critical thinking exercises for social workers

What Is Critical Thinking in Social Work?

• Career Advice
• Frustrations at Work
• ')" data-event="social share" data-info="Pinterest" aria-label="Share on Pinterest">
• ')" data-event="social share" data-info="Reddit" aria-label="Share on Reddit">
• ')" data-event="social share" data-info="Flipboard" aria-label="Share on Flipboard">

Effective Communication Skills for Social Workers

Top 5 values in being a social worker, legal & ethical issues facing social workers.

• Clinical Model Vs. Developmental Model in Social Work Practice
• Emotional Stresses of Being a Clinical Psychologist

Social workers offer many valuable services to people in need. They provide mental health services, such as diagnosis and counseling, advocate for clients who are unable to do so themselves, provide direct care services, such as housing assistance and help clients obtain social services benefits. The ability to remain open-minded and unbiased while gathering and interpreting data, otherwise known as critical thinking, is crucial for helping clients to the fullest extent possible. Critical thinking is one of the top skills required to be a successful social worker.

Meaning of Critical Thinking

The Foundation for Critical Thinking describes critical thinking as the ability to analyze, synthesize, evaluate and apply new information. Critical thinking in social work practice involves looking at a person or situation from an objective and neutral standpoint, without jumping to conclusions or making assumptions. Social workers spend their days observing, experiencing and reflecting on all that is happening around them.

In your role as a social worker, you obtain as much data as possible from interviews, case notes, observations, research, supervision and other means. Social workers must be self-aware of their feelings and beliefs. Stereotypical biases or prejudices must be recognized and not allowed to influence thinking when assembling a plan of action to help your clients to the highest level possible.

Importance of Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is important for the development of social work skills in direct practice. Social workers help people from all walks of life and come across people or populations with experiences, ideas and opinions that often vary from their own culture and background. Clients may be misunderstood and misjudged if thinking critically does not take place in a social context.

Applying critical thinking and analysis in social work helps social workers formulate a treatment plan or intervention for working with a client. First, you need to consider the beliefs, thoughts or experiences that underlie your client's actions without making a snap decision. What seems crazy or irrational to you at first may in fact be better understood in the context of cultural and biopsychosocial factors that play a role in your client's life. Critical thinking helps you objectively examine these factors, consider their importance and impact on your course of action, while simultaneously maintaining professional detachment and a non-biased attitude.

Interrelated Critical Thinking Skills

To develop critical thinking skills as a social worker, you need to have the ability to self-reflect and observe your own behaviors and thoughts about a particular client or situation. Self-awareness, observation and critical thinking are closely intertwined and impact your ability to be an effective social worker. For example, observing your gut reactions and initial responses to a client without immediately taking action can help you identify transference and counter-transference reactions, which can have a negative or harmful impact on your client.

Self-reflection is particularly important when working with clients who have very different or very similar backgrounds and beliefs to your own. You don't want your abilities to be clouded by your own preconceived notions or biases. Likewise, you don't want to merge with a client with whom you over-identify because you come from very similar situations or have had similar experiences.

Purpose of Clinical Supervision

Social workers engage in clinical practice under professional supervision to hone their critical thinking abilities. According to the Administration for Children and Families , clinical supervision not only encourages critical thinking but also helps social workers develop other core social work skills. Clinical experiences focus on maintaining positive social work ethics, self-reflection and the ability to intervene in crises.

Many, if not most, social work settings require or, at least offer, the opportunity to participate in peer, individual or group supervision. Discussing your cases or clients with a supervisor or with colleagues can help you sort out your own opinions and judgments and prevent these issues from impacting your work.

• The Center for Critical Thinking: Defining Critical Thinking
• Administration for Children and Families: Clinical Supervision

Related Articles

Why acceptance is important as a social worker, how not to impose your values on clients, what are some assumptions for working as a social worker, skills needed to be a clinical social worker, distinguishing characteristics of social work, what qualities make a good developmental psychologist, social work interviewing skills, social counselor pay scale & education required, differences between psychologists & clinical social workers, most popular.

• 1 Why Acceptance Is Important as a Social Worker
• 2 How Not to Impose Your Values on Clients
• 3 What Are Some Assumptions for Working as a Social Worker?
• 4 Skills Needed to Be a Clinical Social Worker

Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.

We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.

Brief introduction to this section that descibes Open Access especially from an IntechOpen perspective

Want to get in touch? Contact our London head office or media team here

Our team is growing all the time, so we’re always on the lookout for smart people who want to help us reshape the world of scientific publishing.

Home > Books > Empathy Study

Critical Thinking in Social Work Training

Submitted: 14 July 2019 Reviewed: 04 September 2019 Published: 15 November 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89538

Cite this chapter

There are two ways to cite this chapter:

From the Edited Volume

Empathy Study

Edited by Makiko Kondo and Bala Nikku

To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. www.cbspd.com | [email protected]

Chapter metrics overview

1,235 Chapter Downloads

Impact of this chapter

Total Chapter Downloads on intechopen.com

Total Chapter Views on intechopen.com

It is the look at the that leads us to questioning and the answers guide us to updating and the production of knowledge. There is always, in the debates of social work professionals, the question of the search for an intervention project that gives a new meaning to the profession in order to respond, not only theoretically coherent but also efficiently, to the demands placed upon them. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the importance of critical thinking in the training of social workers. The research is based on an exploratory study carried out with recently graduated university students, whose results point to the benefits of this soft skill in the ability to analyze, understand interactions, detect inconsistencies, systematic problem-solving, reflect on beliefs and values, and reintegrate information as a whole.

• critical thinking
• social work
• soft skills

Author Information

Helena belchior-rocha *.

• Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology (CIES-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal

Inês Casquilho-Martins

*Address all correspondence to: [email protected]

1. Introduction

The development of skills in critical thinking by students of higher education is nowadays, faced by the challenges of society and the job market place, essential for professional and personal success. This theme has been the subject of increasing reflection and encouragement by different national and international bodies and entities, such as A3ES, 1 the European Commission, OECD, the World Economic Forum, etc. However, despite the interest expressed, there is still a long way for critical thinking to be a generalized priority in the pedagogical practices of teachers, promoted in an intentional, systematic, and transversal way to any area of knowledge.

Thinking about it, in 2009, the Soft Skills Lab (SSL) with the intention of giving students the possibility of complementing their curriculum with soft skills, among which is critical thinking, was created in our university. 2 Being both teachers in social work and critical thinking at the LCT, we decided to carry out this exploratory study to understand the impact of this curricular unit on newly graduated students.

A partial and non-critical view can compromise the performance of any professional, and it is no different with social workers. Common sense concepts are so embedded in our society that even social work students, most of the time, at the beginning of the graduation have a completely wrong idea about what the profession is. The knowledge provided by common sense lead people to believe that the social worker is a kind of a good Samaritan, and this is only one of the challenges students are going to face.

Over time, reality is altered and new conceptions are incorporated into the way of living, learning, acting, interacting, and thinking. The new resources that are constantly added to the already existing ones have or should have the purpose of better serving the individual and society in general. Dealing with the new and complex situations of the contemporary world requires more and more expertise in ways of thinking and acting and relating. Faced with this reality of constant transformations, how can we find autonomy to decide on what is relevant, important, pertinent, and ethical? Critical thinking fits into this question, when it serves as a filter to select what should be harnessed or discarded in this actual avalanche of instantaneous information.

Reflective analysis on the theoretical foundations and intervention models allows social workers to re-equate the directionality of professional action in the context of critical thinking that frames objectivity and questions the reality where it is intervened, as well as the meaning of this intervention in its micro, meso, and macro levels from local to global and from global to local, an exercise that social works constantly need.

As Granja says:

Knowing in Social Work means understanding the social problems as total social phenomena that arise from the operation of the structures and social relations, without denying the particularity of the individual processes and act with a mission to prevent and repair the structural inefficiencies that prevent the poorest from accessing indispensable resources for building themselves as full citizens [ 1 ].

Knowledge about the transformation of social reality requires an investment that results from a reflexive activity involving professionals, in a link between theoretical knowledge and practice, through an interdisciplinary approach that requires a theoretical synthesis built with other areas of social sciences, namely psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics, law, public and social policies, among others, which aims to “change the systems of opportunities, promote social relations dynamics and overcoming the deficit of civic participation” [ 1 ].

Social work practice focuses on social problems, that is, lack of income, unemployment, isolation and breakdown of social ties, domestic violence, children and young people at risk, school drop-out and failure, and migrants and refugees, among many others which by their complexity require a multidimensional combination of vulnerability and the articulation with structural phenomena and current social policies.

It is better evident for all the importance that critical thinking has in the education of future professionals, although it is nothing new, given the fact that is always in the debates of social work professionals the question of the search for an intervention project that gives a new meaning to the profession in order to respond, not only theoretically coherent but also efficiently, to the demands placed.

Social work as a profession has always demanded critical abilities and qualities from its practitioners because decisions have to be made “on the spot” and under pressure. With practice situations being so complex, the consequences of any decisions and action are extremely important [ 2 ].

A reflexive practice leads to thinking through the mediation of concepts and allows to reconstruct the problems and to construct new ways of solving problems. The ability to select data and identify patterns in the professional activity in order to be recognized and transmissible to become sources of knowledge and to be prepare for lifelong learning. For the development of this reflection, it is necessary to have a structured thought about the phenomena that allow analyzing and constructing operational representations.

This requirement goes beyond “competent practice” and demands “critical practice” [ 3 ], and the development of “critical being,” that is, a person who not only reflects critically on knowledge but also develops their powers of critical self-reflection and critical action [ 4 ].

In the research that Ford et al. [ 5 , 6 ] made on criticality with students in social work education, these ideas have been explored and they conclude that the intellectual resources for critical thinking are: (1) background knowledge; (2) critical concepts; (3) critical thinking standards; (4) strategies; and (5) habits of mind. This allows us to realize that this process has to be permanent and rooted as a mindset.

The more we know about a situation and the circumstances that caused it, the better we can articulate with a structural question, be it social, economic, cultural, or political, including beliefs, values in order to clarify the range of available options and solutions, so that the professional can make an informed decision about the problems that are dealing with.

Beginning to deal with this type of “how to” knowledge is where a practitioner’s ignorance becomes obvious and can cause anxiety. It may well be the reason why many new qualified workers take a very prescriptive, rule-based approach to try to ensure they do not do anything wrong. In many ways such a focus on detail and correctness ensures that practitioners can be more critically aware of what they are doing than experienced workers who have established routines [ 2 ].

Gray et al. add that “Social workers need to examine closely the strengths and limitations of research evidence. Regardless of how strong the evidence for a particular intervention might be, social workers are in a position where they must critically reflect on their work in the political, social, organizational, and interpersonal contexts, make professional judgements, engage in debate with decision-makers about resource allocation, negotiate appropriate practices and, when necessary, argue convincingly for the effectiveness of the work that is done. This requires skills in formulating and presenting well-supported arguments and the interpersonal and written communication skills to convey a position convincingly” [ 7 ].

Based on these assumptions, we did a review of the literature and developed an exploratory study with the aim of understanding the perception of recent students in social work about the importance of critical thinking.

2. The importance of critical thinking in education

According to the literature, the importance of critical thinking skills is recognized in the academic and professional contexts, in which the need to implement measures that facilitate their development and awareness of their usefulness is mentioned.

