Grad Coach

Theoretical vs Conceptual Framework

What they are & how they’re different (with examples)

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Reviewed By: Eunice Rautenbach (DTech) | March 2023

If you’re new to academic research, sooner or later you’re bound to run into the terms theoretical framework and conceptual framework . These are closely related but distinctly different things (despite some people using them interchangeably) and it’s important to understand what each means. In this post, we’ll unpack both theoretical and conceptual frameworks in plain language along with practical examples , so that you can approach your research with confidence.

Overview: Theoretical vs Conceptual

What is a theoretical framework, example of a theoretical framework, what is a conceptual framework, example of a conceptual framework.

  • Theoretical vs conceptual: which one should I use?

A theoretical framework (also sometimes referred to as a foundation of theory) is essentially a set of concepts, definitions, and propositions that together form a structured, comprehensive view of a specific phenomenon.

In other words, a theoretical framework is a collection of existing theories, models and frameworks that provides a foundation of core knowledge – a “lay of the land”, so to speak, from which you can build a research study. For this reason, it’s usually presented fairly early within the literature review section of a dissertation, thesis or research paper .

Free Webinar: Literature Review 101

Let’s look at an example to make the theoretical framework a little more tangible.

If your research aims involve understanding what factors contributed toward people trusting investment brokers, you’d need to first lay down some theory so that it’s crystal clear what exactly you mean by this. For example, you would need to define what you mean by “trust”, as there are many potential definitions of this concept. The same would be true for any other constructs or variables of interest.

You’d also need to identify what existing theories have to say in relation to your research aim. In this case, you could discuss some of the key literature in relation to organisational trust. A quick search on Google Scholar using some well-considered keywords generally provides a good starting point.

foundation of theory

Typically, you’ll present your theoretical framework in written form , although sometimes it will make sense to utilise some visuals to show how different theories relate to each other. Your theoretical framework may revolve around just one major theory , or it could comprise a collection of different interrelated theories and models. In some cases, there will be a lot to cover and in some cases, not. Regardless of size, the theoretical framework is a critical ingredient in any study.

Simply put, the theoretical framework is the core foundation of theory that you’ll build your research upon. As we’ve mentioned many times on the blog, good research is developed by standing on the shoulders of giants . It’s extremely unlikely that your research topic will be completely novel and that there’ll be absolutely no existing theory that relates to it. If that’s the case, the most likely explanation is that you just haven’t reviewed enough literature yet! So, make sure that you take the time to review and digest the seminal sources.

Need a helping hand?

theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

A conceptual framework is typically a visual representation (although it can also be written out) of the expected relationships and connections between various concepts, constructs or variables. In other words, a conceptual framework visualises how the researcher views and organises the various concepts and variables within their study. This is typically based on aspects drawn from the theoretical framework, so there is a relationship between the two.

Quite commonly, conceptual frameworks are used to visualise the potential causal relationships and pathways that the researcher expects to find, based on their understanding of both the theoretical literature and the existing empirical research . Therefore, the conceptual framework is often used to develop research questions and hypotheses .

Let’s look at an example of a conceptual framework to make it a little more tangible. You’ll notice that in this specific conceptual framework, the hypotheses are integrated into the visual, helping to connect the rest of the document to the framework.

example of a conceptual framework

As you can see, conceptual frameworks often make use of different shapes , lines and arrows to visualise the connections and relationships between different components and/or variables. Ultimately, the conceptual framework provides an opportunity for you to make explicit your understanding of how everything is connected . So, be sure to make use of all the visual aids you can – clean design, well-considered colours and concise text are your friends.

Theoretical framework vs conceptual framework

As you can see, the theoretical framework and the conceptual framework are closely related concepts, but they differ in terms of focus and purpose. The theoretical framework is used to lay down a foundation of theory on which your study will be built, whereas the conceptual framework visualises what you anticipate the relationships between concepts, constructs and variables may be, based on your understanding of the existing literature and the specific context and focus of your research. In other words, they’re different tools for different jobs , but they’re neighbours in the toolbox.

Naturally, the theoretical framework and the conceptual framework are not mutually exclusive . In fact, it’s quite likely that you’ll include both in your dissertation or thesis, especially if your research aims involve investigating relationships between variables. Of course, every research project is different and universities differ in terms of their expectations for dissertations and theses, so it’s always a good idea to have a look at past projects to get a feel for what the norms and expectations are at your specific institution.

Want to learn more about research terminology, methods and techniques? Be sure to check out the rest of the Grad Coach blog . Alternatively, if you’re looking for hands-on help, have a look at our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the research process, step by step.

theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

Psst… there’s more (for free)

This post is part of our dissertation mini-course, which covers everything you need to get started with your dissertation, thesis or research project. 

14 Comments

CIPTA PRAMANA

Thank you for giving a valuable lesson

Muhammed Ebrahim Feto

good thanks!

Benson Wandago

VERY INSIGHTFUL

olawale rasaq

thanks for given very interested understand about both theoritical and conceptual framework

Tracey

I am researching teacher beliefs about inclusive education but not using a theoretical framework just conceptual frame using teacher beliefs, inclusive education and inclusive practices as my concepts

joshua

good, fantastic

Melese Takele

great! thanks for the clarification. I am planning to use both for my implementation evaluation of EmONC service at primary health care facility level. its theoretical foundation rooted from the principles of implementation science.

Dorcas

This is a good one…now have a better understanding of Theoretical and Conceptual frameworks. Highly grateful

Ahmed Adumani

Very educating and fantastic,good to be part of you guys,I appreciate your enlightened concern.

Lorna

Thanks for shedding light on these two t opics. Much clearer in my head now.

Cor

Simple and clear!

Alemayehu Wolde Oljira

The differences between the two topics was well explained, thank you very much!

Ntoks

Thank you great insight

Maria Glenda O. De Lara

Superb. Thank you so much.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

  • Print Friendly

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

  • Knowledge Base
  • Methodology
  • What Is a Conceptual Framework? | Tips & Examples

What Is a Conceptual Framework? | Tips & Examples

Published on August 2, 2022 by Bas Swaen and Tegan George. Revised on November 15, 2022.

Conceptual-Framework-example

A conceptual framework illustrates the expected relationship between your variables. It defines the relevant objectives for your research process and maps out how they come together to draw coherent conclusions.

Keep reading for a step-by-step guide to help you construct your own conceptual framework.

Table of contents

Developing a conceptual framework in research, step 1: choose your research question, step 2: select your independent and dependent variables, step 3: visualize your cause-and-effect relationship, step 4: identify other influencing variables, frequently asked questions about conceptual models.

A conceptual framework is a representation of the relationship you expect to see between your variables, or the characteristics or properties that you want to study.

Conceptual frameworks can be written or visual and are generally developed based on a literature review of existing studies about your topic.

Your research question guides your work by determining exactly what you want to find out, giving your research process a clear focus.

However, before you start collecting your data, consider constructing a conceptual framework. This will help you map out which variables you will measure and how you expect them to relate to one another.

In order to move forward with your research question and test a cause-and-effect relationship, you must first identify at least two key variables: your independent and dependent variables .

  • The expected cause, “hours of study,” is the independent variable (the predictor, or explanatory variable)
  • The expected effect, “exam score,” is the dependent variable (the response, or outcome variable).

Note that causal relationships often involve several independent variables that affect the dependent variable. For the purpose of this example, we’ll work with just one independent variable (“hours of study”).

Now that you’ve figured out your research question and variables, the first step in designing your conceptual framework is visualizing your expected cause-and-effect relationship.

We demonstrate this using basic design components of boxes and arrows. Here, each variable appears in a box. To indicate a causal relationship, each arrow should start from the independent variable (the cause) and point to the dependent variable (the effect).

