a conclusion for a research paper

Get science-backed answers as you write with Paperpal's Research feature

How to Write a Conclusion for Research Papers (with Examples)

The conclusion of a research paper is a crucial section that plays a significant role in the overall impact and effectiveness of your research paper. However, this is also the section that typically receives less attention compared to the introduction and the body of the paper. The conclusion serves to provide a concise summary of the key findings, their significance, their implications, and a sense of closure to the study. Discussing how can the findings be applied in real-world scenarios or inform policy, practice, or decision-making is especially valuable to practitioners and policymakers. The research paper conclusion also provides researchers with clear insights and valuable information for their own work, which they can then build on and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field.

The research paper conclusion should explain the significance of your findings within the broader context of your field. It restates how your results contribute to the existing body of knowledge and whether they confirm or challenge existing theories or hypotheses. Also, by identifying unanswered questions or areas requiring further investigation, your awareness of the broader research landscape can be demonstrated.

Remember to tailor the research paper conclusion to the specific needs and interests of your intended audience, which may include researchers, practitioners, policymakers, or a combination of these.

Table of Contents

What is a conclusion in a research paper, summarizing conclusion, editorial conclusion, externalizing conclusion, importance of a good research paper conclusion, how to write a conclusion for your research paper, research paper conclusion examples.

• How to write a research paper conclusion with Paperpal? 

Frequently Asked Questions

A conclusion in a research paper is the final section where you summarize and wrap up your research, presenting the key findings and insights derived from your study. The research paper conclusion is not the place to introduce new information or data that was not discussed in the main body of the paper. When working on how to conclude a research paper, remember to stick to summarizing and interpreting existing content. The research paper conclusion serves the following purposes: 1

• Warn readers of the possible consequences of not attending to the problem.
• Recommend specific course(s) of action.
• Restate key ideas to drive home the ultimate point of your research paper.
• Provide a “take-home” message that you want the readers to remember about your study.

Types of conclusions for research papers

In research papers, the conclusion provides closure to the reader. The type of research paper conclusion you choose depends on the nature of your study, your goals, and your target audience. I provide you with three common types of conclusions:

A summarizing conclusion is the most common type of conclusion in research papers. It involves summarizing the main points, reiterating the research question, and restating the significance of the findings. This common type of research paper conclusion is used across different disciplines.

An editorial conclusion is less common but can be used in research papers that are focused on proposing or advocating for a particular viewpoint or policy. It involves presenting a strong editorial or opinion based on the research findings and offering recommendations or calls to action.

An externalizing conclusion is a type of conclusion that extends the research beyond the scope of the paper by suggesting potential future research directions or discussing the broader implications of the findings. This type of conclusion is often used in more theoretical or exploratory research papers.

Align your conclusion’s tone with the rest of your research paper. Start Writing with Paperpal Now!  

The conclusion in a research paper serves several important purposes:

• Offers Implications and Recommendations : Your research paper conclusion is an excellent place to discuss the broader implications of your research and suggest potential areas for further study. It’s also an opportunity to offer practical recommendations based on your findings.
• Provides Closure : A good research paper conclusion provides a sense of closure to your paper. It should leave the reader with a feeling that they have reached the end of a well-structured and thought-provoking research project.
• Leaves a Lasting Impression : Writing a well-crafted research paper conclusion leaves a lasting impression on your readers. It’s your final opportunity to leave them with a new idea, a call to action, or a memorable quote.

Writing a strong conclusion for your research paper is essential to leave a lasting impression on your readers. Here’s a step-by-step process to help you create and know what to put in the conclusion of a research paper: 2

• Research Statement : Begin your research paper conclusion by restating your research statement. This reminds the reader of the main point you’ve been trying to prove throughout your paper. Keep it concise and clear.
• Key Points : Summarize the main arguments and key points you’ve made in your paper. Avoid introducing new information in the research paper conclusion. Instead, provide a concise overview of what you’ve discussed in the body of your paper.
• Address the Research Questions : If your research paper is based on specific research questions or hypotheses, briefly address whether you’ve answered them or achieved your research goals. Discuss the significance of your findings in this context.
• Significance : Highlight the importance of your research and its relevance in the broader context. Explain why your findings matter and how they contribute to the existing knowledge in your field.
• Implications : Explore the practical or theoretical implications of your research. How might your findings impact future research, policy, or real-world applications? Consider the “so what?” question.
• Future Research : Offer suggestions for future research in your area. What questions or aspects remain unanswered or warrant further investigation? This shows that your work opens the door for future exploration.
• Closing Thought : Conclude your research paper conclusion with a thought-provoking or memorable statement. This can leave a lasting impression on your readers and wrap up your paper effectively. Avoid introducing new information or arguments here.
• Proofread and Revise : Carefully proofread your conclusion for grammar, spelling, and clarity. Ensure that your ideas flow smoothly and that your conclusion is coherent and well-structured.

Write your research paper conclusion 2x faster with Paperpal. Try it now!

Remember that a well-crafted research paper conclusion is a reflection of the strength of your research and your ability to communicate its significance effectively. It should leave a lasting impression on your readers and tie together all the threads of your paper. Now you know how to start the conclusion of a research paper and what elements to include to make it impactful, let’s look at a research paper conclusion sample.

How to write a research paper conclusion with Paperpal?

A research paper conclusion is not just a summary of your study, but a synthesis of the key findings that ties the research together and places it in a broader context. A research paper conclusion should be concise, typically around one paragraph in length. However, some complex topics may require a longer conclusion to ensure the reader is left with a clear understanding of the study’s significance. Paperpal, an AI writing assistant trusted by over 800,000 academics globally, can help you write a well-structured conclusion for your research paper. 

• Sign Up or Log In: Create a new Paperpal account or login with your details.  
• Navigate to Features : Once logged in, head over to the features’ side navigation pane. Click on Templates and you’ll find a suite of generative AI features to help you write better, faster.  
• Generate an outline: Under Templates, select ‘Outlines’. Choose ‘Research article’ as your document type.  
• Select your section: Since you’re focusing on the conclusion, select this section when prompted.  
• Choose your field of study: Identifying your field of study allows Paperpal to provide more targeted suggestions, ensuring the relevance of your conclusion to your specific area of research. 
• Provide a brief description of your study: Enter details about your research topic and findings. This information helps Paperpal generate a tailored outline that aligns with your paper’s content. 
• Generate the conclusion outline: After entering all necessary details, click on ‘generate’. Paperpal will then create a structured outline for your conclusion, to help you start writing and build upon the outline.  
• Write your conclusion: Use the generated outline to build your conclusion. The outline serves as a guide, ensuring you cover all critical aspects of a strong conclusion, from summarizing key findings to highlighting the research’s implications. 
• Refine and enhance: Paperpal’s ‘Make Academic’ feature can be particularly useful in the final stages. Select any paragraph of your conclusion and use this feature to elevate the academic tone, ensuring your writing is aligned to the academic journal standards. 

By following these steps, Paperpal not only simplifies the process of writing a research paper conclusion but also ensures it is impactful, concise, and aligned with academic standards. Sign up with Paperpal today and write your research paper conclusion 2x faster .  

The research paper conclusion is a crucial part of your paper as it provides the final opportunity to leave a strong impression on your readers. In the research paper conclusion, summarize the main points of your research paper by restating your research statement, highlighting the most important findings, addressing the research questions or objectives, explaining the broader context of the study, discussing the significance of your findings, providing recommendations if applicable, and emphasizing the takeaway message. The main purpose of the conclusion is to remind the reader of the main point or argument of your paper and to provide a clear and concise summary of the key findings and their implications. All these elements should feature on your list of what to put in the conclusion of a research paper to create a strong final statement for your work.

A strong conclusion is a critical component of a research paper, as it provides an opportunity to wrap up your arguments, reiterate your main points, and leave a lasting impression on your readers. Here are the key elements of a strong research paper conclusion: 1. Conciseness : A research paper conclusion should be concise and to the point. It should not introduce new information or ideas that were not discussed in the body of the paper. 2. Summarization : The research paper conclusion should be comprehensive enough to give the reader a clear understanding of the research’s main contributions. 3 . Relevance : Ensure that the information included in the research paper conclusion is directly relevant to the research paper’s main topic and objectives; avoid unnecessary details. 4 . Connection to the Introduction : A well-structured research paper conclusion often revisits the key points made in the introduction and shows how the research has addressed the initial questions or objectives. 5. Emphasis : Highlight the significance and implications of your research. Why is your study important? What are the broader implications or applications of your findings? 6 . Call to Action : Include a call to action or a recommendation for future research or action based on your findings.

The length of a research paper conclusion can vary depending on several factors, including the overall length of the paper, the complexity of the research, and the specific journal requirements. While there is no strict rule for the length of a conclusion, but it’s generally advisable to keep it relatively short. A typical research paper conclusion might be around 5-10% of the paper’s total length. For example, if your paper is 10 pages long, the conclusion might be roughly half a page to one page in length.

In general, you do not need to include citations in the research paper conclusion. Citations are typically reserved for the body of the paper to support your arguments and provide evidence for your claims. However, there may be some exceptions to this rule: 1. If you are drawing a direct quote or paraphrasing a specific source in your research paper conclusion, you should include a citation to give proper credit to the original author. 2. If your conclusion refers to or discusses specific research, data, or sources that are crucial to the overall argument, citations can be included to reinforce your conclusion’s validity.

The conclusion of a research paper serves several important purposes: 1. Summarize the Key Points 2. Reinforce the Main Argument 3. Provide Closure 4. Offer Insights or Implications 5. Engage the Reader. 6. Reflect on Limitations

Remember that the primary purpose of the research paper conclusion is to leave a lasting impression on the reader, reinforcing the key points and providing closure to your research. It’s often the last part of the paper that the reader will see, so it should be strong and well-crafted.

• Makar, G., Foltz, C., Lendner, M., & Vaccaro, A. R. (2018). How to write effective discussion and conclusion sections. Clinical spine surgery, 31(8), 345-346.
• Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters.  Journal of English for academic purposes ,  4 (3), 207-224.

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!  

Related Reads:

• 5 Reasons for Rejection After Peer Review
• Ethical Research Practices For Research with Human Subjects

7 Ways to Improve Your Academic Writing Process

• Paraphrasing in Academic Writing: Answering Top Author Queries

Preflight For Editorial Desk: The Perfect Hybrid (AI + Human) Assistance Against Compromised Manuscripts

You may also like, mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to write a high-quality conference paper, academic editing: how to self-edit academic text with..., measuring academic success: definition & strategies for excellence, phd qualifying exam: tips for success , ai in education: it’s time to change the..., is it ethical to use ai-generated abstracts without..., what are journal guidelines on using generative ai..., quillbot review: features, pricing, and free alternatives, what is an academic paper types and elements .

In a short paper—even a research paper—you don’t need to provide an exhaustive summary as part of your conclusion. But you do need to make some kind of transition between your final body paragraph and your concluding paragraph. This may come in the form of a few sentences of summary. Or it may come in the form of a sentence that brings your readers back to your thesis or main idea and reminds your readers where you began and how far you have traveled.

So, for example, in a paper about the relationship between ADHD and rejection sensitivity, Vanessa Roser begins by introducing readers to the fact that researchers have studied the relationship between the two conditions and then provides her explanation of that relationship. Here’s her thesis: “While socialization may indeed be an important factor in RS, I argue that individuals with ADHD may also possess a neurological predisposition to RS that is exacerbated by the differing executive and emotional regulation characteristic of ADHD.”

In her final paragraph, Roser reminds us of where she started by echoing her thesis: “This literature demonstrates that, as with many other conditions, ADHD and RS share a delicately intertwined pattern of neurological similarities that is rooted in the innate biology of an individual’s mind, a connection that cannot be explained in full by the behavioral mediation hypothesis.”  

Highlight the “so what”  

At the beginning of your paper, you explain to your readers what’s at stake—why they should care about the argument you’re making. In your conclusion, you can bring readers back to those stakes by reminding them why your argument is important in the first place. You can also draft a few sentences that put those stakes into a new or broader context.

In the conclusion to her paper about ADHD and RS, Roser echoes the stakes she established in her introduction—that research into connections between ADHD and RS has led to contradictory results, raising questions about the “behavioral mediation hypothesis.”

She writes, “as with many other conditions, ADHD and RS share a delicately intertwined pattern of neurological similarities that is rooted in the innate biology of an individual’s mind, a connection that cannot be explained in full by the behavioral mediation hypothesis.”  

Leave your readers with the “now what”  

After the “what” and the “so what,” you should leave your reader with some final thoughts. If you have written a strong introduction, your readers will know why you have been arguing what you have been arguing—and why they should care. And if you’ve made a good case for your thesis, then your readers should be in a position to see things in a new way, understand new questions, or be ready for something that they weren’t ready for before they read your paper.

In her conclusion, Roser offers two “now what” statements. First, she explains that it is important to recognize that the flawed behavioral mediation hypothesis “seems to place a degree of fault on the individual. It implies that individuals with ADHD must have elicited such frequent or intense rejection by virtue of their inadequate social skills, erasing the possibility that they may simply possess a natural sensitivity to emotion.” She then highlights the broader implications for treatment of people with ADHD, noting that recognizing the actual connection between rejection sensitivity and ADHD “has profound implications for understanding how individuals with ADHD might best be treated in educational settings, by counselors, family, peers, or even society as a whole.”

To find your own “now what” for your essay’s conclusion, try asking yourself these questions:

• What can my readers now understand, see in a new light, or grapple with that they would not have understood in the same way before reading my paper? Are we a step closer to understanding a larger phenomenon or to understanding why what was at stake is so important?  
• What questions can I now raise that would not have made sense at the beginning of my paper? Questions for further research? Other ways that this topic could be approached?  
• Are there other applications for my research? Could my questions be asked about different data in a different context? Could I use my methods to answer a different question?  
• What action should be taken in light of this argument? What action do I predict will be taken or could lead to a solution?  
• What larger context might my argument be a part of?  

What to avoid in your conclusion  

• a complete restatement of all that you have said in your paper.  
• a substantial counterargument that you do not have space to refute; you should introduce counterarguments before your conclusion.  
• an apology for what you have not said. If you need to explain the scope of your paper, you should do this sooner—but don’t apologize for what you have not discussed in your paper.  
• fake transitions like “in conclusion” that are followed by sentences that aren’t actually conclusions. (“In conclusion, I have now demonstrated that my thesis is correct.”)
• picture_as_pdf Conclusions

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 9. The Conclusion
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

The conclusion is intended to help the reader understand why your research should matter to them after they have finished reading the paper. A conclusion is not merely a summary of the main topics covered or a re-statement of your research problem, but a synthesis of key points derived from the findings of your study and, if applicable, where you recommend new areas for future research. For most college-level research papers, two or three well-developed paragraphs is sufficient for a conclusion, although in some cases, more paragraphs may be required in describing the key findings and their significance.

Conclusions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Conclusions. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University.

Importance of a Good Conclusion

A well-written conclusion provides you with important opportunities to demonstrate to the reader your understanding of the research problem. These include:

• Presenting the last word on the issues you raised in your paper . Just as the introduction gives a first impression to your reader, the conclusion offers a chance to leave a lasting impression. Do this, for example, by highlighting key findings in your analysis that advance new understanding about the research problem, that are unusual or unexpected, or that have important implications applied to practice.
• Summarizing your thoughts and conveying the larger significance of your study . The conclusion is an opportunity to succinctly re-emphasize  your answer to the "So What?" question by placing the study within the context of how your research advances past research about the topic.
• Identifying how a gap in the literature has been addressed . The conclusion can be where you describe how a previously identified gap in the literature [first identified in your literature review section] has been addressed by your research and why this contribution is significant.
• Demonstrating the importance of your ideas . Don't be shy. The conclusion offers an opportunity to elaborate on the impact and significance of your findings. This is particularly important if your study approached examining the research problem from an unusual or innovative perspective.
• Introducing possible new or expanded ways of thinking about the research problem . This does not refer to introducing new information [which should be avoided], but to offer new insight and creative approaches for framing or contextualizing the research problem based on the results of your study.

Bunton, David. “The Structure of PhD Conclusion Chapters.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (July 2005): 207–224; Conclusions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Kretchmer, Paul. Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Conclusion. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008; Conclusions. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Assan, Joseph. "Writing the Conclusion Chapter: The Good, the Bad and the Missing." Liverpool: Development Studies Association (2009): 1-8.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  General Rules

The general function of your paper's conclusion is to restate the main argument . It reminds the reader of the strengths of your main argument(s) and reiterates the most important evidence supporting those argument(s). Do this by clearly summarizing the context, background, and necessity of pursuing the research problem you investigated in relation to an issue, controversy, or a gap found in the literature. However, make sure that your conclusion is not simply a repetitive summary of the findings. This reduces the impact of the argument(s) you have developed in your paper.

When writing the conclusion to your paper, follow these general rules:

• Present your conclusions in clear, concise language. Re-state the purpose of your study, then describe how your findings differ or support those of other studies and why [i.e., what were the unique, new, or crucial contributions your study made to the overall research about your topic?].
• Do not simply reiterate your findings or the discussion of your results. Provide a synthesis of arguments presented in the paper to show how these converge to address the research problem and the overall objectives of your study.
• Indicate opportunities for future research if you haven't already done so in the discussion section of your paper. Highlighting the need for further research provides the reader with evidence that you have an in-depth awareness of the research problem but that further investigations should take place beyond the scope of your investigation.

Consider the following points to help ensure your conclusion is presented well:

• If the argument or purpose of your paper is complex, you may need to summarize the argument for your reader.
• If, prior to your conclusion, you have not yet explained the significance of your findings or if you are proceeding inductively, use the end of your paper to describe your main points and explain their significance.
• Move from a detailed to a general level of consideration that returns the topic to the context provided by the introduction or within a new context that emerges from the data [this is opposite of the introduction, which begins with general discussion of the context and ends with a detailed description of the research problem]. 

The conclusion also provides a place for you to persuasively and succinctly restate the research problem, given that the reader has now been presented with all the information about the topic . Depending on the discipline you are writing in, the concluding paragraph may contain your reflections on the evidence presented. However, the nature of being introspective about the research you have conducted will depend on the topic and whether your professor wants you to express your observations in this way. If asked to think introspectively about the topics, do not delve into idle speculation. Being introspective means looking within yourself as an author to try and understand an issue more deeply, not to guess at possible outcomes or make up scenarios not supported by the evidence.

II.  Developing a Compelling Conclusion

Although an effective conclusion needs to be clear and succinct, it does not need to be written passively or lack a compelling narrative. Strategies to help you move beyond merely summarizing the key points of your research paper may include any of the following:

• If your essay deals with a critical, contemporary problem, warn readers of the possible consequences of not attending to the problem proactively.
• Recommend a specific course or courses of action that, if adopted, could address a specific problem in practice or in the development of new knowledge leading to positive change.
• Cite a relevant quotation or expert opinion already noted in your paper in order to lend authority and support to the conclusion(s) you have reached [a good source would be from your literature review].
• Explain the consequences of your research in a way that elicits action or demonstrates urgency in seeking change.
• Restate a key statistic, fact, or visual image to emphasize the most important finding of your paper.
• If your discipline encourages personal reflection, illustrate your concluding point by drawing from your own life experiences.
• Return to an anecdote, an example, or a quotation that you presented in your introduction, but add further insight derived from the findings of your study; use your interpretation of results from your study to recast it in new or important ways.
• Provide a "take-home" message in the form of a succinct, declarative statement that you want the reader to remember about your study.

III. Problems to Avoid

Failure to be concise Your conclusion section should be concise and to the point. Conclusions that are too lengthy often have unnecessary information in them. The conclusion is not the place for details about your methodology or results. Although you should give a summary of what was learned from your research, this summary should be relatively brief, since the emphasis in the conclusion is on the implications, evaluations, insights, and other forms of analysis that you make. Strategies for writing concisely can be found here .

Failure to comment on larger, more significant issues In the introduction, your task was to move from the general [the field of study] to the specific [the research problem]. However, in the conclusion, your task is to move from a specific discussion [your research problem] back to a general discussion framed around the implications and significance of your findings [i.e., how your research contributes new understanding or fills an important gap in the literature]. In short, the conclusion is where you should place your research within a larger context [visualize your paper as an hourglass--start with a broad introduction and review of the literature, move to the specific analysis and discussion, conclude with a broad summary of the study's implications and significance].

Failure to reveal problems and negative results Negative aspects of the research process should never be ignored. These are problems, deficiencies, or challenges encountered during your study. They should be summarized as a way of qualifying your overall conclusions. If you encountered negative or unintended results [i.e., findings that are validated outside the research context in which they were generated], you must report them in the results section and discuss their implications in the discussion section of your paper. In the conclusion, use negative results as an opportunity to explain their possible significance and/or how they may form the basis for future research.

Failure to provide a clear summary of what was learned In order to be able to discuss how your research fits within your field of study [and possibly the world at large], you need to summarize briefly and succinctly how it contributes to new knowledge or a new understanding about the research problem. This element of your conclusion may be only a few sentences long.

Failure to match the objectives of your research Often research objectives in the social and behavioral sciences change while the research is being carried out. This is not a problem unless you forget to go back and refine the original objectives in your introduction. As these changes emerge they must be documented so that they accurately reflect what you were trying to accomplish in your research [not what you thought you might accomplish when you began].

Resist the urge to apologize If you've immersed yourself in studying the research problem, you presumably should know a good deal about it [perhaps even more than your professor!]. Nevertheless, by the time you have finished writing, you may be having some doubts about what you have produced. Repress those doubts! Don't undermine your authority as a researcher by saying something like, "This is just one approach to examining this problem; there may be other, much better approaches that...." The overall tone of your conclusion should convey confidence to the reader about the study's validity and realiability.