We find several approaches to critical thinking, some more vague, others more objective, but we cannot easily find a consensus between them, either in terms of definition, in terms of the terminology used, or in the type of methodology designed to develop it [ 8 , 9 ].

The scientific areas in which we can find greater literary production and investigation around critical thinking are philosophy, psychology, and education [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].

We find different contributions from the disciplinary areas mentioned above in an attempt to define critical thinking, and there are no definitions that fit exclusively in one or another area, since many of these authors cross the areas in terms of the research they develop. It is not our goal to find the best definition of critical thinking, or even the most complete one. The various theories focus on different aspects, put the focus on different circumstances, conceptualized in a way that is not always consensual and sometimes even antagonistic. Despite the differences, we find, in these definitions, points of convergence that we think allow us to have a perception about what critical thinking might actually be [ 10 , 13 ].

An argument goes from the premises to the conclusion and is one in which there are good reasons for the assumptions to be true, and in addition, the premises have good reasons to support or support the conclusion.

It is focused initially on the holistic assessment of a situation, not explicit reasoning and analysis. In other words, they establish the inductive or deductive links necessary to bring the different parts of a situation into a meaningful whole, to allow it to make sense. Every situation one experiences and faces may be different, but it is imperative to know enough of the parties to make general sense of the whole in order to start dealing with it.

The foundation for critical thinking defines critical thinking as:

the type of thinking—about any subject, content, or problem—in which the thinker improves the quality of his thinking by competently analyzing, evaluating and reconstructing it. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective. It presupposes consent to rigorous standards of excellence and a conscious control of its use. It implies effective communication and problem-solving skills, as well as a commitment to surpass our natural egocentrism and sociocentrism [ 14 ].

According to the Delphi Report, referenced by Facione, in addition to the skills associated with critical thinking, there are still a set of aptitudes, divided into two approaches: one related to life skills in general, and another related to specific issues, doubts, and problems. Regarding the first, the Delphi Report describes the following as critical thinker’s skills: (1) curiosity over a wide variety of issues; (2) concern about becoming and staying well informed; (3) alert to opportunities to use critical thinking; (4) trust in the rational research process; (5) confidence in your own reasoning abilities; (6) open mind regarding divergent views about the world; (7) flexibility when considering alternatives and opinions; (8) understanding of the opinions of others; (9) honesty in the evaluation of reasoning; (10) honesty when confronted by our own egocentric and sociocentric prejudices, stereotypes, and tendencies; (11) caution in the suspension, elaboration or alteration of judgments; and (12) predisposition to reconsider and revise viewpoints, where honest reflection suggests change is necessary [ 15 , 16 ].

Regarding the approach related to specific issues, the Delphi Report refers the following as aptitudes: (1) clarity in affirming an issue or concern; (2) method in dealing with complexity; (3) diligence in searching for relevant information; (4) reasonability in the selection and application of criteria; (5) concern to focus attention on the subject; (6) persistence despite any difficulties that may arise; and (7) accuracy to the level allowed by subject and circumstance.

Critical thinking is multidimensional, encompassing the intellectual (logic, rationality), psychological (self-consciousness, empathy), sociological (in terms of socio-historical context), ethics (norms and moral evaluation), and philosophical (meaning of nature and human life) [ 17 ].

It is also due to its characteristics of transversatility and multidimensionality that the authors argue that critical thinking has for centuries been the basis for the creation and maintenance of a democratic and democratically participative society, qualified by an active, pluralistic, and autonomous citizenship [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].

In education, we highlight pioneering authors who have emphasized critical thinking (although with other terminologies), from the Greek philosopher Socrates and the concepts of “knowledge” and “maièutica,” to the American philosopher, psychologist, and educator John Dewey, and reflection on “thinking” and “reflecting” [ 23 , 24 ].

Dewey is even considered the “father” of the modern tradition of critical thinking [ 25 ] when, in the early twentieth century, he advocated the need for education to prepare students for the complex demands of citizenship and the world of work [ 26 ].

The debate about the operationalization of critical thinking, the development and teaching of critical thinking, the skills of critical thinking, and the evaluation of critical thinking, are thus essential topics in education from the last decades of the twentieth century until now, specifically for social work, a recent study in this area recommends a future research agenda for critical thinking [ 27 ]. As competence, or set of competencies, critical thinking can be developed and evaluated. In this sense, the exploratory study presented here intends to contribute to the evaluation of the importance that students attribute to critical thinking, as well as to the evaluation of critical thinking as competence.

2.1 Social work education and critical thinking

The twentieth century imposes on contemporary social work the challenge of establishing theoretical categories and methodologies that broaden its interdisciplinary horizon and stimulate the conception of the human being as a builder of its own reality [ 28 ]. The increasing complexity leads us to the search for alternatives, skills, and a competence to manage the theoretical-practical process, related to the attempt to understand the reality in constant movement, the tendencies and the possibilities that are put to our daily lives.

Social work education in Portugal according to Branco [ 29 ] “focuses on the dynamics of break and continuity between its pivotal socio-political periods and international influences” the same author in its latest article marks these periods saying that:

The social work education itinerary in Portugal during the period between the Republican Regime foundations (1910), the constitution of Estado Novo (1933–1945), the succession of Salazar (1968), the revolutionary crises associated with the Carnation Revolution of 1974 and the academisation period (1989 to the present) [ 29 ].

Questions related to the production of knowledge and the dissemination of this same knowledge arise later (also for socio-historical reasons), with the affirmation of the profession as a specific area of knowledge. In Portugal, with the development of the academic career in the area of social work, (undergraduate, master, and doctorate), the theoretical and practical dimensions, namely training, intervention, and research, have been developing and, consequently, we have assisted to a greater theoretical production (in the form of theses, dissertations, articles, and books) and an intensification of the research effort and its dissemination, which has given to Portuguese social work a greater visibility among the scientific community [ 30 ].

Consequently, the construction of knowledge was imposed as a means of awareness of the subjects involved in the teaching-learning process, in a critical perspective of knowledge as a tool for the realization of the political-professional ethical project and for the transformation of the socio-institutional and political- cultural reality. This awareness has undoubtedly been one of the means for advancing professional maturity.

The experience of this critical thinking course comes from the university, where the study was done through the creation in 2009 of a Cross Skills Laboratory to give students extra skills with the aim of developing a reflexive practice that, rather than aiming at the constitution of a stabilized knowledge, intends to develop the capacities of reflexivity and action; understand the importance of critical thinking in academic and professional context; identify the elements and analyze simple and complex arguments; recognize errors on daily speech; assess the quality of arguments and argumentative texts; and create simple and complex arguments in oral debates and written texts. The students that successfully complete this curriculum unit will be able to analyze arguments regarding their structure and content; argue on an issue; identify the deductive validity on propositions; and question arguments, identifying its weaknesses.

According to Jones “Critical thinking can lead us to open up self-doubt and this is a good thing because it lead us to really examine why we think and act as we do” [ 31 ] and “Developing an ability to understand why you react and think as you do is part of a recognition of you own inner resources” [ 31 ] this author also argues that:

To be able to think about how we, and others, think—thinking about thinking. In doing this you will be thinking about the reasoning, motives and arguments of others. You will have the ability to see all sides of the question and analyze its strengths and weak-in these [ 31 ].

And is corroborated by other authors that alert us by saying that

The technical rationality model also fails to recognize how understanding is developed from the integration of theory and practice (…) Reflective learning incorporates both theoretical and practical themes and issues and seeks to integrate these—to open a dialogue between theory and practice [ 32 ].

It is a continuous process of reflection and allows the interveners to develop their theory directly from their experience. In addition, it allows you to “tailor” your intervention to each specific context using a range of non-defined skills and perspectives.

3. Methodology

The present study is exploratory and quantitative and aims to understand the perception of recent graduate students in social work on the importance of learning critical thinking in higher education and its impact on the labor market.

It aims to identify the potential of learning critical thinking during its formation, including future usefulness in the professional field. Although we do not intend to prove hypotheses, we seek to explore the results based not only on the perception of the respondents, but also to categorize the critical-thinking skills acquired as potentialities in teaching in social work and as knowledge of support to the professional exercise.

In a universe of 154 newly graduated students between 2015 and 2017, whose training integrated the curricular unit of critical thinking in their curriculum, we used an intentional sample of 79 individuals recently graduated in social work.

A bibliographical review was made on the subject and we used as a data collection technician, a questionnaire in which we used a Likert scale of level 5. The Likert scales [ 33 ] are widely used to measure postures and opinions with a higher level of a question of “yes” or “no,” in this questionnaire was composed of a set of sentences (items) in relation to each one of which the respondents were asked to express the degree of agreement from the non-positive (level 1), until very positive (level 5). We also added two questions to understand the degree of satisfaction with the critical thinking training with a scale from 0 to 10, in which 0 was totally dissatisfied and 10 totally satisfied and an open question to perceive the benefits and disadvantages of learning critical thinking.

The questionnaire was divided into two parts: socio-demographic characterization and the identification of the importance of critical thinking contribution as training in its learning.

The age of the participants is between 21 and 45 years, with an average of 24.5 years, mostly females, 87.3, 91.1% Portuguese and 78.5% is inserted in the job market (as social workers) and 94.4% attended this curricular unit in the first year of the degree.

Ability to analyze

Systematic problem solving

Understand interactions and detect inconsistencies

Reflection on beliefs and values

The reintegration of information as a whole

We are aware that one of the limitations of this study is that there is no credit for its generalization [ 34 ] given the fact that it has a small sample (although representative in terms of results for our university) and is exploratory.

Another limitation is that the respondents themselves may have given skewed responses because they know the purpose of the study, they may want to appreciate the university that formed them and give answers that they consider “correct.” It was attempted to overcome this limitation by saying that both the institution and the participants would be anonymous.

We intend to continue this study in a first phase at national level with partnerships with other universities and later extend to a study in the Iberian Peninsula (Portugal-Spain).

The results show that the majority of respondents considered that the contents seized in their critical thinking training were positive or very positive with Likert scores (1–5) between 4.53 and 3.89. The average of responses in the different categories considered the impact of the contents acquired positive 50.55% and very positive 35.27%, understanding this competence as an active element of learning as students, stimulating a clear, logical, and organized thinking, helping to develop the necessary skills during the frequency of higher education and currently in the labor market ( Figure 1 ).

Distribution of respondents’ answers on the current impacts of content acquired during their training.

According to the results, the greatest impact of learning was reflected in the development of strategies for decision-making and in the capacity to train a rigorous analytical view, both with a mean score in the answers of 4.53 (Likert scale-Ls). These figures translate into the impacts of these two categories, which were considered positive by 36.71% of the respondents and very positive by 58.23%. It is also noted that 5.06% of the respondents consider neither positive nor negative.

The identification of the barriers to critical thinking obtained the highest percentage of answers with the classification of positives (67.09%) along with the diagnosis in problem solving (63.29%). In the categories of preparation for problem solving and articulation of daily information, there was a balanced preference for responses, mainly considering positive or very positive.

Respondents answered that the impact on the preparation for problem solving was both very positive (44.30%) and positive (44.30%), considering neither positive or negative 10.13% nor negative 1.27%. In the articulation of information with the everyday situations, 46.84% was very positive, 44.30 positive, and 8.86 neither positive nor negative.

Regarding the ability to identify argumentation errors, 25.32% of the respondents answered that the impacts were neither positive nor negative. This is the category in which neutrality assumes greater expression, although it continues to be less than the responses that consider the very positive (37.97%) and positive (36.71%).