Sample-conceptual-framework-using-an-independent-variable-and-a-dependent-variable

It’s crucial to identify other variables that can influence the relationship between your independent and dependent variables early in your research process.

Some common variables to include are moderating, mediating, and control variables.

Moderating variables

Moderating variable (or moderators) alter the effect that an independent variable has on a dependent variable. In other words, moderators change the “effect” component of the cause-and-effect relationship.

Let’s add the moderator “IQ.” Here, a student’s IQ level can change the effect that the variable “hours of study” has on the exam score. The higher the IQ, the fewer hours of study are needed to do well on the exam.

Sample-conceptual-framework-with-a-moderator-variable

Let’s take a look at how this might work. The graph below shows how the number of hours spent studying affects exam score. As expected, the more hours you study, the better your results. Here, a student who studies for 20 hours will get a perfect score.

Figure-effect-without-moderator

But the graph looks different when we add our “IQ” moderator of 120. A student with this IQ will achieve a perfect score after just 15 hours of study.

Figure-effect-with-moderator-iq-120

Below, the value of the “IQ” moderator has been increased to 150. A student with this IQ will only need to invest five hours of study in order to get a perfect score.

Figure-effect-with-moderator-iq-150

Here, we see that a moderating variable does indeed change the cause-and-effect relationship between two variables.

Mediating variables

Now we’ll expand the framework by adding a mediating variable . Mediating variables link the independent and dependent variables, allowing the relationship between them to be better explained.

Here’s how the conceptual framework might look if a mediator variable were involved:

Conceptual-framework-mediator-variable

In this case, the mediator helps explain why studying more hours leads to a higher exam score. The more hours a student studies, the more practice problems they will complete; the more practice problems completed, the higher the student’s exam score will be.

Moderator vs. mediator

It’s important not to confuse moderating and mediating variables. To remember the difference, you can think of them in relation to the independent variable:

  • A moderating variable is not affected by the independent variable, even though it affects the dependent variable. For example, no matter how many hours you study (the independent variable), your IQ will not get higher.
  • A mediating variable is affected by the independent variable. In turn, it also affects the dependent variable. Therefore, it links the two variables and helps explain the relationship between them.

Control variables

Lastly,  control variables must also be taken into account. These are variables that are held constant so that they don’t interfere with the results. Even though you aren’t interested in measuring them for your study, it’s crucial to be aware of as many of them as you can be.

Conceptual-framework-control-variable

A mediator variable explains the process through which two variables are related, while a moderator variable affects the strength and direction of that relationship.

A confounding variable is closely related to both the independent and dependent variables in a study. An independent variable represents the supposed cause , while the dependent variable is the supposed effect . A confounding variable is a third variable that influences both the independent and dependent variables.

Failing to account for confounding variables can cause you to wrongly estimate the relationship between your independent and dependent variables.

Yes, but including more than one of either type requires multiple research questions .

For example, if you are interested in the effect of a diet on health, you can use multiple measures of health: blood sugar, blood pressure, weight, pulse, and many more. Each of these is its own dependent variable with its own research question.

You could also choose to look at the effect of exercise levels as well as diet, or even the additional effect of the two combined. Each of these is a separate independent variable .

To ensure the internal validity of an experiment , you should only change one independent variable at a time.

A control variable is any variable that’s held constant in a research study. It’s not a variable of interest in the study, but it’s controlled because it could influence the outcomes.

A confounding variable , also called a confounder or confounding factor, is a third variable in a study examining a potential cause-and-effect relationship.

A confounding variable is related to both the supposed cause and the supposed effect of the study. It can be difficult to separate the true effect of the independent variable from the effect of the confounding variable.

In your research design , it’s important to identify potential confounding variables and plan how you will reduce their impact.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Swaen, B. & George, T. (2022, November 15). What Is a Conceptual Framework? | Tips & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/conceptual-framework/

Is this article helpful?

Bas Swaen

Other students also liked

Independent vs. dependent variables | definition & examples, mediator vs. moderator variables | differences & examples, control variables | what are they & why do they matter, what is your plagiarism score.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • MedEdPORTAL

Logo of mededportal

Applying Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks to Health Professions Education Research: An Introductory Workshop

Steven rougas.

1 Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine and Medical Science and Director, Doctoring Program, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Andrea Berry

2 Executive Director of Faculty Life, University of Central Florida College of Medicine

S. Beth Bierer

3 Director of Assessment and Evaluation and Professor of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University

Rebecca D. Blanchard

4 Director of Faculty Development, OnlineMedEd, and Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate

Anna T. Cianciolo

5 Associate Professor, Department of Medical Education, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Jorie M. Colbert-Getz

6 Assistant Dean of Education Quality Improvement and Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine

Heeyoung Han

7 Associate Professor and Director of Postdoctoral Program, Department of Medical Education, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Kaitlin Lipner

8 Second-Year Resident, Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Cayla R. Teal

9 Associate Dean for Assessment and Evaluation and Education Associate Professor of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine

Associated Data

  • Workshop Slides.pptx
  • Facilitators’ Guide.docx
  • Participant Worksheet.docx
  • Workshop Evaluation.docx

All appendices are peer reviewed as integral parts of the Original Publication.

Introduction

Literature suggests that the quality and rigor of health professions education (HPE) research can be elevated if the research is anchored in existing theories and frameworks. This critical skill is difficult for novice researchers to master. We created a workshop to introduce the practical application of theories and frameworks to HPE research.

We conducted two 60- to 75-minute workshops, one in 2019 at an in-person national conference and another in 2021 during an online national education conference. After a brief role-play introduction, participants applied a relevant theory to a case scenario in small groups, led by facilitators with expertise in HPE research. The workshop concluded with a presentation on applying the lessons learned when preparing a scholarly manuscript. We conducted a postworkshop survey to measure self-reported achievement of objectives.

Fifty-five individuals participated in the in-person workshop, and approximately 150 people completed the online workshop. Sixty participants (30%) completed the postworkshop survey across both workshops. As a result of participating in the workshop, 80% of participants (32) indicated they could distinguish between frameworks and theories, and 86% (32) could apply a conceptual or theoretical framework to a research question. Strengths of the workshop included the small-group activity, access to expert facilitators, and the materials provided.

The workshop has been well received by participants and fills a gap in the existing resources available to HPE researchers and mentors. It can be replicated in multiple settings to model the application of conceptual and theoretical frameworks to HPE research.

Educational Objectives

By the end of this activity, learners will be able to:

  • 1. Describe conceptual and theoretical frameworks commonly used in health professions education research.
  • 2. Examine how the selection of a framework affects research design.
  • 3. Discuss strategies for presenting results relative to a conceptual or theoretical framework.

Calls for improved rigor in health professions education (HPE) research have often focused on the need to incorporate theoretical and conceptual frameworks in research design, implementation, and reflective critique. 1 , 2 Theories, which explain how/why things are related to each other, and frameworks, which explain where a study originates and the implications on study design, are critical for conducting high-quality HPE research, yet many researchers struggle to apply them. 3 Ideally, conceptual or theoretical frameworks should provide a lens through which to identify gaps in the literature, operationalize constructs, hypothesize relationships, and design appropriate methodology. 4 Frameworks allow researchers to deepen their understanding of how societies, organizations, and people interact 5 and can help HPE researchers engage in the adequate preparation needed for a scholarly inquiry. 6

A robust literature emphasizes the importance of anchoring HPE research in existing theories and frameworks. 7 – 9 Frameworks ideally should be used early to influence the what (content) and the how (methodology) of a research project and then revisited to help situate the results. 10 Recent attention to terminology 11 and application 1 , 12 , 13 has provided additional resources to support HPE researchers. Yet selection and application of a suitable conceptual or theoretical framework are still underutilized, and the lack of such frameworks is a common reason for manuscript rejection in major HPE journals. 14

One reason for poor utilization may be a lack of consensus on how HPE researchers define theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. 11 Despite references to conceptual and theoretical frameworks in reviews of manuscripts and grant submissions, there is a surprising absence of consistency in how these terms are used. After a review of relevant literature, we agreed upon the following focused definitions to guide our work:

  • 1. Theory: an explanation of how/why things are related to each other.
  • 2. Theoretical framework: the implications of the theory for study design.
  • 3. Conceptual framework: the conceptual heritage (i.e., the central concepts used in a field of study) of the problem to be studied.

