procurement research papers

Journal of Public Procurement

  • Submit your paper
  • Author guidelines
  • Editorial team
  • Indexing & metrics
  • Calls for papers & news

Before you start

For queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision, please contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For queries post acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. These details can be found in the Editorial Team section.

Author responsibilities

Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is that you will:

  • Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.
  • Be accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity .
  • Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.
  • Include anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the acknowledgements).
  • Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.
  • In accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools , Large Language Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the published work. The author(s) must describe the content created or modified as well as appropriately cite the name and version of the AI tool used; any additional works drawn on by the AI tool should also be appropriately cited and referenced. Standard tools that are used to improve spelling and grammar are not included within the parameters of this guidance. The Editor and Publisher reserve the right to determine whether the use of an AI tool is permissible.
  • If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent .

Generative AI usage key principles

  • Copywriting any part of an article using a generative AI tool/LLM would not be permissible, including the generation of the abstract or the literature review, for as per Emerald’s authorship criteria, the author(s) must be responsible for the work and accountable for its accuracy, integrity, and validity.
  • The generation or reporting of results using a generative AI tool/LLM is not permissible, for as per Emerald’s authorship criteria, the author(s) must be responsible for the creation and interpretation of their work and accountable for its accuracy, integrity, and validity.
  • The in-text reporting of statistics using a generative AI tool/LLM is not permissible due to concerns over the authenticity, integrity, and validity of the data produced, although the use of such a tool to aid in the analysis of the work would be permissible.
  • Copy-editing an article using a generative AI tool/LLM in order to improve its language and readability would be permissible as this mirrors standard tools already employed to improve spelling and grammar, and uses existing author-created material, rather than generating wholly new content, while the author(s) remains responsible for the original work.
  • The submission and publication of images created by AI tools or large-scale generative models is not permitted.

Research and publishing ethics

Our editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we publish is ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we closely follow the advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) website .

We have also developed our research and publishing ethics guidelines . If you haven’t already read these, we urge you to do so – they will help you avoid the most common publishing ethics issues.

A few key points:

  • Any manuscript you submit to this journal should be original. That means it should not have been published before in its current, or similar, form. Exceptions to this rule are outlined in our pre-print and conference paper policies .  If any substantial element of your paper has been previously published, you need to declare this to the journal editor upon submission. Please note, the journal editor may use  Crossref Similarity Check  to check on the originality of submissions received. This service compares submissions against a database of 49 million works from 800 scholarly publishers.
  • Your work should not have been submitted elsewhere and should not be under consideration by any other publication.
  • If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon submission; this allows the editor to decide how they would like to proceed. Read about conflict of interest in our research and publishing ethics guidelines .
  • By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing that the work is not in infringement of any existing copyright.

Third party copyright permissions

Prior to article submission, you need to ensure you’ve applied for, and received, written permission to use any material in your manuscript that has been created by a third party. Please note, we are unable to publish any article that still has permissions pending. The rights we require are:

  • Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the article or book chapter.
  • Print and electronic rights.
  • Worldwide English-language rights.
  • To use the material for the life of the work. That means there should be no time restrictions on its re-use e.g. a one-year licence.

We are a member of the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) and participate in the STM permissions guidelines , a reciprocal free exchange of material with other STM publishers.  In some cases, this may mean that you don’t need permission to re-use content. If so, please highlight this at the submission stage.

Please take a few moments to read our guide to publishing permissions  to ensure you have met all the requirements, so that we can process your submission without delay.

Open access submissions and information

All our journals currently offer two open access (OA) publishing paths; gold open access and green open access.

If you would like to, or are required to, make the branded publisher PDF (also known as the version of record) freely available immediately upon publication, you can select the gold open access route once your paper is accepted. 

If you’ve chosen to publish gold open access, this is the point you will be asked to pay the APC (article processing charge) . This varies per journal and can be found on our APC price list or on the editorial system at the point of submission. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence , which outlines how readers can reuse your work.

Alternatively, if you would like to, or are required to, publish open access but your funding doesn’t cover the cost of the APC, you can choose the green open access, or self-archiving, route. As soon as your article is published, you can make the author accepted manuscript (the version accepted for publication) openly available, free from payment and embargo periods.

You can find out more about our open access routes, our APCs and waivers and read our FAQs on our open research page. 

Find out about open

Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines

We are a signatory of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines , a framework that supports the reproducibility of research through the adoption of transparent research practices. That means we encourage you to:

  • Cite and fully reference all data, program code, and other methods in your article.
  • Include persistent identifiers, such as a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), in references for datasets and program codes. Persistent identifiers ensure future access to unique published digital objects, such as a piece of text or datasets. Persistent identifiers are assigned to datasets by digital archives, such as institutional repositories and partners in the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences (Data-PASS).
  • Follow appropriate international and national procedures with respect to data protection, rights to privacy and other ethical considerations, whenever you cite data. For further guidance please refer to our  research and publishing ethics guidelines . For an example on how to cite datasets, please refer to the references section below.

Prepare your submission

Manuscript support services.

We are pleased to partner with Editage, a platform that connects you with relevant experts in language support, translation, editing, visuals, consulting, and more. After you’ve agreed a fee, they will work with you to enhance your manuscript and get it submission-ready.

This is an optional service for authors who feel they need a little extra support. It does not guarantee your work will be accepted for review or publication.

Visit Editage

Manuscript requirements

Before you submit your manuscript, it’s important you read and follow the guidelines below. You will also find some useful tips in our structure your journal submission how-to guide.

Article files should be provided in Microsoft Word format.

While you are welcome to submit a PDF of the document alongside the Word file, PDFs alone are not acceptable. LaTeX files can also be used but only if an accompanying PDF document is provided. Acceptable figure file types are listed further below.

Articles should be between 8000  and 10000 words in length. This includes all text, for example, the structured abstract, references, all text in tables, and figures and appendices. 

Please allow 280 words for each figure or table.

A concisely worded title should be provided.

The names of all contributing authors should be added to the ScholarOne submission; please list them in the order in which you’d like them to be published. Each contributing author will need their own ScholarOne author account, from which we will extract the following details:

(institutional preferred). . We will reproduce it exactly, so any middle names and/or initials they want featured must be included. . This should be where they were based when the research for the paper was conducted.

In multi-authored papers, it’s important that ALL authors that have made a significant contribution to the paper are listed. Those who have provided support but have not contributed to the research should be featured in an acknowledgements section. You should never include people who have not contributed to the paper or who don’t want to be associated with the research. Read about our for authorship.

If you want to include these items, save them in a separate Microsoft Word document and upload the file with your submission. Where they are included, a brief professional biography of not more than 100 words should be supplied for each named author.

Your article must reference all sources of external research funding in the acknowledgements section. You should describe the role of the funder or financial sponsor in the entire research process, from study design to submission.

All submissions must include a structured abstract, following the format outlined below.

These four sub-headings and their accompanying explanations must always be included:

The following three sub-headings are optional and can be included, if applicable:


You can find some useful tips in our  how-to guide.

The maximum length of your abstract should be 250 words in total, including keywords and article classification (see the sections below).

Your submission should include up to 12 appropriate and short keywords that capture the principal topics of the paper. Our  how to guide contains some practical guidance on choosing search-engine friendly keywords.

Please note, while we will always try to use the keywords you’ve suggested, the in-house editorial team may replace some of them with matching terms to ensure consistency across publications and improve your article’s visibility.

During the submission process, you will be asked to select a type for your paper; the options are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:

You will also be asked to select a category for your paper. The options for this are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:

 Reports on any type of research undertaken by the author(s), including:

 Covers any paper where content is dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation. This includes journalistic and magazine-style pieces.

 Describes and evaluates technical products, processes or services.

 Focuses on developing hypotheses and is usually discursive. Covers philosophical discussions and comparative studies of other authors’ work and thinking.

 Describes actual interventions or experiences within organizations. It can be subjective and doesn’t generally report on research. Also covers a description of a legal case or a hypothetical case study used as a teaching exercise.

 This category should only be used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate and/or critique the literature in a particular field. It could be a selective bibliography providing advice on information sources, or the paper may aim to cover the main contributors to the development of a topic and explore their different views.

 Provides an overview or historical examination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. Papers are likely to be more descriptive or instructional (‘how to’ papers) than discursive.

Headings must be concise, with a clear indication of the required hierarchy. 

The preferred format is for first level headings to be in bold, and subsequent sub-headings to be in medium italics.

Notes or endnotes should only be used if absolutely necessary. They should be identified in the text by consecutive numbers enclosed in square brackets. These numbers should then be listed, and explained, at the end of the article.

All figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings, webpages/screenshots, and photographic images) should be submitted electronically. Both colour and black and white files are accepted.

There are a few other important points to note:

Tables should be typed and submitted in a separate file to the main body of the article. The position of each table should be clearly labelled in the main body of the article with corresponding labels clearly shown in the table file. Tables should be numbered consecutively in Roman numerals (e.g. I, II, etc.).

Give each table a brief title. Ensure that any superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the relevant items and have explanations displayed as footnotes to the table, figure or plate.

Where tables, figures, appendices, and other additional content are supplementary to the article but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it, you can choose to host these supplementary files alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content-hosting platform (this is Emerald's recommended option as we are able to ensure the data remain accessible), or on an alternative trusted online repository. All supplementary material must be submitted prior to acceptance.

Emerald recommends that authors use the following two lists when searching for a suitable and trusted repository:

   

, you must submit these as separate files alongside your article. Files should be clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the file name is descriptive and that it follows the format ‘Supplementary_material_appendix_1’ or ‘Supplementary tables’. All supplementary material must be mentioned at the appropriate moment in the main text of the article; there is no need to include the content of the file only the file name. A link to the supplementary material will be added to the article during production, and the material will be made available alongside the main text of the article at the point of EarlyCite publication.

Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to the material; it will not be copy-edited or typeset, and authors will not receive proofs of this content. Emerald therefore strongly recommends that you style all supplementary material ahead of acceptance of the article.

Emerald Insight can host the following file types and extensions:

, you should ensure that the supplementary material is hosted on the repository ahead of submission, and then include a link only to the repository within the article. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that the material is free to access and that it remains permanently available. Where an alternative trusted online repository is used, the files hosted should always be presented as read-only; please be aware that such usage risks compromising your anonymity during the review process if the repository contains any information that may enable the reviewer to identify you; as such, we recommend that all links to alternative repositories are reviewed carefully prior to submission.

Please note that extensive supplementary material may be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of the material (for example, whether including it would support the reviewer making a decision on the article during the peer review process).

All references in your manuscript must be formatted using one of the recognised Harvard styles. You are welcome to use the Harvard style Emerald has adopted – we’ve provided a detailed guide below. Want to use a different Harvard style? That’s fine, our typesetters will make any necessary changes to your manuscript if it is accepted. Please ensure you check all your citations for completeness, accuracy and consistency.

References to other publications in your text should be written as follows:

, 2006) Please note, ‘ ' should always be written in italics.

A few other style points. These apply to both the main body of text and your final list of references.

At the end of your paper, please supply a reference list in alphabetical order using the style guidelines below. Where a DOI is available, this should be included at the end of the reference.

Surname, initials (year),  , publisher, place of publication.

e.g. Harrow, R. (2005),  , Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.

Surname, initials (year), "chapter title", editor's surname, initials (Ed.), , publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), "The early pathways: theory to practice – a continuum", Stankosky, M. (Ed.),  , Elsevier, New York, NY, pp.15-20.

Surname, initials (year), "title of article",  , volume issue, page numbers.

e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), "Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century",  , Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.72-80.

Surname, initials (year of publication), "title of paper", in editor’s surname, initials (Ed.),  , publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Wilde, S. and Cox, C. (2008), “Principal factors contributing to the competitiveness of tourism destinations at varying stages of development”, in Richardson, S., Fredline, L., Patiar A., & Ternel, M. (Ed.s),  , Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, pp.115-118.

Surname, initials (year), "title of paper", paper presented at [name of conference], [date of conference], [place of conference], available at: URL if freely available on the internet (accessed date).

e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), "Semantic authoring and retrieval within a wiki", paper presented at the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1 June, Heraklion, Crete, available at: http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/aumueller05wiksar.pdf (accessed 20 February 2007).

Surname, initials (year), "title of article", working paper [number if available], institution or organization, place of organization, date.

e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), "How published academic research can inform policy decisions: the case of mandatory rotation of audit appointments", working paper, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.

 (year), "title of entry", volume, edition, title of encyclopaedia, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g.   (1926), "Psychology of culture contact", Vol. 1, 13th ed., Encyclopaedia Britannica, London and New York, NY, pp.765-771.

(for authored entries, please refer to book chapter guidelines above)

Surname, initials (year), "article title",  , date, page numbers.

e.g. Smith, A. (2008), "Money for old rope",  , 21 January, pp.1, 3-4.

 (year), "article title", date, page numbers.

e.g.   (2008), "Small change", 2 February, p.7.

Surname, initials (year), "title of document", unpublished manuscript, collection name, inventory record, name of archive, location of archive.

e.g. Litman, S. (1902), "Mechanism & Technique of Commerce", unpublished manuscript, Simon Litman Papers, Record series 9/5/29 Box 3, University of Illinois Archives, Urbana-Champaign, IL.

If available online, the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference, as well as the date that the resource was accessed.

Surname, initials (year), “title of electronic source”, available at: persistent URL (accessed date month year).

e.g. Weida, S. and Stolley, K. (2013), “Developing strong thesis statements”, available at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/1/ (accessed 20 June 2018)

Standalone URLs, i.e. those without an author or date, should be included either inside parentheses within the main text, or preferably set as a note (Roman numeral within square brackets within text followed by the full URL address at the end of the paper).

Surname, initials (year),  , name of data repository, available at: persistent URL, (accessed date month year).

e.g. Campbell, A. and Kahn, R.L. (2015),  , ICPSR07218-v4, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI, available at: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07218.v4 (accessed 20 June 2018)

Submit your manuscript

There are a number of key steps you should follow to ensure a smooth and trouble-free submission.

