ruskin wrote. This shift was led by the upper-middle class, which was coming to see the family less as an economic unit and more as an emotional and moral unit, a rectory for the formation of hearts and souls.

But while extended families have strengths, they can also be exhausting and stifling. They allow little privacy; you are forced to be in daily intimate contact with people you didn’t choose. There’s more stability but less mobility. Family bonds are thicker, but individual choice is diminished. You have less space to make your own way in life. In the Victorian era, families were patriarchal, favoring men in general and first-born sons in particular.

As factories opened in the big U.S. cities, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, young men and women left their extended families to chase the American dream. These young people married as soon as they could. A young man on a farm might wait until 26 to get married; in the lonely city, men married at 22 or 23. From 1890 to 1960, the average age of first marriage dropped by 3.6 years for men and 2.2 years for women.

From September 2019: Daniel Markovits on how life became an endless, terrible competition

The families they started were nuclear families. The decline of multigenerational cohabiting families exactly mirrors the decline in farm employment. Children were no longer raised to assume economic roles—they were raised so that at adolescence they could fly from the nest, become independent, and seek partners of their own. They were raised not for embeddedness but for autonomy. By the 1920s, the nuclear family with a male breadwinner had replaced the corporate family as the dominant family form. By 1960, 77.5 percent of all children were living with their two parents, who were married, and apart from their extended family.

The Short, Happy Life of the Nuclear Family

For a time, it all seemed to work. From 1950 to 1965, divorce rates dropped, fertility rates rose, and the American nuclear family seemed to be in wonderful shape. And most people seemed prosperous and happy. In these years, a kind of cult formed around this type of family—what McCall’s , the leading women’s magazine of the day, called “togetherness.” Healthy people lived in two-parent families. In a 1957 survey , more than half of the respondents said that unmarried people were “sick,” “immoral,” or “neurotic.”

During this period, a certain family ideal became engraved in our minds: a married couple with 2.5 kids. When we think of the American family, many of us still revert to this ideal. When we have debates about how to strengthen the family, we are thinking of the two-parent nuclear family, with one or two kids, probably living in some detached family home on some suburban street. We take it as the norm, even though this wasn’t the way most humans lived during the tens of thousands of years before 1950, and it isn’t the way most humans have lived during the 55 years since 1965.

Today, only a minority of American households are traditional two-parent nuclear families and only one-third of American individuals live in this kind of family. That 1950–65 window was not normal. It was a freakish historical moment when all of society conspired, wittingly and not, to obscure the essential fragility of the nuclear family.

For one thing, most women were relegated to the home. Many corporations, well into the mid-20th century, barred married women from employment: Companies would hire single women, but if those women got married, they would have to quit. Demeaning and disempowering treatment of women was rampant. Women spent enormous numbers of hours trapped inside the home under the headship of their husband, raising children.

For another thing, nuclear families in this era were much more connected to other nuclear families than they are today—constituting a “ modified extended family ,” as the sociologist Eugene Litwak calls it, “a coalition of nuclear families in a state of mutual dependence.” Even as late as the 1950s, before television and air-conditioning had fully caught on, people continued to live on one another’s front porches and were part of one another’s lives. Friends felt free to discipline one another’s children.

In his book The Lost City , the journalist Alan Ehrenhalt describes life in mid-century Chicago and its suburbs:

To be a young homeowner in a suburb like Elmhurst in the 1950s was to participate in a communal enterprise that only the most determined loner could escape: barbecues, coffee klatches, volleyball games, baby-sitting co-ops and constant bartering of household goods, child rearing by the nearest parents who happened to be around, neighbors wandering through the door at any hour without knocking—all these were devices by which young adults who had been set down in a wilderness of tract homes made a community. It was a life lived in public.

Finally, conditions in the wider society were ideal for family stability. The postwar period was a high-water mark of church attendance, unionization, social trust, and mass prosperity—all things that correlate with family cohesion. A man could relatively easily find a job that would allow him to be the breadwinner for a single-income family. By 1961, the median American man age 25 to 29 was earning nearly 400 percent more than his father had earned at about the same age.

In short, the period from 1950 to 1965 demonstrated that a stable society can be built around nuclear families—so long as women are relegated to the household, nuclear families are so intertwined that they are basically extended families by another name, and every economic and sociological condition in society is working together to support the institution.

Video: How the Nuclear Family Broke Down

Disintegration

But these conditions did not last. The constellation of forces that had briefly shored up the nuclear family began to fall away, and the sheltered family of the 1950s was supplanted by the stressed family of every decade since. Some of the strains were economic. Starting in the mid-’70s, young men’s wages declined, putting pressure on working-class families in particular. The major strains were cultural. Society became more individualistic and more self-oriented. People put greater value on privacy and autonomy. A rising feminist movement helped endow women with greater freedom to live and work as they chose.

Read: Gen-X women are caught in a generational tug-of-war

A study of women’s magazines by the sociologists Francesca Cancian and Steven L. Gordon found that from 1900 to 1979, themes of putting family before self dominated in the 1950s: “Love means self-sacrifice and compromise.” In the 1960s and ’70s, putting self before family was prominent: “Love means self-expression and individuality.” Men absorbed these cultural themes, too. The master trend in Baby Boomer culture generally was liberation—“Free Bird,” “Born to Run,” “Ramblin’ Man.”

Eli Finkel, a psychologist and marriage scholar at Northwestern University, has argued that since the 1960s, the dominant family culture has been the “self-expressive marriage.” “Americans,” he has written , “now look to marriage increasingly for self-discovery, self-esteem and personal growth.” Marriage, according to the sociologists Kathryn Edin and Maria Kefalas , “is no longer primarily about childbearing and childrearing. Now marriage is primarily about adult fulfillment.”

Read: An interview with Eli Finkel on how we expect too much from our romantic partners

This cultural shift was very good for some adults, but it was not so good for families generally. Fewer relatives are around in times of stress to help a couple work through them. If you married for love, staying together made less sense when the love died. This attenuation of marital ties may have begun during the late 1800s: The number of divorces increased about fifteenfold from 1870 to 1920, and then climbed more or less continuously through the first several decades of the nuclear-family era. As the intellectual historian Christopher Lasch noted in the late 1970s , the American family didn’t start coming apart in the 1960s; it had been “coming apart for more than 100 years.”

Americans today have less family than ever before. From 1970 to 2012, the share of households consisting of married couples with kids has been cut in half. In 1960, according to census data, just 13 percent of all households were single-person households. In 2018, that figure was 28 percent. In 1850, 75 percent of Americans older than 65 lived with relatives; by 1990, only 18 percent did.

Over the past two generations, people have spent less and less time in marriage—they are marrying later, if at all, and divorcing more. In 1950, 27 percent of marriages ended in divorce; today, about 45 percent do. In 1960, 72 percent of American adults were married. In 2017, nearly half of American adults were single. According to a 2014 report from the Urban Institute, roughly 90 percent of Baby Boomer women and 80 percent of Gen X women married by age 40, while only about 70 percent of late-Millennial women were expected to do so—the lowest rate in U.S. history. And while more than four-fifths of American adults in a 2019 Pew Research Center survey said that getting married is not essential to living a fulfilling life, it’s not just the institution of marriage they’re eschewing: In 2004, 33 percent of Americans ages 18 to 34 were living without a romantic partner, according to the General Social Survey; by 2018, that number was up to 51 percent.

Over the past two generations, families have also gotten a lot smaller. The general American birth rate is half of what it was in 1960. In 2012, most American family households had no children. There are more American homes with pets than with kids. In 1970, about 20 percent of households had five or more people. As of 2012, only 9.6 percent did.

Over the past two generations, the physical space separating nuclear families has widened. Before, sisters-in-law shouted greetings across the street at each other from their porches. Kids would dash from home to home and eat out of whoever’s fridge was closest by. But lawns have grown more expansive and porch life has declined, creating a buffer of space that separates the house and family from anyone else. As Mandy Len Catron recently noted in The Atlantic , married people are less likely to visit parents and siblings, and less inclined to help them do chores or offer emotional support. A code of family self-sufficiency prevails: Mom, Dad, and the kids are on their own, with a barrier around their island home.

Finally, over the past two generations, families have grown more unequal. America now has two entirely different family regimes. Among the highly educated, family patterns are almost as stable as they were in the 1950s; among the less fortunate, family life is often utter chaos. There’s a reason for that divide: Affluent people have the resources to effectively buy extended family, in order to shore themselves up. Think of all the child-rearing labor affluent parents now buy that used to be done by extended kin: babysitting, professional child care, tutoring, coaching, therapy, expensive after-school programs. (For that matter, think of how the affluent can hire therapists and life coaches for themselves, as replacement for kin or close friends.) These expensive tools and services not only support children’s development and help prepare them to compete in the meritocracy; by reducing stress and time commitments for parents, they preserve the amity of marriage. Affluent conservatives often pat themselves on the back for having stable nuclear families. They preach that everybody else should build stable families too. But then they ignore one of the main reasons their own families are stable: They can afford to purchase the support that extended family used to provide—and that the people they preach at, further down the income scale, cannot.

Read: ‘Intensive’ parenting is a strategy for an age of inequality

In 1970, the family structures of the rich and poor did not differ that greatly. Now there is a chasm between them. As of 2005, 85 percent of children born to upper-middle-class families were living with both biological parents when the mom was 40. Among working-class families, only 30 percent were. According to a 2012 report from the National Center for Health Statistics, college-educated women ages 22 to 44 have a 78 percent chance of having their first marriage last at least 20 years. Women in the same age range with a high-school degree or less have only about a 40 percent chance. Among Americans ages 18 to 55, only 26 percent of the poor and 39 percent of the working class are currently married. In her book Generation Unbound , Isabel Sawhill, an economist at the Brookings Institution, cited research indicating that differences in family structure have “increased income inequality by 25 percent.” If the U.S. returned to the marriage rates of 1970, child poverty would be 20 percent lower. As Andrew Cherlin, a sociologist at Johns Hopkins University, once put it, “It is the privileged Americans who are marrying, and marrying helps them stay privileged.”

When you put everything together, we’re likely living through the most rapid change in family structure in human history. The causes are economic, cultural, and institutional all at once. People who grow up in a nuclear family tend to have a more individualistic mind-set than people who grow up in a multigenerational extended clan. People with an individualistic mind-set tend to be less willing to sacrifice self for the sake of the family, and the result is more family disruption. People who grow up in disrupted families have more trouble getting the education they need to have prosperous careers. People who don’t have prosperous careers have trouble building stable families, because of financial challenges and other stressors. The children in those families become more isolated and more traumatized.

Read: The working-to-afford-child-care conundrum

Many people growing up in this era have no secure base from which to launch themselves and no well-defined pathway to adulthood. For those who have the human capital to explore, fall down, and have their fall cushioned, that means great freedom and opportunity—and for those who lack those resources, it tends to mean great confusion, drift, and pain.

Over the past 50 years, federal and state governments have tried to mitigate the deleterious effects of these trends. They’ve tried to increase marriage rates, push down divorce rates, boost fertility, and all the rest. The focus has always been on strengthening the nuclear family, not the extended family. Occasionally, a discrete program will yield some positive results, but the widening of family inequality continues unabated.

The people who suffer the most from the decline in family support are the vulnerable—especially children. In 1960, roughly 5 percent of children were born to unmarried women. Now about 40 percent are. The Pew Research Center reported that 11 percent of children lived apart from their father in 1960. In 2010, 27 percent did. Now about half of American children will spend their childhood with both biological parents. Twenty percent of young adults have no contact at all with their father (though in some cases that’s because the father is deceased). American children are more likely to live in a single-parent household than children from any other country.

Read: The divorce gap

We all know stable and loving single-parent families. But on average, children of single parents or unmarried cohabiting parents tend to have worse health outcomes, worse mental-health outcomes, less academic success, more behavioral problems, and higher truancy rates than do children living with their two married biological parents. According to work by Richard V. Reeves , a co-director of the Center on Children and Families at the Brookings Institution, if you are born into poverty and raised by your married parents, you have an 80 percent chance of climbing out of it. If you are born into poverty and raised by an unmarried mother, you have a 50 percent chance of remaining stuck.

It’s not just the lack of relationships that hurts children; it’s the churn. According to a 2003 study that Andrew Cherlin cites , 12 percent of American kids had lived in at least three “parental partnerships” before they turned 15. The transition moments, when mom’s old partner moves out or her new partner moves in, are the hardest on kids, Cherlin shows.

While children are the vulnerable group most obviously affected by recent changes in family structure, they are not the only one.

Consider single men. Extended families provided men with the fortifying influences of male bonding and female companionship. Today many American males spend the first 20 years of their life without a father and the next 15 without a spouse. Kay Hymowitz of the Manhattan Institute has spent a good chunk of her career examining the wreckage caused by the decline of the American family , and cites evidence showing that, in the absence of the connection and meaning that family provides, unmarried men are less healthy—alcohol and drug abuse are common—earn less, and die sooner than married men.

For women, the nuclear-family structure imposes different pressures. Though women have benefited greatly from the loosening of traditional family structures—they have more freedom to choose the lives they want—many mothers who decide to raise their young children without extended family nearby find that they have chosen a lifestyle that is brutally hard and isolating. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that women still spend significantly more time on housework and child care than men do, according to recent data. Thus, the reality we see around us: stressed, tired mothers trying to balance work and parenting, and having to reschedule work when family life gets messy.

Read: The loneliness of early parenthood

Without extended families, older Americans have also suffered. According to the AARP, 35 percent of Americans over 45 say they are chronically lonely . Many older people are now “elder orphans,” with no close relatives or friends to take care of them. In 2015, The New York Times ran an article called “ The Lonely Death of George Bell ,” about a family-less 72-year-old man who died alone and rotted in his Queens apartment for so long that by the time police found him, his body was unrecognizable.

Finally, because groups that have endured greater levels of discrimination tend to have more fragile families, African Americans have suffered disproportionately in the era of the detached nuclear family. Nearly half of black families are led by an unmarried single woman, compared with less than one-sixth of white families. (The high rate of black incarceration guarantees a shortage of available men to be husbands or caretakers of children.) According to census data from 2010, 25 percent of black women over 35 have never been married, compared with 8 percent of white women. Two-thirds of African American children lived in single-parent families in 2018, compared with a quarter of white children. Black single-parent families are most concentrated in precisely those parts of the country in which slavery was most prevalent. Research by John Iceland, a professor of sociology and demography at Penn State, suggests that the differences between white and black family structure explain 30 percent of the affluence gap between the two groups.

In 2004, the journalist and urbanist Jane Jacobs published her final book , an assessment of North American society called Dark Age Ahead . At the core of her argument was the idea that families are “rigged to fail.” The structures that once supported the family no longer exist, she wrote. Jacobs was too pessimistic about many things, but for millions of people, the shift from big and/or extended families to detached nuclear families has indeed been a disaster.

As the social structures that support the family have decayed, the debate about it has taken on a mythical quality. Social conservatives insist that we can bring the nuclear family back. But the conditions that made for stable nuclear families in the 1950s are never returning. Conservatives have nothing to say to the kid whose dad has split, whose mom has had three other kids with different dads; “go live in a nuclear family” is really not relevant advice. If only a minority of households are traditional nuclear families, that means the majority are something else: single parents, never-married parents, blended families, grandparent-headed families, serial partnerships, and so on. Conservative ideas have not caught up with this reality.