As for the less-valued aspects, but still with an average that considers these competences as positive, are the dimensions of acquisition of learning strategies through reading (3.89 Ls) and acquisition of learning strategies through listening (3.99 Ls). The responses in these two categories vary in their distribution, and the acquisition of learning strategies through reading 32.91% of the respondents considered that the impact of this competence was neither positive nor negative, while 45.57% considered that it was positive and 21.52% which was very positive.

Regarding the acquisition of learning strategies through listening 20.25% considered that was very positive, 59.49% positive, 18.99% that was neither positive nor negative, and 1.27 responded that the impact was negative.

In the acquisition of research techniques and information systematization, most of the answers were positive 55.23%, positive for 22.78% of the respondents, and 16.46% neither positive nor negative. This competence was the one with a residual value, presented the highest percentage of responses that considered the negative impact (2.53%).

The comprehension of the structure of an argumentative text and the acquisition of competences for an argumentative discourse were both considered 55 by 0.70% of the respondents as having a positive impact. The understanding of the structure of an argumentative text also registered 34.18% of responses that indicate a very positive impact and 10.13% that consider that the impact was neither positive nor negative.

In the acquisition of competences for a care argumentative discourse 33.91% considered to have had a very positive impact and 11.39% did not have a positive or negative impact. The ability to develop abstract reasoning was for 26.58% of the respondents considered very positive, 53.16% positive, and 20.25% neither negative nor positive. The break with common sense was perceived as a competence with a very positive impact by 53.16% of the respondents, 37.97% answered that the impact on this competence was very positive, and the remaining ones were neither positive nor negative, 8.86%.

Finally, the acquisition of skills for clear and objective writing had 48.10% considering that the impact of the contents acquired was positive, followed by 26.71% of the responses as very positive and 15.19% which was neither positive nor negative. Other aspects analyzed were the satisfaction with the curricular unit of critical thinking and professional satisfaction, as well as the aspects that were considered as advantages or disadvantages in their training.

Using a satisfaction scale of 0–10 in which 0 is totally unsatisfied and 10 is fully satisfied, the highest number of equal answers with the classification 8 regarding satisfaction with the program they had in their training of critical thinking was 32.91% of the respondents and 34.18% with the same classification relative to the importance in the labor market. The answers ranged from 4 to 10 in both questions, with the average rating being 7.57 and 7.67, respectively.

In addition to the satisfaction with critical thinking learning in both academic and professional spheres, among the main advantages, respondents identified the improvement of their attention and observation abilities of the real world, as well as the contribution in the decision-making supported by an exercise of rational discernment. It was also mentioned the improvement of the capacities to identify key ideas avoiding irrelevant elements, the facilitation in the process of transmitting ideas and perspectives, and the development of this competence to various situations and contexts. There were no disadvantages to register except for the reference to the difficulty in interpreting texts and access to scientific sources of information.

About the importance of critical thinking associated with the issue of values and beliefs and of a more comprehensive thinking, respondents considered the knowledge acquired with critical thinking as extremely important because it allows them to question universal opinions, general judgments, and mind-beliefs, in order to be able to perform quality work in their intervention with people.

5. Discussion

This exploratory study gives us the perception that the recent graduate students in social work who attended the critical thinking curricular unit valued this learning in their training, but also in the usefulness and articulation with the job market.

Participants’ responses show that the majority of respondents considered that the competences learned in their training in critical thinking were positive or very positive, with critical thinking being an active element in their higher education, stimulating reflection and acting capacities in the service domain of a clear, logical and systematized form, helping to develop the skills needed during higher education attendance and currently in the labor market.

5.1 Ability to analyze

Among the dimensions analyzed stand the development of strategies to support decision-making and analytical capacity through rigorous and systematized procedures. The development of strategies for decision-making includes efficient, quick, and objective forms of planning in the analysis of situations. Here, it includes the ways of acting in complex situations that aim for more efficient and effective responses through thought patterns that can increase the confidence and assertiveness of the responses when implementing them.

The training capacity of a rigorous analytical vision leads to a cognitive reflection, free of opinions and value judgments, focusing on a critical action of analysis of information, facts and events, and managing to select and systematize what is significant in an idea developed or presented. It also promotes a process of evaluation of evidence and facts at the expense of opinions, as well as a reflection on the issues in a structured, logical, and informed way.

The acquisition of research techniques and systematization of information refers to the training of valid and reliable bibliographic research and the careful use of information sources. It is necessary to establish critical thinking in premises based on evidence, supported by theoretical or empirical data.

Although with a less significant expression, the competences of acquiring learning strategies through reading and listening are also present in the development of this competence. It is important to apply research and information selection processes in written texts, the analysis of written narratives, and documentary information to support the development of critical thinking, as well as the listening of oral, synchronous, or asynchronous narratives that allow the acquisition of information to support the construction of logical and consistent reasoning.

5.2 Systematic problem solving

It is also highlighted the importance of critical thinking as support for diagnosis and problem solving, focusing on the ability to analyze and evaluate situations, looking at them by different prisms, particularly in relation to issues associated with ideologies, religion, ethics, or human behavior.

The preparation of these professionals for the resolution of problems and for the articulation of daily information promotes competences for an accuracy in the way they reflected and act when facing questions that imply the analysis of a complex situation, dilemmas or unforeseen situations, developing the training for think and anticipate problems critically, generating solutions that are useful in solving problems, in project management or in the way different parts of an activity or task is developed.

In this field, the capacity to observe reality and current analysis through the collection and application of information in plural and multidimensional contexts is highlighted and allows the development of forms of analysis and adaptation in different areas and groups in the face of a diversified reality of constant transformations.

5.3 Understand interactions and detect inconsistencies

The understanding of the structure of an argumentative text and the acquisition of competences for the construction of a discourse are developed competences that allow the identification of reasons and conclusions, together with the evaluation of the premises that support the presented conclusions.

It encompasses the ability to identify points of view in a clear, systematic, and objective way, identifying simple and complex lines of reasoning. It also contributes to a better communication and interaction with others, achieving through a clearer discourse to present convincing quality arguments and reinforcing points of view in a structured way.

This relates to a process that involves conscious choices, supported by evidence that gives strength to our discourse, be it oral or written, allowing cumulatively to be able to interpret and deconstruct our ideas and others ideas. It also allows for an evolution in the capacities of relationship and communication, making possible the selection about what is more or less relevant.

The ability to detect inconsistencies in performance, through the identification of fallacies, refers to the development of the ability to recognize the most common argumentations failures and to be attentive to failures in the arguments of others.

It makes possible to identify errors of argumentation with a competence that contributes to finding weaknesses and strengths in the discourses of others and be able to counteract them, as well as to formulate its own arguments. It also highlights the ability to recognize information manipulation techniques and fallacies and present a well-grounded, clear, and organized perspective in order to convince others. It also promotes a correct grammatical and conceptual use, avoiding abstract, vague or general terms that compromise attention-getting to what is central to the argument, through precise, specific, and concrete language.

5.4 Reflection on beliefs and values

The importance of overcoming the barriers to critical thinking are recognized as a relevant aspect that refers to the pertinence of the approach of this theme, resulting in the development of skills of conceptualization of criticism and overcoming inhibition to criticism and in the ability to be free of emotional influences or affective, avoiding that they affect the clarity of the reasoning and must be analyzed by the evidences.

Also, it is recognized that common sense is capable of creating absolutisms all the time and the tendency of the great mass of our society is to absorb them easily; creating a vision of the world capable of guiding our whole existence. We are hardly willing to question what is going on around us and seek a second opinion of the facts. Instead, we prefer the convenience of thinking like others, following the vast majority, prefer superficiality. Because it is hard work creating critical thinking, these students create added value in both professional and personal life and it’s a lifelong tool.

5.5 The reintegration of information as a whole

The capacity for development of abstract reasoning aims to identify the positioning of others, arguments, and conclusions, leading to innovation processes. It develops concepts and ideas analysis skills from a more systemic and global perspective. Rupture with common sense contributes to the use of facts as support for action to the detriment of individual knowledge supported by lack of evidence, aiding in the foundation of arguments, and ideas that are proven theoretically or empirically.

Some research [ 35 ] refers that as they are in control of their thoughts, that is, they are aware, understand, self-direct, and self-evaluate; have “tacit knowledge” groups that form “patterns” and represent the learning and generalization of previous experiences, research, and theory; recognize other significant patterns and principles and irrelevant aspects in a situation and bind to these existing known patterns and thus assess in depth (patterns or contours formed in the mind) that when adapted to the problem suggest solution procedures and periodically checks us for review, progress, and evaluate results.

6. Conclusions

Teaching is a privileged context for the development of critical thinking in individuals, and the teacher plays a fundamental role in the conduct of this complex process with theoretical, practical, and motivational components of active learning [ 10 ].

Experts in the area of critical thinking collaborated in the definition of strategies and methodologies of approach for the operationalization of the development of these competences in educational contexts, as in the case of the Delphi Report already mentioned, that resulted from the meeting of a group of experts with the objective, through the Delphi Method, to constitute a set of propositions and recommendations that would act as guiding lines for education agents and other professionals related to this area, regarding teaching, and evaluation of critical thinking.

In pedagogical terms, there are different ways of teaching and exercising critical thinking among students. The two most common approaches are: the creation of a course or program specifically dedicated to the development of critical thinking; and the incorporation of the development of critical thinking in curricular subjects.

Based on the literature, we cannot say that one approach is more effective than the other, but we can say that the perception of the key benefits that our graduated students report in conducting our critical thinking programs refers to ensuring good practice that is already being realized through discussions with others and the link between theory and practice to rethink their practices, allowing them to perceive when they fall into the bureaucratic routine and adopt more appropriate methods and approaches.

An awareness and acceptance of uncertainty in the practice of any professional is an important way to lessen stress. There are no perfect solutions out there to find, so we cannot be called on to work perfectly. If we accept the fact that the things we do or decide on are still dependent on something uncertain or on future happenings, and work in a way that takes account of that (i.e. constantly reviewing the things we deal with, decide on, or do), then this is really what “thinking critically” is all about [ 2 ].

The key is to strike a balance between the need for certainty and the need to be aware of other ways of doing or thinking about practice. This is where critical reflection (especially involving others) can play a key role in building trust by analyzing practice based on strengths, but also allows consideration of alternative options, points of view, etc., within a space safe, and where uncritical rigidity is not established.

These characteristics should be present not only in the students but also in the teachers. They must know how to model the learning they want to pass. Is it possible to give classes that do not develop these skills but reach other academic goals? Of course yes. But, it is also possible to achieve academic goals, curricular goals, and programmatic content by developing these skills at the same time.

Not least, we find the evaluation. In order to gauge how the process is going, we must evaluate. It is a great challenge to evaluate these skills, it is true. It will be easier to evaluate if you have memorized dates and locations. But as it is a challenge to know how much a student contributed in a group work and not fail to do so, we cannot give up to train our students in skills that will be valid for the rest of their lives because of the difficulty we encounter in the evaluation and the technology resources that allow new forms of formative and summative evaluation.

It cannot be forgotten that the surprises with which every social worker is confronted in everyday contacts and relationships need to be analyzed not only with common sense look but also with critical thinking and the autonomy of a thought based on solid concepts should be a factor of considerable importance. This will mean that in each complex situation, the values that underpin knowledge are at the service of conscious decision-making.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful and want to thank all the participants for their availability and collaboration, so that this study was possible.

