dog gender reassignment surgery

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Experience: my dog underwent gender reassignment surgery

Molly seemed like a perfectly normal female pup at first. It was only when she started taking walks outside that we noticed unusual behaviour

T he death of our collie Bonnie in 2006 hit my husband Frank and me so hard that it was almost a decade before we considered taking on another dog. But, late in 2015, my daughter mentioned that a friend of hers had a jack russell that was about to have pups. Familiar with female dogs, we decided that if there were any bitches in the litter we would take one. That’s how we ended up with Molly.

Picking her up involved a round trip of about 200 miles, but it was love at first sight. She was a tiny wee doggy, only 11in long and 6in high, and she weighed about a kilo and a half. She had delicate features – very feminine-looking.

We registered Molly at the local vet and made sure she had all her jabs. It was only when she started taking walks outside at about three months old that we noticed peculiarities in her behaviour.

Indoors, when Molly needed to pee, she would squat on her training mat as she had been taught, but when Frank took her out he noticed that she cocked her leg like a boy dog. We had spotted before that she had a tiny appendage between her back legs, but we thought little of it until we noticed that it sometimes seemed to cause her discomfort when she tried to sit down.

We took Molly to the vet to get it looked at. After examining her, the vet said: “I’m going to have a senior colleague look at this,” and took Molly into a back room. I was reminded of Bonnie’s diagnosis with stomach cancer and feared the worst. When the vet came back and said she thought Molly could be a hermaphrodite, I didn’t realise what she meant; I started crying, assuming she was referring to another form of cancer. But she said: “No, it means Molly has male and female genitalia.” I was flabbergasted; I had never heard anything like it. But we were assured that Molly’s condition could be fixed, although we would have to wait until she was older and stronger.

In the meantime, Molly started to behave more like a male dog, mounting cushions and soft toys, although this often left her sore and unhappy. When she was six months old, we took her back to the vet, where a senior practitioner, Ross Allan , examined her. X-rays and other tests confirmed his suspicions – Molly was an intersex dog. In fact, she was most likely genetically male, meaning she was a male pseudohermaphrodite . She had a small vestigial penis within what looked like a female vulva and testicles inside her abdomen that hadn’t descended.

Molly’s condition was very rare. About one in 6,800 dogs born are pseudohermaphrodites. In 15 years of practice, Ross had never encountered another case, nor had any of his more senior colleagues. Sometimes no operation is needed, but Ross explained that Molly’s complications were likely to increase as she aged. Well-meaning friends had already suggested it might be kinder to have her put down, because she was often visibly distressed. The thought horrified us. However, Ross reassured us that an operation would make her life much easier.

The day she went into theatre was very stressful. Ross said: “Call me in the morning.” I didn’t sleep a wink that night, thinking about Molly and fearing the worst. But we were able to take her home the next day. Ross had removed the partly formed penis and testicles, which were at risk of becoming cancerous, and created an opening for Molly’s urethra so she could pee comfortably. She was exhausted the first day back and lay at the end of our bed, crying. When we spotted blood, we rushed her back to the vet, where she ended up spending a few more days being treated with drugs and antibiotics.

Twenty months on, she’s a cheeky little dog, full of character. She’s still unmistakably our Molly, whatever her genetic makeup. When our grandchildren visit, she jumps all over them and licks their ears; she’s clearly much happier than she was before the operation. She still loves her soft toys, too – just not in the same way.

As told to Chris Broughton

Do you have an experience to share? Email [email protected]

Comments (…)

Most viewed.

• Weird But True
• Sex & Relationships
• Viral Trends
• Human Interest
• Fashion & Beauty
• Food & Drink

trending now in Lifestyle

The one shocking mistake that led to a US tourist's staggering...

Brazilian woman brazenly wheels elderly man's corpse into bank to...

Mom 'terrified' to discover baby she was caring for in hospital...

Bride defends ‘rude’ wedding attire rule

Top 10 states with longest work commutes revealed — no. 1 may....

Inside a 'radical' 20-person polyamorous relationship where wild...

Dear Abby: My husband's best friend is dating his niece

I’m a dietitian — here’s the secret to intermittent fasting

Dog born with male, female sex organs undergoes gender surgery.

Thanks for contacting us. We've received your submission.

An award-winning vet in Scotland has performed a sex swap on a confused Jack Russell Terrier born with both male and female sex organs.

Molly’s owner took her pet along to the Pets n’ Vets Family’s Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in the city’s Southside when she became concerned about her strange behavior.

Molly’s excited behavior was causing the pooch discomfort and abrasions.

But after a successful operation, the pet is said to be much happier.

Despite the surgery, Molly’s owner Mary Finlay revealed that the pooch still cocks her leg like a boy when she pees.

Speaking from her home in Glasgow, Mary said: “Molly still does that. It’s taken a little longer to toilet train her but she’s not been affected by it at all. She still knows she’s a girl doggy though.”

Vet Ross Allan explained: “Molly was what is defined medically as a male pseudo hermaphrodite or more commonly ‘intersex’.

“Her particular anatomy meant that whilst Molly appeared to be a female, closer examination revealed elements of both male and female external genitalia and unfortunately this was leading to significant genital discomfort.

“If left untreated this risked her developing a long-term and debilitating condition.

“We decided that the very best solution for Molly was to proceed with definitive surgery to create an anatomical situation which would avoid ongoing issues or discomfort.”

During the surgical procedure, Allan found that Molly’s internal sexual organs were that of a male, possessing testicles in the place of ovaries within her abdomen.

The complex surgical procedure involved removing her pseudo male sexual organ and forming a functional urethral opening where the female genitalia would normally be found.

Allan added: “The surgery was a great success and Molly is much more comfortable and happier as a result.

“Intersexism is rare in pets, and some cases will not require any treatment at all.

“In Molly’s case it was a painful condition which was causing problems and surgery was an important step to ensure she was able to go on to live a pain-free life.”

Molly’s owner said it took a long time for her to recover from the extensive surgery but praised vet Ross, who won the 2017 BSAVA Melton Award for contributions to small animal practice.

She added: “She was tiny and was only six months old when she had the surgery.

“When we got her back she was so tired, her wee face was drawn and she was shattered.

“Without people like Ross, wee doggies like Molly would be put down.”

Share this article:

Jump to content

American Urological Association

You are here, single port surgery (2012 svl), v2160: gender reassignment surgery. male to female. technique.

• Return to Course Home
• Return to Parent Home

Funding: none

Course navigation

You are not yet complete for this activity.

If you are attending a virtual event or viewing video content, you must meet the minimum participation requirement to proceed.

When the virtual event or video content is complete, please press "Next" again.

If you think this message was received in error, please contact an administrator.

Hermaphrodite dog fully recovered after sex-change surgery

Vets operated on Jack Russell puppy Molly because she had testicles in place of ovaries and male and female external genitalia.

By Russell Hope, News Reporter

Tuesday 25 April 2017 18:37, UK

An "intersex" dog born with male and female genitals has made a full recovery after having rare gender reassignment surgery.

Molly, a Jack Russell puppy, was taken to a vet when her owners, Mary and Frank Finlay, noticed she would get excited before going to the toilet and squat to pee in their home, but lift her leg outside.

Vet Ross Allan discovered that, despite appearing to be completely female, she was a male pseudo hermaphrodite or "intersex" as it is more commonly known, with elements of both male and female external genitalia.

"Her particular anatomy meant that whilst Molly appeared to be a female, closer examination revealed elements of both male and female external genitalia, and unfortunately this was leading to significant genital discomfort," he said.

During "complex" surgery at the Pets'n'Vets Family's Roundhouse Hospital in Glasgow last June, Mr Allan found Molly had male internal sexual organs, with testicles in the place of ovaries within her abdomen.

He removed her pseudo male sexual organs and formed a functional urethral opening where the female genitalia would normally be found.

Mr Allan said Molly's condition is rare. He said: "She is certainly unique to me.

More from UK

Politics latest: Lords set to try and pass further changes to Rwanda bill; Tory MP who made Angela Rayner police complaint faces awkward questions

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt insists UK's economy has 'turned corner' - telling public to 'stick to plan' for 'better times'

Children playing at Salford nature reserve where body part was later found may have crucial information, police say

"She was four months old when Mary and Frank first brought her in after they noticed her displaying quite masculine behaviour...rubbing herself against furniture, causing discomfort and abrasions to her skin.

"If left untreated, this risked her developing a long-term and debilitating condition.

"We decided that the very best solution for Molly was to proceed with definitive surgery to create an anatomical situation which would avoid ongoing issues or discomfort.

"The surgery was a great success and Molly is much more comfortable and happier as a result."

Mrs Finlay told BBC Scotland's Kaye Adams programme: "We've seen no change in her behaviour. She's still the same wee Molly and we wouldn't be without her, she's too precious."

Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK Edition Change

• UK Politics
• News Videos
• Paris 2024 Olympics
• Rugby Union
• Sport Videos
• John Rentoul
• Mary Dejevsky
• Andrew Grice
• Sean O’Grady
• Photography
• Theatre & Dance
• Culture Videos
• Food & Drink
• Health & Families
• Royal Family
• Electric Vehicles
• Car Insurance deals
• Lifestyle Videos
• UK Hotel Reviews
• News & Advice
• Simon Calder
• Australia & New Zealand
• South America
• C. America & Caribbean
• Middle East
• Politics Explained
• News Analysis
• Today’s Edition
• Home & Garden
• Broadband deals
• Fashion & Beauty
• Travel & Outdoors
• Sports & Fitness
• Sustainable Living
• Climate Videos
• Solar Panels
• Behind The Headlines
• On The Ground
• Decomplicated
• You Ask The Questions
• Binge Watch
• Travel Smart
• Watch on your TV
• Crosswords & Puzzles
• Most Commented
• Newsletters
• Ask Me Anything
• Virtual Events
• Betting Sites
• Online Casinos
• Wine Offers

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in Please refresh your browser to be logged in

Intersex pet dog undergoes gender reassignment surgery

Jack russell molly's owners became concerned when they say she started to behave like a male , article bookmarked.

Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile

Get the free Morning Headlines email for news from our reporters across the world

Sign up to our free morning headlines email, thanks for signing up to the morning headlines email.

An intersex dog born with both male and female genitals has successfully recovered from a rare gender reassignment surgery.

Molly, a Jack Russell terrier puppy, was taken to the vet when her owners Frank and Mary Finlay noticed she was behaving strangely when going to the toilet, sometimes lifting her leg and other times squatting to pee.

The couple bought Molly in 2015 believing she was a female but became concerned about what they felt was increasingly male behaviour.

• Patients evacuated as fire closes cancer unit at Manchester hospital
• Teenager kept in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day at UK jail
• Japanese princess Kako of Akishono to attend University of Leeds
• British 'hacker' Lauri Love can appeal extradition to US

Upon examination by Glasgow vet Ross Allan, it appeared Molly had both female genitalia and male testicles - which had not descended - and a poorly-formed “vestigial” penis, BBC Scotland reports.

Mr Allan told the couple Molly’s hermaphrodite nature explained her genital discomfort.

Mr Allan told BBC Scotland's Kaye Adams Programme Molly’s condition was “extremely rare” and that neither him nor his colleagues had come across it before.