Read: How politics in Trump’s America divides families

Progressives, meanwhile, still talk like self-expressive individualists of the 1970s: People should have the freedom to pick whatever family form works for them. And, of course, they should. But many of the new family forms do not work well for most people—and while progressive elites say that all family structures are fine, their own behavior suggests that they believe otherwise. As the sociologist W. Bradford Wilcox has pointed out, highly educated progressives may talk a tolerant game on family structure when speaking about society at large, but they have extremely strict expectations for their own families. When Wilcox asked his University of Virginia students if they thought having a child out of wedlock was wrong, 62 percent said it was not wrong. When he asked the students how their own parents would feel if they themselves had a child out of wedlock, 97 percent said their parents would “freak out.” In a recent survey by the Institute for Family Studies, college-educated Californians ages 18 to 50 were less likely than those who hadn’t graduated from college to say that having a baby out of wedlock is wrong. But they were more likely to say that personally they did not approve of having a baby out of wedlock.

In other words, while social conservatives have a philosophy of family life they can’t operationalize, because it no longer is relevant, progressives have no philosophy of family life at all, because they don’t want to seem judgmental. The sexual revolution has come and gone, and it’s left us with no governing norms of family life, no guiding values, no articulated ideals. On this most central issue, our shared culture often has nothing relevant to say—and so for decades things have been falling apart.

Read: Why is it hard for liberals to talk about ‘family values’?

The good news is that human beings adapt, even if politics are slow to do so. When one family form stops working, people cast about for something new—sometimes finding it in something very old.

Redefining Kinship

In the beginning was the band. For tens of thousands of years, people commonly lived in small bands of, say, 25 people, which linked up with perhaps 20 other bands to form a tribe. People in the band went out foraging for food and brought it back to share. They hunted together, fought wars together, made clothing for one another, looked after one another’s kids. In every realm of life, they relied on their extended family and wider kin.

Except they didn’t define kin the way we do today. We think of kin as those biologically related to us. But throughout most of human history, kinship was something you could create.

Anthropologists have been arguing for decades about what exactly kinship is. Studying traditional societies, they have found wide varieties of created kinship among different cultures. For the Ilongot people of the Philippines, people who migrated somewhere together are kin. For the New Guineans of the Nebilyer Valley, kinship is created by sharing grease —the life force found in mother’s milk or sweet potatoes. The Chuukese people in Micronesia have a saying: “My sibling from the same canoe”; if two people survive a dangerous trial at sea, then they become kin. On the Alaskan North Slope, the Inupiat name their children after dead people, and those children are considered members of their namesake’s family.

In other words, for vast stretches of human history people lived in extended families consisting of not just people they were related to but people they chose to cooperate with. An international research team recently did a genetic analysis of people who were buried together —and therefore presumably lived together—34,000 years ago in what is now Russia. They found that the people who were buried together were not closely related to one another. In a study of 32 present-day foraging societies , primary kin—parents, siblings, and children—usually made up less than 10 percent of a residential band. Extended families in traditional societies may or may not have been genetically close, but they were probably emotionally closer than most of us can imagine. In a beautiful essay on kinship, Marshall Sahlins, an anthropologist at the University of Chicago, says that kin in many such societies share a “mutuality of being.” The late religion scholar J. Prytz-Johansen wrote that kinship is experienced as an “inner solidarity” of souls. The late South African anthropologist Monica Wilson described kinsmen as “mystically dependent” on one another. Kinsmen belong to one another, Sahlins writes, because they see themselves as “members of one another.”

Back in the 17th and 18th centuries, when European Protestants came to North America, their relatively individualistic culture existed alongside Native Americans’ very communal culture. In his book Tribe , Sebastian Junger describes what happened next: While European settlers kept defecting to go live with Native American families, almost no Native Americans ever defected to go live with European families. Europeans occasionally captured Native Americans and forced them to come live with them. They taught them English and educated them in Western ways. But almost every time they were able, the indigenous Americans fled. European settlers were sometimes captured by Native Americans during wars and brought to live in Native communities. They rarely tried to run away. This bothered the Europeans. They had the superior civilization, so why were people voting with their feet to go live in another way?

When you read such accounts, you can’t help but wonder whether our civilization has somehow made a gigantic mistake.

We can’t go back, of course. Western individualists are no longer the kind of people who live in prehistoric bands. We may even no longer be the kind of people who were featured in the early scenes of Avalon . We value privacy and individual freedom too much.

Our culture is oddly stuck. We want stability and rootedness, but also mobility, dynamic capitalism, and the liberty to adopt the lifestyle we choose. We want close families, but not the legal, cultural, and sociological constraints that made them possible. We’ve seen the wreckage left behind by the collapse of the detached nuclear family. We’ve seen the rise of opioid addiction, of suicide, of depression, of inequality—all products, in part, of a family structure that is too fragile, and a society that is too detached, disconnected, and distrustful. And yet we can’t quite return to a more collective world. The words the historians Steven Mintz and Susan Kellogg wrote in 1988 are even truer today: “Many Americans are groping for a new paradigm of American family life, but in the meantime a profound sense of confusion and ambivalence reigns.”

From Nuclear Families to Forged Families

Yet recent signs suggest at least the possibility that a new family paradigm is emerging. Many of the statistics I’ve cited are dire. But they describe the past—what got us to where we are now. In reaction to family chaos, accumulating evidence suggests, the prioritization of family is beginning to make a comeback. Americans are experimenting with new forms of kinship and extended family in search of stability.

Usually behavior changes before we realize that a new cultural paradigm has emerged. Imagine hundreds of millions of tiny arrows. In times of social transformation, they shift direction—a few at first, and then a lot. Nobody notices for a while, but then eventually people begin to recognize that a new pattern, and a new set of values, has emerged.

That may be happening now—in part out of necessity but in part by choice. Since the 1970s, and especially since the 2008 recession, economic pressures have pushed Americans toward greater reliance on family. Starting around 2012, the share of children living with married parents began to inch up. And college students have more contact with their parents than they did a generation ago. We tend to deride this as helicopter parenting or a failure to launch, and it has its excesses. But the educational process is longer and more expensive these days, so it makes sense that young adults rely on their parents for longer than they used to.

In 1980, only 12 percent of Americans lived in multigenerational households. But the financial crisis of 2008 prompted a sharp rise in multigenerational homes. Today 20 percent of Americans— 64 million people, an all-time high —live in multigenerational homes.

The revival of the extended family has largely been driven by young adults moving back home. In 2014, 35 percent of American men ages 18 to 34 lived with their parents . In time this shift might show itself to be mostly healthy, impelled not just by economic necessity but by beneficent social impulses ; polling data suggest that many young people are already looking ahead to helping their parents in old age.

Another chunk of the revival is attributable to seniors moving in with their children. The percentage of seniors who live alone peaked around 1990. Now more than a fifth of Americans 65 and over live in multigenerational homes. This doesn’t count the large share of seniors who are moving to be close to their grandkids but not into the same household.

Immigrants and people of color—many of whom face greater economic and social stress—are more likely to live in extended-family households. More than 20 percent of Asians, black people, and Latinos live in multigenerational households, compared with 16 percent of white people. As America becomes more diverse, extended families are becoming more common.

African Americans have always relied on extended family more than white Americans do. “Despite the forces working to separate us—slavery, Jim Crow, forced migration, the prison system, gentrification—we have maintained an incredible commitment to each other,” Mia Birdsong, the author of the forthcoming book How We Show Up , told me recently. “The reality is, black families are expansive, fluid, and brilliantly rely on the support, knowledge, and capacity of ‘the village’ to take care of each other. Here’s an illustration: The white researcher/social worker/whatever sees a child moving between their mother’s house, their grandparents’ house, and their uncle’s house and sees that as ‘instability.’ But what’s actually happening is the family (extended and chosen) is leveraging all of its resources to raise that child.”

Read: Why black families struggle to build wealth

The black extended family survived even under slavery, and all the forced family separations that involved. Family was essential in the Jim Crow South and in the inner cities of the North, as a way to cope with the stresses of mass migration and limited opportunities, and with structural racism. But government policy sometimes made it more difficult for this family form to thrive. I began my career as a police reporter in Chicago, writing about public-housing projects like Cabrini-Green. Guided by social-science research, politicians tore down neighborhoods of rickety low-rise buildings—uprooting the complex webs of social connection those buildings supported, despite high rates of violence and crime—and put up big apartment buildings. The result was a horror: violent crime, gangs taking over the elevators, the erosion of family and neighborly life. Fortunately, those buildings have since been torn down themselves, replaced by mixed-income communities that are more amenable to the profusion of family forms.

The return of multigenerational living arrangements is already changing the built landscape. A 2016 survey by a real-estate consulting firm found that 44 percent of home buyers were looking for a home that would accommodate their elderly parents, and 42 percent wanted one that would accommodate their returning adult children. Home builders have responded by putting up houses that are what the construction firm Lennar calls “two homes under one roof.” These houses are carefully built so that family members can spend time together while also preserving their privacy. Many of these homes have a shared mudroom, laundry room, and common area. But the “in-law suite,” the place for aging parents, has its own entrance, kitchenette, and dining area. The “Millennial suite,” the place for boomeranging adult children, has its own driveway and entrance too. These developments, of course, cater to those who can afford houses in the first place—but they speak to a common realization: Family members of different generations need to do more to support one another.

The most interesting extended families are those that stretch across kinship lines. The past several years have seen the rise of new living arrangements that bring nonbiological kin into family or familylike relationships. On the website CoAbode , single mothers can find other single mothers interested in sharing a home. All across the country, you can find co-housing projects, in which groups of adults live as members of an extended family, with separate sleeping quarters and shared communal areas. Common , a real-estate-development company that launched in 2015, operates more than 25 co-housing communities, in six cities, where young singles can live this way. Common also recently teamed up with another developer, Tishman Speyer, to launch Kin , a co-housing community for young parents. Each young family has its own living quarters, but the facilities also have shared play spaces, child-care services, and family-oriented events and outings.

Read: The hot new Millennial housing trend is a repeat of the Middle Ages

These experiments, and others like them, suggest that while people still want flexibility and some privacy, they are casting about for more communal ways of living, guided by a still-developing set of values. At a co-housing community in Oakland, California, called Temescal Commons , the 23 members, ranging in age from 1 to 83, live in a complex with nine housing units. This is not some rich Bay Area hipster commune. The apartments are small, and the residents are middle- and working-class. They have a shared courtyard and a shared industrial-size kitchen where residents prepare a communal dinner on Thursday and Sunday nights. Upkeep is a shared responsibility. The adults babysit one another’s children, and members borrow sugar and milk from one another. The older parents counsel the younger ones. When members of this extended family have suffered bouts of unemployment or major health crises, the whole clan has rallied together.

Courtney E. Martin, a writer who focuses on how people are redefining the American dream, is a Temescal Commons resident. “I really love that our kids grow up with different versions of adulthood all around, especially different versions of masculinity,” she told me. “We consider all of our kids all of our kids.” Martin has a 3-year-old daughter, Stella, who has a special bond with a young man in his 20s that never would have taken root outside this extended-family structure. “Stella makes him laugh, and David feels awesome that this 3-year-old adores him,” Martin said. This is the kind of magic, she concluded, that wealth can’t buy. You can only have it through time and commitment, by joining an extended family. This kind of community would fall apart if residents moved in and out. But at least in this case, they don’t.

Read: The extended family of my two open adoptions

As Martin was talking, I was struck by one crucial difference between the old extended families like those in Avalon and the new ones of today: the role of women. The extended family in Avalon thrived because all the women in the family were locked in the kitchen, feeding 25 people at a time. In 2008, a team of American and Japanese researchers found that women in multigenerational households in Japan were at greater risk of heart disease than women living with spouses only, likely because of stress. But today’s extended-family living arrangements have much more diverse gender roles.

And yet in at least one respect, the new families Americans are forming would look familiar to our hunter-gatherer ancestors from eons ago. That’s because they are chosen families—they transcend traditional kinship lines.

The modern chosen-family movement came to prominence in San Francisco in the 1980s among gay men and lesbians, many of whom had become estranged from their biological families and had only one another for support in coping with the trauma of the AIDS crisis. In her book, Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship , the anthropologist Kath Weston writes, “The families I saw gay men and lesbians creating in the Bay Area tended to have extremely fluid boundaries, not unlike kinship organization among sectors of the African-American, American Indian, and white working class.”

She continues:

Like their heterosexual counterparts, most gay men and lesbians insisted that family members are people who are “there for you,” people you can count on emotionally and materially. “They take care of me,” said one man, “I take care of them.”

These groups are what Daniel Burns, a political scientist at the University of Dallas, calls “forged families.” Tragedy and suffering have pushed people together in a way that goes deeper than just a convenient living arrangement. They become, as the anthropologists say, “fictive kin.”

Over the past several decades, the decline of the nuclear family has created an epidemic of trauma—millions have been set adrift because what should have been the most loving and secure relationship in their life broke. Slowly, but with increasing frequency, these drifting individuals are coming together to create forged families. These forged families have a feeling of determined commitment. The members of your chosen family are the people who will show up for you no matter what. On Pinterest you can find placards to hang on the kitchen wall where forged families gather: “Family isn’t always blood. It’s the people in your life who want you in theirs; the ones who accept you for who you are. The ones who would do anything to see you smile & who love you no matter what.”

Two years ago , I started something called Weave: The Social Fabric Project . Weave exists to support and draw attention to people and organizations around the country who are building community. Over time, my colleagues and I have realized that one thing most of the Weavers have in common is this: They provide the kind of care to nonkin that many of us provide only to kin—the kind of support that used to be provided by the extended family.

Lisa Fitzpatrick, who was a health-care executive in New Orleans, is a Weaver . One day she was sitting in the passenger seat of a car when she noticed two young boys, 10 or 11, lifting something heavy. It was a gun. They used it to shoot her in the face. It was a gang-initiation ritual. When she recovered, she realized that she was just collateral damage. The real victims were the young boys who had to shoot somebody to get into a family, their gang.

She quit her job and began working with gang members. She opened her home to young kids who might otherwise join gangs. One Saturday afternoon, 35 kids were hanging around her house. She asked them why they were spending a lovely day at the home of a middle-aged woman. They replied, “You were the first person who ever opened the door.”

In Salt Lake City, an organization called the Other Side Academy provides serious felons with an extended family. Many of the men and women who are admitted into the program have been allowed to leave prison, where they were generally serving long sentences, but must live in a group home and work at shared businesses, a moving company and a thrift store. The goal is to transform the character of each family member. During the day they work as movers or cashiers. Then they dine together and gather several evenings a week for something called “Games”: They call one another out for any small moral failure—being sloppy with a move; not treating another family member with respect; being passive-aggressive, selfish, or avoidant.