Assan, Joseph. "Writing the Conclusion Chapter: The Good, the Bad and the Missing." Liverpool: Development Studies Association (2009): 1-8; Concluding Paragraphs. College Writing Center at Meramec. St. Louis Community College; Conclusions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Conclusions. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Freedman, Leora  and Jerry Plotnick. Introductions and Conclusions. The Lab Report. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Leibensperger, Summer. Draft Your Conclusion. Academic Center, the University of Houston-Victoria, 2003; Make Your Last Words Count. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin Madison; Miquel, Fuster-Marquez and Carmen Gregori-Signes. “Chapter Six: ‘Last but Not Least:’ Writing the Conclusion of Your Paper.” In Writing an Applied Linguistics Thesis or Dissertation: A Guide to Presenting Empirical Research . John Bitchener, editor. (Basingstoke,UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 93-105; Tips for Writing a Good Conclusion. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Kretchmer, Paul. Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Conclusion. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008; Writing Conclusions. Writing Tutorial Services, Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. Indiana University; Writing: Considering Structure and Organization. Institute for Writing Rhetoric. Dartmouth College.

Writing Tip

Don't Belabor the Obvious!

Avoid phrases like "in conclusion...," "in summary...," or "in closing...." These phrases can be useful, even welcome, in oral presentations. But readers can see by the tell-tale section heading and number of pages remaining that they are reaching the end of your paper. You'll irritate your readers if you belabor the obvious.

Assan, Joseph. "Writing the Conclusion Chapter: The Good, the Bad and the Missing." Liverpool: Development Studies Association (2009): 1-8.

Another Writing Tip

New Insight, Not New Information!

Don't surprise the reader with new information in your conclusion that was never referenced anywhere else in the paper. This why the conclusion rarely has citations to sources. If you have new information to present, add it to the discussion or other appropriate section of the paper. Note that, although no new information is introduced, the conclusion, along with the discussion section, is where you offer your most "original" contributions in the paper; the conclusion is where you describe the value of your research, demonstrate that you understand the material that you’ve presented, and position your findings within the larger context of scholarship on the topic, including describing how your research contributes new insights to that scholarship.

Assan, Joseph. "Writing the Conclusion Chapter: The Good, the Bad and the Missing." Liverpool: Development Studies Association (2009): 1-8; Conclusions. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina.

• << Previous: Limitations of the Study
• Next: Appendices >>
• Last Updated: May 30, 2024 9:38 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Paper Conclusion – Writing Guide and Examples

Research Paper Conclusion – Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

Research Paper Conclusion

Definition:

A research paper conclusion is the final section of a research paper that summarizes the key findings, significance, and implications of the research. It is the writer’s opportunity to synthesize the information presented in the paper, draw conclusions, and make recommendations for future research or actions.

The conclusion should provide a clear and concise summary of the research paper, reiterating the research question or problem, the main results, and the significance of the findings. It should also discuss the limitations of the study and suggest areas for further research.

Parts of Research Paper Conclusion

The parts of a research paper conclusion typically include:

Restatement of the Thesis

The conclusion should begin by restating the thesis statement from the introduction in a different way. This helps to remind the reader of the main argument or purpose of the research.

Summary of Key Findings

The conclusion should summarize the main findings of the research, highlighting the most important results and conclusions. This section should be brief and to the point.

Implications and Significance

In this section, the researcher should explain the implications and significance of the research findings. This may include discussing the potential impact on the field or industry, highlighting new insights or knowledge gained, or pointing out areas for future research.

Limitations and Recommendations

It is important to acknowledge any limitations or weaknesses of the research and to make recommendations for how these could be addressed in future studies. This shows that the researcher is aware of the potential limitations of their work and is committed to improving the quality of research in their field.

Concluding Statement

The conclusion should end with a strong concluding statement that leaves a lasting impression on the reader. This could be a call to action, a recommendation for further research, or a final thought on the topic.

How to Write Research Paper Conclusion

Here are some steps you can follow to write an effective research paper conclusion:

• Restate the research problem or question: Begin by restating the research problem or question that you aimed to answer in your research. This will remind the reader of the purpose of your study.
• Summarize the main points: Summarize the key findings and results of your research. This can be done by highlighting the most important aspects of your research and the evidence that supports them.
• Discuss the implications: Discuss the implications of your findings for the research area and any potential applications of your research. You should also mention any limitations of your research that may affect the interpretation of your findings.
• Provide a conclusion : Provide a concise conclusion that summarizes the main points of your paper and emphasizes the significance of your research. This should be a strong and clear statement that leaves a lasting impression on the reader.
• Offer suggestions for future research: Lastly, offer suggestions for future research that could build on your findings and contribute to further advancements in the field.

Remember that the conclusion should be brief and to the point, while still effectively summarizing the key findings and implications of your research.

Example of Research Paper Conclusion

Here’s an example of a research paper conclusion:

Conclusion :

In conclusion, our study aimed to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health among college students. Our findings suggest that there is a significant association between social media use and increased levels of anxiety and depression among college students. This highlights the need for increased awareness and education about the potential negative effects of social media use on mental health, particularly among college students.

Despite the limitations of our study, such as the small sample size and self-reported data, our findings have important implications for future research and practice. Future studies should aim to replicate our findings in larger, more diverse samples, and investigate the potential mechanisms underlying the association between social media use and mental health. In addition, interventions should be developed to promote healthy social media use among college students, such as mindfulness-based approaches and social media detox programs.

Overall, our study contributes to the growing body of research on the impact of social media on mental health, and highlights the importance of addressing this issue in the context of higher education. By raising awareness and promoting healthy social media use among college students, we can help to reduce the negative impact of social media on mental health and improve the well-being of young adults.

Purpose of Research Paper Conclusion

The purpose of a research paper conclusion is to provide a summary and synthesis of the key findings, significance, and implications of the research presented in the paper. The conclusion serves as the final opportunity for the writer to convey their message and leave a lasting impression on the reader.

The conclusion should restate the research problem or question, summarize the main results of the research, and explain their significance. It should also acknowledge the limitations of the study and suggest areas for future research or action.

Overall, the purpose of the conclusion is to provide a sense of closure to the research paper and to emphasize the importance of the research and its potential impact. It should leave the reader with a clear understanding of the main findings and why they matter. The conclusion serves as the writer’s opportunity to showcase their contribution to the field and to inspire further research and action.

When to Write Research Paper Conclusion

The conclusion of a research paper should be written after the body of the paper has been completed. It should not be written until the writer has thoroughly analyzed and interpreted their findings and has written a complete and cohesive discussion of the research.

Before writing the conclusion, the writer should review their research paper and consider the key points that they want to convey to the reader. They should also review the research question, hypotheses, and methodology to ensure that they have addressed all of the necessary components of the research.

Once the writer has a clear understanding of the main findings and their significance, they can begin writing the conclusion. The conclusion should be written in a clear and concise manner, and should reiterate the main points of the research while also providing insights and recommendations for future research or action.

Characteristics of Research Paper Conclusion

The characteristics of a research paper conclusion include:

• Clear and concise: The conclusion should be written in a clear and concise manner, summarizing the key findings and their significance.
• Comprehensive: The conclusion should address all of the main points of the research paper, including the research question or problem, the methodology, the main results, and their implications.
• Future-oriented : The conclusion should provide insights and recommendations for future research or action, based on the findings of the research.
• Impressive : The conclusion should leave a lasting impression on the reader, emphasizing the importance of the research and its potential impact.
• Objective : The conclusion should be based on the evidence presented in the research paper, and should avoid personal biases or opinions.
• Unique : The conclusion should be unique to the research paper and should not simply repeat information from the introduction or body of the paper.

Advantages of Research Paper Conclusion

The advantages of a research paper conclusion include:

• Summarizing the key findings : The conclusion provides a summary of the main findings of the research, making it easier for the reader to understand the key points of the study.
• Emphasizing the significance of the research: The conclusion emphasizes the importance of the research and its potential impact, making it more likely that readers will take the research seriously and consider its implications.
• Providing recommendations for future research or action : The conclusion suggests practical recommendations for future research or action, based on the findings of the study.
• Providing closure to the research paper : The conclusion provides a sense of closure to the research paper, tying together the different sections of the paper and leaving a lasting impression on the reader.
• Demonstrating the writer’s contribution to the field : The conclusion provides the writer with an opportunity to showcase their contribution to the field and to inspire further research and action.

Limitations of Research Paper Conclusion

While the conclusion of a research paper has many advantages, it also has some limitations that should be considered, including:

• I nability to address all aspects of the research: Due to the limited space available in the conclusion, it may not be possible to address all aspects of the research in detail.
• Subjectivity : While the conclusion should be objective, it may be influenced by the writer’s personal biases or opinions.
• Lack of new information: The conclusion should not introduce new information that has not been discussed in the body of the research paper.
• Lack of generalizability: The conclusions drawn from the research may not be applicable to other contexts or populations, limiting the generalizability of the study.
• Misinterpretation by the reader: The reader may misinterpret the conclusions drawn from the research, leading to a misunderstanding of the findings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

How to Cite Research Paper – All Formats and...

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Paper Format – Types, Examples and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

• Walden University
• Faculty Portal

Writing a Paper: Conclusions

Writing a conclusion.

A conclusion is an important part of the paper; it provides closure for the reader while reminding the reader of the contents and importance of the paper. It accomplishes this by stepping back from the specifics in order to view the bigger picture of the document. In other words, it is reminding the reader of the main argument. For most course papers, it is usually one paragraph that simply and succinctly restates the main ideas and arguments, pulling everything together to help clarify the thesis of the paper. A conclusion does not introduce new ideas; instead, it should clarify the intent and importance of the paper. It can also suggest possible future research on the topic.

An Easy Checklist for Writing a Conclusion

It is important to remind the reader of the thesis of the paper so he is reminded of the argument and solutions you proposed.

Think of the main points as puzzle pieces, and the conclusion is where they all fit together to create a bigger picture. The reader should walk away with the bigger picture in mind.

Make sure that the paper places its findings in the context of real social change.

Make sure the reader has a distinct sense that the paper has come to an end. It is important to not leave the reader hanging. (You don’t want her to have flip-the-page syndrome, where the reader turns the page, expecting the paper to continue. The paper should naturally come to an end.)

No new ideas should be introduced in the conclusion. It is simply a review of the material that is already present in the paper. The only new idea would be the suggesting of a direction for future research.

Conclusion Example

As addressed in my analysis of recent research, the advantages of a later starting time for high school students significantly outweigh the disadvantages. A later starting time would allow teens more time to sleep--something that is important for their physical and mental health--and ultimately improve their academic performance and behavior. The added transportation costs that result from this change can be absorbed through energy savings. The beneficial effects on the students’ academic performance and behavior validate this decision, but its effect on student motivation is still unknown. I would encourage an in-depth look at the reactions of students to such a change. This sort of study would help determine the actual effects of a later start time on the time management and sleep habits of students.

Related Webinar

Didn't find what you need? Email us at [email protected] .

• Previous Page: Thesis Statements
• Next Page: Writer's Block
• Office of Student Disability Services

Walden Resources

Departments.

• Academic Residencies
• Academic Skills
• Career Planning and Development
• Customer Care Team
• Field Experience
• Military Services
• Student Success Advising
• Writing Skills

Centers and Offices

• Center for Social Change
• Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services
• Office of Degree Acceleration
• Office of Research and Doctoral Services
• Office of Student Affairs

Student Resources

• Doctoral Writing Assessment
• Form & Style Review
• Quick Answers
• ScholarWorks
• SKIL Courses and Workshops
• Walden Bookstore
• Walden Catalog & Student Handbook
• Student Safety/Title IX
• Legal & Consumer Information
• Website Terms and Conditions
• Cookie Policy
• Accessibility
• Accreditation
• State Authorization
• Net Price Calculator
• Contact Walden

Walden University is a member of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. www.adtalem.com Walden University is certified to operate by SCHEV © 2024 Walden University LLC. All rights reserved.

Conclusions

What this handout is about.

This handout will explain the functions of conclusions, offer strategies for writing effective ones, help you evaluate conclusions you’ve drafted, and suggest approaches to avoid.

About conclusions

Introductions and conclusions can be difficult to write, but they’re worth investing time in. They can have a significant influence on a reader’s experience of your paper.

Just as your introduction acts as a bridge that transports your readers from their own lives into the “place” of your analysis, your conclusion can provide a bridge to help your readers make the transition back to their daily lives. Such a conclusion will help them see why all your analysis and information should matter to them after they put the paper down.

Your conclusion is your chance to have the last word on the subject. The conclusion allows you to have the final say on the issues you have raised in your paper, to synthesize your thoughts, to demonstrate the importance of your ideas, and to propel your reader to a new view of the subject. It is also your opportunity to make a good final impression and to end on a positive note.

Your conclusion can go beyond the confines of the assignment. The conclusion pushes beyond the boundaries of the prompt and allows you to consider broader issues, make new connections, and elaborate on the significance of your findings.

Your conclusion should make your readers glad they read your paper. Your conclusion gives your reader something to take away that will help them see things differently or appreciate your topic in personally relevant ways. It can suggest broader implications that will not only interest your reader, but also enrich your reader’s life in some way. It is your gift to the reader.

Strategies for writing an effective conclusion

One or more of the following strategies may help you write an effective conclusion:

• Play the “So What” Game. If you’re stuck and feel like your conclusion isn’t saying anything new or interesting, ask a friend to read it with you. Whenever you make a statement from your conclusion, ask the friend to say, “So what?” or “Why should anybody care?” Then ponder that question and answer it. Here’s how it might go: You: Basically, I’m just saying that education was important to Douglass. Friend: So what? You: Well, it was important because it was a key to him feeling like a free and equal citizen. Friend: Why should anybody care? You: That’s important because plantation owners tried to keep slaves from being educated so that they could maintain control. When Douglass obtained an education, he undermined that control personally. You can also use this strategy on your own, asking yourself “So What?” as you develop your ideas or your draft.
• Return to the theme or themes in the introduction. This strategy brings the reader full circle. For example, if you begin by describing a scenario, you can end with the same scenario as proof that your essay is helpful in creating a new understanding. You may also refer to the introductory paragraph by using key words or parallel concepts and images that you also used in the introduction.
• Synthesize, don’t summarize. Include a brief summary of the paper’s main points, but don’t simply repeat things that were in your paper. Instead, show your reader how the points you made and the support and examples you used fit together. Pull it all together.
• Include a provocative insight or quotation from the research or reading you did for your paper.
• Propose a course of action, a solution to an issue, or questions for further study. This can redirect your reader’s thought process and help them to apply your info and ideas to their own life or to see the broader implications.
• Point to broader implications. For example, if your paper examines the Greensboro sit-ins or another event in the Civil Rights Movement, you could point out its impact on the Civil Rights Movement as a whole. A paper about the style of writer Virginia Woolf could point to her influence on other writers or on later feminists.

Strategies to avoid

• Beginning with an unnecessary, overused phrase such as “in conclusion,” “in summary,” or “in closing.” Although these phrases can work in speeches, they come across as wooden and trite in writing.
• Stating the thesis for the very first time in the conclusion.
• Introducing a new idea or subtopic in your conclusion.
• Ending with a rephrased thesis statement without any substantive changes.
• Making sentimental, emotional appeals that are out of character with the rest of an analytical paper.
• Including evidence (quotations, statistics, etc.) that should be in the body of the paper.

Four kinds of ineffective conclusions

• The “That’s My Story and I’m Sticking to It” Conclusion. This conclusion just restates the thesis and is usually painfully short. It does not push the ideas forward. People write this kind of conclusion when they can’t think of anything else to say. Example: In conclusion, Frederick Douglass was, as we have seen, a pioneer in American education, proving that education was a major force for social change with regard to slavery.
• The “Sherlock Holmes” Conclusion. Sometimes writers will state the thesis for the very first time in the conclusion. You might be tempted to use this strategy if you don’t want to give everything away too early in your paper. You may think it would be more dramatic to keep the reader in the dark until the end and then “wow” them with your main idea, as in a Sherlock Holmes mystery. The reader, however, does not expect a mystery, but an analytical discussion of your topic in an academic style, with the main argument (thesis) stated up front. Example: (After a paper that lists numerous incidents from the book but never says what these incidents reveal about Douglass and his views on education): So, as the evidence above demonstrates, Douglass saw education as a way to undermine the slaveholders’ power and also an important step toward freedom.
• The “America the Beautiful”/”I Am Woman”/”We Shall Overcome” Conclusion. This kind of conclusion usually draws on emotion to make its appeal, but while this emotion and even sentimentality may be very heartfelt, it is usually out of character with the rest of an analytical paper. A more sophisticated commentary, rather than emotional praise, would be a more fitting tribute to the topic. Example: Because of the efforts of fine Americans like Frederick Douglass, countless others have seen the shining beacon of light that is education. His example was a torch that lit the way for others. Frederick Douglass was truly an American hero.
• The “Grab Bag” Conclusion. This kind of conclusion includes extra information that the writer found or thought of but couldn’t integrate into the main paper. You may find it hard to leave out details that you discovered after hours of research and thought, but adding random facts and bits of evidence at the end of an otherwise-well-organized essay can just create confusion. Example: In addition to being an educational pioneer, Frederick Douglass provides an interesting case study for masculinity in the American South. He also offers historians an interesting glimpse into slave resistance when he confronts Covey, the overseer. His relationships with female relatives reveal the importance of family in the slave community.

Works consulted

We consulted these works while writing this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial . We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback.

Douglass, Frederick. 1995. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself. New York: Dover.

Hamilton College. n.d. “Conclusions.” Writing Center. Accessed June 14, 2019. https://www.hamilton.edu//academics/centers/writing/writing-resources/conclusions .

Holewa, Randa. 2004. “Strategies for Writing a Conclusion.” LEO: Literacy Education Online. Last updated February 19, 2004. https://leo.stcloudstate.edu/acadwrite/conclude.html.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

• Link to facebook
• Link to linkedin
• Link to twitter
• Link to youtube
• Writing Tips

How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper

3-minute read

• 29th August 2023

If you’re writing a research paper, the conclusion is your opportunity to summarize your findings and leave a lasting impression on your readers. In this post, we’ll take you through how to write an effective conclusion for a research paper and how you can:

·   Reword your thesis statement

·   Highlight the significance of your research

·   Discuss limitations

·   Connect to the introduction

·   End with a thought-provoking statement

Rewording Your Thesis Statement

Begin your conclusion by restating your thesis statement in a way that is slightly different from the wording used in the introduction. Avoid presenting new information or evidence in your conclusion. Just summarize the main points and arguments of your essay and keep this part as concise as possible. Remember that you’ve already covered the in-depth analyses and investigations in the main body paragraphs of your essay, so it’s not necessary to restate these details in the conclusion.

Find this useful?

Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.

Highlighting the Significance of Your Research

The conclusion is a good place to emphasize the implications of your research . Avoid ambiguous or vague language such as “I think” or “maybe,” which could weaken your position. Clearly explain why your research is significant and how it contributes to the broader field of study.

Here’s an example from a (fictional) study on the impact of social media on mental health:

Discussing Limitations

Although it’s important to emphasize the significance of your study, you can also use the conclusion to briefly address any limitations you discovered while conducting your research, such as time constraints or a shortage of resources. Doing this demonstrates a balanced and honest approach to your research.

Connecting to the Introduction

In your conclusion, you can circle back to your introduction , perhaps by referring to a quote or anecdote you discussed earlier. If you end your paper on a similar note to how you began it, you will create a sense of cohesion for the reader and remind them of the meaning and significance of your research.

Ending With a Thought-Provoking Statement

Consider ending your paper with a thought-provoking and memorable statement that relates to the impact of your research questions or hypothesis. This statement can be a call to action, a philosophical question, or a prediction for the future (positive or negative). Here’s an example that uses the same topic as above (social media and mental health):

Expert Proofreading Services

Ensure that your essay ends on a high note by having our experts proofread your research paper. Our team has experience with a wide variety of academic fields and subjects and can help make your paper stand out from the crowd – get started today and see the difference it can make in your work.

Share this article:

Post A New Comment

Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.

9-minute read

How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation

Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...

8-minute read

Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement

Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...

7-minute read

Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization

Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...

4-minute read

Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio

Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...

How to Ace Slack Messaging for Contractors and Freelancers

Effective professional communication is an important skill for contractors and freelancers navigating remote work environments....

How to Insert a Text Box in a Google Doc

Google Docs is a powerful collaborative tool, and mastering its features can significantly enhance your...

Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications
• College University and Postgraduate
• Academic Writing
• Research Papers

How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper

Last Updated: May 8, 2024 Approved

This article was co-authored by Christopher Taylor, PhD . Christopher Taylor is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of English at Austin Community College in Texas. He received his PhD in English Literature and Medieval Studies from the University of Texas at Austin in 2014. wikiHow marks an article as reader-approved once it receives enough positive feedback. This article received 42 testimonials and 83% of readers who voted found it helpful, earning it our reader-approved status. This article has been viewed 2,260,251 times.

The conclusion of a research paper needs to summarize the content and purpose of the paper without seeming too wooden or dry. Every basic conclusion must share several key elements, but there are also several tactics you can play around with to craft a more effective conclusion and several you should avoid to prevent yourself from weakening your paper's conclusion. Here are some writing tips to keep in mind when creating a conclusion for your next research paper.

Sample Conclusions

Writing a basic conclusion.

• Do not spend a great amount of time or space restating your topic.
• A good research paper will make the importance of your topic apparent, so you do not need to write an elaborate defense of your topic in the conclusion.
• Usually a single sentence is all you need to restate your topic.
• An example would be if you were writing a paper on the epidemiology of infectious disease, you might say something like "Tuberculosis is a widespread infectious disease that affects millions of people worldwide every year."
• Yet another example from the humanities would be a paper about the Italian Renaissance: "The Italian Renaissance was an explosion of art and ideas centered around artists, writers, and thinkers in Florence."

