critical thinking and structured analysis course

Official website of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Education & Training
• NICCS Education & Training Catalog
• CyberWerx Academy

Critical Thinking and Structured Analysis (CTSA) Course

• Online, Instructor-Led

Timely and accurate decision making are the traits of every great manager and analyst. However, cognitive biases, perceptual biases, contradictory data, large volumes of data, and incomplete information can result in poor business and operational decisions that can cost money, time, reputation, and in some cases, even lives. The Critical Thinking and Structured Analysis (CTSA) course is designed to help students improve their ability to analyze information and make difficult business and operational decisions.  The course is perfect for all occupations, managers, and analysts who want to sharpen their decision-making skills.

Learning Objectives

To provide business managers, program managers, cybersecurity managers, analysts, and decision-makers at all levels with analytical processes and critical thinking skills needed to make accurate and time sensitive decisions.

Framework Connections

• Protect and Defend
• Securely Provision

Programs by Topic  

• Corporate Governance
• Design Thinking
• Entrepreneurship
• General Management
• Negotiation
• Organizational Leadership
• Personal Leadership
• Social Impact
• Technology & Operations

Featured Programs  

• Stanford Executive Program
• Stanford LEAD
• See All Programs by Date
• See All Online Programs
• Custom Programs
• Program Formats
• Developing a Program
• Catalyst Programs
• Diversity & Inclusion for Strategic Impact
• Strategic Transformation in Times of Disruption
• Program Experience
• Contact Client Services
• Academic Experience

Life & Learning  

• In-Person Programs
• On-Demand Online Courses
• Live Online Programs

Community  

• Faculty Spotlights
• Participant Spotlights
• Alumni Voices
• Eligibility
• Payment & Cancellation
• Application Process
• International Participants
• Apply Online

Stanford LEAD Online Business Program

Choose a session:, 11 sep 2024 – 10 sep 2025, critical analytical thinking.

Critical Analytical Thinking is essentially the language of strategy. It adds structure and transparency to the analysis and formulation of strategy and helps executives make decisions in a collaborative, logical, and fact-driven fashion.

Course Introduction

This course will help you develop and hone skills necessary to analyze complex problems, formulate well-reasoned arguments, and consider alternative points of view. It will help you assess innovative business models, identify critical issues, develop and present well-reasoned positions, and evaluate evidence. You will apply those skills to address a variety of management problems in both this and subsequent courses in the LEAD Certificate program.

• Foundations of logical reasoning
• Using and interpreting evidence
• Designing experiments
• Using analogies

We will use a combination of lectures and case studies to prepare you to present written and video arguments for your positions, and to critique and debate those of your peers.

Course Faculty

Haim mendelson.

Program dates, fees, and faculty subject to change. Consistent with its non-discrimination policy, Stanford’s programs are open to participants regardless of race, color, national or ethnic origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, veteran status, marital status or any other characteristic protected by applicable law.