Games is not polite. The residents scream at one another in order to break through the layers of armor that have built up in prison. Imagine two gigantic men covered in tattoos screaming “Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you!” At the session I attended, I thought they would come to blows. But after the anger, there’s a kind of closeness that didn’t exist before. Men and women who have never had a loving family suddenly have “relatives” who hold them accountable and demand a standard of moral excellence. Extreme integrity becomes a way of belonging to the clan. The Other Side Academy provides unwanted people with an opportunity to give care, and creates out of that care a ferocious forged family.

I could tell you hundreds of stories like this, about organizations that bring traumatized vets into extended-family settings, or nursing homes that house preschools so that senior citizens and young children can go through life together. In Baltimore, a nonprofit called Thread surrounds underperforming students with volunteers, some of whom are called “grandparents.” In Chicago, Becoming a Man helps disadvantaged youth form family-type bonds with one another. In Washington, D.C., I recently met a group of middle-aged female scientists—one a celebrated cellular biologist at the National Institutes of Health, another an astrophysicist—who live together in a Catholic lay community, pooling their resources and sharing their lives. The variety of forged families in America today is endless.

You may be part of a forged family yourself. I am. In 2015, I was invited to the house of a couple named Kathy and David, who had created an extended-family-like group in D.C. called All Our Kids , or AOK-DC. Some years earlier, Kathy and David had had a kid in D.C. Public Schools who had a friend named James, who often had nothing to eat and no place to stay, so they suggested that he stay with them. That kid had a friend in similar circumstances, and those friends had friends. By the time I joined them, roughly 25 kids were having dinner every Thursday night, and several of them were sleeping in the basement.

I joined the community and never left—they became my chosen family. We have dinner together on Thursday nights, celebrate holidays together, and vacation together. The kids call Kathy and David Mom and Dad. In the early days, the adults in our clan served as parental figures for the young people—replacing their broken cellphones, supporting them when depression struck, raising money for their college tuition. When a young woman in our group needed a new kidney, David gave her one of his.

We had our primary biological families, which came first, but we also had this family. Now the young people in this forged family are in their 20s and need us less. David and Kathy have left Washington, but they stay in constant contact. The dinners still happen. We still see one another and look after one another. The years of eating together and going through life together have created a bond. If a crisis hit anyone, we’d all show up. The experience has convinced me that everybody should have membership in a forged family with people completely unlike themselves.

Ever since I started working on this article, a chart has been haunting me . It plots the percentage of people living alone in a country against that nation’s GDP. There’s a strong correlation. Nations where a fifth of the people live alone, like Denmark and Finland, are a lot richer than nations where almost no one lives alone, like the ones in Latin America or Africa. Rich nations have smaller households than poor nations. The average German lives in a household with 2.7 people. The average Gambian lives in a household with 13.8 people.

That chart suggests two things, especially in the American context. First, the market wants us to live alone or with just a few people. That way we are mobile, unattached, and uncommitted, able to devote an enormous number of hours to our jobs. Second, when people who are raised in developed countries get money, they buy privacy.

For the privileged, this sort of works. The arrangement enables the affluent to dedicate more hours to work and email, unencumbered by family commitments. They can afford to hire people who will do the work that extended family used to do. But a lingering sadness lurks, an awareness that life is emotionally vacant when family and close friends aren’t physically present, when neighbors aren’t geographically or metaphorically close enough for you to lean on them, or for them to lean on you. Today’s crisis of connection flows from the impoverishment of family life.

I often ask African friends who have immigrated to America what most struck them when they arrived. Their answer is always a variation on a theme—the loneliness. It’s the empty suburban street in the middle of the day, maybe with a lone mother pushing a baby carriage on the sidewalk but nobody else around.

For those who are not privileged, the era of the isolated nuclear family has been a catastrophe. It’s led to broken families or no families; to merry-go-round families that leave children traumatized and isolated; to senior citizens dying alone in a room. All forms of inequality are cruel, but family inequality may be the cruelest. It damages the heart. Eventually family inequality even undermines the economy the nuclear family was meant to serve: Children who grow up in chaos have trouble becoming skilled, stable, and socially mobile employees later on.

Recommended Reading

The Gay Guide to Wedded Bliss

Family Reunions: Not Just for Grandparents

The Black Family in the Age of Mass Incarceration

When hyper-individualism kicked into gear in the 1960s, people experimented with new ways of living that embraced individualistic values. Today we are crawling out from the wreckage of that hyper-individualism—which left many families detached and unsupported—and people are experimenting with more connected ways of living, with new shapes and varieties of extended families. Government support can help nurture this experimentation, particularly for the working-class and the poor, with things like child tax credits, coaching programs to improve parenting skills in struggling families, subsidized early education, and expanded parental leave. While the most important shifts will be cultural, and driven by individual choices, family life is under so much social stress and economic pressure in the poorer reaches of American society that no recovery is likely without some government action.

The two-parent family, meanwhile, is not about to go extinct. For many people, especially those with financial and social resources, it is a great way to live and raise children. But a new and more communal ethos is emerging, one that is consistent with 21st-century reality and 21st-century values.

When we discuss the problems confronting the country, we don’t talk about family enough. It feels too judgmental. Too uncomfortable. Maybe even too religious. But the blunt fact is that the nuclear family has been crumbling in slow motion for decades, and many of our other problems—with education, mental health, addiction, the quality of the labor force—stem from that crumbling. We’ve left behind the nuclear-family paradigm of 1955. For most people it’s not coming back. Americans are hungering to live in extended and forged families, in ways that are new and ancient at the same time. This is a significant opportunity, a chance to thicken and broaden family relationships, a chance to allow more adults and children to live and grow under the loving gaze of a dozen pairs of eyes, and be caught, when they fall, by a dozen pairs of arms. For decades we have been eating at smaller and smaller tables, with fewer and fewer kin.

It’s time to find ways to bring back the big tables.

This article appears in the March 2020 print edition with the headline “The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake.” When you buy a book using a link on this page, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic .

ReviseSociology

A level sociology revision – education, families, research methods, crime and deviance and more!

Family essay plan – Modern nuclear family….

Last Updated on January 9, 2019 by Karl Thompson

Assess the view that the modern nuclear family is the most effective type of family unit in which to socialise children and stabilise adult personalities (24)

The above view is associated mainly with the Functionalist perspective , to an extent with the Marxist perspective, while Feminists tend to disagree.

George Murdock (1949) argued that that the nuclear family performs four essential functions to meet the needs of society and its members: The stable satisfaction of the sex drive – which prevents the social disruption cased by a ‘sexual free for all’; the reproduction of the next generation and thus the continuation of society over time; thirdly, the socialisation of the young into society’s shared norms and values and finally he argued the family provides for society’s economic needs by providing food and shelter.

Murdock thus agrees with the two statements in the question and goes further, arguing that the nuclear family performs even more functions. Furthermore, he argued that the nuclear family was universal, following his study of over 250 different societies.

Some sociologists, however, criticise Murdock’s view as being too rose tinted – pointing out that conflict and disharmony can occur both within nuclear families and within societies where the nuclear family is dominant. A second criticism is that the nuclear family is not universal – Gough studied the Nayr of South India and found that women and men had several sexual partners, but this type of matrifocal family was functional for that society.

A second Functionalist, Talcott Parsons  argued that the type of society affects the shape of the family – different societies require the family to perform different functions and so some types of family ‘fit in’ better with particular societies.

To illustrate this, Parsons argued that there were two basic types of society – modern industrial society and traditional pre-industrial society. He argued that the nuclear family fits the needs of industrial society and that the extended family fitted the needs of pre-industrial society. He argued that as society became industrialised, society had different needs, and that the nuclear family evolved to meet these needs. For example, one thing industrial society needed was a geographically mobile workforce – the nuclear family is appropriate here because it is more mobile than the extended family.

Parsons also argued that the family performs less functions with the move to industrialisation – as the health care and welfare functions come to be taken over by the state. However, the family becomes more specialised – and performs two ‘essential and irreducible functions’ – these are the two mentioned in the question – the primary socialisation of children is where we are first taught societies norms and values and learn to integrate with wider society and the stabilisation of adult personalities is where the family is the place of relaxation – the place to which one returns after a hard day of working to de – stress.

Parsons has, however been criticised, as with Murdock, for having a ‘rose tinted view’ – Feminists argue that women get an unfair deal in the traditional nuclear family, for example. A second criticism is that while he may have been right about the 1950s, when he was writing, the nuclear family seams less relevant in our post-modern age when many couples need dual incomes – meaning the nuclear family may be too small to effectively perform the two functions mentioned in the question.

The Marxist view of the family is that it does do what is stated in the question, but they criticise the Functionalist view, arguing that the family also performs functions for Capitalism. Firstly, they say it performs an ‘ideological function’ in that the family convinces children, through primary socialisation, that hierarchy is natural and inevitable. Secondly, they also see the family as acting as a unit of consumption – the family is seen by Capitalists as a something to make money out of – what with the pressure to ‘keep up with the Joneses and ‘pester power’

Thus, applying Marxism we learn that the Functionalist view is too optimistic – they see the Capitalist system as infiltrating family life, through advertising, for example, which creates conflict within the family, undermining its ability to harmoniously socialise children and stabilise adult personalities.

Finally, we come onto Feminist views of the family . Radical Feminists are especially critical of the view in the question. They argue, for example, that many nuclear families are characterised by domestic abuse and point to the rising divorce rates in recent years to suggest that the nuclear family is not necessarily the best type of family. Moreover, many Feminists have argued that the nuclear family and the traditional gender roles that go along with it has for too long performed an ideological function – this set up is projected as the norm in society, a norm which women have been under pressure to conform to and a  norm which serves to benefit men and oppress women – because women end up becoming dependent on men in their traditional roles – so they see the nuclear family as being the primary institution through which patriarchy is reproduced, again criticising the rather rose tinted view of the Functionalist perspective on the family.

So to conclude, while the statement in the question may have appeared to be the case in the 1950s, this no longer appears to be the case in British society today.

Share this:

• Share on Tumblr

2 thoughts on “Family essay plan – Modern nuclear family….”

MORE COULD BE SAID

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Discover more from ReviseSociology

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Top Streams

• Data Science Courses in USA
• Business Analytics Courses in USA
• Engineering Courses in USA
• Tax Courses in USA
• Healthcare Courses in USA
• Language Courses in USA
• Insurance Courses in USA
• Digital Marketing Courses in USA

Top Specialization

• Masters in Data Analytics in USA
• Masters in Mechanical Engineering in USA
• Masters in Supply Chain Management in USA
• Masters in Computer Science in USA
• MBA in Finance in USA
• Masters in Architecture in USA

Top Universities

• Cornell University
• Yale University
• Princeton University
• University of California Los Angeles
• University of Harvard
• Stanford University
• Arizona State University
• Northeastern University
• Project Management Courses in Australia
• Accounting Courses in Australia
• Medical Courses in Australia
• Psychology Courses in Australia
• Interior Designing Courses in Australia
• Pharmacy Courses in Australia
• Social Work Courses in Australia
• MBA in Australia
• Masters in Education in Australia
• Masters in Pharmacy in Australia
• Masters in Information Technology in Australia
• BBA in Australia
• Masters in Teaching in Australia
• Masters in Psychology in Australia
• University of Melbourne
• Deakin University
• Carnegie Mellon University
• Monash University
• University of Sydney
• University of Queensland
• RMIT University
• Macquarie University
• Data Science Courses in Canada
• Business Management Courses in Canada
• Supply Chain Management Courses in Canada
• Project Management Courses in Canada
• Business Analytics Courses in Canada
• Hotel Management Courses in Canada
• MBA in Canada
• MS in Canada
• Masters in Computer Science in Canada
• Masters in Management in Canada
• Masters in Psychology in Canada
• Masters in Education in Canada
• MBA in Finance in Canada
• Masters in Business Analytics in Canada
• University of Toronto
• University of British Columbia
• McGill University
• University of Alberta
• York University
• University of Calgary
• Algoma University
• University Canada West
• Project Management Courses in UK
• Data Science Courses in UK
• Public Health Courses in UK
• Digital Marketing Courses in UK
• Hotel Management Courses in UK
• Nursing Courses in UK
• Medicine Courses in UK
• Interior Designing Courses in UK
• Masters in Computer Science in UK
• Masters in Psychology in UK
• MBA in Finance in UK
• MBA in Healthcare Management in UK
• Masters in Education in UK
• Masters in Marketing in UK
• MBA in HR in UK
• University of Oxford
• University of Cambridge
• Coventry University
• University of East London
• University of Hertfordshire
• University of Birmingham
• Imperial College London
• University of Glasgow

Top Resources

• Universities in Germany
• Study in Germany
• Masters in Germany
• Courses in Germany
• Bachelors in Germany
• Germany Job Seeker Visa
• Cost of Living in Germany
• Best Universities in Germany

Top Courses

• Masters in Data Science in Germany
• MS in Computer Science in Germany
• Marine Engineering in Germany
• MS Courses in Germany
• Masters in Psychology in Germany
• Hotel Management Courses in Germany
• Masters in Economics in Germany
• Paramedical Courses in Germany
• Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
• University of Bonn
• University of Freiburg
• University of Hamburg
• University of Stuttgart
• Saarland University
• Mannheim University
• MBA in Ireland
• Phd in Ireland
• Masters in Computer Science Ireland
• Cyber Security in Ireland
• Masters in Data Analytics Ireland
• Ms in Data Science in Ireland
• Pharmacy courses in ireland
• Business Analytics Course in Ireland
• Universities in Ireland
• Study in Ireland
• Masters in Ireland
• Courses in Ireland
• Bachelors in Ireland
• Cost of Living in Ireland
• Ireland Student Visa
• Part Time Jobs in Ireland
• Trinity College Dublin
• University College Dublin
• Dublin City University
• University of Limerick
• Dublin Business School
• Maynooth University
• University College Cork
• National College of Ireland

Colleges & Courses

• Masters in France
• Phd in France
• Study Medicine in France
• Best Universities in Frankfurt
• Best Architecture Colleges in France
• ESIGELEC France
• Study in France for Indian Students
• Intakes in France
• SOP for France Visa
• Study in France from India
• Reasons to Study in France
• How to Settle in France

More About France

• Cost of Living in France
• France Study Visa
• Cost of Living in Frankfurt
• France Scholarship for Indian Students
• Part Time Jobs in France
• Stay Back in France After Masters

About Finland

• Universities in Finland
• Study in Finland
• Courses in Finland
• Bachelor Courses in Finland
• Masters Courses in Finland
• Cost of Living in Finland
• MS in Finland
• Average Fees in Finland Universities
• PhD in Finland
• Bachelor Degree in Medicine & Surgery
• MBBS Courses in Georgia
• MBBS Courses in Russia
• Alte University
• Caucasus University
• Georgian National University SEU
• David Tvildiani Medical University
• Caspian International School Of Medicine
• Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University
• Kyrgyz State Medical Academy
• Cremeia Federal University
• Bashkir State Medical University
• Kursk State Medical University
• Andijan State Medical Institute
• IELTS Syllabus
• IELTS Prepration
• IELTS Eligibility
• IELTS Test Format
• IELTS Band Descriptors
• IELTS Speaking test
• IELTS Writing Task 1
• IELTS score validity
• IELTS Cue Card