“In the literature there have been about 15 cases published in total. In 15 years of doing this job I have seen this in Molly and in no other dog at all," he said.

The vet operated on Molly, when she was six months old. He removed her male genitals and formed a functional urethral opening where the female genitalia would normally be found.

"She actually had the female external genitalia, as it were, but in the male formation,” said Mr Allan.

The vet said that without the operation, Molly’s problems would have exacerbated over time and could have developed into a debilitating condition.

Nearly a year on from the operation, he said Molly had made a full recovery and was happy in her home.

“Molly is Molly and she is happy and fit and healthy, that is the main thing,” said Mr Allan.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article

Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.

New to The Independent?

Or if you would prefer:

Want an ad-free experience?

Hi {{indy.fullName}}

• My Independent Premium
• Account details
• Help centre

• Skip to main content
• Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

The Protojournalist

The 'sex change' operation for cats.

Linton Weeks

Like a circus parade, the cutting-edge pet stories just keep coming.

Plastic surgery for dogs. Designer kitties — poodle cats and jungle hybrids . Medicinal marijuana for ailing pets.

Can gender reassignment for pets be far behind? Actually, some veterinarians, like Christie Cornelius of Houston, do talk about "sex change" operations for cats.

The surgery, says Cornelius, of Last Wishes , is not a true "sex reassignment" because "it is not performed for the purpose of changing a cat's sex."

Ann Staub, a former vet and now keeper of the Pawsitively Pets blog, explains: The procedure — conducted on a male cat suffering from persistent urinary problems — is technically called a "perineal urethrostomy," but in her office and in other veterinary clinics, it's often referred to as a "sex change."

Because, Staub says, "it's easier to say and remember. Sometimes we have to humor ourselves at work, too."

Without getting too graphic, the operation involves removal of a tom's cathood, a shortening of the urethra and the creation of a new opening that is similar to a female cat's. "I don't know for sure," Staub says, "but this doesn't seem to have any effect on a cat's personality, as most of them are already neutered anyways."

Do owners ever decide to change their pets' gender for other reasons? Staub says she "can't imagine a veterinarian actually doing a 'sex change' surgery to an animal for cosmetic purposes, but I'm sure there's someone out there who's willing to make a buck."

After all, she adds, she has heard about people "using Botox on wrinkly dogs like Shar-Peis for medical reasons. I don't have any experience with that personally, though."

Transgender dog saved by surgery

Share this:.

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)
• Things to Do

A Pomeranian puppy found wandering San Bernardino streets and born with partially formed male and female reproductive organs has been saved from possible euthanasia after one woman’s donation allowed for a $1,165 gender reassignment surgery.

Red, as the dog is being called until it is adopted, needed the surgery to prevent infection and reduce the risk of developing cancer.

Now — thanks to the surgery performed by a veterinary specialist from Orange County — Red is without any reproductive organs, healthy and ready for adoption.

The condition is so rare that published data do not include an estimated percentage of the pet population with the condition. Veterinarians see it once in a 30-year-old career, if at all, said San Bernardino veterinarian Marc DiCarlo. In humans, it occurs in three out of 100,000 people.

“I just felt he was a very adoptable dog,” said Sharon Blechinger, director of the Helping Every Animal League, a nonprofit support group that helps pay for vaccinations at the San Bernardino shelter.

Blechinger paid for Red’s surgery out of her own pocket, because the organization couldn’t afford it and because the dog “is in this position through no fault of its own. I didn’t want them to put the dog to sleep.”

Red was brought to the San Bernardino City Animal Shelter about a month ago by someone who found him wandering the streets. No one has claimed him.

Ryan Long, a kennel supervisor at the shelter, described the dog as bright, alert and responsive when he first examined him. But he said upon examination, Red did not look anatomically correct.

Di Carlo diagnosed the dog as a pseudo-male hermaphrodite. Genetically male, the pooch was born with partially formed male and female parts.

Shelter workers then contacted Blechinger, who arranged for a foster home for Red and paid for his surgery.

Patti Harris, a scheduling coordinator whose own Pomeranian died in June, was contacted by Blechinger, and allowed Red to move in with her temporarily about a week and a half ago.

Last Friday, James Felts, a veterinary specialist from Orange County who was told about Red by DiCarlo, performed the 90-minute surgical procedure.

And now he’s recovering in his temporary home.

Harris bought him an inflatable collar to keep him from chewing on his stitches, which come out a week from Monday.

“I think he sleeps most of the day while I’m away,” she said.

When she comes home, she lets him out into a small backyard to play. They go on short walks together.

They sit side-by-side on a sofa in the evening watching television.

“He likes to watch ‘Animal Planet,’ ” Harris said, giggling.

Red is less than a year old and Harris wants to get an older Pomeranian.

Meanwhile, “He’s my transition dog. It will be hard to part with him, but I’m gone all day and him being so young, it doesn’t seem fair to him to keep him.”

To inquire about helping with the cost of his surgery or adopting Red, contact HEAL at 909-436-8065.

Reach Darrell R. Santschi at 951-368-9484 or [email protected]

The Helping Every Animal League is a nonprofit support group for the San Bernardino City Animal Shelter. It raises money to pay for vaccinations of stray animals not funded by the city.

Web site: http://friendsofheal.org

Phone: 909-436-8065

Contact HEAL director: [email protected]

• Newsroom Guidelines
• Report an Error

More in News

National News | Virginia becomes first Southern state to abolish child marriage

Business | Dozens of Google employees protest use of company’s tech for war in Gaza

World News | UN appeals for $2.8 billion to help 3 million Palestinians in desperate need of food and other aid

Things To Do | Free National Park Day is coming on Saturday, April 20

Gender Reassignment Surgery Saves Puppy

Red the "very adoptable dog" is recovering after gender reassignment surgery, by jonathan lloyd • published august 6, 2010 • updated on august 6, 2010 at 5:10 pm.

Red the Pomeranian puppy is recovering after a gender reassignment surgery saved the dog from euthanasia. According to a report in the Press-Enterprise , the dog was born with partially formed male and female reproductive organs. It's a rare condition among dogs. But thanks to a woman's donation of more than $1,100, Red was able to undergo a life-saving gender reassignment surgery. "I just felt he was a very adoptable dog," Sharon Blechinger , director of the Helping Every Animal League , told the Press-Enterprise. She paid for the surgery after Red was found roaming the streets in San Bernardino . According to the PE's report:

Ryan Long , a kennel supervisor at the shelter, described the dog as bright, alert and responsive when he first examined him. But he said upon examination, Red did not look anatomically correct. Di Carlo diagnosed the dog as a pseudo-male hermaphrodite. Genetically male, the pooch was born with partially formed male and female parts. Shelter workers then contacted Blechinger, who arranged for a foster home for Red and paid for his surgery.

Red moved in with a woman whose Pomeranian died in June, the PE reported. The dog is now recovering at a temporary home.

• Advocate Newsletter

Search form

By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use .

Gender Reassignment Surgery Saves Dog 

A Pomeranian puppy born with partially formed male and female reproductive organs has been saved from euthanasia after undergoing gender reassignment surgery.

Red the Pomeranian would have been put to sleep, but a woman donated the $1,100 needed to pay for the lifesaving surgery. "I just felt he was a very adoptable dog," Sharon Blechinger, director of the Helping Every Animal League, told The Press-Enterprise of Riverside, Calif. Red was taken into the shelter after he was found roaming the streets in San Bernardino. Genetically male, a shelter supervisor says Red was born with partially formed male and female organs. Red is recovering from the surgery in a temporary home, after which Blechinger will help to arrange for his adoption.

Want more breaking equality news & trending entertainment stories?

Check out our NEW 24/7 streaming service: the Advocate Channel!

Download the Advocate Channel App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!

APPLE STORE - GOOGLE PLAY

ROKU - APPLE TV - FIRE TV - GOOGLE TV

From our Sponsors

Most popular.

Here Are Our 2024 Election Predictions. Will They Come True?

17 celebs who are out & proud of their trans & nonbinary kids, here are the 15 most lgbtq-friendly cities in the u.s., which state is the queerest these are the states with the most lgbtq+ people, these 27 senate hearing room gay sex jokes are truly exquisite, 10 cheeky and homoerotic photos from bob mizer's nude films, 42 flaming hot photos from 2024's australian firefighters calendar, these are the 5 states with the smallest percentage of lgbtq+ people, here are the 15 gayest travel destinations in the world: report, 13 lgbtq+ british royals in history, latest stories, kentucky couldn't pass a single anti-lgbtq+ bill this session — and it's not alone, west virginia can’t ban transgender athletes says federal court, there have already been 4,000 instances of book banning in america this school year: report, many trans americans are living in fear. but lgbtq+ advocates see a reprieve in statehouses, sean cody model and gay adult film actor sentenced for murdering alaskan surgeon, hillary clinton and kelly clarkson condemn arizona ruling upholding 1864 abortion ban, a republican mom and her transgender son open up about unconditional love and acceptance, supreme court lets idaho enforce law criminalizing gender-affirming care for minors, gay fetish artist rex has died — see some of his sexy work, kansas governor passes law requiring id to view acts of 'homosexuality' online, vetoes anti-lgbtq+ bill, missouri attorney general can obtain information on planned parenthood's trans health care, court rules, an owasso high school graduate is exposing anti-lgbtq+ bullying after nex benedict's death, brittney griner and her wife cherelle are expecting here's when baby griner is arriving, federal judge tosses challenge trying to protect anti-transgender ban by new york county officials, tennessee senate passes bill making 'recruiting' for trans youth care a felony, italy’s prime minister says surrogacy ‘inhuman’ as party backs steeper penalties, 'reacher' star alan ritchson's scathing takedown of trump is the best thing we've read all day, 'x-men '97's creator opens up about how pulse & other real-world tragedies inspired the latest episode, after decades of silent protest, advocates and students speak out for lgbtq+ rights, 11 celebs who love their lgbtq+ siblings, trending stories.

San Francisco – safe, authentic, and on a budget

How climate disasters hurt mental health in young people

​'Chucky' creator on why taking Devon & Jake’s love story to the next level was ‘transformative’​

Tia Kofi is ready to rule the world & long may she reign!

Writing helped save one queer poet's life—now he wants to help others feel seen & heard

Discover Dublin: your gay guide to the Emerald City’s best-kept secrets

'​Fallout' is a wonderfully weird, funny & bold post-apocalyptic tale — but is it queer?

These are the 10 most challenged books of 2023

France becomes world’s first country to enshrine abortion rights in constitution

Matt Rogers has an update on a ‘Fire Island’ sequel & we’re SHAKING

Homophobes are BIG MAD that Justin Bieber & Jaden Smith were affectionate at Coachella

'The People's Joker' will make you rethink everything you know about superhero movies

Johnny Sibilly reacts to new 'Station 19' role & working with Peter Paige (exclusive)

All 6 rogue Mississippi cops got long prison sentences in 'Goon Squad' torture of 2 Black men

8 dating tips for gay men from a gay therapist

Elon Musk uses burner accounts on X, doesn’t fact-check: report

Ötzi, the world’s oldest mummified hiker, gets a thirsty new reveal

Nashville PD Must Pay HIV-Positive Man Denied a Job

Why are mpox cases in the U.S. on the rise again?