• Priorities for the GSB's Future
• See the Current DEI Report
• Supporting Data
• Research & Insights
• Share Your Thoughts
• Search Fund Primer
• Teaching & Curriculum
• Affiliated Faculty
• Faculty Advisors
• Louis W. Foster Resource Center
• Defining Social Innovation
• Impact Compass
• Global Health Innovation Insights
• Faculty Affiliates
• Student Awards & Certificates
• Changemakers
• Dean Jonathan Levin
• Dean Garth Saloner
• Dean Robert Joss
• Dean Michael Spence
• Dean Robert Jaedicke
• Dean Rene McPherson
• Dean Arjay Miller
• Dean Ernest Arbuckle
• Dean Jacob Hugh Jackson
• Dean Willard Hotchkiss
• Faculty in Memoriam
• Stanford GSB Firsts
• Certificate & Award Recipients
• Teaching Approach
• Analysis and Measurement of Impact
• The Corporate Entrepreneur: Startup in a Grown-Up Enterprise
• Data-Driven Impact
• Designing Experiments for Impact
• Digital Business Transformation
• The Founder’s Right Hand
• Marketing for Measurable Change
• Product Management
• Public Policy Lab: Financial Challenges Facing US Cities
• Public Policy Lab: Homelessness in California
• Lab Features
• Curricular Integration
• View From The Top
• Formation of New Ventures
• Managing Growing Enterprises
• Startup Garage
• Explore Beyond the Classroom
• Stanford Venture Studio
• Summer Program
• Workshops & Events
• The Five Lenses of Entrepreneurship
• Leadership Labs
• Executive Challenge
• Arbuckle Leadership Fellows Program
• Selection Process
• Training Schedule
• Time Commitment
• Learning Expectations
• Post-Training Opportunities
• Who Should Apply
• Introductory T-Groups
• Leadership for Society Program
• Certificate
• 2023 Awardees
• 2022 Awardees
• 2021 Awardees
• 2020 Awardees
• 2019 Awardees
• 2018 Awardees
• Social Management Immersion Fund
• Stanford Impact Founder Fellowships and Prizes
• Stanford Impact Leader Prizes
• Social Entrepreneurship
• Stanford GSB Impact Fund
• Economic Development
• Energy & Environment
• Communication
• Collaborative Environment
• Activities & Organizations
• Student Services
• Stanford GSB Residences
• International Students
• Environmental Leadership
• Stanford GSB Artwork
• A Closer Look
• California & the Bay Area
• Voices of Stanford GSB
• Business & Beneficial Technology
• Business & Sustainability
• Business & Free Markets
• Business, Government, and Society Forum
• Get Involved
• Why Stanford MBA
• Second Year
• Global Experiences
• JD/MBA Joint Degree
• MA Education/MBA Joint Degree
• MD/MBA Dual Degree
• MPP/MBA Joint Degree
• MS Computer Science/MBA Joint Degree
• MS Electrical Engineering/MBA Joint Degree
• MS Environment and Resources (E-IPER)/MBA Joint Degree
• Academic Calendar
• Clubs & Activities
• Conferences
• LGBTQ+ Students
• Military Veterans
• Minorities & People of Color
• Partners & Families
• Students with Disabilities
• Student Support
• Residential Life
• Student Voices
• MBA Alumni Voices
• A Week in the Life
• Career Support
• Employment Outcomes
• Cost of Attendance
• Knight-Hennessy Scholars Program
• Yellow Ribbon Program
• BOLD Fellows Fund
• Loan Forgiveness
• Contact the Financial Aid Office
• Evaluation Criteria
• GMAT & GRE
• English Language Proficiency
• Personal Information, Activities & Awards
• Professional Experience
• Letters of Recommendation
• Optional Short Answer Questions
• Application Fee
• Reapplication
• Deferred Enrollment
• Joint & Dual Degrees
• Entering Class Profile
• Event Schedule
• Ambassadors
• New & Noteworthy
• Ask a Question
• See Why Stanford MSx
• Is MSx Right for You?
• MSx Stories
• Leadership Development
• Career Advancement
• Career Change
• How You Will Learn
• Admission Events
• Personal Information
• Information for Recommenders
• GMAT, GRE & EA
• English Proficiency Tests
• After You’re Admitted
• Daycare, Schools & Camps
• U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents
• Requirements
• Requirements: Behavioral
• Requirements: Quantitative
• Requirements: Macro
• Requirements: Micro
• Annual Evaluations
• Field Examination
• Research Activities
• Research Papers
• Dissertation
• Oral Examination
• Current Students
• Research Resources
• Education & CV
• International Applicants
• Statement of Purpose
• Reapplicants
• Application Fee Waiver
• Deadline & Decisions
• Financial Aid
• Job Market Candidates
• Academic Placements
• Stay in Touch
• Faculty Mentors
• Current Fellows
• Standard Track
• Fellowship & Benefits
• Group Enrollment
• Diversity & Inclusion
• Strategic Transformation
• Campus Experience
• Live Online Experience
• Silicon Valley & Bay Area
• Digital Credentials
• Stanford Ignite
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Operations, Information & Technology
• Organizational Behavior
• Political Economy
• Awards & Honors
• Classical Liberalism
• The Eddie Lunch
• Accounting Summer Camp
• Videos, Code & Data
• California Econometrics Conference
• California Quantitative Marketing PhD Conference
• California School Conference
• China India Insights Conference
• Homo economicus, Evolving
• Political Economics (2023–24)
• Scaling Geologic Storage of CO2 (2023–24)
• A Resilient Pacific: Building Connections, Envisioning Solutions
• Adaptation and Innovation
• Changing Climate
• Civil Society
• Climate Impact Summit
• Climate Science
• Corporate Carbon Disclosures
• Earth’s Seafloor
• Environmental Justice
• Operations and Information Technology
• Organizations
• Sustainability Reporting and Control
• Taking the Pulse of the Planet
• Urban Infrastructure
• Watershed Restoration
• Junior Faculty Workshop on Financial Regulation and Banking
• Ken Singleton Celebration
• Marketing Camp
• Quantitative Marketing PhD Alumni Conference