Double check your manuscript

Before submitting your work, it is your responsibility to check that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct, and without spelling or typographical errors. A few other important points:

  • Give the journal aims and scope a final read. Is your manuscript definitely a good fit? If it isn’t, the editor may decline it without peer review.
  • Does your manuscript comply with our research and publishing ethics guidelines ?
  • Have you cleared any necessary publishing permissions ?
  • Have you followed all the formatting requirements laid out in these author guidelines?
  • If you need to refer to your own work, use wording such as ‘previous research has demonstrated’ not ‘our previous research has demonstrated’.
  • If you need to refer to your own, currently unpublished work, don’t include this work in the reference list.
  • Any acknowledgments or author biographies should be uploaded as separate files.
  • Carry out a final check to ensure that no author names appear anywhere in the manuscript. This includes in figures or captions.

You will find a helpful submission checklist on the website Think.Check.Submit .

The submission process

All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial system by the corresponding author.

The only way to submit to the journal is through the journal’s ScholarOne site as accessed via the Emerald website, and not by email or through any third-party agent/company, journal representative, or website. Submissions should be done directly by the author(s) through the ScholarOne site and not via a third-party proxy on their behalf.

A separate author account is required for each journal you submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this journal, please choose the Create an account or Register now option in the editorial system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to reuse the existing username and password here.

Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be asked for your username. This will be the email address you entered when you set up your account.

Don't forget to add your  ORCiD ID during the submission process. It will be embedded in your published article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others to easily match you with your work.

Don’t have one yet? It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD identifier .

Visit the ScholarOne support centre  for further help and guidance.

What you can expect next

You will receive an automated email from the journal editor, confirming your successful submission. It will provide you with a manuscript number, which will be used in all future correspondence about your submission. If you have any reason to suspect the confirmation email you receive might be fraudulent, please contact the journal editor in the first instance.

Post submission

Review and decision process.

Each submission is checked by the editor. At this stage, they may choose to decline or unsubmit your manuscript if it doesn’t fit the journal aims and scope, or they feel the language/manuscript quality is too low.

If they think it might be suitable for the publication, they will send it to at least two independent referees for double anonymous peer review.  Once these reviewers have provided their feedback, the editor may decide to accept your manuscript, request minor or major revisions, or decline your work.

While all journals work to different timescales, the goal is that the editor will inform you of their first decision within 60 days.

During this period, we will send you automated updates on the progress of your manuscript via our submission system, or you can log in to check on the current status of your paper.  Each time we contact you, we will quote the manuscript number you were given at the point of submission. If you receive an email that does not match these criteria, it could be fraudulent and we recommend you contact the journal editor in the first instance.

Manuscript transfer service

Emerald’s manuscript transfer service takes the pain out of the submission process if your manuscript doesn’t fit your initial journal choice. Our team of expert Editors from participating journals work together to identify alternative journals that better align with your research, ensuring your work finds the ideal publication home it deserves. Our dedicated team is committed to supporting authors like you in finding the right home for your research.

If a journal is participating in the manuscript transfer program, the Editor has the option to recommend your paper for transfer. If a transfer decision is made by the Editor, you will receive an email with the details of the recommended journal and the option to accept or reject the transfer. It’s always down to you as the author to decide if you’d like to accept. If you do accept, your paper and any reviewer reports will automatically be transferred to the recommended journals. Authors will then confirm resubmissions in the new journal’s ScholarOne system.

Our Manuscript Transfer Service page has more information on the process.

If your submission is accepted

Open access.

Once your paper is accepted, you will have the opportunity to indicate whether you would like to publish your paper via the gold open access route.

If you’ve chosen to publish gold open access, this is the point you will be asked to pay the APC (article processing charge).  This varies per journal and can be found on our APC price list or on the editorial system at the point of submission. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence , which outlines how readers can reuse your work.

For UK journal article authors - if you wish to submit your work accepted by Emerald to REF 2021, you must make a ‘closed deposit’ of your accepted manuscript to your respective institutional repository upon acceptance of your article. Articles accepted for publication after 1st April 2018 should be deposited as soon as possible, but no later than three months after the acceptance date. For further information and guidance, please refer to the REF 2021 website.

All accepted authors are sent an email with a link to a licence form.  This should be checked for accuracy, for example whether contact and affiliation details are up to date and your name is spelled correctly, and then returned to us electronically. If there is a reason why you can’t assign copyright to us, you should discuss this with your journal content editor. You will find their contact details on the editorial team section above.

Proofing and typesetting

Once we have received your completed licence form, the article will pass directly into the production process. We will carry out editorial checks, copyediting, and typesetting and then return proofs to you (if you are the corresponding author) for your review. This is your opportunity to correct any typographical errors, grammatical errors or incorrect author details. We can’t accept requests to rewrite texts at this stage.

When the page proofs are finalised, the fully typeset and proofed version of record is published online. This is referred to as the EarlyCite version. While an EarlyCite article has yet to be assigned to a volume or issue, it does have a digital object identifier (DOI) and is fully citable. It will be compiled into an issue according to the journal’s issue schedule, with papers being added by chronological date of publication.

How to share your paper

Visit our author rights page  to find out how you can reuse and share your work.

To find tips on increasing the visibility of your published paper, read about  how to promote your work .

Correcting inaccuracies in your published paper

Sometimes errors are made during the research, writing and publishing processes. When these issues arise, we have the option of withdrawing the paper or introducing a correction notice. Find out more about our  article withdrawal and correction policies .

Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently asked questions (FAQs) below.

Frequently asked questions

The only time we will ever ask you for money to publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to publish via the gold open access route. You will be asked to pay an APC (article-processing charge) once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a sponsored open access journal), and never at submission.

At no other time will you be asked to contribute financially towards your article’s publication, processing, or review. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email that appears to be from Emerald, the journal, or a third party, asking you for payment to publish, please contact our support team via .

Please contact the editor for the journal, with a copy of your CV. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page.

Typically, papers are added to an issue according to their date of publication. If you would like to know in advance which issue your paper will appear in, please contact the content editor of the journal. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. Once your paper has been published in an issue, you will be notified by email.

Please email the journal editor – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. If you ever suspect an email you’ve received from Emerald might not be genuine, you are welcome to verify it with the content editor for the journal, whose contact details can be found on the editorial team tab on this page.

If you’ve read the aims and scope on the journal landing page and are still unsure whether your paper is suitable for the journal, please email the editor and include your paper's title and structured abstract. They will be able to advise on your manuscript’s suitability. You will find their contact details on the Editorial team tab on this page.

Authorship and the order in which the authors are listed on the paper should be agreed prior to submission. We have a right first time policy on this and no changes can be made to the list once submitted. If you have made an error in the submission process, please email the Journal Editorial Office who will look into your request – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page.

  • David Loseby Leeds University Business School - UK [email protected]

Founding Editor

  • Khi V Thai Florida Atlantic University, USA

Associate Editor

  • Gian Luigi Albano Consip Spa and University LUISS "G. Carli" - Italy
  • Barbara Allen Victoria University of Wellington - New Zealand
  • Malin Arve NHH Norwegian School of Economics - Norway
  • Chris Atkinson Ph.D. University of West Florida - USA
  • Michael Essig Bundeswehr University Munich - Germany
  • Anthony Flynn Cardiff Business School - UK
  • Jolien Grandia Erasmus University Rotterdam - Netherlands
  • Patricia Guarnieri dos Santos University of Brasilia - Brazil
  • Kirsi-Maria Halonen University of Lapland - Finland
  • Sofia Lundberg Umeå School of Business - Sweden
  • Ola Lædre Norwegian University of Science and Technology - Norway
  • Richard Oloruntoba Curtin University - Australia

Commissioning Editor

  • Ciara Boardman Emerald Publishing - UK [email protected]

Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance)

  • Vivek Dubey Emerald Publishing [email protected]

Supplier Project Manager (For queries related to post-acceptance)

  • Shalu Pandey Emerald Publishing [email protected]

Editorial Advisory Board

  • Andrea Appolloni University of Rome Tor Vergata - Italy
  • Kelly Barner Art of Procurement - USA
  • Andrew Fearne University of East Anglia - UK
  • Andrea Genovese University of Sheffield - UK
  • Andreas H. Glas Universität der Bundeswehr München - Germany
  • Stephen Gordon Old Dominion University - USA
  • Paul Joesbury The Procurement Doctor - UK
  • Katri Kauppi Aalto University - Finland
  • Louise Knight Twente University - Netherlands
  • Jane Lynch Cardiff University - UK
  • Donna Marshall University College Dublin - Ireland
  • Lawrence Martin University of Central Florida - USA
  • Cliff McCue Florida Atlantic University - USA
  • Eric Prier Florida Atlantic University - USA
  • Rene Rendon Naval Postgraduate School - USA
  • Stéphane Saussier Universite Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne - France
  • Klaas Stek University of Twente - The Netherlands
  • Tunde Tatrai Corvinus University of Budapest - Hungary
  • Frederik Vos Portland State University - USA
  • Remko van Hoek University of Arkansas, Sam M. Walton College of Business - USA

CiteScore 2023

Further information

CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.

Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same four years.

For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition

CiteScore Tracker 2024

(updated monthly)

CiteScore Tracker is calculated in the same way as CiteScore, but for the current year rather than previous, complete years.

The CiteScore Tracker calculation is updated every month, as a current indication of a title's performance.

2022 Impact Factor

The Journal Impact Factor is published each year by Clarivate Analytics. It is a measure of the number of times an average paper in a particular journal is cited during the preceding two years.

For more information and methodology see Clarivate Analytics

5-year Impact Factor (2022)

A base of five years may be more appropriate for journals in certain fields because the body of citations may not be large enough to make reasonable comparisons, or it may take longer than two years to publish and distribute leading to a longer period before others cite the work.

Actual value is intentionally only displayed for the most recent year. Earlier values are available in the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics .

Time to first decision

Time to first decision , expressed in days, the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Based on this feedback, they decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.

Data is taken from submissions between 1st January 2024 and 30th April 2024

Acceptance rate

The acceptance rate is a measurement of how many manuscripts a journal accepts for publication compared to the total number of manuscripts submitted expressed as a percentage %

Data is taken from submissions between 1st January 2024 and 30th April 2024.

This journal is abstracted and indexed by   

  • Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA)
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics)

Reviewer information

Peer review process.

This journal engages in a double-anonymous peer review process, which strives to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.

Our vision is to give voice to professionals in the subject area who contribute unique and diverse scholarly perspectives to the field.

The journal values diverse perspectives from the field and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to authors. Reviewers come from a variety of organizations, careers, and backgrounds from around the world.

All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.

procurement research papers

Resources to guide you through the review process

Discover practical tips and guidance on all aspects of peer review in our reviewers' section. See how being a reviewer could benefit your career, and discover what's involved in shaping a review.

More reviewer information

Thank you to the 2022 Reviewers of the Journal of Public Procurement

The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2022 reviewers for this journal. We are very grateful for the contributions made. With their help, the journal has been able to publish such high...

Call for Papers - Journal of Public Procurement

Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) is welcoming the submission of papers. The Journal of Public Procurement is multi-disciplinary and employs a broad approach towards methods and styles of research. Public p...

Thank you to the 2021 Reviewers of Journal of Public Procurement

The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2021 reviewers for this journal. We are very grateful for the contributions made. With their help, the journal has ...

Literati awards

procurement research papers

Journal of Public Procurement - Literati Award Winners 2022 

We are pleased to announce our 2022 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Gender-responsive public proc...

procurement research papers

Journal of Public Procurement - Literati Award Winners 2020

We are pleased to announce our 2020 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper State public-private partnership (P3) legislation and ...

The Journal of Public Procurement covers all aspects of public procurement at a local, regional, national and international level. Multi-disciplinary, the journal examines public procurement from the perspectives of management, law, economics and politics.

Signatory of DORA logo

Aims and scope

The Journal of Public Procurement positions itself as the leading academic journal providing high quality research with impact in the area of public procurement (PP). We particularly encourage research that embraces an interdisciplinary approach that more closely recognises the interconnection between public procurement and the private sector activities of sourcing and supply. Thereby being salient and pertinent to practitioners, institutions, policy development/shaping as well as contributing to the academic knowledge in this field. Furthermore, we are open to exploration of “arm’s length public bodies” that are indirectly or directly connected with mainstream public sector regulation and authority/administration. 

The Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) is multi-disciplinary and employs a broad approach towards methods and styles of research. Public procurement refers to examining the sourcing and purchase of goods, services and works by public organisations, being national or local governments.  

Further, we acknowledge that: 

Procurement is more than the purchase of goods and services, and recognises the management of external resources in a wider sense. As a result, the Journal publishes research in all aspects of the interconnection between public buying and private sector sourcing and supplying including the supply chain as a whole and hybrid formats like public private partnerships. 

Public not as a specific institutional role (state in a wider or closer sense, NGOs etc.), but more a functional understanding of contributing to a public task. This includes exploration of “arm’s length public bodies” that are indirectly or directly connected with mainstream public sector regulation and authority/administration. 

The coverage of the journal includes topics such as procurement policy, sustainable and responsible public procurement, social impact bonds, concession contracts, public-private partnerships, procurement strategic planning and scheduling, contract award methods, contract management, renegotiation, corruption, transparency and accountability issues, performance evaluation, innovation, social value, green procurement, circular economy, procurement methods and techniques, suppliers’ relations, organizational design, human resource management, public procurement and relational contracting, behavioural and social attributes as well as more substantive areas such as laws and regulations, procurement economics and politics, and procurement ethics. 

Within that understanding, we have neither a specific methodological nor a specific disciplinary focus. High quality research from economics, management, law, political sciences and other disciplines is welcome. We particularly encourage research that embraces an interdisciplinary approach that more closely connects with the practical context. We are keen to witness robust and thorough methodological approaches and standards as well as novel approaches that allow the exploration of novel approaches and concepts. 

Latest articles

These are the latest articles published in this journal (Last updated: May 2024)

Boundary Spanners as a Key to Value Creation in Infrastructure Procurement

Streamlining professionalisation in public procurement: romanian competency frameworks as a case study (part b), streamlining professionalisation in public procurement: romanian competency frameworks as a case study (part a), top downloaded articles.

These are the most downloaded articles over the last 12 months for this journal (Last updated: May 2024)

Exploring the role of social capital in public procurement

The perks of being an attractive public customer, dynamic capabilities view on value creation in public procurement.

These are the top cited articles for this journal, from the last 12 months according to Crossref (Last updated: May 2024)

Adoption intentions of electronic procurement among public sector organisations (PSOs) in Ghana: emerging economy perspective

Do internet marketing capabilities interact with the effect of procedural capabilities for public procurement participation on smes' sales performance, how to increase the uptake of circular public procurement lessons learned from local authorities in sweden, related journals.