Mean Girls' Daniel Franzese on playing an HIV+ character

Joe Biden has tied the record for most LGBTQ+ judges confirmed in federal courts

Gay man loses job in U.S. but finds sweet chocolaty success in Spain

'Chucky' star Jennifer Tilly on Tiffany’s chaotic Sapphic era & why we love her anyway

15 iconic looks that prove Zendaya & Law Roach NEVER miss

Exclusive: British gay man ‘tortured’ in Qatar is almost out of HIV medicine, family says

Most recent.

Unleash your wild side with The Pride Store’s beginner’s guide to kink

Before AIDS, gay artist Rex drew hot men on the prowl — then he disappeared

Unlocking a new level of beauty with Dr Botanicals' ethical skincare line

Celebrate 40 days of Pride on West Hollywood’s 40th anniversary

Discover endless fun at The Pride Store: Games & electronics for all ages

Billie Eilish kissed a girl at Coachella & we're FREAKING OUT

Former 'RHOP' star Candiace Dillard Bassett is trading Bravo for baby, announces pregnancy

Federal judge grants Casa Ruby founder Ruby Corado pre-trial release from D.C. jail

Joe Biden launches ‘Out for Biden-Harris’ campaign initiative to engage & woo LGBTQ+ voters (exclusive)

Opinion: I'm a climate scientist. If you knew what I know, you'd be terrified too

Diplo showed off his bare ass & we really want to lean on it

16 Republican AGs threaten Maine over protections for trans care and abortion

Giselle Byrd is taking center stage — and helping others do the same

Rapper NLE Choppa shows love to LGBTQ+ fans, claps back at haters

Wrestling stud Anthony Bowens stuns in sweaty & steamy gym selfie

Election season got you down? This crisis line is soothing LGBTQ+ mental health

Eclipse Viewing: Best and Worst Weather Conditions in U.S.

HIV-positive Air Force, Navy servicemembers victorious in lawsuit

George Santos posted 'model' photos and the reactions are RUTHLESS

Meet Avery Wilson — the self-proclaimed 'talented, tall, sexy' man playing Scarecrow in 'The Wiz'

Drake diss track: Swifties would like to be excluded from this narrative!

This morning was PURE CHAOS in the Bravo universe

14 Coachella moments that prove Sapphics are absolutely WINNING

Recommended stories for you, advocate.com editors.

Culture Rot Update: “My Dog Underwent Gender Reassignment Surgery”

The left is so insane that it’s hard to believe something so mental and disturbing would become a new “norm.” where are all the leftist “animal rights” activists is this not animal abuse.

The Guardian has been notorious for its gruesome articles; for instance, one that was recently published responding to the impending death of Charlie Gard by  saying  “children do not belong to their parents.”

The Guardian’s most recent idiocy was published on the topic of gender reassignment surgery, following President Trump’s  ban  on transgender military members.

In an  interview  with The Guardian’s Chris Broughton, Mary Finlay tells the story of how her Jack Russell Terrier underwent gender reassignment surgery and now identifies as a female dog, “Molly.”

“She’s still unmistakably our Molly, whatever her genetic makeup,” Finlay tells the Guardian. “When our grandchildren visit, she jumps all over them and licks their ears; she’s clearly much happier than she was before the operation. She still loves her soft toys, too – just not in the same way.”

Molly was born a “male pseudohermaphrodite,” which means the dog was genetically male but had genitals that looked like female genitals. The dog’s penis hadn’t fully grown outside of what looked like a female vulva, and the testicles inside his abdomen hadn’t fully descended.

The Finlays, having just suffered the death of a previous female puppy, were eager to accept a new female dog into the family. However, they confused Molly for a female dog at first.

“She was a tiny wee doggy, only 11in long and 6in high, and she weighed about a kilo and a half. She had delicate features – very feminine-looking,” Mary tells The Guardian, adding her dog would “squat” on her training mat when she needed to pee.

Her husband Frank, however, noticed that the dog cocked her leg “like a boy dog” and seemed to be uncomfortable sitting down. Moreover, Molly displayed other male-like behaviors, such as “mounting cushions and soft toys.”

Since Molly’s condition put her at risk of developing cancer, the Finlays took her to the vet to have her penis and testicles removed, creating an opening for her bladder so that she could pee comfortably.

It has been a year since Molly’s operation.

http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/07/933509-guardian-feature-dog-underwent-gender-reassignment-surgery/

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/jul/28/my-dog-molly-underwent-gender-reassignment-surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Real-Life Person Claims Her Dog Had Gender-Reassignment Surgery

Dogs, hold onto your kibbles and bits. 

Molly is a two-year-old Jack Russell Terrier who is also transgender. Yes, you read that right: a transgender dog. It is no longer enough for progressive parents to push gender fluidity on their children -- now, we have people questioning the gender identity of their dogs.

This is 2017. 

Before we get started here, I want to assure you that this story is 100 percent real. It was published on the U.K. website The Guardian this morning with the title,  "Experience: my dog underwent gender reassignment surgery."

The subheading gets even better: "Molly seemed like a perfectly normal female pup at first. It was only when she started taking walks outside that we noticed unusual behaviour." 

Molly's owner is a real-life U.K. resident named Mary Finlay, who dictated the story of Molly's surgery to a reporter. 

In fairness, poor Molly is a pseudohermaphrodite, which means that she was born with extra male genitalia even though she is a girl dog. This condition happens to about 6,800 every year and is extremely rare. There is a medical necessity for this to get...um...fixed. 

However, the sheer ridiculousness with which Molly's owners talk about her new "identity" is doggone crazy: 

She’s still unmistakably our Molly, whatever her genetic makeup. When our grandchildren visit, she jumps all over them and licks their ears; she’s clearly much happier than she was before the operation. She still loves her soft toys, too – just not in the same way.

Rather than describing their dog's medical condition as a rare yet known genetic deformity that needed to be surgically fixed, Molly's owners have projected human sexuality and gender "identity" onto their dog.

She is a dog. 

Best wishes to Molly, though! I hope getting her extra parts removed has made it easier for her to do things like chase squirrels and catch dinner scraps. 

Thank you for supporting MRCTV! As a tax-deductible, charitable organization, we rely on the support of our readers to keep us running!  Keep MRCTV going with your gift here!

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychiatry

Readiness assessments for gender-affirming surgical treatments: A systematic scoping review of historical practices and changing ethical considerations

Travis amengual.

1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States

Kaitlyn Kunstman

R. brett lloyd, aron janssen.

2 The Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

Annie B. Wescott

3 Galter Health Science Library, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States

Associated Data

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/ Supplementary material , further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) are terms that refer to individuals whose gender identity differs from sex assigned at birth. TGD individuals may choose any variety of modifications to their gender expression including, but not limited to changing their name, clothing, or hairstyle, starting hormones, or undergoing surgery. Starting in the 1950s, surgeons and endocrinologists began treating what was then known as transsexualism with cross sex hormones and a variety of surgical procedures collectively known as sex reassignment surgery (SRS). Soon after, Harry Benjamin began work to develop standards of care that could be applied to these patients with some uniformity. These guidelines, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), are in their 8th iteration. Through each iteration there has been a requirement that patients requesting gender-affirming hormones (GAH) or gender-affirming surgery (GAS) undergo one or more detailed evaluations by a mental health provider through which they must obtain a “letter of readiness,” placing mental health providers in the role of gatekeeper. WPATH specifies eligibility criteria for gender-affirming treatments and general guidelines for the content of letters, but does not include specific details about what must be included, leading to a lack of uniformity in how mental health providers approach performing evaluations and writing letters. This manuscript aims to review practices related to evaluations and letters of readiness for GAS in adults over time as the standards of care have evolved via a scoping review of the literature. We will place a particular emphasis on changing ethical considerations over time and the evolution of the model of care from gatekeeping to informed consent. To this end, we did an extensive review of the literature. We identified a trend across successive iterations of the guidelines in both reducing stigma against TGD individuals and shift in ethical considerations from “do no harm” to the core principle of patient autonomy. This has helped reduce barriers to care and connect more people who desire it to gender affirming care (GAC), but in these authors’ opinions does not go far enough in reducing barriers.

Introduction

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) are terms that refer to any individual whose gender identity is different from their sex assigned at birth. Gender identity can be expressed through any combination of name, pronouns, hairstyle, clothing, and social role. Some TGD individuals wish to transition medically by taking gender-affirming hormones (GAH) and/or pursuing gender-affirming surgery (GAS) ( 1 ). 1 The medical community’s comfort level with TGD individuals and, consequently, their willingness to provide a broad range of gender affirming care (GAC) 2 has changed significantly over time alongside an increasing understanding of what it means to be TGD and increasing cultural acceptance of LGBTQI people.

Historically physicians have placed significant barriers in the way of TGD people accessing the care that we now know to be lifesaving. Even today, patients wishing to receive GAC must navigate a system that sometimes requires multiple mental health evaluations for procedures, that is not required of cisgender individuals.

The medical and psychiatric communities have used a variety of terms over time to refer to TGD individuals. The first and second editions of DSM described TGD individuals using terms such as transvestism (TV) and transsexualism (TS), and often conflated gender identity with sexuality, by including them alongside diagnoses such as homosexuality and paraphilias. Both the DSM and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) have continuously changed diagnostic terminology and criteria involving TGD individuals over time, from Gender Identity Disorder in DSM-IV to Gender Dysphoria in DSM-5 to Gender Incongruence in ICD-11.

In 1979, the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association 3 , renamed the World Profession Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) in 2006, was the first to publish international guidelines for providing GAC to TGD individuals. The WPATH Standards of Care (SOC) are used by many insurance companies and surgeons to determine an individual’s eligibility for GAC. Throughout each iteration, mental health providers are placed in the role of gatekeeper and tasked with conducting mental health evaluations and providing required letters of readiness for TGD individuals who request GAC ( 1 ). As part of this review, we will summarize the available literature examining the practical and ethical changes in conducting mental health readiness assessments and writing the associated letters.

While the WPATH guidelines specify eligibility criteria for GAC and a general guide for what information to include in a letter of readiness, there are no widely agreed upon standardized letter templates or semi-structured interviews, leading to a variety of practices in evaluation and letter writing for GAC ( 2 ). To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review to summarize the available research to date regarding the evolution of the mental health evaluation and process of writing letters of readiness for GAS. By summarizing trends in these evaluations over time, we aim to identify best practices and help further guide mental health professionals working in this field.

The review authors conducted a comprehensive search of the literature in collaboration with a research librarian (ABW) according to PRISMA guidelines. The search was comprised of database-specific controlled vocabulary and keyword terms for (1) mental health and (2) TGD-related surgeries. Searches were conducted on December 2, 2020 in MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library Databases (Wiley), PsychINFO (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus (Elsevier), and Dissertations and Theses Global (ProQuest). All databases were searched from inception to present without the use of limits or filters. In total, 8,197 results underwent multi-pass deduplication in a citation management system (EndNote), and 4,411 unique entries were uploaded to an online screening software (Rayyan) for title/abstract screening by two independent reviewers. In total, 303 articles were included for full text screening ( Figure 1 ), however, 69 of those articles were excluded as they were unable to be obtained online or through interlibrary loan. Both review authors conducted a full text screen of the remaining 234 articles. Articles were included in the final review if they specified criteria used for mental health screening/evaluation and/or letter writing for GAS, focused on TGD adults, were written in English, and were peer-reviewed publications. Any discrepancies were discussed between the two review authors TA and KK and a consensus was reached. A total of 86 articles met full inclusion criteria. Full documentation of all searches can be found in the Supplementary material .