• A thesis is a narrowed, focused view on the topic at hand.
• This statement should be rephrased from the thesis you included in your introduction. It should not be identical or too similar to the sentence you originally used.
• Try re-wording your thesis statement in a way that complements your summary of the topic of your paper in your first sentence of your conclusion.
• An example of a good thesis statement, going back to the paper on tuberculosis, would be "Tuberculosis is a widespread disease that affects millions of people worldwide every year. Due to the alarming rate of the spread of tuberculosis, particularly in poor countries, medical professionals are implementing new strategies for the diagnosis, treatment, and containment of this disease ."

• A good way to go about this is to re-read the topic sentence of each major paragraph or section in the body of your paper.
• Find a way to briefly restate each point mentioned in each topic sentence in your conclusion. Do not repeat any of the supporting details used within your body paragraphs.
• Under most circumstances, you should avoid writing new information in your conclusion. This is especially true if the information is vital to the argument or research presented in your paper.
• For example, in the TB paper you could summarize the information. "Tuberculosis is a widespread disease that affects millions of people worldwide. Due to the alarming rate of the spread of tuberculosis, particularly in poor countries, medical professionals are implementing new strategies for the diagnosis, treatment, and containment of this disease. In developing countries, such as those in Africa and Southeast Asia, the rate of TB infections is soaring. Crowded conditions, poor sanitation, and lack of access to medical care are all compounding factors in the spread of the disease. Medical experts, such as those from the World Health Organization are now starting campaigns to go into communities in developing countries and provide diagnostic testing and treatments. However, the treatments for TB are very harsh and have many side effects. This leads to patient non-compliance and spread of multi-drug resistant strains of the disease."

• Note that this is not needed for all research papers.
• If you already fully explained what the points in your paper mean or why they are significant, you do not need to go into them in much detail in your conclusion. Simply restating your thesis or the significance of your topic should suffice.
• It is always best practice to address important issues and fully explain your points in the body of your paper. The point of a conclusion to a research paper is to summarize your argument for the reader and, perhaps, to call the reader to action if needed.

• Note that a call for action is not essential to all conclusions. A research paper on literary criticism, for instance, is less likely to need a call for action than a paper on the effect that television has on toddlers and young children.
• A paper that is more likely to call readers to action is one that addresses a public or scientific need. Let's go back to our example of tuberculosis. This is a very serious disease that is spreading quickly and with antibiotic-resistant forms.
• A call to action in this research paper would be a follow-up statement that might be along the lines of "Despite new efforts to diagnose and contain the disease, more research is needed to develop new antibiotics that will treat the most resistant strains of tuberculosis and ease the side effects of current treatments."

• For example, if you are writing a history paper, then you might discuss how the historical topic you discussed matters today. If you are writing about a foreign country, then you might use the conclusion to discuss how the information you shared may help readers understand their own country.

Making Your Conclusion as Effective as Possible

• Since this sort of conclusion is so basic, you must aim to synthesize the information rather than merely summarizing it.
• Instead of merely repeating things you already said, rephrase your thesis and supporting points in a way that ties them all together.
• By doing so, you make your research paper seem like a "complete thought" rather than a collection of random and vaguely related ideas.

• Ask a question in your introduction. In your conclusion, restate the question and provide a direct answer.
• Write an anecdote or story in your introduction but do not share the ending. Instead, write the conclusion to the anecdote in the conclusion of your paper.
• For example, if you wanted to get more creative and put a more humanistic spin on a paper on tuberculosis, you might start your introduction with a story about a person with the disease, and refer to that story in your conclusion. For example, you could say something like this before you re-state your thesis in your conclusion: "Patient X was unable to complete the treatment for tuberculosis due to severe side effects and unfortunately succumbed to the disease."
• Use the same concepts and images introduced in your introduction in your conclusion. The images may or may not appear at other points throughout the research paper.

• Include enough information about your topic to back the statement up but do not get too carried away with excess detail.
• If your research did not provide you with a clear-cut answer to a question posed in your thesis, do not be afraid to indicate as much.
• Restate your initial hypothesis and indicate whether you still believe it or if the research you performed has begun swaying your opinion.
• Indicate that an answer may still exist and that further research could shed more light on the topic at hand.

• This may not be appropriate for all types of research papers. Most research papers, such as one on effective treatment for diseases, will have the information to make the case for a particular argument already in the paper.
• A good example of a paper that might ask a question of the reader in the ending is one about a social issue, such as poverty or government policy.
• Ask a question that will directly get at the heart or purpose of the paper. This question is often the same question, or some version of it, that you may have started with when you began your research.
• Make sure that the question can be answered by the evidence presented in your paper.
• If desired you can briefly summarize the answer after stating the question. You could also leave the question hanging for the reader to answer, though.

• Even without a call to action, you can still make a recommendation to your reader.
• For instance, if you are writing about a topic like third-world poverty, you can various ways for the reader to assist in the problem without necessarily calling for more research.
• Another example would be, in a paper about treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis, you could suggest donating to the World Health Organization or research foundations that are developing new treatments for the disease.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

• These sayings usually sound stiff, unnatural, or trite when used in writing.
• Moreover, using a phrase like "in conclusion" to begin your conclusion is a little too straightforward and tends to lead to a weak conclusion. A strong conclusion can stand on its own without being labeled as such.

• Always state the main argument or thesis in the introduction. A research paper is an analytical discussion of an academic topic, not a mystery novel.
• A good, effective research paper will allow your reader to follow your main argument from start to finish.
• This is why it is best practice to start your paper with an introduction that states your main argument and to end the paper with a conclusion that re-states your thesis for re-iteration.

• All significant information should be introduced in the body of the paper.
• Supporting evidence expands the topic of your paper by making it appear more detailed. A conclusion should narrow the topic to a more general point.
• A conclusion should only summarize what you have already stated in the body of your paper.
• You may suggest further research or a call to action, but you should not bring in any new evidence or facts in the conclusion.

• Most often, a shift in tone occurs when a research paper with an academic tone gives an emotional or sentimental conclusion.
• Even if the topic of the paper is of personal significance for you, you should not indicate as much in your paper.
• If you want to give your paper a more humanistic slant, you could start and end your paper with a story or anecdote that would give your topic more personal meaning to the reader.
• This tone should be consistent throughout the paper, however.

• Apologetic statements include phrases like "I may not be an expert" or "This is only my opinion."
• Statements like this can usually be avoided by refraining from writing in the first-person.
• Avoid any statements in the first-person. First-person is generally considered to be informal and does not fit with the formal tone of a research paper.

Community Q&A

You Might Also Like

• ↑ http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/724/04/
• ↑ http://www.crlsresearchguide.org/18_Writing_Conclusion.asp
• ↑ http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/PlanResearchPaper.html#conclusion
• ↑ http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/conclusions/
• ↑ http://writing2.richmond.edu/writing/wweb/conclude.html

About This Article

To write a conclusion for a research paper, start by restating your thesis statement to remind your readers what your main topic is and bring everything full circle. Then, briefly summarize all of the main points you made throughout your paper, which will help remind your readers of everything they learned. You might also want to include a call to action if you think more research or work needs to be done on your topic by writing something like, "Despite efforts to contain the disease, more research is needed to develop antibiotics." Finally, end your conclusion by explaining the broader context of your topic and why your readers should care about it, which will help them understand why your topic is relevant and important. For tips from our Academic co-author, like how to avoid common pitfalls when writing your conclusion, scroll down! Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Ummay Aimen

Sep 30, 2016

Did this article help you?

Oct 22, 2017

Sally Larrin

Mar 17, 2018

Maya Loeven

Jun 4, 2017

Sep 26, 2016

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

Don’t miss out! Sign up for

wikiHow’s newsletter

How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper

By the time you write the conclusion, you should have pointed out in the body of your research paper why your topic is important to the reader, and you should have presented the reader with all your arguments. It is critical that you do not introduce new information or ideas in your conclusion. If you find that you have not yet made the arguments you wished to make or pointed out evidence you feel is crucial to your reader’s understanding of your subject, you are not yet ready to write the conclusion; add another body paragraph before writing the conclusion.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code.

Your research paper should have a strong, succinct concluding section, where you draw together your findings. Think of it as a conclusion, not a summary. The difference is that you are reaching overall judgments about your topic, not summarizing everything you wrote about it. How to write a conclusion for a research paper? The focus should be on:

• Saying what your research has found, what the findings mean, and how well they support the argument of your thesis statement.
• Establishing the limits of your argument: How widely does it apply? What are the strengths and weaknesses of your method? How clear-cut are your findings?
• Explaining how your findings and argument fit into your field, relating them to answers others have given and to the existing literature.

You may also want to add some concise comments about possible future developments or what kind of research should come next, but don’t lay it on too thick. The place of honor goes to your own explanation. Don’t spend too much of your final section criticizing others. Don’t introduce any big new topics or ideas. You certainly don’t expect to see new characters in the last scene of a movie. For the same reasons, you shouldn’t find any big new topics being introduced in the last paragraphs of a research paper.

Your concluding statement should focus on what your findings mean. How do you interpret them? Are they just as easily explained by alternative theories or other perspectives? Here, you are returning to the questions that first animated you and answering them, based on your research. You not only want to give the answers; you also want to explain their significance. What do they mean for policy, theory, literary interpretation, moral action, or whatever? You are answering the old, hard question: “So what?”

Be wary of overreaching. You really need to do two things at the same time: explain the significance of your findings and stake out their limits. You may have a hunch that your findings apply widely but, as a social scientist, you need to assess whether you can say so confidently, based on your current research. Your reader needs to know: “Do these findings apply to all college students, to all adults, or only to white mice?” White mice don’t come up much in the humanities, but the reader still wants to know how far your approach reaches. Does your analysis apply only to this novel or this writer, or could it apply to a whole literary genre?

Make it a priority to discuss these conclusions with your professor or adviser. The main danger here is that students finally reach this final section with only a week or two left before the due date. They don’t have enough time to work through their conclusions and revise them. That leaves the research paper weakest at the end, precisely where it should be strongest, nailing down the most significant points.

Begin discussing your major findings with your adviser while you are still writing the heart of the research paper. Of course, your conclusions will be tentative at that stage, but it helps to begin talking about them. As always, a little writing helps. You could simply list your main findings or write out a few paragraphs about them. Either would serve as a launching pad for meetings with your adviser. You will find these discussions also shed light on the research that leads to these findings. That, in turn, will strengthen your middle sections. Later, when you draft the conclusion, review your notes on these talks and the short documents you wrote for them. They will serve as prewriting for the final section.

The opening sentence of the conclusion should flow smoothly and logically from the transition sentence in the previous paragraph and lead the reader to reflect on your thesis. A good conclusion however, does not simply restate the thesis. You want to remind the reader of the thesis in your conclusion but reword it in a stronger fashion so that it is interesting and memorable to your audience.After reminding the reader of the thesis, the conclusion should then reflect on the topics in the body of the paper and summarize the key findings of your research. If you are writing a persuasive paper, it should summarize your key arguments and logically point your readers to the conclusion you wish them to reach.

Phrases for Conclusions of Research Papers

• All this requires us to (propose the next action or an alternative idea).
• Altogether, these findings indicate (point out the logical result).
• Finally, it is important to note (make your strongest point and follow with a recommendation).
• In conclusion (restate your thesis with greater emphasis).
• It is evident that (point out the logical result or obvious next action).
• In light of the evidence, (restate your thesis with greater emphasis).
• In short, (summarize your findings).
• It should be evident that we need to (propose the next action or an alternative idea).
• In summary, (summarize your findings).
• Looking ahead, it is obvious that (propose the next action or an alternative idea).
• My conclusion is (restate your thesis with greater emphasis).
• One last word must be said. (Follow with your opinion and propose a next action.)
• One concludes that (give your opinion).
• Overall, (summarize your findings).
• Reflecting on these facts,we can see that …
• The evidence presented above shows that (give your opinion).
• The reader can conclude (make the point you wish to make).
• These facts and observations support the idea that (offer a theory).
• This analysis reveals (state your findings).
• To conclude, (give an opinion based on the findings presented in the paper).
• To sum up this discussion, (summarize your findings).
• To summarize, (summarize your findings).
• We arrive at the following conclusion: (give an opinion based on the findings presented in the paper).
• We cannot ignore the fact that (state an important concern and follow with a call to action).
• We can postulate (give your opinion or offer a theory).
• We come to the conclusion that (give your opinion or offer a theory).
• We can now present the theory that (give your opinion or offer a theory).

Examples of Strong Conclusions

As an example of how to end your research paper, let’s turn again to John Dower’s splendid book on postwar Japan, Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II . In the final pages, Dower pulls together his findings on war-ravaged Japan and its efforts to rebuild. He then judges the legacies of that period: its continuing impact on the country’s social, political, and economic life. Some insights are unexpected, at least to me. He argues that Japan has pursued trade protection as the only acceptable avenue for its persistent nationalism. America’s overwhelming power and Japan’s self-imposed restraints—the intertwined subjects of the book—blocked any political or military expression of Japan’s nationalist sentiment. Those avenues were simply too dangerous, he says, while economic nationalism was not. Dower ends with these paragraphs:

The Japanese economists and bureaucrats who drafted the informal 1946 blueprint for a planned economy were admirably clear on these objectives [of “demilitarization and democratization”]. They sought rapid recovery and maximum economic growth, of course—but they were just as concerned with achieving economic demilitarization and economic democracy. . . . Japan became wealthy. The standard of living rose impressively at every level of society. Income distribution was far more equitable than in the United States. Job security was assured. Growth was achieved without inordinate dependence on a military-industrial complex or a thriving trade in armaments. These are hardly trivial ideas, but they are now being discarded along with all the deservedly bankrupt aspects of the postwar system. The lessons and legacies of defeat have been many and varied indeed; and their end is not yet in sight. (John W. Dower, Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II . New York: W. W. Norton, 1999, pp. 563–64)

Remember the anecdotal opening of Herbert’s book Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society , with Henry Tuckerman’s 1867 arrival in a much-changed Paris? (see research paper introduction examples) Herbert strikes a completely different tone in his conclusion. It synthesizes the art history he has presented, offers a large judgment about where Impressionism fits among art movements, and suggests why exhibitions of Monet, Manet, and Renoir are still so popular. He manages to do all that in a few well-crafted sentences:

Although we credit [Impressionism] with being the gateway to modern art, we also treat it as the last of the great Western styles based upon a perception of harmony with natural vision. That harmony, long since lost to us in this century of urbanization, industrialization, and world wars, remains a longed-for idea, so we look back to Impressionism as the painting of a golden era. We flock into exhibitions of paintings that represent cafes, boating, promenading, and peaceful landscapes precisely because of our yearning for less troubled times. The only history that we feel deeply is the kind that is useful to us. Impressionism still looms large at the end of the twentieth century because we use its leisure-time subjects and its brilliantly colored surfaces to construct a desirable history. (Herbert, Impressionism , p. 306)

Robert Dallek offers similarly accessible, powerful judgments in his conclusion to Flawed Giant: Lyndon Johnson and His Times, 1961–1973 :

[Johnson’s] presidency was a story of great achievement and terrible failure, of lasting gains and unforgettable losses. . . . In a not so distant future, when coming generations have no direct experience of the man and the passions of the sixties are muted, Johnson will probably be remembered as a President who faithfully reflected the country’s greatness and limitations—a man notable for his successes and failures, for his triumphs and tragedy. Only one thing seems certain: Lyndon Johnson will not join the many obscure—almost nameless, faceless—Presidents whose terms of office register on most Americans as blank slates. He will not be forgotten. (Robert Dallek, Flawed Giant: Lyndon Johnson and His Times, 1961–1973 . New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 628)

Some writers not only synthesize their findings or compare them to others; they use the conclusion to say what their work means for appropriate methods or subject matter in their field. That is what Robert Bruegmann does in his final statement in The Architects and the City: Holabird & Roche of Chicago, 1880–1918 . His conclusion goes beyond saying that this was a great architectural firm or that it designed buildings of lasting importance. Bruegmann tells us that Holabird & Roche helped shape modern Chicago and that its work, properly studied, helps us understand “the city as the ultimate human artifact”:

Traditional architectural history has tended to see the city less as a process than as a product, a collection of high art architectural objects in a setting dominated by mundane buildings of little interest. This tended to perpetuate a destructive and divisive attitude about the built environment, suggesting that only a few buildings are worthy of careful study and preservation while all others are mere backdrop. I hope that these explorations in the work of Holabird & Roche have shed light on parts of the city rarely visited by the architectural historian and on some little explored aspects of its history. If so, perhaps it has achieved its most basic goal: providing an insight into the city as the ultimate human artifact, our most complex and prodigious social creation, and the most tangible result of the actions over time of all its citizens. (Robert Bruegmann, The Architects and the City: Holabird & Roche of Chicago, 1880–1918 . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997, p. 443)

These are powerful conclusions, ending major works of scholarship on a high note. What concluding paragraphs should never do is gaze off into the sunset, offer vague homilies, or claim you have found the meaning of human existence. Be concrete. Stick to your topic. Make sure your research paper conclusions stand on solid ground. Avoid vague platitudes in your conclusion. Your goal should be reaching strong, sound judgments, firmly grounded in your readings and research. Better to claim too little than too much. Best of all, claim what you’ve earned the right to say: what your research really means.

Having finished the main parts of a research paper you can write an abstract.

Back to  How To Write A Research Paper .

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

• Our Writers
• How to Order
• Assignment Writing Service
• Report Writing Service
• Buy Coursework
• Dissertation Writing Service
• Research Paper Writing Service
• All Essay Services
• Buy Research Paper
• Buy Term Paper
• Buy Dissertation
• Buy Case study
• Buy Presentation
• Buy Personal statement

Research Paper Guide

Research Paper Conclusion

Writing a Research Paper Conclusion - Step-by-Step Guide

People also read

Research Paper Writing - A Step by Step Guide

Research Paper Examples - Free Sample Papers for Different Formats!

Guide to Creating Effective Research Paper Outline

Interesting Research Paper Topics for 2024

Research Proposal Writing - A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Start a Research Paper - 7 Easy Steps

How to Write an Abstract for a Research Paper - A Step by Step Guide

Writing a Literature Review For a Research Paper - A Comprehensive Guide

Qualitative Research - Methods, Types, and Examples

8 Types of Qualitative Research - Overview & Examples

Qualitative vs Quantitative Research - Learning the Basics

200+ Engaging Psychology Research Paper Topics for Students in 2024

Learn How to Write a Hypothesis in a Research Paper: Examples and Tips!

20+ Types of Research With Examples - A Detailed Guide

Understanding Quantitative Research - Types & Data Collection Techniques

230+ Sociology Research Topics & Ideas for Students

How to Cite a Research Paper - A Complete Guide

Excellent History Research Paper Topics- 300+ Ideas

A Guide on Writing the Method Section of a Research Paper - Examples & Tips

How To Write an Introduction Paragraph For a Research Paper: Learn with Examples

Crafting a Winning Research Paper Title: A Complete Guide

Writing a Thesis For a Research Paper - A Comprehensive Guide

How To Write A Discussion For A Research Paper | Examples & Tips

How To Write The Results Section of A Research Paper | Steps & Examples

Writing a Problem Statement for a Research Paper - A Comprehensive Guide

Finding Sources For a Research Paper: A Complete Guide

A Guide on How to Edit a Research Paper

200+ Ethical Research Paper Topics to Begin With (2024)

300+ Controversial Research Paper Topics & Ideas - 2024 Edition

150+ Argumentative Research Paper Topics For You - 2024

How to Write a Research Methodology for a Research Paper

Finishing a research paper feels great, but getting to the end—especially the conclusion—can be a bit tricky. 

People often wonder, "How do I wrap up my findings nicely?" or "What tone should I use in the conclusion?" 

If you're dealing with these questions, you're not alone! Many researchers find writing a good conclusion a bit challenging since it's a crucial part that is meant to leave a strong impression on your readers.

No need to worry! 

In this guide, we'll show you how to write a conclusion that not only ties up your research paper neatly but also leaves a strong impression. We'll cover everything from summarizing effectively to creating the right feeling. 

So, let’s get started. 

• 1. What is a Research Paper Conclusion?
• 2. How to Write a Research Paper Conclusion: 7 Steps
• 3. Research Paper Conclusion Examples
• 4. Things to Avoid While Writing the Research Paper Conclusion

What is a Research Paper Conclusion?

A research paper conclusion is like the final chapter of your paper. It's where you bring everything together and leave a lasting impression on your readers. 

In simple terms, it's the last part where you sum up what you found during your research and explain why it matters. 

The conclusion isn't just a summary; it's a chance to make your research memorable and show its importance.

Types of Research Paper Conclusions

When it comes to writing the conclusion of your research paper, there isn't a one-size-fits-all approach. Different types of research papers call for different types of conclusions. Here are some common types:

• Summarizing Conclusion

This type recaps the key points and findings of your research. It's like giving your readers a quick overview of what you discovered without introducing new information. Summarizing conclusions works well for straightforward research papers.

• Reflective Conclusion

A reflective conclusion allows you to share your personal thoughts on the research process, challenges faced, and lessons learned. It adds a human touch to your paper, giving readers insight into your journey as a researcher.

• Open-ended Conclusion

Some research papers benefit from an open-ended conclusion that leaves room for further exploration. This type invites readers to think critically, ask questions, or even conduct additional research on the same topic.

How to Write a Research Paper Conclusion: 7 Steps

Writing an effective conclusion for your research paper involves more than just summarizing your findings. Follow these six essential steps to ensure your conclusion leaves a lasting impact:

Step 1: Restate the Research Problem

Start wrapping up your paper by going back to the main research question or issue you were investigating. 

Remind your readers about what you were trying to find out or understand. This gives your conclusion a clear connection to the original goal of your research, helping readers see the bigger picture.

Step 2: Revisit Your Thesis Statement

Go back to the main idea or argument you had in your paper—this is called your thesis statement. Double-check that your conclusion matches and supports what you wanted to prove or talk about in the beginning. 

This step is important because it keeps your conclusion connected to the main point of your research, making everything fit together nicely.

Step 3: Summarize Key Points

Give a short and clear recap of the most important things you found in your research. Keep it simple and stick to what you've already talked about—don't bring in new details now. 