This journal is part of our Public policy & environmental management collection. Explore our Public policy & environmental management subject area to find out more.  

See all related journals

Journal of Enterprise Information Management

Journal of Enterprise Information Management publishes high quality articles of significant intellectual interest and...

procurement research papers

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management publishes a broad coverage of original research relating to the...

procurement research papers

Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management

Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management provides a platform for academic researchers, professionals...

procurement research papers

This journal is aligned with our responsible management goal

We aim to champion researchers, practitioners, policymakers and organisations who share our goals of contributing to a more ethical, responsible and sustainable way of working.

SDG 8 Decent work & economic growth

Advertisement

Advertisement

Sustainable Procurement Practice: The Effect of Procurement Officers’ Perceptions

  • Original Paper
  • Published: 31 May 2022
  • Volume 184 , pages 525–548, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

procurement research papers

  • Daniel Etse   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-6327 1 ,
  • Adela McMurray 2 &
  • Nuttawuth Muenjohn 3  

2481 Accesses

4 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Effective implementation and committed practice of sustainable procurement remain a significant challenge for many organisations across the globe. This paper sought to understand the extent to which employees’ perceptions influence the practice of sustainable procurement in the context of a developing country where sustainability awareness is low. Drawing on the Diffusion of Innovation theory, procurement officers’ perceptions of sustainable procurement were examined relative to the attributes of complexity, compatibility and relative advantage. Empirical data from 322 Ghanaian organisations were analysed using descriptive statistics and structural equation modelling to determine the nature of procurement officers’ perceptions of sustainable procurement and the effects of the perceptions on relevant organisational practices. The findings indicate that whereas perceptions of relative advantage did not significantly influence the practice of sustainable procurement, perceptions of compatibility had a significant positive effect, and perceptions of complexity had a significant negative effect on sustainable procurement. This study offers insights into the link between employees’ perceptions and organisational sustainable procurement practice, thereby providing a conceptual basis for effective management of the pertinent relationships with implications for enhanced ethical practices in procurement and supply chain management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

procurement research papers

Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda

procurement research papers

Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation

procurement research papers

A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability

Adjei-Bamfo, P., & Maloreh-Nyamekye, T. (2019). The “baby steps” in mainstreaming sustainable public procurement in Ghana: A “double-agency” perspective. Journal of Public Affairs, 19 , e1902.

Article   Google Scholar  

Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2003). Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: Correlates of perceived innovation attributes. Information Technology for Development, 10 (1), 57–69.

Allen, S., Cunliffe, A. L., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2017). Understanding sustainability through the lens of ecocentric radical-reflexivity: Implications for management education. Journal of Business Ethics, 154 (3), 781–795.

Amabile, T. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organisations. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviour (pp. 123–167). Greenwich JAI Press.

Google Scholar  

Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108 (1), 61–79.

Amstrong, J., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 , 396–402.

Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017). A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142 , 2524–2543.

Appolloni, A., Sun, H., Jia, F., & Li, X. (2014). Green Procurement in the private sector: A state of the art review between 1996 and 2013. Journal of Cleaner Production , 85 , 122–33.

Azmat, F., & Samaratunge, R. (2009). Responsible entrepreneurship in developing countries: Understanding the realities and complexities. Journal of Business Ethics, 90 (3), 437–452.

Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74–94.

Bartlett, J., Kortrlik, J., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology Learning and Performance Journal, 19 , 43–50.

Beran, T. N., & Violato, C. (2010). Structural equation modeling in medical research: A primer. BMC Research Notes, 3 (1), 267.

Berberoglu, A. (2018). Impact of organizational climate on organizational commitment and perceived organizational performance: Empirical evidence from public hospitals. BMC Health Services Research, 18 (1), 399.

Berlan, A. (2013). Social sustainability in agriculture: An anthropological perspective on child labour in cocoa production in Ghana. The Journal of Development Studies, 49 (8), 1088–1100.

Blackman, A., & Rivera, J. (2011). Producer-level benefits of sustainability certification. Conservation Biology, 25 (6), 1176–1185.

Blome, C., & Paulraj, A. (2013). Ethical climate and purchasing social responsibility: A benevolence focus. Journal of Business Ethics, 116 (3), 567–585.

Boadi, S., Nsor, C. A., Antobre, O. O., & Acquah, E. (2016). An analysis of illegal mining on the Offin shelterbelt forest reserve, Ghana: Implications on community livelihood. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 15 (3), 115–119.

Bos, B., Drupp, M. A., Meya, J. N., & Quaas, M. F. (2020). Moral suasion and the private provision of public goods: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76 (4), 1117–1138.

Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: An international comparative study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31 (4), 452–476.

Brierley, S. (2020). Unprincipled principals: Co-opted bureaucrats and corruption in Ghana. American Journal of Political Science, 64 (2), 209–222.

Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research . The Guilford Press.

Burritt, R. L., Christ, K. L., Rammal, H. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). Multinational enterprise strategies for addressing sustainability: The need for consolidation. Journal of Business Ethics, 164 (2), 389–410.

Cantor, D. E., Morrow, P. C., & Montabon, F. (2012). Engagement in environmental behaviors among supply chain management employees: An organizational support theoretical perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48 (3), 33–51.

Caprar, D. V., & Neville, B. A. (2012). “Norming” and “conforming”: Integrating cultural and institutional explanations for sustainability adoption in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 110 (2), 231–245.

Carbone, V., Moatti, V., & Wood, C. H. (2012). Diffusion of sustainable supply chain management: Toward a conceptual framework. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 13 (4), 26–39.

Carter, R. (2005). Purchasing social responsibility and firm performance: The key mediating roles of organizational learning and supplier performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35 (3), 177–194.

Carter, R., & Jennings, M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25 (1), 145–186.

Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2), 178–184.

Chen, Y., & Chen, I. J. (2019). Mixed sustainability motives, mixed results: The role of compliance and commitment in sustainable supply chain practices. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24 (5), 622–636.

Cheng, W., Appolloni, A., D’Amato, A., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Green public procurement, missing concepts and future trends: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176 , 770–784.

Chkanikova, O. (2016). Sustainable purchasing in food retailing: interorganizational relationship management to green product supply. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25 (7), 478–494.

Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119 (2), 166.

Craighead, C., Ketchen, D., Jr., Dunn, K., & Hult, T. (2011). Addressing common method variance: Guidelines for survey research on information technology, operations, and supply chian management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58 (3), 578–588.

Crespin-Mazet, F., & Dontenwill, E. (2012). Sustainable procurement: Building legitimacy in the supply network. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18 (4), 207–217.

Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19 (3), 495–522.

De Lange, W., Wise, R., & Nahman, A. (2010). Securing a sustainable future through a new global contract between rich and poor. Sustainable Development, 18 , 374–384.

Dearing, J. W. (2009). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19 (5), 503–518.

Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles and practice. Health Affairs, 37 (2), 183–190.

Delmonico, D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Pereira, S. C. F., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Renwick, D. W. S., & Thomé, A. M. T. (2018). Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: Evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134 , 70–79.

Dupuis, M., Khadeer, S., & Huang, J. (2017). “I Got the Job!”: An exploratory study examining the psychological factors related to status updates on facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 73 , 132–140.

Eberhardt-Toth, E., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2013). A cognitive elaboration model of sustainability decision making: investigating financial managers’ orientation toward environmental issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 117 (4), 735–751.

Egan, G. (1990). The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping . Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Etse, D., McMurray, A., & Muenjohn, N. (2022). The effect of regulation on sustainable procurement: Organisational leadership and culture as mediators. Journal of Business Ethics , 177 , 305–325.

Fan, Y., Chen, J., Shirkey, G., John, R., Wu, S. R., Park, H., & Shao, C. (2016). Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: An updated review. Ecological Processes, 5 , 1.

Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (1), 33–39.

Ferri, L. M., Oelze, N., Habisch, A., & Molteni, M. (2016). Implementation of responsible Procurement Management: An institutional perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25 (4), 261–276.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.

Frambach, R., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organisational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55 , 163–176.

French, J. (2010). Children’s Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 92 (1), 63–78.

Ghana Statistical Service. (2015). ’Integrated business establishment survey. In A. Amuzu & D. Kombat (Eds.), National Employment Report. Ghana Statistical Service: Accra.

Ginty, A. T. (2013). Construct validity. In M. D. Gellman & J. R. Turner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine (pp. 487–587). Springer.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Goebel, P., Reuter, C., Pibernik, R., & Sichtmann, C. (2012). The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 7–17.

Gormly, J. (2014). What are the challenges to sustainable procurement in commercial semi-state bodies in Ireland? Journal of Public Procurement, 14 (3), 395–445.

Grandia, J. (2016). Finding the missing link: Examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124 , 183–190.

Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2014). Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127 (2), 297–316.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis . Pearson.

Harms, D., Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2013). Strategies in sustainable supply chain management: An empirical investigation of large german companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20 (4), 205–218.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115–135.

Hilson, G. (2002). The environmental impact of small-scale gold mining in Ghana: Identifying problems and possible solutions. The Geographical Journal, 168 (1), 57–72.

Hilson, G. (2010). Child labour in African Artisanal mining communities: Experiences from Northern Ghana. Development and Change, 41 (3), 445–473.

Hoejmose, S. U., Roehrich, J. K., & Grosvold, J. (2014). Is doing more doing better? The relationship between responsible supply chain management and corporate reputation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43 (1), 77–90.

Hollos, D., Blome, C., & Foerstl, K. (2012). Does sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance? Examining implications for the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Research, 50 (11), 2968–2986.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6 (1), 53–60.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55.

Huq, F., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Implementing socially sustainable practices in challenging institutional contexts: Building theory from seven developing country supplier cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 161 (2), 415–442.

Huq, F., Stevenon, M., & Zorzini, M. (2014). Social sustainability in developing country suppliers: An exploratory study in the ready made garment industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34 (5), 610–638.

Iivonen, K. (2017). Defensive responses to strategic sustainability paradoxes: Have your coke and drink it too! Journal of Business Ethics, 148 (2), 309–327.

ILO. (2020). National labour law profile . ILO.

Islam, M. M., Murad, M. W., McMurray, A., & Abalala, T. S. (2017). Aspects of sustainable procurement practices by public and private organisations in Saudi Arabia: An empirical study. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24 (4), 289–303.

Jo, M.-S. (2000). Controlling social-desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirect questioning in structural equation models. Psychology & Marketing, 17 (2), 137–148.

Johnsen, T. E., Miemczyk, J., & Howard, M. (2017). A systematic literature review of sustainable purchasing and supply research: Theoretical perspectives and opportunities for IMP-based research. Industrial Marketing Management, 61 , 130–143.

Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy . Pearson Education Limited.

Joseph, J., Borland, H., Orlitzky, M., & Lindgreen, A. (2018). Seeing versus doing: How businesses manage tensions in pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 164 (2), 349–370.

Katiyar, R., Meena, P. L., Barua, M. K., Tibrewala, R., & Kumar, G. (2018). Impact of sustainability and manufacturing practices on supply chain performance: Findings from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 197 , 303–316.

Kenny, D. (2015). Measuring model fit.

Khojastehpour, M., & Jamali, D. (2021). Institutional complexity of host country and corporate social responsibility: Developing vs developed countries. Social Responsibility Journal, 17 (5), 593–612.

Kidwell, B., Farmer, A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013). Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 350–367.

Kim, S., Colicchia, C., & Menachof, D. (2018). Ethical Sourcing: An Analysis of the Literature and Implications for Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 152 (4), 1033–1052.

Kim, T. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 68 (6), 540–546.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Larson, B. (2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61 (5), 534–547.

Lee, S. (2008). Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13 (3), 185–198.

Lin, C.-Y., Alam, S. S., Ho, Y.-H., Al-Shaikh, M. E., & Sultan, P. (2020). Adoption of green supply chain management among SMEs in Malaysia. Sustainability, 12 (16), 6454.

Lin, Y., & Ho, H. (2011). Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 98 (1), 67–83.

Lindsay, P., & Norman, D. (1977). Human information processing: an introduction to psychology . California Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.

Liu, J., Liu, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Uncovering the influence mechanism between top management support and green procurement: The effect of green training. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251 , 119674.

Mani, V., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Four forces of supply chain social sustainability adoption in emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics, 199 , 150–161.

Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., Claudy, M., & McGrath, P. (2019). Piggy in the middle: How direct customer power affects first-tier suppliers’ adoption of socially responsible procurement practices and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154 (4), 1081–1102.

Marusteri, M., & Bacarea, V. (2010). Comparing groups for statistical differences: How to choose the right statistical test? Biochemia Medica, 20 (1), 15–32.

Masa’deh, R. E., Alananzeh, O., Algiatheen, N., Ryati, R., Albayyari, R., & Tarhini, A. (2017). The impact of employee’s perception of implementing green supply chain management on hotel’s economic and operational performance. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 8 (3), 395–416.

McDonald, S. (2011). Perception: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 23 (1), 2–9.

McHugh, M., & Hudson-Barr, D. (2003). Descriptive statistics, Part II: Most commonly used descriptive statistics. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 8 (3), 111–116.

McMurray, A., Islam, M. M., Siwar, C., & Fien, J. (2014). Sustainable procurement in Malaysian organizations: Practices, barriers and opportunities. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20 (3), 195–207.

Meehan, J., & Bryde, D. (2011). Sustainable procurement practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20 (2), 94–106.

Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22 (1), 67–72.

Montabon, F., Daugherty, P., & Chen, H. (2018). Setting standards for single respondent survey design. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54 (1), 35–41.

Morali, O., & Searcy, C. (2013). A review of sustainable supply chain management practices in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 117 (3), 635–658.

Murcia, M. J., Panwar, R. & Tarzijan, J. (2020). Socially responsible firms outsource less. Business & Society , 000765031989849.

Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2015). Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology, 142 (2), 71–89.

Oelze, N., Hoejmose, S., Habisch, A., & Millington, A. (2016). Sustainable development in supply chain management: The role of organizational learning for policy implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25 , 241–260.

Pellegrini, C., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2018). The role of sustainable human resource practices in influencing employee behavior for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27 (8), 1221–1232.

Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98 (1), 194–198.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.

Powell, B., & Zwolinski, M. (2012). The ethical and economic case against sweatshop labor: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 107 (4), 449–472.

PPA Ghana. (2017). Implementing sustainable public procurement (SPP) under Public Procurement Amendment Act. 2016 (Act 914), 8:3. Retrieved from https://capturetribe.com/theppa/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/20170506-PPA-E-Bulletin-May-Jun-2017.pdf .