Another reason for poor utilization is inconsistent application of these concepts. The volume of theoretical and conceptual frameworks applicable to HPE research can be overwhelming, 15 and researchers often see framework selection as the end product of their effort rather than an initial step. The framework should resonate with the researcher and the conceptual heritage of the project 16 and be used in every part of the research process from development of the research question and methodology to analysis of the results and discussion of study findings. 12 , 13 Researchers often lose sight of this guiding principle once the theory or framework is selected.

A final reason may be the fact that many educators have received minimal training in HPE research, particularly the incorporation of conceptual or theoretical frameworks to guide such work. While faculty development programs have begun to address this need, the majority of such programs still tend to focus on teaching and learning topics. 17 To improve HPE research quality, considerable training in research methods must occur. 18 Though various workshops exist to expose HPE researchers to principles of scholarly writing, 19 method design, 20 statistics, 21 and academic career development, 22 there remains a gap in the knowledge and skills needed to apply conceptual and theoretical frameworks.

As members of the AAMC's Medical Education Scholarship Research and Evaluation (MESRE) section of the Group on Educational Affairs (GEA) who provide mentorship, consultation, and critical review for various HPE research projects locally, regionally, and nationally, we recognized the need for a structured professional development opportunity for novice researchers to learn application of these concepts. The goal of our project was to develop an interactive, case-based workshop to explore the application of conceptual and theoretical frameworks to HPE research.

Workshop Design

We designed this workshop for HPE researchers seeking guidance on how to apply conceptual and theoretical frameworks. The workshop included an introductory video role-play, small-group discussion of a case, and large-group debriefing. Although the case scenario used in the workshop featured educators studying written narrative feedback in undergraduate medical education, the workshop could appeal to any HPE researcher wishing to gain experience with using conceptual and theoretical frameworks. Participants did not need prerequisite knowledge of theories in order to achieve the workshop objectives.

The workshop planners included educators serving on the MESRE steering committee in 2019. All had experience mentoring others on how to use conceptual and theoretical frameworks, and a subset served on HPE journal editorial boards or as peer reviewers. We designed workshop materials and participated in the workshop as a featured speaker and/or small-group facilitator.

We developed the workshop to be offered in person at a conference and later adapted it to be presented virtually. We initially designed the workshop as a 75-minute session but learned, during the second offering, that 60 minutes provided sufficient time to meet the workshop objectives. When offering the workshop in a face-to-face venue, we used a large conference room with projection equipment and internet access to display slides and videos. The conference room had to have enough tables for participants to work in small groups of five to 10. When conducting the session virtually, we selected a platform that enabled the workshop facilitator to assign participants to breakout rooms and permitted small-group facilitators to share their screens with workshop participants.

We had a main facilitator for the workshop and several small-group facilitators for the small-group work. All facilitators reviewed information on situated learning theory (SLT), as this theory was used in the workshop case scenario. Facilitators also needed experience with using theory to inform the elaboration of research questions, the design of research projects, and the interpretation of research findings. Ideally, facilitators had experience with publishing peer-reviewed manuscripts including conceptual or theoretical frameworks and came from any HPE field. While it would be possible to run the workshop without all these essential skills, we highly recommend recruiting small-group facilitators with them. We also advise having at least one facilitator for every 10 workshop participants. The lesson plan and timeline for the workshop are outlined in Table 1 .

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mep_2374-8265.11286-t001.jpg

Preworkshop Preparation

We conducted a training session (approximately 45–60 minutes) with small-group facilitators prior to the workshop to review the workshop slides ( Appendix A ) and facilitation strategies for the case discussion ( Appendix B ).

Introduction (2 Minutes)

When feasible, participants were asked to introduce themselves at the beginning of the workshop. Following introductions, the workshop's learning objectives were presented. We kept the workshop overview short, as the first video vignette contextualized the workshop topic.

Video Vignette 1 (5 Minutes)

After introducing the session objectives, the main facilitator played a recorded role-play ( Appendix A , slide 4) demonstrating a conversation between a mentor and mentee about the importance of selecting a theory to guide the design of a research project. This case scenario provided participants with an authentic example emphasizing the importance of selecting an appropriate theory to publish a research project in HPE journals.

Define Key Terms (2 Minutes)

The main facilitator proceeded to define the key terms—conceptual framework, theory, and theoretical framework—mentioned in the role-play ( Appendix A , slides 5–6). Participants may not have fully recognized the distinction between a theoretical framework and conceptual framework at this point in the workshop.

Video Vignette 2 (3 Minutes)

The main facilitator showed a second recording of the role-play ( Appendix A , slide 7) to illustrate how theory contributes to the interpretation of key findings and, after the video, discussed how one's point of view could frame the ways in which one examined problems ( Appendix A , slides 8–11). Building upon the earlier case vignette scenario, the main facilitator presented a worked example to demonstrate how the theory of planned behavior could apply to the feedback study featured in the video vignette ( Appendix A , slides 12–13).

Small-Group Activity (25–30 Minutes)

Participants formed small groups of five to 10 (or joined breakout rooms) for a 30-minute small-group activity designed to apply a different theory to the case scenario. Small-group facilitators began the session by reviewing the key features of SLT summarized on the participant worksheet ( Appendix C ). Subsequently, small-group facilitators guided the small groups to think about how the research question provided could be refined using SLT and helped them consider how SLT could guide research design including study participants, setting, data sources, and data collection strategies. Before the small-group activity concluded, each small-group facilitator asked about any remaining questions or tips the participants wanted to share with the larger group and recorded these responses for subsequent large-group discussion.

Debriefing and Wrap-up (12 Minutes)

The main facilitator reconvened all small groups and reviewed guiding questions participants had discussed during the small-group activity. Small-group facilitators presented the remaining questions and tips their groups had identified. The main facilitator then concluded by presenting a journal editor's discussion of how these concepts applied to manuscripts and editorial review ( Appendix A , slides 15–19). Participants completed a workshop evaluation ( Appendix D ) at the end of the session.

Workshop Evaluation and Analysis

We developed the workshop evaluation ( Appendix D ) to assess the workshop's effectiveness and gather information to improve the workshop. For effectiveness questions, participants used a 3-point scale (“was able to do prior to workshop,” “am able to do as a result of the workshop,” and “unable to perform”) to rate their ability to perform workshop objectives. The workshop evaluation included four open-ended items (“What are the key points/messages you will take away?”, “How will you use them?”, “What did or did not work well and why?”, and “Please provide us with any additional comments about the session”) to identify strengths of the workshop as well as areas for improvement. For the virtual session, we also asked participants to rate their level of engagement with the large-group and breakout-room components. We calculated frequencies for scaled items using Microsoft Excel and analyzed written comments for major themes. We were particularly interested in determining the percentage of participants who could meet each workshop objective as a result of the workshop versus those who could not meet the objective; therefore, we included only those who selected these options in the denominator of the frequency calculation. Those who could meet an objective prior to the workshop were excluded from the calculations, as our goal was to guide those who lacked a skill prior to attending the workshop. We used a paper evaluation form for the face-to-face offering and an electronic form for the virtual session. We also included an item on engagement for the virtual offering, as there were fewer cues provided to facilitators in the online setting.