• Presentations
• Theory and Inference in Accounting Research
• Publications
• Working Papers
• Case Studies
• Cities, Housing & Society Lab
• Stanford Closer Look Series
• Quick Guides
• Core Concepts
• Journal Articles
• Glossary of Terms
• Executive Education
• Faculty & Staff
• Corporations and Society Initiative
• Researchers & Students
• Research Approach
• Charitable Giving
• Financial Health
• Government Services
• Workers & Careers
• Short Course
• Adaptive & Iterative Experimentation
• Incentive Design
• Social Sciences & Behavioral Nudges
• Bandit Experiment Application
• Conferences & Events
• Reading Materials
• Energy Entrepreneurship
• Faculty & Affiliates
• SOLE Report
• Responsible Supply Chains
• Current Study Usage
• Pre-Registration Information
• Participate in a Study
• Data, Analytics & Research Computing
• Founding Donors
• Location Information
• Participant Profile
• Network Membership
• Program Impact
• Collaborators
• Entrepreneur Profiles
• Company Spotlights
• Seed Transformation Network
• Responsibilities
• Current Coaches
• How to Apply
• Meet the Consultants
• Meet the Interns
• Intern Profiles
• Collaborate
• Research Library
• News & Insights
• Program Contacts
• Databases & Datasets
• Research Guides
• Consultations
• Research Workshops
• Career Research
• Research Data Services
• Course Reserves
• Course Research Guides
• Material Loan Periods
• Fines & Other Charges
• Document Delivery
• Interlibrary Loan
• Equipment Checkout
• Print & Scan
• MBA & MSx Students
• PhD Students
• Other Stanford Students
• Faculty Assistants
• Research Assistants
• Stanford GSB Alumni
• Telling Our Story
• Staff Directory
• Site Registration
• Alumni Directory
• Alumni Email
• Privacy Settings & My Profile
• Digital Communities & Tools
• Success Stories
• The Story of Circles
• Support Women’s Circles
• Stanford Women on Boards Initiative
• Alumnae Spotlights
• Insights & Research
• Regional Chapters
• Identity Chapters
• Industry & Professional
• Entrepreneurial Commitment Group
• Recent Alumni
• Class Notes
• Half-Century Club
• Fall Reunions
• Spring Reunions
• MBA 25th Reunion
• Half-Century Club Reunion
• Faculty Lectures
• Ernest C. Arbuckle Award
• Alison Elliott Exceptional Achievement Award
• ENCORE Award
• Excellence in Leadership Award
• John W. Gardner Volunteer Leadership Award
• Robert K. Jaedicke Faculty Award
• Jack McDonald Military Service Appreciation Award
• Jerry I. Porras Latino Leadership Award
• Tapestry Award
• Student & Alumni Events
• Executive Recruiters
• Interviewing
• Land the Perfect Job with LinkedIn
• Negotiating
• Elevator Pitch
• Email Best Practices
• Resumes & Cover Letters
• Self-Assessment
• Whitney Birdwell Ball
• Margaret Brooks
• Bryn Panee Burkhart
• Margaret Chan
• Ricki Frankel
• Peter Gandolfo
• Cindy W. Greig
• Natalie Guillen
• Carly Janson
• Sloan Klein
• Sherri Appel Lassila
• Stuart Meyer
• Tanisha Parrish
• Virginia Roberson
• Philippe Taieb
• Michael Takagawa
• Terra Winston
• Johanna Wise
• Debbie Wolter
• Rebecca Zucker
• Complimentary Coaching
• Changing Careers
• Work-Life Integration
• Career Breaks
• Flexible Work
• Encore Careers
• Career Video Library
• D&B Hoovers
• Data Axle (ReferenceUSA)
• EBSCO Business Source
• Global Newsstream
• Market Share Reporter
• ProQuest One Business
• Student Clubs
• Entrepreneurial Students
• Stanford GSB Trust
• Alumni Community
• How to Volunteer
• Springboard Sessions
• Consulting Projects
• 2020 – 2029
• 2010 – 2019
• 2000 – 2009
• 1990 – 1999
• 1980 – 1989
• 1970 – 1979
• 1960 – 1969
• 1950 – 1959
• 1940 – 1949
• Service Areas
• ACT History
• ACT Awards Celebration
• ACT Governance Structure
• Building Leadership for ACT
• Individual Leadership Positions
• Leadership Role Overview
• Purpose of the ACT Management Board
• Contact ACT
• Business & Nonprofit Communities
• Reunion Volunteers
• Ways to Give
• Fiscal Year Report
• Business School Fund Leadership Council
• Planned Giving Options
• Planned Giving Benefits
• Planned Gifts and Reunions
• Legacy Partners
• Giving News & Stories
• Giving Deadlines
• Development Staff
• Submit Class Notes
• Class Secretaries
• Board of Directors
• Career & Success
• Culture & Society
• Finance & Investing
• Health Care
• Leadership & Management
• Operations & Logistics
• Opinion & Analysis
• Opportunity & Access
• Sustainability
• Class Takeaways
• All Else Equal: Making Better Decisions
• If/Then: Business, Leadership, Society
• Grit & Growth
• Think Fast, Talk Smart
• Spring 2022
• Spring 2021
• Autumn 2020
• Summer 2020
• Winter 2020
• In the Media
• For Journalists
• DCI Fellows
• Other Auditors
• Academic Calendar & Deadlines
• Course Materials
• Entrepreneurial Resources
• Campus Drive Grove
• Campus Drive Lawn
• CEMEX Auditorium
• King Community Court
• Seawell Family Boardroom
• Stanford GSB Bowl
• Stanford Investors Common
• Town Square
• Vidalakis Courtyard
• Vidalakis Dining Hall
• Catering Services
• Policies & Guidelines
• Reservations
• Contact Faculty Recruiting
• Lecturer Positions
• Postdoctoral Positions
• Accommodations
• CMC-Managed Interviews
• Recruiter-Managed Interviews
• Virtual Interviews
• Campus & Virtual
• Search for Candidates
• Think Globally
• Recruiting Calendar
• Recruiting Policies
• Full-Time Employment
• Summer Employment
• Entrepreneurial Summer Program
• Global Management Immersion Experience
• Social-Purpose Summer Internships
• Process Overview
• Project Types
• Client Eligibility Criteria
• Client Screening
• ACT Leadership
• Social Innovation & Nonprofit Management Resources
• Develop Your Organization’s Talent
• Centers & Initiatives
• Student Fellowships