Pullman, M., Maloni, M., & Carter, R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (4), 38–54.

Rabl, T., del Carmen Triana, M., Byun, S.-Y., & Bosch, L. (2020). Diversity management efforts as an ethical responsibility: How employees’ perceptions of an organizational integration and learning approach to diversity affect employee behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 161 (3), 531–550.

Reilly, T., Saini, A., & Skiba, J. (2020). Ethical purchasing dissonance: Antecedents and coping behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 163 (3), 577–597.

Rogers, E. (2002). Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addictive Behaviors, 27 , 989–993.

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovation . Free Press.

Roman, A. V. (2017). Institutionalizing sustainability: A structural equation model of sustainable procurement in US public agencies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143 , 1048–1059.

Saaksjarvi, M. (2003). Consumer adoption of technological innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6 (2), 90–100.

Sajjad, A., Eweje, G., & Tappin, D. (2020). Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: Evidence from New Zealand. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29 (2), 592–604.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Business Cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. Journal of Business Ethics, 147 (2), 241–259.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building appraoch . Wiley.

Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15), 1699–1710.

Siegel, S. (2016). The contents of perception. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University.

Silvestre, B. S. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167 , 156–169.

Simpson, M., Taylor, N., & Barker, K. (2004). Environmental responsibility in SMEs: Does it deliver competitive advantage? Business Strategy and the Environment, 13 (3), 156–171.

Svensson, G., Wood, G., & Callaghan, M. (2010). A corporate model of sustainable business practices: An ethical perspective. Journal of World Business, 45 (4), 336–345.

Tafoya, M. (2018). Mean, arithmetic. In M. Allen (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods. Sage Publications Inc.

Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Procedural steps in structural equation modelling. In J. J. Thakkar (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Application for research and practice (with AMOS and R) (pp. 29–34). Singapore: Springer.

Tornatzky, L., & Klein, K. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29 (1), 28–45.

UNEP. (2013). Sustainable public procurement: A global review . UNEP.

van de Mortel, T. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25 (4), 40–48.

Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28 (1), 54–79.

Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14 (2), 128–137.

Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2012). The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 256–268.

Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14 (1), 69–85.

Walker, H., & Jones, N. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management across the UK private sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (1), 15–28.

Walker, H., Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T., & Spencer, R. (2012). Sustainable procurement: Past, present and future. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18 (4), 201–206.

Wilkinson, A., Hill, M., & Gollan, P. (2001). The sustainability debate. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21 (12), 1492–1502.

Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119 (3), 317–328.

Zaidi, S. A. H., Mirza, F. M., Hou, F., & Ashraf, R. U. (2019). 'Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: What factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan?' Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, In Press.

Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., Nikbin, D., & Jumadi, H. B. (2014). Determinants and environmental outcome of green technology innovation adoption in the transportation industry in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22 (2), 286–301.

Zhang, Y. (2021). Greasing dirty machines: Evidence of pollution-driven bribery in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 170 (1), 53–74.

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-H. (2012). Internationalization and environmentally-related organizational learning among Chinese manufacturers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (1), 142–154.

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-H. (2018). Regulatory policy awareness and environmental supply chain cooperation in China: A regulatory-exchange-theoretic perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65 (1), 46–58.

Zorzini, M., Hendry, L. C., Huq, F. A., & Stevenson, M. (2015). Socially responsible sourcing: Reviewing the literature and its use of theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35 (1), 60–109.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Kumasi Technical University, Kumasi, Ghana

Daniel Etse

College of Business, Government & Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

Adela McMurray

RMIT University College of Business, Melbourne, Australia

Nuttawuth Muenjohn

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Etse .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

There is no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

We have complied with Ethical Standards

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Research Instrument

1 Sustainable Procurement Scale

Our organisation ensures suppliers operational sites are operated in a safe manner.

Our organisation visits suppliers’ operational site to ensure that the work environment is conducive.

Our organisation ensures inbound, internal and outbound logistics at its operational sites are done in a safe manner.

Environment

Our organisation commits its suppliers to waste reduction goals.

Our organisation evaluates whole life environmental friendliness of products before procuring.

Our organisation practices reduce, reuse and recycle.

Our organisation is committed to reduced use of packaging materials.

Our organisation participates in the design of products for disassembly.

Philanthropy

Our organisation donates to communities in which it operates.

Our organisation donates to philanthropic organisations.

Our organisation volunteers at local charities.

Our organisation has a policy on buying from minority and women based enterprises.

Our organisation buys from minority and women based enterprises.

Human Rights

Our organisation ensures its suppliers are not using child labour.

Our organisation asks its suppliers to pay employees a living wage.

Our organisation visits suppliers’ sites to ensure sweatshop labour is not being used.

2 SP Perceptions Scale

Perceptions of Complexity

Sustainable procurement is difficult to understand.

Sustainable procurement is difficult to practice.

Sustainable procurement is difficult to explain to others.

It is difficult to acquire relevant experiences for sustainable procurement practice.

Perceptions of Compatibility

Sustainable procurement is consistent with our organisational values.

Integrating sustainable procurement into our organisational system is easy.

Sustainable procurement practice is consistent with our existing operations.

Perceptions of Relative Advantage

Sustainable procurement practice will enhance our organisation’s reputation.

Sustainable procurement practice will enhance our international business potentials.

Sustainable procurement practice will save our organisation from sanctions.

Sustainable procurement will improve our organisation’s environmental performance.

Sustainable procurement practice will enhance our organisation’s economic performance

Appendix 2: Paired samples test

 

Paired differences

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

SD

Std. error Mean

95% Confidence interval of the difference

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

Sustainable procurement is easy to understand—Sustainable procurement is easy to practice

0.27950

0.86620

0.04827

0.18454

0.37447

5.790

321

0.000

Pair 2

Sustainable procurement is easy to understand—Sustainable procurement is easy to explain to others

0.10248

0.86759

0.04835

0.00736

0.19760

2.120

321

0.035

Pair 3

Sustainable procurement is easy to understand—It is easy to acquire relevant experience for sustainable procurement practice

0.70807

1.19782

0.06675

0.57675

0.83940

10.608

321

0.000

Pair 4

Sustainable procurement is easy to practice—Sustainable procurement is easy to explain to others

− 0.17702

0.91527

0.05101

− 0.27737

− 0.07667

− 3.471

321

0.001

Pair 5

Sustainable procurement is easy to practice—It is easy to acquire relevant experience for sustainable procurement practice

0.42857

1.26153

0.07030

0.29026

0.56688

6.096

321

0.000

Pair 6

Sustainable procurement is easy to explain to others—It is easy to acquire relevant experience for sustainable procurement practice

0.60559

1.15593

0.06442

0.47886

0.73232

9.401

321

0.000

Pair 7

Sustainable procurement is consistent with our organisational values—Integrating sustainable procurement into our organisational system is easy

0.27329

1.03212

0.05752

0.16013

0.38645

4.751

321

0.000

Pair 8

Sustainable procurement is consistent with our organisational values—Sustainable procurement practice is compatible with our existing operations

0.15528

0.98309

0.05479

0.04750

0.26306

2.834

321

0.005

Pair 9

Integrating sustainable procurement into our organisational system is easy—Sustainable procurement practice is compatible with our existing operations

− 0.11801

0.85656

0.04773

− 0.21192

− 0.02410

− 2.472

321

0.014

Pair 10

Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation’s reputation—Sustainable procurement practice will enhance our potential for international business

0.14907

0.74224

0.04136

0.06769

0.23045

3.604

321

0.000

Pair 11

Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation’s reputation—Sustainable procurement will help our organisation avoid sanctions

0.20186

0.82386

0.04591

0.11154

0.29219

4.397

321

0.000

Pair 12

Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation’s reputation—Sustainable procurement will improve our organisation’s environmental performance

0.06211

0.77892

0.04341

− 0.02329

0.14751

1.431

321

0.153

Pair 13

Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation’s reputation—Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation’s economic performance

0.03727

0.78845

0.04394

− 0.04918

0.12371

0.848

321

0.397

Pair 14

Sustainable procurement practice will enhance our potential for international business—Sustainable procurement will help our organisation avoid sanctions

0.05280

0.75732

0.04220

− 0.03024

0.13583

1.251

321

0.212

Pair 15

Sustainable procurement practice will enhance our potential for international business—Sustainable procurement will improve our organisation’s environmental performance

− 0.08696

0.86749

0.04834

− 0.18207

0.00815

− 1.799

321

0.073

Pair 16

Sustainable procurement practice will enhance our potential for international business—Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation’s economic performance

− 0.11180

0.82405

0.04592

− 0.20215

− 0.02145

− 2.435

321

0.015

Pair 17

Sustainable procurement will help our organisation avoid sanctions—Sustainable procurement will improve our organisation’s environmental performance

− 0.13975

0.67605

0.03767

− 0.21387

− 0.06563

− 3.709

321

0.000

Pair 18

Sustainable procurement will help our organisation avoid sanctions—Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation’s economic performance

− 0.16460

0.76585

0.04268

− 0.24856

− 0.08063

− 3.857

321

0.000

Pair 19

Sustainable procurement will improve our organisation’s environmental performance—Sustainable procurement will enhance our organisation's economic performance

− 0.02484

0.78101

0.04352

− 0.11047

0.06078

− 0.571

321

0.569

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Etse, D., McMurray, A. & Muenjohn, N. Sustainable Procurement Practice: The Effect of Procurement Officers’ Perceptions. J Bus Ethics 184 , 525–548 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05150-w

Download citation

Received : 26 November 2020

Accepted : 13 May 2022

Published : 31 May 2022

Issue Date : May 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05150-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Sustainable procurement
  • Procurement officers’ perceptions
  • Diffusion of innovation theory
  • Developing countries
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, procurement process risk and performance: empirical evidence from manufacturing firms.

Benchmarking: An International Journal

ISSN : 1463-5771

Article publication date: 9 February 2022

Issue publication date: 11 January 2023

This paper employs the positivism paradigm, quantitative approach and explanatory research design. It analyses primary data obtained from manufacturing firms via structured questionnaires and uses the partial least square-structural equation modelling technique to establish the effect of individual procurement process risk on procurement performance.

Design/methodology/approach

Procurement risks are inevitable in manufacturing procurement process; a situation that could undermine the performance of manufacturing firms if not properly managed. Yet, with procurement accounting of about 14–19% of developing countries gross domestic product, the effects of procurement process risk on performance remain scarce in manufacturing firms in developing countries. Therefore, the paper aims to investigate the effect of procurement process risk on procurement performance of manufacturing firms.

In this paper, five out of the six procurement process risks studied were found to be undermining procurement performance of manufacturing firms significantly. However, the risk threshold effect on the performance differs.

Research limitations/implications

Although this research is geographically/sector bias, several insightful managerial implications can be drawn to manage procurement process risk in manufacturing settings irrespective of the area of operation. The results of this research imply that manufacturing firms' procurement process is risk prone and the effect of risk surrounding each procurement process on procurement performance differs. Hence, the need to identify and analyse the risks surrounding each procurement process before making managerial decision to spend firms limited resources in response to the individual risk to improve procurement performance in the manufacturing sector.

Originality/value

This paper is the first to provide existing and future procuring practitioners/firms with in-depth empirical evidence of the effect of the procurement process risks on procurement performance in manufacturing firms operating in developing economies.

  • Procurement process risk
  • Planning/preparation risk
  • Product/service identification risk
  • Requisition review risk
  • Supplier selection risk
  • Managerial risk
  • Procurement performance

Nyamah, E.Y. , Feng, Y. , Yeboah Nyamah, E. , Opoku, R.K. and Ewusi, M. (2023), "Procurement process risk and performance: empirical evidence from manufacturing firms", Benchmarking: An International Journal , Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 75-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2021-0306

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

procurement process Recently Published Documents

Total documents.

  • Latest Documents
  • Most Cited Documents
  • Contributed Authors
  • Related Sources
  • Related Keywords

Client-led promotion of health and safety through the procurement process on public construction projects in developing countries

Enhancing a scrm curriculum with cybersecurity.

Supply chain-related curricula exist across many universities, with many including risk management as an important or focal element. With the rise of software-driven technology across the supply chain, how can firms manage the inherent risks associated with software as part of a procurement process? This article examines how to provide context appropriate cybersecurity exemplars in a model supply chain education program, bringing to light the issue of embedded risk in software acquisition. Through a series of specifically placed educational elements that provide targeted cybersecurity knowledge to students, the objective is to provide additional skill sets for future supply chain professionals to assist firms in including software related cybersecurity risk as a component in SCRM.

How ENI Can Improve Procurement Through Blockchain Technology

The study aims at investigating the potential use of blockchain technology in procurement processes. To better understand how the procurement process works, the case study of Eni is analyzed. Eni seeks to decarburize all its products by 2050, and its fight towards the energy transition is committed to working with suppliers ready to support it in this vision. After understanding the procurement process within Eni and identifying the potential uses of blockchain within these processes, the chapter proves that blockchain could be a powerful tool for the procurement process, especially for supplier qualification.

A Model for Detection and Prevention of Unbalanced Bid in the Public Work Procurement Process in India

Indian Public procurement works contribute almost 30% of the total GDP, most of the large and massively funded projects are public-funded, utilizing the tax collected from the citizens of the country. Hence, any discrepancies associated with such projects have direct implications on the taxpayers. The public procurement process, due to legal bindings and ethics is prone to various malpractices, that affect the overall performance of the system. Hence, it becomes imperative to prevent anomalies associated with the public procurement process. One of the anomalies associated with public procurement is an Unbalanced bid, a method of redistributing the project cost such that it varies from the Engineer’s Estimate. The ethics related to Unbalanced bid varies, contractors state that unbalanced bidding is moral and find its application beneficial to the project performance while clients and officials opine that an unbalanced bid is an unethical practice to jeopardize project progress and client’s money. The unbalanced bid can be of four types – Quantity Error Exploitation, Front-loaded Bid, Back loaded Bid, and Collusive bid. The research intends to propose a model to detect and prevent unbalanced bids respecting the constraints of the public procurement process in India, enhancing project performance, and protecting tax payer’s money.