The publication of this paper was supported by Portuguese national funds through Foundation for Science and Technology in the scope of the UID / SOC / 03126/2019 project. We appreciate the support given by the CIES-IUL and the funding of the Foundation for Science and Technology.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

• 1. Granja B, Queirós MC. Problemas e desafios da investigação em serviço social. Intervenção Social. 2011; 38 :233-251. ISSN: 0874-1611 (Portuguese)
• 2. Brown K, Rutter L. Critical Thinking for Social Work. 2nd ed. Southernhay East: Learning Matters Ltd.; 2008. 3, 42, 47 p. ISBN: 978 1 84445 157 9
• 3. Adams R, Dominelli L, Payne M, editors. Critical Practice in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002
• 4. Barnett R. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press; 1997. ISBN: 0 335 19703 5
• 5. Ford P, Johnston B, Mitchell R, Myles F. Social work education and criticality: Some thoughts from research. Social Work Education. 2004; 23 (2):185-198. DOI: 10.1080/0261547042000209198
• 6. Ford P, Johnston B, Mitchell R, Myles F. Practice learning and the development of students as critical practitioners: Some findings from research. Social Work Education. 2005; 24 (4):391-407. DOI: 10.1080/02615470500096910
• 7. Gray M, Plath D, Webb SA. Evidence-Based Social Work: A Critical Stance. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2009. ISBN 0-203-87662-89
• 8. Bailin S, Case R, Coombs JR, Daniels LB. Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 1999; 31 (3):285-302. DOI: 10.1080/002202799183133
• 9. Washburn P. The Vocabulary of Critical Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. ISBN: 0195324803
• 10. Almeida LS, Franco AHR. Critical thinking: Its relevance for education in a shifting society. Revista de Psicología. 2011; 29 (1):176-195. ISSN 0254-9247
• 11. Baker M, Rudd R. Relationships between critical and creative thinking. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research. 2001; 51 :173-188. http://www.jsaer.org/pdf/vol51Whole.pdf
• 12. Lai ER. Critical Thinking: A Literature Review—Research Report [Online]. Pearson Education; 2011. Available from: http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf [Accessed: 23 May 2019]
• 13. Halpern D. Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 1999; 80 :69-74. DOI: 10.1002/tl.8005
• 14. Foundation for Critical Thinking. Our Concept and Definition of Critical Thinking [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/our-conception-of-critical-thinking/411 [Accessed: 02 June 2019]
• 15. Facione PA. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction—Executive Summary “The Delphi Report” [Internet]. 1990a. Available from: http://assessment.aas.duke.edu/documents/Delphi_Report.pdf [Accessed: 02 June 2019]
• 16. Facione PA. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction—Research Findings and recommendations (ERIC Report No. ED315423) [Internet]. 1990b. Available from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED315423.pdf [Accessed: 23 May 2019]
• 17. Paul R, Elder L, Bartell T. California Teacher Preparation for Instruction in Critical Thinking (ERIC Report No. ED437379) [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED437379.pdf [Accessed: 23 May 2019]
• 18. Angeli C, Valanides N. Instructional effects on critical thinking: performance on ill-defined issues. Learning and Instruction. 2009; 19 :322-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.010
• 19. Brookfield SD. Developing Critical Thinkers: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1991. ISBN: 978-1-555-42356-8
• 20. Dewey J. Democracy and Education [Internet]. Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication; 2001. Available from: https://nsee.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/KnowledgeCenter/BuildingExpEduc/BooksReports/10.%20democracy%20and%20education%20by%20dewey.pdf [Accessed: 24 May 2019]
• 21. Freire P. Educação Como Prática da Liberdade. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Paz e Terra; 1967 (Brasilian)
• 22. Kuhn D. A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Research. 1999; 28 (2):16-46. DOI: 10.3102/0013189x028002016
• 23. Riddell T. Critical assumptions: Thinking critically about critical thinking. The Journal of Nursing Education. 2007; 46 (3):121-126. https://www.healio.com/journals/jne/2007-3-46-3/%7Bfd7bf35f-0615-4e21-9291-56bf66297a8f%7D/critical-assumptions-thinking-critically-about-critical-thinking#
• 24. Wang S-Y, Tsai J-C, Chiang H-C, Lai C-S, Lin H-J. Socrates, problem-based learning and critical thinking—A philosophic point of view. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2008; 24 (3 Supplement):S6-S13. DOI: 10.1016/s1607-551x(08)70088-3
• 25. Fisher A. Critical Thinking: An intrOduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001
• 26. Halpern D, Nummendal SG. Closing thoughts about helping students improve how they think. Teaching of Psychology. 1995; 22 (1):82-83. DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top2201_24
• 27. Verburgh A. Effectiveness of approaches to stimulate critical thinking in social work curricula. Studies in Higher Education. 2019; 44 (5):880-889. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1586336
• 28. Belchior Rocha H, Marques Ferreira P, Silva TP, Braz Ramalho V. Serviço social crítico: da modernidade à contemporaneidade. Alternativas: Cuadernos de Trabajo Social. 2013; 20 :79-90. DOI: 10.14198/ALTERN2013.20.05
• 29. Branco F. Social work education: The Portuguese story in a local and global perspective. Practice. 2018; 30 (4):271-291. DOI: 10.1080/09503153.2018.1485144
• 30. Leitão Ferreira J. Serviço social: Profissão e ciência. Contributos para o debate científico nas ciências sociais. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social. 2014; 27 (2):329-341. DOI: 10.5209/rev_CUTS.2014.v27.n2.44782
• 31. Jones S. Critical Learning for Social Work Students. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd; 2009. 93, 109 p. ISBN-13: 978-1844452019
• 32. Thompson N, Pascal J. Developing critically reflective practice. Reflective Practice. 2012; 13 (2):311-325. DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2012.657795
• 33. Lima L. Atitudes: Estrutura e mudança. In: Vala J, Monteiro MB, editors. Psicologia Social. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian; 2000 (Portuguese)
• 34. Kates S. A qualitative exploration into voters’ ethical perceptions of political advertising: Discourse, disinformation, and moral boundaries. Journal of Business Ethics. 1998; 17 (16):1871-1885. DOI: 10.1023/a:1005796113389
• 35. Macaulay C. Transfer of learning. In: Cree VE, Macaulay C, editors. Transfer of Learning in Professional and Vocational Learning. London: Routledge; 2000. pp. 1-26. ISBN: 0415204194
• A3ES is our National Accreditation Agency for higher education courses.
• It is a public University with 15 graduations, 49 masters, 22 PhDs, and around 8868 students.

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

Edited by Makiko Kondo

Published: 09 September 2020

By Makiko Kondo, Sachie Okanishi, Etsuko Arai, Kumiko...

759 downloads

By Noriko Okabe

1770 downloads

By José de Almeida Brites, Américo Baptista, Catarina...

1225 downloads

Social Work Toolbox: 37 Questions, Assessments, & Resources

This may be because of its unlikely position, balanced between “the individual and society, the powerful and the excluded” (Davies, 2013, p. 3).

Social work is a unique profession because of its breadth and depth of engagement and the many governmental and private organizations with which it engages.

Not only does it help individuals and groups solve problems in psychosocial functioning, but it also attempts to support them in their life-enhancing goals and ultimately create a just society (Suppes & Wells, 2017).

This article provides a toolbox for social workers, with a selection of assessments and resources to support them in their role and career.

Before you continue, we thought you might like to download our three Positive Psychology Exercises for free . These science-based exercises will explore fundamental aspects of positive psychology including strengths, values, and self-compassion, and will give you the tools to enhance the wellbeing of your clients, students, or employees.

This Article Contains:

6 best resources for social workers, top 17 questions to ask your clients, 2 assessments for your sessions, social work & domestic violence: 5 helpful resources, our 3 favorite podcasts on the topic, resources from positivepsychology.com, a take-home message.

Demanding professions require dedicated and supportive resources that transform social work theory into practice. The following worksheets and tools target some of the most challenging and essential areas of social work (Rogers, Whitaker, Edmondson, & Peach, 2020; Davies, 2013):

Emotional intelligence

“Understanding emotion arises from the combined consciousness of how we perceive emotions and use our intellect to make sense of them” (Rogers et al., 2020, p. 47).

For social workers, emotional intelligence is invaluable. They must develop and maintain awareness of both their own and their client’s feelings and use the insights to select appropriate interventions and communication strategies without becoming overwhelmed.

The Reflecting on Emotions in Social Work worksheet encourages social workers to stop and consider their feelings following an initial client visit.

In the worksheet, the social worker is guided to find some quiet time and space to reflect on:

• How do I feel about my initial visit?
• What are my thoughts regarding the purpose of the visit?
• How do I think I can proceed with developing a relationship with the client?
• How do I think the client feels about my visit?

Being self-aware is a crucial aspect of social work and will inform the ongoing relationship with the client.

Fostering empathy

Mirror neurons fire when we watch others performing an action or experiencing an emotion. They play a significant role in learning new skills and developing empathy for others’ experiences (Thomson, 2010).

Social workers must become more aware of service users’ experiences, as they can influence and affect the interaction with them.

Use the Fostering Empathy Reflectively worksheet to improve the understanding of your own and others’ emotions and increase the degree of empathy.

Observing others can make social workers more aware of human behavior and the emotions and thoughts underneath to increase their capacity for empathy.

Reflective cycle

Reflecting on situations encountered on the job can help social workers fully consider their own and their clients’ thoughts and feelings before drawing conclusions. Indeed, “successful reflection emphasizes the centrality of self-awareness and the capacity for analysis” (Rogers et al., 2020, p. 64).

Use the Reflective Cycle for Social Work to reflect on events, incidents, and behaviors in a structured and systematic way (modified from Gibbs, 1988).

Challenging social interactions

Good communication skills and confidence in social interactions are essential for social work. There will be times when you need assertiveness to challenge others to ensure the client’s needs are met (Rogers et al., 2020).

However, like all skills, social skills can be learned and maintained through education and practice.

The Preparing for Difficult Social Interactions worksheet considers how a situation or event may unfold through focusing on the essential issues.

Practice and role-play can help social workers prepare for a more successful social interaction and gain confidence in their coping abilities.

Motivational Interviewing in Social Work

“Change can become difficult for service users when they are ambivalent about the extent to which the change will be beneficial” (Davies, 2013, p. 451).

One method used by social workers to explore their clients’ intrinsic values and ambivalence is through motivational interviewing (MI). MI has four basic principles (modified from Davies, 2013):

• Expressing empathy Displaying a clear and genuine interest in the client’s needs, feelings, and perspective.
• Developing discrepancy Watching and listening for discrepancies between a client’s present behavior and values and future goals.
• Rolling with resistance Avoiding getting into arguments or pushing for change.
• Supporting self-efficacy Believing in the client’s capacity to change.

The Motivational Interviewing in Social Work worksheet uses the five stages of change to consider the client’s readiness for change and as input for selecting an appropriate intervention (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1986; Davies, 2013).

The client should be encouraged to create and implement a plan, including goals and details of the specific tasks required.

Respectful practices

Rogers et al. (2020) identified several fundamental values that social workers should be aware of and practice with their service users, families, and other organizations with which they engage. These include:

• Individuality
• Honesty and integrity

The Respectful Practices in Social Work worksheet encourages reflection on whether a social worker remains in touch with their values and the principles expected in their work.