The goal is to remind your readers of the important stuff you covered earlier. This helps to underline why your research is important and what you want them to take away from it.

Step 4: Discuss the Implications

Address the broader implications of your research. Explain why your findings matter and how they contribute to the existing body of knowledge in your field. 

Discuss the practical applications of your research and highlight any potential areas for further exploration.

Step 5: Connect with the Introduction

Create a seamless connection between your conclusion and the introduction. Referencing key elements from the introduction helps to create a cohesive narrative for your paper. 

This connection gives your research a sense of completeness and unity.

Step 6: Consider the "So What?" Factor

Ask yourself the question, "So what?" Why should readers care about your research? Clearly articulate the significance of your findings and their relevance to the broader academic or real-world context. 

Demonstrating the impact of your research adds depth to your conclusion.

Step 7: End with a Strong Closing Statement:

Conclude your research paper with a memorable closing statement. This could be a thought-provoking reflection, a call to action, or a suggestion for future research.

A strong closing leaves a lasting impression on your readers and emphasizes the importance of your work.

Research Paper Conclusion Examples

When it comes to writing a conclusion for your research paper, examining examples can offer valuable insights. Let’s take a look at this comprehensive example given below:

Still wondering how to write the conclusion for your research paper? Check out these examples for better understanding:

Conclusion For A Research Paper APA

Conclusion For A Research Paper Example Pdf

Conclusion For A Research Paper Pdf

Conclusion For A Research Paper Middle School

Conclusion For A Scientific Paper

Conclusion For A Research Paper Sample

Things to Avoid While Writing the Research Paper Conclusion

While crafting a conclusion for your research paper, it's crucial to steer clear of common pitfalls that can diminish the impact of your final remarks. 

Here are some things to avoid:

• Repetition: Avoid rehashing the exact language used in the introduction or body of your paper. A conclusion should summarize key points without duplicating content.
• Introducing New Information: Resist the temptation to introduce new ideas or data in the conclusion. This section is for summarizing existing content and reinforcing key findings.
• Overly Complex Language: Keep your conclusion clear and accessible. Avoid introducing overly complex or technical language that might confuse your readers.
• Lack of Connection to Introduction: Ensure that your conclusion ties back to the introduction. Failing to connect these sections can make your paper feel disjointed.
• Vague Statements: Steer clear of vague statements that lack substance. Clearly articulate the significance of your findings and their broader implications.
• Apologies or Excuses: Avoid including apologies or excuses for limitations in your research. While acknowledging limitations is important, the conclusion is not the place to dwell on them.
• New Arguments or Debates: The conclusion is not the space to introduce new debates or arguments. Keep the focus on summarizing your research and its implications.
• Abrupt Endings: A conclusion should not end abruptly. Instead, provide a thoughtful and well-rounded closing statement about the results of your study.

To sum it up, we've gone through important steps to make your research paper conclusion strong. We covered things like going back to your main question, talking about the most important points, and thinking about why your research matters in the real world.

Remember, a good ending is more than just a summary; it captures the heart of your research and answers the big "So what?" question. 

Remember, don't say the same things too much, don't add new details at the end, and keep your language simple!

If you ever need help with your academic writing, MyPerfectWords.com is here for you. Our expert writers are committed to helping you excel in your research papers and beyond. 

Take the next step towards academic success with MyPerfectWords.com, and hire our legit essay writing service  today!

Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!

Dr. Barbara is a highly experienced writer and author who holds a Ph.D. degree in public health from an Ivy League school. She has worked in the medical field for many years, conducting extensive research on various health topics. Her writing has been featured in several top-tier publications.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Keep reading

How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper

When you're wrapping up a research paper, the conclusion is like the grand finale of a fireworks show – it's your chance to leave a lasting impression. In this article, we'll break down the steps to help you write a winning research paper conclusion that not only recaps your main points but also ties everything together. Consider it the "So what?" moment – why should people care about your research? Our professional essay writers will guide you through making your conclusion strong, clear, and something that sticks with your readers long after they've put down your paper. So, let's dive in and ensure your research ends on a high note!

What Is a Conclusion in a Research Paper

In a research paper, the conclusion serves as the final segment, where you summarize the main points and findings of your study. It's not just a repetition of what you've already said but rather a chance to tie everything together and highlight the significance of your research. As you learn how to start a research paper , a good conclusion also often discusses the implications of your findings, suggests potential areas for further research, and leaves the reader with a lasting impression of the importance and relevance of your work in the broader context of the field. Essentially, it's your last opportunity to make a strong impact and leave your readers with a clear understanding of the significance of your research. Here’s a research paper conclusion example:

In conclusion, this research paper has navigated the intricacies of sustainable urban development, shedding light on the pivotal role of community engagement and innovative planning strategies. Through applying qualitative and quantitative research methods, we've uncovered valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities inherent in fostering environmentally friendly urban spaces. The implications of these findings extend beyond the confines of this study, emphasizing the imperative for continued exploration in the realms of urban planning and environmental sustainability. By emphasizing both the practical applications and theoretical contributions, this research underscores the significance of community involvement and forward-thinking strategies in shaping the future of urban landscapes. As cities evolve, incorporating these insights into planning and development practices will create resilient and harmonious urban environments.

Conclusion Outline for Research Paper

This outline for a research paper conclusion provides a structured framework to ensure that your ending effectively summarizes the key elements of your research paper and leaves a lasting impression on your readers. Adjust the content based on the specific requirements and focus of your research.

Restate the Thesis Statement

• Briefly restate the main thesis or research question.
• Emphasize the core objective or purpose of the study.

Summarize Key Findings

• Recap the main points and key findings from each section of the paper.
• Provide a concise overview of the research journey.

Discuss Implications

• Explore the broader implications of the research findings.
• Discuss how the results contribute to the existing body of knowledge in the field.

Address Limitations

• Acknowledge any limitations or constraints encountered during the research process.
• Explain how these limitations may impact the interpretation of the findings.

Suggest Areas for Future Research

• Propose potential directions for future studies related to the topic.
• Identify gaps in the current research that warrant further exploration.

Reaffirm Significance

• Reaffirm the importance and relevance of the research in the broader context.
• Highlight the practical applications or real-world implications of the study.

Concluding Statement

• Craft a strong, memorable closing statement that leaves a lasting impression.
• Sum up the overall impact of the research and its potential contribution to the field.

Study the full guide on how to make a research paper outline here, which will also specify the conclusion writing specifics to improve your general prowess.

Tips on How to Make a Conclusion in Research

Here are key considerations regarding a conclusion for research paper to not only recap the primary ideas in your work but also delve deeper to earn a higher grade:

• Provide a concise recap of your main research outcomes.
• Remind readers of your research goals and their accomplishments.
• Stick to summarizing existing content; refrain from adding new details.
• Emphasize why your research matters and its broader implications.
• Clearly explain the practical or theoretical impact of your findings.
• Prompt readers to reflect on how your research influences their perspective.
• Briefly discuss the robustness of your research methods.
• End with a suggestion for future research or a practical application.
• Transparently address any constraints or biases in your study.
• End on a powerful note, leaving a memorable impression on your readers.

For your inspiration, we’ve also prepared this research proposal example APA , which dwells on another important aspect of research writing.

How to Write a Research Paper Conclusion

As you finish your research paper, the conclusion takes center stage. In this section, we've got five practical tips for writing a conclusion for a research paper. We'll guide you through summarizing your key findings, revisiting your research goals, discussing the bigger picture, addressing any limitations, and ending on a powerful note. Think of it as your roadmap to creating a conclusion that not only wraps up your research but also leaves a lasting impact on your readers. Let's dive in and make sure your conclusion stands out for all the right reasons!

Synthesize Core Discoveries. Initiate your conclusion by synthesizing the essential discoveries of your research. Offer a succinct recapitulation of the primary points and outcomes you have elucidated in your paper. This aids in reinforcing the gravity of your work and reiterates the pivotal information you have presented.

Revisit Research Objectives. Revisit the research objectives or questions you outlined at the beginning of your paper. Assess whether you have successfully addressed these objectives and if your findings align with the initial goals of your research. This reflection helps tie your conclusion back to the purpose of your study.

Discuss Implications and Contributions. Discuss the broader implications of your research and its potential contributions to the field. Consider how your findings might impact future research, applications, or understanding of the subject matter. This demonstrates the significance of your work and places it within a larger context.

Address Limitations and Future Research. Acknowledge any limitations in your study, such as constraints in data collection or potential biases. Briefly discuss how these limitations might have affected your results. Additionally, suggest areas for future research that could build upon your work, addressing any unanswered questions or unexplored aspects. This demonstrates a thoughtful approach to your research.

End with a Strong Conclusion Statement. Conclude your research paper with a strong and memorable statement that reinforces the key message you want readers to take away. This could be a call to action, a proposal for further investigation, or a reflection on the broader significance of your findings. Leave your readers with a lasting impression that emphasizes the importance of your research. Remember that you can buy a research paper anytime if you lack time or get stuck in writer’s block.

Want to Enjoy the Benefits of Academic Freedom?

With our top-notch writers and 24/7 support, you can relax and focus on what really matters

Stylistic Devices to Use in a Conclusion

Discover distinctive stylistic insights that you can apply when writing a conclusion for a research paper:

• Rhetorical Questions. When using rhetorical questions, strategically place them to engage readers' minds. For instance, you might pose a question that prompts reflection on the broader implications of your findings, leaving your audience with something to ponder.
• Powerful Language. Incorporate strong language to convey a sense of conviction and importance. Choose words that resonate with the overall tone of your research and amplify the significance of your conclusions. This adds weight to your key messages.
• Repetitions. Repetitions can be employed to reinforce essential ideas. Reiterate key phrases or concepts in a way that emphasizes their importance without sounding redundant. This technique serves to drive home your main points.
• Anecdotes. Integrating anecdotes into your conclusion can provide a human touch. Share a brief and relevant story that connects with your research, making the information more relatable and memorable for your audience.
• Vivid Imagery. Lastly, use vivid imagery to paint a picture in the minds of your readers. Appeal to their senses by describing scenarios or outcomes related to your research. This creates a more immersive and lasting impression.

If you have a larger paper to write, for example a thesis, use our custom dissertation writing can help you in no time.

How to Make a Conclusion Logically Appealing

Knowing how to write a conclusion for a research paper that is logically appealing is important for leaving a lasting impression on your readers. Here are some tips to achieve this:

Logical Sequencing

• Present your conclusion in a structured manner, following the natural flow of your paper. Readers should effortlessly follow your thought process, making your conclusion more accessible and persuasive.

Reinforce Main Arguments

• Emphasize the core arguments and findings from your research. By reinforcing key points, you solidify your stance and provide a logical culmination to your paper.

Address Counterarguments

• Acknowledge and address potential counterarguments or limitations in your research. Demonstrate intellectual honesty and strengthen your conclusion by preemptively addressing potential doubts.

Connect with Introduction

• Revisit themes or concepts introduced in your introduction to create a cohesive narrative, allowing readers to trace the logical progression of your research from start to finish.

Propose Actionable Insights

• Suggest practical applications or recommendations based on your findings. This will add a forward-looking dimension, making your conclusion more relevant and compelling.

Highlight Significance

• Clearly articulate the broader implications of your research to convey the importance of your work and its potential impact on the field, making your conclusion logically compelling.

Are you ready to produce an A-grade assignment? If not, opt for a custom research paper from our skilled writers across various disciplines.

Avoid These Things When Writing a Research Paper Conclusion

As you write your conclusion of research paper, there’s a list of things professional writers don’t recommend doing. Consider these issues carefully:

• Repetition of Exact Phrases
• Repetitively using the same phrases or sentences from the main body. Repetition can make your conclusion seem redundant and less engaging.
• Overly Lengthy Summaries
• Providing excessively detailed summaries of each section of your paper. Readers may lose interest if the conclusion becomes too long and detailed.
• Unclear Connection to the Introduction
• Failing to connect the conclusion back to the introduction. A lack of continuity may make the paper feel disjointed.
• Adding New Arguments or Ideas
• Introducing new arguments or ideas that were not addressed in the body. This can confuse the reader and disrupt the coherence of your paper.
• Overuse of Complex Jargon
• Using excessively complex or technical language without clarification. Clear communication is essential in the conclusion, ensuring broad understanding.
• Apologizing or Undermining Confidence
• Apologizing for limitations or expressing doubt about your work. Maintain a confident tone; if limitations exist, present them objectively without undermining your research.
• Sweeping Generalizations
• Making overly broad or unsupported generalizations. Such statements can weaken the credibility of your conclusion.
• Neglecting the Significance
• Failing to emphasize the broader significance of your research. Readers need to understand why your findings matter in a larger context.
• Abrupt Endings
• Concluding abruptly without a strong closing statement. A powerful ending leaves a lasting impression; avoid a sudden or weak conclusion.

Research Paper Conclusion Example

That covers the essential aspects of summarizing a research paper. The only remaining step is to review the conclusion examples for research paper provided by our team.

Like our examples? Order our research proposal writing service to write paper according to your instructions to avoid plagiarizing and to keep your academic integrity strong.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, the knowledge of how to write the conclusion of a research paper is pivotal for presenting your findings and leaving a lasting impression on your readers. By summarizing the key points, reiterating the significance of your research, and offering avenues for future exploration, you can create a conclusion that not only reinforces the value of your study but also encourages further academic discourse. Remember to balance brevity and completeness, ensuring your conclusion is concise yet comprehensive. Emphasizing the practical implications of your research and connecting it to the broader academic landscape will help solidify the impact of your work. Pay someone to write a research paper if you are having a hard time finishing your coursework on time.

Tired of Stressing Over Endless Essays and Deadlines? 

Let us take the load off your shoulders! Order your custom research paper today and experience the relief of knowing that your assignment is in expert hands

How To Write A Conclusion For A Research Paper?

What should the conclusion of a research paper contain, how to start a conclusion paragraph for a research paper.

Daniel Parker

is a seasoned educational writer focusing on scholarship guidance, research papers, and various forms of academic essays including reflective and narrative essays. His expertise also extends to detailed case studies. A scholar with a background in English Literature and Education, Daniel’s work on EssayPro blog aims to support students in achieving academic excellence and securing scholarships. His hobbies include reading classic literature and participating in academic forums.

is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.

Related Articles

How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper

Find out which type of conclusion best suits your research, how to write it step-by-step, and common mistakes to avoid.

When writing a research paper, it can be challenging to make your point after providing an extensive amount of information. For this reason, a well-organized conclusion is essential. 

A research paper’s conclusion should be a brief summary of the paper’s substance and objectives; what you present in your research paper can gain impact by having a strong conclusion section.

In this Mind The Graph article, you will learn how to write a conclusion for a research report in a way that inspires action and helps the readers to better understand your research paper. This article will provide you the definition and some broad principles before providing step-by-step guidance.

What is a conclusion for a research paper and why is it important?

A conclusion is where you summarize the main points and, if appropriate, make new research suggestions. It is not merely a summary of the key points discussed or a rehash of your research question.

The reader is expected to comprehend from the article’s conclusion why your study should be significant to them after reading it. A conclusion of one or two well-developed paragraphs is appropriate for the majority of research papers; however, in a few unusual cases, more paragraphs may be required to highlight significant findings and their importance.

Just as the introduction is responsible for giving the reader a first impression on the subject, the conclusion is the chance to make a final impression by summarizing major information of your research paper and, most often, giving a different point of view on significant implications.

Adding a strong conclusion to your research paper is important because it’s a possibility to give the reader the comprehension of your research topic. Given that the reader is now fully informed on the subject, the conclusion also gives you a chance to restate the research problem effectively and concisely.

Examples of conclusions for a research paper

Now that you are aware of what a conclusion is and its significance for a research paper, it is time to provide you with some excellent samples of well-structured conclusions so you may get knowledge about the type of conclusion you can use for your research paper.

Argumentative Research Paper Conclusion

The most convincing arguments from your research paper should be added to the conclusion if you want to compose a strong argumentative conclusion.

Additionally, if your thesis statement expresses your perspective on the subject, you should think about restarting it as well as including any other pertinent information.

Example: As a result of the sixth extinction, which is currently affecting Earth, many species are vanishing every day. There are at least three strategies that people could employ to keep them from going extinct entirely in the ensuing fifty years. More recycling options, innovative plastic production techniques, and species preservation could save lives.

Analytical Research Paper Conclusion

The first thing you should do is reiterate your thesis and list the main elements of your arguments.

There should undoubtedly be a spotlight on a bigger context in the analytical research paper conclusion, which is the key distinction between it and other types of conclusions. It means you can add some meaning to the findings.

Example: Elon Musk has revolutionized the way we drive, pay for things, and even fly. His innovations are solely motivated by the desire to simplify things, but they inevitably alter the course of history. When Musk was a student, he had his first idea for PayPal, which is now among the most widely used methods of online payment. Likewise with Tesla automobiles.

Comparative Research Paper Conclusion

The conclusion of a comparative essay should be deeply analytical. To clearly express your conclusions, you must be very thorough when reviewing the data. Furthermore, the sources must be reliable.

A paraphrased thesis statement and a few sentences describing the significance of your study research are also required, as per normal.

Example: Gas-powered vehicles are ineffective and inefficient compared to electric vehicles. Not only do they emit fewer pollutants, but the drivers also get there more quickly. Additionally, gas cars cost more to maintain. Everything stems from the details of the far more straightforward engines used in electric cars.

How to write a conclusion for a research paper

In this section, you will learn how to write a conclusion for a research paper effectively and properly. These few easy steps will enable you to write the most convincing conclusion to your research paper.

1. Remember about the main topic

The statement must be written clearly and concisely to be effective, just one sentence. Remember that your conclusion should be concise and precise, expressing only the most important elements.

2. Reaffirm your thesis

Restate the research paper’s thesis after that. This can be done by going back to the original thesis that you presented in the research’s introduction. The thesis statement in your conclusion must be expressed differently from how it was in the introduction. This section can also be written effectively in a single sentence.

3. Sum important points in a summary

It’s time to make a list of the important arguments in your research paper. This phase can be made simpler by reading over your research and emphasizing only the main ideas and evidence.

Remember that the conclusion should not contain any new information. Focus only on the concepts you cover in your paper’s main body as a result. And also, keep in mind that this brief summary reminds your readers of the importance of the topic you are researching.

4. Emphasize the importance

At this stage, you can genuinely express a few words about how significant your arguments are. A succinct but impactful sentence can successfully achieve its aim. You could also attempt to examine this circumstance from a wider perspective.

Give an example of how your discoveries have affected a certain field. It would be beneficial if you made an effort to answer the question, “So what?” if there was any ambiguity.

5. Finish up your argument

As you wrap up your conclusion, consider posing a question or a call to action that will encourage readers to consider your point of view even further. This sentence can also answer any queries that were not addressed in the paper’s body paragraphs.

In addition, if there is an unresolved question in the main body, this is a fantastic area to comment on.

Common mistakes you should avoid

After learning the fundamentals of producing a strong research paper conclusion, it’s time to learn the common mistakes to avoid.

• Weak conclusion: If your ending is weak, readers will feel dissatisfied and disappointed. Writing ambiguous closing lines for essays also lowers the quality of the paper and the capacity of your arguments to support your main topic.
• Abrupt conclusion: Your research has to be an expression of your writing as a whole, not just a section. Therefore, make sure your thoughts are fully stated.
• Adding new information: Only your research should only be summarized in the conclusion. As the conclusion cannot contain extra information, make sure to offer all of your conclusions and supporting evidence in the body paragraphs.
• Absence of focus: A conclusion needs to be concise and well-focused. Avoid concluding the research with inane or superfluous details.
• Absurd length: Research must be of a proper length—neither too long nor too short. If you write more than is necessary, you can miss the point, which is to revisit the paper’s argument straightforwardly. Additionally, if you write too little, your readers will think you’re being negligent. It should be written in at least one or two whole paragraphs.

Communicate science visually with the power of infographics

Learn about the Mind the Graph tool, a tool to assist the scientific community in better-communicating ideas and data using amazing visual infographics and scientific figures .

Subscribe to our newsletter

Exclusive high quality content about effective visual communication in science.

Unlock Your Creativity

Create infographics, presentations and other scientifically-accurate designs without hassle — absolutely free for 7 days!

About Jessica Abbadia

Jessica Abbadia is a lawyer that has been working in Digital Marketing since 2020, improving organic performance for apps and websites in various regions through ASO and SEO. Currently developing scientific and intellectual knowledge for the community's benefit. Jessica is an animal rights activist who enjoys reading and drinking strong coffee.

Content tags

• Affiliate Program

• UNITED STATES
• 台灣 (TAIWAN)
• TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
• Academic Editing Services
• - Research Paper
• - Journal Manuscript
• - Dissertation
• - College & University Assignments
• Admissions Editing Services
• - Application Essay
• - Personal Statement
• - Recommendation Letter
• - Cover Letter
• - CV/Resume
• Business Editing Services
• - Business Documents
• - Report & Brochure
• - Website & Blog
• Writer Editing Services
• - Script & Screenplay
• Our Editors
• Client Reviews
• Editing & Proofreading Prices
• Wordvice Points
• Partner Discount
• Plagiarism Checker
• APA Citation Generator
• MLA Citation Generator
• Chicago Citation Generator
• Vancouver Citation Generator
• - APA Style
• - MLA Style
• - Chicago Style
• - Vancouver Style
• Writing & Editing Guide
• Academic Resources
• Admissions Resources

How to Write a Research Paper Conclusion Section

What is a conclusion in a research paper?

The conclusion in a research paper is the final paragraph or two in a research paper. In scientific papers, the conclusion usually follows the Discussion section , summarizing the importance of the findings and reminding the reader why the work presented in the paper is relevant.

However, it can be a bit confusing to distinguish the conclusion section/paragraph from a summary or a repetition of your findings, your own opinion, or the statement of the implications of your work. In fact, the conclusion should contain a bit of all of these other parts but go beyond it—but not too far beyond! 