Sustainable Public Procurement: Guidance Note on Procurement

This guidance note aims to assist ADB staff and borrowers (including grant recipients) on how to incorporate aspects of sustainability in the public procurement process.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of federal resources in healthcare institutions

This article discusses issues related to the effectiveness of the use of federal budget funds, provides references to legislative and regulatory acts related to the issue under study, forms an algorithm for the stages of the procurement process, highlights the distinctive features and characteristics of public procurement in the institution of the zrdavookhraneniya system (on the example of the State Budgetary Institution of the State Budgetary Institution named after S. P. Botkin), provides materials for the study of the effectiveness of the use of budget funds of public sector organizations, including in the healthcare sector, and also gives an assessment.

Contractor default: Predictions, politics, and penalties in the procurement process

Ensuring the quality and quantity of personal protective equipment (ppe) by enhancing the procurement process in northern ireland during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: challenges in the procurement process for ppe in ni.

This article outlines the purchasing process for personal protective equipment that was established for Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland in response to the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019. The Business Services Organisation Procurement and Logistics Service, who are the sole provider of goods and services for Health and Social Care organisations, was faced with an unprecedented demand for personal protective equipment in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The usual procurement process was further complicated by changing messages within guidelines which resulted in confusion and anxiety when determining whether or not a product would meet the required safety guidance and was therefore suitable for purchase. In order to address these issues in a rapidly changing and escalating scenario the Department of Health asked the Business Services Organisation Procurement and Logistics Service to work with the Medicines Optimisation Innovation Centre to maximise the availability of personal protective equipment whilst ensuring that it met all requisite quality and standards. A process was implemented whereby the Medicines Optimisation Innovation Centre validated all pertinent essential documentation relating to products to ensure that all applicable standards were met, with the Business Services Organisation Procurement and Logistics Service completing all procurement due diligence tasks in line with both normal and coronavirus disease 2019 emergency derogations. It is evident from the data presented that whilst there were a significant number of potential options for supply, a large proportion of these were rejected due to failure to meet the quality assurance criteria. Thus, by the process that was put in place, a large number of unsuitable products were not purchased and only those that met extant standards were approved.

Six Sigma Approach to Enhance Concurrency of the Procurement Process for Raw Materials

This paper presents the improvement of the procurement process for raw materials in a real manufacturing company supported by the Lean Sig Sigma as structured approach to deliver the improvement. The manufacturing company that is a subject of this paper have received a significant amount of complains regarding the internal purchase orders approval process and the overall procurement process of the company from both internal employees and external vendors and contractors. Considering that the company is procuring the raw goods from selected vendors, therefore the entire manufacturing plan depends on these materials, the company decided to improve this process trough Lean Six Sigma. The Lean Six Sigma approach was selected in order to obtain the improvement in a short time, based on indicators that were previously analyzed and prioritized. The paper focuses on simplifying of the process trough decreasing the number of mandatory steps.

Lessons of Centralized Procurement of Domestic Office and Antivirus Software in 2019–2020 Years

The article shows effects assessment of procurement process centralisation and centralized purchasing; describes case of centralized procurement of domestic office and antivirus software for federal government bodies; explain advantages and disadvantages; forms recommendations for future centralized procurement.

Export Citation Format

Share document.

procurement research papers

procurement research papers

  • Learning Overview
  • What is Pathways?
  • Competency Framework
  • Certificates
  • Designations
  • Specializations
  • Workforce Development
  • NIGP Certification
  • Bring Pathways to your Agency
  • Pathways Concierge
  • All Courses
  • Introduction to Public Procurement
  • Courses by Month
  • Courses by Topic
  • Courses by Format
  • Courses by Job Role
  • Courses by Level
  • Instructor Directory
  • Search for a Course
  • Prepare for the NIGP-CPP
  • CPPO & CPPB Exam Prep
  • Events Overview
  • NIGP Forum 2024
  • Webinar Recordings
  • NIGP Mastermind Program
  • Certification Overview
  • Why Attain the NIGP-CPP
  • Current NIGP-CPPs
  • Hear from your Peers
  • Get Started
  • Map your Timeline
  • How to Apply
  • Understand the Exam
  • Prep for the NIGP-CPP Exam
  • Register for Testing
  • Exam Pass/Fail Stats
  • How to Recertify
  • NIGP-CPP Retired Status
  • Authorized Educational Providers
  • Resources Overview
  • The Impact of Procurement
  • Cooperative Purchasing Programs
  • Search Contracts
  • State & Provinces Procurement Websites
  • Other Associations
  • Higher Education Programs
  • Values and Guiding Principles
  • Global Best Practices
  • Dictionary of Terms
  • Procurement Month
  • NIGP Community News
  • Research & Reports
  • Standardized Job Descriptions
  • NIGP Bookstore
  • Document Library
  • Member Communities (NSite)
  • NIGP Consulting
  • Accreditation
  • Agency Training
  • Working in Public Procurement
  • Career Opportunities
  • Membership/NIGP Overview
  • Become a Member
  • Renew - Individual Member
  • Renew - Agency Representative
  • Member Anniversaries
  • Member Directories
  • Scholarships
  • Individual Awards
  • Agency Awards
  • Volunteer Opportunities
  • Our Leadership
  • Committee and Task Forces
  • Work at NIGP
  • Chapters Overview
  • About NIGP Chapters
  • Chapter Connections
  • Resource Library
  • Annual Reporting Forms
  • Host a NIGP Course
  • Chapter Visits and Ambassadors
  • Chapter Academy
  • Awards and Recognition
  • Leader Webinars
  • Partners Overview
  • Sponsorship Opportunities
  • NIGP Business Council
  • Educational Opportunities
  • Partners and Affiliations
  • NSite Communities

Research & Reports

  • Cooperative Procurement
  • Professional Certification
  • Negotiation
  • Promoting the Value of Procurement
  • Protests and Disputes
  • Public and Private Partnerships
  • Risk Management, Insurance, and Bonding
  • Specifications and Scope Writing
  • Spend Analysis and Management
  • Standardization
  • Strategic Planning
  • Supplier Relationship Management
  • Sustainability

Browse our collection of position papers, research reports, and white papers on topics that are relevant to public procurement. 

Browse our Collection

New white paper - coming soon, putting the pieces in place: solving the puzzle of connecting supplier evaluations, scorecards and ratings, research papers, position papers, white papers.

NIGP provides practical and useful research findings to help procurement professionals in their everyday decision making.

 2023 NIGP Workforce Competency Study

In January 2023, NIGP initiated this project aimed at identifying and mapping the continuing education needs of its members.

Two primary questions guided the research:

  • What are the current skills and knowledge held by procurement professionals in the field?
  • What are the skills and knowledge that employers look for when recruiting professionals for procurement positions at various career stages?

The 2023 NIGP Workforce Competency Study is designed to serve a dual audience. On one hand, it aims to empower procurement professionals by providing them with insights into the skills and knowledge that are highly valued in their field, thereby guiding their professional development efforts.

On the other hand, it seeks to inform and encourage entities to invest time and resources in the professional development of their procurement workforce. By doing so, it underscores the importance of nurturing a competent and well-equipped procurement team for the overall success of the organization.

DOWNLOAD WORKFORCE COMPETENCY STUDY

Workforce Competency Study - At a Glance

 Buy Quiet Program

The “Buy Quiet (BQ) Program”, initiated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through cooperative agreements with the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP) and the National League of Cities (NLC), was a program through which the purchasing power of U.S. public organizations was successfully leveraged to help address one sustainability issue, quiet communities, through market-based, incentive driven procurement. The Buy Quiet Program was part of a broader effort by EPA’s Office of Noise Abatement and Control’s (ONAC) to promote quiet communities through non-regulatory means.

Download - The Buy Quiet Contextual Framework

2022 Public Procurement Compensation & Retention Benchmark Study

First published in 2003, NIGP’s biennial Public Procurement Compensation & Retention Benchmark Study provides comparative compensation information to help industry leaders classify public procurement positions and determine appropriate salary ranges. Based on data provided by a survey of 2,500 public procurement professionals, this year’s report finds sustained increases in public procurement salaries across the board. However, key variables (e.g., entity type, gender, certification) can have a significant impact on what individuals earn.

Download - 2022 Public Procurement Compensation & Retention Benchmark Study

View all of the data included in full salary report

 Achieving the Full Promise and Potential of Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing

An Intergovernmental Systems Case Study

There are more than 90,000 independent state, local and education governments (SLED Government Agencies) in the United States, that collectively spend over $1.5 Trillion annually on products and services to support operations.  Over the past 30 years, use of intergovernmental cooperative purchasing has grown among SLED Government Agencies however less than 1% of the $1.5 Trillion annual spend is spent on products and services. This demonstrates that intergovernmental cooperative purchasing is underperforming: the promise and potential has not been achieved.  Realizing the full potential and promise of intergovernmental cooperative purchasing requires identifying and resolving current limitations and challenges SLED Government Agencies experience.

Read - Achieving the Full Promise and Potential of Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing

Getting the Job Done in Public Procurement During COVID-19

The purpose of this Research Report is to describe what was actually occurring in the public procurement trenches during COVID-19; identify some of the common challenges faced by procurement professionals; enumerate what was accomplished; and establish important lessons we learned about emergency management. The model used in this study looks at preparedness, response, and recovery, both in terms of addressing community and government needs, and specifying some lessons learned from procurement challenges posed by COVID-19

Download - Getting the Job Done in Public Procurement During COVID-19

 NASPO's Assessing State PPE Procurement During COVID-19: A RESEARCH REPORT

Published by NASPO this report focuses on the PPE shortages that occurred throughout the United States in 2020. It examines the structural influence of state procurement offices on the ability to respond in an agile and effective manner, specifically exploring how the levels of centralization of state procurement, led by the state Chief Procurement Officer (CPOs), were associated with the responsiveness of state agencies to obtain PPE supplies during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Download - Assessing State PPE Procurement During COVID-19: A RESEARCH REPORT

 Procurement Compensation & Retention Benchmark Study 2020

The National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP) is pleased to offer its eighth biennial Compensation Survey Report on positions within public sector procurement. This report covers the 2020 study and reports key data from the previous seven studies. Each of the studies covered two years of data as respondents were asked to report their current year salary (as of the previous December) as well as their previous year’s salary. For the first time, this report includes an 18-year salary trend for procurement professionals starting with 2001 through 2019. No data was collected between 2011 and 2015.

DOWNLOAD - Procurement Compensation & Retention Benchmark Study 2020

 Public Procurement Benchmark Survey Report 2019

NIGP strives to provide practical and useful research findings to assist everyday decision making for procurement professionals. Benchmarks and benchmarking, due to increasing budgetary constraints, represent two dimensions that our members find particularly important in supporting their daily work.

The role of public procurement as a profession and governing pillar has been growing steadily over the last few years. Increasingly, public procurement is being recognized as a means for government organizations to achieve operational efficiencies. The challenge this poses is that often, procurement departments within government entities are frequently understaffed, underfunded, and under-trained. Typically procurement professionals must go outside of organizations for reliable training resources to progress in their careers and help their entities achieve success.

This report provides entities with a structured way to compare their operations with those of other public procurement entities. Survey results focus on specific operating practices and processes that allow individual entities to examine and identify potential opportunities to improve operating practices within their organization.

DOWNLOAD - Public Procurement Benchmark Survey Report 2019

 Local Government Entity Sustainable Procurement Study 2019

This research paper discusses current trends in sustainable procurement in local governments across North America, particularly within the United States, focusing on supplier diversity and green procurement.

The report defines supplier diversity as minority and women-owned business programs that encourage participation in contracting opportunities for these underrepresented groups and may also have a broader socioeconomic goal. It defines green public procurement as the approach public authorities take to integrate environmental criteria into all stages of the procurement process.

With these definitions in mind, the report assesses supplier diversity and green procurement as major components of sustainable procurement initiatives. It uses research collected in 2018 from NIGP's survey of local government member entities. The survey collected information about how relevant green public procurement and supplier diversity practices are among entities, with varying results.

The report includes aggregated results of responses to the survey that was sent out in 2018. After reading the report, readers will have a better understanding of how entities across the United States are or are not implementing green public procurement and supplier diversity initiatives within their organization.

DOWNLOAD - Local Government Entity Sustainable Procurement Study 2019

 Procurement Compensation & Retention Benchmark Study 2018

NIGP's seventh biennial Compensation Survey Report offers comparative compensation information to classify public procurement positions and determine appropriate salary ranges. In addition, this year's report includes a supplement on retention and turnover rates.

The 2018 study was conducted using two survey instruments that were issued to NIGP members. The first is an agency survey that asked agency representatives to submit information about the number of people who held positions in each position within their organization, along with salary information for each position for the current and previous year. The second survey instrument was issued to all individuals who receive NIGP member benefits. This survey asked members to submit information about their salary along with factors that can impact their salary, including education, certification, benefits, and bonuses.

As a result of sending out these two surveys, NIGP received self-reported responses from 590 procurement agencies and 2,450 procurement professionals in the United States and Canada. 

This report shows that salaries for procurement professionals are on the rise across ranks and that the majority of procurement professionals in higher ranked positions hold procurement-specific certifications. It includes specific salary range information for different regions within the United States and Canada that can be useful for procurement professionals and agencies to study when making salary and hiring decisions.

Additional data included in this report includes information about the relationship between education and job success, and cites the primary reasons why procurement professionals who intend to leave their positions do so.

DOWNLOAD - Procurement Compensation & Retention Benchmark Study 2018

 The Challenges, Benefits, and Best Practices of Effectively Adopting ERP Systems: A Procurement Perspective 2018

There is a growing trend of public entities adopting Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. This report provides greater understanding of ERP systems, including their scope, logical frame, and operational capacities. Additionally, it develops a framework of the most difficult challenges facing organizations when adopting ERP systems and provides procurement professionals with practical steps and best practices to follow for procuring an ERP system.

The report is motivated by market trends and conversations with professionals who expressed their disappointment in how the procurement modules perform within these systems. It was compiled using research from reviewed publications, interviews of procurement professionals, and a survey that solicited input from 1,000 agencies on their experiences implementing an ERP software system within their organization.

After reading this report, procurement professionals will have a better understanding of how ERP systems operate and what steps to take when procuring one for their organization.

DOWNLOAD - The Challenges, Benefits, and Best Practices of Effectively Adopting ERP Systems: A Procurement Perspective 2018

 A Guide to Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) - What Public Procurement Specialists Need to Know

Facing increasingly constrained budgets and with an inability to generate additional revenues, many governments have turned to partnerships with the private and nonprofit sectors.

The main purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive discussion of PP/NP arrangements. And while the rhetoric surrounding their development has been overwhelmingly positive – in reality, there is much confusion.