IELTS Reading Answers Sample

• Animal Camouflage
• Types Of Societies
• Australia Convict Colonies
• A Spark A Flint
• Emigration To The Us
• The History Of Salt
• Zoo Conservation Programmes
• The Robots Are Coming
• The Development Of Plastic

IELTS Speaking Cue Card Sample

• Describe A Puzzle You Have Played
• Describe A Long Walk You Ever Had
• Describe Your Favourite Movie
• Describe A Difficult Thing You did
• Describe A Businessman You Admire
• Memorable Day in My Life
• Describe Your Dream House
• Describe A Bag You Want to Own
• Describe a Famous Athlete You Know
• Aquatic Animal

IELTS Essay Sample Sample

• Best Education System
• IELTS Opinion Essay
• Agree or Disagree Essay
• Problem Solution Essays
• Essay on Space Exploration
• Essay On Historical Places
• Essay Writing Samples
• Tourism Essay
• Global Warming Essay
• GRE Exam Fees
• GRE Exam Syllabus
• GRE Exam Eligibility
• Sections in GRE Exam
• GRE Exam Benefits
• GRE Exam Results
• GRE Cutoff for US Universities
• GRE Preparation
• Send GRE scores to Universities

GRE Exam Study Material

• GRE Verbal Preparation
• GRE Study Material
• GRE AWA Essays
• GRE Sample Issue Essays
• Stanford University GRE Cutoff
• Harvard University GRE Cutoff
• GRE Quantitative Reasoning
• GRE Verbal Reasoning
• GRE Reading Comprehension
• Prepare for GRE in 2 months

Other Resources

• Documents Required For Gre Exam
• GRE Exam Duration
• GRE at Home
• GRE vs GMAT
• Improve GRE Verbal Scores

Free GRE Ebooks

• GRE Preparation Guide (Free PDF)
• GRE Syllabus (Free PDF)
• GMAT Eligibility
• GMAT Syllabus
• GMAT Exam Dates
• GMAT Registration
• GMAT Exam Fees
• GMAT Sections
• GMAT Purpose

GMAT Exam Study Material

• How to prepare for GMAT?
• GMAT Score Validity
• GMAT Preparation Books
• GMAT Preparation
• GMAT Exam Duration
• GMAT Score for Harvard
• GMAT Reading Comprehension
• GMAT Retake Strategy

Free GMAT Ebooks

• GMAT Guide PDF
• Download GMAT Syllabus PDF
• TOEFL Exam Registration
• TOEFL Exam Eligibility
• TOEFL Exam Pattern
• TOEFL Exam Preparation
• TOEFL Exam Tips
• TOEFL Exam Dates
• Documents for TOEFL Exam
• TOEFL Exam Fee

TOEFL Exam Study Material

• TOEFL Preparation Books
• TOEFL Speaking Section
• TOEFL Score and Results
• TOEFL Writing Section
• TOEFL Reading Section
• TOEFL Listening Section
• TOEFL Vocabulary
• Types of Essays in TOEFL

Free TOEFL Ebooks

• TOEFL Exam Guide (Free PDF)
• PTE Exam Dates
• PTE Exam Syllabus
• PTE Exam Eligibility Criteria
• PTE Test Centers in India
• PTE Exam Pattern
• PTE Exam Fees
• PTE Exam Duration
• PTE Exam Registration

PTE Exam Study Material

• PTE Exam Preparation
• PTE Speaking Test
• PTE Reading Test
• PTE Listening Test
• PTE Writing Test
• PTE Essay Writing
• PTE exam for Australia

Free PTE Ebooks

• PTE Syllabus (Free PDF)
• Duolingo Exam
• Duolingo Test Eligibility
• Duolingo Exam Pattern
• Duolingo Exam Fees
• Duolingo Test Validity
• Duolingo Syllabus
• Duolingo Preparation

Duolingo Exam Study Material

• Duolingo Exam Dates
• Duolingo Test Score
• Duolingo Test Results
• Duolingo Test Booking

Free Duolingo Ebooks

• Duolingo Guide (Free PDF)
• Duolingo Test Pattern (Free PDF)

NEET & MCAT Exam

• NEET Study Material
• NEET Preparation
• MCAT Eligibility
• MCAT Preparation

SAT & ACT Exam

• ACT Eligibility
• ACT Exam Dates
• SAT Syllabus
• SAT Exam Pattern
• SAT Exam Eligibility

USMLE & OET Exam

• USMLE Syllabus
• USMLE Preparation
• USMLE Step 1
• OET Syllabus
• OET Eligibility
• OET Prepration

PLAB & LSAT Exam

• PLAB Exam Syllabus
• PLAB Exam Fees
• LSAT Eligibility
• LSAT Registration
• TOEIC Result
• Study Guide

Application Process

• LOR for Masters
• SOP Samples for MS
• LOR for Phd
• SOP for Internship
• SOP for Phd
• Check Visa Status
• Motivation Letter Format
• Motivation Letter for Internship
• F1 Visa Documents Checklist

Career Prospects

• Popular Courses after Bcom in Abroad
• Part Time Jobs in Australia
• Part Time Jobs in USA
• Salary after MS in Germany
• Salary after MBA in Canada
• Average Salary in Singapore
• Higher Studies after MBA in Abroad
• Study in Canada after 12th

Trending Topics

• Best Education System in World
• Best Flying Schools in World
• Top Free Education Countries
• Best Countries to Migrate from India
• 1 Year PG Diploma Courses in Canada
• Canada Vs India
• Germany Post Study Work Visa
• Post Study Visa in USA
• Data Science Vs Data Analytics
• Public Vs Private Universities in Germany
• Universities Vs Colleges
• Difference Between GPA and CGPA
• Undergraduate Vs Graduate
• MBA in UK Vs MBA in USA
• Degree Vs Diploma in Canada
• IELTS vs TOEFL
• Duolingo English Test vs. IELTS
• Why Study in Canada
• Cost of Living in Canada
• Education System in Canada
• SOP for Canada
• Summer Intake in Canada
• Spring Intake in Canada
• Winter Intake in Canada
• Accommodation in Canada for Students
• Average Salary in Canada
• Fully Funded Scholarships in Canada
• Why Study in USA
• Cost of Studying in USA
• Spring Intake in USA
• Winter Intake in USA
• Summer Intake in USA
• STEM Courses in USA
• Scholarships for MS in USA
• Acceptable Study Gap in USA
• Interesting Facts about USA
• Free USA course
• Why Study in UK
• Cost of Living in UK
• Cost of Studying in UK
• Education System in UK
• Summer Intake in UK
• Spring Intake in UK
• Student Visa for UK
• Accommodation in UK for Students
• Scholarships in UK
• Why Study in Germany
• Cost of Studying in Germany
• Education System in Germany
• SOP for Germany
• Summer Intake in Germany
• Winter Intake in Germany
• Study Visa for Germany
• Accommodation in Germany for Students
• Free Education in Germany

Country Guides

• Study in UK
• Study in Canada
• Study in USA
• Study in Australia
• SOP Samples for Canada Student Visa
• US F1 Visa Guide for Aspirants

Exams Guides

• Duolingo Test Pattern

Recommended Reads

• Fully Funded Masters Guide
• SOP Samples For Australia
• Scholarships for Canada
• Data Science Guide
• SOP for MS in Computer Science
• Study Abroad Exams
• Alumni Connect
• Booster Program
• Scholarship

GPA CALCULATOR Convert percentage marks to GPA effortlessly with our calculator!

Expense calculator plan your study abroad expenses with our comprehensive calculator, ielts band calculator estimate your ielts band score with our accurate calculator, education loan calculator discover your eligible loan amount limit with our education calculator, university partner explore growth and opportunities with our university partnership, accommodation discover your perfect study abroad accommodation here, experience-center discover our offline centers for a personalized experience, our offices visit us for expert study abroad counseling..

• 18002102030
• Study Abroad

Disadvantages of A Nuclear Family: IELTS Sample Essays

• IELTS Preparation
• IELTS E-Books
• IELTS Registration
• IELTS Exam Fee
• IELTS Exam Dates 2024
• Documents Required
• IELTS Test Centers
• Test Format
• Band Descriptors
• IELTS Speaking Test
• General Reading Test
• General Writing Task
• IELTS Coaching
• Types of Essays
• IELTS for Australia
• IELTS Results
• Generation Gap Essay
• GPA Calculator
• Study Abroad Consultant In India
• Study Visa Consultants in India

Updated on 02 November, 2023

Akansha Semwal

Study abroad expert.

Argumentative essays for IELTS form the major writing tasks. An essay that defines the disadvantages of a nuclear family must also have generalized advantages and the writer's opinion at the end of the argument. This would display the knowledge and awareness the student writing the IELTS have. All the three aspects, when covered, IELTS bands 8 and 9 will be your result!

Table of Contents

Disadvantages of nuclear family: ielts essay sample 1, download e-books for ielts preparation, disadvantages of nuclear family: essay sample 2, frequently asked questions, more ielts essays topics to explore:.

Although the 21st century has redefined many terms- marriages, art, culture, etc., the one universally intact term is “Family”. Family is a pedestal on which society rests. With time, many factors have emerged, directly impacting the priorities and whittling our choices of living in a nuclear or joint family.

Studies have shown that this liberation has led the majority to aim for a nuclear family (comprising a husband, spouse, and unmarried children) rather than a joint family. Underlying benefits have induced this preference:

• Privacy is the prime factor in opting for nuclear families as the cultural advent has made it the need of an hour for many.
• Inspires the ladies of the house to take charge of all the necessities, helping them boost their self-esteem.
• Encourage financial stability and an environment of healthy discussion among members.

The rising graph of nuclear families depicts the ignorance towards the  disadvantages of a nuclear family , the significance of which needs to be cast in the light of:

• Burden of finances and the pressure of work-life balance, especially with infants, have to be borne solely on their own. 
• Gathering around a bunch of people boosts confidence and the ability to interact with individuals of all ages. This factor is amiss in nuclear families, especially when both parents are working. This accentuates boredom and induces low self-confidence.
• More members are equivalent to more support against any contingency, but nuclear families lack members.
• Induction of insecurity in the old members of the family.

The gist is that  nuclear families can be better, considering some aspects of life, but paradoxically, every choice has  disadvantages too,  that need to be equally pondered upon.

Word count: 275

Tentative band score: 6

Recommended Reads:

Most Indian families have historically been patriarchal. In such a setup, the eldest male member leads the family, is the decision-maker and the bread earner, while the woman administers household chores. As the concept of patriarchy deprived women of freedom of speech, and decision, she was considered the weaker sex. Gradually, India began to see a depletion in the number of joint families. In 2017, rural India too joined the nuclear family bandwagon. 

However, with the onset of nuclear families came its pitfalls. When living with others, the expenses were shared, and there was warmth in relationships. In the nuclear set up, the onus fell alone on the set of adults, keeping them under stress all the time. Thus, a nuclear setup is a stumbling block when the earning member is ailing or loses the means to earn. And if both the parents work, there is no one to take care of the children in their absence. The frustration of being alone at home makes children insecure and defiant.   

Apart from this, the jealousy factor of how other members of the clan are progressing is one of the disadvantages of a nuclear family. Relationships, in that case, become emotionless, doubling the materialistic attitude of the people. In fact, this has been pivotal in damaging the family's peace. 

Nevertheless, this enabled more consumerism and up-scaled the country's economy. Where earlier one refrigerator was enough for a family of 10, now, each family buys its own electronics, boosting the economy. Moreover, the nuclear family instills more responsibility among the children as they are independent and empowered to care for themselves. 

I believe the disadvantages of the nuclear family overpowers its advantages, although it is the preferred way of living for most couples. 

Word count: 289

Tentative band score: 5

Download IELTS Preparation Guide For Free

Get to know about the latest updates on the IELTS Exam, Eligibility, Preparation Tips, Test procedure,  Exam Pattern, Syllabus, Registration Process, Important Exam Dates, and much more!! This guide is a one-stop solution for every IELTS Aspirant who aims to crack the exam with an impressive band score.

Will I be judged if I write my opinion strongly in IELTS argumentative essay?

This is a test to score your writing skills and gauge the transition, and not that of your thoughts. With about 250 to 300 words to cover, it is important to judiciously utilize the space in writing the essay.

Won't it be paradoxical if I write both opinions in IELTS argumentative essay?

It is important to write the disadvantages and advantages of the given topic. Since you are writing your preference by writing 'for' or 'against' the topic at the end, this won't be paradoxical.

Important IELTS Exam Resources

Ielts exam overview.

IELTS is required to be taken by international students and workers who wish to study or work in a country where English is the primary language of communication. Know the complete details.

IELTS Exam Syllabus

With the right knowledge of the IELTS exam syllabus and pattern, cracking the popular English test won’t be difficult.

• IELTS Exam Pattern

The IELTS exam pattern encompasses four major sections, i.e. listening, speaking, writing, and reading.

Register For IELTS

IELTS is the most popular and crucial test for evaluating English language proficiency throughout the world. Learn how to register for the IELTS exam.

IELTS Exam Eligibility Criteria

It becomes necessary for candidates to meet the eligibility for IELTS exam and demonstrate their language proficiency while being assessed on four parameters, namely, Writing, Reading, Speaking and Listening.

IELTS Exam Fees

The IELTS exam fee in India varies based on the types of IELTS tests. The link below shows detailed information on the IELTS exam fees.

IELTS Exam Dates 2022

The IELTS exam dates are allotted on a first-come and first-serve basis. Choose your date and timings beforehand to avoid the delay. You can register for the test both in online and offline mode.

IELTS Test Centres in India

Fully aware of the growing popularity of the language test, we bring to you a list of IELTS exam centers in India. The list will enable aspirants in better planning before registering for the test.

Band Score for Reading

IELTS reading band score decides the knowledge and proficiency of the English language of the applicants.

IELTS Listening Band Score

The listening section evaluates the comprehension level of candidates. The scores also depend on the understanding of different accents and dialects.

IELTS Score Validity

The IELTS score validity for General and Academic is two years across the globe. The IELTS result validity for Canada is two years.

• Types of IELTS Exam

There are two types of IELTS tests – i) Academic IELTS and ii) General Training IELTS. Candidates are often confused about making the right choice of IELTS test that can meet their requirements regarding their education or job.

Books for IELTS Preparation

Picking the best IELTS books for preparation is essential for scoring well. It may seem tough at first but cracking the examination successfully is not impossible.

IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

Writing task 2 in IELTS is descriptive essay writing. The applicants are supposed to write an essay in response to the statement or situation given in the essay.

Tips for IELTS Writing

Before appearing for the test, let’s take a look at the below-mentioned IELTS writing tips and tricks to score well in the writing section.

Reading Section IELTS

Reading is the second part of the IELTS test and takes 60 minutes. It consists of three or sometimes four reading passages to increase difficulty, and there are a total of 40 questions to answer.

IELTS Speaking Preparation

Please note that your performance on the speaking test is assessed based on the following criteria- fluency and coherence, grammatical range and accuracy, lexical resource, and pronunciation.

Phrases for IELTS Speaking

There are many phrases for IELTS speaking that a candidate should practice beforehand. If you aim for band 9, you should know these phrases.