PRISMA flow diagram demonstrating article review process.

In total, 86 articles were included for review. Eleven articles were focused on ethical considerations while the remaining 75 articles focused on the mental health evaluation and process of writing letters of readiness for GAS. Version 8 of the SOC was published in September of 2022 during the review process of this manuscript and is also included as a reference and point of discussion.

Prior to the publication of the standards of care

Fourteen articles were identified in the literature search as published prior to the development of the WPATH SOC version 1 in 1979. Prominent themes included classification, categorization, and diagnosis of TS. Few publications described the components of a mental health evaluation, and inclusion and exclusion criteria, for GAS. Many publications focused exclusively on transgender females, with a paucity of literature examining the experiences of transgender males during this timeframe.

Authors emphasized accurate diagnosis of TS, highlighting elements of the psychosocial history including early life cross-dressing, preference for play with the opposite gender toys and friends, and social estrangement around puberty ( 3 ). One author proposed the term gender dysphoria syndrome, which included the following criteria: a sense of inappropriateness in one’s anatomically congruent sex role, that role reversal would lead to improvement in discomfort, homoerotic interest and heterosexual inhibition, an active desire for surgical intervention, and the patient taking on an active role in exploring their interest in sex reassignment ( 4 ). Many authors attempted to differentiate between the “true transsexual” and other diagnoses, including idiopathic TS; idiopathic, essential, or obligatory homosexuality; neuroticism; TV; schizophrenia; and intersex individuals ( 5 , 6 ).

Money argued that the selection criteria for patients requesting GAS include a psychiatric evaluation to obtain collateral information to confirm the accuracy of the interview, work with the family to foster support of the individual, and proper management of any psychiatric comorbidities ( 5 ). Authors began to assemble a list of possible exclusion criteria for receiving GAS such as psychosis, unstable mental health, ambivalence, and secondary gain (e.g., getting out of the military), lack of triggering major life events or crises, lack of sufficient distress in therapy, presence of marital bonds (given the illegality of same-sex marriage during this period), and if natal genitals were used for pleasure ( 3 – 5 , 7 – 13 ).

Others focused the role of the psychiatric evaluation on the social lives and roles of the patient. They believed the evaluation should include exploring the patient’s motivation for change for at least 6–12 months ( 8 ), facilitating realistic expectations of treatment, managing family issues, providing support during social transition and post-operatively ( 13 ), and encouraging GAH and the “real-life test” (RLT). The RLT is a period in which a person must fully live in their affirmed gender identity, “testing” if it is right for them. In 1970, Green recommended that a primary goal of treatment was that, “the male patient must be able to pass in society as a socially acceptable woman in appearance and to conduct the normal affairs of the day without arousing undue suspicion” ( 14 ). Benjamin also noted concern that “too masculine” features may be a contraindication to surgery so as to not make an “acceptable woman” ( 7 ). Some publications recommended at least 1–2 years of a RLT ( 3 , 7 , 11 , 15 ), while others recommended at least 5 years of RLT prior to considering GAS ( 12 ). Emphasis was placed on verifying the accuracy of reported information from family or friends to ensure “authentic” motivation for GAS and rule out ambivalence or secondary gain (e.g., getting out of the military) ( 10 ).

Ell recommended evaluation to ensure the patient has “adequate intelligence” to understand realistic expectations of surgery and attempted to highlight the patient’s autonomy in the decision to undergo GAS. He wrote, “That is your decision [to undergo surgery]. It’s up to you to prove that you are a suitable candidate for surgery. It’s not for me to offer it to you. If you decide to go ahead with your plans to pass in the opposite gender role, you do it on your own responsibility” ( 8 ). Notably, many authors conceptualized gender transition along a binary, with individuals transitioning from one end to the other.

In these earliest publications, one can start to see the beginning framework of modern-day requirements for accessing GAS, including ensuring an accurate diagnosis of gender incongruence; ruling out other possible causes of presentation such as psychosis; ensuring general mental stability; making sure that the patient has undergone at least some time of living in their affirmed gender; and that they are able to understand the consequences of the procedure.

Standards of care version 1 and 2

Changes to the standards of care.

The first two versions of the WPATH SOC were written in 1979 and 1980, respectively and are substantially similar to one another. SOC version three was the first to be published in an academic journal in 1985 and changes from the first two versions were documented within this publication. The first two versions required that all recommendations for GAC be completed by licensed psychologists or psychiatrists. The first version recommended that patients requesting GAH and non-genital GAS, spend 3 and 6 months, respectively, living full time in their affirmed gender. These recommendations were rescinded in subsequent versions ( 16 ). Figure 2 reviews changes to the recommendations for GAC within the WPATH SOC over time.

Changes to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) standards of care around gender affirming medical and surgical treatments over time.

Results review

Five articles published between 1979 and 1980 were included in this review. Again, emphasis was placed on proper diagnosis, classification and consistency of gender identity over time ( 17 , 18 ).

Wise and Meyer explored the concept of a continuum between TV and TS, describing that those who experienced gender dysphoria often requested GAS, displayed evidence of strong cross-dressing desires with arousal, history of cross-gender roles, and absence of manic-depressive or psychotic illnesses ( 19 ). Requirements for GAS at the Johns Hopkins Gender Clinic included at least 2 years of cross-dressing, working in the opposite gender role, and undergoing treatment with GAH and psychotherapy ( 19 ). Bernstein identified factors correlated with negative GAS outcomes including presence of psychosis, drug abuse, frequent suicide attempts, criminality, unstable relationships, and low intelligence level ( 18 ). Lothstein stressed the importance of correct diagnosis, “since life stressors may lead some transvestites to clinically present as transsexuals desiring SRS” ( 20 ). Levine reviewed the diagnostic process employed by Case Western Reserve University Gender Identity Clinic which involved initial interview by a social worker to collect psychometric testing, followed by two independent psychiatric interviews to obtain the developmental gender history, understand treatment goals, and evaluate for underlying co-morbid mental health diagnoses, with a final multidisciplinary conference to integrate the various evaluations and develop a treatment plan ( 21 ).

Standards of care version 3

Version 3 broadened the definition of the clinician thereby broadening the scope of providers who could write recommendation letters for GAC. Whereas prior SOC required letters from licensed psychologists or psychiatrists, version 3 allowed initial evaluations from providers with at least a Master’s degree in behavioral science, and when required, a second evaluation from any licensed provider with at least a doctoral degree. Version 3 recommended that all evaluators demonstrate competence in “gender identity matters” and must know the patient, “in a psychotherapeutic relationship,” for at least 6 months ( 16 ). Version 3 relied on the definition of TS in DSM-III, which specified the sense of discomfort with one’s anatomic sex be “continuous (not limited to a period of stress) for at least 2 years” and be independently verified by a source other than the patient through collateral or through a longitudinal relationship with the mental health provider ( 16 ). Recommendation of GAS specifically required at least 6–12 months of RLT, for non-genital and genital GAS, respectively ( 16 ).”

Nine articles were published during the timeframe that the SOC version 3 were active (1981–1990). Themes in these publications included increasing focus on selection criteria for GAS and emphasis on the RLT, which was used to ensure proper diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Recommendations for the duration of the RLT ranged anywhere between 1 and 3 years ( 22 , 23 ).

Proposed components of the mental health evaluation for GAS included a detailed assessment of the duration, intensity, and stability of the gender dysphoria, identification of underlying psychiatric diagnoses and suicidal ideation, a mental status examination to rule out psychosis, and an assessment of intelligence (e.g., IQ) to comment on the individual’s “capacity and competence” to consent to GAC. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), and Lindgren-Pauly Body Image Scale were also used during assessments ( 24 ).

Authors developed more specific inclusion and exclusion criteria for undergoing GAS with inclusion criteria including age 21 or older, not legally married, no pending litigation, evidence of gender dysphoria, completion of 1 year of psychotherapy, between 1 and 2 years RLT with ability to “pass convincingly” and “perform successfully” in the opposite gender role, at least 6 months on GAH (if medically tolerable), reasonably stable mental health (including absence of psychosis, depression, alcoholism and intellectual disability), good financial standing with psychotherapy fees ( 25 ), and a prediction that GAS would improve personal and social functioning ( 26 – 29 ). A 1987 survey of European psychiatrists identified their most common requirements as completion of a RLT of 1–2 years, psychiatric observation, mental stability, no psychosis, and 1 year of GAH ( 27 ).

Standards of care version 4

World Professional Association for Transgender Health SOC version four was published in 1990. Between version three and version four, DSM-III-R was published in 1987. Version four relied on the DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for TS as opposed to the DSM-III criteria in version three. The DSM-III-R criteria for TS included a “persistent discomfort and sense of inappropriateness about one’s assigned sex,” “persistent preoccupation for at least 2 years with getting rid of one’s primary and secondary sex characteristics and acquiring the sex characteristics of the other sex,” and that the individual had reached puberty ( 30 ). Notable changes from the DSM-III criteria include specifying a time duration for the discomfort (2 years) and designating that individuals must have reached puberty.

Six articles were published between 1990 and 1998 while version four was active. Earlier trends continued including emphasizing proper diagnosis of gender dysphoria ( 31 , 32 ), however, a new trend emerged toward implementing more comprehensive evaluations, with an emphasis on decision making, a key element of informed consent.

Bockting and Coleman, in a move representative of other publications of this era, advocated for a more comprehensive approach to the mental health evaluation and treatment of gender dysphoria. Their treatment model was comprised of five main components: a mental health assessment consisting of psychological testing and clinical interviews with the individual, couple, and/or family; a physical examination; management of comorbid disorders with pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy; facilitation of identity formation and sexual identity management through individual and group therapy; and aftercare consisting of individual, couple, and/or family therapy with the option of a gender identity consolidation support group. Psychoeducation was a main thread throughout the treatment model and a variety of treatment “subtasks” such as understanding decision making, sexual functioning and sexual identity exploration, social support, and family of origin intimacy were identified as important. The authors advocated for “a clear separation of gender identity, social sex role, and sexual orientation which allows a wide spectrum of sexual identities and prevents limiting access to GAS to those who conform to a heterosexist paradigm of mental health” ( 33 ).

This process can be compared with the Italian SOC for GAS which recommend a multidisciplinary assessment consisting of a psychosocial evaluation and informed consent discussion around treatment options, procedures, and risks. Requirements included 6 months of psychotherapy prior to initiating GAH, 1 year of a RLT prior to GAS, and provision of a court order approving GAS, which could not be granted any sooner than 2 years after starting the process of gender transition. Follow-up was recommended at 6, 12, and 24 months post-GAS to ensure psychosocial adjustment to the affirmed gender role ( 34 ).