The workshop was delivered in person at Learn Serve Lead: the AAMC Annual Meeting in November 2019 and virtually at the GEA Regional Spring Meeting in April 2021. Workshop participants were medical school staff, faculty, and administrators. Fifty-five attendees participated in the in-person workshop, and approximately 150 participants participated in the virtual workshop. The postworkshop survey was completed by 26 individuals from the in-person session (47%) and 34 from the virtual session (23%).

Table 2 provides the frequency of participants’ self-reported ability to perform the workshop objectives relative to not being able to perform them. As a result of participating in the workshop, 80% of the included participants (32) indicated they could distinguish between conceptual frameworks and theories, 86% (32) could apply a conceptual or theoretical framework to a research question, 79% (34) could analyze how the selection of a conceptual or theoretical framework impacts research design, and 68% (27) could evaluate the results of a study through the lens of a conceptual or theoretical framework ( Figure ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mep_2374-8265.11286-t002.jpg

Participant comments on what did and did not work well and why were categorized by workshop elements, and frequencies for each element were computed based on terms referring to strengths or areas for improvement. The majority of comments highlighted strengths of the workshop, including the small-group/breakout activity (12 participants), having expert facilitators (nine participants), the role-play (seven participants), and the handouts (seven participants). Other positive aspects were the large-group discussion (four participants), use of examples (four participants), and time for questions (two participants). Participants felt the small-group activity, expert facilitators, and role-playing worked well because they were active, hands-on activities. A few participants mentioned areas for improvement, including small-group variability (seven participants), additional terms needing definitions (four participants), overall complexity of the topic (two participants), and wanting more resources (two participants).

Thirty-four virtual workshop participants rated the overall engagement of the large-group presentation and small-group (breakout-room) discussion. The large-group presentation was rated as highly engaging (53%, 18) or engaging (35%, 12) by 88% of participants. The small-group discussion was rated as highly engaging (71%, 24) or engaging (9%, 3) by 80% of participants.

This workshop enabled participants to work in small groups with a facilitator to apply a theory to an example research question and discuss the implications of the effort. The workshop was well received by participants, who mostly reported self-improvement regarding each of the learning objectives and valued the small-group activity, work with facilitators, and observation of the role-play. For facilitators, the workshop offered a unique opportunity to focus teaching on the application of a theoretical or conceptual framework, separate from other aspects of HPE research mentorship. The materials included here provide an accessible avenue for HPE research champions to engage novice researchers at their own institutions in a skill that is challenging to learn and to teach.

Our reflections presented valuable insight on the preparation and execution of a workshop designed to teach about a complex and typically unfamiliar topic. While careful selection of a facilitator and thoughtful preparation of materials generally result in better experiences for learners, in this workshop, those details are particularly important.

The workshop has been designed for novice HPE researchers. As a result, learner questions can be oversimplified, while the answers are nuanced. Facilitators must be able to navigate these conversations as well as hold reasonable goals for the development of learners on this complex topic. Appropriate facilitators for this workshop include those who are comfortable using frameworks in their own research and coaching/mentoring others. Being familiar with more than one theory or conceptual framework that could apply to the case scenario is particularly valuable, as the ability to compare and contrast frameworks is helpful for answering questions and reframing complex answers in an accessible way. Conducting the workshop virtually may assist in recruiting qualified small-group facilitators from other departments or institutions. Prior to each session, facilitators should meet virtually to discuss the facilitators’ guide ( Appendix B ). This allows for discussion of the case vignette and consensus on how to approach potential questions or roadblocks.

We found that small groups struggling to address the discussion questions often did not spend an adequate amount of time exploring SLT in the beginning of the small-group activity. Though we provided a paragraph of text and references describing the theory ( Appendices B and C ), a visual schema could simplify some of the connections and give novice researchers a clearer, more succinct way into the conversation. One potential approach is to use some of the small-group time to develop the schema with participants.

Similarly, comparing the application of one theory to another provides insight into how a study can be viewed through multiple lenses. While many of our facilitators employed this approach, it proved challenging given the timing. One potential approach is to use the theory of planned behavior (reviewed in the introductory slides, Appendix A ) as the comparative theory since it has already been referenced.

The small-group exercise was rated the most valuable. Discussions and pacing varied due to participants’ knowledge and comfort with speaking up and facilitators’ ability to manage the conversation. Therefore, we recommend ensuring adequate time for completing the small-group activity. Specifically, we recommend facilitators be mindful of how much time is allotted to reviewing the theory compared to the amount allotted for the discussion. We suggest sending out the background information on SLT in advance, so that participants have a chance to review the key information prior to the workshop.

We also suggest tailoring the description of the workshop and learning objectives in order to invite the appropriate audience. This may mean novice researchers who have engaged with research or who are currently planning research. Participants do not need to have the same level of knowledge entering the workshop, but because of the emphasis on small-group discussion, wide variation in participants’ knowledge may result in some not obtaining the insight they need to meet the learning objectives.

A common refrain from workshop participants was how to select the right answers to the discussion questions rather than trying to understand how the theory selected impacted the research question. This likely stemmed from a common misconception that there was only one right theory or framework for a research study. Confronting this expectation early in the session (in both the introduction and the small-group activity) is key.

Workshops are inherently limiting in that they can accommodate only a small number of learners. However, given the complexity of this topic, the small number of learners may improve the experience, as conversation can be guided towards specific learner gaps.

This workshop has additional limitations; however, with thoughtful preparation, they can be addressed to ensure a valuable learning experience. First, the workshop requires strong facilitators, which limits workshop size for institutions without access to experienced facilitators. Second, the amount of time needed to complete the workshop requires facilitators to pay careful attention to workshop timing. Third, small-group experiences can vary considerably with facilitator expertise and familiarity with SLT. Thoughtful recruitment and training of facilitators, perhaps relying on experienced facilitators to train new ones, will maximize participant benefit.

Finally, the evaluation data we collected postsession did not adequately account for knowledge or skills that participants had prior to the workshop. While the anecdotal feedback was that most participants were not very knowledgeable or skilled, a pre/post design would have helped clarify this issue. The rating scale forced participants to mark effectiveness items as being performable either prior to or as a result of the workshop. This did not take into account that some participants had prior knowledge or skill and still benefited from the workshop, making interpretation of the responses less clear. Additionally, the evaluation response rate was low, especially for the virtual session, and may not represent the perspectives of all participants.

This workshop has the potential to increase the application of theories and frameworks in HPE research. Frameworks are helpful to organize studies in the context of a greater conversation but are difficult to learn outside of formal educational programs. The workshop enables novice HPE researchers to explore how they might begin integrating frameworks into their work and why doing so is important.

The workshop provides scaffolding for HPE research mentors to introduce frameworks to novice and emerging researchers, and the materials included constitute a valuable reference. In addition, workshops like this one provide support and structure for institutions with few HPE research mentors. Future directions should focus on increasing accessibility of this information to more HPE researchers through the creation of an interactive, online session and a searchable repository of theories and frameworks commonly used in HPE research.

Disclosures

None to report.

Funding/Support

Prior presentations.

Rougas S, Berry A, Bierer B, et al. Practical approaches to applying conceptual and theoretical frameworks to medical education research: a MESRE session. Presented at: Learn Serve Lead: the AAMC Annual Meeting; November 8–12, 2019; Phoenix, AZ.

Rougas S, Berry A, Bierer B, et al. Practical approaches to applying conceptual and theoretical frameworks to medical education research. Presented virtually at: Group on Educational Affairs Regional Spring Meeting; April 20–22, 2021.

Ethical Approval

Reported as not applicable.