• IELTS Band Score Chart

IELTS is one of the most used English Language Proficiency Tests. The exam is scored in bands. Your IELTS band score determines the performance level of your test.

• IELTS Band Score

Understanding the IELTS band score is not difficult. The results of the examination are reported on a scale of 9 bands.

• IELTS Slot Booking

To book the IELTS exam, the candidates can either visit their nearest test center or book the slot online by visiting the official website of IDP. If they choose to go with the second option, they should follow the steps given below.

IELTS Academic Writing Task 1

IELTS Academic writing is meant for students who are applying for top-ranked universities and colleges in English-speaking countries. The writing task one is an academic summary writing based on diagrammatic and graphical representation.

• IELTS Writing Task 2

Writing Task 2 is the second part of the writing section of IELTS, where aspirants are presented with a point of view, argument, or problem and asked to write an essay in response to the question.

Writing Task 1 IELTS

In IELTS Academic Writing Task 1 starts with a diagram, a visual representation of information. It can be a table, map, graph, process, diagram, or picture.

IELTS Essay Samples

The essay for IELTS is part of Writing Task 2. It is the same for the General Training and Academic of the IELTS. You will get a topic and have to write an essay on the same.

IELTS Cue Cards

The IELTS speaking cue cards come into play for the second part when the candidate will be choosing cue cards and then speaking on a topic for two minutes at least.

Difference between Online and Offline Classes

Crop Growing Skyscrapers Reading Answers

Essay on Coronavirus 150 Words

How To Face Problems In Life

Paragraph On Digital India

Telecommuting Has Many Advantages And the Following Drawbacks

Advantages of Plastic Containers

Social Media Advantages and Disadvantages Essay

Honesty is the Best Policy Essay

Theme of the poem ‘The Road Not Taken’

Essay On Generation Gap

Akansha Semwal is a content marketer at upGrad and has also worked as a social media marketer & sub-editor. Experienced in creating impressive Statement of Purpose, Essays, and LOR, she knows how to captivate the attention of Admissions Committee. Her research-driven;study-abroad articles helps aspirants to make the prudent decision. She holds a bachelor's & master's degree in Literature from the University of Delhi.

Important Exams

Important ielts essay resources, get free consultation for ielts, trending searches, university ranking, university acceptance rate.

• University Of Illinois Springfield Qs Ranking
• Srh Berlin Ranking
• Ranking Of York St John University
• Uts Ranking In Australia
• Adelphi University Ranking
• St Louis University Ranking
• University Of Dayton Qs Ranking
• University Of Prince Edward Island Ranking
• Webster University Ranking
• Nyit Ranking
• University Of West London World Ranking
• Saint Peter'S University Ranking
• Clark University Ranking
• Purdue University World Ranking
• Illinois Institute Of Technology World Ranking
• University Of Freiburg Acceptance Rate
• Tu Darmstadt Acceptance Rate
• Sacred Heart University Visa Acceptance Rate
• University Of Cologne Acceptance Rate
• University Of Queensland Acceptance Rate
• Trent University Acceptance Rate
• University Of Kent Acceptance Rate
• Lewis University Visa Acceptance Rate
• Swinburne University Acceptance Rate
• University Of Technology Sydney Acceptance Rate
• Ontario Tech University Acceptance Rate
• Flooding And Its Impact
• Alzheimers Disease
• Titan Of Technology
• Amateur Naturalists
• IELTs Academic Writing
• Emigration To The US
• Honey Bees in Trouble
• IELTS Important Vocabulary
• The Scientific Method
• Light Pollution
• Rapid Police Response
• IELTS Band Description
• IELTS Line Graph
• Space Travel & Health
• IELTS Reading Band Score
• IELTS Speaking Topics
• Study in USA without IELTS
• Global Warming
• Nature & Nurture
• Literacy In Freedonia's Prisons
• Making Time for science
• Tips to Crack IELTS in First Attempt
• How to Be Confident While Speaking
• Science In Space

The above tips are the Author's experiences. upGrad does not guarantee scores or admissions.

Call us to clear your doubts at:

Download our App

• Grievance Redressal
• Experience Centers
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• University Partner
• Accommodation
• IELTS Band Calculator
• Download Study Abroad App
• Education Loan Calculator
• upGrad Abroad Office
• Expense Calculator
• Knowledge Base
• Business Partner

Top Destinations

Masters programs.

• MBA in Germany, IU
• MIM in Germany, IU
• MS in CS in Germany, IU
• MS in Data Analytics in USA, Clark University
• MS in Project Management in USA, Clark University
• MS in IT in USA, Clark University
• MS in Data Analytics & Visualization in USA, Yeshiva University
• MS in Artificial Intelligence in USA, Yeshiva University
• MS in Cybersecurity, Yeshiva University

Study Abroad Important Blogs

• Cost of Study:
• Cost of Studying in Canada
• Cost of Studying in Ireland
• Cost of Studying in Australia
• Cost of living:
• Cost of living in UK
• Cost of living in Australia
• Cost of living in Germany
• Cost of living in Ireland
• Cost of living in Canada
• Career Opportunities:
• Career Opportunities in Australia
• Career Opportunities in Germany
• Job Opportunities in After MS in Canada
• Job Opportunities After MBA in Australia
• Job Opportunities After MS in UK
• IELTS Exam Resources:
• Academic IELTS
• IELTS Score for UK
• IELTS Score for USA
• Validity of IELTS Score
• IELTS Reading Tips
• How to Prepare for IELTS at Home Without Coaching
• IELTS Preparation Books
• IELTS Academic vs General
• IELTS Essay
• IELTS Exam Dates
• Top Streams:
• Fashion Designing Courses in Australia
• Accounting Courses in Canada
• Management Courses in Canada

Extended Family System Essay

Family is considered as the basic unit of the society; better family relations can mold better citizens, and therefore the construction of a family structure that will contribute to both individual and communal well-being is an essential prerequisite of a harmonious community. As Vicky Agarwal states, “A family is s set of human beings related to each other in a non-professional manner, giving rise to a concrete cohesion within the family. Love, care, and affection are the most prominent human values, which are responsible for maintaining these bonds of relationships within a family.” (Agarwal, 2005). Thus, it is evident that whatever may be the family structure, the family is judged based on the mutual communion and the warmth of relationships that its members possess and share.

In the modern age, the trend towards family structure has shifted to the nuclear system where a father, mother, and their children constitute a compact unit. But a large number of divorce rates, smaller family sizes, break up of familial ties, the growing tension, and unrest, problems connected with child-rearing, and the condition of parents and children living under the same roof as individual alien members in the nuclear family system have all forced people to reconsider their priorities for a better ideal family structure. There is no wonder one reconsiders and feels nostalgia for the age-old traditional family structure of the extended family system. “The basic concept of the joint family system is that more than one family come together under one roof and leads a life of mutual cooperation and interdependence.” (Meenakshi, 2001).

The joint family system proves to be a better structure to meet the needs of the time as it creates a strong sense of belonging to a greater family tie where each member is assigned a defined role and where everyone in the family is cared for and looked after. The eldest male member in the family acts as the supreme head of the family, and almost all decisions are taken by the male members of the family: “Decisions are taken exclusively by the male members and women and children are rarely consulted. They have no say in family discussions.” (The Family). The female members in the family are supposed to manage domestic affairs, including the rearing of children. Despite this male domination and the possible arbitrary decisions of the head of the family, the system is effective for a number of reasons. Divorces among joint family members are very rare; widows, ill members, old people, and children whose parents are dead are properly taken care of in the joint family system. Children in the family receive attention from all the members, and grandparents in the family instill in their minds strong cultural and traditional values. Unlike nuclear families, the responsibility of women becomes easier as it is shared among other female members. As Andrea states,” We have adopted a family form that is restrictive and tremendously costly particularly to the women who now must single-handedly perform what a whole extended family network would have helped us do a hundred years ago….” (The Nuclear Family: Or, if Nuclear’s bad for the Environment, why is it Good for People? 2006).

Despite all these merits, the joint family system suffered a great setback due to a number of reasons. Social changes and man’s inner thirst for one’s freedom have resulted in the acceptance of nuclear families: “In the 1960s, four main societal changes occurred that have had an enormous impact on the traditional family structure. The sexual revolution, women’s liberation movement, States’ relaxation of divorce laws, and mobility if American families have converged to foster family alienation, exacerbate old family rifts, and create new ones.” (Barbara Vol.130, Sept 2001). As people became more educated and industrialization became widespread, they went in search of job opportunities and educated younger generation found it impossible to live under an arbitrary leadership where their freedom of choice was neglected: “The problem arises when there is the interference of family members and uninvited opinion as to how one should live or react in situations.” (Meera Chowdhery, 2001). Another major reason was the spread of women’s education and women liberation movements that found better expression of women’s voice in the nuclear system: “Marxist feminists suggest that the nuclear family meets the needs of capitalism for the reproduction of maintenance of class and patriarchal inequality.” (Jay c, 2004).

Now the question is, how can a system that is capable of addressing many of the present-day problems of family breakdowns be so easily discarded? What we need today is not completely a nuclear system or an extended family system, but a mixture of both. An extended family system where there are provisions for individual freedom and where every member in the family, including children, is involved in the decision-making policy is most recommendable. “Children need opportunities to make decisions, to participate in family decisions and to observe the parents’ decision-making process and results.” (Your Family Strengths: Clear Responsibilities). Communication gaps act as the killer of family unity, and therefore measures are to be undertaken for timely family discussions where each member gets the feeling that he or she is respected. “The best way to be organized as a family is to hold weekly family discussions. By doing this, families enjoy a special closeness and stability.” (Family Discussion). Studies show that in the US, the number of joint families has increased recently: “According to the latest US census data, the number of households with three or more generations living under one roof grew 38% from 1990 to 2000, vs. 8% for those with just two generations.” (Anne Tergesen. Thomson Gale. Cooperative Library System, 14 June 2007). Thus, one can possibly hope for a resurgence of the extended family system with the necessary changes of outlook and practice that suit the modern environment.

Works Cited

• Agarwal, Vikky. Analytic Views: Joint Family and Nuclear Family . Ezine Articles. Web.
• Jha, Meenakshi. In Defense of Joint Family System. Bologi.com.
• The Family . Web.
• The Nuclear Family: Or, if Nuclear’s bad for the environment, why is it good for people? Andrea.
• Lebey, Barbara. American Families are Drifting Apart. USA Today. Vol.130, 2001.
• Chowdhery, Meera. Viability of a Joint Family! Bologi.com. 2001.
• Jay, c. The Nuclear Family. Buzzle.com. 2004.
• Your Family Strengths: Clear Responsibilities. Family Ties. SKC Homepage. 2007.
• Family Discussion. Family Ties. SKC Homepage.
• Tergesen, Anne. Three Generations. One Roof; More and More Households are Doubling up. Here’s how to make it work. Business Week 3957. 2005. 92. Business and Company ASAP. Thomson Gale. Cooperative Library System, 2007.
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, September 16). Extended Family System. https://ivypanda.com/essays/extended-family-system/

"Extended Family System." IvyPanda , 16 Sept. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/extended-family-system/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Extended Family System'. 16 September.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Extended Family System." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/extended-family-system/.

1. IvyPanda . "Extended Family System." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/extended-family-system/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Extended Family System." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/extended-family-system/.

• Child Rearing Among Immigrant Communities
• Child-Rearing Choices and Social Factors
• Child Rearing Psychological Patterns in Japan and the United States
• Different Styles of Child Rearing Across the Globe
• Are all instincts random and arbitrary?
• Child-rearing Practices of Major Cultural Groups in the United States
• Rearing of Cattle: Deprecating the Beef Farming
• Child-Rearing Course for Teachers
• Roof Spread: The Problem Explanation and Suggestions for Its Solving
• Green Roof: Types, Components, Pros & Cons
• Romanian Families: Comparison to Canadian Ones
• Implication for Nursing Role in Prenatal Demise
• View of Abortion: The Question of Human Life and Death
• Care Plans for Pregnancy
• Family Factors: Gender, Religion, and Education

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essays Examples >
• Essay Topics

Essays on Nuclear Family

58 samples on this topic

The mixture of written assignments you might be tasked with while studying Nuclear Family is stunning. If some are too challenging, an expertly crafted sample Nuclear Family piece on a related subject might lead you out of a dead end. This is when you will definitely appreciate WowEssays.com ever-widening database of Nuclear Family essay samples meant to ignite your writing creativity.

Our directory of free college paper samples showcases the most vivid instances of top-notch writing on Nuclear Family and related topics. Not only can they help you develop an interesting and fresh topic, but also demonstrate the effective use of the best Nuclear Family writing practices and content structuring techniques. Also, keep in mind that you can use them as a trove of reliable sources and factual or statistical information processed by real masters of their craft with solid academic experience in the Nuclear Family area.

Alternatively, you can take advantage of effective write my essay assistance, when our authors provide a unique example essay on Nuclear Family tailored to your individual specifications!

Good Example Of Family Dynamics Essay

Introduction

Good Essay On Family Interview

Family Interview

Marriage And Family Essay Template For Faster Writing

Question 1: Demographic Changes in US families

Good Article Review On Gender Family And Society

Marriage in nuclear families: a top-quality research paper for your inspiration, good example of family structure in america and china essay, research methods for the behavioral sciences written in asa research proposal samples, example of essay on television, social institutions essays example.

(Author Name) (Course Name/Number)

Good Essay About The Changing Family In American Society

Write by example of this the family: contemporary issues report.

The Name of the University

Family History Essay Samples

Bowen’s family system model theory essay sample.

Delivery date

Free Family Essay Example

Free essay on social phenomenon, cultural anthropology course work sample.

Question 1 Compare the strengths and weaknesses of nuclear and extended families. Use information from examples in videos and text, and your own experiences.

Sexual Orientation And Moral Objectivity Course Work

Example of course work on sexual orientation and moral objectivity, example of sociology course work.

What re some myths about family life in the U.S.?

Same-Sex Couples And Adoption Report

Good example of essay on shaping the image of black america, free exploration of german family ethnicity research paper sample, free essay about the family in america, free the family as collateral damage:an analysis of children of men and 28 days later essay sample, free family sociology literature review sample, free gay parents essay sample, free essay about family: definition and classification, good essay about marriage, work and economics or intimate violence and sexual abuse, good example of essay on family impact on intimate relationships, free term paper on sociological analysis of the family, family assessment report samples.

Herzing University

Introduction An assessment refers to a process that is use to gather and organize information. Family assessment achieves this through ways that enable a family to avoid and tackle problems. Family assessment aims fully to understand different family views in an unbiased manner. It also aims to understand family values, strengths and goals. An effective family assessment also aims to build a strong relationship between family members and in engaging families and helpers in exploration of goals, values and strengths in order to create mutual respect and trust (Thomlison, 2009).

Identifying Family Data

Puzzle Image Creative Writing Sample

Creative Writing using the Preinventive Form: GAP Window Display

Good Art And Architecture Argumentative Essay Example

LA GRANDE JATTE

Free Essay On Development Of A General Sociological Orientation

Essay on families and gender roles within families, good feminism book book review example.