Critical Thinking and Writing for Intelligence Analysts

Started Feb 3, 2020

$11,000 Enroll

Full program description

A combination of both our Critical Thinking and Structural Analysis and Writing for Intelligence Analysts courses, this program will hone analysts ability to analyze intelligence data and write comprehensive intelligence reports from the tactical to the strategic levels. The in-residence courses will be held in Austin, Texas, home of UPTNext, AFWERx, and Army Futures Command. Discounted hotel rates available.

Analysts must have the requisite skills to synthesize disparate information from multiple sources.  This course is designed to further develop critical thinking, structured analysis, and data synthesis skills in intelligence and intelligence support to cyber operations .  This course provides methodologies and techniques to improve the quality of reasoning, analysis, objectivity, and decision-making.  The course covers critical thinking models, how to address evidence, competing hypotheses, decision trees, weighted analysis, etc.  The course contains embedded and Capstone practical exercises to address cognitive biases and improve critical thinking skills.

Analysts must also be able to clearly and concisely communicate synthesized intelligence from multiple sources.  Effective writers think clearly, draw conclusions, remain objective, employ critical thinking and reasoning, and translate highly complex information into digestible and understandable products.  This course, based on the Intelligence Community Analytic Standards, provides students the opportunity to hone their writing skills in order to present highly effective intelligence products to consumers from tactical to strategic levels.  This course employs a prerequisite writing diagnostic exercise along with practical writing exercises to evaluate, and improve, the student’s ability to clearly, concisely, and accurately present intelligence.

N2-03 Intelligence Analyst Course - Critical Thinking and Structured Analysis (CT&SA)

Graduates of this course are prepared to apply critical thinking and Structural analysis as a NATO Intelligence analyst, in order to provide more accurate, collaborative intelligence that can be validated by other analysts.

• Apply Critical Thinking And Structured Analytical Techniques
• Assess Individual Thinking Skills By Mitigating Biases
• Develop Confidence In Analysis And Conclusions
• Implement Critical Thinking Skills
• Introduce Intelligence Analysis In Nato

Earning Criteria

• Graduates of the N2-03 Intelligence Analyst Course - Critical Thinking and Structured Analysis (CT&SA) Course have completed over 40 hours of interactive plenary lectures, brief, moderated Q&A sessions alternating with facilitated work in small syndicates, followed by back briefs to plenary, and personal case studies to complete the student’s knowledge.

• Geopolitics
• Non State Actors
• Organised crime
• Intelligence School

Combined Air Operations Centers (CAOC): The Key to NATO’s Air Warfare

“trump-proofing” nato: how europe is preparing for change in the white house, ansar allah (houthi): understanding the yemeni fighters, cross border incursions into belgorod oblast: a 6-month outlook, who’s keeping count how militaries estimate death tolls, tajikistan insecurity: between russia and geopolitical tensions, a guide to structured analytic techniques (sats) for intelligence.

By Stevie Cook & Marcel Plichta

One of the key skills in analytic tradecraft is understanding the purpose and usefulness of structured analytic techniques (SATs). Even if you don’t need to use SATs daily  as an intelligence analyst , familiarity with these techniques will help you make sense of incomplete or contradictory information, generate hypotheses, and manage uncertainty. This guide will go through why structured analytic techniques are important for intelligence analysts, how to select SATs that are useful for you, and some resources on SATs, many of which are free.