The structure and content of the conclusion section can also vary depending on whether you are writing a research manuscript or an essay. This article will explain how to write a good conclusion section, what exactly it should (and should not) contain, how it should be structured, and what you should avoid when writing it.  

Table of Contents:

What does a good conclusion section do, what to include in a research paper conclusion.

• Conclusion in an Essay
• Research Paper Conclusion 
• Conclusion Paragraph Outline and Example
• What Not to Do When Writing a Conclusion

The conclusion of a research paper has several key objectives. It should:

• Restate your research problem addressed in the introduction section
• Summarize your main arguments, important findings, and broader implications
• Synthesize key takeaways from your study

The specific content in the conclusion depends on whether your paper presents the results of original scientific research or constructs an argument through engagement with previously published sources.

You presented your general field of study to the reader in the introduction section, by moving from general information (the background of your work, often combined with a literature review ) to the rationale of your study and then to the specific problem or topic you addressed, formulated in the form of the statement of the problem in research or the thesis statement in an essay.

In the conclusion section, in contrast, your task is to move from your specific findings or arguments back to a more general depiction of how your research contributes to the readers’ understanding of a certain concept or helps solve a practical problem, or fills an important gap in the literature. The content of your conclusion section depends on the type of research you are doing and what type of paper you are writing. But whatever the outcome of your work is, the conclusion is where you briefly summarize it and place it within a larger context. It could be called the “take-home message” of the entire paper.

What to summarize in the conclusion

Your conclusion section needs to contain a very brief summary of your work , a very brief summary of the main findings of your work, and a mention of anything else that seems relevant when you now look at your work from a bigger perspective, even if it was not initially listed as one of your main research questions. This could be a limitation, for example, a problem with the design of your experiment that either needs to be considered when drawing any conclusions or that led you to ask a different question and therefore draw different conclusions at the end of your study (compared to when you started out).

Once you have reminded the reader of what you did and what you found, you need to go beyond that and also provide either your own opinion on why your work is relevant (and for whom, and how) or theoretical or practical implications of the study , or make a specific call for action if there is one to be made.   

How to Write an Essay Conclusion

Academic essays follow quite different structures than their counterparts in STEM and the natural sciences. Humanities papers often have conclusion sections that are much longer and contain more detail than scientific papers. There are three main types of academic essay conclusions.

Summarizing conclusion

The most typical conclusion at the end of an analytical/explanatory/argumentative essay is a summarizing conclusion . This is, as the name suggests, a clear summary of the main points of your topic and thesis. Since you might have gone through a number of different arguments or subtopics in the main part of your essay, you need to remind the reader again what those were, how they fit into each other, and how they helped you develop or corroborate your hypothesis.

For an essay that analyzes how recruiters can hire the best candidates in the shortest time or on “how starving yourself will increase your lifespan, according to science”, a summary of all the points you discussed might be all you need. Note that you should not exactly repeat what you said earlier, but rather highlight the essential details and present those to your reader in a different way. 

Externalizing conclusion

If you think that just reminding the reader of your main points is not enough, you can opt for an externalizing conclusion instead, that presents new points that were not presented in the paper so far. These new points can be additional facts and information or they can be ideas that are relevant to the topic and have not been mentioned before.

Such a conclusion can stimulate your readers to think about your topic or the implications of your analysis in a whole new way. For example, at the end of a historical analysis of a specific event or development, you could direct your reader’s attention to some current events that were not the topic of your essay but that provide a different context for your findings.

Editorial conclusion

In an editorial conclusion , another common type of conclusion that you will find at the end of papers and essays, you do not add new information but instead present your own experiences or opinions on the topic to round everything up. What makes this type of conclusion interesting is that you can choose to agree or disagree with the information you presented in your paper so far. For example, if you have collected and analyzed information on how a specific diet helps people lose weight, you can nevertheless have your doubts on the sustainability of that diet or its practicability in real life—if such arguments were not included in your original thesis and have therefore not been covered in the main part of your paper, the conclusion section is the place where you can get your opinion across.    

How to Conclude an Empirical Research Paper

An empirical research paper is usually more concise and succinct than an essay, because, if it is written well, it focuses on one specific question, describes the method that was used to answer that one question, describes and explains the results, and guides the reader in a logical way from the introduction to the discussion without going on tangents or digging into not absolutely relevant topics.

Summarize the findings

In a scientific paper, you should include a summary of the findings. Don’t go into great detail here (you will have presented your in-depth  results  and  discussion  already), but do clearly express the answers to the  research questions  you investigated.

Describe your main findings, even if they weren’t necessarily the ones anticipated, and explain the conclusion they led you to. Explain these findings in as few words as possible.

Instead of beginning with “ In conclusion, in this study, we investigated the effect of stress on the brain using fMRI …”, you should try to find a way to incorporate the repetition of the essential (and only the essential) details into the summary of the key points. “ The findings of this fMRI study on the effect of stress on the brain suggest that …” or “ While it has been known for a long time that stress has an effect on the brain, the findings of this fMRI study show that, surprisingly… ” would be better ways to start a conclusion. 

You should also not bring up new ideas or present new facts in the conclusion of a research paper, but stick to the background information you have presented earlier, to the findings you have already discussed, and the limitations and implications you have already described. The one thing you can add here is a practical recommendation that you haven’t clearly stated before—but even that one needs to follow logically from everything you have already discussed in the discussion section.

Discuss the implications

After summing up your key arguments or findings, conclude the paper by stating the broader implications of the research , whether in methods , approach, or findings. Express practical or theoretical takeaways from your paper. This often looks like a “call to action” or a final “sales pitch” that puts an exclamation point on your paper.

If your research topic is more theoretical in nature, your closing statement should express the significance of your argument—for example, in proposing a new understanding of a topic or laying the groundwork for future research.

Future research example

Future research into education standards should focus on establishing a more detailed picture of how novel pedagogical approaches impact young people’s ability to absorb new and difficult concepts. Moreover, observational studies are needed to gain more insight into how specific teaching models affect the retention of relationships and facts—for instance, how inquiry-based learning and its emphasis on lateral thinking can be used as a jumping-off point for more holistic classroom approaches.

Research Conclusion Example and Outline

Let’s revisit the study on the effect of stress on the brain we mentioned before and see what the common structure for a conclusion paragraph looks like, in three steps. Following these simple steps will make it easy for you to wrap everything up in one short paragraph that contains all the essential information: 

One: Short summary of what you did, but integrated into the summary of your findings:

While it has been known for a long time that stress has an effect on the brain, the findings of this fMRI study in 25 university students going through mid-term exams show that, surprisingly, one’s attitude to the experienced stress significantly modulates the brain’s response to it. 

Note that you don’t need to repeat any methodological or technical details here—the reader has been presented with all of these before, they have read your results section and the discussion of your results, and even (hopefully!) a discussion of the limitations and strengths of your paper. The only thing you need to remind them of here is the essential outcome of your work. 

Two: Add implications, and don’t forget to specify who this might be relevant for: 

Students could be considered a specific subsample of the general population, but earlier research shows that the effect that exam stress has on their physical and mental health is comparable to the effects of other types of stress on individuals of other ages and occupations. Further research into practical ways of modulating not only one’s mental stress response but potentially also one’s brain activity (e.g., via neurofeedback training) are warranted.

This is a “research implication”, and it is nicely combined with a mention of a potential limitation of the study (the student sample) that turns out not to be a limitation after all (because earlier research suggests we can generalize to other populations). If there already is a lot of research on neurofeedback for stress control, by the way, then this should have been discussed in your discussion section earlier and you wouldn’t say such studies are “warranted” here but rather specify how your findings could inspire specific future experiments or how they should be implemented in existing applications. 

Three: The most important thing is that your conclusion paragraph accurately reflects the content of your paper. Compare it to your research paper title , your research paper abstract , and to your journal submission cover letter , in case you already have one—if these do not all tell the same story, then you need to go back to your paper, start again from the introduction section, and find out where you lost the logical thread. As always, consistency is key.    

Problems to Avoid When Writing a Conclusion 

• Do not suddenly introduce new information that has never been mentioned before (unless you are writing an essay and opting for an externalizing conclusion, see above). The conclusion section is not where you want to surprise your readers, but the take-home message of what you have already presented.
• Do not simply copy your abstract, the conclusion section of your abstract, or the first sentence of your introduction, and put it at the end of the discussion section. Even if these parts of your paper cover the same points, they should not be identical.
• Do not start the conclusion with “In conclusion”. If it has its own section heading, that is redundant, and if it is the last paragraph of the discussion section, it is inelegant and also not really necessary. The reader expects you to wrap your work up in the last paragraph, so you don’t have to announce that. Just look at the above example to see how to start a conclusion in a natural way.
• Do not forget what your research objectives were and how you initially formulated the statement of the problem in your introduction section. If your story/approach/conclusions changed because of methodological issues or information you were not aware of when you started, then make sure you go back to the beginning and adapt your entire story (not just the ending). 

Consider Receiving Academic Editing Services

When you have arrived at the conclusion of your paper, you might want to head over to Wordvice AI’s AI Writing Assistant to receive a free grammar check for any academic content. 

After drafting, you can also receive English editing and proofreading services , including paper editing services for your journal manuscript. If you need advice on how to write the other parts of your research paper , or on how to make a research paper outline if you are struggling with putting everything you did together, then head over to the Wordvice academic resources pages , where we have a lot more articles and videos for you.

Explore Jobs

• Jobs Near Me
• Remote Jobs
• Full Time Jobs
• Part Time Jobs
• Entry Level Jobs
• Work From Home Jobs

Find Specific Jobs

• $15 Per Hour Jobs
• $20 Per Hour Jobs
• Hiring Immediately Jobs
• High School Jobs
• H1b Visa Jobs

Explore Careers

• Business And Financial
• Architecture And Engineering
• Computer And Mathematical

Explore Professions

• What They Do
• Certifications
• Demographics

Best Companies

• Health Care
• Fortune 500

Explore Companies

• CEO And Executies
• Resume Builder
• Career Advice
• Explore Majors
• Questions And Answers
• Interview Questions
• How To Write A Conclusion For A Research Paper
• What Are Skills Employers Look For?
• What Are Inductive Reasoning?
• What Are Problem Solving Skills?
• What Are Active Listening Skills?
• What Are Management Skills?
• What Are Attention To Detail?
• What Are Detail Oriented Skills?
• What Are Domain Knowledge?
• What Is Professionalism?
• What Are Rhetorical Skills?
• What Is Integrity?
• What Are Persuasion Skills?
• How To Start A Conversation
• Team Player
• Visual Learner
• High Income Skills
• The Most Important Professional Skills

Find a Job You Really Want In

Writing a research paper is tedious, and after all that work, you’d think the conclusion would be the easy part. In reality, this is often one of the most difficult sections of a research paper to write, since you have to neatly tie up pages and pages of research in a short amount of time.

To help you with this, we’ve put together some instructions and tips on how to write a research paper conclusion. We’ll also talk about what conclusions are, why they’re important, and different ways you can format them.

Key Takeaways

Research paper conclusions serve to close the argument the introduction opened and restate the main points of the research paper.

There are three research paper conclusion formats: summarization, reflective, and projective.

Your research paper conclusion should be concise, straightforward, and accurate.

How To Write A Research Paper Conclusion

6 tips for writing a research paper conclusion, different formats of research paper conclusions, what is the conclusion of a research paper, why is writing a conclusion important for a research paper, research paper conclusion faq.

• Sign Up For More Advice and Jobs

Many students understand that the conclusion is a crucial part of their research paper, but they don’t know how to go about writing one.

Follow the steps below for how to write a research paper conclusion.

Open With The Research Topic. To begin a conclusion paragraph, use the first sentence to reiterate the comprehensive subject matter that your paper covered. Since this is just a sentence-long retelling of your research topic and why it’s important, it doesn’t have to be specific, but it does need clarity.

Dragonflies are a magnificently complex insect whose advanced physical mechanics and vast species differences make them a notable study in the scientific community.

Focus On Your Specific Thesis. Every research paper focuses on targetted intricacies within a larger topic. Now that the more extensive topic of the research paper has been mentioned, the next sentence or two highlights the specific thesis presented.

Don’t merely copy and paste the introduction of your thesis from the first paragraph. Restate it in different words that illicit a more in-depth understanding from the reader .

The overall characteristics found only within the Odonata family unites the dragonfly under a singular title. All species of dragonfly faced the same path towards the modern structure known today, and therefore, they are all similar in one way or another. However, there are also significant differences apparent to the naked eye between a species that shares so much of the same structure.

Summarize And Connect Main Points. Throughout a research paper, the writer presents points to support the initial thesis claim. Very briefly summarize and tie together these points in a way that supports your thesis. This is the place to restate your research findings.

By examining the striped meadowhawk and migrant hawker dragonflies, it is shown that habitat governs many aspects pertaining to that specific species’ lifestyle. It is also proven that color and patterns perceived on this insect serve a greater purpose of individualizing and distinguishing between these two species.

Bring It All Together. It sounds redundant to say you need to conclude your conclusion, but that’s the final step. You’ve done the mini recap of your research paper through the beginning sentences of your essay. Close the conclusion by making a final encouragement for an action, idea, or fact.

The dragonfly is a unique insect with uniting factors and specialization. However, the most attributed aspect to this insect as a whole is the enormity of their differences. The evolved genetic features attributed to various species of dragonflies both individualize them and apply unification to the insect as a whole.

Consider What Conclusion Format To Use Carefully. The way you structure a conclusion has a massive effect on how impactful it will be to a reader.

Some types of writing can work well with a variety of conclusion formats, but others will confuse a paper’s message. For example, using a reflective style conclusion on a scientific research paper comes across as too opinion-based for a topic that’s shrouded in measurable fact.

Don’t Make It Too Complex. It’s best to use plain language when summarizing the information presented in a research paper or making a claim. Many students are tempted to use impressive wording and complex writing in a research paper conclusion to present themselves as experts in the subject , but it only gives the reader a headache.

Conclusions Should Be Concise . Research papers give the writer pages of leeway to make all the drawn-out points that they need, but conclusions don’t offer as much room. An essay’s conclusion needs to be short by definition because it’s merely a last takeaway for the reader. A research paper conclusion is a final paragraph, not the entire page .

Double Check Your Information. There’s nothing worse for a research paper’s validity than confidently making a claim in the conclusion that turns out to be false. It’s fundamental that all the facts and information your detail in a research paper are backed up with credible sources listed neatly on the works cited page.

Empathize With The Reader. Whether you’re submitting a research paper for an introductory university class or publishing a scholarly journal, you still need to keep the reader in mind when writing a conclusion. Think about who you’re communicating with through your research paper and what you’re hoping to accomplish with it.

Do Research . One way to fix the problem if you’re unsure of what makes an essay conclusion compelling is researching the topic. Reading articles (like this one) is helpful because they give you a clear demonstration of how to create a conclusion, but applying this structure to your own work can be difficult. A case of easier said than done.

Based on the goal or subject of your research paper, the structure of your conclusion changes. Pick a type of conclusion that will strengthen the point of your essay. Below are examples of different formats to use when writing research paper conclusions.

Summarization. The summarization conclusion is most commonly used for research papers that are presenting a series of concrete facts.

It’s the form of conclusion that most people are familiar with. Using the summary technique requires a succinct compiling of the most critical points you’ve made in an essay.

Summarization Conclusion Formatting Works Best For:

Solution-Based Research

Persuasive Writing

History and Science Studies

Structuring An Argument

Reflective. A conclusion that uses a reflective structure takes the information outlined in the research paper to arrive at a grander insight about the topic at hand. This type of conclusion is popular when you’re attempting to change the reader’s viewpoint with a paper.

Reflective Conclusion Formatting Works Best For:

Persuasive Essays

English and Political Studies

Projective. When using a projective conclusion, the writer applies their work presented earlier in the thesis to eventual outcomes that can arise. It is called a projective conclusion because it is more results-based than summarizing facts or establishing an overarching lesson.

Projective Conclusion Formatting Works Best For:

Research Paper

Expository Essay

Narrative Works (Sometimes)

The conclusion of a research paper ties together all the prior information you’ve covered. It leaves the reader with a final thought about the research paper and the message it’s trying to convey.

Unlike the body paragraphs of a research paper, which aim at specificity and focus on developing a single concept or piece of information, conclusions are broader. The goal is to gloss over what’s already been stated earlier in the essay to solidify it with the reader.

The conclusion also serves a different purpose than the introduction . An introductory paragraph is for establishing what the reader will be learning more about. It opens the metaphorical door towards understanding a research endeavor or topic. The conclusion closes the argument that the introductory paragraph opens.

Including a conclusion is an important part of writing a research paper because it creates an organized summarization of information and outlines inferences about the subject studied. It provides an additional layer of clarity in a short written work.

Research papers are often lengthy and dull, so it’s easy for a reader’s attention to stray. A conclusion brings the reader back and offers them the most critical takeaways from the paper.

How long should a good conclusion be?

A good conclusion should be one paragraph or three to five sentences long. Your research paper conclusion should be concise, which means you don’t need to take up a whole page for just your conclusion. Instead, try to stick to about one paragraph in length.

What are the general rules in crafting conclusions in your research paper?

The general rules for crafting conclusions for your research paper include:

Choose the right conclusion format.

Keep it simple.

Be concise.

Be accurate.

Keep the reader’s needs (or requirements) in mind.

Remind the reader of your thesis.

Summarize and connect main points.

End with a concluding sentence.

What is a better way to say, “In conclusion”?

A better way to say, “In conclusion,” is “Therefore,” “Finally,” or “Lastly.” Other good words include, “As expressed” or “As a result.” You can also simply launch into your concluding paragraph if a transition isn’t needed.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Sky Ariella is a professional freelance writer, originally from New York. She has been featured on websites and online magazines covering topics in career, travel, and lifestyle. She received her BA in psychology from Hunter College.

Recent Job Searches

• Registered Nurse Jobs Resume Location
• Truck Driver Jobs Resume Location
• Call Center Representative Jobs Resume Location
• Customer Service Representative Jobs Resume
• Delivery Driver Jobs Resume Location
• Warehouse Worker Jobs Resume Location
• Account Executive Jobs Resume Location
• Sales Associate Jobs Resume Location
• Licensed Practical Nurse Jobs Resume Location
• Company Driver Jobs Resume

Related posts

Jobs That Use Adwords The Most

Top 8 Skills Employers Look For In Job Candidates (With Examples)

What Are Problem-Solving Skills? (Definition, Examples, And How To List On A Resume)

50 Jobs That Use Powerpoint The Most

• Career Advice >
• Desired Traits >

How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper: Examples & Tips

You might be wondering about how to write a conclusion paragraph for a research paper. It may seem like your readers should understand your main arguments by the end, so there is no need for it. However, there are several aspects that prove the importance of a conclusion section in research.

Its first and primary function is, of course, a summary of all the main ideas and evidence in the paper. Sometimes research can be quite lengthy so putting all the thoughts you want to share in one place is very handy. Moreover, the conclusion shows how important your work is and suggests new ways of looking at the problem.

Our guide and research paper conclusion example are here to help you with your assignment!

• ❗ Importance of a Conclusion
• 👣 Writing Steps
• 📑 Conclusion Types & Examples
• ❌ Common Mistakes

🔗 References

❗ importance of a conclusion in a research paper.

A conclusion intends to remind the readers about the main arguments and findings of the whole paper. However, it also highlights the significance of the work. Both these functions help create a long-lasting, memorable impression from your research paper , so always include this part and try to think of the ways to make it even more effective.

Since having a strong concluding paragraph is so crucial for the overall success, you might want to check out a step-by-step guide on writing it. It can assure you don’t miss any vital moments. Moreover, you need to find out what conclusion type would be the best!

👣 How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper Step by Step

Below are only a few simple steps that can allow you to write the most persuasive research paper.

📑 Types & Examples of Research Paper Conclusions

You may be assigned to write a persuasive or argumentative paper. Or your professor might ask you to develop an analytical or comparative research paper.

Should you write their conclusions in the same way? The answer is “No”. When you write different types of assignments, you need different conclusions.

Argumentative Research Paper Conclusion

To write an excellent argumentative paper conclusion, you need to highlight the most persuasive and strong arguments you have — no need to add many details. In addition, don’t forget you should include the essential components of the conclusion, such as paraphrasing your thesis statement, which points out your opinion on the chosen topic. If you used a strong thesis statement generator , it won’t be hard to do.

Argumentative Research Paper Conclusion Example

Right now, Earth is facing the issue of the sixth extinction, which causes numerous species to fade every day. There are at least three ideas people might use to prevent their total extinction in the next fifty years. More ways of recycling, new approaches to plastic production, and conservation of species could be life-saving.

Analytical Research Paper Conclusion

First, you should restate your thesis statement and summarize the critical points of your arguments. The main difference between the analytical research paper conclusion and other types is that there should definitely be a highlight of a broader context. It means you can add some meaning to the findings.

Analytical Research Paper Conclusion Example

Elon Musk has made a revolution in the way we pay, drive, and even fly. His ideas come only from the desire to make things easier, but eventually, they change the world. Musk first thought about PayPal when he was a student, and now it’s one of the most popular online payment systems. The same with Tesla cars.

Comparative Research Paper Conclusion

An effective comparative paper conclusion requires some analytical skills. You need to be very careful in looking through facts to clearly formulate your findings. Moreover, the sources need to be trustworthy. And, as usual, you need to add a paraphrased thesis statement and a few words about the importance of your study research.

Comparative Research Paper Conclusion Example

Electric cars are proven to be more efficient and effective than gas cars. Not only do they produce fewer emissions, but the drivers reach their destination point faster. Moreover, gas cars are more expensive to maintain. It all derives from the specifics of the electric cars’ engines, which are much simpler.

❌ Common Mistakes You Should Avoid

Are you ready to pass your writing? Wait! Have you checked it for the most common mistakes? If no, below are several general errors you should avoid.