  • Library databases
  • Library website

Theories and Frameworks: Introduction

Theoretical & conceptual frameworks.

The terms theoretical framework and conceptual framework are often used interchangeably to mean the same thing. Although they are both used to understand a research problem and guide the development, collection, and analysis of research, it's important to understand the difference between the two. When working on coursework or dissertation research, make sure to clarify what is being asked and any specific course or program requirements. 

Theoretical framework 

A theoretical framework is a single formal theory. When a study is designed around a theoretical framework, the theory is the primary means in which the research problem is understood and investigated. Although theoretical frameworks tend to be used in quantitative studies, you will also see this approach in qualitative research.  

Conceptual framework

A conceptual framework includes one or more formal theories (in part or whole) as well as other concepts and empirical findings from the literature. It is used to show relationships among these ideas and how they relate to the research study. Conceptual frameworks are commonly seen in qualitative research in the social and behavioral sciences, for example, because often one theory cannot fully address the phenomena being studied.

Investigate theory

Identifying and learning about theories requires a different search strategy than other types of research. Even though the steps are different, you will still use many of the same skills and tools you’ve used for other library research.

  • psychology:  human development, cognition, personality, motivation
  • sociology:  social change, race, class, gender
  • business:  leadership, management
  • health:  patient care, well-being, environment
  • course textbooks
  • encyclopedias and handbooks
  • credible websites

Theory in doctoral research

Identifying a theory that aligns with your dissertation or doctoral study takes time. It’s never too early to start exploratory research. The process of identifying an appropriate theory can seem daunting, so try breaking down the process into smaller steps.

  • your theory courses
  • completed dissertations and doctoral studies
  • the scholarly literature on your topic
  • Keep a list of theories and take notes on how and why they were used.
  • Identify and learn more about relevant theories.
  • Locate influential and seminal works  related to those theories.
  • Next Page: Discover Theories
  • Office of Student Disability Services

Walden Resources

Departments.

  • Academic Residencies
  • Academic Skills
  • Career Planning and Development
  • Customer Care Team
  • Field Experience
  • Military Services
  • Student Success Advising
  • Writing Skills

Centers and Offices

  • Center for Social Change
  • Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services
  • Office of Degree Acceleration
  • Office of Research and Doctoral Services
  • Office of Student Affairs

Student Resources

  • Doctoral Writing Assessment
  • Form & Style Review
  • Quick Answers
  • ScholarWorks
  • SKIL Courses and Workshops
  • Walden Bookstore
  • Walden Catalog & Student Handbook
  • Student Safety/Title IX
  • Legal & Consumer Information
  • Website Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Accreditation
  • State Authorization
  • Net Price Calculator
  • Contact Walden

Walden University is a member of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. www.adtalem.com Walden University is certified to operate by SCHEV © 2024 Walden University LLC. All rights reserved.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

Theoretical Framework

Profile image of William Kerns

A PPT from class discussion introducing the theoretical framework in research.

Related Papers

TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa

Gerrit Van der Waldt

Research in the social sciences is concerned with complex social behaviour, group dynamics and unique human settings. Researchers have different patterns of thought and modes of thinking. As such, they often use different words to explain phenomena, thereby causing conceptual confusion. This article explains how conceptual frameworks can help overcome such confusion by serving as visual organising tools and mental maps to direct and guide research. By using a descriptive approach, the article aims firstly, to outline the necessity, purpose, nature and scope of conceptual frameworks in social science research, and secondly, provide a 'how-to' guide on the design of such a framework, by exploring a practical example. The results illustrate conclusively the significant contribution that conceptual frameworks can and should make in social science research.

theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

Patrick Ngulube

In this chapter, we consider two research frameworks: conceptual and theoretical. The chapter complements and questions the existing conversations around the theoretical and conceptual perspectives that inform the research process. Thus, the intent in the chapter is both edifying and therapeutic. Although Bak (2004:17) posits that there are a variety of ways of crafting a theoretical framework, for the most part, this chapter will enable researchers to overcome theoretical struggles and appreciate how a research framework might assist them to “interpret and understand the findings of research” within a research framework which makes ‘“sense’ of the data” (May, 1993:20). Some authors acknowledge three types of research frameworks, namely, theoretical, practical (Scriven, 1986) and conceptual (Eisenhart, 1991), although practical frameworks are beyond the scope of this chapter. You will find this chapter useful if you are a postgraduate researcher, a research supervisor, or examiner of theses, as it will assist you to come to terms with the fundamental aspects of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in their diversity, richness and depth. The primary aim is to provide researchers like you, with tools for understanding such analytical research devices in order to appreciate their role and function in social inquiry.

MAGNT Research Report

Malik B Alazzam

The aim of this study is to contrast and combine results from different studies using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology(UTAUT2) and its extensions, in the hopefulness of identifying patterns among studied results, sources of discrepancy among those results, or other existing relationships that may come to light in the context of these study. Studies from which this paper was prepared were derived from Emerald, Science Direct, EBSCOhost databases. Out of 17 studies gleaned 2 were on education, 2 on social, 4 were on mobile, 2 were on the consumer, 2 were on the web, 3 were on Health, 1 were on banking and 1 were on different forms. Results from these studies are varied. This paper tabulate thematically and chronologically literature where the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) have been applied. The review identified the Topic, Author, Sample Size, and Location where the study have been carried and theoretical model used. It also includes the Statistical techniques applied, the objectives of the study and the results.

Jennifer Whittal , Simon Hull

SUMMARY Although there is a published lack of accepted frameworks and methodologies for the comparison and evaluation of national land administration systems, several frameworks for assessing the performance of LAS in terms of different aspects of these systems have been proposed. The bulk are biased towards analysis of technical, institutional, or cost/benefit aspects, or focus on economic efficiency and effectiveness. There is a dearth of frameworks for evaluating the external impact of land administration and cadastral developments, i.e. how do these developments affect citizens and communities having rights in land? This paper constitutes a review of recently published frameworks related to land administration and cadastral development. The underlying theories are explored and frameworks are identified as belonging to two general groups: those providing recommendations or guidelines, and those providing a hierarchical analysis that conforms to the general structure of evaluation frameworks. This latter category is further explored in terms of the motivations for development of the framework and three subgroups are identified: those that address a gap in knowledge, those that address issues related specifically to developing contexts, and those with a pro-poor and good governance focus. Finally key lessons are drawn from the reviewed publications. It is proposed that land administration systems should be developed in such a way that they can become successful, sustainable, and significant. To this end good leadership is seen as very important, as are public participation, the (temporary) adoption of fit-for-purpose standards, a focus on providing secure tenure, and good governance. The theoretical underpinning for development should be adaptation or unified theories, not formalisation or replacement theory.

Ewnetu Tamene

The impetus of this paper is the irreplaceable role yet confusing use of the term " conceptual framework " in research literature. Even though, there is a consensus among scholars of various field of study that conceptual framework is essential element of research endeavors, yet it is used interchangeably with theoretical framework, that create confusion. As a PhD student on the pre-proposal work, this makes me more anxious. Then my intent is to explore its conceptual meaning and purposes by bringing together similar meanings from different scholars with a view to shed some light on its understanding and its use in research. Hence, in attempting to address this, the following key terms; Concept, conceptual framework research design and theoretical framework are defined briefly as to help decipher the conceptual ties among them and illuminate the conceptual meaning and purpose of conceptual framework. The schematic representation of conceptual framework is developed based on the conceptual meaning provided by scholars. In doing this it is attempted to show conceptual meaning of conceptual framework in relation to research design, paradigms and philosophical assumptions that delineate it from theoretical framework. Conceptual framework serves essential role in inductive research design, while theoretical framework serves similar role in deductive research design.