Other authors continued to refine inclusion and exclusion criteria for GAS by surveying the actual practices of health centers. Inclusion criteria included those who had life-long cross gender identification with inability to live in their sex assigned at birth; a 1–2 years RLT (a nearly universal requirement in the survey); and ability to pass “effortlessly and convincingly in society”; completed 1 year of GAH; maintained a stable job; were unmarried or divorced; demonstrated good coping skills and social-emotional stability; had a good support system; and were able to maintain a relationship with a psychotherapist. Exclusion criteria included age under 21 years old, recent death of a parent ( 35 ), unstable gender identity, unstable psychosocial circumstances, unstable psychiatric illness (such as schizophrenia, suicide attempts, substance abuse, intellectual disability, organic brain disorder, AIDS), incompatible marital status, criminal history/activity or physical/medical disability ( 36 ).

The survey indicated some programs were more lenient around considering individuals with bipolar affective disorder, the ability to pass successfully, and issues around family support. Only three clinics used sexual orientation as a factor in decision for GAS, marking a significant change in the literature from prior decades. Overall, the authors found that 74% of the clinics surveyed did not adhere to WPATH SOC, instead adopting more conservative policies ( 36 ).

Standards of care version 5

Published in 1998, version five defined the responsibilities of the mental health professional which included diagnosing the gender disorder, diagnosing and treating co-morbid psychiatric conditions, counseling around GAC, providing psychotherapy, evaluating eligibility and readiness criteria for GAC, and collaborating with medical and surgical colleagues by writing letters of recommendation for GAC ( Figure 3 ). Eligibility and readiness criteria were more explicitly described in this version to refer to the specific objective and subjective criteria, respectively, that the patient must meet before proceeding to the next step of their gender transition. The seven elements to include in a letter of readiness were more explicitly listed within this version as well including: the patient’s identifying characteristics, gender, sexual orientation, any other psychological diagnoses, duration and nature of the treatment with the letter writer, whether the author is part of a gender team, whether eligibility criteria have been met, the patient’s ability to follow the SOC and an offer of collaboration. Version five removes the requirement that patients undertake psychotherapy to be eligible for GAC ( 37 ).

Changes to the ten tasks of the mental health provider within the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) standards of care over time.

Five articles were published between 1998 and 2001 while version five was active. Two of these articles were summaries of the SOC ( 37 , 38 ). Themes in these publications included continued attempts to develop comprehensive treatment models for GAS.

Ma reviewed the role of the social worker in a multidisciplinary gender clinic in Hong Kong. Psychosocial assessment for GAS included evaluation of performance in affirmed social roles, adaptation to the affirmed gender role during the 1-year RLT and understanding the patient’s identified gender role and the response to the new gender role culturally and interpersonally within the individual’s support network and family unit. She noted five contraindications to GAS: a history of psychosis, sociopathy, severe depression, organic brain dysfunction or “defective intelligence,” success in parental or marital roles, “successful functioning in heterosexual intercourse,” ability to function in the pretransition gender role, and homosexual or TV history with genital pleasure. She proposed a social work practice model for patients who apply for GAS with categorization of TGD individuals into “better-adjusted” and “poorly-adjusted” with different intervention goals and methods for each. For those who were “better-adjusted,” treatment focused on psychoeducation, building coping tools, and mobilization into a peer counselor role, while treatment goals for those who were “poorly-adjusted” focused on building support and resources ( 39 ).

Damodaran and Kennedy reviewed the assessment and treatment model used by the Monash gender dysphoria clinic in Melbourne, Australia for patients requesting GAS. All referrals for GAS were assessed independently by two psychiatrists to determine proper diagnosis of gender dysphoria, followed by endocrinology and psychology consultation to develop a comprehensive treatment plan. Requirements included RLT of minimum 18 months and GAH ( 40 ).

Miach reviewed the utility of using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), a revision of the MMPI which was standardized using a more heterogeneous population, in a gender clinic to assess stability of psychopathology prior to GAS, which was only performed on patients aged 21–55 years old. The authors concluded that while the TGD group had a significantly lower level of psychopathology than the control group, they believed that the MMPI-2 was a useful test in assessing readiness for GAC ( 41 ).

Standards of care version 6

Published in 2001, version six of the WPATH SOC did not include significant changes to the 10 tasks of the mental health professional ( Figure 3 ) or in the general recommendations for content of the letters of readiness. An important change in the eligibility criteria for GAH allowed providers to prescribe hormones even if patients had not undergone RLT or psychotherapy if it was for harm reduction purposes (i.e., to prevent patient from buying black market hormones). A notable change in version six separated the eligibility and readiness criteria for top (breast augmentation or mastectomy) and bottom (any gender-affirming surgical alteration of genitalia or reproductive organs) surgery allowing some patients, particularly individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB), to receive a mastectomy without having been on GAH or completing a 12 month RLT ( 42 , 43 ).

Thirteen articles were published between 2001 and 2012. One is a systematic review of evidence for factors that are associated with regret and suicide, and predictive factors of a good psychological and social functioning outcome after GAC. De Cuypere and Vercruysse note that less than one percent of patients regret having GAS or commit suicide, making detection of negative predictive factors in a study nearly impossible. They identified a wide array of positive predictive factors including age at time of request, sex of partner, premorbid social or psychiatric functioning, adequacy of social support system, level of satisfaction with secondary sexual characteristics, and surgical outcomes. Many of these predictive factors were later disproved. They also noted that there were not enough studies to determine whether following the WPATH guidelines was a positive predictive factor. In the end they noted that the evidence for all established evaluation regimens (i.e., RLT, age cut-off, psychotherapy, etc.) was at best indeterminate. They recommended that changes to WPATH criteria should redirect focus from gender identity to psychopathology, differential diagnosis, and psychotherapy for severe personality disorders ( 44 ).

The literature at this time supports two opposing approaches to requests for GAC, those advocating for a set of strictly enforced eligibility and readiness criteria associated with very thorough evaluations and those who advocate for a more flexible approach. Common approaches to the evaluation for GAC include: taking a detailed social history including current relationships, support systems, income, and social functioning; a sexual development history meant to understand when and how the patient began to identify as TGD and how their transition has affected their life; an evaluation of their coping skills, “psychic functions” and general mental well-being; and a focus on assessing the “correct diagnosis” of gender identity disorder ( 44 – 56 ). The use of a multidisciplinary team was also commonly recommended ( 44 , 47 , 48 , 51 , 54 – 56 ).

Those that advocated for a stricter interpretation of the eligibility and readiness criteria emphasized the importance of the RLT ( 45 , 49 , 51 , 53 , 55 , 56 ). One clinic in the UK required a RLT lasting 2 years prior to starting GAH, twice as long as recommended by the SOC ( 49 ). The prevailing view continued to approach gender as a binary phenomenon, rather than as a spectrum of experiences. As a result, treatment recommendations emphasized helping the patient to “pass” in their chosen gender role and did not endorse patients receiving less than the full spectrum of treatment to transition fully from one sex to the other. Several authors indicated that they required some amount of psychotherapy before recommending GAC ( 46 , 47 , 51 , 52 , 55 , 56 ). One author described requirements in Turkey, which unlike the US has the requirements enshrined in law and defines an important role for the courts in granting permission for GAC ( 51 ). In general, these authors supported the gatekeeping role of the mental health provider as a mechanism to prevent cases of regret.

Among groups supporting a flexible interpretation of the SOC, there was a much stronger emphasis on the supportive role of the mental health provider in the gender transition process ( 44 – 46 , 48 , 52 , 53 ). This role included creating a supportive environment for the patient, asking and using the correct pronouns, and helping to guide them through what may be a difficult transition both socially and physically. They emphasized the importance of the psychosocial evaluation including the patient’s connections to others in the TGD community, their social functioning, substance use, and psychiatric history/psychological functioning. While informed consent was mentioned as part of the evaluation, the process was not thoroughly explored and largely focused on patients’ awareness that GAS is an irreversible procedure which removes healthy tissue ( 53 ). One author suggested that a “consumer handbook outlining such rights and responsibilities” related to GAS be made available, but they made no further comment on the informed consent process ( 44 ). There was no further guidance as to the contents of letters of readiness for GAC.

The lack of emphasis on informed consent by both groups of authors mirrors the discussion of informed consent within the SOC, which up through version six, had a relatively narrow definition and role specifically related to risks and benefits of surgery. As far back as version one, the SOC states “hormonal and surgical sex reassignment are procedures which must be requested by, and performed only with the agreement of, the patient having informed consent…[these procedures] may be conducted or administered only after the patient applicant has received full and complete explanations, preferably in writing, in words understood by the patient applicant, of all risks inherent in the requested procedures ( 16 ). “This reflects the dominant concerns of surgeons at the time that they were removing or damaging healthy tissue, which was unethical, and as such wanted to make sure that patients understood the irreversibility of the procedures. It was not until version 7 that there is a change in the discussion of informed consent.

Standards of care version 7

Standards of care version seven was published in 2013. Publication of version seven coincided with the publication of DSM-5, in which the diagnosis required to receive GAC shifted from Gender Identity Disorder to Gender Dysphoria, in an effort to de-pathologize TGD patients. Version seven highlights that these are guidelines meant to be flexible to account for different practices in different places. Compared to version six, a significantly expanded section on the “Tasks of the Mental Health Provider” was added, offering some instructions on what to include in the assessment of the patient for GAS. For the first time the SOC expand on what it means to obtain informed consent and describe a process where the mental health provider is expected to guide a conversation around gender identity and how different treatments and procedures might affect TGD individuals psychologically, socially, and physically. Other recommendations include “at a minimum, assessment of gender identity and gender dysphoria, history and development of gender dysphoric feelings, the impact of stigma attached to gender non-conformity on mental health, and the availability of support from family, friends, and peers.” There is also a change to the recommended content of the letters: switching from “The initial and evolving gender, sexual, and other psychiatric diagnoses” to “Results of the client’s psychosocial assessment, including any diagnoses”, indicating a shift in the focus away from diagnosis toward the psychosocial assessment. Version 7 also adds two new tasks for the mental health provider including “Educate and advocate on behalf of clients within their community (schools, workplaces, other organizations) and assist clients with making changes in identity documents” and “Provide information and referral for peer support”( 2 ).

There were also significant changes to eligibility criteria for GAC. For GAH, version seven eliminates entirely the requirement for a RLT and psychotherapy and adds requirements for “persistent well documented gender dysphoria” and “reasonably well controlled” medical or mental health concerns. Notably, the SOC do not define the meaning of “reasonably well controlled,” leaving providers to interpret this on their own. Version seven delineates separate requirements for top and bottom surgeries. The criteria for both feminizing and masculinizing top surgeries are identical to each other and identical to those laid out for GAH. Version seven explicitly states that GAH is not required prior to top surgery, although GAH is still recommended prior to gender-affirming breast augmentation. Criteria for bottom surgery are more explicitly defined, namely internal (i.e., hysterectomy, orchiectomy) vs. external (i.e., metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, and vaginoplasty). For internal surgeries, criteria are the same as for top surgery with the addition of a required 12 months of GAH. For external surgeries the criteria are the same as for internal, with the addition of required 12 months of living in the patient’s affirmed gender identity ( 2 , 42 ).

Twenty-three articles were published while version 7 of the SOC have been active. Themes include identifying the role of psychometric testing in GAC evaluations, expanding the discussion around informed consent for GAC, and revising the requirements for letter writers.