Social workers should frequently think of recent examples of interactions with clients, families, and other organizations, and ask themselves (modified from Rogers et al., 2020):

• Were you polite, courteous, warm, and approachable?
• How well did you accept people with different beliefs and values from your own?
• Did you attempt to understand the person and their history?
• Were you professional, open, honest, and trustworthy?
• Did you treat each person equally, providing fair access to your time and resources?

A regular check-in to ensure high standards are being maintained and values remain clear will ensure the continued professionalism expected from a social worker.

The following questions provide practical examples; practitioners should tailor them according to timing and context and remain sensitive to the needs of all involved (Rogers et al., 2020; Suppes & Wells, 2017; Davies, 2013).

Open questions

Open questions encourage the respondent to reflect and respond with their feelings, thoughts, and personal experiences. For example:

• What is your view of what happened?
• What has it been like living with this issue?
• How could we work together to find a good solution?
• What are your greatest fears?

Closed questions

Typically, closed questions are used to find out personal details such as name and address, but they can also provide focus and clarity to confirm information. Closed questions are especially important when dealing with someone with cognitive impairment or who finds it difficult to speak up, and can lead to follow-up, open questions.

For example:

• How old are you?
• Are you in trouble?
• Are you scared?
• Do you need help?

Hypothetical questions

Hypothetical questions can be helpful when we need the service user to consider a potentially different future, one in which their problems have been resolved. Such questions can build hope and set goals. For example:

• Can you imagine how things would be if you did not live with the fear of violence?
• Where would you like to be in a few years after you leave school?
• Can you imagine what you would do if a similar situation were to happen again?

Strengths-based questions

“Focusing on strengths helps to move away from a preoccupation with risk and risk management” and builds strengths for a better future (Rogers et al., 2020, p. 243). Strengths-based questions in social work can be powerful tools for identifying the positives and adopting a solution-focused approach.

Examples include:

• Survival – How did you cope in the past?
• Support – Who helps you and gives you support and guidance?
• Esteem – How do you feel when you receive compliments?
• Perspective – What are your thoughts about the situation, issue, or problem?
• Change – What would you like to change, and how can I help?
• Meaning – What gives your life meaning?

Download 3 Free Positive Psychology Exercises (PDF)

Enhance wellbeing with these free, science-based exercises that draw on the latest insights from positive psychology.

Download 3 Free Positive Psychology Tools Pack (PDF)

By filling out your name and email address below.

Interventions in social work are often described as having four stages: engagement, assessment, intervention, and evaluation (Suppes & Wells, 2017).

The assessment stage typically involves:

• Collecting, organizing, and interpreting data
• Assessing a client’s strengths and limitations
• Developing and agreeing on goals and objectives for interventions
• Selecting strategies appropriate to the intervention

Assessment is an ongoing process that typically focuses on risk. It begins with the referral and only ends when the intervention is complete or the case closed.

Assessment will need to be specific to the situation and the individuals involved, but it is likely to consider the following kinds of risks (Rogers et al., 2020; Bath and North East Somerset Council, 2017):

General risk assessment

Risk management does not remove risk, but rather reduces the likelihood or impact of problematic behavior. Risk assessments are performed to identify factors that may cause risky behavior or events (Davies, 2013).

Questions include:

• What has been happening?
• What is happening right now?
• What could happen?
• How likely is it that it will happen?
• How serious could it be?

The wording and detail of each will depend on the situation, client, and environment, guided by the social worker’s training and experience.

Assessment of risk to children

A child’s safety is of the utmost importance. As part of the assessment process, a complete understanding of actual or potential harm is vital, including (modified from Bath and North East Somerset Council, 2017):

• Has the child been harmed? Are they likely to be harmed?
• Is the child at immediate risk of harm and is their safety threatened?
• If harmed previously, to what extent or degree? Is there likely to be harm in the future?
• Has there been a detrimental impact on the child’s wellbeing? Is there likely to be in the future?
• Is there a parent or guardian able and motivated to protect the child from harm?

Social workers must use professional judgment to assess the level of risk and assure the child’s ongoing safety.

Assessment process – Oregon Department of Human Services

The figures related to domestic violence are shocking. There are 1.3 million women and 835,000 men in the United States alone who are physically assaulted by a close partner each year (NASW, n.d.).

The NASW offers valuable resources to help social workers recognize the signs of existing domestic violence, prevent future violence, and help victims, including:

• We can help end domestic violence – information on how the White Ribbon Day Campaign is raising awareness of domestic violence

SocialWorkersToolBox.com is another website with a vast range of free social work tools and resources. This UK-based website has a range of videos and educational toolkits, including:

• Exploring Healthy Relationships: Resource Pack for 14–16-Year-Olds
• Parents’ Guide: Youth Violence, Knife Crime, and Gangs
• Family Meetings: Parents’ Guide and Templates
• Preventing Bullying: A Guide for Parents

Many of the worksheets are helpful for sharing with parents, carers, and organizations.

Here are three insightful podcasts that discuss many of the issues facing social workers and social policymakers:

• NASW Social Work Talks Podcast The NASW podcast explores topics social workers care about and hosts experts in both theory and practice. The podcast covers broad subjects including racism, child welfare, burnout, and facing grief.
• The Social Work Podcast This fascinating podcast is another great place to hear from social workers and other experts in the field. The host and founder is Jonathan Singer, while Allan Barsky – a lecturer and researcher – is a frequent guest. Along with other guests, various issues affecting social workers and policymakers are discussed.
• Social Work Stories Podcast hosts and social workers Lis Murphy, Mim Fox, and Justin Stech guide listeners through  all aspects of social work and social welfare.

17 Top-Rated Positive Psychology Exercises for Practitioners

Expand your arsenal and impact with these 17 Positive Psychology Exercises [PDF] , scientifically designed to promote human flourishing, meaning, and wellbeing.

Created by Experts. 100% Science-based.

Social workers should be well versed in a variety of theories, tools, and skills. We have plenty of resources to support experienced social workers and those new to the profession.

One valuable point of focus for social workers involves building strengths and its role in solution-focused therapy . Why not download our free strengths exercise pack and try out the powerful exercises contained within? Here are some examples:

• Strength Regulation By learning how to regulate their strengths, clients can be taught to use them more effectively.
• You at Your Best Strengths finding is a powerful way for social workers to increase service users’ awareness of their strengths.

Other free helpful resources for social workers include:

• Conflict Resolution Checklist Remove issues and factors causing or increasing conflict with this practical checklist .
• Assertive Communication Practicing assertive communication can be equally valuable for social workers and service users.

More extensive versions of the following tools are available with a subscription to the Positive Psychology Toolkit© , but they are described briefly below:

• Self-Contract

Commitment and self-belief can increase the likelihood of successful future behavioral change.

The idea is to commit yourself to making a positive and effective change by signing a statement of what you will do and when. For example:

I will do [goal] by [date].

• Cognitive Restructuring

While negative thoughts may not accurately reflect reality, they can increase the risk of unwelcome and harmful behavior.

This cognitive psychology tool helps people identify distorted and unhelpful thinking and find other ways of thinking:

• Step one – Identify automatic unhelpful thoughts that are causing distress.
• Step two – Evaluate the accuracy of these thoughts.
• Step three – Substitute them with fair, rational, and balanced thoughts.

Individuals can then reflect on how this more balanced and realistic style of thinking makes them feel.

If you’re looking for more science-based ways to help others enhance their wellbeing, this signature collection contains 17 validated positive psychology tools for practitioners. Use them to help others flourish and thrive.

Society and policymakers increasingly rely on social workers to help solve individual and group issues involving psychosocial functioning. But beyond helping people survive when society lets them down, social workers support them through positive change toward meaningful goals.

Social workers must be well equipped with social, goal-setting, and communication skills underpinned by positive psychology theory and developed through practice to be successful.

Reflection is crucial. Professionals must analyze their own and others’ emotions, thinking, and behavior while continuously monitoring risk, particularly when vulnerable populations are involved.

The nature of social work is to engage with populations often at the edge of society, where support is either not provided or under-represented.

This article includes tools, worksheets, and other resources that support social workers as they engage with and help their clients. Try them out and tailor them as needed to help deliver positive and lasting change and a more just society.

We hope you enjoyed reading this article. Don’t forget to download our three Positive Psychology Exercises for free .

• Bath and North East Somerset Council. (2017, June). Risk assessment guidance . Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://bathnes.proceduresonline.com/chapters/p_risk_assess.html
• Davies, M. (2013). The Blackwell companion to social work . Wiley Blackwell.
• Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods . Oxford Further Education Unit.
• National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Domestic violence media toolkit . Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.socialworkers.org/News/1000-Experts/Media-Toolkits/Domestic-Violence
• Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.) Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of chang e. Springer.
• Rogers, M., Whitaker, D., Edmondson, D., & Peach, D. (2020). Developing skills & knowledge for social work practice . SAGE.
• Suppes, M. A., & Wells, M. A. (2017). The social work experience: An introduction to social work and social welfare . Pearson.
• Thomson, H. (2010, April 14). Empathetic mirror neurons found in humans at last . New Scientist. Retrieved November 16, 2021, from https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627565-600-empathetic-mirror-neurons-found-in-humans-at-last/

Share this article:

Article feedback

What our readers think.

Thanks so much for including the Social Work Podcast in this article. One correction: Allan Barsky is a frequent guest, but Jonathan Singer is the founder and host.

Hi there Jonathan,

Thank you so much for bringing this to our attention! We are delighted that you are reading the blog as we are fans of your podcast as well.

We will adjust this right away so we can give credit where credit is due 🙂

Thanks for all that you do!

Kind regards, -Caroline | Community Manager

Petra, it does not hurt to see this information again. Some social workers are new at their jobs and can always benefit from hearing this info repeated. If you want to hear from social workers only, then encourage your peers and or colleagues to write this stuff from their perspective.

This article is demeaning and patronsing! As social workers – we have done our (at least) 4 years at uni and this stuff is social work 101. As psychologists – I find you often think you know best and can “tell” other professionals how to do their jobs. So – if you want to write something to social workers – get a social worker to write it! Petra van Vliet – proud and loud social worker

Let us know your thoughts Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Related articles

Hierarchy of Needs: A 2024 Take on Maslow’s Findings

One of the most influential theories in human psychology that addresses our quest for wellbeing is Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. While Maslow’s theory of [...]

Emotional Development in Childhood: 3 Theories Explained

We have all witnessed a sweet smile from a baby. That cute little gummy grin that makes us smile in return. Are babies born with [...]

Using Classical Conditioning for Treating Phobias & Disorders

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Classical conditioning, a psychological phenomenon first discovered by Ivan Pavlov in the late 19th century, has proven to [...]