It is important that public procurement specialists remain realistic about the possibilities of PP/NPs and proceed with caution when advocating or establishing such contractual relationships.

DOWNLOAD - A Guide to Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) - What Public Procurement Specialists Need to Know

 The Value of Procurement Certification

This report presents the findings of research undertaken to gain insight into how North American public procurement officials perceive the value of professional certification in public procurement and contract management (PPCM). The results indicate that most of the PPCM practitioners believe professional certification is beneficial for both PPCM officials and their employers. This report also presents findings related to why some PPCM officials do not seek professional certification; why public entities do or do not require or consider certification; how managers who are themselves PPCM officials compare the performance of PPCM employees who are certified with the performance of PPCM employees who are not certified; and the extent to which organizations that employ PPCM officials provide support and incentives to promote and recognize certification.

DOWNLOAD - The Value of Procurement Certification

 Characteristics and Contract Type Report

Products vary on two key dimensions, how easy or difficult it is to define the product’s requirements and the degree to which specialized investments are required to produce the product. While contracts for complex products pose greater risks of cost overruns, delivery delays, and failed products, these risks are exacerbated when there is a mismatch between the type of contract used to acquire the product and the product’s characteristics. Consistent with contracting best practice and regulatory guidance, fixed price contracts are best suited for simple products and cost reimbursement contracts are best suited for complex products.

This report provides measures of product characteristics that are sources of risks in contracting, namely the degree to which it is difficult to specify the product’s attributes or requirements, and the degree to which specialized investments are required to produce the product.

DOWNLOAD - Characteristics and Contract Type Report

 Sustainable Public Procurement

With the ever-changing focus on public procurement practices and in order to enhance, support and advocate for advancements within the field, this report is being presented to identify the trend of sustainable public procurement (SPP) practices within public sector agencies. The survey from which this report is based aims to emphasize the values placed within public agencies pertaining to sustainable practices and the future direction of SPP. Understanding of the findings of this report, while limited in its scope due to the nature of the survey, do contain a number of beneficial recommendations. These recommendations address a forward-thinking direction of practice within public sector agencies and must be considered within the constraints presented by both the sample and methodology used.

DOWNLOAD - Sustainable Public Procurement

The CPO-CIO Relationship Survey Report

The role played by information technologies (IT) in public procurement has increased dramatically in the past two decades. By most accounts the trend is expected to continue into the future. The success of any adoption process depends heavily on the relationship between internal stakeholders. Within this context, the relationship between an organization’s Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) and Chief Information Officer (CIO) becomes of particular interest. This report provides the findings of recent research that evaluated some challenges and opportunities within the relationships between CPOs and CIOs.

DOWNLOAD - The CPO-CIO Relationship Survey Report

NIGP position papers define the organization's position on important and relevant procurement topics, policies, and practices that have far-reaching implications for procurement professionals and the customers they support.   Position papers are developed by a volunteer task force under the leadership of the NIGP Board-appointed Legislative and Position Committee.

 Best Value Procurement Methods: Professional Services - Overcoming the Limitations of Low-Bid and QBS

In this position paper, NIGP explores procurement best practices and methods for overcoming the limitations of low-bid and qualifications-based selection (QBS) methods of selecting professional services providers. NIGP does not support mandates that require public entities to apply a QBS method for selecting service providers. Instead, NIGP supports two principles, i) price competition and, ii) ideas competition.

When combined with other important factors to achieving public interest, following these two principles can lead to balance in procurement situations. To achieve this balance, it is essential for a public entity to match its selection criteria with its needs and the options available on the marketplace.

This paper explores how public procurement has learned from previous mistakes of focusing solely on price, and the importance of relying on other methods to evaluate suppliers, including a best value" selection method to create a more equitable competitive landscape. It demonstrates how this method is better for public entities because it is not a one-size-fits-all method and, therefore, is more likely to be suitable for all types of entities and situations.

DOWNLOAD - Best Value Procurement Methods: Professional Services - Overcoming the Limitations of Low-Bid and QBS

 Maintaining Procurement Principles as Technology Advances

This position paper explores the importance of maintaining principles in the procurement profession and the challenges presented by an ever-changing technological environment. Technology is, overall, having a positive impact on public procurement operations, especially in the advancement of e-procurement. However, there are also limitations to consider, including the fact that technology has the potential to enable shortcuts or remove professional judgment at particular steps, which could lead to several risks, including fraud.

As advances in technology permeate procurement activities, procurement professionals need to understand the potential implications of technology when it's utilized in their organization's procurement systems.  Implementing procurement solutions that are technology-based will not change underlying laws or policies, just processes. In order to preserve the integrity of the procurement process, procurement professionals need to closely examine all changes to ensure that processes strengthen procurement values, including remaining fair and inclusive.

This paper examines the potential implications of an e-procurement process and outlines steps for procurement professionals to take when adapting from a manual to a technologically-driven process that maintains the integrity of the procurement profession.

DOWNLOAD - Maintaining Procurement Principles as Technology Advances

 The Strategic Value of Procurement in Public Entities

The strategic value of procurement in public entities is not always readily apparent, especially compared with other important elements, such as making sure taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly. While not all-encompassing, this paper addresses several ways that procurement adds strategic value to public entities, including risk mitigation, contract management, supplier relationship management, technology use, and spend management.

NIGP believes strongly that organizations must involve procurement professionals early in the strategic planning process to gain the most value for their respective organizations. When procurement professionals have a strong seat at the planning table and are brought on early, they ensure that their procurement strategies align with the organization's overall goals and strategies.

In addition to describing how procurement adds strategic value to public entities, this paper also discusses opportunities available for procurement professionals eager to deliver strategic value to their public entity every day. By understanding how and when they can add value, procurement professionals are better equipped to make decisions that have a positive impact on the public.

DOWNLOAD - The Strategic Value of Procurement in Public Entities

 Local Preference in Public Procurement

This paper explores the reasons why NIGP does not support the use of preference policies. NIGP maintains that preference policies, including local preferences, conflict with the fundamental public procurement principles of impartiality and full and open competition. Those who promote preference policies claim advantages of helping and protecting the local economy. However, there are also considerable disadvantages to consider, including an increased cost to taxpayers to implement these types of program, a limitation on supplier competition, and a reduced incentive for local businesses to provide the best value for the dollar of purchased goods and services.

While NIGP does not support the use of preference policies, it does support economic, social, and sustainable communities as part of its core values and guiding principles. NIGP acknowledges that governments might adopt local preferences as a tool for improving their local economies and recommends that local procurement preferences only be implemented as one of several criteria in a 'best value' evaluation and award process.

This paper examines advantages and disadvantages to local preferences in public procurement and gives an in-depth explanation of why NIGP does not support it as a means of improving local economies.

DOWNLOAD - Local Preference in Public Procurement

 Procurement Authority in Public Entities

Procurement authority is a fundamental concept in the public sector and in the administration of government. It is extremely important for governments to spend taxpayer dollars responsibly, protected from undue influence and in the best interest of the communities they serve. Government can achieve these goals by following public procurement policies, which are best accomplished by delegating procurement authority to a Chief Procurement Officer who is accountable to a governing body or chief executive. 

This paper explores what a public authority is, why it's important, and who should hold the position of public authority. It will also make a case for delegating procurement authority to the Chief Procurement Officer. It demonstrates that, by remaining impartial and transparent, the Chief Procurement Officer can help ensure that public funds are awarded to serve the best interest of the public at large and in full compliance of public policy and law.

DOWNLOAD - Procurement Authority in Public Entities

 Best Value in Government Procurement

Achieving best value is an essential goal of procurement practices. This position paper defines the NIGP understanding of what "Best Value Procurement" means and identifies steps organizations can take to articulate best value for their organization and how to achieve it.

"Value" combines several elements, including identifying what is important and how much is important. Describing the value of a procured good or service includes several procurement considerations, such as the reliability of suppliers, prioritizing preferences for types of businesses (veteran-owned, minority-owned, small businesses, etc.), and identifying all costs through a cost-life analysis.

This paper also describes the concept of a best value policy (BVP), which provides a framework for organizations to use in decision making, and it includes standards for accountability and a series of questions for procurement professionals to answer when determining what best value means for a particular situation.

DOWNLOAD - Best Value in Government Procurement

 Negotiation: Lost Art or Core Competency?

Negotiation is a valuable skill for procurement professionals and is a standard method of contracting in federal, state, and local government procurement. In procurement, negotiating is mainly used to help buyers and sellers arrive at a settlement, and it takes the form of binding contracts.  Knowing how to effectively negotiate can help procurement professionals make sure their contracts bring the most value to their organization. Beyond that, procurement professionals should also understand how to negotiate in a way that still satisfies the other party.

Procurement professionals need to prepare and plan for negotiations in order to achieve win-win solutions. Negotiation can improve the overall combination of quality, service and other elements required for successfully meeting the organization’s requirements. As a core competency, negotiation requires training and practice through professional development.

This paper explores how negotiation is perceived in the world of public procurement and explores whether it is understood as a lost art or a core competency among agencies. It offers suggestions for how procurement professionals can improve their negotiating skills.

DOWNLOAD - Negotiation: Lost Art or Core Competency?

 Cooperative Procurement: Great Value, Great Confusion

Cooperative procurement solutions offer resource challenged agencies the opportunity to improve the efficiency of their operations while saving money. This paper demonstrates how cooperative procurement is effective in saving taxpayer dollars, and what makes it a viable alternative to conventional, independent procurement processes.

Cooperative solutions are appropriate for many circumstances, but they are not a solo solution for all purchases at all times. Cooperative procurement was developed to meet specific needs to realize their full value when applied with an understanding of their appropriate use and limitations.

This position paper describes NIGP’s view of cooperative practices and programs while also examining the nature of, and changes in, the cooperative procurement landscape. It recommends best practices in the evaluation and use of cooperative solutions and emphasizes the responsibility of procurement professionals to ensure that cooperative solutions are implemented in a manner consistent with local legislation and with due regard for preference groups.

DOWNLOAD - Cooperative Procurement: Great Value, Great Confusion

 Outsourcing in the Public Sector

Outsourcing in the Public Sector emphasizes the essential role of procurement staff in the outsourcing decision and its successful execution. In the public sector, the term "outsourcing" refers to the practice of contracting out to third-party vendors functions that had previously been completed by public employees. The practice of outsourcing can be fiscally sound. However, it should not be undertaken without serious consideration about its potential implications.

Outsourcing has been common practice in government for at least a century, although it gained momentum in the 1980's. While not a new concept, outsourcing still has a direct impact on a government entity’s ability to function successfully and deliver necessary services to the public.

This paper discusses the role of the Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) in making the decision for a public entity to outsource. The decision to outsource must be well-informed and thoughtful. It should be supported by skilled professionals who have the strategic vision and expertise to improve operations while protecting the public good.

DOWNLOAD - Outsourcing in the Public Sector

Transparency in Government Procurement

Public procurement has a unique role when it comes to how democratic government is executed. It is simultaneously focused on supporting the missions of internal customers, while also serving as stewards of the public​, whose tax dollars directly impact the decisions that their governing body make.

Transparency is essential for building trust and keeping the public aware of government practices in a democracy. Through transparency, government agencies can increase public confidence and ensure government stability. Technology has evolved to help government agencies communicate directly to the public, yet not every government entity has the financial ability to provide technology-based information.

In this position paper, NIGP highlights the historical importance of transparency in a democracy and reviews the contemporary tools available that enable even greater transparency. It offers a series of recommendations that governments can adopt to achieve transparency in practice, without undue burden. 

DOWNLOAD - Transparency in Government Procurement

The NIGP library of white papers aim to improve the supplier/buyer relationship by sharing the supplier's perspective with the larger public procurement community.

That Was Then, This is Now

Why suppliers are still choosing to ‘no bid’.

In 2013, the NIGP Business Council created its first white paper, “We ‘No Bid,’ and I’ll Tell You Why.” It was developed based on a Council conversation with the NIGP Governing Board, and it has been a recurring topic among members over the years. The Council has presented on this topic numerous times at events throughout the country, including NIGP chapter events, webinars, and the NIGP Forum.

Based on its popularity and impact—and the fact that many entities continue to receive insufficient supplier responses to their solicitations—the Council decided to update the paper to keep it timely and relevant for NIGP’s membership. The Council hopes it inspires a continued dialogue in the community.

Read the Executive Summary

DOWNLOAD - That Was Then, This is Now, Why Suppliers Are Still Choosing to ‘No Bid’

 The Supplier-Practitioner Connection

In this white paper, the 2017 NIGP Business Council examines the different ways that suppliers can add value to procurement, regardless of the procurement strategy an agency is using. Public procurement professionals employ a range of strategies to make procurement decisions that best meet the needs and goals of their agencies. Some use a best value approach or financial analysis while others use cooperative purchasing agreements or other strategies. Although their strategies may differ, all procurement professionals can find value in working closely with their suppliers.

This paper is intended to help procurement professionals and suppliers obtain a better understanding of how to strengthen this critical relationship. It explores how suppliers can help entities with their procurement strategies. It also provides information on what suppliers must do to provide value to an entity or agency even when changes occur in the marketplace. When suppliers and procurement practitioners work together, they can form mutually beneficial relationships that add value to their entities.

DOWNLOAD - The Supplier-Practitioner Connection

 Total Cost of Ownership: Realizing Procurement's Full Potential in Value Creation

In this white paper, the 2016 NIGP Business Council explores the total cost of ownership (TCO) approach to procurement and how it can help agencies achieve best value and sustainable, long-term cost savings or performance improvements. Total Cost of Ownership: Realizing Procurement's Full Potential in Value Creation examines the value of TCO and how it can be integrated into the procurement process.

TCO is widely used in private market procurement, yet it is underutilized in government procurement, in which most agencies still focus on price when selecting suppliers instead of considering the full value that a supplier can bring to their relationship in the short- and long-term.

This white paper examines how agencies can overcome challenges in implementing a TCO approach, along with ways to identify and realize some quick wins to gain traction and quantify the value of utilizing TCO. Finally,  this paper discusses the benefits of this approach and how it can positively impact an agency and the public.

DOWNLOAD - Total Cost of Ownership: Realizing Procurement's Full Potential in Value Creation

 The Healthy Agency-Supplier Relationship Guide

The Healthy-Agency Supplier Relationship Guide, presented by the NIGP Business Council, looks at several different ways that procurement professionals and suppliers can improve their communication and outcomes through specific activities. These activities apply not only to contract-based interactions, but also to the relationship procurement staff and end users have with suppliers when not discussing or considering a specific contract. These interactions can include daily small threshold purchases or simply discussing industry trends and hot topics.