A systematic review evaluated the accuracy of psychometric tests in those requesting GAC, identifying only two published manuscripts that met their inclusion criteria, both of which were of poor quality; this led them to question the utility of psychometric tests in in TGD patients ( 57 ). Keo-Meir and Fitzgerald provided a detailed narrative review of psychometric and neurocognitive exams in the TGD population and concluded that psychometric testing should not be done unless there is a question about the capacity of the patient to provide informed consent ( 58 ). The only other manuscripts that include a mention of psychological testing describe processes in Iran and China, both of which require extensive psychological testing prior to approval for GAC ( 59 , 60 ). These two manuscripts, in addition to an ethnographic study of the evaluation process in Turkey ( 61 ), are also the only ones that indicate a requirement for psychotherapy prior to approval for treatment. The three international manuscripts described above plus three manuscripts from the US ( 62 – 64 ) are the only ones to include consideration of a RLT, with authors outside the US preferring a long RLT and US authors considering RLT as part of the informed consent process for GAS, and not required at all prior to the initiation of GAH.

Many authors describe the process of informed consent for GAC ( 1 , 58 , 60 , 62 – 76 ). In China, a signature indicating informed consent from the patient’s family is required in addition to that of the patient ( 60 ). Many authors emphasize evaluating for and addressing social determinants of health including housing status, income, transportation, trauma history, etc. ( 1 , 58 , 60 , 67 , 69 – 71 , 75 – 77 ). Deutsch advocated for the psychosocial evaluation being the most important aspect of the evaluation and suggests that one of the letters required for bottom surgery be replaced by a functional assessment (i.e., ADLs/iADLs), which could be repeated as needed or removed entirely for high functioning patients ( 69 ).

Practice patterns and opinions on who should write letters of readiness and how many letters should be required vary widely. Many letters that surgeons receive are cursory, and short and non-personal letters correlate with poor surgical outcomes ( 1 ). Several authors advocate for eliminating the second letter entirely, for at least some procedures, as it is a barrier to care ( 68 , 69 , 74 ). Some support removing the requirement that both letter writers be therapists or psychiatrists, and even suggesting the second letter be written by a urologist ( 72 ) or a social worker who has performed a detailed social assessment ( 69 , 75 ). The evaluation in Turkey requires a report written by an extensive multidisciplinary team and submitted to a court for approval ( 61 ). Surveys of providers indicate that the SOC are not uniformly implemented leading to huge disparities based on the providers knowledge level and personal beliefs ( 77 , 78 ). Additional recommendations include that providers spend significant time discussing the SOC and diagnosis of gender dysphoria with the patients prior to providing a letter to prepare them for the stigma such a diagnosis may confer ( 65 , 66 ), and dropping gender dysphoria entirely in favor the ICD-11 diagnosis of gender incongruence, as it may be less stigmatizing ( 71 ).

The Mount Sinai Gender Clinic describes an integrated multidisciplinary model where a patient will see a primary care doctor, endocrinologist, social worker, psychiatrist, and obtain any necessary lab work in a single visit, significantly reducing barriers to care. The criteria in this model focus on informed consent, the social determinants of health, being physically ready for surgery, and putting measurable goals on psychiatric stability, while deemphasizing the gender dysphoria diagnosis. Their study showed that people who received their evaluation over a 2-year period were more likely to meet their in-house criteria than they were to meet criteria as set forth in WPATH SOC. The Mount Sinai criteria allowed for significantly decreased barriers to care, allowing more people to progress through desired GAC in a timely fashion ( 75 ).

Standards of care version 8

Standards of care version 8, published in September 2022, includes major updates to the guidelines around GAS. This version explicitly highlights the importance of informed decision making, patient autonomy, and harm reduction models of care, as well as emphasizing the flexibility of the guidelines which the authors note can be modified by the healthcare provider in consultation with the TGD individual.

Version 8 lays out the roles of the assessor which are to identify the presence of gender incongruence and any co-existing mental health concerns, provide information on GAC, support the TGD individual in their decision-making, and to assess for capacity to consent to GAC. The authors emphasize the collaborative nature of this decision-making process between the assessor and the TGD individual, as well as recommending TGD care occur in a multidisciplinary team model when possible.

Version 8 recommends that providers who assess TGD individuals for GAC hold at least a Master’s level degree and have sufficient knowledge in diagnosing gender incongruence and distinguishing it from other diagnoses which may present similarly. These changes allow for non-mental health providers to be the main assessors for GAC.

Version 8 recommends reducing the number of evaluations prior to GAS to a single evaluation in an effort to reduce barriers to care for the TGD population. Notably, the authors have removed the recommendations around content of the letter of readiness for GAC. The guidelines note that the complexity of the assessment process may differ from patient to patient, based on the type of GAC requested and the specific characteristics of the patient. Version eight directly states that psychometric testing and psychotherapy are not requirements to pursue GAC. While evaluations should continue to identify co-existing mental health diagnoses, version 8 highlights that the presence of a mental health diagnosis should not prevent access to GAC unless the mental health symptoms directly interfere with capacity to provide informed consent for treatment or interfere with receiving treatment. Version 8 recommends that perioperative matters, such as travel requirements, presence of stable, safe housing, hygiene/healthy living, any activity restrictions, and aftercare optimization, be discussed by the surgeon prior to GAS. In terms of eligibility criteria, the authors recommend a reduced duration of GAH from 12 months (from version 7) to 6 months (in version 8) prior to pursuing GAS involving reproductive organs ( 79 ).

Ethical discussions

A total of eleven articles explored ethical considerations of conducting mental health evaluations and writing letters of readiness for GAS, including a comparison of the ethical principles prioritized within the “gatekeeping” model vs. the informed consent model for GAC and the differential treatment of TGD individuals compared to cisgender individuals seeking similar surgical procedures.

Many authors compare the informed consent model of care for TGD individuals to the WPATH SOC model. In the informed consent model, the role of the health practitioner is to provide TGD patients with information about risks, side effects, benefits, and possible consequences of undergoing GAC, and to obtain informed consent from the patient ( 80 ). Cavanaugh et al. argue that the informed consent model is more patient-centered and elevates the ethical principle of autonomy above non-maleficence, the principle often prioritized in the “gatekeeping” model ( 81 ). They write, “Through a discussion of risks and benefits of possible treatment options with the patient…clinicians work to assist patients in making decisions. This approach recognizes that patients are the only ones who are best positioned, in the context of their lived experience, to assess and judge beneficence (i.e., the potential improvement in their welfare that might be achieved), and it also affords prescribing clinicians a better and fuller sense of how a particular patient balances principles of non-maleficence and beneficence.” Authors note that mental health providers can be particularly helpful in situations where an individual desires additional mental health treatment, which some argue should remain optional, or when an individual’s capacity is in question ( 81 ). Additional ethical considerations include balancing the respect for the dignity of persons, responsible caring, integrity in relationships, and responsibility to society ( 82 ). Other authors argue for a more systematic approach to ethical issues, including consulting the literature and/or experts in the field of TGD mental health for support in making decisions around GAC ( 74 ).

Hale criticizes the WPATH SOC noting that these guidelines create a barrier between patient and mental health provider in establishing trust and a therapeutic relationship, overly pathologize TGD individuals, and unnecessarily impose financial costs to the TGD individual. As a “gatekeeper,” the mental health provider is placed in the position of either granting or denying GAC and must weigh the competing ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, and autonomy. He argues that mental health providers are not surrogate decision makers and that framing requests for GAS as a “phenomenon of incapacity” is “reflective of the overall incapacitating effects of society at large toward the TGD community” ( 83 ). This reflects the broader approach to determining capacity utilized in other medical contexts, namely that patients have capacity until proven otherwise ( 84 ). Additionally, due to the gatekeeping dynamic between patient and clinician, many TGD patients may not mention concerns or fears surrounding GAS out of concern they will be denied services, thereby limiting the quality and utility of the informed consent discussion. Ashley proposes changes to the informed consent model, specifically that the informed consent process should include not only information about whether to go through with a procedure, but how to go through the procedure including relevant information about timeline, side effects, need for perioperative support, and treatment plan ( 85 ). Gruenweld argues for a bottom-up, TGD-led provision of GAC instead of focusing solely on alleviating gender dysphoria through a top-down, medical expert approach via such systems like the WPATH SOC ( 86 ).

MacKinnon et al. conducted an institutional ethnographic study of both TGD individuals undergoing mental health evaluations for GAC and mental health providers to better understand the process of conducting such evaluations ( 87 ). They found that providers cited three concerns with the evaluation: determining the authenticity of an individual’s TGD identity, determining if the individual has the capacity to consent to treatment, and determining the readiness of the individual to undergo treatment. TGD individuals cited concerns around presenting enough distress to be diagnosed with gender dysphoria (a SOC requirement) versus too much distress, and risk being diagnosed with an uncontrolled mental health condition therefore being ineligible for GAC. The authors conclude, “although they are designed to optimize and universalize care… psychosocial readiness assessments actually create a medically risky and arguably unethical situation in which trans people experiencing mental health issues have to decide what is more important – transitioning at the potential expense of care for their mental health or disclosing significant mental health issues at the expense of being rendered not ready to transition (which in turn may produce or exacerbate mental distress)” ( 87 ).

With regards to writing letters of readiness for GAS, authors comment on the differential treatment of TGD compared to cisgender individuals. Bouman argues that requiring two letters for gender-affirming orchiectomy or hysterectomy is unethical given that orchiectomy and hysterectomy for chronic scrotal pain and dysfunctional uterine bleeding, respectively, do not require any mental health evaluation. Requiring a second letter may cause delays in treatment, increase financial costs, and may be invasive to the patient who must undergo two detailed evaluations, while allowing for diffusion of responsibility for the mental health provider ( 88 ).

Changing standards

Starting in the 1950’s with the first successful gender affirming procedure in the US on Christine Jorgenson, TGD people in the US started seeking surgical treatment of what was then called TS. The medical community’s understanding of TGD people, their mental health, and the role of the mental health provider in their medical and surgical transition has progressed and evolved since this time. Prior to the first iteration of what would later be known as WPATH’s SOC, patients were mostly evaluated within a system that viewed gender and sexual minorities as deviants and thereby largely limited access to GAC. We can also see this reflected in the changes to DSM and ICD diagnostic criteria between 1980 and today which demonstrates a trend from pathologizing identity and conflating sexual and gender identity toward pathologizing the distress experienced due to the discordant identity, and finally removing the relevant diagnosis from the chapter of Mental and Behavioral Disorders altogether in the ICD and instead into a new chapter titled “conditions related to sexual health ( 89 ).” These changes have clearly yielded positive benefits for TGD individuals by reducing stigma and improving access to care, but significant problems remain. Requiring TGD people to have a diagnosis at all to obtain care, no matter the terminology used, is pathologizing. The practice of requiring a diagnosis continues to put mental health and other medical providers in the position of gatekeeping, continuing the vestigial historical focus on “confirming” a person’s gender identity, rather than trusting that TGD people understand their identities better than providers do. Version 8 of the SOC put a much heavier emphasis on shared decision making and informed consent, but continue to maintain the requirement of a diagnosis ( 79 ). Many insurance companies and other health care payers require the diagnosis to justify paying for GAC, but providers should continue to advocate for removing such labels as a gatekeeping mechanism for GAC.