Read other articles by their category

• Body & Brain (48)
• Coaching & Application (57)
• Compassion (26)
• Counseling (51)
• Emotional Intelligence (24)
• Gratitude (18)
• Grief & Bereavement (21)
• Happiness & SWB (40)
• Meaning & Values (26)
• Meditation (20)
• Mindfulness (45)
• Motivation & Goals (45)
• Optimism & Mindset (34)
• Positive CBT (28)
• Positive Communication (20)
• Positive Education (47)
• Positive Emotions (32)
• Positive Leadership (17)
• Positive Parenting (3)
• Positive Psychology (33)
• Positive Workplace (37)
• Productivity (16)
• Relationships (46)
• Resilience & Coping (36)
• Self Awareness (21)
• Self Esteem (37)
• Strengths & Virtues (31)
• Stress & Burnout Prevention (34)
• Theory & Books (46)
• Therapy Exercises (37)
• Types of Therapy (64)

3 Positive Psychology Tools (PDF)

• Find My Rep

You are here

Critical Thinking and Professional Judgement for Social Work

• Lynne Rutter - Bournemouth University, UK
• Keith Brown - Bournemouth University, UK
• Description

Critical thinking can appear formal and academic, far removed from everyday life where decisions have to be taken quickly in less than ideal conditions. It is, however, a vital part of social work, and indeed any healthcare and leadership practice.

Taking a pragmatic look at the range of ideas associated with critical thinking, this Fifth Edition continues to focus on learning and development for practice. The authors discuss the importance of sound, moral judgement based on critical thinking and practical reasoning, and its application to different workplace situations; critical reflection, and its importance to academic work and practice; and the connection between critical thinking ideas and professionalism.

Good overview on foundational issues in social work eduction. Easy to read thus appropriate for ESL students. Chapter on critical style proved valuable as a guideline to literature reviews.

This book is written in such a way that it appears the authors are actually speaking to the students and in fact uses 'we' which is as if it is a collegial journey to learning. The content is relevent and is well informed, analytical in enough detail without being too intimidating for non-academic students.

This concise and clearly-written volume is useful across a range of early-career post-qualifying modules.

Very helpful introduction to some introductory reflective learning concepts.

Helpful addition to the students reading list for their unit of study

a concise, revised and accessible text for any NQSW practitioner re their evolving professional practice and beyond in terms of their continual professional development. Revisits key essential themes within a fresh context especially liked Chapters 3 and 4. A useful reference text for any Practice Educator, SW educator and ASYE assessor.

Preview this book

For instructors.

Please select a format:

Select a Purchasing Option

• Electronic Order Options VitalSource Amazon Kindle Google Play eBooks.com Kobo

Related Products

• Science & Math
• Mathematics

Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.

If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Learn more about the program.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

Critical Thinking for Social Workers: Exercises for the Helping Professions Revised Edition

There is a newer edition of this item:.

Leonard Gibbs and Eileen Gambrill provide hands-on practice exercises which allow students to reflect on their judgement and critical thinking skills.

An Instructor′s Manual is available for adopters of the text, who request it on the letterhead of their institution.

• ISBN-10 0761986081
• ISBN-13 978-0761986089
• Edition Revised
• Publisher SAGE Publications, Inc
• Publication date October 22, 1998
• Language English
• Dimensions 8.25 x 0.75 x 10.75 inches
• Print length 304 pages
• See all details

Editorial Reviews

About the author, product details.

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ SAGE Publications, Inc; Revised edition (October 22, 1998)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 304 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0761986081
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0761986089
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.6 pounds
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 8.25 x 0.75 x 10.75 inches
• #2,384 in Algebra & Trigonometry
• #5,032 in Algebra
• #5,883 in Social Services & Welfare (Books)

About the author

Leonard e. gibbs.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top review from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Start Selling with Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

Free Social Work Tools and Resources: SocialWorkersToolbox.com

Worksheets, booklets, advice sheets, assessment templates and checklists, story books, videos, guides and workbooks downloads for direct work with children and families

Home » Social Work Supervision and Reflection Tools & Resources

Social Work Supervision and Reflection Tools & Resources

Table of Contents

Exploring Identity, Power, Values and Ethics

• Social GGRRAAAACCEEESSSS

This tool provides a framework called Social GGRRAAAACCEEESSSS for reflecting on different aspects of personal identity as a person and as an enabler of supervision. It includes questions to consider how one’s identity might be described by others, what aspects are visible/invisible and voiced/unvoiced, and how identity might impact supervision relationships. The reflection aims to increase self-awareness about identity and its potential impact on supervision.

• Social GGRRAAAACCEEESSSS in practice 

The resource provides a compilation of case studies that demonstrate the application of the Social GGRRAAAACCEEESSSS tool in various social work contexts. It delves into the nuances of identity reflection in supervision, offers insights for student social workers, and presents an examination of a family’s challenges upon immigrating to a new country. Each case study serves as a practical guide for social workers, highlighting the importance of understanding multi-dimensional identities for effective and empathetic interventions.

• Identity exercise

This tool builds on the identity reflection in Tool 1 and prompts thinking about any implications of one’s identity to share with two groups: a community of practice, and one’s own local authority. It asks supervisors to consider if their self-reflection on identity has any relevance to share after becoming more self-aware. Sharing implications with groups can further learning about how identity shapes supervision relationships and practice.

• Privilege exercise

This tool uses a video and reflective discussion to explore personal experiences of privilege and disadvantage. It prompts supervisors to share examples in pairs of when they’ve faced related dilemmas or challenges in supervision. After this paired discussion, supervisors individually reflect on what they’ve learned from those challenges to build understanding of how privilege and disadvantage shape supervision relationships and practice.

• Privilege and cultural sensitivity case study exercise and reflection example

This is a case study exercise and reflection example aimed at helping social work students develop cultural competence and analyze privilege when working with minority families in the child protection system. It provides a scenario of conducting an assessment with an asylum-seeking family and prompts students to reflect on privilege, cultural sensitivity, language barriers, trust-building, intersectional vulnerabilities, assessing needs, and collaboration. The reflection example models how to thoughtfully analyze one’s positionality and approach the case with empathy, openness, and empowerment.

• Effective use of power and authority

This supervision styles exercise allows practice supervisors to reflect on their use of power and authority through role play with peer feedback. In groups of 3 or 4, supervisors take turns being a supervisee, supervisor, and observer(s) in a mock supervision session. The supervisee reflects on their supervision style related to power and authority, the supervisor helps the supervisee reflect, and the observer(s) provide feedback. Supervisors make notes for personal reflection on developing effective use of power based on the peer discussions.

• Anti-oppressive practice

This anti-oppressive practice tool provides a framework to reflect on the personal, cultural, and structural barriers faced by people you work with. It includes prompts to consider the impacts of these barriers on the individual and your relationship with them. The reflection aims to increase understanding of oppression experienced and determine your role in combatting barriers through empowerment and anti-oppressive supervision.

• Ethics and values discussion

This reflective questioning tool guides supervisors through Kolb’s learning cycle to critically analyze an ethical dilemma, including describing the situation, reflecting on experiences and beliefs, analyzing perspectives, and planning action. It can be used in supervision to explore dilemmas, supporting wellbeing through discussion and generating insights to improve practice. This tool is intended for use in conjunction with an available podcast.

Enhancing Reflection 

• Individual reflection – My strengths in relationship-based practice supervision

This individual reflection tool provides open-ended prompts for supervisors to identify and articulate their strengths in relationship-based practice supervision. By completing the statements, supervisors can build awareness of what they excel at, accomplishments they are proud of, and ways they have helped their organization. The reflection aims to boost self-confidence and recognize one’s capabilities as a practice supervisor.

• Reflective cycle

This tool is a structured method for critical reflection, aiding in effective decision-making during supervision. Based on Kolb’s (1984) four stages of reflection, this tool guides users through a series of questions across stages like experience, reflection, analysis, and planning, aiming to clarify actions and extract learning from experiences. It’s beneficial for individual or group supervision, especially in complex situations, as it fosters understanding, insights, and actionable plans.

• Group reflection

This group reflection tool called Systemic Reflective Space creates a structured process for one member to present a practice issue, while others listen and explore perspectives, followed by the presenter responding to the discussion and joint reflection. The aim is to build collaborative practice, offer alternative views to gain insights, and utilize the strengths and diversity of the group to transform practice through critical reflection.

• Effective group supervision

This group supervision planning tool provides a checklist of key considerations like purpose, membership, activities, authority and evaluation to optimize the effectiveness of group supervision sessions. Going through the prompts can help supervisors thoroughly prepare for productive group discussions that enhance practice, explore common themes, integrate theory, build skills, and achieve intended outcomes. The tool can also be used to review existing group supervision.

• Levels of reflection

This reflection tool outlines four levels of reflection from technical to process, providing descriptions and prompts to identify when each level is used and appropriate. Recognizing the depth of reflection supports supervisors in deliberately employing deeper critical analysis as needed to build professional capability, promote reflexivity, and manage emotions and unconscious biases influencing practice. The tool can develop self-awareness of reflection levels used and skill in accessing deeper reflection.

• Wonnacott’s Discrepancy Matrix

This critical thinking tool helps practitioners categorize case information as evidence, ambiguous, assumption, or missing to examine gaps and biases influencing decisions. By sorting information and reflecting on changes in knowledge, remaining questions, impacts, and next steps, supervisors can support workers in analyzing uncertainties and moving from assumptions to evidence-based practice. The tool builds capability for information-seeking, managing ambiguity, and wise judgment.

• Using law, theory and research in a reflective discussion

This reflective discussion tool incorporates law, theory, and research into questions mapped to Kolb’s learning cycle when exploring a practice situation. Preparing relevant law, theory, and research and comparing experiences to this knowledge base facilitates critical analysis of impacts, causes, meanings, and responses. The integration of outside learning prompts insights to inform next steps while identifying remaining knowledge gaps to build practice skills.

• Critical Incident Analysis

This critical incident analysis tool provides a framework to reflect on and learn from a significant practice event through describing the incident, analyzing initial responses, identifying issues and dilemmas, considering impacts and outcomes, and determining future learning needs. Mapping key aspects of the incident facilitates in-depth reflection to gain self-awareness, integrate theory, and transform thinking, feeling, and actions to improve practice. The structured analysis can be used individually or in supervision.

• Risk influences

This risk influences reflection tool identifies common biases like repetition, adjustment, relationship concerns, availability, and prejudice that shape risk perceptions. Prompting practitioners to consider how each factor affects their thinking about a specific situation increases self-awareness of subjective influences on risk judgments. Recognizing biases can lead to more objective analysis by overcoming habitual reactions in order to make sound risk assessments.

• Importance of reflective practice and reflective supervision to honor and support children’s relationship with their caregivers

This tool, “The Story of the O’s” by Piplo Productions, is an illustrated narrative aimed at practitioners in family support, emphasising the significance of reflective practice and supervision. Through storytelling, it encourages professionals to consider how they nurture and respect children’s connections with their caregivers. This resource serves as a valuable tool for promoting thoughtful and effective interventions in supporting healthy family dynamics.

Building Resilience

• The SPARK tool

The SPARK tool is a self-reflective evaluation tool for professionals to develop a tailored self-care plan. It uses prompts across different life domains to help professionals assess areas for improvement and build resilience. The tool encourages self-compassion and emphasizes that self-care is an ongoing process.

• Secondary trauma and compassion fatigue: a guide to support managers and practitioners

The guide explains the emotional toll professionals can face when helping others. It looks at how this affects individuals personally, professionally, and the bigger organization. The guide also gives tips on reducing these negative effects and offers extra resources for learning.

• Resilience skills

This resilience skills tool identifies 7 learnable capabilities like emotional regulation, causal analysis, and empathy that support bouncing back from adversity. Practitioners rate their current skill level in each area and reflect on behaviors, strategies, supports, and blocks related to applying the skills. The structured analysis of resilience factors provides insights on developing abilities to constructively respond to challenges and build professional capability.