• The Conclusion – Organizing Academic Research Papers
• Conclusions – UNC Writing Center
• Conclusions // Purdue Writing Lab
• Writing the conclusion – Research & Learning Online
• Writing a Research Paper – The Writing Center – UW–Madison
• How to Structure & Organize Your Paper
• Writing Conclusions: Writing Guides
• Ending the Essay: Conclusions
• Tips for Writing Policy Papers – Stanford Law School
• A Process Approach to Writing Research Papers
• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to LinkedIn
• Share to email

American Antiquity is a professional quarterly journal, which contains various papers on the American archeology. It is incredibly popular among archeologists and the students majoring in history. The organization adopted the rules of The Society for American Archaeology (SAA) citation style. As a result: The journal includes numerous references that...

The most tedious and time-consuming part of any school or college written assignment is the bibliography. Sometimes, it can even be challenging! For example, if you’re confused by the variety of citation styles. That is why Custom-Writing experts prepared a brief guide about creating a perfect bibliography for a project....

An appendix is the part of the paper that contains supplementary material. The information from an appendix in paper writing is not essential. If the readers ignore this part, they still have to get the paper’s idea. Appendices help the readers to understand the research better. They might be useful...

Writing an abstract is one of the skills you need to master to succeed in your studies. An abstract is a summary of an academic text. It contains information about the aims and the outcomes of the research. The primary purpose of an abstract is to help readers understand what...

So you have to write a literature review. You find your favorite novel and then start analyzing it. This is how it’s usually done, right? It’s not. You have to learn the elements of literature review and how to deal with them.

Looking for relevant sources of information for your research is already a tiring process, but when you also need to pay attention to their credibility, it becomes almost impossible! However, it’s still a quite critical aspect to pay attention to. Using unreliable sites like Wikipedia, even if it’s a two-page...

A research proposal is a text that suggests a topic or research problem, justifies the need to study it, and describes the ways and methods of conducting the study. Scholars usually write proposals to get funding for their research. In their turn, students might have to do that to get...

It’s longer than your Bachelor’s thesis. It’s more stressful. It’s more important. And you have no clue how to write it. We understand that a lot comes with the responsibility of creating a Master’s thesis from scratch. But no need to stress out; you can get all the help you...

Students struggle with academic writing rules. Mastering them takes longer than writing the paper. But when the conventions become a normal state of things, the process becomes faster and easier than before. The less you think about the form, the more time you have to think about the contents.

Few students fully get the meaning and the importance of a research proposal. If you have a good research proposal, it means that you are going to carry out adequate research. A low-quality research proposal may be the reason your research will never start.

A lab report is quite a serious piece of paper that has a massive value in your research. And don’t be deceived by the name as the lab report is not a form you just need to fill in. There is an impressive list of components you need to describe...

A literature review is an update on the status of current research related to the issue in question. Its purpose is to provide the reader with a guide to a particular research topic. And for the writer, a well-written literature review is the best way to show their competence in...

Very, very useful website for students. I appreciate people who kindly share brilliant writing tips with others! Thanks a lot!

Great article! It helped me to complete my research papers conclusion that was a real nightmare for me! Thank you so much for it!

I was on my way to completing my research paper and going to finish the conclusion by copy-pasting the introduction. Thank God, I wanted to read some articles on conclusion writing. After reading your post on this question, I completed my conclusion following your instructions. Believe my research paper is worth an excellent mark!

In response to a comment from Lynn: Thank you for noting this unfortunate mistake in the text. Obviously, we spend a lot of time compiling, writing, and editing materials, but there’s always room for a simple human error! Thanks again, and have a great day! 🙂

This helped a lot, thanks =)

This helped me so much! Thank you!

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Conclusions

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

Conclusions wrap up what you have been discussing in your paper. After moving from general to specific information in the introduction and body paragraphs, your conclusion should begin pulling back into more general information that restates the main points of your argument. Conclusions may also call for action or overview future possible research. The following outline may help you conclude your paper:

In a general way,

• Restate your topic and why it is important,
• Restate your thesis/claim,
• Address opposing viewpoints and explain why readers should align with your position,
• Call for action or overview future research possibilities.

Remember that once you accomplish these tasks, unless otherwise directed by your instructor, you are finished. Done. Complete. Don't try to bring in new points or end with a whiz bang(!) conclusion or try to solve world hunger in the final sentence of your conclusion. Simplicity is best for a clear, convincing message.

The preacher's maxim is one of the most effective formulas to follow for argument papers:

Tell what you're going to tell them (introduction).

Tell them (body).

Tell them what you told them (conclusion).

The impact of environmental regulation and economic expectations on crop-livestock integration among hog farmers: a field study from China

• Research Article
• Published: 01 June 2024

Cite this article

• Jing Cao 1 ,
• Jiapeng Xu 1 ,
• Huimin Cao 1 ,
• Fangfang Wang 1 ,
• Zhenyu Yan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-9763 1 &
• Taimoor Muhammad 1  

Decoupling of crop-livestock systems increases the risks of pollution, waste of nutrient resources, and biodiversity loss. Crop-livestock integration (CLI) is an effective solution to these problems, and motivating farmers to adopt CLI is the key. Many countries have implemented environmental regulations (ER) aiming to influence farmers’ CLI adoption decisions. Based on a field study of 316 hog farmers from Shaanxi Province of China, this paper applies the triple-hurdle model to empirically examine the impacts of economic expectations (EE) and ER on CLI adoption decisions. It also verifies the income effect of CLI. The results are as follows: 90.5% of farmers are willing to adopt CLI, but the adoption rate is only 40.8% and the average integration degree is only 0.236; CLI not been widely popularized. EE and ER promote farmers’ CLI adoption significantly, while the impact of interaction between EE and ER on CLI adoption differs. IER weakens the positive impact of EE on farmers’ CLI integration degree, which has a “crowding out effect.” GER negatively moderates the impact of EE on farmers’ adoption willingness of CLI. CER strengthens the positive effect of EE on farmers’ adoption behavior and CLI integration degree. CLI increases the farmers’ income. These results contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of CLI adoption decisions and sustainable policy optimization for green agricultural development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper.

When testing for sample selection errors, IMR was not significant. Therefore, only the test results of IMR are explained here, and the overall regression results are not reported (Models 1–8).

Asai M, Moraine M, Ryschawy J et al (2018) Critical factors for crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level: a cross-analysis of worldwide case studies. Land Use Policy 73:184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.010

Article   Google Scholar  

Bai Z, Ma L, Jin S et al (2016) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium flows through the manure management chain in China. Environ Sci Technol 50:13409–13418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03348

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Bai Z, Ma W, Ma L et al (2018) China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Sci Adv 4:eaar8534. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8534

Bai Z, Fan X, Jin X et al (2022) Relocate 10 billion livestock to reduce harmful nitrogen pollution exposure for 90% of China’s population. Nat Food 3:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00453-z

Bao W, Wu Y, Bao H (2024) Transaction costs, crop-livestock integration participation, and income effects in China. Front Sustain Food Syst 7:1247770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1247770

Barnes AP, Willock J, Hall C, Toma L (2009) Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programmes in Scotland. Agric Water Manag 96:1715–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.002

Belay DG, Jensen JD (2020) ‘The scarlet letters’: information disclosure and self-regulation: evidence from antibiotic use in Denmark. J Environ Econ Manag 104:102385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102385

Bell LW, Moore AD (2012) Integrated crop–livestock systems in Australian agriculture: trends, drivers and implications. Agric Syst 111:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.04.003

Branca G, Perelli C (2020) ‘Clearing the air’: common drivers of climate-smart smallholder food production in Eastern and Southern Africa. J Clean Prod 270:121900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121900

Burke WJ, Myers RJ, Jayne TS (2015) A triple-hurdle model of production and market participation in Kenya’s dairy market. Am J Agric Econ 97:1227–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav009

Cao D, Li H, Wang G, Huang T (2017) Identifying and contextualising the motivations for BIM implementation in construction projects: an empirical study in China. Int J Proj Manag 35:658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.002

Carrer MJ, Maia AG, de Mello BrandãoVinholis M, de Souza Filho HM (2020) Assessing the effectiveness of rural credit policy on the adoption of integrated crop-livestock systems in Brazil. Land Use Policy 92:104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104468

Chen Q, Xu Q, Yu X (2023) Triple-hurdle model analysis of aquaculture farmers’ multi-stage willingness to participate in green and healthy aquaculture actions in China: based on ecological cognition and environmental regulation perspectives. Front Sustain Food Syst 7:1211392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1211392

Cheng P, Li J, Zhang H, Cheng G (2023) Sustainable management behavior of farmland shelterbelt of farmers in ecologically fragile areas: empirical evidence from Xinjiang, China. Sustainability 15:2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032011

Cortner O, Garrett RD, Valentim JF et al (2019) Perceptions of integrated crop-livestock systems for sustainable intensification in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 82:841–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.006

Cui G, Liu Z (2022) The impact of environmental regulations and social norms on farmers’ chemical fertilizer reduction behaviors: an investigation of citrus farmers in southern China. Sustainability 14:8157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138157

de Groot JIM, Steg L (2009) Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conserv Lett 2:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00048.x

Dessart FJ, Barreiro-Hurlé J, Van Bavel R (2019) Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. Eur Rev Agric Econ 46:417–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019

Dos Reis JC, Kamoi MYT, Latorraca D et al (2020) Assessing the economic viability of integrated crop−livestock systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Renew Agric Food Syst 35:631–642. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170519000280

dos Reis JC, Rodrigues GS, de Barros I et al (2021) Integrated crop-livestock systems: a sustainable land-use alternative for food production in the Brazilian Cerrado and Amazon. J Clean Prod 283:124580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124580

Du S, Liu J, Fu Z (2021a) The impact of village rules and formal environmental regulations on farmers’ cleaner production behavior: new evidence from China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:7311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147311

Du S, Luo X, Huang Y et al (2021b) Risk perception, specialized agricultural services and rice farmers’ adoption behavior of biological pesticide technology. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 30:1768–1779

Google Scholar  

Finger R, Lehmann N (2012) Policy reforms to promote efficient and sustainable water use in Swiss agriculture. Water Policy 14:887–901. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2012.152

Garrett R, Niles M, Gil J et al (2017) Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis. Sustainability 9:473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030473

Garrett R, Ryschawy J, Bell L et al (2020) Drivers of decoupling and recoupling of crop and livestock systems at farm and territorial scales. Ecol Soc 25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11412-250124

Gil JDB, Garrett R, Berger T (2016) Determinants of crop-livestock integration in Brazil: evidence from the household and regional levels. Land Use Policy 59:557–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.022

Gil JDB, Garrett RD, Rotz A et al (2018) Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso. Brazil Environ Res Lett 13:064025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4d1

Goodhue RE, Mohapatra S, Rausser GC (2010) Interactions between incentive instruments: contracts and quality in processing tomatoes. Am J Agric Econ 92:1283–1293. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq061

Gu B (2022) Recoupling livestock and crops. Nat Food 3:102–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00466-2

Guo Q, Li H, Li S, Nan L (2021) Research on farmers’ pro-environmental behavior from the perspective of paradox existing between behavior and willingness: taking the organic fertilizers application as an example. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 30:212–224

Guo Z, Chen X, Zhang Y (2022) Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers’ agricultural green production technology adoption: a new perspective of social capital. Technol Soc 71:102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102085

Guo Q (2021) The fading relationship between agriculture and animal husbandry and its reconstruction. Chin Rural Econ 22–35. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1262.F.20211011.0858.004.html

Hamazakaza P, Kabwe G, Kuntashula E et al (2022) Adoption of sustainable agriculture intensification in maize-based farming systems of Katete District in Zambia. Land 11:880. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060880

Han Z, Han C, Shi Z et al (2023) Rebuilding the crop-livestock integration system in China ——based on the perspective of circular economy. J Clean Prod 393:136347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136347

Harper JK, Roth GW, Garalejić B, Škrbić N (2018) Programs to promote adoption of conservation tillage: a Serbian case study. Land Use Policy 78:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.028

Ji C, Jin S, Wang H, Ye C (2019) Estimating effects of cooperative membership on farmers’ safe production behaviors: evidence from pig sector in China. Food Policy 83:231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.007

Jin S, Zhang B, Wu B et al (2020) Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China. Nat Sustain 4:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00596-0

Kaczan DJ, Swallow BM, Adamowicz WL (Vic) (2019) Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: experimental evidence from Tanzania. Ecol Econ 156:444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.002

Kelifa A (2023) Review of Tobit, Heckman and double hurdle econometric models: supported with evidences from the studies conducted in Ethiopia. SN Bus Econ 3:104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00478-5

Khed VD, Krishna VV (2023) Agency and time poverty: linking decision-making powers and leisure time of male and female farmers of Central India. World Dev Perspect 29:100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100484

Knight J, Deng Q, Li S (2011) The puzzle of migrant labour shortage and rural labour surplus in China, China. Econ Rev 22:585–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2011.01.006

Li Y, Wang B (2022) Environmental motivation or economic motivation? Explaining individuals’ intention to carry reusable bags for shopping in China. Front Psychol 13:972748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972748

Li F, Ren J, Wimmer S et al (2020) Incentive mechanism for promoting farmers to plant green manure in China. J Clean Prod 267:122197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122197

Li Y, Sun Z, Accatino F et al (2021) Comparing specialised crop and integrated crop-livestock systems in China with a multi-criteria approach using the emergy method. J Clean Prod 314:127974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127974

Liu Z, Sun J, Zhu W, Qu Y (2021) Exploring impacts of perceived value and government regulation on farmers’ willingness to adopt wheat straw incorporation in China. Land 10:1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10101051

Lu Y, Tan Y, Wang H (2022) Impact of environmental regulation on green technology adoption by farmers microscopic investigation evidence from pig breeding in China. Front Environ Sci 10:885933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.885933

Ma W, Abdulai A (2016) Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from apple farmers in China. Food Policy 58:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.002

Ma L, Bai Z, Ma W et al (2019) Exploring future food provision scenarios for China. Environ Sci Technol 53:1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04375

Martin G, Moraine M, Ryschawy J et al (2016) Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x

Mather DL, Jayne TS (2018) Fertilizer subsidies and the role of targeting in crowding out: evidence from Kenya. Food Secur 10:397–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0773-8

Meraner M, Finger R (2019) Risk perceptions, preferences and management strategies: evidence from a case study using German livestock farmers. J Risk Res 22:110–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351476

Midler E, Pascual U, Drucker AG et al (2015) Unraveling the effects of payments for ecosystem services on motivations for collective action. Ecol Econ 120:394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.006

Missiame A, Nyikal RA, Irungu P (2021) What is the impact of rural bank credit access on the technical efficiency of smallholder cassava farmers in Ghana? An endogenous switching regression analysis. Heliyon 7:e07102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07102

Moraine M, Duru M, Nicholas P et al (2014) Farming system design for innovative crop-livestock integration in Europe. Anim Int J Anim Biosci 8:1204–1217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001189

Niles MT, Garrett RD, Walsh D (2017) Ecological and economic benefits of integrating sheep into viticulture production. Agron Sustain Dev 38:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0478-y

Pelletier LG, Tuson KM, Haddad NK (1997) Client motivation for therapy scale: a measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. J Pers Assess 68:414–435. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_11

Peterson CA, Deiss L, Gaudin ACM (2020) Commercial integrated crop-livestock systems achieve comparable crop yields to specialized production systems: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 15:e0231840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231840

Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P (2012) Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J Clean Prod 24:184–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030

Prokopy LS, Floress K, Arbuckle JG et al (2019) Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. J Soil Water Conserv 74:520–534. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520

Regan JT, Marton S, Barrantes O et al (2017) Does the recoupling of dairy and crop production via cooperation between farms generate environmental benefits? A case-study approach in Europe. Eur J Agron 82:342–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.005

Ryschawy J, Grillot M, Charmeau A et al (2022) A participatory approach based on the serious game Dynamix to co-design scenarios of crop-livestock integration among farms. Agric Syst 201:103414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103414

Schut AGT, Cooledge EC, Moraine M et al (2021) Reintegration of crop-livestock systems in Europe: an overview. Front Agric Sci Eng 8:111. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020373

Shi H, Sui D, Wu H, Zhao M (2018a) The influence of social capital on farmers’ participation in watershed ecological management behavior: evidence from Heihe Basin. Chin Rural Econ 34–45. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1262.F.20180201.1801.008.html

Shi Y, Yao L, Zhao M (2018b) The effect of social capital on herds men’s participation willingness in grassland community governance: an analysis based on triple-hurdle model. China Rural Surv 35–50. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3586.F.20180507.1530.006.html

Shi ZH, Zhang H (2021) Research on social norms, environmental regulations and farmers’ choice of fertilization behavior. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan 42:51–61. https://doi.org/10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20211107

Skaalsveen K, Ingram J, Urquhart J (2020) The role of farmers’ social networks in the implementation of no-till farming practices. Agric Syst 181:102824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102824

Sneessens I, Veysset P, Benoit M et al (2016) Direct and indirect impacts of crop–livestock organization on mixed crop–livestock systems sustainability: a model-based study. Animal 10:1911–1922. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116000720

Tan K, Cai G, Du Z et al (2023) Emergy synthesis of decoupling and recoupling crop-livestock systems under unified system boundary and modified indices. Sci Total Environ 877:162880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162880

Trujillo-Barrera A, Pennings JME, Hofenk D (2016) Understanding producers’ motives for adopting sustainable practices: the role of expected rewards, risk perception and risk tolerance. Eur Rev Agric Econ 43:359–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv038

Wang X, Tan S (2020) Cost-efficiency analysis of rice-crayfish integrated land operation mode based on non-homogeneous DEA. China Land Sci 34:56–63. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20191225.105326

Wang TX, Teng CG, Zhang ZH (2020) Informal social support, environmental regulation and farmers’ film recycling behavior. J Arid Land Resour Environ 34:109–115. https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.218

Wang L, Song B, Wu J, Wang L (2022) An empirical study on the influence of environmental regulation and farmers’ cognition on the application behavior of organic fertilizer: based on the survey data of 741 farmers in YE county, PINGDINGSHAN city, Henan province. J Henan Univ Technol Soc Sci 38:57–67. https://doi.org/10.16433/j.cnki.cn41-1379.2022.03.014

Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B et al (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393:447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4

Yang C, Liang X, Xue Y et al (2024) Can government regulation weak the gap between green production intention and behavior? Based on the perspective of farmers’ perceptions. J Clean Prod 434:139743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139743

Yang X, Qi Z (2022) The impact of expected return and technology subsidy on farmers’ adoption of agroecological technology: taking rice–crayfish co–culture technology as an example. J Huazhong Agric Univ Sci Ed 89–100. https://doi.org/10.13300/j.cnki.hnwkxb.2022.05.010

Zhang J, Chen M, Huang C, Lai Z (2022) Labor endowment, cultivated land fragmentation, and ecological farming adoption strategies among farmers in Jiangxi Province, China. Land 11:679. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050679

Zhao J, Liu L, Qi J, Dong J (2022) Study on the influence of environmental regulation on the environmentally friendly behavior of farmers in China. Front Environ Sci 10:1009151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1009151

Zhao Y, Liu L, Zhao J (2023) Perceived benefits, environmental regulation and farmers ’ waste recycling behavior-taking duck farmers as an example. World Agric 98–110. https://doi.org/10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2023.04.009

Zhu X, Cai J (2016) The influences of perceived values and capability approach on farmers willingness to exit rural residential land and its intergenerational difference. China Land Sci 30:64–72. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20161024.124548

Download references

This work was supported by Key Think Tank Research Project of Shaanxi Province on “Social Sciences Helping County Economies Develop in High Quality” (2023ZD0662); Humanities and Social Sciences Project of Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in 2023 (452023307); Soft Science Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2022KRM032; 2023-CX-RKX-103); and Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2021D058; 2022D022). The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and corrections on the earlier draft of our paper.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China

Jing Cao, Jiapeng Xu, Huimin Cao, Fangfang Wang, Zhenyu Yan & Taimoor Muhammad

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Jing Cao: methodology; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing.

Jiapeng Xu: conceptualization, supervision, project administration, article modification.

Huimin Cao: data, research methods.

Fangfang Wang: data, research methods.

Zhenyu Yan: conceptualization, supervision, project administration, article modification.

Taimoor Muhammad: data, research methods.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenyu Yan .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval.

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Baojing Gu

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cao, J., Xu, J., Cao, H. et al. The impact of environmental regulation and economic expectations on crop-livestock integration among hog farmers: a field study from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33616-z

Download citation

Received : 03 January 2024

Accepted : 05 May 2024

Published : 01 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33616-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Crop-livestock integration
• Economic expectations
• Environmental regulation
• Triple-hurdle model
• Pig farmers
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Dental Anesthesia and Unsafe Practices Research Paper

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

In the healthcare industry, the application of syringes is a primary characterization requiring caution by professionals. Particularly, needles are used in administering intravenous anesthesia to patients in dental care. According to Anand (2020), it is a primary rule that safe injection ensures avoidable risks are averted to protect the recipients. Despite such safety rules, health workers may exercise unsafe practices with risks in administering anesthesia and providing care. These risks justify the necessity to reflect on the unsafe practices while using syringes. The Dental Anesthesia class displayed how the practitioner’s actions and perspectives can lead to unwanted impacts. For instance, I made two unsafe practice errors, including incorrect harpoon engagement when setting up a syringe and inappropriate needle placement, which could be fatal to both the clinician and the patient. Therefore, in this reflection, I will expound on the research, self-reflection, and prevention measures that I would have taken to avoid these errors in the future.

Incorrect Harpoon Engagement when Setting Up Syringes and Inappropriate Needle Placement

In dental anesthesia, the unsafe practice may involve incorrect engagement of harpoons while setting up syringes. Logothetis (2021) purported that the unsafe practice is attributed to the increased risk of disengaging harpoons that undermine patient care. When a harpoon disengages, it affects the ability to aspirate, which is necessary during anesthetic administration. Appropriate medical practice prescribes that when aspiration cannot be accomplished, the practitioner must remove the needle, re-engage the harpoon and start over (Logothetis, 2021). Thus, the incorrect engagement of a needle affects patient care and makes service delivery difficult.