With each version of the SOC, guidelines for GAC become more specific, with more explanation of the reasoning behind each recommendation; more flexible requirements, a broadening of the definition of mental health provider, and elimination of the requirement that at least one letter be written by a doctoral level provider. There has been a notable shift in the conceptualization of gender identity, away from a strict gender binary, with individuals transitioning fully from one end to the other, to gender identity and transition as a spectrum of experiences. Over time the SOC became more flexible by removing requirements for psychotherapy, narrowing requirement for the RLT to only those pursuing bottom surgery, eliminating requirements for a mental health evaluation prior to initiating GAH, and eliminating requirements for GAH prior to top surgery. Version 8 of the SOC was even more explicit about removing requirements for psychotherapy and psychometric testing prior to receiving GAC ( 79 ).

Despite these positive changes, those wishing to access GAC still face significant challenges. Access to providers knowledgeable about GAC remains limited, especially in more rural areas, therefore requiring evaluations and letters of readiness for GAC continues to significantly limit access to treatment. By requiring letters of readiness for GAC, adult TGD individuals are not afforded the same level of autonomy present in almost any other medical context, where capacity to provide informed consent is automatically established ( 84 ). The WPATH SOC continue to perpetuate differential treatment of TGD individuals by requiring extensive, and often invasive, evaluations for procedures that their cisgender peers are able to access without such evaluations ( 88 ). The WPATH guidelines apply a one-size-fits-all approach to an extremely heterogeneous community who have varying levels of needs based on a variety of factors including but not limited to age, socioeconomic status, race, natal sex, and geographic location ( 90 ). It should be noted, however, that the version 8 of the SOC does acknowledge that different patients may require evaluations of varying complexity based on the procedure they are requesting as well as a variety of psychosocial factors, although it remains vague about exactly what those different evaluations should entail ( 79 ). We propose that future work be directed toward three primary goals: conducting research to determine the utility of letters of readiness; to better understand factors that impact GAS outcomes; and to develop easily accessible and understandable guides to conducting readiness evaluations and writing letters. These aims will help to further our goals of advocating for this vastly underserved population by further removing barriers to life-saving GAC.

Changing ethics

Early iterations of the SOC were strict, placing the mental health provider within a gatekeeper role, tasked with distinguishing the “true transsexual” that would benefit from GAS from those who would not, which in effect elevated the ethical principal of non-maleficence above autonomy. This created a barrier to forming a therapeutic alliance between the patient and mental health provider as there was little motivation for patients to give any information outside of the expected gender narrative ( 50 , 65 ). Mistrust flowed both ways leading to longer and more involved evaluations then than what is required today, with many providers requiring patients to undergo extensive psychological testing and psychotherapy, provide extensive collateral, and undergo lengthy RLTs, with some focusing on a patient’s ability to “pass” within the desire gender role, before agreeing to write a letter ( 11 , 15 , 19 , 49 , 57 , 58 ).

As understanding around the experiences of TGD individuals has evolved over time, the emphasis has shifted from the reliance on non-maleficence toward elevating patient autonomy as the guiding principle of care. Evaluations within this informed consent model focus much more on the patient’s ability to understand the treatment, its aftercare, and its potential effect on their lives. Informed consent evaluations also shift focus toward other psychosocial factors that will contribute to successful surgical outcomes, for example, housing, transportation, a support system, and treatment of any underlying mental health symptoms. While there is still a lack of consistency in current evaluations and the SOC are enforced unevenly ( 77 ), the use of the informed consent model by some providers has reduced barriers for some patients. Many authors now agree that psychological or neuropsychological testing should not be used when evaluating for surgical readiness unless there is a concern about the patient’s ability to provide informed consent such as in the case of a neurocognitive or developmental disorder ( 58 ). Also important to note here is that while there is a general shift in the focus of the literature from that of gatekeeping toward one of informed consent, neither the informed consent model nor the WPATH SOC more broadly are evenly applied by providers, leading to continued barriers for many patients ( 77 , 78 ).

Within the literature, there is support for further reducing barriers to care by widening the definition of who can conduct evaluations, write letters, or facilitate the informed consent discussion for GAC. Recommending that the physician providing the GAC be the one to conduct the informed consent evaluation would bring GAC practices more in line with practices in place within the broader medical community. It is very rare for mental health providers to be the gatekeepers for medical or surgical procedures, except for transplant surgery, where mental health providers may have a clearer role given the prominence of substance use disorders and the very limited resource of organs. However, even within transplant psychiatry, a negative psychiatric evaluation would not necessarily preclude the patient from receiving the transplant, but instead may be used to guide a treatment plan to improve chances of a successful recovery post-operatively. We then should consider what it means to embrace patient autonomy as our guiding principle, especially with more than 40 years of evidence of the positive effects around GAC behind us. Future guidelines should focus on making sure that TGD individuals are good surgical candidates, not based on their gender identity, but instead on a more holistic understanding of the factors that lead to good and bad gender-affirming surgical outcomes, along the lines of those proposed by Mt. Sinai’s gender clinic for vaginoplasty ( 75 ). Additionally, the physicians providing the GAC should in most cases be the ones to obtain informed consent, while retaining the ability to request a mental health evaluation if specific concerns related to mental health arise. This would both allow mental health providers to adopt a supportive consultant role rather than that of gatekeeper, as well as provide more individualized rather than one-size-fits-all care to patients.

Version 8 of the SOC go a long way toward changing the ethical focus of evaluations toward one of shared decision making and informed consent by removing the requirement of a second letter and the requirement that the letter be written by a mental health provider. This will, in theory, lower barriers to care by allowing other providers (as long as they have at least a master’s degree) to write letters for surgery ( 79 ). In practice, however, this change is likely to only affect a small portion of the patient population. This is because, as noted in the section below in more detail, insurance companies already do not adhere closely to the SOC ( 91 ) and are unlikely to quickly adopt the new guidelines if at all. Further, it is possible that many surgeons will require that the letter of readiness be written by a mental health provider, especially if the patient has any previous mental health problems. While changes to SOC 8 are a step in the direction we propose in this manuscript, it is important to remember that the primary decision makers of who can access GAC in the US are insurance companies with surgeons, primary care providers, and mental health providers as secondary decision makers; this leaves patients with much less real-world autonomy than the SOC state they should have in the process. While insurance companies hold this effective decision-making power in all of US healthcare, it could be at least partially addressed by developing clear, evidence based guidelines for which patients might require a more in-depth evaluation in the first place. Screening out patients that have little or no mental health or social barriers to care would directly reduce those patients’ barriers to receiving GAC, while freeing up mental health and other providers to provide evaluation, resources, and support to those patients who will actually benefit from these services.

Letter writing

There are few published guides for writing letters of readiness for GAC. The WPATH SOC provide vague guidelines as to the information to include within the letter itself, which, in addition to a lack of consistency in implementation of the SOC, lead to a huge variety in current practices around letter writing and limit their usefulness to surgical providers ( 1 ). There is much debate within the literature about how many letters should be required and who should be able to write them. Guidelines from China, Turkey, and Iran recommend much stricter processes requiring input from a wider variety of specialists to comment on a patient’s readiness ( 59 – 61 ). Within the US, the few recent recommendations include having a frank discussion with patients about the gender dysphoria diagnosis and allowing them to have input into the content of the letter itself ( 65 , 66 , 70 , 71 , 75 ). The heterogeneity of current practices around letter writing demonstrates a reality in which many providers do not uniformly operate within the informed consent model, and do not even uniformly adhere to the SOC as written. This heterogeneity in practice by providers also extends to requirements by insurance companies in the US. The lack of clear guidelines about what should go into a letter, especially across different insurance providers, can lead to increased barriers to care due to insurance denials for incorrectly written letters. While direct data examining insurance denials for incorrectly written letters is not available, we can see this indirect effects in the fact that while 90% of insurance providers in the US provide coverage for GAC, only 5–10% of TGD patients had received bottom surgery even though about 50% of TGD patients have reported wanting it ( 91 ). Version 8 of the SOC reduce some of the letter writing requirements as discussed above, but they still do not give clear instructions on exactly how to write a letter of readiness or perform an evaluation ( 79 ). Given the lack of uniformity and limited benefit of such letters to surgical providers, these authors propose that future research be conducted into the need for letters of readiness for GAC, ways to ensure the content of such letters are evidence-based to improve outcomes of GAC, and improve education to providers by creating an easily accessible and free semi-structured interview with letter template.

Limitations

The reviewed articles included opinion manuscripts, published SOC, and proposed models for how to design and operate GAC clinics, however, this narrative review is limited by a lack of peer reviewed clinical trials that assess the evidence for the GAC practices described here. As a result, it is challenging to comment on the effectiveness of various interventions over time.

The WPATH SOC have evolved significantly over time with regards to their treatment of TGD individuals. Review of the literature shows a clear progression of practices from paternalistic gatekeeping toward increasing emphasis on patient autonomy and informed consent. Mental health evaluations, still required by SOC version eight are almost entirely unique as a requirement for GAS, apart from some bariatric and transplant surgeries. Individuals who wish to pursue GAC are required to get approval for treatments that their cisgender peers may pursue without such evaluations. While there may be some benefits from these evaluations in helping to optimize a patient socially, emotionally, and psychologically for GAC, the increased stigma and burden placed on patients by having a blanket requirement for such evaluations leads us to seriously question the readiness evaluation requirements in SOC version 8, despite a reduction in the requirements compared to previous SOC. This burden is made worse by limited access to providers knowledgeable and competent in conducting GAC evaluations, writing letters of readiness, and a lack of consistency in the application and interpretations of the SOC by both providers and insurance companies. Other barriers to care created by multiple letter requirements include the often-prohibitive cost of getting multiple evaluations and the delay in receiving their medical or surgical treatments due to extensive wait times to see a mental health provider. This barrier will in theory be ameliorated by updates to SOC in version 8, but multiple letters are likely to at least be required by insurance companies for some time. Overall, the shift from gate keeping to informed consent has been a net positive for patients by reducing barriers to care and improving patient autonomy, but the mental health evaluation is still an unnecessary barrier for many people. Further research is necessary to develop a standardized evaluation and letter template for providers to access, as well as further study into who can most benefit from an evaluation in the first place.

Data availability statement

Author contributions.

TA and KK contributed to the conception and design of the study under the guidance of RL and AJ, reviewed and analyzed the literature, and wrote the manuscript. AW organized the literature search and wrote the “Methods” section. RL and AJ assisted in review and revision of the completed manuscript. All authors approved of the submitted version.

Abbreviations

1 Gender affirming surgery has historically been referred to as sexual reassignment surgery (SRS).

2 Gender affirming care is an umbrella term referring to any medical care a TGD individual might pursue that affirms their gender identity, including primary care, mental health care, GAH or GAS.