Some of the recommended practices offered in this guide include developing a supplier/procurement communication plan, creating a formal process for communication, holding ongoing meetings with potential offerors, sharing contractual pricing, participating in training opportunities, etc. 

These practices are applicable to a wide range of situations and types of solicitations and suppliers. They are intended to help both suppliers and agencies save valuable time and money while improving communication and developing a more collaborative procurement process.

DOWNLOAD - The Healthy Agency-Supplier Relationship Guide

 EVERYBODY WINS: Crafting a Solicitation that Fosters Transparency, Best Value, and Collaborative Partnership

This white paper picks up where "We 'No Bid,' and I'll Tell You Why" left off. Presented by the NIGP Business Council, this paper continues the discussion and digs deeper to discover what agencies can do to optimize the number and quality of supplier submissions to ensure that agencies can realize their operational goals. 

After talking to procurement professionals at Forum, local conferences, events, and webinars, the Business Council members who authored the original white paper address comments and questions they have been asked in "Everybody Wins: Crafting a Solicitation that Fosters Transparency, Best Value, and Collaborative Partnership." The paper's main goal is to help agencies save time, money, and resources while improving their RFP/IFB processes.

This paper includes recommended practices that procurement professionals should consider when developing an RFB/IFB in the context of four unique procurement categories: Commodities, Capital Equipment, IT and Services. Also included are three key quick reference guides that you’ll want to keep handy at all times.

DOWNLOAD - EVERYBODY WINS: Crafting a Solicitation that Fosters Transparency, Best Value, and Collaborative Partnership

We "No Bid," and I'll Tell You Why

Presented by the NIGP Business Council, this is part one in a series of white papers that connects the supplier’s perspective with the public procurement community in an effort to improve the buyer/supplier relationship. This white paper represents one of the ways in which the Business Council supports the educational mission of NIGP.

We “No Bid,” and I’ll Tell You Why is an amalgamation of real-world examples related to why a company may choose not to bid on a particular Request for Proposal (RFP) or Invitation for Bid (IFB). It is intended to present a complex topic in simple terms. For this particular subject, the authors illustrate the potential reasons why a company may choose not to bid through the use of an admittedly simplistic, low-dollar, local in scope example. However, the basic principles of this example apply to bids which are national in scope and much higher in dollar value.

DOWNLOAD - We "No Bid," and I'll Tell You Why

procurement research papers

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

  •  We're Hiring!
  •  Help Center

Public Procurement

  • Most Cited Papers
  • Most Downloaded Papers
  • Newest Papers
  • Save to Library
  • Last »
  • Public Procurement Law Follow Following
  • PUBLIC SECTOR PROCUREMENT Follow Following
  • Procurement Follow Following
  • Public Law Follow Following
  • Administrative Law Follow Following
  • Electronic Procurement Follow Following
  • Procurement Management Follow Following
  • Public Contract Law Follow Following
  • Private law Follow Following
  • Business Information System Follow Following

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • Academia.edu Publishing
  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024
  • Browse Works
  • Social & Management Sciences

Procurement and Supply Chain Management

Procurement and supply chain management research papers/topics, a study on route planning in logistics, using load distance model.

The study aimed to identify how route planning for logistic companies can efficiently implemented. Route Planning explains basic transportation strategies and frameworks, as well as crucial functional needs, while considering contemporary changes in distribution planning. Companies may save mileage, fuel use, and carbon emissions by using a route planning system that calculates the most effective routes. Businesses may better recognize unforeseen deviations and communicate proactively to...

Environmental Sustainability Strategies in Organizations: The Case Study of Apparel Companies

Companies are often seen as money making entities that place less emphasis on social concerns and promote inequality. However, many companies are coming to terms with their responsibility to make meaningful contributions to society. There have been growing needs for sustainable operations in all industries. This focus has turned to how companies can be more socially and environmentally responsible and sustainable. Sustainability is the design of human and industrial systems to ensure that hum...

Supply Chain Analytics

A wealth of data is continually being produced by supply chain networks. This data contains trends and patterns that can be found using analytics to provide useful information. The supply chain network's overall effectiveness and efficiency can then be stated to benefit greatly from analytics. The value and function of analytics in the supply chain industry are examined in this study through a critical analysis of the prior literature, a look at some major obstacles to supply chain analytics ...

Inventory Management Systems and Performance of Selected Foreign Super Markets in Kampala, Uganda

ABSTRACT The study sought to assess the effect of inventory management systems on performance of super markets in Kampala Uganda. It was guided by three specific objectives, that included; to determine the effect of just-in-time inventory on performance of super markets in Kampala Uganda, to establish the effect of vendor managed inventory on performance of super markets in Kampala Uganda and to establish the effect of material requirements planning on performance of super markets in Kampala...

The Effectiveness of Clearing and Forwarding Procedures on the Procurement Efficiency Case Study Somalia Port Authority

Table of Contents Title page ............................................................................................ .i Table of contents .................................................................................... .ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ .iv LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................ .ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................

Donor Procurement Requirements and Supply Chain Management in Selected NGOs in Bangui, Central African Republic

ABSTRACT The study was confined on Donor Procurement Requirements and Supply Chain Management in Selected NGOs in Bangui, Central African Republic. The study was guided by the following objectives: To determine the social demographic characteristics of respondents in terms of; Gender, Age, Educational qualification, Marital status; To determine the level of Donor Procurement Requirements; To determine the level of Supply Chain Management in Selected NGOs; To establish if there is a significan...

Appraisal of the Deployment of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in Traffic Management in Port Harcourt Metropolis

Traffic demand is growing steadily in the world today, the authorities are with daily challenges, such as the road and time spent travelling, there should certainty added global concern about the protection of the environment different kinds of contaminations including noise and vibration caused by todays level motorization. The aim of this study is to appraise the deployment of ICT in the management and control of traffic in the Port Harcourt metropolis. This study used empirical evidence fo...

Logistics Support and Achievements of Concern Worldwide Programs in Katanga Province, Democratic Republic of Congo

ABSTRACT  The study establishes the relationship between Logistics support and achievements of Concern Worldwide programs in Katanga province, Democratic Republic of Congo. The study was guided by the following objectives:- To determine the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of: gender, age, educational qualification and length of experience in procurement and supply activities; to determine the level of Logistic support in Concern Worldwide programs in terms of;-communication, ...

The Impact of Maritime Fraud on Shopping Operations in the Nigerian Port Authority

A STUDY OF MARITIME FRAUD  Abstract: This study examined maritime fraud and its effects on world seaborne trade. The Nigeria port authority is in charge of seaport and other marine elements in Nigeria and responsible for the regulations of shipping and other international trade in the country. This study adopted a doctrinal method. That is, library oriented using a qualitative research design. The internet was also consulted. Materials consulted are statute books, international treaties, t...

Procurement Best Practices and the Performance of Public Sector A Case of Tanzania Buildings Agency in Tanzania

ABSTRACT  The study assessed Procurement Best Practices on the Performance of Public Sector. The specific objectives of the study were; to assess the level of compliance to best public procurement practices by TBA, to analyze the barriers of best procurement practices in the public sector and to determine the relationship between best public procurement practices and performance of public sector’. The study adopted descriptive research design. The population of the study was 120 employees ...

Procurement Management Information System and Procurement Performance in Selected Nongovernmental Organizations in Kigali, Rwanda

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to describe the contribution of Procurement Management Information system (PMIS) on the performance of Procurement in selected nongovernmental organizations in Kigali, Rwanda and validating theory regarding the topic under investigation. Four research objectives have been formulated to guide the study, namely to establish the profile of the respondents; to determine the extent of Procurement Management Information system usage, to determine the level of ...

Procurement Planning and Accountability of Local Government in Bosaso Puntland, Somalia

ABSTRACT The study examined the relationship between procurement planning and accountability of local government in Bosaso Puntland Somalia. The study was guided by three objectives, determine; extent of procurement planning, extent accountability of local government, and whether there was a significant relationship between procurement planning and accountability of local government in Bosaso Puntland Somalia. The study comprised of a population of 190 respondents who included local governmen...

Procurement Planning and Value for Money Among Selected Districts in Rwanda

ABSTRACT This study investigated the effect of procurement planning on value for money Among Selected Districts in Southern Province, Rwanda. The study was limited to the following objectives: i) to determine the effect of procurement packaging on value for money Among Selected Districts in Southern Province, Rwanda ii) to establish the effect of procurement method on value for money Among Selected Districts in Southern Province, Rwanda and iii) to find out the effect of procurement schedulin...

Procurement Practices and Organizational Performance in Selected Telecommunication Industry in Hargeisa, Somaliland

ABSTRACT  The study was to assess the effect of procurement practices on organizational performance in selected telecommunication industry in Hargeisa, Sornaliland. It was guided by three specific objectives, that included; to examine the effect of procurement planning on organizational performance in selected telecommunication industry in Hargeisa, Somaliland, to examine the effect of ethical procurement practices on organizational performance in selected telecommunication industry in Harge...

Procurement Planning and Service Delivery in Jinja Local Government, Uganda

ABSTRACT  The study established the effect of procurement planning on service delivery in Jinja district Local Government, three specific objectives guided this study and these were; (i) to examine the effect of budget plans on service delivery in Jinja district Local Government, (ii) to establish the effect of procurement methods on service delivery in Jinja district Local Government, and (iii) to assess the effect of quality plans on service delivery in Jinja district Local Government. The...

Procurement research topics, Supply chain management research topics, Procurement projects, thesis, dissertations, research papers, seminars. Supply chain management projects, thesis, dissertations, research papers

Popular Papers/Topics

Procurement practices and organisational performance of private universities in greater accra, the effect of information and communication technology (ict) on inventory management of organization.case study: kenya ports authority (kpa) mombasa, effect of supply chain management practices on the performance of supermarkets in luanda town, kenya, the role of a purchasing department in the performance of an. organization. a case study of tana delta irrigation project (tdip), effect of e - procurement on supply chain performance of county governments in kenya: case study of busia county government, assessing procurement committees and procurmeent laws in the northern region of ghana, "the impact of negotiation strategies on procurement efficiency in an organization"case study world food programme-uganda, effect of lean practices on operational performance of vihiga county government, kenya, relationship betweengreen manufacturing practices and performance of kibos sugar and allied industries limited kisumu, kenya, analysis of the relationship between strategic procurement techniques and corporate performance of united millers, kisumu, effect iof irisk iassessment ipractices ion isupply ichain iperformance iin ipublic icorporations: case iof ikenya ipower icompany, electronic procurement and organizational performancf~ a case stui)y of spear motors ugani)a ltd, buyer-supplier relationship on supply chain performance a case study of byeyogere steelworks ltd, relationship between supply chain risks, supply chain strategies and performance of large scale manufacturing firms in kenya, quality control measures and efficiency in manufacturing indutries: a case study of mukwano industries limited.

Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Terms | Copyright | © 2024, Afribary Limited. All rights reserved.

procurement research papers

About The Procurement Imperative

procurement research papers

The global procurement landscape is rapidly evolving to align itself with the strategic vision and mission of the organisation and expand upon its traditional role of spend management.

The Procurement Imperative, commissioned by SAP and developed by Economist Impact, aims to expand on the paradigms explored in the first two years and seeks to assess the evolving function of procurement from a risk management, supplier engagement, external workforce management, collaboration and technology and sustainability adoption standpoint.

For a third consecutive year, Economist Impact conducted a global survey of 2,307 C-suite executives across organisational functions, including chief financial officers (CFOs), chief operations officers (COOs), chief procurement officers (CPOs), chief supply chain officers (CSCOs), chief human resources officers (CHROs) and chief innovation officers (CIOs). The 2024 study is an expansion of the survey sample of 500 C-suite executives in 2023 and 430 in its initial year (2022). In the 2022 and 2023 iterations of The Procurement Imperative programme, the survey sample offered critical insights disaggregated at the regional level for the Americas, Asia Pacific (APAC) and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) regions. As a result of its substantial increase in 2024 to more than 2,000 responses, this executive survey provides more granular insights for each country and persona.

The 2024 barometer outlines the current state of confidence in the procurement function in order to help these C-level executives gain a clearer understanding of the factors that receive attention and vice versa.

To read the key trends in procurement and how they might impact your company, read our  global report .

The  infographic  presents relevant findings from the 2024 survey, reflecting considerable optimism and investment across digitalisation and sustainability in the year ahead

Executive survey on procurement 2024

To deepen the understanding of how senior leaders view procurement and its evolving role in business, Economist Impact, sponsored by SAP, conducted a survey of 2,307 C-suite executives in January-March 2024. The survey sample spans multiple countries, regions and industries. Now in its third iteration, the survey looks at how executives perceive procurement priorities and capabilities in risk management, internal and external collaboration, digitalisation and sustainability. Global Report -->

The latest survey aims to identify the ways in which the procurement function is working with the rest of the business to keep its seat at the table and adding value to organisational strategy.

Barometer methodology

This Procurement Confidence Barometer remains one of a kind traffic-light assessment of the perception of six senior leadership functions in advancing the procurement role. The barometer contains nine indicators organised across three categories: collaboration, risk management, and digitalisation appetite. The indicators in the barometer continue to adapt itself to measure new phenomena in the current and future iterations, as the remit of procurement function changes over time.

Economist Impact drew on the expertise of highly respected experts in the field of benchmarking, procurement and supply chains to provide input on the methodology, data sources and modelling options for the barometer. This series of expert discussions convened in March 2024 and has interacted thereafter as necessary.

For any queries or to learn more about the research behind the Procurement Imperative, please contact Economist Impact.

Project leads:

Elizabeth Mackie [email protected]

Harsheen Sethi [email protected]

Explore content

Across the procurement-verse: Changing trends in the procurement function

Procurement’s digital transformation imperative, building bridges: how to strengthen the procurement/supplier relationships, decoding confidence in the procurement function, procurement imperative barometer 2023 methodology, a view from the c-suite, opportunities for procurement in uncertain times, video highlights: global trade and supply chain summit, the procurement imperative: taking a dynamic approach to risk, chain reactions: building value in procurement through digitalisation, looking out: the rise of the external workforce and its impact on internal functions, changing with the times: category management at a crossroads, shifting gears: procurement refocuses on risk and sustainability, doing more with less: closing procurement productivity gaps.

procurement research papers

Explore more content

Unpacking the utility of relationships.

procurement research papers

Art of Procurement: Bridging the confidence gap to achieve the best business outcomes

Unpacking the impact of relationships.

procurement research papers

Talent disruption: Strategic workforce planning in age of labor shortages

Unpacking trading partner trust, spend matters.

procurement research papers

  • Group subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Manage Cookies
  • Accessibility
  • Modern Slavery Statement
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

U.S. flag

Federal Acquisition Regulation

Full far download in various formats.