With an ever-increasing demand for actionable intelligence in a congested information environment, arming yourself with sound analytical tradecraft techniques enables you to discern opportunity from threat, and provides significant value to your customers. Successfully applying Structured Analytical Techniques (SATs) not only develops your analytical ability but increases your credibility as an analyst within the intelligence community, essential when getting your foot on the ladder in pursuit of a career in intelligence.

1.0. What are Structured Analytic Techniques?

Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis defines an SAT as “a mechanism by which internal thought processes are externalised in a systematic and transparent manner so that they can be shared, built on, and easily critiqued by others.” ( source ). Essentially, SATs are a range of analytical techniques intended to improve intelligence analysis by addressing two sources of human error:

•  Systematic biases
•  Random noise

Throughout this guide, you will note there are multiple SATs which can be used to accomplish effective intelligence analysis. For example, you could use “Brainstorming” to elicit relevant information when starting a project. Followed by a “Cross-Impact Matrix” to develop an understanding of each variable and how this may have a relationship with other variables. This can then be bolstered by using a “Key Assumptions Check” to identify the working assumptions underlying your work. This can also be offset by using “What If?” Analysis, which allows you to recognise the possibility of future consequences and enables the decision-maker to contingency plan. 

While these are well-known SATs, there are many more to familiarize yourself with. The rest of this guide will cover why analysts benefit from using SATs, and how they can go about it.

2.0. Why Are Structured Analytic Techniques Important?

The human brain has evolved to deal with uncertainty quickly, a process often expedited by unconscious assumptions, perceptions and beliefs. One of the most well-known examples is confirmation bias; when your preconceptions about an issue get in the way of interpreting new information. Biases are annoying in daily life, but in an intelligence setting they can lead to flawed products and even intelligence failure . SATs are not the only way of dealing with cognitive bias, but they are developed specifically for analysts to deal with them in their daily work. Using SATs, you can catch issues and reflect on your analysis well before you start drafting the product. It’s also easier to get feedback from peers or supervisors.

Early intelligence agencies ignored how these factors might affect analysis. Analysts initially learned key lessons through experience, and often after making mistakes. “It is simply assumed, incorrectly, that analysts know how to analyse,” wrote CIA veteran Richards J. Heuer in his 1999 book the Psychology of Intelligence Analysis ( source ). As Heuer and others started looking at ways to improve analysis, they developed Structured Analytic Techniques to formalise their findings.

Standardisation of the process

Essentially, SATs are designed to identify and challenge these assumptions by exploring alternative interpretations whilst structuring information coherently. In turn, this enables us to review our analytical process and identify any errors, promotes thorough and comprehensive analysis, mitigating against potential analytical shortfalls ( source ). This can massively bolster our ability to present a comprehensive and insightful intelligence picture to key decision-makers and major stakeholders. This also promotes analytical transparency to prospective consumers. ( source ).

If you manage analysts, understanding SATs and successful implementation of SATs into your workflow helps you get the best out of your team. SATs can save analysts time by streamlining analytical focus and mitigating against going down “rabbit holes”, co-ordinating collection and reducing time for editing whilst enabling you to produce a higher quality and impactful intelligence analysis. Adapting relevant SATs into templates will help standardise the process across products and improve the quality of products themselves. 

3.0. Knowing What Structured Analytic Technique to Use

The sheer number of techniques can be daunting for analysts. There are dozens of SATs. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis, for instance, lists 66 “core” techniques, from “several hundred that might have been included.” Don’t fret. Using Heuer and Pherson’s SAT selection process as a handrail, the table below provides a examples on how you can apply a few SATs to tackle any problem-set ( source );

Here’s a practical example of how and when an Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) can be used;

Steps ( source ):

• Identify the possible hypotheses to  consider. If possible, use a group of analysts with different perspectives to brainstorm possibilities.
• Make a list of significant evidence and arguments for and against each hypothesis.
•  Prepare a matrix with hypotheses (H) across the top and evidence (E) down the side. Analyse the “Diagnosticity” of the evidence and arguments— that is, identify which items are most helpful in judging the relative likelihood of the hypotheses ( + = Likely, – = Not Likely, – – = Unknown / Cannot Be Determined).
• Refine the matrix. Reconsider the hypotheses and delete evidence and arguments that have no diagnostic value.
• Draw tentative conclusions about the relative likelihood of each hypothesis. Proceed by trying to disprove the hypotheses rather than prove them.
• Analyse how sensitive your conclusion is to a few critical items of evidence. Consider the consequences for your analysis if that evidence were wrong, misleading, or subject to a different interpretation.
• Report conclusions. Discuss the relative likelihood of all the hypotheses, not just the most likely one.
• Identify milestones for future observation that may indicate events are taking a different course than expected.