During my internship at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA), my focus was on a self managed research project finding the ways how European and Israeli media frame their news coverage about the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Abstract: This research focused on the ways European and Israeli media frame their news about the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign (BDS). The goal is to find out if there are any significant similarities or differences. The phenomenon of BDS is an interesting topic for research because it has a very controversial nature. Proponents of BDS strive to boycott Israel, based on accusations of occupation, ethnic cleansing and Apartheid practices against the Palestinians. However, opponents fight against BDS based on accusations of double standards, destructive intentions and ethnic or racial discrimination motivated by anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. The main question central in this research was to find out how the media perceptions of BDS in Europe compared to Israel relate to each other.

Dimitrios Zygolanis

The OLI framework, also known as the eclectic paradigm, was introduced by John Dunning in order to explain the rationale behind a firm’s decision to internationalize its activity. It has been a salient component of the international business ever since its inception and it has been updated along its existence in order to retain its significance. Breakthroughs in information and communication technology have impacted the business environment and have produced changes in all sectors, at a higher level than any other factor. In this paper we try to show that, in spite of the changes that have unquestionably affected it, the eclectic paradigm retains its validity and could still be used for explaining international firm’s behavior. In order to accomplish our endeavor, we perform an extensive systematic literature review on the topics of digitalization and the eclectic paradigm. Our findings suggest that although the components of the eclectic paradigm are very different than they were at the time of its inception, the OLI framework is elastic enough to embrace change, thus it appears to retain its validity and can still represent a useful tool.

Siti Nor Amalina Ahmad Tajuddin

This thesis investigates the construction of ‘national unity’ within the culturally diverse society of Malaysia. The main contribution of this thesis is to provide a nuanced framing approach to the analysis of PSAs and participants’ viewpoints, and thus, extend the previous work on the construction of ‘national unity’ in Malaysia that primarily focused on the elites, rather than the views of grassroots ethnic groups. Through constructionist qualitative methodology, the Government’s construction of ‘national unity’ discovered two dominate: nationalism frame and multiculturalism frames, while audience’s construction of ‘national contested these frames at times and added a different, oppositional frame: political frame.

Theory underpins social science endeavours by providing the philosophical assumptions on the following aspects: aspects that constitute social reality (ontology); is accepted as valid evidence of that reality (epistemology); the means to investigate the context (methodology); and the manner in which evidence is gathered (methods). Both positivists and interpretivists generally concur that theory occupies a central role in scientific inquiry into the social world. In disciplines of applied social science such as Public Administration, research generally fosters the transition from theory to practice. In this respect, theory underlies the designs, methods, and findings of the research process.

Rachel E Short

The ballet Fancy Free premiered at the Metropolitan Opera House in 1944, marking the beginning of the creative collaboration between composer Leonard Bernstein and choreographer Jerome Robbins. This paper presents a choreomusical analysis of the ballet exploring the intertwining relationships between music and dance. I argue that the complementary metric and rhythmic choices create unique characterizations for each of the three sailors’ solo variations in the sixth movement. The placement and repetition of rhythmic and choreographic phrases distinguish the personalities of each sailor. Building on recent discussions by music theorists and dance scholars, my analysis aligns the dance steps alongside musical analysis to see how they inform each other, paying close attention to choreographic and musical accents. The energetic first variation features the acrobatic, gregarious sailor, and the tension between choreographic and musical phrases depicts a man of vigor. I focus on the second variation, which while titled “Waltz” is not in a pure triple meter. I illustrate how the choreography can confirm or contradict the waltz topic, portraying the sailor’s unassuming playfulness. The third movement is the most metrically straightforward and the choreography matches effortlessly with the main motives, providing a slick characterization for the group’s suave leader. I take this in-depth look at the Fancy Free variations to illustrate how choreo-musical analysis can enrich our understanding of the synergy of music and movement. Also presented at Music Theory Midwest’s 26th annual conference, Oakland University, MI (2015), honorable mention for the Arthur J. Komar Award

RELATED PAPERS

Seidu Ibrahim

Kai Hakkarainen

Studies in Sociology of Science

Iheriohanma E. B. J.

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Ree Meertens , Diána Bánáti

Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Business Management and Administration at Stellenbosch University

Deon Cloete

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

Yukiko Asami-Johansson , Iiris Attorps

Yukiko Asami-Johansson

Jaime Alfredo Cabrera

Robert Brooks

Gihan Osman

Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies

Ronald O Mensah

Belete Hiruy

Neera Handa

John W Hammond

Jack Walton

Integrated Manufacturing Systems

Harry de Boer

Innovations in Education &# 38; …

Vernon Trafford , Prof Shosh Leshem

Mohammad Torabi

Organization Science

Marcos Barros , mireille lalancette

Stefanie Di Russo

© United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2019

ANDRES CASAS CASAS

Geoffrey Holtzman

… of the IIMA

Catherine Flick

lakshmi harshutha

Jacqueline Batchelor

Kay Colthorpe , Susan Rowland , Joan Leach , Merryn McKinnon , Simon Lancaster , Emma Bartle

Catherine Walter

Teemu Suorsa

TAHIR IQBAL

PhD Dissertation

Accounting, Management and Information Technologies

Rudy Hirschheim

Albert Mills

Qualitative Report

Anna S . CohenMiller

corazon morilla

Erich N. Pitcher

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

developing the theoretical and conceptual framework

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework

Jul 14, 2014

310 likes | 731 Views

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework. J199 lecture, R.E.Khan. Theory. Theories are constructed in order to explain, predict and master phenomena (e.g. relationships, events, or the behavior). In many instances we are constructing models of reality.

Share Presentation

  • theoretical framework
  • media content
  • foreign news segments
  • identify variables
  • quantitative data

aysel

Presentation Transcript

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework J199 lecture, R.E.Khan

Theory Theories are constructed in order to explain, predict and master phenomena (e.g. relationships, events, or the behavior). In many instances we are constructing models of reality. A theory makes generalizations about observations and consists of an interrelated, coherent set of ideas and models.

Formulating the Theoretical Framework The theoretical framework of the study is a structure that can hold or support a theory of a research work. It presents the theory which explains why the problem under study exists. Thus, the theoretical framework is but a theory that serves as a basis for conducting research.

Formulating the Theoretical Framework • Purpose: • It helps the researcher see clearly the variables of the study; • It can provide him with a general framework for data analysis; • It is essential in preparing a research proposal using descriptive and experimental methods.

For example: Thesis examines the gatekeeping, news selection and reportage of world news in leading Philippine dailies and primetime newscasts. Basic theory 1 Media Organization, Selection, and Production. McQuail’s theory on media as an institution takes into account all forces that affect media’s performance. (After: Littlejohn, 1992)

For example: Basic theory 2 Selective Gatekeeping. Galtung and Ruge selective gatekeeping theory suggests that news from around the world are evaluated using news values to determine their newsworthiness. (After Mc Quail and Windahl 1993, p. 166)

For example: Basic theory 3 Model of the Agenda Setting Theory. Malcolm McCombs and Donald Shaw’s theory simply states that the issues given most attention by the media will be perceived as the most important. (Before: McQuail and Windahl 1993)

For example: Combined theory Integrated Theoretical Framework. The integrated theoretical framework shows how media content is shaped by pressures to the media organization, selective gatekeeping and agenda setting.

Based on the foregoing example, how should the theoretical framework formulated? • specifies the theory used as basis for the study • mentions the proponents of the theory • cites the main points emphasized in the theory • Supports his exposition of the theory by ideas from other experts; • illustrates his theoretical framework by means of a diagram; and, • reiterates his theoretical proposition in the study.

Concept After formulating the theoretical framework, the researcher has to develop the conceptual framework of the study. A concept is an image or symbolic representation of an abstract idea. Chinn and Kramer (1999) define a concept as a “complex mental formulation of experience”. While the theoretical framework is the theory on which the study is based, the conceptual framework is the operationalization of the theory.