FAC Number Effective Date HTML DITA PDF Word EPub Apple Books Kindle
2024-05 05/22/2024

Browse FAR Part/Subpart and Download in Various Formats

Parts/Subparts HTML DITA Print
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  • Data Initiatives
  • Regulations
  • Smart Matrix
  • Regulations Search
  • Acquisition Regulation Comparator (ARC)
  • Large Agencies
  • Small Agencies
  • CAOC History
  • CAOC Charter
  • Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC)
  • Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council
  • Interagency Suspension and Debarment Committee (ISDC)

GSA logo

ACQUISITION.GOV

An official website of the General Services Administration

TechRepublic

Techrepublic resource library.

IT white papers, webcasts, case studies, and much more - all free to registered TechRepublic members.

  • Find Search or Browse our extensive library
  • Download Free resources at the click of a button
  • Solve If you have a problem, we have the solution

Featured Resources

Clean desk policy.

When employees leave their workspaces behind — whether that’s for the night, the weekend, a longer vacation or just a quick lunch break — they may leave behind potentially sensitive information where it can easily be accessed by unauthorized parties. Unsecured USB drives, data files left open on desktops and printouts of confidential documents are ...

Hiring Kit: Chief Blockchain Officer

The chief blockchain officer is responsible for designing and implementing data-driven, forward-looking blockchain strategies aligned with business objectives. This role demands a leader capable of leading the integration of blockchain technology into a company’s operations and staying updated with recent blockchain-related trends and developments. This hiring kit TechRepublic Premium provides a workable framework you can ...

Quantum Computing Use Cases

Quantum computing is an emerging computing paradigm at the intersection of computer science, physics and mathematics. Unlike classical computers that use bits — either 0 or 1 — as their fundamental computational blocks, quantum computers use quantum bits, or “qubits.” These qubits, governed by the principles of quantum mechanics, can exist in a state of ...

How to Use Git on Linux

If you’re a developer, especially one who plans on working with a team on a project, chances are pretty good you’re going to need to use Git. This TechRepublic Premium guide, created by Jack Wallen, will walk you through the process of installing and using Git as a version control system. The guide will also ...

How to Keep a Remote Team Engaged during Meetings (Free Download)

Remote working is a fact of life, as companies provide workers with additional working options and expand around the world. Some foresight and simple changes can help keep your remote workers connected and engaged during meetings, not only making them feel like full team members of the team, but using that engagement to keep them ...

Feature Comparison: CRM Software and Services

Choosing the right customer relationship management software or service for your business requires strategy, thoughtful consideration and more than a little research. These guidelines and the accompanying worksheet, created by Mark W. Kaelin for TechRepublic Premium, will give you a customizable framework to find the best CRM solution for your needs. Featured text from the ...

Essential Support Sites for Linux Admins (Free Download)

Just because a piece of software is open source doesn’t mean there’s no support available. In fact, open-source software has plenty of available support… it’s sometimes just not in the form you’re accustomed to. This guide, written by Jack Wallen for TechRepublic Premium, looks at some of the available options for Linux. Featured text from ...

10 Steps to Ensure Debian Is Ready for Deployment

For anyone who’s considering Debian as a server option, if you’ve used Ubuntu Server, you already have a leg up on making the transition. But don’t think once you’ve installed Debian that you’re ready to send it into development or production. There are a few steps you need to take to ensure the distribution is ...

Find By Topic

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Collaboration
  • Data Centers
  • Data Management
  • Digital Transformation
  • Virtualization

TechRepublic Premium

  • More Topics 5G After Hours Amazon Android Apple Asean Australia Banking CIO50 CXO Consumerization Decade in Review Digital Health and Wellness E-Commerce EU Enterprise Software GDPR Google Google Hangout IT Policies India Internet of Things Microsoft Open source Printers Project Management SMBs Samsung Security Smart Cities Smart Office Social enterprise Software Start-Ups Tech & Work Tech Industry

Latest From TechRepublic Premium

Premium Resources

Latest from Premium

Hiring Kit: Chief Blockchain Officer

Recent Additions

Nist cybersecurity framework: a cheat sheet for professionals (free pdf).

The tech world has a problem: Security fragmentation. There’s no standard set of rules or even language for mitigating cyber risk used to address the growing threats of hackers, ransomware and stolen data, and the threat to data only continues to grow. President Barack Obama recognized the cyber threat in 2013, which led to his ...

Predictions 2024: Executive Edition

Ready or not, here comes 2024. From resilience to board priorities, Splunk executives across security, IT and engineering weigh in on what to expect in the era of AI. AI: The hype will pay off, but business impact will take another 12-24 months. C-suite transformation: CISOs, CTOs and CIOs will have expanded roles in the ...

The AI Philosophy Powering Digital Resilience

3 AI Strategies for Cybersecurity and Observability As organizations embrace dispersed architecture, grapple with an evolving threat landscape and heavily rely on digital systems, AI steps in as a promising solution to control IT chaos. But without clear guardrails that address data privacy and security concerns, we must determine how to build AI models that ...

Vix Makes Travels Safer and Smoother With Proactive Global Visibility

Vix Technology is a global leader in intelligent transportation systems, automated fare collection, and transit analytics. Transit agencies and operators — including the major transportation systems of major cities like Edmonton and Seattle — rely on Vix to help travelers process fare payments and arrive safely and on time at their destination. Previously, Vix relied ...

Observability Buyer’s Guide

This guide is for ITOps and engineering leaders and practitioners who want to lower the cost of unplanned downtime. Learn why Splunk customers like Lenovo, Puma and Rappi lean on observability as a critical solution for modern software development and discover how an observability practice can improve digital resilience. In this guide, you’ll get: An ...

Evolving From Monitoring: Why Observability Is Essential for Your Business

Faster is better, especially for businesses. Cloud-native technologies — while they deliver customer-facing applications and new features faster than ever — come with potential challenges, like complex dependencies. For every deployment, there are new potential errors, slowness or outages. Monitoring solutions have come a long way, but they often fall short in modern environments. That’s ...

Observability Predictions 2024

We’re sitting squarely at the beginning of an AI hype cycle that will cause businesses to rethink their people, processes and technology. What emerging trends do we see around the corner in the observability space? AI: AI will bring an explosion of productivity across environments, applications, microservices — as well as an uptick in data ...

Why You Need a Single Tool for Infrastructure Monitoring and APM

Now, more than ever, many organizations face immense challenges to maximize revenue. Inflation. Tighter budgets. Cost reallocations. Competitive growth opportunities. Whatever the reason, they demand highly available, customer-facing applications and services that rely on a high-performing and reliable underlying infrastructure. And they want it all without excessive spending on engineering resources. To achieve this goal, ...

State of Ecommerce in India

The ecommerce industry is hugely important to India, and opportunities abound for existing and new players alike. But amid such a competitive landscape, it’s crucial for ecommerce organisations to deliver the best possible digital experiences to those making purchases online. The State of Ecommerce in India report provides insights into the current state of the ...

State of Observability in Retail

Today, the retail industry faces new macroeconomic challenges, with the rapid increase in energy costs, high inflation, and supply chain disruptions. As the threat of shrinking margins looms, retailers are focusing on cost reduction and strategic investments to ensure the best possible business value without sacrificing the customer experience. While omnichannel is essential, retailers don’t ...

TechRepublic Premium, directly to your inbox. Sign up today.

Create a techrepublic account.

Get the web's best business technology news, tutorials, reviews, trends, and analysis—in your inbox. Let's start with the basics.

* - indicates required fields

Sign in to TechRepublic

Lost your password? Request a new password

Reset Password

Please enter your email adress. You will receive an email message with instructions on how to reset your password.

Check your email for a password reset link. If you didn't receive an email don't forgot to check your spam folder, otherwise contact support .

Welcome. Tell us a little bit about you.

This will help us provide you with customized content.

Want to receive more TechRepublic news?

You're all set.

Thanks for signing up! Keep an eye out for a confirmation email from our team. To ensure any newsletters you subscribed to hit your inbox, make sure to add [email protected] to your contacts list.

COMMENTS

  1. Strategic Procurement: A Review and Prospect

    This paper is a revised and expanded ve rsion of a paper entitled 'Emerging . ... mechanisms in procurement research (Busi and McIvor, 2008; Carter and Yan, 2007; Zeng, 2003).

  2. Capturing the value creation in public procurement: A practice-based

    The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap by analyzing the value components and means of value creation developed through public procurement activities. We conduct a systematic literature review and content analysis of 171 research articles to determine the constituents of the value of public procurement and the practices needed to achieve ...

  3. Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an

    Procurement, tools, and public sector innovation. In order to conceptualize procurement as a procedural tool, we look at the relationship between procurement and innovation through the lenses of policy tools, as scholars directed towards the idea that 'innovation-oriented public procurement is a worthy policy tool to be understood and used' (Lember et al., Citation 2014, p. 18).

  4. Services procurement: A systematic literature review of practices and

    To address this challenge and develop a strategic platform for new directions in future research in the area, this paper undertakes a systematic literature review of 51 articles published in 21 peer-reviewed academic journals. It reviews the applicability of supply theories to services sourcing, and compares and demonstrates the distinctiveness ...

  5. Project procurement management: A structured literature review

    Distribution of papers across the time and the research methodology. The first published paper in this field was a conceptual work by Smith (1973). From 1974 to 1990, no articles in this research area were published. ... Construction projects is a popular topic in the project procurement process and most papers (56%) are related to this area.

  6. Journal of Public Procurement

    The Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) is multi-disciplinary and employs a broad approach towards methods and styles of research. Public procurement refers to examining the sourcing and purchase of goods, services and works by public organisations, being national or local governments. Further, we acknowledge that:

  7. International Journal of Procurement Management

    A prescription for procurement progress. 7 June, 2024. Research in the International Journal of Procurement Management has looked at donor-funded procurement within Zimbabwe's public health medical laboratory services. The work based on a survey of 221 healthcare professionals and administrative personnel shows that operational efficiency relies mostly on strategic planning.

  8. PDF Research Perspectives on Public Procurement: Content Analysis of 14

    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, VOLUME 17, ISSUE 2, 229-269 SUMMER 2017 RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: CONTENT ANALYSIS OF 14 YEARS OF PUBLICATIONS IN THE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT Andrea Stefano Patrucco, Davide Luzzini, and Stefano Ronchi* ABSTRACT. The paper aims to evaluate the state of the literature on public

  9. Critical Review of Procurement Method Research in ...

    Through selected papers from well-known academic journals in construction management, detailed coverage of these issues is systematically reviewed with the aim to investigate the state of the art and trends in procurement research. The outcome of this paper may provide a platform for both researchers and industrial practitioners to appreciate ...

  10. Sustainable Procurement Practice: The Effect of Procurement ...

    Effective implementation and committed practice of sustainable procurement remain a significant challenge for many organisations across the globe. This paper sought to understand the extent to which employees' perceptions influence the practice of sustainable procurement in the context of a developing country where sustainability awareness is low. Drawing on the Diffusion of Innovation ...

  11. Procurement process risk and performance: empirical evidence from

    Purpose. This paper employs the positivism paradigm, quantitative approach and explanatory research design. It analyses primary data obtained from manufacturing firms via structured questionnaires and uses the partial least square-structural equation modelling technique to establish the effect of individual procurement process risk on procurement performance.

  12. Literature Review and Research Issues in e-Procurement

    This paper looks into prior research on interorganizational information systems (IOIS), electronic data interchange (EDI), channel management and procurement to develop a research framework and identify research issues in e-Procurement defining important terms such as volume, width and depth of e-Procurement and classifying the ownership and ...

  13. procurement process Latest Research Papers

    This article discusses issues related to the effectiveness of the use of federal budget funds, provides references to legislative and regulatory acts related to the issue under study, forms an algorithm for the stages of the procurement process, highlights the distinctive features and characteristics of public procurement in the institution of the zrdavookhraneniya system (on the example of ...

  14. PDF Effects of Procurement Practices on Organizational Performance ...

    A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF AFRICA AUGUST, 2017 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE

  15. Publications and Research Reports

    Research Papers. NIGP provides practical and useful research findings to help procurement professionals in their everyday decision making. 2023 NIGP Workforce Competency Study. In January 2023, NIGP initiated this project aimed at identifying and mapping the continuing education needs of its members. Two primary questions guided the research:

  16. PDF Procurement Practices and Organizational ...

    Most of the respondents (50%) were found to. within the age bracket of 36 - 45 years. 52.9 percent of the respondents in the. procurement department at the University of Nairobi had undergraduate degrees while. 26.5 percent of the employees interviewed had attained postgraduate degree. 38.2% of.

  17. Public Procurement Research Papers

    The UK must protect itself against the types of risk that arise from this ongoing transformation in the interface between the state and the private sector. To assist this process, this paper sets out to identify some key risk areas in UK public procurement and to make recommendations for reform and further research.

  18. Procurement and Supply Chain Management Research Papers/Topics

    20. 21. ». 1 - 15 Of 309 Results. Browse through books in Procurement and Supply Chain Management. Access and download complete Procurement and Supply Chain Management books, Procurement and Supply Chain Management text books, book reviews etc. Book reviews in Procurement and Supply Chain Management - Page 1.

  19. About The Procurement Imperative

    The Procurement Imperative, commissioned by SAP and developed by Economist Impact, aims to expand on the paradigms explored in the first two years and seeks to assess the evolving function of procurement from a risk management, supplier engagement, external workforce management, collaboration and technology and sustainability adoption standpoint.

  20. FAR

    FAC Number Effective Date HTML DITA PDF Word EPub Apple Books Kindle; 2024-05: 05/22/2024

  21. Resource Library

    TechRepublic Resource Library. IT white papers, webcasts, case studies, and much more - all free to registered TechRepublic members. Find Search or Browse our extensive library; Download Free ...

  22. People

    A global community. A global. community. We're a group of 3,000 researchers inventing what's next in computing at labs across the world. Learn more about us and our work below. Filter by.