Inappropriate needle placement is another unsafe practice that affects the procedures of administering care to patients. The unsafe perspective in the dental anesthesia class included the challenge of a needle not screwed in properly. The risk is aligned with the risk to the patient and the practitioner from needle stick injuries. Research by Sriram (2019) stated that cases of exposure to blood fluids in the USA are a common challenge, flagged by the CDC that annually, over three million health workers are affected. The challenges involved are the potential exposure to bloodborne diseases from patients. Thus, the class effectively revealed the potential practices that increase the risk to the patient and the practitioner.

Self-Reflection

I realized that the lack of attention could be a potential flaw in practice that can influence unsafe practices. In the class, students were prone to mistakes due to a lack of attention or sensitivity to details and secure mechanisms during the procedures. In my experience, I twisted the harpoon too hard while setting up the syringe, which was required to be a 1/2 turn while engaging a harpoon. I learned that slight alterations or small mistakes are detrimental to the procedure, with the risks of redoing the entire procedure. Moreover, in the second instance, due to incorrect screwing of the needle, the needle would come off the syringe easily. In this case, the chances of unwanted needle stick injury were high, creating an awareness of the fatal consequences that unsafe practices expose the patient and the practitioner. Appreciating the need to double-check equipment was reinforced through the exercises, highlighting that the issues are preventable and avoidable.

The unsafe practices in the dental anesthesia class were enlightening on the potential risks involved when using syringes. The practitioner can take measures during and before medical procedures to avert these risks caused by incorrect harpoon engagement when setting up syringes and incorrect needle placement on the syringe. Alsabaani et al. (2022) postulated that among the preventative measures of such risks is creating awareness and educating workers on the risks they exposed themselves and their patients to due to their actions. The approach can influence increased caution during procedures that allow healthcare workers to prioritize effective mechanisms of handling tools such as syringes and needles. An appropriate course of action requires following steps that are set in place to ensure effective practice. Logothetis (2021) prescribed that harpoon engagement requires the practitioner to have protective gear that reduces risks of injury. The approach enhances the safety of the patient and practitioners throughout the process.

On the other hand, the risks of incorrect engagement can be considered relative to the procedure’s efficiency. Furthermore, it is essential that the practitioner is gentle while engaging syringes into the rubber stoppers being careful not to exert excessive pressure. The measure reduces the risks of fracturing the cartridge, highlighted as a risk of unsafe practice. Moreover, Logothetis (2021) documented that securing syringes in a harpoon is more difficult when needles are already placed. The inference would thus require needle placement after engaging the syringe to the rubber stopper. Thus, the practitioner is responsible for weighing their actions to avert the risks of incorrect practice.

The research reveals that practitioners have a duty to exercise appropriate measures to reduce risks to healthcare. I realized that as a practitioner, individualized actions have consequences that may spiral into harming patients. Moreover, the damage to tools and the necessitated redoing of several procedures present a limitation of practice that are not cost-efficient in terms of equipment and time. The accruing issues arising from unsafe practices undermine the healthcare systems, worsening preventable or avoidable situations. Ultimately, the class was insightful with future implications in practice, influencing change in my perception of the field environment. The class was an essential component to reinforce ethical practice and effective care mechanisms to preserve the safety and well-being of the community that is central to any professional in the healthcare system.

Alsabaani, A., Alqahtani, N. S. S., Alqahtani, S. S. S., Al-Lugbi, J. H. J., Asiri, M. A. S., Salem, S. E. E., Alasmari, A. A., Mahmood, S. E., & Alalyani, M. (2022). Incidence, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Toward Needle Stick Injury Among Health Care Workers in Abha City, Saudi Arabia . Frontiers in Public Health , 10 . Web.

Anand, V., Rai, R., Bettie, N. F., & Priya, S. (2020). A study on the Aspiration Procedures in Syringes among Health Care Professionals . Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology , 14 (4). Web.

Logothetis, D. D. (2021). Local Anesthesia For The Dental Hygienist . (3rd ed.). Elvisier Health Sciences. Web.

Sriram, S. (2019). Study of needle stick injuries among healthcare providers: Evidence from a teaching hospital in India . Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care , 8 (2), 599. Web.

• Description of Topical Anesthesia
• 6 Local Anesthetics in Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia
• When to Standard Precautions Over Sterile Precautions While Taking Care of Patients
• Burnout Among Dental Hygienists in California
• Dental Professionals and Current Issues in Dentistry
• Guided Biofilm Therapy in Dental Hygiene
• Alternative Dental Hygienist Career
• Dental Hygienist Career and Job Setting
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, June 1). Dental Anesthesia and Unsafe Practices. https://ivypanda.com/essays/dental-anesthesia-and-unsafe-practices/

"Dental Anesthesia and Unsafe Practices." IvyPanda , 1 June 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/dental-anesthesia-and-unsafe-practices/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'Dental Anesthesia and Unsafe Practices'. 1 June.

IvyPanda . 2024. "Dental Anesthesia and Unsafe Practices." June 1, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/dental-anesthesia-and-unsafe-practices/.

1. IvyPanda . "Dental Anesthesia and Unsafe Practices." June 1, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/dental-anesthesia-and-unsafe-practices/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Dental Anesthesia and Unsafe Practices." June 1, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/dental-anesthesia-and-unsafe-practices/.

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Published on 31.5.2024 in Vol 26 (2024)

Evaluation and Comparison of Academic Impact and Disruptive Innovation Level of Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis and Disruptive Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Original Paper

• Yuyan Jiang 1 , MPhil   ; 
• Xue-li Liu 1, 2 , BM   ; 
• Zixuan Zhang 1 , MPhil   ; 
• Xinru Yang 1 , MPhil  

1 Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China

2 Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China

Corresponding Author:

Xue-li Liu, BM

Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences

Xinxiang Medical University

Library and Information Building, 2nd Fl.

No. 601, Jinsui Avenue, Hongqi District

Xinxiang, 450003

Phone: 86 1 383 736 0965

Email: [email protected]

Background: As an important platform for researchers to present their academic findings, medical journals have a close relationship between their evaluation orientation and the value orientation of their published research results. However, the differences between the academic impact and level of disruptive innovation of medical journals have not been examined by any study yet.

Objective: This study aims to compare the relationships and differences between the academic impact, disruptive innovation levels, and peer review results of medical journals and published research papers. We also analyzed the similarities and differences in the impact evaluations, disruptive innovations, and peer reviews for different types of medical research papers and the underlying reasons.

Methods: The general and internal medicine Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) journals in 2018 were chosen as the study object to explore the differences in the academic impact and level of disruptive innovation of medical journals based on the OpenCitations Index of PubMed open PMID-to-PMID citations (POCI) and H1Connect databases, respectively, and we compared them with the results of peer review.

Results: First, the correlation coefficients of the Journal Disruption Index (JDI) with the Journal Cumulative Citation for 5 years (JCC 5 ), Journal Impact Factor (JIF), and Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) were 0.677, 0.585, and 0.621, respectively. The correlation coefficient of the absolute disruption index (Dz) with the Cumulative Citation for 5 years (CC 5 ) was 0.635. However, the average difference in the disruptive innovation and academic influence rankings of journals reached 20 places (about 17.5%). The average difference in the disruptive innovation and influence rankings of research papers reached about 2700 places (about 17.7%). The differences reflect the essential difference between the two evaluation systems. Second, the top 7 journals selected based on JDI, JCC 5 , JIF, and JCI were the same, and all of them were H-journals. Although 8 (8/15, 53%), 96 (96/150, 64%), and 880 (880/1500, 58.67%) of the top 0.1%, top 1%, and top 10% papers selected based on Dz and CC 5 , respectively, were the same. Third, research papers with the “changes clinical practice” tag showed only moderate innovation (4.96) and impact (241.67) levels but had high levels of peer-reviewed recognition (6.00) and attention (2.83).

Conclusions: The results of the study show that research evaluation based on innovative indicators is detached from the traditional impact evaluation system. The 3 evaluation systems (impact evaluation, disruptive innovation evaluation, and peer review) only have high consistency for authoritative journals and top papers. Neither a single impact indicator nor an innovative indicator can directly reflect the impact of medical research for clinical practice. How to establish an integrated, comprehensive, scientific, and reasonable journal evaluation system to improve the existing evaluation system of medical journals still needs further research.

Introduction

Scientific and technical journals play a crucial role in showcasing research findings, and the value orientation of their published results is closely intertwined with their evaluation orientation. However, since Garfield [ 1 ] put forward the idea that “citation analysis can be used as an evaluation tool for journals” in 1972, the evaluation system of journals based on academic impact has become mainstream. However, relying too much on impact indicators for evaluation may hurt academic research and discipline progress.

On the one hand, some scholars have long pointed out that ranking journals according to their impact factors is noncomprehensive and may lead to misleading conclusions [ 2 , 3 ]. Meanwhile, many academic journals and publishers have engaged in strategic self-citation, leading to an overinflated journal impact factor (JIF) [ 4 ]. Some editorial behaviors to enhance the JIF clearly violate academic norms [ 5 ]. Some scholars are overciting each other’s work to enhance their academic impact [ 6 ]. External contingencies can have a devastating effect on citation indicators [ 7 ]. Scientists themselves also present a mixed attitude toward impact factors [ 8 ].

On the other hand, despite all the benefits of increased academic impact to journals, there is a nonnegligible problem in the evaluation of journals that citation indicators essentially characterize the impact of journals rather than their disruptive innovation [ 9 ]. Relevant studies have confirmed that the level of disruptive innovation of scientific research is getting increasingly lower [ 10 ] and the progress in various disciplines is slowing [ 11 ]. This is often overlooked against the background of impact-only evaluations. Therefore, despite the urgent need for disruptive innovations in science [ 12 ], impact-based journal rankings have made it more difficult to accept novel results [ 13 ], replacing the “taste of science” with the “taste of publication” [ 14 ] in the actual environment.

The evaluation of academic journals is about not only the journals themselves [ 15 ] but also the wide use of the evaluation results in academic review, promotion, and tenure decisions [ 16 ]. Meanwhile, the quality and results of medical research are directly related to human health and life and have a direct impact on human health and well-being. Therefore, the general and internal medicine journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) in 2018 were chosen as the study object. The OpenCitations Index of PubMed open PMID-to-PMID citations (POCI) and H1 Connect databases were selected as the sources for citation relationship data and peer review data. We investigated the connections and contrasts between the academic impact, disruptive innovation level, and results of peer review for medical journals and published research papers. We also analyzed the similarities and differences as well as the fundamental causes of the varying evaluation results in terms of impact evaluation, disruptive innovation, and peer review for various types of medical research papers. We aimed to provide a reference for the correct understanding of the innovation level of the results published by journals; the scientific and reasonable evaluation of medical journals; and the construction of a scientific, objective, and fair academic evaluation system.

Research Object

Because there is basically no disruptive innovation in the review literature, this paper only focuses on the general and internal medicine journals indexed in SCIE in 2018 and the research papers involved. In addition, considering the computational efficiency, accuracy, and difficulty of data acquisition, research papers for which citation relationships in the aforementioned journals were not included in POCI and the journals with too few references (less than 10) were excluded. Finally, 114 journals were retained at the journal level, and 15,206 research papers were retained at the paper level.

Data Resource

The data acquired in this study included journal information, literature information, citation relationship data, and peer review data. The data were obtained through the Journal Citation Reports (JCR), Web of Science (WoS), POCI, and H1 Connect databases.

Of these databases, POCI is a Resource Description Framework (RDF) data set containing details of all the citations from publications bearing PMIDs to other PMID-identified publications harvested from the National Institutes of Health Open Citations Collection. POCI covers more than 29 million bibliographic resources and more than 717 million citation links (as of the last update in January 2023). Citations in POCI are not considered simple links but as data entities. This means that it is permissible to assign descriptive attributes to each citation, such as the date of creation of the citation, its time span, and its type [ 17 ].

H1 Connect (formerly Faculty Opinions), the world’s most authoritative peer review database in the biomedical field, incorporates the combined efforts of more than 8000 international authoritative experts from around the globe and is a knowledge discovery tool used to evaluate published research. H1 Connect’s reviewers are authoritative experts in the life sciences and medical fields. They provide commentary, opinions, and validation of key papers in their own field. The quality and rigor of the reviewers mean that researchers can be assured of the quality of the papers they recommend, and H1 Connect brings these recommendations together to recommend high-quality research to a wider audience. H1 Connect’s experts typically evaluate the “high level” of research literature in the field within 2 months of publication, with over 90% of recommendations made within 6 months of publication.

Data Acquisition and Processing

The data acquired for this study consisted of 3 parts. The specific steps for data acquisition and processing were (1) data acquisition and (2) data processing.

Data Acquisition

The steps taken to acquire the data included the following: log in to JCR; select Medicine, General & Internal in the “Browse categories” page; select JCR Year=2018 and Citation Indexes=SCIE in the filters; export the result to XLS format; according to the acquired journal title, select the publication year as 2018 and the literature type as Article to search the WoS core database; and export the full record of the journal literature in XLS format. Finally, we downloaded the related H1 Connect literature data and POCI data according to the list of journals.

Data Processing

To process the data, we undertook the following steps: use Navicat to import the full record of research papers into the local SQLite database, process the downloaded POCI data, extract the PMID numbers of all the focus papers from the full record, retrieve the references and citations of the focus papers as well as the citations of the references of the focus papers in the local database transformed based on the POCI data, and establish the relevant data tables for the subsequent calculations.

Evaluation Indicators

Innovation indicators.

Some researchers have observed, at an early stage, that some technological innovations complete and improve current technologies without replacing them while others outright eliminate technologies that were used in the past. However, for a long time, scholars did not analyze and explain the essence of this phenomenon. It was not until 1986 that Tushman and Anderson [ 18 ] summarized the phenomenon as follows: There are 2 types of major technological shifts that disrupt or enhance the capabilities of existing firms in an industry. However, Christensen [ 19 ], a professor at Harvard Business School in the United States, argued that disruptive innovations are new technologies that replace existing mainstream technologies in unexpected ways. Building on these views, Funk and Owen-Smith [ 20 ] provided deeper and more insightful insights. They argued that the dichotomy between disruptive and augmentative technologies lacks nuance and that the impact of new technologies on the status quo is a matter of degree rather than absolute impact.

In this regard, Govindarajan and Kopalle [ 21 ] also pointed out that disruptive innovation lacks reliable and valid measurement standards. Therefore, Funk and Owen-Smith [ 20 ] created the consolidation-disruption (CD) index, which aims to quantify the degree of technological change brought about by new patents. The index drew the attention of Wu et al [ 22 ], who analogized the basic principle of the CD index to measure disruption by calculating the citation substitution of the focus paper in the citation network and who were the first to apply the evaluation of disruptive innovation to the world of bibliometrics.

As an important carrier of academic results, it is important to evaluate papers quantitatively, rationally, and efficiently in terms of their innovation [ 23 ]. The disruption (D) index has received widespread attention after it was proposed by Wu et al [ 22 ]. A subset of scholars then explored disruptive papers in specific subject areas, including scientometrics [ 24 ], craniofacial surgery [ 25 ], pediatric surgery [ 26 ], synthetic biology [ 27 ], energy security [ 28 ], colorectal surgery [ 29 ], otolaryngology [ 30 ], military trauma [ 31 ], breast cancer [ 32 ], radiology [ 33 ], ophthalmology [ 34 ], plastic surgery [ 35 ], urology [ 36 ], and general surgery [ 37 ], based on the D index. Park et al [ 10 ] also analyzed the annual dynamics of the disruption level of papers and patents across the subject areas.

Another group of scholars conducted in-depth research on the index itself: Bornmann et al [ 38 ] explored the convergent validity of the index and the variants that may enhance the effectiveness of the measure and tested the validity of the D index based on the literature in the field of physics [ 39 ]. Ruan et al [ 40 ] provided an in-depth reflection on the limitations of the application of the D index as a measure of scientific and technological progress. Liu et al [ 41 , 42 ] empirically investigated the stabilization time window of the D index in different subject areas and addressed the mathematical inconsistency of the traditional D index and proposed an absolute disruption index (Dz; as in Equation 2) [ 43 ].

This series of studies has made it possible to evaluate the disruption of research papers based on the D index, which has gradually matured. On this basis, Jiang and Liu [ 44 ] proposed the Journal Disruption Index (JDI) to evaluate the disruptive innovation level of journals (as in Equation 3) and validated the evaluation effect of this indicator based on Chinese SCIE journals [ 45 ].

In Equations 1, 2, and 3, N F refers to the literature that only cites the focus paper (FP), N B refers to the literature that cites both the focus paper and at least one reference (R) of the focus paper, and N R refers to the literature that only cites at least one reference (R) of the focus paper but not the focus paper. n is the number of “Article” type pieces of literature contained in the journal, and Dz i is the Dz of the i th article in the journal.

In this study, Dz and JDI were chosen to evaluate the disruption of the selected studies at the literature and journal levels, respectively. Bornmann and Tekles [ 46 ] argued that 3 years is necessary regardless of the measurement for that discipline. Considering that, in the determination of the stabilization time window of the D index for each discipline conducted by Liu et al [ 42 ], the stabilization time window for clinical medicine is 4 years after publication. Therefore, in the process of calculating Dz in this paper, the citation time window of the focus papers was set to 2018 to 2022 to ensure the validity of the results. In addition, because the JDI value was too small, we multiplied the JDI by 1000 in all subsequent presentations.

Peer Review Indicators

The peer review indicators selected for this study included the peer review score (PScore), weighted peer review stars (PStar_w), and weighted peer review evaluation times (PTime_w). In this case, the weighted indicators refer to the weighting of ratings and number of evaluations by the number of evaluators when an evaluation was completed by more than one reviewer.

The advantage of using peer review indicators is that it can make up for the lag and one-sidedness of relying solely on the citations among the literature to assess the quality of the literature. It also corrects the shortcomings of the traditional JIF to judge the quality of the literature. Compared with a single impact indicator, it is more scientific.

Impact Indicators

The impact indicators selected for this study included the Cumulative Citation for 5 years (CC 5 ), JIF, Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), and Journal Cumulative Citation for 5 years (JCC 5 ). Among these, JIF is the total number of citations for scholarly articles published in the journal in the past 2 years divided by the total number of citable articles. JCI is the average Category Normalized Citation Impact (CNCI) of the citable literature published in the specific journal in the previous 3 years. The JCC 5 is obtained by dividing the sum of the citation frequencies recorded in the POCI repository of the corresponding research papers (focus papers) of the selected journals for the years 2018 to 2022 by the number of research papers published by the journal (as in Equation 4).

In Equation 4, a i C t represents the number of citations of the i th research paper of the journal in year t, and n is the number of research papers published by the journal.

Evaluation and Correlation Analyses of Journals Under Different Evaluation Perspectives

Analysis of differences in academic influence and level of disruptive innovation of journals.

The academic impact and level of disruptive innovation of the selected 114 journals, the results of the correlation analyses of the indicators, and the differences in the rankings are shown in Table 1 , Table 2 , and Figure 1 , respectively. From these, we can see that (1) journals that are at the top of the ranking of impact indicators are usually also ranked at the top in the ranking of disruptive innovation, (2) journals at the bottom of the impact rankings are usually at the bottom of the innovation rankings, and (3) there is little difference in the ranking results of journals under different impact indicators, but there is a big difference in the ranking results of influence and disruptive innovation. Although there are moderate correlations between the JDI of journals and the 3 influence indicators of JIF, JCI, and JCC 5 , the average difference between the disruptive innovation ranking and academic influence ranking of the journals included in the study reached 20 places.

a JCC 5 : Journal Cumulative Citation for 5 years.

b JDI: Journal Disruption Index.

c JIF: Journal Impact Factor.

d JCI: Journal Citation Indicator.

a JDI: Journal Disruption Index.

b JCC 5 : Journal Cumulative Citation for 5 years.

e Not applicable.

Analysis of the Differences Between the Journals’ Impact and Disruption and the Results of Peer Review

In order to better analyze the differences between the academic impact and level of disruptive innovation with peer-reviewed results of journals in the field of general and internal medicine, papers indexed in H1 Connect were referred to as “H-papers,” and the source journals of “H-papers” are referred to as “H-journals.” The evaluation indicators, ranking of H-journals, and the percentage of H-papers are shown in Table 3 and Table 4 . We can see that (1) the top 7 journals in terms of both academic impact and disruptive innovation are all H-journals, (2) the average impact ranking of H-journals is higher than the average innovation ranking, and (3) some journals with low impact and innovation also became H-journals.

a JPScore: journal peer review score.

b JPTime_w: weighted journal peer review evaluation time.

c JFPStar_w: weighted journal peer review star.

b JIF: Journal Impact Factor.

c JCI: Journal Citation Indicator.

Evaluation and Correlation Analyses of Papers Under Different Evaluation Perspectives

Analysis of differences in academic impact and level of disruptive innovation of papers.

Ideally, if an article is accepted by a specific journal, it is because its overall quality is similar to other papers previously published in that journal [ 47 ]. However, journal-level indicators are, at best, only moderately suggestive of the quality of an article [ 48 ], which makes indicators that measure specific articles more popular [ 49 ]. Therefore, in this study, research papers in the field of general and internal medicine were also evaluated in terms of their academic impact and level of disruptive innovation, and the results are shown in Figure 2 . From the results, we can see that research papers that rank high in the impact ranking usually also rank high in the disruptive innovation ranking. There were 8 (8/15, 53%), 96 (96/150, 64%), and 880 (880/1500, 58.67%) of the Top 0.1%, Top 1%, and Top 10% papers, respectively, selected based on the Dz and CC 5 that were the same. Second, the level of disruptive innovation of research papers with the same level of impact varied greatly, and the impact level of research papers with the same level of disruptive innovation also varied greatly. Third, despite the high correlation ( r =0.635, P <.001) between the Dz and CC 5 of the selected research papers, the average difference between their innovation and impact rankings reached about 2700. Fourth, the actual analysis results showed no correlation between the innovation of the selected research paper and the number of references, which indicates that the Dz index is basically unaffected by the difference in the number of references in the actual evaluation process ( r =0.006, P =.43).