Conceptual framework It is the researcher’s own position on the problem and gives direction to the study. It may be an adaptation of a model used in a previous study, with modifications to suit the inquiry. Aside from showing the direction of the study, through the conceptual framework, the researcher can be able to show the relationships of the different constructs that he wants to investigate.

Conceptual Framework Conceptual Framework. News values, and the pressures and constraints shape the newspapers and television newscasts. The result of this relationship is selective reporting of events.

Operational Framework.Foreign news sections of Philippine newspapers and foreign news segments of television newscasts are shaped by the interests of owners, editorial policies, audience and advertisements. The criteria for selection of foreign news, the news values, also affect the foreign news coverage. These factors result in unequal treatment of stories and paved way for the dominance of some topics and of some regions in foreign news coverage of media.

Based on the foregoing example, how should the conceptual framework formulated? • cite your conceptual framework or paradigm; • Identify your variables; • Point out the dependent and intervening variables; • Show the direction of the study. Once the conceptual framework has been determined, the next for the researcher is to determine what research methods to employ to best answer the research problem through the proposed framework.

Research design depends on the nature of the data to analyzed. Quantitative data – when your thesis problem requires numerical measurements of traits, trends, characteristics or attributes of the subject matter; • Analysis leads researcher to: • depict what is typical and atypical among the data; • show the degree of difference or relationship between two or more variables; • determine the likelihood that the findings are real for the population as opposed to having occurred only by chance in the sample.

Qualitative data – when your thesis problem focuses on the meanings, perceptions, symbols or description of the subject matter. • Analysis leads researcher to: • observe behaviors, situations, interactions and environments; • scrutinize these observations for patterns and categories; • answer research questions based on what can be deduced from the findings.

  • More by User

Theoretical Framework

Theoretical Framework

Theoretical Framework. Research basis. Theoretical Framework. What is the central concept(s) integral to the study? (look within and outside LIS) Connecting the study to theory: basic research. Good Theory.

2.19k views • 29 slides

Theoretical Framework

Theoretical Framework. ESP310 – Human Movement Pedagogy 1. 4 Areas of Concern. Why teach? Growth & Development Theories of Learning Other Theorists. Why Teach?. Your new text will take you through some of the reasons you’re here Other reasons may be relevant for some of you

544 views • 26 slides

Developing the Public Sector Conceptual Framework

Developing the Public Sector Conceptual Framework

Developing the Public Sector Conceptual Framework. David Loweth UK Accounting Standards Board OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium 4 March 2008. Introduction: about the ASB.

453 views • 33 slides

Developing the theoretical framework

Developing the theoretical framework

GIS Development Cycle. Needs AssessmentCreation of an implementation planDevelop a theoretical frameworkSurvey of Available DataSurvey of GIS Hardware and SoftwareDetailed Database Planning and DesignDatabase ConstructionPilot Study/Benchmark TestReview/modify the original planAcquisition of GIS Hardware and SoftwareGIS System IntegrationGIS Application DevelopmentGIS Use and Maintenance .

521 views • 17 slides

The Theoretical Framework

The Theoretical Framework

The Theoretical Framework. Prof. Nawal A. Fouad. (4). March 2007. A theoretical framework is analogous to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relationships among variables of a research study.

597 views • 20 slides

Measurement and the Conceptual Framework

Measurement and the Conceptual Framework

Measurement and the Conceptual Framework. Recent changes at the IASB Geoffrey Whittington. Outline. To explain the importance of the IASB, the Conceptual Framework, and Measurement concepts To explain my critique of the IASB’s ‘fair value view’ of financial reporting ( Abacus, 2008).

449 views • 25 slides

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework

323 views • 9 slides

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

528 views • 27 slides

A Conceptual and Theoretical Framework for Sustainable Development Statistics

A Conceptual and Theoretical Framework for Sustainable Development Statistics

A Conceptual and Theoretical Framework for Sustainable Development Statistics. Thorvald Moe, Ph.D. INTRODUCTION.

307 views • 6 slides

Theoretical framework

Theoretical framework

A GUIDE IN THE RAIN FOREST? – THE ROLE OF A REGIONAL STRATEGIC NETWORK IN AN INNOVATION PROCESS by Jens Eklinder-Frick Gävle University. Theoretical framework.

308 views • 18 slides

Theoretical Framework

Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework represents your beliefs on how certain phenomena (or variables or concepts) are related to each other (a model) and an explanation on why you believe that these variables are associated to each other (a theory). . Theoretical Framework.

2.23k views • 25 slides

Theoretical Framework

Theoretical Framework. And Logical Proof. What is the point?. Theoretical frameworks will help you form strong, articulate arguments Logical proofs will also do this, but give you ideas of how to structure your essay effectively too. BA 7 and 8. Theoretical Framework.

893 views • 30 slides

Theoretical Framework

Theoretical Framework. And Logical Proof. What is the point?. Theoretical frameworks will help you form strong, articulate arguments Logical proofs will also do this, but give you ideas of how to structure your essay effectively too. BA 5 and You. BA5  Due Tues day , 3 /8.

486 views • 33 slides

Theoretical Framework

Teachers‘ Acting Patterns while Teaching with Information- and Communication Technology in the Subjects German, Mathematics and Computer Science. Sigrid Blömeke, Dana Eichler & Christiane Müller.

162 views • 1 slides

Theoretical Framework

Predation on polychaets and crustaceans through ontogeny in a small bentonic shark ( Mustelus schmitti ). Theoretical Framework. Size of sharks depend on sex and ontogenic stage. Body Length ( Lt ) can affect search and manipulation time of preys.

267 views • 13 slides

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework. Theory. Theories are constructed in order to explain, predict and master phenomena (e.g. relationships, events, or the behavior). In many instances we are constructing models of reality.

452 views • 16 slides

The Theoretical Framework

The Theoretical Framework. Islamic University _Nursing college. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relationships among variables of a research study.

243 views • 20 slides

Theoretical and Conceptual Framework

Theoretical and Conceptual Framework

Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. THEORY. Theory is: a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts a systematic abstract explanation of the relationship between the concepts Its composed of concepts and propositions. Conceptual models.

324 views • 15 slides

Measurement and the Conceptual Framework

256 views • 25 slides

THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. SYSTEMS FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE. Organisations should be treated as open systems which transform inputs into outputs

195 views • 11 slides

CONCEPTUAL and THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

CONCEPTUAL and THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

CONCEPTUAL and THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK. What is FRAMEWORK?. A framework is simply the structure of the research idea or concept and how it is put together. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. A conceptual framework elaborates the research problem in relation to relevant literature.

371 views • 11 slides

PowerShow.com - The best place to view and share online presentations

  • Preferences

Free template

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework

Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework j199 lecture, r.e.khan theory theories are constructed in order to explain, predict and master phenomena (e.g ... – powerpoint ppt presentation.

  • It helps the researcher see clearly the variables of the study
  • It can provide him with a general framework for data analysis
  • It is essential in preparing a research proposal using descriptive and experimental methods.
  • Based on the foregoing example, how should the theoretical framework formulated?
  • specifies the theory used as basis for the study
  • mentions the proponents of the theory
  • cites the main points emphasized in the theory
  • Supports his exposition of the theory by ideas from other experts
  • illustrates his theoretical framework by means of a diagram and,
  • reiterates his theoretical proposition in the study.
  • Based on the foregoing example, how should the conceptual framework formulated?
  • cite your conceptual framework or paradigm
  • Identify your variables
  • Point out the dependent and intervening variables
  • Show the direction of the study.
  • Analysis leads researcher to
  • depict what is typical and atypical among the data
  • show the degree of difference or relationship between two or more variables
  • determine the likelihood that the findings are real for the population as opposed to having occurred only by chance in the sample.
  • observe behaviors, situations, interactions and environments
  • scrutinize these observations for patterns and categories
  • answer research questions based on what can be deduced from the findings.