4.0. Tips for Using Structured Analytic Techniques

• What’s the requirement? Whilst it’s easy to become overly-engaged in collating data and evidence for the problem-set, it’s critical to understand the overarching context of the issue. Ensure you allow for regular intervals to ask yourself; what is required of you and how are you going to frame the issue. This will streamline the application of the SAT.
• Who is the consumer / target audience? From the outset of the tasking, establish who the target audience is, what format the consumer wants to receive the final product, and on what timeline. A larger, thematic product will likely require more time and a specific SAT in order to unpick multiple and complex factors contributing to the overarching issue. You’re aiming for your product to be a timely, impactful and aesthetically appropriate vehicle for your intelligence analysis, tailored to the consumers requirements.
• How does this event affect us? How does it affect our future?                                              
• Why is it important?  What critical questions does this information cause us to ask?
• What conclusions can we draw from this experience? Using the AIMS framework is a terrific way to address the above and to conceptualise the structure of your product:
• A udience: Who is your primary audience ?
• I ssue: What key issues are those consumers struggling with now or will be dealing with in the near future?
• M essage: What is the bottom-line message you want to convey?
• S toryline: With the bottom-line message in mind, how can you best present the storyline (or “overall package”)?
• Collaboration with new, alternative and existing subject matter experts (SMEs) and / or internal and external teams allows us to not only recognise and challenge our cognitive biases, but also provide new insights into the problem which you hadn’t previously considered. Others may help you identify a new intelligence gap or present questions the consumer may pose in the future. Collaborating on SATs can also be promoted by senior analysts and intelligence managers; facilitate the use of SATs in the workplace, show your analysts examples. A fun way to do this is to apply SATs to historical events or even popular films or TV shows. If analysts disagree with which SAT you’ve used or the subsequent findings, it means you’ve got them engaging with SATs.
• Using social media platforms such as LinkedIn and Twitter allows you to network with others; exposing yourself to alternative thought processes and facilitating analytical debate. Create your own analytical team, host analytical technique sessions with those you’ve networked with to work on a problem-set.
• When collaborating with others, it’s important not to inadvertently create Information Bubbles, Confirmation Bias, Echo Chambers and Group Think. SATs go a long way in tackling cognitive biases, but ensuring you’re aware of alternative narratives via other analysts will add another filter against such biases ( source , source ).
• Invest in SATs: Remember that SATs are tools meant to get you thinking. You only get out of them what you put into them. If you are just going through the motions of an SAT to make your supervisor happy, then they won’t really help you produce good analysis.

5.0. Common Mistakes When Using Structured Analytic Techniques

• Undefined question: By not defining the question, you’ll be unable to collect the relevant evidence, select the appropriate SAT and ultimately not meet the consumers requirement. Questions are by far the most important tool available to decision-makers and analysts to achieve good intelligence results. With the right questions, decision-makers can precisely determine their knowledge interest and analysts can arrive at helpful answers with the right questions. If elements of a question are not sufficiently defined, then that expands the potential question space and makes it challenging to collect the most relevant evidence. Properly managing stakeholder requirements is mandatory for intelligence teams to be effective in their roles. Requirements provide clarity, direction, and stakeholder alignment, enabling intelligence teams to produce information that is timely, relevant, and useful. ( source , source , source ). Refer back to AIMS to guide you.
• Inappropriate SAT selection: With so many SATs available to you, it can be easy to default to using the same techniques. However, as an intelligence analyst, you should not become too comfortable with any selection of techniques. Instead, continuously push your cognitive process boundaries by incorporating other SATs ( source ). You can also use SATs to explore new analytical ideas or hidden problem-sets. This can be an effective way to drive the analytical process and direct the intelligence collection.
• Analysis vs Collection-Driven Intelligence: Evidence can drive SAT selection, rather than the analytical need driving the evidence collection. This shortfall can mean the analyst does not have a rounded intelligence picture due to prioritising the SAT over the intelligence. 
• Infallible SATs: Another mistake is assuming that an SAT automatically makes your product better or more legitimate. Only use a SAT if you’re confident that it’s adding real value. Otherwise, you’re just wasting you and your customer’s time. Don’t assume that correctly applying an SAT will automatically make your product “the truth.” Analysts deal with uncertainty and conflicting information, and while SATs help you manage it, they don’t make you omniscient. You can do everything right and still be wrong for reasons out of your control.

6.0. Resources on Critical Thinking and Structured Analytical Thinking

6.1. books about analysis and critical thinking:.

• The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis by Richards J. Heuer Jr. (available for free here ) 
• US Army Intelligence Analysis Guide ATP 2-33.4, especially Chapter 4. (available for free here ) 
• Rebel Ideas by Matthew Syed ( link )
• Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Khaneman ( link ) 
• How Intelligence Analysts Can Improve Critical Thinking and Writing Skills by Edge Staff (available here )

6.3. Reference Materials for Different Kinds of SATs:

• Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis by Randolph H. Pherson and Richards J. Heuer Jr. ( link )
• A Tradecraft Primer: Structured Analytic Techniques for Improving Intelligence Analysis (available for free here )
• A Tradecraft Primer: Basic Structured Analytic Techniques (available for free here )

7.0. Frequently Asked Questions about SATs

7.1 can professions other than intelligence analysis use structured analytic techniques.