Book Review: Sexual Politics by Kate Millett

Sample Essay On Challenges Of Family Housing In Campus

Chinese-american culture through no name woman essay, essay on the end of noir, report on information sheet.

Report on Brunei Darussalam

The Color Of Family Ties Essay Example

Moral and ethic code essay, example of social pressures of women in the work force term paper.

This article is a discussion of problems that working women face in their careers, working in a male dominated corporate system and the evidence of existence of such practices. This article also debates upon the remedies that can be made and how some organizations have already begun considering methods to accommodate female talent in their work structure.

Should Gay Couples Be Able To Marry Argumentative Essay

Is gay marriage detrimental to the sanctity of marriage critical thinking examples, book review on w w norton & company incorporated, , 2008.

Chapter 7: Stratification.

Analysis Of Asian Horror Essay Examples

Article review on homophobia: a weapon of sexism, elements of culture research paper sample, representations of key social traits modern family research paper examples.

Representations of Key Social Traits Modern Family

Book Review On Review Contagious Divides By Nayan Shah

Book Review - Contagious Divides

Research Paper On The Navajo Tribe

Example of the london riots essay.

Social Deprivation and Breakdown of the Nuclear Family

The London Riots

Women Men And The American Family Thesis Sample

The American Family has been dramatically reshaped over the past century. Indeed the definition of what constitutes a “family” has become much more broadly defined. Whereas the century began with strong extended family ties, the decade ended with the small, nuclear family being the norm. The result often was that there fewer resources to draw upon in difficult times.

Free essay on the family

Culture in america essay, essay on treatment of families.

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

Sample details

Nuclear family

• Words: 1217

Related Topics

• Grandmother
• Family therapy
• Understanding
• Family Tradition
• Responsibility
• Importance of family

Extended family

• Interpersonal Relationship

Is the Nuclear Family Universal?

To find out if the nuclear family is universal the definition for nuclear and universal must be found. Nuclear is mainly defined by Murdock, who refers to a nuclear family as a stereotypical family, e.

g. a family consisting of two adults of the opposite sex who are married with one or more biological or adopted children. To make this a universal situation this must be true in all societies and it must be the only way in which a family is seen through everyone’s eyes.When Murdock looked at families he looked at only what he considered to be a family.

ready to help you now

Without paying upfront

He studied only a few societies and anything which he did not find to be a nuclear family he considered a broken nuclear family, e.g. a single parent family could be seen by Murdock as broken as the father was once present and is know, meaning the parents once had a sexual relationship and a child together, putting them in Murdock’s category as a nuclear family.Kathleen Gough found faults to Murdock’s theory by studying other societies; she studied mainly a South Indian tribe, the Nayar.

The Nayar hade many customs and traditions which would not put them in the category of Murdock’s Nuclear family. They practice polygamy; this is seen as a normal occurrence as it means there is no risk in the population falling.Murdock’s theory would also not apply as he states that the mother and father of the child are to be known, but in the Nayar tribe fathers were not known and it is the brother who takes care of the children’s mother and provides her with financial support. However as this society has disappeared it could be argued that Murdock was right and that not only is the nuclear family universal it is the best family situation.

In Murdock’s view another society, which wouldn’t fit into the nuclear family situation, would be the new world black family, as these types of families from west India often don’t contain any adult male and are mainly revolved around the children and women. Polygyny was also widely spread in this society to ensure there were always children and no decrease in the population. Being mainly a matrifocal society the core unit of the family base is mother and child, it also includes a wide number of aunts, grandmothers and female friends who all help to raise the children, however once again this could be argued to be a broken nuclear family in Murdock’s opinion.This is because the fathers were known in some, not all, situations and the mothers and fathers were once in an relationship, and possibly married, but were separated for a number of reasons, a main one being slavery, the main case was that women and men were split up and the children stayed with there mothers as they were less trouble, and the mothers could still care for them.

The women left in west India were almost always very poor, as they had no man to provide for them, so they had to have a large support group, mainly consisting of female family and friends, creating a generation of ‘independent women’.Another researcher of this was Hannerz, who disagreed with Murdock and said that the nuclear family was no longer the ‘only family’ but the new types of family, such as the new world black family were now ‘accepted and expected’Many other groups would not fit into Murdock’s ‘Nuclear family’ which suggests that he might not be right, another group who would not be in that category is homosexual couples, for the facts that they are not two adults of opposite sex and it is unusual for them to have children of there own, however it is possible in some circumstances such as adoption, or if one of both of the couple has children from a previous relationship, but if one of the partners does have a child from a previous heterosexual relationship it could be seen that there was the basis for a nuclear family and that they could just be part of a broken nuclear family, however this is not the case in most homosexual relationships.There are many other people who see homosexual couples as a variation of the nuclear family, Sidney Callahan suggests that partners in a long-term homosexual relationship would be married if they were legally allowed to therefore making them a family, especially if there are children involved, weeks et al agrees with Callahan and suggests that homosexual relationships with children could be stronger as it is more chosen than a heterosexual relationship.There are also other variations of families which would not come under the ‘Nuclear family’ description, families such as foster families wouldn’t, as the children involvers are neither bio-logical or adopted, this is the same for reconstituted families, as the step parent has no legal relationship to the child/children.

Childless couples would also not fall into the nuclear family category as there are two adults of opposite sex but they do not have children, this is regarded as a bad thing by some sociologists such as Toffler, who talks about the sandwich generation, which is the generation of people in there 50’s and 60’s who have two other generations to take care of, the older generation which needs more medical care as people are living longer, and there children who need more financial support in going to university.Toffler argues that the basic family unit couple, which contradicts Murdock’s, Gough’s and Yanina Sheeran, who argued the basic family core, was the female, ideas.There are also large groups of people who wouldn’t fit into any of these category’s, such as the Kibbutz, where they live in a communities situation rather than a family situation, once again this can however be argued by Murdock’s theory as all of the children know who there parents are and join them regularly for meals. The Mormons are also another example of a alternative family as there is not one couple with many children, a man has many wives as polygamy was popular in some groups of Mormons, so there is no one couple, however all children know who there actually mothers are and the father is obviously known.

There is even many variations of the nuclear family with things such as divorce becoming more common and there is a increasing number of single parent families. Anne Oakley came up with the idea that there is a new variation of the nuclear family, and that Murdock wasn’t necessarily wrong but right for his time. She suggested that, nuclear families are composed of legally married couples choosing voluntarily parenthood, of one or more not too many children.In conclusion the evidence indicates that whether you class a nuclear as universal, it is all dependant on how you define family.

It appears that all societies have a variet of families, it could be argued that all of these come from the original form of a nuclear family, and that all society’s there was no nuclear family have died out. Diana Griffins argued that the relationship was the core to a family, “relationships are universal…but all forms that these can take are infinitely variable and can be changed and challenged as well as embraced”.

Cite this page

https://graduateway.com/nuclear-family-essay/

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

• Family planning
• Family History
• Appreciation

Check more samples on your topics

Joint family vs nuclear family.

Healthy ageing is the process of optimizing opportunities for good health in order for older individuals to actively participate in society and maintain a high quality of life. According to Healthy Ageing: A Challenge for Europe, ageing does not have to be seen as a burden or decrease one's ability to contribute to society. In

Nuclear Family Ideal Family

The nuclear family is looked upon as the ideal family that now rarely happens. In today's society the nuclear family consists of mother and step dad, or father and step mom and their children whom they had together or with someone else. Florescent Paraphrase: Single-parent families are higher risk of poverty then two-parent families are.

The View of a Nuclear Family

Industrialisation

Did industrialisation lead to decline of the extended family and rise of the nuclear family? (use item B) The view of a nuclear family is a functionalist view; it is the idea that the typical family ideal includes two heterosexual parents that has the male as the bread winner and the instrumental role whereas the

Influence of Nuclear Family to Development of Antisocial Behaviour

Introduction A nuclear family is a family comprising of parent(s) and children. This model of family is an important aspect in modeling the future of the children. It is within the family environment that a child learns the art of socialization. The family is the first teacher of any child. Therefore, the family a child

Raising Children in a Nuclear Family

Using Sociological theories and explanations examine the view that the nuclear family is the ‘the best way to raise children’ The sociologists who believe that the nuclear family is the best way to raise children are the functionalists and the New Right.This essay will talk and examine the view that the nuclear family is ‘the

Pablo Picasso’s Family of Saltimbanques vs. Alice Neel’s The Family

Description             Picasso's Family of Saltimbanques was created in 1905 using oil on canvas.  Alice Neel's The Family was made in 1938 using the same medium as Picasso's.  In Picasso's painting, the  landscape is desolate and each member of the family is a circus person.  For instance, the man in a red clown suit could be

The Family Crucible: The Intense Experience of Family Therapy Sample

The Brice household was referred to household therapy by a celebrated kid head-shrinker. The head-shrinker was working with the teenage girl. Claudia. for about 6 months. He felt that she was acquiring worse instead he referred the full household to therapy. The household was hesitating to take part in household therapy. At the first meeting.

The Modern Family in Comparison With Family in the 19th Century

The family has been an important organization within society since ancient times, existing as a timeless and widespread human institution throughout history. The idea of family includes most people's childhood experiences within a family and their later creation of their own family as adults. One common form is the nuclear family, in which a couple becomes

Family Values in Series “Modern Family”

Phillip Green said it best when speaking of family, “it's all about quality of life and finding a happy balance between work and friends and family.” A family that is strong has the ability to mold both parents and children into substantial individuals and when they are brought together as a unit, the fortitude that

Hi, my name is Amy 👋

In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

SocialTalky.com

10 Nuclear Family Advantages and Disadvantages (2024)

Change is an inevitable part of everyone’s life. No one can escape it. In India, the joint family structure is quickly disintegrating. It is being replaced by the nuclear family model. 

A nuclear family includes kids, a wife, and a spouse – not sure if this disintegrates even further in future. A friend of mine was telling me that after 50 years, there will be no nuclear families too. There would be only you and me.

In our present generation of nuclear families, the youngsters leave their parent’s home when they get married or start earning. In a nuclear family, the association between wedded youngsters and guardians is less.

Article Contents

Nuclear Families in Western and Eastern Countries

In western countries like USA and Canada, children leave their parents home once they reach 18 years of age. In fact, most parents ask their children to leave the homes and live independently. This definitely is not happening in countries like India, China etc. yet.

Nuclear family setups are becoming more famous due to factors like increasing urbanization, changes in attitudes, the impact of westernization, the need for more privacy, and other factors. Financial independence is the core reason for the independent living behavior.

Adding to this, women wants to live independently from their husbands (even more nuclear) and are ready to even live alone without any partner as they are becoming capable to earn their livelihood and all other basic needs.

The nuclear family system is becoming popular due to these factors. However, this system is not perfect. In this article, we are going to talk about the merits and demerits of the nuclear family system.

Related : Advantages and Disadvantages of Joint Families

Advantages of Nuclear Family System

Some of the main benefits of living in a nuclear family system are:

More privacy and freedom

A nuclear family will give more freedom and privacy to couples. This will ensure that couples can spend time together and understand each other needs. In the modern family system, couples can easily share their expectations of each other. Living in a nuclear family also means that couples will have more freedom in making decisions together.

Financial stability 

Nuclear families generally have the financial stability to provide kids with luxuries, a safe environment, and opportunities. According to a report from the Pew Research Center, more than 57% of households with married parents are above the poverty line. Kids living in nuclear families are more likely to attend dance, music, and other types of classes. Children with these opportunities are more likely to experience social and academic success. 

Shared responsibilities 

Couples can decide on the shared responsibilities in the household. The best way to bond is by doing activities and chores together. Everyone in the family should be involved in family matters. This will ensure that the family will feel responsible and understand how interdependent they are. 

Decision-making 

If you are living in a nuclear family system, then you can easily reach a decision. The two major players involved in any decision are the man and his wife. They can also take the opinions of their children. However, major decisions will be taken by two people only. Since there are only two people involved in the decision-making process it is easy to decide. Other members of the family like the parents of the couple are not involved in this process. 

Sharing inheritance is easy 

In a nuclear family, it is easy to share the properties after the death of one spouse. There is no extended family member who will battle for the possession of the deceased properties. Everything will go to the children of the surviving spouse. This eliminates the confrontation which occurs among family members when death occurs.

Disadvantages of Nuclear Family System

Some of the main demerits of living in a nuclear family system are:

Sensation of disconnection 

Couples generally have chaotic plans for getting their work done. Sometimes couples don’t get time to spend with their kids. Due to this, the kids start spending their energy playing online games and watching TV. The presence of distant family members like an aunt or a grandparent is missed.

Problems with work-life balance 

This is the biggest problem that is faced by couples that are aiming for growth in their professional and personal spheres. Working couples face situations like working to meet a deadline or a child falling sick. If there is an unequal partnership, then mothers will be the ones who will struggle to cope with it. Most nuclear families feel a lack of support during these situations.

Difficulty in solving conflicts 

The nuclear family is generally small but it also has its own conflicts. In the absence of guidance and intervention from elders, the conflict can stay unresolved. This can affect your family relationships. It can affect the stability of your family.

Insecurity of children 

In Some nuclear families both the wife and husband work. Due to this, the children are neglected. They are cared for by the maid or staff as the parents are busy with their professional work. Due to this, the children are insecure and lonely. If something happens to parents, then there is no one to support the children. Even in emergency situations like pregnancy, accident, or illness, the family members are neglected. 

Parents become lonely 

One of the main disadvantages of living in a nuclear family is that the parents will become lonely as they grow older. This happens when children become older and get married. Sometimes they can neglect the needs of their parents. If you are living in an extended family, then there will be a support system. This support system will be missing in a nuclear family.

Also Read: 7 Tips To Foster Good Relationships Within Your Team

There are both merits and demerits of living in a nuclear family. However, the final decision will ultimately depend on you and your partner. The nuclear family is still considered the best method to raise kids. There is no guarantee but it will at least make you independent and strong.

Similar Posts

7 collaborative practices to improve community management in 2022.

Community projects bring together people from all walks of life and with different beliefs. It might seem challenging to enhance teamwork in the beginning. However, there are ways to foster collaboration among members more easily. This article will share practices that you can adopt in your community management for better project execution. Practice the following:…

What Types of Therapy Can Help You Get Through an Eating Disorder?

Eating disorders are a set of disorders that involve food, thoughts about food and self, and compulsions. They can accompany stress, sleep issues, physical health problems, and other mental health conditions like depression.  If you are going through an eating disorder, you may be wondering what types of therapy are available and how therapy can help…

The Different Stages of Couples Therapy and What to Expect

When couples first get into therapy, there are a lot of thoughts and concerns that will come up. This is understandable because relationships take time to heal and build trust. According to John Maret Counseling, it’s also common for both partners to experience couples therapy differently, depending on their background and presenting issues. 1. Stabilization…

How to Know If You Are Going Through Domestic Violence in Your Relationship

In most relationships, the goal is to make your partner happy and to feel happy and loved. We form relationships to make deep connections with other humans and start families. No matter who we are, most people want to settle down someday.  If you’re in a relationship and feel that it’s not going exactly as you…

What Are the Stages of Grief and How Can I Get Through Them?