3 The organization will be referred to as WPATH moving forward, even when referring to time periods before the name change.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1006024/full#supplementary-material

• Type 2 Diabetes
• Heart Disease
• Digestive Health
• Multiple Sclerosis
• COVID-19 Vaccines
• Occupational Therapy
• Healthy Aging
• Health Insurance
• Public Health
• Patient Rights
• Caregivers & Loved Ones
• End of Life Concerns
• Health News
• Thyroid Test Analyzer
• Doctor Discussion Guides
• Hemoglobin A1c Test Analyzer
• Lipid Test Analyzer
• Complete Blood Count (CBC) Analyzer
• What to Buy
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Medical Expert Board

Preparation and Procedures Involved in Gender Affirmation Surgeries

If you or a loved one are considering gender affirmation surgery , you are probably wondering what steps you must go through before the surgery can be done. Let's look at what is required to be a candidate for these surgeries, the potential positive effects and side effects of hormonal therapy, and the types of surgeries that are available.

Gender affirmation surgery, also known as gender confirmation surgery, is performed to align or transition individuals with gender dysphoria to their true gender.

A transgender woman, man, or non-binary person may choose to undergo gender affirmation surgery.

The term "transexual" was previously used by the medical community to describe people who undergo gender affirmation surgery. The term is no longer accepted by many members of the trans community as it is often weaponized as a slur. While some trans people do identify as "transexual", it is best to use the term "transgender" to describe members of this community.

Transitioning

Transitioning may involve:

• Social transitioning : going by different pronouns, changing one’s style, adopting a new name, etc., to affirm one’s gender
• Medical transitioning : taking hormones and/or surgically removing or modifying genitals and reproductive organs

Transgender individuals do not need to undergo medical intervention to have valid identities.  

Reasons for Undergoing Surgery

Many transgender people experience a marked incongruence between their gender and their assigned sex at birth.   The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has identified this as gender dysphoria.

Gender dysphoria is the distress some trans people feel when their appearance does not reflect their gender. Dysphoria can be the cause of poor mental health or trigger mental illness in transgender people.

For these individuals, social transitioning, hormone therapy, and gender confirmation surgery permit their outside appearance to match their true gender.  

Steps Required Before Surgery

In addition to a comprehensive understanding of the procedures, hormones, and other risks involved in gender-affirming surgery, there are other steps that must be accomplished before surgery is performed. These steps are one way the medical community and insurance companies limit access to gender affirmative procedures.

Steps may include:

• Mental health evaluation : A mental health evaluation is required to look for any mental health concerns that could influence an individual’s mental state, and to assess a person’s readiness to undergo the physical and emotional stresses of the transition.  
• Clear and consistent documentation of gender dysphoria
• A "real life" test :   The individual must take on the role of their gender in everyday activities, both socially and professionally (known as “real-life experience” or “real-life test”).

Firstly, not all transgender experience physical body dysphoria. The “real life” test is also very dangerous to execute, as trans people have to make themselves vulnerable in public to be considered for affirmative procedures. When a trans person does not pass (easily identified as their gender), they can be clocked (found out to be transgender), putting them at risk for violence and discrimination.

Requiring trans people to conduct a “real-life” test despite the ongoing violence out transgender people face is extremely dangerous, especially because some transgender people only want surgery to lower their risk of experiencing transphobic violence.

Hormone Therapy & Transitioning

Hormone therapy involves taking progesterone, estrogen, or testosterone. An individual has to have undergone hormone therapy for a year before having gender affirmation surgery.  

The purpose of hormone therapy is to change the physical appearance to reflect gender identity.

Effects of Testosterone

When a trans person begins taking testosterone , changes include both a reduction in assigned female sexual characteristics and an increase in assigned male sexual characteristics.

Bodily changes can include:

• Beard and mustache growth  
• Deepening of the voice
• Enlargement of the clitoris  
• Increased growth of body hair
• Increased muscle mass and strength  
• Increase in the number of red blood cells
• Redistribution of fat from the breasts, hips, and thighs to the abdominal area  
• Development of acne, similar to male puberty
• Baldness or localized hair loss, especially at the temples and crown of the head  
• Atrophy of the uterus and ovaries, resulting in an inability to have children

Behavioral changes include:

• Aggression  
• Increased sex drive

Effects of Estrogen

When a trans person begins taking estrogen , changes include both a reduction in assigned male sexual characteristics and an increase in assigned female characteristics.

Changes to the body can include:

• Breast development  
• Loss of erection
• Shrinkage of testicles  
• Decreased acne
• Decreased facial and body hair
• Decreased muscle mass and strength  
• Softer and smoother skin
• Slowing of balding
• Redistribution of fat from abdomen to the hips, thighs, and buttocks  
• Decreased sex drive
• Mood swings  

When Are the Hormonal Therapy Effects Noticed?

The feminizing effects of estrogen and the masculinizing effects of testosterone may appear after the first couple of doses, although it may be several years before a person is satisfied with their transition.   This is especially true for breast development.

Timeline of Surgical Process

Surgery is delayed until at least one year after the start of hormone therapy and at least two years after a mental health evaluation. Once the surgical procedures begin, the amount of time until completion is variable depending on the number of procedures desired, recovery time, and more.

Transfeminine Surgeries

Transfeminine is an umbrella term inclusive of trans women and non-binary trans people who were assigned male at birth.

Most often, surgeries involved in gender affirmation surgery are broken down into those that occur above the belt (top surgery) and those below the belt (bottom surgery). Not everyone undergoes all of these surgeries, but procedures that may be considered for transfeminine individuals are listed below.

Top surgery includes:

• Breast augmentation  
• Facial feminization
• Nose surgery: Rhinoplasty may be done to narrow the nose and refine the tip.
• Eyebrows: A brow lift may be done to feminize the curvature and position of the eyebrows.  
• Jaw surgery: The jaw bone may be shaved down.
• Chin reduction: Chin reduction may be performed to soften the chin's angles.
• Cheekbones: Cheekbones may be enhanced, often via collagen injections as well as other plastic surgery techniques.  
• Lips: A lip lift may be done.
• Alteration to hairline  
• Male pattern hair removal
• Reduction of Adam’s apple  
• Voice change surgery

Bottom surgery includes:

• Removal of the penis (penectomy) and scrotum (orchiectomy)  
• Creation of a vagina and labia

Transmasculine Surgeries

Transmasculine is an umbrella term inclusive of trans men and non-binary trans people who were assigned female at birth.

Surgery for this group involves top surgery and bottom surgery as well.

Top surgery includes :

• Subcutaneous mastectomy/breast reduction surgery.
• Removal of the uterus and ovaries
• Creation of a penis and scrotum either through metoidioplasty and/or phalloplasty

Complications and Side Effects

Surgery is not without potential risks and complications. Estrogen therapy has been associated with an elevated risk of blood clots ( deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli ) for transfeminine people.   There is also the potential of increased risk of breast cancer (even without hormones, breast cancer may develop).

Testosterone use in transmasculine people has been associated with an increase in blood pressure, insulin resistance, and lipid abnormalities, though it's not certain exactly what role these changes play in the development of heart disease.  

With surgery, there are surgical risks such as bleeding and infection, as well as side effects of anesthesia . Those who are considering these treatments should have a careful discussion with their doctor about potential risks related to hormone therapy as well as the surgeries.  

Cost of Gender Confirmation Surgery

Surgery can be prohibitively expensive for many transgender individuals. Costs including counseling, hormones, electrolysis, and operations can amount to well over $100,000. Transfeminine procedures tend to be more expensive than transmasculine ones. Health insurance sometimes covers a portion of the expenses.

Quality of Life After Surgery

Quality of life appears to improve after gender-affirming surgery for all trans people who medically transition. One 2017 study found that surgical satisfaction ranged from 94% to 100%.  

Since there are many steps and sometimes uncomfortable surgeries involved, this number supports the benefits of surgery for those who feel it is their best choice.

A Word From Verywell

Gender affirmation surgery is a lengthy process that begins with counseling and a mental health evaluation to determine if a person can be diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

After this is complete, hormonal treatment is begun with testosterone for transmasculine individuals and estrogen for transfeminine people. Some of the physical and behavioral changes associated with hormonal treatment are listed above.

After hormone therapy has been continued for at least one year, a number of surgical procedures may be considered. These are broken down into "top" procedures and "bottom" procedures.

Surgery is costly, but precise estimates are difficult due to many variables. Finding a surgeon who focuses solely on gender confirmation surgery and has performed many of these procedures is a plus.   Speaking to a surgeon's past patients can be a helpful way to gain insight on the physician's practices as well.

For those who follow through with these preparation steps, hormone treatment, and surgeries, studies show quality of life appears to improve. Many people who undergo these procedures express satisfaction with their results.

Bizic MR, Jeftovic M, Pusica S, et al. Gender dysphoria: Bioethical aspects of medical treatment . Biomed Res Int . 2018;2018:9652305. doi:10.1155/2018/9652305

American Psychiatric Association. What is gender dysphoria? . 2016.

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people . 2012.

Tomlins L. Prescribing for transgender patients . Aust Prescr . 2019;42(1): 10–13.  doi:10.18773/austprescr.2019.003

T'sjoen G, Arcelus J, Gooren L, Klink DT, Tangpricha V. Endocrinology of transgender medicine . Endocr Rev . 2019;40(1):97-117. doi:10.1210/er.2018-00011

Unger CA. Hormone therapy for transgender patients . Transl Androl Urol . 2016;5(6):877-884.  doi:10.21037/tau.2016.09.04

Seal LJ. A review of the physical and metabolic effects of cross-sex hormonal therapy in the treatment of gender dysphoria . Ann Clin Biochem . 2016;53(Pt 1):10-20.  doi:10.1177/0004563215587763

Schechter LS. Gender confirmation surgery: An update for the primary care provider . Transgend Health . 2016;1(1):32-40. doi:10.1089/trgh.2015.0006

Altman K. Facial feminization surgery: current state of the art . Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 2012;41(8):885-94.  doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.024

Therattil PJ, Hazim NY, Cohen WA, Keith JD. Esthetic reduction of the thyroid cartilage: A systematic review of chondrolaryngoplasty . JPRAS Open. 2019;22:27-32. doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.002

Top H, Balta S. Transsexual mastectomy: Selection of appropriate technique according to breast characteristics . Balkan Med J . 2017;34(2):147-155. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.0093

Chan W, Drummond A, Kelly M. Deep vein thrombosis in a transgender woman . CMAJ . 2017;189(13):E502-E504.  doi:10.1503/cmaj.160408

Streed CG, Harfouch O, Marvel F, Blumenthal RS, Martin SS, Mukherjee M. Cardiovascular disease among transgender adults receiving hormone therapy: A narrative review . Ann Intern Med . 2017;167(4):256-267. doi:10.7326/M17-0577

Hashemi L, Weinreb J, Weimer AK, Weiss RL. Transgender care in the primary care setting: A review of guidelines and literature . Fed Pract . 2018;35(7):30-37.

Van de grift TC, Elaut E, Cerwenka SC, Cohen-kettenis PT, Kreukels BPC. Surgical satisfaction, quality of life, and their association after gender-affirming aurgery: A follow-up atudy . J Sex Marital Ther . 2018;44(2):138-148. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2017.1326190

American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Gender confirmation surgeries .

American Psychological Association. Transgender people, gender identity, and gender expression .

Colebunders B, Brondeel S, D'Arpa S, Hoebeke P, Monstrey S. An update on the surgical treatment for transgender patients . Sex Med Rev . 2017 Jan;5(1):103-109. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.08.001