Analysis of Differences Between Papers’ Impact and Disruption and the Results of Peer Review

In order to better analyze the differences between the academic impact, level of disruptive innovation, and peer review results of journal research papers in the field of general and internal medicine, the differences between the academic impact and disruptive innovation level and the peer review results of H-papers were analyzed. The specific results are shown in Table 5 and Figure 3 . From the results, we see that there were 8 (8/15, 53%), 65 (65/150, 43.3%), and 187 (187/1500, 12.47%) H-papers among the top 0.1%, top 1%, and top 10% papers, respectively, selected based on Dz. There were 5 (5/15, 33%), 74 (74/150, 49.3%), and 220 (220/1500, 14.67%) H-papers among the top 0.1%, top 1%, and top 10% papers, respectively, selected based on CC 5 . Second, there was a significant positive correlation between the peer review indicators, disruptive innovation indicators, and academic impact indicators of H-papers, reflecting the consistency between the quantitative evaluation and peer review at the overall level. Third, the average impact ranking of H-papers was 865 (top 5.68%), and the average disruptive innovation ranking was 1726 (top 11.35%), which means that the average impact ranking of H-papers was higher than the average disruptive innovation ranking. Fourth, some papers with low academic impact and disruptive innovation level also became H-papers. Fifth, compared with the CC 5 , Dz has a minor correlation advantage with PTime_w and PStar_w.

a CC 5 : Cumulative Citation for 5 years.

b Dz: absolute disruption index.

c PTime_w: weighted peer review evaluation times.

d PStar_w: weighted peer review stars.

e PScore: peer review score.

f Not applicable.

In addition to rating and commenting on the included research papers, different labels are added by the reviewers of articles in H1 Connect according to their different internal characteristics. The relevant definitions are shown in Table 6 (refer to Du et al [ 50 ]). We categorized and counted the 257 H-papers (in this study, if a paper had more than 1 tag, it was counted separately in the calculation of each tag), and the results are shown in Table 7 . From this, we can see that (1) research papers with the tags in the “Novel Drug Target,” “Technical Advance,” and “New Finding” categories had a high academic impact and a high disruptive innovation level; (2) research papers with the “Changes Clinical Practice” tag showed only a moderate academic impact and disruptive innovation level but had high levels of peer-reviewed recognition and attention; (3) experts showed higher recognition and concern for research papers with tags of “Negative/Null Result,” “Controversial,” “Refutation,” and “Interesting Hypothesis,” but their academic impact and disruptive innovation level were lower than others.

c PScore: peer review score.

e PTime_w: weighted peer review evaluation times.

Principal Findings

Evaluation of disruptive innovation is detached from the traditional evaluation system.

From these research results, large differences were seen between the innovation and impact rankings of the journals and research papers included in the study. This is also consistent with the findings of Guo and Zhou [ 51 ]. This phenomenon reflects the essential difference between the 2 different evaluation systems. It also proves that the evaluation of the disruptive innovation of research papers and journals based on Dz and JDI is not consistent with the traditional evaluation system of impact.

The essence of disruptive evaluation is to measure the innovation from the substitution level of knowledge structure. This evaluation method brings new ideas to the field of scientific research evaluation, helps relevant institutions and scholars remove the constraints of the traditional evaluation system, and helps to establish a value orientation of encouraging innovation for scientific research and scientific and technological journals, so as to promote the benign development of the academic ecology.

The 3 Evaluation Systems Only Have High Consensus on the Top Object

Although, given the consistency of scientific evaluation, there will be some uniformity in the level of disruptive innovation, level of academic impact, and peer review results of journals as well as research papers.

However, from the research results presented in this paper, we can see that (1) the top 7 journals in terms of both academic impact and disruptive innovation were all H-journals, (2) more than one-half of the top papers selected based on Dz and CC 5 were the same, (3) the average H-papers were ranked at the top in terms of impact and innovation, and (4) the results of the different evaluation systems only had high consensus on the authoritative journals and top papers in the field.

These findings are also consistent with those of Goman [ 52 ] and Chi et al [ 53 ]. A fundamental reason for this phenomenon is that the purposes of the 3 evaluation systems are inherently different. Therefore, in the actual evaluation process, the 3 kinds of indicators are not interchangeable, and the combination of the 3 evaluation systems may be a feasible solution to establish a comprehensive, scientific, and reasonable journal evaluation system.

A Single Indicator Cannot Accurately Reflect the Impact of Medical Research on Clinical Practice Alone

From the aforementioned findings, we can see that research papers of the “Novel Drug Target,” “ Technical Advance,” and “New Finding” types have high academic impact and high levels of innovation, which is in line with their classification definitions. This is also consistent with the findings of Du et al [ 50 ], Thelwall et al [ 54 ], and Jiang and Liu [ 55 ]. Second, research papers of the “Changes Clinical Practice” type showed only moderate levels of innovation and impact but had high levels of peer-reviewed recognition and attention. This reflects the difficulty of evaluating the impact of a particular academic paper on clinical practice, whether the evaluation system is based on academic impact or level of disruptive innovation. Third, peer-reviewed experts show higher recognition and concern for research papers of the types “Negative/Null Result,” “Controversial,” “Refutation,” and “Interesting Hypothesis,” but the level of impact and disruptive innovation of these papers are lower. This partly reflects the current academic community’s excessive focus on positive results; deliberate avoidance of negative results; and overall lack of support for debatable, falsified, and other types of research.

Several scholars have recently suggested that the evaluation system of medical journals should be redesigned for contemporary clinical impact and utility [ 56 ]. In this regard, Thelwall and Maflahi [ 57 ] advocated that the references of a guideline are an important basis for studying clinical value. However, Traylor and Herrmann-Lingen [ 58 ] found only a weak correlation between the number of citations to individual journals in the guidelines and their respective JIF. Therefore, the JIF is not a suitable tool for assessing the clinical relevance of medical research. The results of this study similarly found that research papers of the “Changes Clinical Practice” type showed only moderate levels of disruptive innovation and academic impact, but such research papers received higher recognition and attention from peer review experts. Therefore, combining quantitative evaluation with peer review may be a feasible way to measure the impact of medical research on clinical practice.

Limitations

However, this study also has the following limitations. First, papers in the medical field have a preference for citing review articles [ 59 ], which has a certain impact on the evaluation of the disruptive innovation of research papers. Second, the scoring mechanism provided to its reviewers by H1 Connect has a low differentiation degree and cannot perfectly distinguish the differences in quality between papers yet. In addition, H1 Connect has too few evaluators. Brezis and Birukou [ 60 ] illustrated that, if the number of reviewers is increased to about 10, the correlation between the results and the quality of the paper will be significantly improved. However, it is difficult to seek so many high-quality experts who are willing to accept open peer review in the high pressure environment of “Publish or Perish” [ 61 ]. Third, since the citation data sources used in this study are all based on PubMed data, this study also suffers from the problem of missing references and citations that are not labeled with a PMID, which affects the accuracy of the evaluation results to a certain extent. In future studies, we will obtain more accurate measurement results by jointly using multiple sources of citation data.

Conclusions

In this study, the general and internal medicine journals indexed in SCIE in 2018 were chosen as the study object. The POCI and H1 Connect databases were selected as sources of citation relationship data and peer review data. We investigated the connections and contrasts between the academic impact, level of disruptive innovation, and results of peer review for medical journals and published research papers. We also analyzed the similarities and differences as well as the fundamental causes of the varying evaluation results in terms of impact evaluation, disruptive innovation, and peer review for various types of medical research papers.

The results of this study show that the evaluation of scientific research based on the innovation index is detached from the traditional impact evaluation system, the 3 evaluation systems only have high consistency for authoritative journals and top papers, and neither the single impact index nor the innovation index can directly reflect the impact of medical research on clinical practice.

In addition, with the increasing importance of replicative science, the accuracy of statistical reports, evidential value of reported data, and replicability of given experimental results [ 62 ] should also be included in the examination of journal quality. How to establish a comprehensive, all-encompassing, scientific, and reasonable journal evaluation system needs to be further investigated.

Acknowledgments

XL was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (23BTQ085), Major Project of Basic Research on Philosophy and Social Sciences in Henan Universities (2024-JCZD-23).

Data Availability

All citation data can be obtained from [ 63 ].

Authors' Contributions

XL conceptualized the study, reviewed and edited the manuscript, and supervised the study. YJ was responsible for the methodology, provided the software and other resources, performed the formal analysis, and wrote the original manuscript draft. YJ and XL acquired funding. YJ, XY, and ZZ curated the data. XY and ZZ also contributed to the study investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

• Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. Nov 03, 1972;178(4060):471-479. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Hansson S. Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. Lancet. Sep 30, 1995;346(8979):906. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Metze K, Borges da Silva FA. Ranking of journals by journal impact factors is not exact and may provoke misleading conclusions. J Clin Pathol. May 11, 2022;75(10):649-650. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Siler K, Larivière V. Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation. Research Policy. Dec 2022;51(10):104608. [ CrossRef ]
• Martin BR. Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not? Research Policy. Feb 2016;45(1):1-7. [ CrossRef ]
• Zaidi SJA, Taqi M. Citation cartels in medical and dental journals. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. Jun 01, 2023;33(6):700-701. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Fassin Y. Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics. Scientometrics. May 07, 2021;126(6):5305-5319. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Buela-Casal G, Zych I. What do the scientists think about the impact factor? Scientometrics. Feb 22, 2012;92(2):281-292. [ CrossRef ]
• Thelwall M, Kousha K, Stuart E, Makita M, Abdoli M, Wilson P, et al. In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? Asso for Info Science & Tech. May 04, 2023;74(8):941-953. [ CrossRef ]
• Park M, Leahey E, Funk R. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature. Jan 2023;613(7942):138-144. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Chu JSG, Evans JA. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct 12, 2021;118(41):1. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Schattner U, Shatner M. Science desperately needs disruptive innovation. Qeios. Jun 07, 2023:1. [ CrossRef ]
• Liang Z, Mao J, Li G. Bias against scientific novelty: A prepublication perspective. Asso for Info Science & Tech. Nov 19, 2022;74(1):99-114. [ CrossRef ]
• Osterloh M, Frey BS. Ranking games. Eval Rev. Aug 04, 2014;39(1):102-129. [ CrossRef ]
• Kulczycki E, Huang Y, Zuccala AA, Engels TCE, Ferrara A, Guns R, et al. Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe. Asso for Info Science & Tech. Aug 13, 2022;73(12):1741-1754. [ CrossRef ]
• McKiernan E, Schimanski L, Muñoz Nieves C, Matthias L, Niles M, Alperin J. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. Elife. Jul 31, 2019;8:8. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Heibi I, Peroni S, Shotton D. Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations. Scientometrics. Sep 14, 2019;121(2):1213-1228. [ CrossRef ]
• Tushman ML, Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly. Sep 1986;31(3):439. [ CrossRef ]
• Christensen CM. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Management of Innovation and Change). Boston, MA. Harvard Business Review Press; 1997.
• Funk RJ, Owen-Smith J. A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science. Mar 2017;63(3):791-817. [ CrossRef ]
• Govindarajan V, Kopalle PK. Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal. Dec 22, 2005;27(2):189-199. [ CrossRef ]
• Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature. Feb 13, 2019;566(7744):378-382. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Kostoff RN, Boylan R, Simons GR. Disruptive technology roadmaps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Jan 2004;71(1-2):141-159. [ CrossRef ]
• Bornmann L, Devarakonda S, Tekles A, Chacko G. Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019). Scientometrics. Mar 14, 2020;123(2):1149-1155. [ CrossRef ]
• Horen S, Hansdorfer M, Kronshtal R, Dorafshar A, Becerra A. The most disruptive publications in craniofacial surgery (1954-2014). J Craniofac Surg. Oct 01, 2021;32(7):2426-2430. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Sullivan GA, Skertich NJ, Gulack BC, Becerra AZ, Shah AN. Shifting paradigms: The top 100 most disruptive papers in core pediatric surgery journals. J Pediatr Surg. Aug 2021;56(8):1263-1274. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Meyer C, Nakamura Y, Rasor BJ, Karim AS, Jewett MC, Tan C. Analysis of the innovation trend in cell-free synthetic biology. Life (Basel). Jun 11, 2021;11(6):551. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Jiang Y, Liu X. A bibliometric analysis and disruptive innovation evaluation for the field of energy security. Sustainability. Jan 05, 2023;15(2):969. [ CrossRef ]
• Becerra A, Grimes C, Grunvald M, Underhill J, Bhama A, Govekar H, et al. A new bibliometric index: the top 100 most disruptive and developmental publications in colorectal surgery journals. Dis Colon Rectum. Mar 01, 2022;65(3):429-443. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Sheth AH, Hengartner A, Abdou H, Salehi PP, Becerra AZ, Lerner MZ. Disruption index in otolaryngology: uncovering a bibliometric history of a rapidly evolving field. Laryngoscope. Feb 19, 2024;134(2):629-636. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Dilday J, Gallagher S, Bram R, Williams E, Grigorian A, Matsushima K, et al. Citation versus disruption in the military: Analysis of the top disruptive military trauma research publications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. May 15, 2023;95(2S):S157-S169. [ CrossRef ]
• Grunvald M, Williams M, Rao R, O’Donoghue C, Becerra A. 100 disruptive publications in breast cancer research. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. Aug 01, 2021;22(8):2385-2389. [ CrossRef ]
• Abu-Omar A, Kennedy P, Yakub M, Robbins J, Yassin A, Verma N, et al. Extra credit for disruption: trend of disruption in radiology academic journals. Clin Radiol. Dec 2022;77(12):893-901. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Patel PA, Javed Ali M. Characterizing innovation in science through the disruption index. Semin Ophthalmol. Aug 18, 2022;37(6):790-791. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Neubauer DC, Blum JD, Labou SG, Heskett KM, Calvo RY, Reid CM, et al. Using the disruptive score to identify publications that changed plastic surgery practice. Ann Plast Surg. 2022;88(4):S385-S390. [ CrossRef ]
• Khusid JA, Gupta M, Sadiq AS, Atallah WM, Becerra AZ. Changing the status quo: the 100 most-disruptive papers in urology? Urology. Jul 2021;153:56-68. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Williams MD, Grunvald MW, Skertich NJ, Hayden DM, O'Donoghue C, Torquati A, et al. Disruption in general surgery: Randomized controlled trials and changing paradigms. Surgery. Dec 2021;170(6):1862-1866. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Bornmann L, Devarakonda S, Tekles A, Chacko G. Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers. Quantitative Science Studies. Aug 2020;1(3):1242-1259. [ CrossRef ]
• Bu Y, Waltman L, Huang Y. A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications. Quantitative Science Studies. 2021;2(1):155-183. [ CrossRef ]
• Ruan X, Lyu D, Gong K, Cheng Y, Li J. Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Nov 2021;172:121071. [ CrossRef ]
• Liu X, Shen Z, Liao Y, Yang L. The research about the improved disruption index and its influencing factors. Library and Information Service. 2020;64(24):84-91. [ CrossRef ]
• Liu X, Shen Z, Liao Y, Zhu M, Yang L. Research on the stable time window of disruption index. Library and Information Service. 2021;65(18):49-57. [ CrossRef ]
• Liu X, Liao Y, Zhu M. A preliminary study on the application of disruption index to scientific research evaluation. Information Studies: Theory & Application. 2021;44(12):34-40. [ CrossRef ]
• Jiang Y, Liu X. A construction and empirical research of the journal disruption index based on open citation data. Scientometrics. May 18, 2023;128(7):3935-3958. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Jiang Y, Wang L, Liu X. Innovative evaluation of Chinese SCIE-indexed scientific journals: An empirical study based on the disruption index. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals. 2023;34(8):1060-1068. [ CrossRef ]
• Bornmann L, Tekles A. Disruption index depends on length of citation window. EPI. Mar 25, 2019;28(2):1. [ CrossRef ]
• Migheli M, Ramello GB. The unbearable lightness of scientometric indices. Manage Decis Econ. Nov 04, 2021;42(8):1933-1944. [ CrossRef ]
• Thelwall M, Kousha K, Makita M, Abdoli M, Stuart E, Wilson P, et al. In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles? Scientometrics. May 18, 2023;128(7):3915-3933. [ CrossRef ]
• Iyengar KP, Vaishya R. Article-level metrics: A new approach to quantify reach and impact of published research. J Orthop. Jun 2023;40:83-86. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Du J, Tang X, Wu Y. The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and 1000 recommendations. Asso for Info Science & Tech. Jun 2015;67(12):3008-3021. [ CrossRef ]
• Guo L, Zhou Q. Research on characteristics of disruptive papers and their correlation with traditional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Intelligence. 2021;40(1):183-207. [ CrossRef ]
• Gorman DM, Huber C. Ranking of addiction journals in eight widely used impact metrics. J Behav Addict. Jul 13, 2022;11(2):348-360. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Chi P, Ding J, Leng F. Characteristics of the technology impact of breakthrough papers in biology and medicine. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 2022;41(7):675. [ CrossRef ]
• Thelwall M, Kousha K, Abdoli M. Is medical research informing professional practice more highly cited? Evidence from AHFS DI Essentials in drugs.com. Scientometrics. Feb 21, 2017;112(1):509-527. [ CrossRef ]
• Jiang Y, Liu X. The relationship between absolute disruption index, peer review index and CNCI: a study based on virology papers. Library and Information Service. 2023;67(3):96-105. [ CrossRef ]
• Klein-Fedyshin M, Ketchum A. PubMed's core clinical journals filter: redesigned for contemporary clinical impact and utility. J Med Libr Assoc. Jul 10, 2023;111(3):665-676. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Thelwall M, Maflahi N. Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research. Asso for Info Science & Tech. Mar 17, 2015;67(4):960-966. [ CrossRef ]
• Traylor C, Herrmann-Lingen C. Does the journal impact factor reflect the impact of German medical guideline contributions? Scientometrics. Feb 03, 2023;128(3):1951-1962. [ CrossRef ]
• Marks MS, Marsh MC, Schroer TA, Stevens TH. An alarming trend within the biological/biomedical research literature toward the citation of review articles rather than the primary research papers. Traffic. Jan 19, 2013;14(1):1-1. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Brezis ES, Birukou A. Arbitrariness in the peer review process. Scientometrics. Feb 03, 2020;123(1):393-411. [ CrossRef ]
• Jiang Y, Liu X. Open peer review: Mode, technology, problems, and countermeasures. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals. 2022;33(9):1196-1205. [ CrossRef ]
• Dougherty MR, Horne Z. Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences. R Soc Open Sci. Aug 17, 2022;9(8):220334. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• COCI CSV dataset of all the citation data. Figshare. Feb 07, 2023. URL: https:/​/figshare.​com/​articles/​dataset/​Crossref_Open_Citation_Index_CSV_dataset_of_all_the_citation_data/​6741422?file=37483791 [accessed 2024-05-24]

Abbreviations

Edited by S Ma; submitted 04.12.23; peer-reviewed by O Beiki, C Oo; comments to author 28.02.24; revised version received 16.04.24; accepted 29.04.24; published 31.05.24.

©Yuyan Jiang, Xue-li Liu, Zixuan Zhang, Xinru Yang. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.05.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

This page uses technologies your browser does not support.

Many of our new website's features will not function and basic layout will appear broken.

Visit browsehappy.com to learn how to upgrade your browser.

• university of new orleans
• campus news
• in memoriam: philosophy professor frank schalow

CAMPUS NEWS: MAY 30, 2024

In memoriam, in memoriam: philosophy professor frank schalow.

Share this article

Frank Schalow, a University of New Orleans philosophy faculty member, died May 25, 2024.

Frank Schalow, a University of New Orleans philosophy faculty member for nearly three decades and an internationally renowned authority on German philosopher Martin Heidegger, died on May 25 at the age of 68.

Schalow started his career at UNO in 1995 as an adjunct faculty member. In 2001, he was promoted to assistant professor and became a full professor in 2010. He taught classes including Introduction to Philosophy, Social Ethics, Ethics, The Philosophy of Kant and The Philosophy of Heidegger.

Schalow was a prolific author and researcher. He wrote 12 books on Heidegger and was the longtime co-editor of “Heidegger Studies,” an international journal published in four languages. Considered one of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century, Heidegger was best known for his philosophy of existentialism. Schalow’s other areas of research interest included ethics, medical ethics, phenomenology, and 19th and 20th century German thought.

“Dr. Schalow had the admiration of his students and the respect of his colleagues,” said Robert Stufflebeam, associate professor of philosophy. “He was the embodiment of the philosophy professor stereotype. He was brilliant, but quirky. He always wore a tie, even if it bore no stylistic relation to whatever shirt he was wearing. He always spoke thoughtfully and logically. He was never heard to raise his voice in anger. The philosophy program has suffered a great loss. Professor Schalow was one of a kind. He will be missed.”

In addition to the dozen books he authored on Heidegger, Schalow co-edited three books, wrote 16 chapters, and authored several dozen journal articles, review essays, critical discussions and book reviews, Stufflebeam said.

According to colleagues, Schalow’s commitment to his discipline was matched only by his devotion to the stray cats for which he cared for in his New Orleans neighborhood and his beloved New York Yankees.

Schalow earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Denver, and both a master’s and doctorate in philosophy from Tulane University.

Student Access and Success Drives UNO’s New Enrollment VP

Uno-delgado partnership to enhance transfer student success in biology.

UNO and Innsbruck Students Create ‘History Exchange,’ An Oral History Podcast