You may have heard of the stages of grief before. There are seven official stages, although some people only list five. The grieving process can often last a very long time in cases of loss where there was a wrongful or accidental death or death of someone extremely close to you in an unexpected way.  Read…

Should I Try Family or Individual Therapy?

You may be considering therapy if you’re going through family struggles. These could include drug or alcohol abuse in a family member, internal family conflicts, trying to bring up an important topic with parents, and more.  If you’re considering therapy to deal with family conflict, you may be wondering whether family or individual therapy is a…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

EssayEmpire

Nuclear family essay.

The nuclear family consists of a married couple and their children, either natural or adopted, who reside within the same household. Because the nuclear family is based on marriage, it is also called the “conjugal family.” Nuclear families form around marriage, a legal relationship that includes economic cooperation, sexual activity, and childbearing and childrearing, which people expect to last. Although many different types of family exist in North America, the nuclear family has long been considered the norm.

The origin of the nuclear family is connected to the economic and social changes of the industrial revolution. The nuclear family’s smaller size, in relation to the larger extended family, was considered better suited for moving closer to the occupational opportunities the industrial revolution created.

The traditional view of the nuclear family consisting of a husband and wife and their dependent children living within the same household is based on the ideal of the husband/father breadwinner and the wife/mother as the family caretaker. However, the male breadwinner/female caretaker nuclear family was only possible when men could earn enough to support their families. Throughout history, many nuclear families have had to rely on wages earned by women in order to remain economically stable.

With specific gender roles, the nuclear family becomes a distinctive group, whose function in society is to socialize the children and to provide emotional support, love, and affection for the family members. As the family members turn to each other for emotional gratification, the home is seen as a safe haven and private retreat from the larger community.

The prevailing view of the nuclear family coming about with the industrial revolution may be a myth. The examination of birth, death, and marriage records from 17th-century English and American households shows that the dominant family form was nuclear. Sociologists now believe that the concept of childhood, a period of time to train and prepare children to become adults, emerged during the 17th century. The increased importance given to the welfare of children necessitated the formation of close bonds among family members and the stability of the family unit.

The nuclear family is also seen as an isolated, independent unit that is self-reliant within society. This view assumes that the nuclear family’s association with relatives is distant and that the extended family does not play an important role in the nuclear family. However, many nuclear families do remain within the same geographic location as their relatives. Extended family members often provide services, such as child care and financial assistance. For families that are scattered across the United States, modern transportation and communication help families maintain their bonds.

Today, many feel that the stability of the nuclear family is being threatened by divorce, cohabitation, single parenthood, and gay and lesbian couples. It is feared that the breakdown of the nuclear family will lead to the breakdown of society. Despite these “threats” to the nuclear family, most people still want to be a part of this family structure. The nuclear family will likely remain a foundation of U.S. society for some time to come.

Bibliography:

• Adams, Bert A. 1995. The Family: A Sociological Interpretation. 5th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
• Coontz, Stephanie. 2000. The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.
• Hutter, Mark. 1998. The Changing Family. 3rd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

This example Nuclear Family Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

• How to Write an Argumentative Essay
• Argumentative Essay Topics
• Custom Essay Writing Service

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

Special offer!

GET 10% OFF WITH  24START  DISCOUNT CODE

Related posts.

• Our Service

Làm thế nào để viết Essay về Nuclear Family

Viết Nuclear Family Essay có thể là hành trình thú vị nhưng cũng có thể là trải nghiệm tồi tệ của sinh viên. Đặc biệt là khi bạn không có kiến thức, kinh nghiệm, thậm chí không hiểu về khái niệm Nuclear Family. Nhưng rất may, với các hướng dẫn cụ thể dưới đây của MAAS, bạn hoàn toàn có thể viết Nuclear Family Essay nhanh, dễ đạt điểm cao.

Sử dụng Essay Service của MAAS để có một bài Nuclear Family Essay  hoàn chỉnh và tốt nhất tại đây .

>>>Làm thế nào để viết Essay về Advantages and Disadvantages của Tourism >>>Làm thế nào để viết Environmental Pollution Essay

Bài viết này có gì

• 1. Nuclear Family Essay là gì? 

a. Giới thiệu 

B. thân bài , c. kết luận , 3. khó khăn khi tự viết nuclear family essay, a. nghiên cứu kỹ về nuclear family .

• b. Tham khảo Nuclear Family Essay example 

c. Liên hệ chuyên gia của MAAS

5. dịch vụ về maas, 1. nuclear family essay là gì  .

Hiểu rõ về Nuclear Family để làm Essay tốt hơn

Làm Nuclear Family Essay (bài luận về gia đình hạt nhân) là nhiệm vụ của sinh viên đang theo học nhiều ngành, nhiều nghề khác nhau, đặc biệt là những ngành tập trung vào yếu tố con người và mối quan hệ giữa các thành viên trong gia đình như Social Work (Công tác xã hội). Nhưng để hiểu về cách viết, cách triển khai bài Essay về Nuclear Family, sinh viên phải biết Nuclear Family hay gia đình hạt nhân là gì. Nó có đặc điểm như thế nào….

Theo đó, trong cuốn “Dictionary of Sociology”, Duncan Mitchell đã chia sẻ về định nghĩa gia đình hạt nhân – đó là một nhóm nhỏ bao gồm vợ chồng và những đứa trẻ chưa trưởng thành. Họ tạo thành một đơn vị tách biệt so với phần còn lại của cộng đồng. Hiểu một cách đơn giản, gia đình hạt nhân là gia đình bao gồm vợ chồng và con cái của họ. Sau khi kết hôn, những đứa trẻ sẽ rời cha mẹ và tạo ra những gia đình hạt nhân của riêng mình.

Gia đình hạt nhân cũng được ví là một đơn vị tự trị – nơi không có sự kiểm soát của người lớn tuổi. Vì nó chỉ bao gồm hai lớp thành viên là cha mẹ và con cái còn nhỏ của họ. Hơn nữa, hiện các gia đình hạt nhân đang đóng góp rất lớn cho xã hội, đặc biệt là ở những xã hội mà con cái trưởng thành sẽ sống tách riêng với cha mẹ như Mỹ hay các quốc gia phương Tây.

Đây cũng là lý do việc viết bài Essay về Nuclear Family đóng vai trò vô cùng quan trọng trong việc hiểu về cấu trúc xã hội hoặc các vấn đề xã hội phổ biến. Trong đó, có những vấn đề liên quan đến dân cư, con người….

2. Cấu trúc Nuclear Family Essay 

Hiểu về khái niệm Nuclear Family là bước đầu tiên để bạn có thể triển khai bài essay về chủ đề này. Nhưng chỉ biết Nuclear Family là gì thôi thì chưa đủ. Người viết phải hiểu về cấu trúc của bài viết để có thể áp dụng một cách linh hoạt. Cụ thể, bài Nuclear Family Essay thường gồm 3 phần chính là: 

Trong phần này, sinh viên cần giới thiệu sơ lược về gia đình hạt nhân, về những vấn đề mà một gia đình hạt nhân có thể phải đối mặt hay ưu nhược điểm cơ bản của hình thức này. Cuối phần giới thiệu, bạn cũng phải nghiên cứu để đưa ra một tuyên bố luận án xuất sắc, có thể khiến người đọc ấn tượng hơn với bài Essay về Nuclear Family của bạn.

Thân bài là phần mà tác giả cần triển khai hết các nội dung thông tin quan trọng. Đặc biệt là lập luận, dẫn chứng, ví dụ thực tế để chứng minh cho quan điểm của bản thân, thậm chí là phản bác quan điểm của người khác. 

Hơn nữa, trong phần thân bài của Nuclear Family Essay , bạn cần đặc biệt chú ý đến Advantage/ Disadvantage of Nuclear Family . Vì những lợi thế và bất lợi chính của gia đình hạt nhân đang có ảnh hưởng sâu rộng. Nó đang không ngừng tác động đến các bài Essay về Nuclear Family. Thậm chí, dù bạn chọn topic ra sao, việc hiểu về lợi thế và bất lợi của gia đình hạt nhân cũng giúp bạn triển khai phần thân bài tốt hơn. 

Sinh viên cần đưa ra kết luận về gia đình hạt nhân, về những Advantage/ Disadvantage of Nuclear Family . Đặc biệt, bạn nên tập trung vào việc tổng kết lại vấn đề đã nêu ở phần mở bài. Hãy trả lời cho câu hỏi nghiên cứu đã được đặt ra.

Những vấn đề khi viết Nuclear Family Essay

Bản chất của Nuclear Family Essay là dùng các kiến thức đã học trên lớp và kiến thức xã hội của bản thân để trả lời cho câu hỏi nghiên cứu. Sau khi thực hiện bài luận này, bạn sẽ nâng cao kiến thức chuyên môn, đúc rút được nhiều kinh nghiệm…. Tuy nhiên, để hoàn thành bài Nuclear Family Essay , sinh viên cũng phải đối mặt với nhiều khó khăn, thử thách như:

– Viết Essay về Nuclear Family rất tốn thời gian và không phải sinh viên nào cũng sắp xếp đủ thời gian để có thể chuẩn bị cho bài viết một cách tốt nhất.

– Trong quá trình làm Essay về Nuclear Family, bạn sẽ phải tự đối mặt với mọi vấn đề. Bạn cần có sự tỉ mỉ, cẩn trọng và khả năng làm việc độc lập tốt, có thể kiên trì và chịu áp lực cao trong thời gian dài.

– Dạng bài luận này yêu cầu người viết có kiến thức xã hội phong phú. Nếu không hiểu về gia đình nói chung và Nuclear Family nói riêng, bạn không thể viết bài essay xuất sắc, đảm bảo yêu cầu.

– Với du học sinh, một trong những rào cản lớn trong việc viết Essay về Nuclear Family là kém ngoại ngữ, chưa thực sự vận dụng câu từ một cách linh hoạt….

Nhìn chung, lợi ích khi tự viết Nuclear Family Essay là điều không thể phủ nhận. Nhưng đi kèm với lợi ích, sinh viên sẽ phải đối mặt với vô số khó khăn. Vì vậy, sau khi nhận được yêu cầu viết bài, bạn nên tự đánh giá năng lực của bản thân. 

Nếu thấy chưa tự tin với dạng bài luận này, nếu cần có Nuclear Family Essay xuất sắc để đảm bảo nhận được học bổng hoặc dễ dàng đăng ký học ở bậc học cao hơn, bạn nên liên hệ các đơn vị chuyên cung cấp dịch vụ hỗ trợ cho học sinh, sinh viên, du học sinh như MAAS. Tại MAAS, bạn có thể dùng essay service để trực tiếp làm việc với các essay writer help , assignment writer giỏi. Bạn cũng có thể dùng các writing service như: online test service , viết thuê Assignment … để hoàn thành nhiều nhiệm vụ học tập khác.

Tham khảo thêm dịch vụ viết của MAAS tại đây bạn nhé!

4. Mẹo viết Nuclear Family Essay đạt điểm cao

Một số vấn đề về gia đình đang được đưa vào “mổ xẻ” tại các hội nghị quốc tế. Vì vậy, không có gì lạ khi nhiều sinh viên được yêu cầu viết Nuclear Family Essay . Tuy nhiên, dù là yêu cầu phổ biến nhưng không phải sinh viên nào cũng biết đáp án của câu hỏi “ how to write a Nuclear Family Essay ?”, cũng tự tin trong việc làm dạng bài luận này. Nếu bạn thuộc nhóm này thì nên biết các hướng dẫn để có thể viết bài Essay về Nuclear Family tốt hơn như:

Sinh viên luôn phải nghiên cứu kỹ về khái niệm Nuclear Family, luôn phải biết các lợi ích và bất lợi của mô hình gia đình này. Vì chỉ khi thực sự hiểu về Nuclear Family, bạn mới có thể tìm ra topic hay, mới có thể triển khai bài viết thuận lợi, ấn tượng.

b. Tham khảo Nuclear Family Essay example  

Gợi ý thứ hai dành cho sinh viên đang băn khoăn “ how to write a Nuclear Family Essay ?” là tham khảo các Nuclear Family Essay example . Nhiều sinh viên đã xem cách này là giải pháp hiệu quả để cải thiện bài viết, nâng cao điểm số. 

Hơn nữa, cách này rất dễ áp dụng. Bạn chỉ cần dùng thiết bị có kết nối internet để tìm các Nuclear Family Essay example xuất sắc hoặc tìm những bài mẫu đạt điểm cao này trong thư viện của trường đại học. Sau đó, tiến hành nghiên cứu để hiểu về đặc trưng, về cách giúp bài luận trở nên ấn tượng hay những sai lầm cần tránh trong suốt quá trình viết bài.

Essay Service của MAAS sẽ giúp bạn có bài Nuclear Family Essay hoàn chỉnh nhất

Nuclear Family Essay có thể là thử thách rất khó. Nhưng bạn nhất định phải vượt qua. Để làm được điều này, bạn có thể liên hệ với essay writer help , assignment writer của MAAS. Đội ngũ chuyên gia giỏi của công ty luôn sẵn sàng hỗ trợ để bạn có bài luận chất lượng.

Đặc biệt, MAAS có nhiều chuyên gia am hiểu về Nuclear Family. Họ có thể giúp bạn có thêm kiến thức, kinh nghiệm hữu ích về chủ đề này. Ngoài Essay Service của MAAS, bạn cũng có thể tham khảo các writing service khác như: viết thuê Assignment , Online Test Service … để không ngừng cải thiện điểm số.

Hoàn thành deadline và giải quyết các bài tập, thi cử đã không còn xa lạ đối với học sinh đặc biệt là các bạn du học sinh tại nước ngoài. Vì vậy, MAAS ra đời với sứ mệnh mang đến các writing service tối ưu cho deadline của bạn. 

MAAS Essay Service – chuyên cung cấp các dịch vụ academic writing hàng đầu tại Việt Nam. Với 8 năm kinh nghiệm, chúng tôi luôn nỗ lực mang đến cho khách hàng những trải nghiệm tốt nhất với các dịch vụ: assignment help, check turnitin, writing service essay, assignment making,…  Hiện tại, MAAS đã hỗ trợ hơn 300,000 sinh viên và hoàn thành hơn 35,000 bài Dissertation với các chủ đề khác nhau cho khách hàng ở khắp nơi trên thế giới như UK, Úc, Mỹ, Canada,…

Ngoài các writing service như: Online Test Service, Assignment Service, Essay Service, Dissertation Service . Công ty chúng tôi còn cung cấp các dạng dịch vụ Research, Report, Case Study, Business Plan, Personal Statement ,… Dù là bất cứ dịch vụ nào chúng tôi đều hoàn thành xuất sắc để khi đến tay khách hàng đó sẽ là những bài viết tốt nhất mang lại sự hài lòng tuyệt đối.

Mong rằng bạn đã có được những thông tin cần thiết cho bài Nuclear Family Essay  thông qua những gì MAAS cung cấp. Nếu có khó khăn trong quá trình viết bài, bạn hãy liên hệ MAAS để được tư vấn và hỗ trợ nhanh nhất nhé!