Yes, because SATs are a way to structure your thinking; journalists, academics, investigators, or anyone else dealing with lots of information and uncertainty can use SATs. There’s often overlap between SATs and investigative techniques used in everything from business analysis to healthcare. Resources like the ones linked above therefore make assumptions about who is doing the analysis, why, and for whom. As a result, you may have to adapt methods for your specific workplace. Here’s an example of an ACH being applied in a financial crime scenario”

7.2. Are SATs useful for GSOCs, current intelligence, watch floors, and other fast-paced environments?

Many SATs are meant for longer-term products that can go into more detail, but others can be quite useful. For instance, your team could develop indicators that you update as new reporting comes in. Additionally, fast-paced environments are more prone to cognitive biases, so trying to implement shortened versions of SATs like Red Teaming is useful, even if you do it informally.

7.3. Which SATs are Useful For Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) and Social Media?

Social media and other open-source material is often contradictory, incomplete, and sometimes deceptive. Such a contested information environment can make things even harder for analysts who don’t have the same tools as large corporate companies or government agencies. Analysts working with open-source material should pay particular attention to SATs that challenge assumptions and help deal with uncertainty. When dealing with OSINT, analysts should use variants of ACH where possible, and constantly do Key Assumptions and Quality of Information checks (listed in the free resources above) to separate the reporting itself from the analyst’s interpretation of it. OSINT analysts could also benefit from data visualization and aggregation SATs if they work with lots of data. 

8.0. Case Studies in Using Structured Analytic Techniques

• Multi-layered approach: You may find that each SAT may only provide one piece of the puzzle, and therefore, may require different SATs for various stages of the analytical process. Earlier, we established how “Brainstorming” can be supplemented with “Cross Impact Matrix”, and later bolstered with a “Key Assumptions Check” and “What If? Analysis”. Using a multi-layered approach not only provides you with more opportunities to identify other variables contributing to the problem-set, but mitigate against potential analytical shortfalls.
• Nothing ventured, nothing gained: If you’re an aspiring intelligence analyst, or maybe want to flex your analytical muscles, try applying some SATs to historical events and see what conclusions / forecasting you’re able to discern. You can use events such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, Suez Canal Crisis, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Use Framing Techniques ahead of the 2024 US Presidential Race ( source ). Utilise your OSINT toolkit to collect evidence to dissect and forecast a current affair. You can use Beebe & Pherson’s “Cases in Intelligence Analysis: Structured Analytic Techniques in Action” as a primer ( source ).

8.1. Case 1: 9/11 and the formation of the CIA’s Red Cell

The 9/11 terrorist attacks are a pertinent example of how assumptions, perceptions and cognitive homogeneity hindered intelligence picture with catastrophic consequences. In the lead up to 9/11, CIA and FBI intelligence analysts were predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant American males therefore unconsciously blinkered from identifying threat streams presented by al Qaeda; generally Middle-Eastern, Islamic males ( source ). This was further identified following the 9/11 Commission Report and the Intelligence Reform Act 2004 ( source , source ). 9/11 highlighted multiple intelligence failures by the U.S. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies and reinforced the significance of applying SATs to mitigate against such failures in the future.

Following 9/11, the CIA formed the “Red Cell,” which utilised SATs, such as “Red Teaming” to produce alternative intelligence analysis ( source ). To further the effectiveness of the intelligence analysis, the team was formed of a mixture of junior and senior analysts, and did not include any terrorism experts and only one Middle East Subject Matter Expert (SME). This collaborative cognitive diversity will have greatly enhanced the application of SATs and mitigate against threat-to-life implications. This team was formed to challenge traditional intelligence SMEs and policy-makers’ cognitive biases.

As such, many of the declassified Red Cell analyses were created in the build-up to the 2003 US invasion in Iraq. The Red Cell attempted to establish potential actions Iraq President, Saddam Hossein, might take against US forces. A declassified Red Team memo from 2002 explored how Saddam Hussein’s personality might influence his reaction to US activity in Iraq ( source ). Another memo from 2003 titled “If Saddam Should Accept Exile…”. Both are examples of “What If? Analysis” being applied in a major international operation, and proved effective in challenging historical interpretations of Saddam’s likely Course of Action (CoA) ( source ).