• Seven learnable skills of resilience

This resilience skills tool allows practitioners to rate their abilities in 7 areas like emotional regulation, analyze supports and blocks, and develop action plans to build skills. Completing the structured reflection individually then reviewing in supervision provides insights to improve resilience. Setting goals, planning steps with support, and tracking progress grows capabilities to handle adversity and boosts wellbeing.

• Self-help audit plan

This self-care audit and planning tool guides reflection on work experiences, life circumstances, coping strategies, and sources of stress and comfort to identify needed self-care strategies. Practitioners develop an individualized plan for the short and long term to prioritize activities, people, and changes that promote wellbeing and resilience. Completing the audit and setting intentional goals for self-care enables supervisees to mitigate negative impacts of their role and sustain effectiveness.

• Emotional resilience postcards

These emotional resilience postcards outline positive strategies like planning ahead, reframing problems, exercising, seeking support, and mood modification that can help cope with work stressors. In supervision, supervisors can guide supervisees to identify demands, reflect on current coping methods, and consider adopting new research-based approaches. Having postcards to refer to builds capability to manage emotions and sustain wellbeing while handling challenging situations.

This debriefing tool provides a structured approach to discuss the emotional impact of a specific work encounter, adapting the Schwartz Rounds model. In a safe supervision setting, a practitioner shares their story and feelings without problem-solving, followed by joint reflection on the experience of sharing. Acknowledging emotions and reactions to build self-awareness supports resilience and wellbeing, though further organisational support may be needed.

• Supervision in times of change

This change management tool uses a dartboard to categorize aspects of a change situation as within control, influenceable, or outside control. In supervision or team discussions, it prompts reflection on impacts, reasons, and potential responses to take control of what’s possible and influence where beneficial. Identifying spheres of control/influence provides focus for constructive action to manage oneself and help shape change.

• Managers’ Audit Tool

The Managers’ Audit Tool is a table that allows managers to rate themselves on various management competencies like managing workload, teamwork, process planning, communication, and providing feedback. The table has descriptions of best practices for each competency, and managers rate themselves on a 0-2 scale on how often they demonstrate those practices. The table also has a column for managers to describe improvements and actions needed in each competency area.

• Four strategies for reducing stress and building resilience

The Four Strategies for Reducing Stress and Building Resilience tool outlines 4 key strategies – Focus, Diffuse, Distract, and Relax – and provides examples of specific people, tools, and techniques in each category that can help reduce stress levels. The tool recommends creating a personalized list under each strategy with resources and methods to call on when feeling overwhelmed or needing to re-center. Using these four evidence-based strategies together can help build resilience and manage stress.

• Three top tips for containing Covid-19 anxiety

The Top Tips for Containing Infectious Anxiety tool provides 3 strategies to help contain anxiety during uncertain times – using the CPR acronym to calm thoughts, pause for breath, and relax muscles; getting in touch with calm by noticing how it feels and spreading it; and taking things one day at a time rather than worrying about the distant future. Practicing these tips can help individuals and teams manage anxiety and foster resilience.

• The SUMO (stop, understand, move on) tool 

The SUMO (Stop, Understand, Move On) tool is a simple 7 question framework to help individuals and teams reflect on their stress and anxiety levels during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic – Immediate Response, Repair, and Recovery. Asking the 7 questions over time can guide the transition to lower anxiety and a new normal, as people Stop, Understand their anxiety, and Move On from crisis to stability. The tool provides a structure for processing trauma and building resilience.

Collecting Feedback

• Adults and Carers feedback

The Adults and Carers Feedback tool provides a framework for gathering feedback from service users and using it to improve practice through supervision discussions. It includes questions to guide the process of obtaining feedback, sharing it in supervision, identifying practice improvements, informing the organization of changes needed, and closing the loop by communicating back to service users. Using feedback in this structured way enables continuous learning and service improvement.

• Bridging interview

The Bridging Interview tool provides a structured approach for supervisors to practice giving critical feedback. Individuals think of a real situation requiring critical feedback, write an opening statement for the next supervision session, and share it with a small group. Group members listen to each statement, provide feedback on its clarity and impact, and suggest any improvements. Going through this exercise helps supervisors prepare for challenging conversations and deliver constructive criticism effectively.

• Giving feedback on supervision

The Giving Feedback on Supervision tool provides guidance on how to give constructive feedback within the supervisory relationship in order to improve supervision. It outlines principles and qualities of good feedback such as being clear, owned, regular, balanced, and specific. The tool includes sample frameworks for gathering evidence, identifying gaps between expectations and reality, having a discussion, and agreeing on changes, as well as tips for giving difficult feedback.

• Practice observation

The Practice Observation tool supports directly observing a social worker’s practice and reflecting on it in supervision to aid development. It includes sections for a pre-observation discussion, post-observation reflection questions for both parties, and a framework for providing feedback in supervision on what happened, how it felt, what it meant, strengths, areas for improvement, and an action plan. Practice observation followed by collaborative reflection strengthens skills and accountability.

• Supervision observation

The Supervision Observation tool supports directly observing a supervision session and then reflecting on it collaboratively. It includes pre-observation discussion, post-observation reflection questions, feedback on strengths and improvements, and an action plan. With consent, anonymized organizational learning can also be extracted to evaluate supervision’s impact.

Developing Practice

• Appreciative inquiry

The Appreciative Inquiry tool guides supervisors in identifying and analyzing good social work practice through a 4-step reflective discussion: Elicit a proud example, Amplify details of what went well, Reflect on key learning, and Start over to elicit more insights. By repeatedly surfacing specifics of what enabled success, supervisors can reinforce excellent practice, extract transferable learning, and feed back organizational improvements. Appreciative inquiry builds on strengths.

The Coaching tool provides a 4-step GROW model for reflective discussions in supervision – establish the Goal, discuss Reality and influencing factors, generate Options for achieving the goal, and decide What action will be taken. By using coaching questions, the supervisor guides the supervisee to increase awareness and determine their own solutions. The tool includes a sample scenario for supervisors to practice applying the coaching methodology.

• Learning and development action plan

The Learning and Development Action Plan tool supports continuous improvement through supervision discussions. Individuals identify striking new knowledge, skills needing development, specific actions to take, support needed, how to measure progress, and timing. By completing the template, supervisees increase self-awareness, create goals, and collaborate with supervisors on their growth. The tool can also elicit organizational learning for improvement.

Conducting Audits

• Audit of supervision principles

The Audit of Supervision Principles tool enables assessment of how well supervision aligns with good practice principles. Individuals or groups rate supervision on a 1-5 scale for each principle, comment on evidence, and identify actions and timescales for improvement. Reflecting on principles in this structured way strengthens ethical, effective, person-centered supervision and also elicits organizational learning.

• Reflective supervision Audit Tool

The Reflective Supervision Audit Tool provides a framework for assessing the quality of supervision against 6 principles of good practice. Auditors gather evidence on each principle and determine whether supervision should be challenged, supported, maintained, or promoted. The tool elicits organizational learning and enables supervisors and supervisees to strengthen their supervision through collaborative audit and action planning.

• Supervision self-audit

The Supervision Self-Audit tool allows supervisors and supervisees to rate and comment on the quality, impact, and outcomes of their supervision on a 1-5 scale. Statements cover the supervisory relationship, environment, discussions, and effects on confidence, support, learning, organizational role, motivation, and clear actions. The collaborative feedback strengthens individuals and also elicits organizational learning about supervision.

• Supervision audit

The Supervision Audit Tool allows structured review of supervision records against evidence-based quality standards, with supervisors rating on a 1-5 scale for frequency, environment, reflective discussion, actions, learning, and more. Detailed comments capture qualitative evidence and prompt collaborative reflection between supervisor and supervisee on strengths, areas for improvement, and support needed. The process strengthens individual supervision and provides organizational learning.

• Fit with other activities

The Fit with Other Activities tool helps align supervision with complementary practices by identifying where key supervision functions like relationship-building, service user involvement, reflection, oversight, support, and learning also occur. Individuals, supervisors, or organizations can use the template to map connections, find gaps, and strengthen the supervision framework through better integration with related activities. A holistic practice system reinforces supervision’s impact.

• Supervision evaluation framework

The Supervision Evaluation Framework supports assessing supervision’s quantity, quality, and impact through key questions on amount provided, how well delivered, and the difference made to service users, staff, and organizations. Proposed methods like audits, observations, and feedback surveys evaluate if supervision policies are implemented, standards met, and intended outcomes achieved. Comprehensive evaluation enables continuous improvement at individual and organizational levels.

Strengthening the Supervisory Relationship

• Supervision relationship

The Supervision Relationship tool allows supervisors and supervisees to discuss and agree on how to build an effective relationship through considering key elements like safety, honesty, trust, values discussions, help-seeking, support and challenge. By outlining expectations and intentions, both parties take responsibility for co-creating a supervision experience that meets their needs. Clarifying the relationship dynamics promotes open and productive supervision.

• Person-centred approaches

The Person-Centered Approaches tool promotes tailoring supervision to individual needs through two exercises – Important To/For sorting identifies supervisee priorities and requirements, while One Page Profiles capture appreciated qualities, important elements, and ideal support. Sharing profiles enables supervisors and supervisees to understand each other better and co-create a collaborative relationship catering to unique people. A personalized approach makes supervision more meaningful.

• What works for me

The What Works for Me tool helps supervisees identify their ideal supervision setup through considering needs related to supervisor assigned, location, format, experience level, role complexity, setting, frequency, duration, key elements from the 4x4x4 model, and recording preferences. Completing the template enables supervisees to articulate what supervision structure and focus will best support their growth and performance. Tailoring supervision to the individual strengthens its impact.

• Building a good relationship

The Building a Good Relationship tool helps supervisors and supervisees strengthen their supervision relationship through identifying current strengths, discussing areas for improvement, mapping their internal models based on past experiences, and considering how to adjust behaviors. By surfacing influences on the relationship and intentions for change, both parties take responsibility for co-creating an authoritative yet trusting connection. An intentional approach develops a supervision relationship that meets mutual needs.

• Supervision agreement

The Supervision Agreement template captures mutual expectations and practical details to guide the supervisory relationship, including preparation, agenda, follow-up, scheduling, behaviors, handling difficulties confidentially, and preferences. Completing the agreement jointly clarifies roles and responsibilities, prevents issues, and aligns supervision with policy aims of promoting wellbeing and anti-oppressive practice. Agreements enable shared understanding of how to work effectively together.

• Supportive/ Directive

The Supportive/Directive tool uses a matrix to map different supervision approaches from highly directive to highly supportive, allowing supervisors and supervisees to assess the right balance of support and direction needed in different situations. Discussion in supervision about moving between directing, coaching, supporting and delegating modes builds supervisee capability and tailors the supervisor’s approach. Adjusting the support-direction mix over time develops practitioner independence.

Organisation and Recording

• Supervision policy outline

The Supervision Policy Outline provides key sections to include when developing or reviewing a supervision policy, covering the purpose, model, relationship expectations, practical details, confidentiality, preparation, recording, quality assurance, tools, and more. A comprehensive policy facilitates shared understanding and consistent practice aligned to organizational goals. Clear supervision policies support effective implementation.

• Supervision recording

The Supervision Recording tool provides guidance on planning, structuring, and documenting supervision aligned to the CLEAR model, covering preparation, agenda-setting, discussion areas like workload, cases, wellbeing, learning, relationships, and actions. It outlines ethical recording practices, shared ownership, required case notes, confidential storage, and use of supervision records for improvement. Clear recording protocols enable supervision to be consistently implemented and evaluated.