PowerShow.com is a leading presentation sharing website. It has millions of presentations already uploaded and available with 1,000s more being uploaded by its users every day. Whatever your area of interest, here you’ll be able to find and view presentations you’ll love and possibly download. And, best of all, it is completely free and easy to use.

You might even have a presentation you’d like to share with others. If so, just upload it to PowerShow.com. We’ll convert it to an HTML5 slideshow that includes all the media types you’ve already added: audio, video, music, pictures, animations and transition effects. Then you can share it with your target audience as well as PowerShow.com’s millions of monthly visitors. And, again, it’s all free.

About the Developers

PowerShow.com is brought to you by  CrystalGraphics , the award-winning developer and market-leading publisher of rich-media enhancement products for presentations. Our product offerings include millions of PowerPoint templates, diagrams, animated 3D characters and more.

World's Best PowerPoint Templates PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IMAGES

  1. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework PowerPoint Presentation Slides

    theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

  2. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework PowerPoint Template

    theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

  3. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework PowerPoint Template

    theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

  4. PPT

    theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

  5. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework PowerPoint Presentation Slides

    theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

  6. Theoretical Conceptual Framework Ppt Powerpoint Presentation

    theoretical and conceptual framework in research ppt

VIDEO

  1. Literature Review: Theoretical Framework, Conceptual Framework & Research Framework ?

  2. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework

  3. The Role of Theory, Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks in Scholarly Research

  4. 6 HOW TO WRITE A RESEARCH THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

  5. THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WORKSHOP 05102023

  6. Theoretical Framework vs Conceptual Framework

COMMENTS

  1. Chapter 6-THEORETICAL & CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

    18. Theoretical Framework and Conceptual Framework may be represented as models: • A model is a symbolic representation that helps the researcher to express abstract concepts and relationships easily, using minimal words. • A model can be represented schematically or mathematically. • Schematic model - conveys concepts and propositions through the use of boxes, arrows or other symbols.

  2. Theoretical and Conceptual framework in Research

    2. Purpose of Theoretical and Conceptual Framework In general, both 'conceptual' and 'theoretical' frameworks refer to the epistemological paradigm a researcher adopts in looking at a given research problem - as Liehr and Smith (1999: 12) point out, "each of these terms refers to a structure" which guides the researcher.

  3. THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS

    A conceptual framework as product of constructivism is usually designed based on a sound theoretical framework, which lies on a much broader cognitive scale of abstraction. An analytical framework is thus forged from a conceptual framework in order to understand the potential (causal) relationships between concepts in the search for meaning.

  4. Theoretical vs Conceptual Framework (+ Examples)

    The theoretical framework is used to lay down a foundation of theory on which your study will be built, whereas the conceptual framework visualises what you anticipate the relationships between concepts, constructs and variables may be, based on your understanding of the existing literature and the specific context and focus of your research.

  5. What Is a Conceptual Framework?

    Table of contents. Developing a conceptual framework in research. Step 1: Choose your research question. Step 2: Select your independent and dependent variables. Step 3: Visualize your cause-and-effect relationship. Step 4: Identify other influencing variables. Frequently asked questions about conceptual models.

  6. Literature Reviews, Theoretical Frameworks, and Conceptual Frameworks

    Including a conceptual framework in a research study is important, but researchers often opt to include either a conceptual or a theoretical framework. Either may be adequate, but both provide greater insight into the research approach. For instance, a research team plans to test a novel component of an existing theory.

  7. Applying Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks to Health Professions

    The framework should resonate with the researcher and the conceptual heritage of the project 16 and be used in every part of the research process from development of the research question and methodology to analysis of the results and discussion of study findings. 12,13 Researchers often lose sight of this guiding principle once the theory or ...

  8. Theories and Frameworks: Introduction

    A theoretical framework is a single formal theory. When a study is designed around a theoretical framework, the theory is the primary means in which the research problem is understood and investigated. Although theoretical frameworks tend to be used in quantitative studies, you will also see this approach in qualitative research.

  9. PDF Linda M. Crawford A

    Maxwell presented the terms as synonymous because he viewed the conceptual framework as presenting a theory of the phenomenon under investigation (p. 39). A major point of Maxwell's contribution is that the researcher must build, or con-struct, the conceptual framework from personal experience, prior research, and pub -

  10. What is a Theoretical Framework? How to Write It (with Examples)

    A theoretical framework guides the research process like a roadmap for the study, so you need to get this right. Theoretical framework 1,2 is the structure that supports and describes a theory. A theory is a set of interrelated concepts and definitions that present a systematic view of phenomena by describing the relationship among the variables for explaining these phenomena.

  11. (PPT) Theoretical Framework

    In this chapter, we consider two research frameworks: conceptual and theoretical. The chapter complements and questions the existing conversations around the theoretical and conceptual perspectives that inform the research process. Thus, the intent in the chapter is both edifying and therapeutic.

  12. Formulating Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: A Guide to ...

    Topic 6 Theoretical and conceptual framwork formulation.ppt - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. The document discusses theoretical and conceptual frameworks. It explains that a theoretical framework presents the theory which explains why the problem under study exists, and serves as a basis for conducting ...

  13. (Pdf) Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks in Research: Conceptual

    Abstract. It has been discovered over the years that most students lack a proper understanding of both theoretical framework (TF) and conceptual framework (CF) and the distinctions between the two ...

  14. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework: Mandatory Ingredients of A

    The theoretical and conceptual framework explains the path of a research and grounds it firmly in theoretical constructs (Adom, Hussein and Agyem, 2018 as cited in Mensah et al, 2020). A theory ...

  15. PPT

    Presentation Transcript. THEORY • Theory is: • a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts • a systematic abstract explanation of the relationship between the concepts • Its composed of concepts and propositions. Conceptual models • Conceptual framework, conceptual model, conceptual schemes Are all ...

  16. PPT

    The theoretical framework strengthens the study in the following ways: • An explicit statement of theoretical assumptions permits the reader to evaluate them critically. • The theoretical framework connects the researcher to existing knowledge. Guided by a relevant theory, you are given a basis for your hypotheses and choice of research ...

  17. (PDF) Theoretical And Conceptual Framework: A Critical Part of

    A research without the theoretical or conceptual framework makes it difficult for readers in ascertaining the academic position and the underlying factors to the researcher's assertions and/or ...

  18. Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework

    5. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK • Derived from concepts • If research problem cannot meaningfully be researched in reference to only one theory or concepts resident within one theory • The researcher synthesise the existing views in the literature concerning a given situation- both theoretical and empirical findings • The synthesis is called conceptual framework- representing an integrated ...

  19. PPT

    While the theoretical framework is the theory on which the study is based, the conceptual framework is the operationalization of the theory. Conceptual framework It is the researcher's own position on the problem and gives direction to the study. It may be an adaptation of a model used in a previous study, with modifications to suit the inquiry.

  20. PPT

    Formulating the Theoretical Framework The theoretical framework of the study is a structure that can hold or support a theory of a research work. It presents the theory which explains why the problem under study exists. Thus, the theoretical framework is but a theory that serves as a basis for conducting research. 4 Formulating the Theoretical ...

  21. Thomas Rowntree on Instagram: "I hope you read this 1. Build on

    Build on research ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Undergoing resear..." Thomas Rowntree on Instagram: "I hope you read this 👇🏼 1. Build on research ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Undergoing research and precedent analysis throughout your project development is crucial.