Sứ mệnh của MAAS cung cấp platform website writers essay kết nối giữa sinh viên và writer nhằm đem đến kết quả học tập phù hợp với yêu cầu  của từng sinh viên, tại MAAS chúng tôi chuyên nghiệp trên từng dịch vụ như Assignment help, Website writers essay, writing service essay, dissertation Service, Online Exam test service . Đội ngũ Writer tại MAAS chuyên nghiệp và giàu kinh nghiệm đa dạng trong nhiều lĩnh vực academic sẽ hỗ trợ bạn hoàn thành mục tiêu học tập của mình. Tham khảo thêm feedback từ khách hàng đã đặt bài tại MAAS qua video bên dưới.

Email:  [email protected]

Hotline 1:   (+84)97 942 23 93

Hotline 2:  (+84)89 851 15 88

https://www.facebook.com/maas.vn2022/

https://www.instagram.com/maas.assignment/ 

https://twitter.com/MaasService

https://www.tiktok.com/@maas.assignment.service

Google Map:

https://g.page/MAASEDTECH?share

Bài viết hữu ích với bạn chứ?

Bài viết liên quan

Tất tần tật về du học nước ngoài

Top 5 lý do nên tham gia CLB ở đại học

Checklist các “Group” cộng đồng người Việt ở Anh

Top những trường đại học tại Houston

Top trường đại học đáng theo học ở Liverpool

Top 6 phần mềm kiểm tra đạo văn tốt nhất hiện nay

24X7 SUPPORT

To Get The Best Price

Chat With Our Experts

IN A HURRY ?

Get a call back

Để lại thông tin để đội ngũ MAAS gửi tài liệu nhé !

Have any query ?

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

Saying Goodbye to My Brilliant Friend, the Poetry Critic Helen Vendler

By Roger Rosenblatt

The author, most recently, of “Cataract Blues: Running the Keyboard.”

One makes so few new friends in older age — I mean, real friends, the ones you bond with and hold dear, as if you’d known one another since childhood.

Old age often prevents, or at least tempers, such discoveries. The joy of suddenly finding someone of compatible tastes, politics, intellectual interests and sense of humor can be shadowed, if tacitly, by the inevitable prospect of loss.

I became friends with Helen Vendler — the legendary poetry critic who died last week — six years ago, after she came to a talk I gave at Harvard about my 1965-66 Fulbright year in Ireland. Our friendship was close at the outset and was fortified and deepened by many letters between us, by our writing.

Some critics gain notice by something new they discover in the literature they examine. Helen became the most important critic of the age by dealing with something old and basic — the fact that great poetry was, well, lovable. Her vast knowledge of it was not like anyone else’s, and she embraced the poets she admired with informed exuberance.

The evening we met, Helen and I huddled together for an hour, maybe two, speaking of the great Celtic scholar John Kelleher, under whom we had both studied; of Irish poetry; and of our families. Helen was born to cruelly restrictive Irish Catholic parents who would not think of her going to anything but a Catholic college. When Helen rebelled against them, she was effectively tossed out and never allowed to return home.

She told me all this at our very first meeting. And I told her the sorrows of my own life — the untimely death of my daughter, Amy, and the seven-plus years my wife, Ginny, and I spent helping to rear her three children. And I told Helen unhappy things about my own upbringing. The loneliness. I think we both sensed that we had found someone we could trust with our lives.

I never asked Helen why she had come to my talk in the first place, though I had recognized her immediately. After spending a life with English and American poetry — especially the poetry of Wallace Stevens — how could I not? The alert tilt of her head, the two parenthetical lines around the mouth that always seemed on the verge of saying something meaningful and the sad-kind-wise eyes of the most significant literary figure since Edmund Wilson.

And unlike Wilson, Helen was never compelled to show off. She knew as much about American writing as Wilson, and, I believe, loved it more.

It was that, even more than the breadth and depth of her learning, that set her apart. She was a poet who didn’t write poetry, but felt it like a poet, and thus knew the art form to the core of her being. Her method of “close reading,” studying a poem intently word by word, was her way of writing it in reverse.

Weeks before Helen’s death and what would have been her 91st birthday, we exchanged letters. I had sent her an essay I’d just written on the beauty of wonder, stemming from the wonder so many people felt upon viewing the total solar eclipse earlier this month. I often sent Helen things I wrote. Some she liked less than others, and she was never shy to say so. She liked the essay on wonder, though she said she was never a wonderer herself, but a “hopeless pragmatist,” not subject to miracles, except upon two occasions. One was the birth of her son, David, whom she mentioned in letters often. She loved David deeply, and both were happy when she moved from epic Cambridge to lyrical Laguna Niguel, Calif., to be near him, as she grew infirm.

Her second miracle, coincidentally, occurred when Seamus Heaney drove her to see a solar eclipse at Tintern Abbey. There, among the Welsh ruins, Helen had an astonishing experience, one that she described to me in a way that seemed almost to evoke Wordsworth:

I had of course read descriptions of the phenomena of a total eclipse, but no words could equal the total-body/total landscape effect; the ceasing of bird song; the inexorability of the dimming to a crescent and then to a corona; the total silence; the gradual salience of the stars; the iciness of the silhouette of the towers; the looming terror of the steely eclipse of all of nature. Now that quelled utterly any purely “scientific” interest. One became pure animal, only animal, no “thought-process” being even conceivable.

One who claims not to know wonders shows herself to be one.

She was so intent on the beauty of the poets she understood so deeply, she never could see why others found her appreciations remarkable. Once, when I sent her a note complimenting her on a wonderfully original observation she’d made in a recent article, she wrote: “So kind of you to encourage me. I always feel that everything I say would be obvious to anyone who can read, so am always amazed when someone praises something.”

Only an innocent of the highest order would say such a beautiful, preposterous thing. When recently the American Academy of Arts and Letters awarded her the Gold Medal for Belle Lettres and Criticism, Helen was shocked.

“You could have floored me when I got the call,” she wrote to me, adding: “Perhaps I was chosen by the committee because of my advanced age; if so, I can’t complain. The quote that came to mind was Lowell’s ‘My head grizzled with the years’ gold garbage.’”

She was always doing that — attaching a quotation from poetry to a thought or experience of her own, as if she occupied the same room as all the great poets, living with them as closely as loved ones in a tenement.

Shelley called poets the “unacknowledged legislators of the world.” I never fully got that famous line. But if the legislators’ laws apply to feeling and conduct, I think he was onto something. If one reads poetry — ancient and modern — as deeply as Helen did, and stays with it, and lets it roll around in one’s head, the effect is transporting. You find yourself in a better realm of feeling and language. And nothing of the noisier outer world — not Donald Trump, not Taylor Swift — can get to you.

In our last exchange of letters, Helen told me about the death she was arranging for herself. I was brokenhearted to realize that I was losing someone who had given me and countless others so much thought and joy. Her last words to me were telling, though, and settled the matter as only practical, spiritual Helen could:

I feel not a whit sad at the fact of death, but massively sad at leaving friends behind, among whom you count dearly. I have always known what my true feelings are by whatever line of poetry rises unbidden to my mind on any occasion; to my genuine happiness, this time was a line from Herbert’s “Evensong,” in which God (always in Herbert, more like Jesus than Jehovah), says to the poet, “Henceforth repose; your work is done.”

She closed her letter as I closed my response. “Love and farewell.”

Roger Rosenblatt is the author, most recently, of “Cataract Blues: Running the Keyboard.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , WhatsApp , X and Threads .

Advertisement

The best new science fiction books of May 2024

A new Stephen King short story collection, an Ursula K. Le Guin reissue and a celebration of cyberpunk featuring writing from Philip K. Dick and Cory Doctorow are among the new science fiction titles published this month

By Alison Flood

A new short story collection from Stephen King, You Like It Darker, is out in May

Shane Leonard

Every month, I trawl through publishers’ catalogues so I can tell you about the new science fiction being released. And every month, I’m disappointed to see so much more fantasy on publishers’ lists than sci-fi. I know it’s a response to the huge boom in readers of what’s been dubbed “ romantasy ”, and I’m not knocking it – I love that sort of book too. But it would be great to see more good, hard, mind-expanding sci-fi in the offing as well.

In the meantime, there is definitely enough for us sci-fi fans to sink our teeth into this month, whether it’s a reissue of classic writing from Ursula K. Le Guin, some new speculative short stories from Stephen King or murder in space from Victor Manibo and S. A. Barnes.

Last month, I tipped Douglas Preston’s Extinction and Sofia Samatar’s The Practice, the Horizon, and the Chain as books I was looking forward to. I can report that they were both excellent: Extinction was a lot of good, clean, Jurassic Park -tinged fun, while Samatar’s offering was a beautiful and thought-provoking look at life on a generation ship.

The Language of the Night: Essays on writing, science fiction, and fantasy by Ursula K. Le Guin

There are few sci-fi and fantasy writers more brilliant (and revered) than Ursula K. Le Guin. This reissue of her first full-length collection of essays features a new introduction from Hugo and Nebula award-winner Ken Liu and covers the writing of The Left Hand of Darkness and A Wizard of Earthsea , as well as her advocacy for sci-fi and fantasy as legitimate literary mediums. I’ve read some of these essays but not all, and I won’t be missing this collection.

Nuclear War: A Scenario by Annie Jacobsen

This isn’t science fiction, not quite, but it is one of the best and most important books I have read for some time. It sees Jacobsen lay out, minute by minute, what would happen if an intercontinental ballistic missile hit Washington DC. How would the US react? What, exactly, happens if deterrence fails? Jacobsen has spoken to dozens of military experts to put together what her publisher calls a “non-fiction thriller”, and what I call the scariest book I have possibly ever read (and I’m a Stephen King fan; see below). We’re currently reading it at the New Scientist Book Club, and you can sign up to join us here .

Read an extract from Nuclear War: A scenario by Annie Jacobsen

In this terrifying extract from Annie Jacobsen’s Nuclear War: A Scenario, the author lays out what would happen in the first seconds after a nuclear missile hits the Pentagon

The Big Book of Cyberpunk (Vol 1 & 2)

Forty years ago, William Gibson published Neuromancer . Since then, it has entranced millions of readers right from its unforgettable opening line: “The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel…”. Neuromancer gave us the literary genre that is cyberpunk, and we can now welcome a huge, two-volume anthology celebrating cyberpunk’s best stories, by writers from Cory Doctorow to Justina Robson, and from Samuel R. Delaney to Philip K. Dick. I have both glorious-sounding volumes, brought together by anthologist Jared Shurin, on my desk (using up most of the space on it), and I am looking forward to dipping in.

You Like It Darker by Stephen King

You could categorise Stephen King as a horror writer. I see him as an expert chronicler of the dark side of small-town America, and from The Tommyknockers and its aliens to Under the Dome with its literally divisive trope, he frequently slides into sci-fi. Even the horror at the heart of It is some sort of cosmic hideousness. He is one of my favourite writers, and You Like It Darker is a new collection of short stories that moves from “the folds in reality where anything can happen” to a “psychic flash” that upends dozens of lives. There’s a sequel to Cujo , and a look at “corners of the universe best left unexplored”. I’ve read the first story so far, and I can confirm there is plenty for us sci-fi fans here.

Enlightenment by Sarah Perry

Not sci-fi, but fiction about science – and from one of the UK’s most exciting writers (if you haven’t read The Essex Serpent yet, you’re in for a treat). This time, Perry tells the story of Thomas Hart, a columnist on the Essex Chronicle who becomes a passionate amateur astronomer as the comet Hale-Bopp approaches in 1997. Our sci-fi columnist Emily Wilson is reviewing it for New Scientist ’s 11 May issue, and she has given it a vigorous thumbs up (“a beautiful, compassionate and memorable book,” she writes in a sneak preview just for you guys).

Ghost Station by S.A. Barnes

Dr Ophelia Bray is a psychologist and expert in the study of Eckhart-Reiser syndrome, a fictional condition that affects space travellers in terrible ways. She’s sent to help a small crew whose colleague recently died, but as they begin life on an abandoned planet, she realises that her charges are hiding something. And then the pilot is murdered… Horror in space? Mysterious planets? I’m up for that.

In Hey, Zoey, the protagonist finds an animatronic sex doll hidden in her garage

Shutterstock / FOTOGRIN

Hey, Zoey by Sarah Crossan

Hot on the heels of Sierra Greer’s story about a sex robot wondering what it means to be human in Annie Bot , the acclaimed young adult and children’s author Sarah Crossan has ventured into similar territory. In Hey, Zoey , Dolores finds an animatronic sex doll hidden in her garage and assumes it belongs to her husband David. She takes no action – but then Dolores and Zoey begin to talk, and Dolores’s life changes.

How to Become the Dark Lord and Die Trying by Django Wexler

Davi has tried to take down the Dark Lord before, rallying humanity and making the final charge – as you do. But the time loop she is stuck in always defeats her, and she loses the battle in the end. This time around, Davi decides that the best thing to do is to become the Dark Lord herself. You could argue that this is fantasy, but it has a time loop, so I’m going to count it as sci-fi. It sounds fun and lighthearted: quotes from early readers are along the lines of “A darkly comic delight”, and we could all use a bit of that these days.

Escape Velocity by Victor Manibo

It’s 2089, and there’s an old murder hanging over the clientele of Space Habitat Altaire, a luxury space hotel, while an “unforeseen threat” is also brewing in the service corridors. A thriller in space? Sounds excellent – and I’m keen to see if Manibo makes use of the latest research into the angle at which blood might travel following violence in space, as reported on by our New Scientist humour columnist Marc Abrahams recently.

The best new science fiction books of March 2024

With a new Adrian Tchaikovsky, Mars-set romance from Natasha Pulley and a high-concept thriller from Stuart Turton due to hit shelves, there is plenty of great new science fiction to be reading in March

In Our Stars by Jack Campbell

Part of the Doomed Earth series, this follows Lieutenant Selene Genji, who has been genetically engineered with partly alien DNA and has “one last chance to save the Earth from destruction”. Beautifully retro cover for this space adventure – not to judge a book in this way, of course…

The Downloaded by Robert J. Sawyer

Two sets of people have had their minds uploaded into a quantum computer in the Ontario of 2059. Astronauts preparing for the world’s first interstellar voyage form one group; the other contains convicted murderers, sentenced to a virtual-reality prison. Naturally, disaster strikes, and, yup, they must work together to save Earth from destruction. Originally released as an Audible Original with Brendan Fraser as lead narrator, this is the first print edition of the Hugo and Nebula award-winning Sawyer’s 26 th novel.

The Ferryman by Justin Cronin

Just in case you still haven’t read it, Justin Cronin’s gloriously dreamy novel The Ferryman , set on an apparently utopian island where things aren’t quite as they seem, is out in paperback this month. It was the first pick for the New Scientist Book Club, and it is a mind-bending, dreamy stunner of a read. Go try it – and sign up for the Book Club in the meantime!

• science fiction /

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox! We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features

We live in a cosmic void so empty that it breaks the laws of cosmology

Subscriber-only

Annie Jacobsen: 'What if we had a nuclear war?’

Two brilliant new novels from adrian tchaikovsky show his range, popular articles.

Trending New Scientist articles