8.2. Case 2: Grey Dynamics’ Key Assumptions Check

One of the more prominent ways Grey Dynamics uses SATs is within its products. You’ll notice the consistent inclusion of Analytical Summaries with a Key Assumptions check. For instance, one of our earlier products on Mozambique, found here . The analytical summary is an opportunity for analysts to discuss their approach and the quality of information about a topic for instance:

“We are confident that political violence in Cabo Delgado will remain consistent over the next six months. Our analysis is mainly based on French and English language media outlets, Think tanks and quantitative analysis from ACLED data. We assume that Maputo will continue to prefer gaining from international extractive contracts without implementing developmental projects. Were this assumption proven incorrect, we would expect a progressive decrease in political violence and, in the long term, the consolidation of a durable peace.”

Integrating the analytical summary into our products is useful for the analyst and the consumer. The analyst in this case is reflecting on the source of information, identifying one of the major assumptions and thinking through the implications if it were wrong. Consumers gain an insight into the analyst’s thought process and a sense of what could happen if some of the assumptions are incorrect, in turn, increasing analytical transparency and credibility.

You can explore more case studies applying SATs here .

9.0. Summing Up

Curiosity is perhaps the foundational attribute of intelligence analysis ( source ). Harness this curiosity effectively with SATs by;

• Flexing your analytical muscles
• Familiarising yourself with your own cognitive biases and critically evaluating your sources.
• Collaborating with other members; this will open your eyes to new perceptions and  help you to tap into new audiences or re-engage with existing ones ( source ).

When used properly, SATs are an invaluable tool in your analytical toolkit. Not only can SATs enhance intelligence and threat analysis, but they can also be applied in a journalistic and academic capacity and can supplement financial and business analysis. Using SATs are an effective way to address cognitive biases, collaborate with cognitively diverse analysts, increase the effectiveness of analytical output, mitigate against risk, and exponentially improve credibility as an analyst in the intelligence community and with key stakeholders.

• Intelligence
• Intelligence Analysis

Table of contents

Get the weekly email from Grey Dynamics that makes reading intel articles and reports actually enjoyable. Join our mailing list to stay in the loop for free!

Related contents

Grey Dynamics is an Intelligence firm based out of London with a network of analysts, researchers, and investigators worldwide.

• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions

Critical Thinking for Intelligence Analysis

Learn what critical thinking is, the different kinds of reasoning, identifying assumptions and analyzing arguments to take charge of your thinking and apply it to intelligence analysis work.

Enroll in ICAT101

About This Intelligence Community Online Course

Critical thinking skills are integral to the success of intelligence analysts in tackling hard challenges in support of the mission of their Intelligence Community customers.

The most successful intelligence analyst can identify assumptions, analyze arguments, draw relevant conclusions and ultimately applying these skills to their work.

This course demystifies, discusses and provides application techniques for critical thinking in an intelligence analysis context. We will cover how to draw connections to your own work experience by analyzing and critiquing case studies.

This online course is aligned to the Defense Intelligence Agency Certified Defense All-Source Analyst certification Body of Knowledge Topic Area 4 – Creative and Critical Thinking.

What You Will Learn

• Define critical thinking and its importance to intelligence analysis
• Describe the difference between inductive, deductive and abductive reasoning
• Demonstrate the ability to identify underlying assumptions
• Demonstrate the ability to analyze an argument

Your Instructor

This course was developed by Dr. J. Keith Dunbar . Dr. Dunbar is the founder and chief executive officer of FedLearn.

He is a former naval intelligence officer whose career culminated with a tour of duty as the director of the Global Learning Solutions Group and the Leadership Academy, Academy for Defense Intelligence, at the Defense Intelligence Agency. After retiring from the U.S. Navy, Dr. Dunbar led the learning and talent development organizations at two large government contractor companies, SAIC and Leidos.

He received his Doctorate in Education from the University of Pennsylvania (in a partnership with the Wharton Business School) and his Master of Science in strategic intelligence from the National Intelligence University.

Who Should Take This Online Course

This online course is designed for anyone interested in improving their critical thinking skills—particularly, intelligence analysts working in either Federal government agencies or government contractor companies.

Prerequisites

Prior completion of the FedLearn courses, Evaluating Evidence for Intelligence Analysis (ICAT118) and Marshaling Evidence for Intelligence Analysis (ICAT120) , are  strongly recommended .

Course Certificate

To achieve a course certificate of completion, you must score  80 percent or higher on graded lesson quizzes and a final exam.

Course Format

Self-paced, online training course

Course Pricing

Individual courses  are $89 (per person).

Seat licenses  to access the entire FedLearn Intelligence Community catalog are also available.  Click here to learn more and purchase.

If you are interested in learning about special team rates for Federal government and government contractor organizations, email  [email protected] .

Continuing Education Unit Credits

This course provides 2 CEUs.

Smarter Learning for Mission Success. Anytime. Anywhere.

Transforming online learning for the Federal government and contractor organizations.

© 2024 FedLearn, Inc. All Rights Reserved