• Organisational Culture

The Organizational Culture tool helps assess how cultural elements like stories, behaviors, environment, roles, structure, and communication either support or hinder effective supervision values and practices. By mapping connections and gaps, groups can identify changes needed in areas such as stories, behaviors, environment, roles, structure, and communication to better align organizational and supervision cultures. Matching cultures reinforces supervision’s impact.

• Retaining staff

The Retaining Staff tool identifies organizational pull factors like making a difference and push factors like blame culture, and prompts discussion of how supervision can enhance positives and mitigate negatives to improve retention. Mapping links between known retention drivers and supervision allows teams to collaborate on maximizing ‘pull’ factors and minimizing ‘push’ factors through effective supervision. Supporting retention requires aligning supervision with wider organizational culture and practices.

• Workload considerations

The Workload Considerations tool prompts supervisors and supervisees to discuss workload management in supervision by exploring the supervisor’s knowledge of the supervisee’s capabilities and cases, case complexity factors, diary flexibility, and stress levels. Raising workload-related communication, planning, prioritization, and wellbeing needs enables more responsive oversight. Workload management requires understanding the worker and the work.

• Case prioritisation

The Case Prioritization tool helps supervisees and supervisors collaboratively rank and select the most complex, high-risk cases for in-depth discussion in supervision using factors like multi-agency involvement, risk likelihood and consequences, potential for change, and learning needs. Scoring cases from 1-5 guides prioritization of time to allow critical reflection on cases most requiring oversight. Focusing supervision discussions on priority cases enables better oversight within limited time.

Recommended Free Tools & Resources

Other Free Resources You Might Like

What’s the problem? A guide for parents of children and young people who have got in trouble online

The guide titled “What’s the Problem? A Guide for Parents of Children and Young People Who Have Got in Trouble Online” is a 32-page booklet addressing challenges parents may encounter…

Helping teenagers to cope with Domestic Abuse booklet

“Helping teenagers to cope with Domestic Abuse” booklet aims to provide support and guidance for teenagers and parents dealing with domestic abuse. The booklet covers the following key points: Understanding…

Gangs: Advice to parents and carers (booklet)

The “Gangs: Advice to Parents and Carers” booklet provides valuable guidance and information on addressing the issue of young people joining gangs. It aims to support parents and carers in…

Fluffy Finds a Safe Space: Story with Safety Planning Worksheets for Children Dealing with Parents Fighting

“Fluffy Finds a Safe Space: A Story with Safety Planning Worksheets for Children Dealing with Parents’ Fighting” provides a story, guide for professionals and worksheets to help children think about…

ASQ:SE-2 Social-Emotional Development Guide (Sheets for parents)

The ‘ASQ:SE-2 Social-Emotional Development Guide (Sheets for parents)’ is a visually engaging resource designed to assist parents and social workers in understanding and monitoring the social-emotional development of children aged…

Like us on Facebook

• _Everything
• Adoption & Fostering
• Assessment: Children
• Assessment: Parents
• Assessment: Wishes & Feelings
• Autism & ADHD
• Child's behaviour
• Children & Young people
• CSE, CCE & Sexual Abuse
• Disability & Health
• Domestic Abuse
• Domestic Abuse: Assessment
• Domestic Abuse: Children
• Domestic Abuse: Parents
• Drugs: Adults
• Drugs: Assessment Tools
• Drugs: Children & Teenagers
• Eating Problems & Body Image
• Grief & Loss
• Home safety
• Ilnesses & Disorders
• Imprisonment
• Individual work
• Learning Difficulties
• Mental Health
• Online Safety
• Parenting – Disability
• Parenting Guides
• Personal Safety
• Self-esteem
• Sexual abuse
• Sleep Problems
• Stimulation
• Wishes & Feelings

Copyright © 2024 Free Social Work Tools and Resources: SocialWorkersToolbox.com

We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us!

Internet Archive Audio

• This Just In
• Grateful Dead
• Old Time Radio
• 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
• Audio Books & Poetry
• Computers, Technology and Science
• Music, Arts & Culture
• News & Public Affairs
• Spirituality & Religion
• Radio News Archive

• Flickr Commons
• Occupy Wall Street Flickr
• NASA Images
• Solar System Collection
• Ames Research Center

• All Software
• Old School Emulation
• MS-DOS Games
• Historical Software
• Classic PC Games
• Software Library
• Kodi Archive and Support File
• Vintage Software
• CD-ROM Software
• CD-ROM Software Library
• Software Sites
• Tucows Software Library
• Shareware CD-ROMs
• Software Capsules Compilation
• CD-ROM Images
• ZX Spectrum
• DOOM Level CD

• Smithsonian Libraries
• FEDLINK (US)
• Lincoln Collection
• American Libraries
• Canadian Libraries
• Universal Library
• Project Gutenberg
• Children's Library
• Biodiversity Heritage Library
• Books by Language
• Additional Collections

• Prelinger Archives
• Democracy Now!
• Occupy Wall Street
• TV NSA Clip Library
• Animation & Cartoons
• Arts & Music
• Computers & Technology
• Cultural & Academic Films
• Ephemeral Films
• Sports Videos
• Videogame Videos
• Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

• Wayback Machine (iOS)
• Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

• Explore the Collections
• Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

• Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

Critical thinking for social workers : exercises for the helping professions

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

• Graphic Violence
• Explicit Sexual Content
• Hate Speech
• Misinformation/Disinformation
• Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
• Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

77 Previews

Better World Books

DOWNLOAD OPTIONS

No suitable files to display here.

EPUB and PDF access not available for this item.

IN COLLECTIONS

Uploaded by AngelaC-loader on October 26, 2010

A Crash Course in Critical Thinking

What you need to know—and read—about one of the essential skills needed today..

Posted April 8, 2024 | Reviewed by Michelle Quirk

• In research for "A More Beautiful Question," I did a deep dive into the current crisis in critical thinking.
• Many people may think of themselves as critical thinkers, but they actually are not.
• Here is a series of questions you can ask yourself to try to ensure that you are thinking critically.

Conspiracy theories. Inability to distinguish facts from falsehoods. Widespread confusion about who and what to believe.

These are some of the hallmarks of the current crisis in critical thinking—which just might be the issue of our times. Because if people aren’t willing or able to think critically as they choose potential leaders, they’re apt to choose bad ones. And if they can’t judge whether the information they’re receiving is sound, they may follow faulty advice while ignoring recommendations that are science-based and solid (and perhaps life-saving).

Moreover, as a society, if we can’t think critically about the many serious challenges we face, it becomes more difficult to agree on what those challenges are—much less solve them.

On a personal level, critical thinking can enable you to make better everyday decisions. It can help you make sense of an increasingly complex and confusing world.

In the new expanded edition of my book A More Beautiful Question ( AMBQ ), I took a deep dive into critical thinking. Here are a few key things I learned.

First off, before you can get better at critical thinking, you should understand what it is. It’s not just about being a skeptic. When thinking critically, we are thoughtfully reasoning, evaluating, and making decisions based on evidence and logic. And—perhaps most important—while doing this, a critical thinker always strives to be open-minded and fair-minded . That’s not easy: It demands that you constantly question your assumptions and biases and that you always remain open to considering opposing views.

In today’s polarized environment, many people think of themselves as critical thinkers simply because they ask skeptical questions—often directed at, say, certain government policies or ideas espoused by those on the “other side” of the political divide. The problem is, they may not be asking these questions with an open mind or a willingness to fairly consider opposing views.

When people do this, they’re engaging in “weak-sense critical thinking”—a term popularized by the late Richard Paul, a co-founder of The Foundation for Critical Thinking . “Weak-sense critical thinking” means applying the tools and practices of critical thinking—questioning, investigating, evaluating—but with the sole purpose of confirming one’s own bias or serving an agenda.

In AMBQ , I lay out a series of questions you can ask yourself to try to ensure that you’re thinking critically. Here are some of the questions to consider:

• Why do I believe what I believe?
• Are my views based on evidence?
• Have I fairly and thoughtfully considered differing viewpoints?
• Am I truly open to changing my mind?

Of course, becoming a better critical thinker is not as simple as just asking yourself a few questions. Critical thinking is a habit of mind that must be developed and strengthened over time. In effect, you must train yourself to think in a manner that is more effortful, aware, grounded, and balanced.

For those interested in giving themselves a crash course in critical thinking—something I did myself, as I was working on my book—I thought it might be helpful to share a list of some of the books that have shaped my own thinking on this subject. As a self-interested author, I naturally would suggest that you start with the new 10th-anniversary edition of A More Beautiful Question , but beyond that, here are the top eight critical-thinking books I’d recommend.

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark , by Carl Sagan

This book simply must top the list, because the late scientist and author Carl Sagan continues to be such a bright shining light in the critical thinking universe. Chapter 12 includes the details on Sagan’s famous “baloney detection kit,” a collection of lessons and tips on how to deal with bogus arguments and logical fallacies.

Clear Thinking: Turning Ordinary Moments Into Extraordinary Results , by Shane Parrish

The creator of the Farnham Street website and host of the “Knowledge Project” podcast explains how to contend with biases and unconscious reactions so you can make better everyday decisions. It contains insights from many of the brilliant thinkers Shane has studied.

Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World , by David Robert Grimes

A brilliant, comprehensive 2021 book on critical thinking that, to my mind, hasn’t received nearly enough attention . The scientist Grimes dissects bad thinking, shows why it persists, and offers the tools to defeat it.

Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know , by Adam Grant

Intellectual humility—being willing to admit that you might be wrong—is what this book is primarily about. But Adam, the renowned Wharton psychology professor and bestselling author, takes the reader on a mind-opening journey with colorful stories and characters.

Think Like a Detective: A Kid's Guide to Critical Thinking , by David Pakman

The popular YouTuber and podcast host Pakman—normally known for talking politics —has written a terrific primer on critical thinking for children. The illustrated book presents critical thinking as a “superpower” that enables kids to unlock mysteries and dig for truth. (I also recommend Pakman’s second kids’ book called Think Like a Scientist .)

Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters , by Steven Pinker

The Harvard psychology professor Pinker tackles conspiracy theories head-on but also explores concepts involving risk/reward, probability and randomness, and correlation/causation. And if that strikes you as daunting, be assured that Pinker makes it lively and accessible.

How Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion and Persuasion , by David McRaney

David is a science writer who hosts the popular podcast “You Are Not So Smart” (and his ideas are featured in A More Beautiful Question ). His well-written book looks at ways you can actually get through to people who see the world very differently than you (hint: bludgeoning them with facts definitely won’t work).

A Healthy Democracy's Best Hope: Building the Critical Thinking Habit , by M Neil Browne and Chelsea Kulhanek

Neil Browne, author of the seminal Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, has been a pioneer in presenting critical thinking as a question-based approach to making sense of the world around us. His newest book, co-authored with Chelsea Kulhanek, breaks down critical thinking into “11 explosive questions”—including the “priors question” (which challenges us to question assumptions), the “evidence question” (focusing on how to evaluate and weigh evidence), and the “humility question” (which reminds us that a critical thinker must be humble enough to consider the possibility of being wrong).

Warren Berger is a longtime journalist and author of A More Beautiful Question .

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Support Group
• International
• New Zealand
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Coronavirus Disease 2019
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience