death penalty essay ielts

Free IELTS lessons signup

• Academic practice
• General practice
• Task 1 Academic
• Task 1 General
• Task 2 (essay)

IELTS band 9 essay: death penalty

Here you can find advice how to structure IELTS essay and IELTS model answer for death penalty topic. Question type: advantages and disadvantages .

Here is the question card:

Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.

Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion.

So this is the advantage/disadvantage essay. In this essay you're asked about :

• Advantages of capital punishment
• Disadvantages of capital punishment
• Your opinion about it

Before writing this IELTS essay, you should decide what’s your opinion and then choose your arguments to describe pros and cons of death penalty. You don’t have to make up very complicate ideas. Even simple, but well-written arguments can often give you a band 9 for writing .

Some of the possible arguments :

• Disadvantages of capital punishment :
• we have no rights to kill other humans
• innocent people can be killed because of unfair sentences
• even criminals deserve a second chance
• Advantages of capital punishment :
• it prevents major crimes
• it restores equilibrium of justice
• it lessens expenses on maintenance of prisoners

How to structure my answer?

Surely, there are a lot of ways to organise this essay. But here is one possible way of structuring the answer to produce a band 9 essay :

Introduction : rephrase the topic and state your opinion.

Body paragraphs :

• paragraph 1: disadvantages of death penalty
• paragraph 2: advantages of death penalty

Conclusion : sum up the ideas from body paragraphs and briefly give your opinion.

Band 9 essay sample (death penalty)

Many people believe that death penalty is necessary to keep security system efficient in the society. While there are some negative aspects of capital punishment, I agree with the view that without it we will become more vulnerable to violence.

Death penalty can be considered unsuitable punishment for several reasons. The strongest argument is that we have no rights to kill other humans. Right to live is the basic right of any human being, and no one can infringe this right, irrespective of the person’s deeds. Moreover, innocent people can face wrongful execution. Such unfair sentences take away lives of innocent people and make other citizens lose faith in law and justice. And besides, sometimes criminals repent of their acts. In this case they should be given a second chance to improve themselves.

However, I believe that capital punishment is necessary in the society. Firstly, it is an effective deterrent of major crimes. The best method to prevent a person from committing crime is to show the consequences of his or her actions. For example, the government of Pakistan has controlled the rate of terrorism by enforcing death penalties for the members of terrorist organisations. Secondly, the governments spend large sums of national budget on maintenance of prisoners. Instead, this money can be used for the development of the society and welfare of the people.

To sum up, although capital punishment has some disadvantages, I think that it proves to be the best way of controlling criminals, lessening governmental expenses and preventing other people from doing crimes.

(257 words)

Useful vocabulary

capital punishment = death penalty

to commit a crime - to do a crime

deterrent of major crimes - something that prevents big crimes

to face wrongful execution - to be mistaken for a criminal and killed for that

to infringe someone’s right - restrict someone’s right, hurt someone’s interests

innocent people - people who are not guilty or responsible for crimes

to repent of something - to feel sorry for something

right to live is basic right of any human being

unfair sentence - not fair judgement

• Death Penalty

IELTS WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words about the following topic:

Some people argue that the death penalty should be abolished because it is inhumane and ineffective. Others believe it is necessary to deter crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample Answer, C1 English Level, Advanced, Band Score 6.5-7.5

• Paraphrase of the topic: The death penalty is a contentious issue, with some arguing for its abolition due to inhumanity and ineffectiveness, while others advocate for its necessity as a crime deterrent.
• Main opinion or idea: The death penalty should be abolished in favor of more humane and effective crime prevention and punishment methods.
• Support for the main opinion: The death penalty is considered inhumane and violates the right to life.
• Personal experience and knowledge: As someone who values the sanctity of human life, I find it challenging to support a system that takes away a person’s fundamental right to live.
• Support for the main opinion: The death penalty may not effectively deter crime.
• Personal experience and knowledge: While proponents argue it deters criminals, I believe focusing on rehabilitation and addressing root causes of crime can be more effective in reducing criminal behavior.
• Summary of body paragraphs: The death penalty debate revolves around its perceived inhumanity and effectiveness as a deterrent.
• Restate the main opinion: Abolishing the death penalty is the more just and compassionate approach, emphasizing humane crime prevention and punishment methods.
• Closing thought: Prioritizing rehabilitation, education, employment opportunities, and mental health support can contribute to building a more equitable and safer society.

The topic of the death penalty has long been a subject of intense debate, with some advocating for its abolition due to its perceived inhumanity and lack of efficacy, while others argue for its necessity as a crime deterrent. In this essay, I will explore both viewpoints and offer my opinion on the matter, drawing from personal experiences and knowledge.

Those in favor of abolishing the death penalty assert that it is a cruel and inhumane form of punishment that violates the right to life. Moreover, there is evidence to suggest that the death penalty does not serve as an effective deterrent against crime. As someone who believes in the sanctity of human life, I find it difficult to support a system that takes away the very essence of what it means to be human.

On the other hand, proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a necessary deterrent, preventing potential criminals from committing heinous acts out of fear of the ultimate consequence. They believe that the fear of facing the death penalty can dissuade individuals from engaging in violent and severe crimes. While I understand the intention behind this viewpoint, I believe that the death penalty fails to address the root causes of crime and does not effectively reduce criminal behavior.

In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished in favor of more humane and effective methods of punishment and crime prevention. Instead of focusing on punishment alone, society should invest in rehabilitation and social programs that address the underlying factors that lead individuals to commit crimes. Additionally, promoting education, employment opportunities, and mental health support can play a crucial role in reducing crime rates.

In conclusion, the debate over the death penalty is complex, with valid arguments on both sides. While some believe it is necessary for deterring crime, others argue for its abolition due to concerns of inhumanity and inefficacy. From my perspective, prioritizing humane and effective approaches to crime prevention and rehabilitation is essential for building a more just and compassionate society.

The death penalty has been a topic of debate, with some advocating for its abolition due to concerns of inhumanity and ineffectiveness, while others argue for its necessity as a deterrent against crime. In this essay, I will explore both viewpoints and offer my opinion based on personal experiences and knowledge.

Those in favor of abolishing the death penalty argue that it is a cruel and inhumane punishment that violates the right to life. Moreover, studies suggest that it may not serve as an effective deterrent to crime. As someone who values the sanctity of human life, I am inclined to agree with this perspective. The idea of taking a person’s life as a form of punishment raises moral and ethical concerns, and there is evidence to suggest that the death penalty does not necessarily prevent crime from occurring.

However, proponents of the death penalty believe that it acts as a necessary deterrent, preventing potential criminals from committing serious offenses due to fear of the ultimate consequence. While I understand the intention behind this viewpoint, I remain skeptical of its effectiveness as a crime deterrent. From my observations, crime rates do not necessarily decrease in regions with the death penalty, indicating that other factors play a significant role in crime prevention.

In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished in favor of more humane and effective crime prevention methods. Rather than focusing solely on punishment, societies should invest in addressing the root causes of crime through education, rehabilitation programs, and social support. A comprehensive approach that emphasizes rehabilitation and prevention can be more conducive to reducing crime rates and fostering a safer society.

In conclusion, the debate over the death penalty revolves around its perceived inhumanity and efficacy as a crime deterrent. While some argue for its abolition to uphold human rights, others advocate for its necessity to deter potential criminals. From my perspective, prioritizing humane crime prevention measures and rehabilitation is a more progressive and just approach to building a safer and more compassionate society.

The death penalty has long been a contentious topic, with some advocating for its abolition due to concerns of inhumanity and inefficacy, while others assert its necessity as a crime deterrent. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and offer my opinion based on personal experiences and knowledge.

Supporters of abolishing the death penalty argue that it is a cruel and inhumane form of punishment that violates the right to life. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that the death penalty does not effectively deter crime. As someone who values human rights and believes in the sanctity of life, I am inclined to agree with this viewpoint. The idea of taking a life as a means of retribution raises ethical dilemmas and does not necessarily address the root causes of criminal behavior.

On the other hand, proponents of the death penalty believe that it serves as a necessary deterrent, discouraging potential offenders from committing heinous crimes. While I understand the intention behind this perspective, I find it challenging to support a system that relies on fear rather than focusing on rehabilitation and crime prevention. From my observations, crime rates do not necessarily decrease in regions with the death penalty, indicating the need for more comprehensive approaches to addressing criminal behavior.

In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished in favor of alternative forms of punishment and crime prevention. Rather than focusing on retribution, societies should prioritize rehabilitation programs that aim to address the underlying causes of criminal activity. Furthermore, investing in education, social support systems, and mental health resources can contribute to reducing crime rates more effectively.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the death penalty centers on its perceived inhumanity and effectiveness as a crime deterrent. While some argue for its abolition to uphold human rights, others believe in its necessity to deter potential offenders. From my perspective, shifting the focus from punitive measures to comprehensive crime prevention strategies is essential for building a more just and compassionate society.

QUICK LINKS

Speaking Part 1 Speaking Part 2 Speaking Part 3 Reading Mini Test Academic Reading Full Practice Test General Reading Full Practice Test Writing Task 1 Writing Task 2 Ielts Listening Practice Test Ielts Listening Full Practice Test

Single Lesson Complete IELTS Program Essential IELTS Package Quick IELTS Course Book With Us

IELTS PRESS

About Ielts About Us Testimonials Privacy Policy

Social Media Directory

©2021. IELTS PRESS. All Rights Reserved.

IELTS is a registered trademark held by IELTS Partners, encompassing the British Council, IELTS Australia Pty Ltd, and the University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. These entities were not engaged in the creation of, and do not support, this website.

Single Lesson with Master Shane Complete IELTS Program Essential IELTS Package Quick IELTS Course Book With Us

• IELTS Scores
• Life Skills Test
• Find a Test Centre
• Alternatives to IELTS
• General Training
• Academic Word List
• Topic Vocabulary
• Collocation
• Phrasal Verbs
• Writing eBooks
• Reading eBook
• All eBooks & Courses

Life in Prison or the Death Penalty

by Viktoriia (Ukraine)

What should happen to him?

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to IELTS Essay Feedback Forum .

Capital Punishment

by Azam (Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan)

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? I thoroughly agree with the proposition, capital punishment should be made mandatory in our society, where crime ratio is being increased day by day because we live in a world where people are not even certain about how they are going to return, either on legs or on shoulders. There is a law of physics, which is known as "Murphy's Law", which states that "Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong". So whose duty is it to make it right again? To start with, the ratio of crime and terrorism is being so increased exponentially. People feel unsafe, even being at their own homes. Criminals show no compassion or mercy to those who are being held by them as captives. I do not know what they get by doing such heinous and diabolical acts. In my opinion, death penalty should be made as an essential punishment for those criminals and insurgents who love to annihilate the humanity or the society we live in, where people get massacred brutally just like flies in air. The good example of this is in most of middle-eastern countries where criminals get beheaded or hanged publicly for their wrongdoings, that is why their crime ratio is equivalent to almost zero. Crime is afterall a crime, irrespective of how big or small it is. By this i mean that, adopting such policy might frightens those criminals and make them to think at least ten times before bringing any kind of furor among citizen and annihilate them. On the other hand, many people or activists think that criminals are also humans so they also deserve another chance to rectify themselves to become a better citizen in future. From these facts, I would maintain that, no human-being happens to be an insurgent, criminal or terrorist by birth. It is just the time which plays as a best teacher for some and worst for some.

IELTS Capital Punishment Essay

Capital Punishment Essay

Please give some honest feedback. Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment in essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? With rising violence and ghost gun availability, normal people are more prone to danger now than ever. The whole judicial process consumes a lot of time and effort to punish the guilty. Furthermore, the lighter penalities fail to dither the culprit from repeating the crime placing the public in danger. I partially agree that capital punishment is needed to control violence and will try to explain the same below. Many criminals repeat their offending behavioural pattern as soon as they come out of the prison after serving the sentence as prison fails to bring any change in their basic nature. Plenty of criminals jailed in sexual assualt cases and robbery continue such behaviour once they are out again. Many racists and terrorists with extreme nature also follow the similar kind of pursuit. Also ghost guns without serial numbers and unexcepted attacks inspired from online videos mak it difficult to guard against vulnerable victims. capital punishment thus sounds good to deter offenders depending on the gravity of the situation as such people are too risky to be left out in to the society again. Nevertheless, awarding a death penalty to criminals cannot alone change their behaviour as observed in ISIS follwers who are prepared to die in their own attacks. Thus, death sentence cannot be a solution that reduces the crimes and secures public. Also, it assumes that perpetrators can never change rejecting the basic notion behind the punishment and legal process. Death is too severe and cannot be reversed in terms of penalty. Thus, capital punishment fails to address the cause of concern in reducing the crime rate but it is imperative in few cases of extremely grave crimes. Just like how one shoe doesn't fit every foot, one punishment cannot address all the uprising violence in the society alone. It surely does apply to few scenarios and some other measures are to be taken to address the elephant in the room.

Click here to post comments

Death Penalty

by sadineni (Bangalore)

With Out Capital punishment (The death Penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Do you agree or disagree? Death is same for both good people and as well as bad people (criminals). Fear of death is the deepest and strongest fear in the humane race. Nobody raise hand aganist this point. But here the question is whether capital punishment is essential to controle violence in society? Can We use this fear of death to controle violence? Killing a person who was killed other person. How far it is correct? In Recent years, If we see some crimes. even death penality is not sufficient to punish the criminals of those crimes like Nirbhaya case in India, Terrorist attack on Taj hotel in India and famous attack on world trade towers. As i already mentioned inherited death will be there in all living creatures in this universe. We can user this fear of death to prevent crime in society by installing the fear in peoples mind by hanging the criminal in the crime like nirbhaya case in India. If some body ask the question, How far it is correct to kill a person with the name of punishment, then deffinetly my answer is "yes it is correct" Because we have to see the intention behind killing the person. A soldier killing an enemy is not at all a crime but a person who was killed other person for the sake of money is deffinetly a crime. Similarly killing a person who was killed other person is to prevent the crime and to make justice to the victim. Capital punishment is not a new concept to us, It is there from our ancient times. So i can conclude my argument as capital punishment is essential to controle violance in society along with efforts to chnage the idiology and way of thinking of criminals .There should be strong system not to misuse the capital punishment,other wise it may cause furthermore violence in society instead of decrease violence in society.

Death Penalty Essay

Some people advocate the death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty and give your opinion. It's always said that "forgiving and making people learn from the mistakes is the best solution".The death penalty is something that is given to the people who committed an absolute brutal or cruel crime. As it is known that every coin has two different sides and every aspect or decision has both advantages and disadvantages. In detail, the death penalty when given to the criminals the authorities hang them or kill them on a decided date. The death penalty brings fear in the people who think of attempting a crime and people will never have the audacity to commit a crime. Which results in clearance of the negatives in the society and keeping it safe. In other words, the death penalty brings awareness to people who commit an offense and force them to choose the right path. On the contrary, this causes a loss of human life and great grief to their friends and family. An innocent person may lose their due to this punishment. For an instance, many criminals these days use innocent people as a part of their crime, and later these people are caught instead of the original criminals. If these people are given the death penalty this results in taking away an innocents life. Also, this may lead to a revolt by the public on authorities. Moreover. killing someone is never a favorable solution, Teaching them the way of life and how to exceptionally use their ideas for a better living would be much more satisfactory and ideal. A punishment should teach someone how to go on the right way by following the rules and regulations, but should never kill someone. Therefore, I support the idea that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society. Authorities should try to avoid death penalties to the maxing extent and should promote the ideology of changing the criminal's mindsets and thoughts and make them a better human being.

Before you go...

Check out the ielts buddy band 7+ ebooks & courses.

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

• Click on the HTML link code below.
• Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

• All Lessons
• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links

Recent Articles

Useful Language for IELTS Graphs

May 16, 24 04:44 AM

Taking a Gap Year

May 14, 24 03:00 PM

IELTS Essay: Loving Wildlife and Nature

May 10, 24 02:36 AM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening   IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

Copyright © 2022- IELTSbuddy All Rights Reserved

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.

IELTS Writing Task 2 essay sample 3118 – Band 6.0

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Policies and Government , Society and Community , Task 2 essay , Writing samples , Writing topics

The writing sample displayed here is the work of IELTS candidates and has been assessed by our team for guidance and practice purposes. These scores are not official IELTS scores.

Candidate’s Response:

While it is believed by some people that death penalty is advisable for hardened criminals, others consider that the capital punishment should be banned. In my opinion, death penalty should be kept as a red line for those who involved in committing serious offending but it is essential to consider carefully before providing a final verdict.

There is little room for doubt that any crime committed by anyone must be punished in order to prevent others from offending. By providing punishment, it will ensure that people would be more concerned before being involved in any dodgy circumstances or human rights law in certain cases. Therefore, people who offended serious law abuses, such as a murder, inconsequentially should be punished by receiving a capital punishment. Thus, it will help others understand their overall responsibilities and prevent them, especially first-year criminals, from offending.

On the other hand, there are some disadvantages of providing death penalty. Firstly, in some countries, specifically in low-income countries, with high level of corruption this type of punishment might be used in personal purposes. As usual, these countries are presided over by a handful of corrupted people who have the ability to manipulate any activity to their own benefit and punish people in order to frighten them. Secondly, there is a high probability to condemn an innocent person and commit a penalty. In such a case, capital punishment prohibition would help authorities and people to develop a clearer understanding of criminals’ intentions and find a real offender.

In conclusion, while capital punishment certainly helps people understand their responsibilities, there are some circumstances where this measure might lead to the state of turmoil within society.

Presented By: Shahab Hosseinzadeh

January 23, 2024

Assessor’s Comment

Thank you indeed for writing this essay. Your stance in favor of the death penalty is clearly stated. However, you mentioned that it should be kept as a "red line" and that careful consideration is essential, providing a nuanced perspective. While the essay touches on several key points, it should consider expanding on ideas for a more comprehensive analysis. Providing specific examples or evidence can enhance the persuasiveness of the essay's argument. Regarding sentence structure and clarity, some sentences are complex, and a few could be rephrased for better clarity. For instance, in the concluding sentence, consider clarifying what "state of turmoil" refers to. Although the vocabulary range is wide, there are some vocabulary issues. For instance, instead of "dodgy circumstances," the essay can use "illegal activities" for a more academic tone.

Kasra Sharifan

Ielts writing band descriptors:, video feedback.

IELTS Juice

IELTS Juice is brought to you by Juice Academy, registered in ‌British Columbia, Canada. On this channel, experienced English teachers and IELTS experts provide lessons, tips, and guidance to help you improve your English and achieve the best results in the IELTS exam.

The IELTS Assessor

Co-founder and CFO

British Council certi f ied English teacher, IDP-trained IELTS instructor , content writer, editor-in-chief, co-founder, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at IELTS Juice Online Academy.

The 6.0 sample upgraded to 7.0+

Read similar samples

IELTS Writing Task 2 essay sample 3056 – Band 5.5

Education , Task 2 essay , Writing samples , Writing topics

Some people say that in our modern age, it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

IELTS Writing Task 2 essay sample 2838 – Band 7.0

There are serious concerns about the sales and production of genetically modified food, yet this is necessary if we are to meet the demands of an increasing world population.

What is your opinion on this?

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Submit Comment

IELTS Listening

Best approaches to each part of the IELTS Listening test

IELTS Reading

All the strategies you need for success in IELTS reading

IELTS Writing

How to write letters, reports & essays based on IELTS criteria

IELTS Speaking

Top tips and speaking practice materials for the three parts

IELTS Essential Words

Absolutely essential words for the IELTS test

What’s IELTS

An introductory course providing an overview of the IELTS test and format.

One Word or Two

Focusing on words that may appear to be composed of two separate parts but are, in fact, written as a single word.

Username or Email Address

Remember Me

Some people advocate the death penalty for those who commit violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.

• The death penalty has been an effective tool to control extreme crime for thousands of years.
• It helps to comfort the victims, especially those who lost loved ones in brutal crimes.
• If no death penalty, it's hard to establish a fair and convinced law.
• No one can guarantee each death penalty is fair or proper. Any error on them will cause innocent life loss.
• Some people think death isn't a punishment, so the death penalty doesn't work on them. What they fear may be a life sentence.

• October 6, 2020
• No Comments

IELTS Writing task 2 band 5.5 essay | Capital punishment

Today, we will be looking at an opinion essay and giving it a rating from an examiner’s perspective. The essay in this IELTS task 2 rating would score 5.5 in the test.

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

You should write at least 250 words.

Before talking about the essential role of the death penalty,  you  have to think about the meaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment. If  you   consider that the purpose is to prevent the guilty from  being nasty again, you   can be seduced by an  argumentation  in favour of the suppression of capital punishment.

But  you  have to think about another aspect of the problem: a punishment is also useful to   impress  people, to make them fear the law. In fact,   let’s   take the example of a young  misfit ,  which   has grown in a violent atmosphere, influenced by older delinquents,  etc .  He lives  in   the streets;  he’s   got no aim but to survive. This is the kind of person who could possibly kill someone for money, or even for fun. Why would he fear prison? Life would be easier for him there . In addition, in many cases, when you behave normally, you can benefit from penalty reductions .  This young misfit needs to be  impressed ; he needs to know that the law is a frontier. When you cross it,  you  can lose your life. That is why capital punishment helps keep a distance between robbery and murder. If  you   abolish it,  you  suppress the difference between these two types of crime, which are completely different.

But there is also a limit to define: even if the death penalty is unavoidable, it would be a crime to apply it to inadequate cases. If there is no premeditation or past facts which can justify such a punishment, it is far too strict to apply the death penalty. That is why the lawmakers have to establish precisely the context in which capital punishment  car   being pronounced .   That is the price to pay to limit violence without using excessive violence .

The first thing you will notice about this essay is that there are only three paragraphs. The first paragraph does not read like an introduction but an unfinished body paragraph, it doesn’t clearly tell the reader what is going to be discussed in the essay. The last sentence mentions ‘the suppression of capital punishment ‘ but the next paragraph is about deterring criminals from committing crimes so there is no clear progression here. There is also a lack of cohesive devices, and on reading the full essay you will also notice that there is no conclusion, so the writer is not going to score higher than a 5 .  It may seem odd to start with coherence rather than task response, but inadequate paragraphing stands out immediately here, so it is easy to rate. Examiners would usually look at task response first.

• Presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of  overall progression
• Makes inadequate , inaccurate or overuse of cohesive devices
• May be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution  may not write in paragraphs, or paragraphing may be inadequate .

Task Response

The writer has not fully addressed the question for task response. The last sentence in the first paragraph is not clear at all and is a contradiction. If the purpose is to stop criminals reoffending or committing violent crime again it is not likely to be ‘supressed’ as the writer says. The second paragraph talks about deterring criminals and we can assume through that crimes of violence can be reduced. I have also underlined a sentence where the writer drifts off topic by talking about ‘penalty reductions’. In the last paragraph the writer talks about under which circumstances capital punishment should be given as a sentence which is not related to the question prompt. Also, the last sentence doesn’t really make any sense. The whole essay is poorly written, and it is difficult to come to any clear conclusions. An important point to note, the tone of the essay is inappropriate. The writer uses ‘you’ in the first two paragraphs as if speaking to someone. Writing task 2 is an academic essay and therefore requires a formal tone ie  Before discussing the essential role of the death penalty, the meaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment should be considered.

• addresses the task only partially ; the format may be inappropriate in places
• expresses a position but the development is not always clear and there may be no conclusions drawn
• presents some main ideas but these are limited and not s ufficiently developed ; there may be irrelevant detail

There are quite a few word-choice errors, the most obvious being ‘you’ as already discussed. In the first paragraph ‘being nasty again’ could be changed to  ‘reoffending ’.  In the second paragraph the writer uses ‘impress people’ and ‘needs to be impressed’. It would be more appropriate to use  ‘deter’  and  ‘deterred’  here ie  ‘deter people’  and  ‘needs to be deterred’ . ‘Living in the street’ should be  ‘living on the streets’ . You will also notice that when referencing the male pronoun ‘he’ is used. It would have been more appropriate to just say  ‘young person’  instead of ‘misfit’ and then use the plural pronoun  ‘they’  to include both male and female. In academic writing nowadays it is inappropriate to use language that excludes one of the sexes –  ‘sexist language’ . We often use  ‘people’  or  ‘person’  to include both male and female ie  Man is a social animal – People are social animals.  In the last sentence ‘car’ should obviously be ‘can’ and ‘be pronounced’ are errors –  ‘can be given or used’  would be better. Overall, the vocabulary is adequate for the task.

• Uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task
• Attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy
• Makes some errors in spelling a nd/or word formation, but they do not impede communication

There are some errors with contractions ‘let’s’ and ‘he’s’. In academic essays always use the full forms of words as we only use contractions in informal writing or speech. The use of ‘etc’ means the sentence in the second paragraph is incomplete. Avoid using ‘etc’ and ‘so on’.

The main causes of pollution are factory emissions, car exhaust emissions, discharge of waste into rivers etc.

We can change into the complete sentence below.

The main causes of pollution are factory emissions, car exhaust emissions, and discharge of waste into rivers.

There are quite a few simple sentences in the second paragraph, but punctuation is actually well controlled throughout the essay.

• Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms
• Makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication

That brings an end to this essay rating. If you are preparing for your IELTS test and want to find out a bit more about task 2, check out our post giving five tips to improve your IELTS writing task 2 ! Our candidate would have scored a 5 for coherence and task achievement, with grammar and vocabulary scoring 6 each, giving an overall score of 5.5. Is there anything that surprised you about this essay’s score? Have your say, and comment in the section below!  Click here for the full public IELTS task 2 writing descriptors .

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

More to explore

IELTS Writing Task 1 tips

Today we will have a brief look at writing task 1 and some important features to pay attention to when writing. The

IELTS Writing task 2 band 6.5 | Countries becoming more similar

This IELTS Writing task 2 would score band 6.5 in a test. It is about countries becoming more similar due to people buying similar products.

10 great IELTS listening tips

We give you some great IELTS listening tips to help take your listening to the next level. Read on for 10 great tips for your IELTS listening!

IELTS Speaking: How to learn vowel phonetics

In this post, IELTS Speaking: How to learn vowel phonetics, we look at the secret of learning how to pronounce vowels like a native speaker!

Are you taking the academic or General test?

Which task do you wish to complete.

Username or Email Address

Remember Me

Welcome Guest!

• IELTS Listening
• IELTS Reading
• IELTS Writing
• IELTS Writing Task 1
• IELTS Writing Task 2
• IELTS Speaking
• IELTS Speaking Part 1
• IELTS Speaking Part 2
• IELTS Speaking Part 3
• IELTS Practice Tests
• IELTS Listening Practice Tests
• IELTS Reading Practice Tests
• IELTS Writing Practice Tests
• IELTS Speaking Practice Tests
• All Courses
• IELTS Online Classes
• OET Online Classes
• PTE Online Classes
• CELPIP Online Classes
• Free Live Classes
• Australia PR
• Germany Job Seeker Visa
• Austria Job Seeker Visa
• Sweden Job Seeker Visa
• Study Abroad
• Student Testimonials
• Our Trainers
• IELTS Webinar
• Immigration Webinar

Some People Advocate Death Penalty for those Who Committed Violent Crimes- IELTS Writing Task 2

Updated On Feb 17, 2022

Share on Whatsapp

Share on Email

Share on Linkedin

Limited-Time Offer : Access a FREE 10-Day IELTS Study Plan!

Some people advocate the death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty and give your opinion.

Advantages/Disadvantages essay

Introduction

Paraphrase the topic of the essay and mention that capital punishment is the right approach to severe offenders.

Body paragraphs

Paragraph 1 – Talk about the advantages and exemplify them too.

Paragraph 2 – Implore the disadvantage of how the death penalty is wrong.

Restate your opinions.

Sample Essay

Many people have the perspective that people who commit heinous crimes should be given capital punishment. In contrast, others believe it is not the right approach to punish serious offenders. However, I agree that we will become more vulnerable to violence without it.

On the one hand, compensating the victim’s life with the criminals’ life is an “an-eye-for-an-eye” justice. Apart from that, the cost of imprisonment is avoided. The money which is used in accommodation and budget food can be spared when criminals are punished with state-sanctioned killing. This money could be wisely spent elsewhere, like for the development of the society and the welfare of the people. Furthermore, this way of retribution may create fear in the mind of the perpetrators and many criminalities can be avoided.

On the other hand, no one has the right to take away anyone’s precious life, even for justice. The survival right is the ultimate prerogative of humankind. Additionally, extenuating circumstances and miscarriage of justice should be considered that make people face execution while being wrongfully convicted. Such unfair confinement can take away the lives of innocent people and make other citizens lose faith in law and justice. The right to live is the fundamental right of any human being, and no one can infringe this right, irrespective of the person’s actions.

In conclusion, although the death penalty is an unusual and inhumane method of punishing severe criminals, it is also the best deterrent. Besides, it proves to be the best way of controlling criminals, lessening governmental expenses and preventing other people from committing crimes.

Meaning – (of a person or wrongful act, especially a crime) utterly odious or wicked. Example – He got caught red-handed in the most heinous of crimes but she saved him.

Meaning – exposed to the possibility of being attacked or harmed, either physically or emotionally. Example – Limited water for washing leaves people vulnerable to skin diseases like scabies.

Meaning – a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action. Example – The father of the 16-year-old kidnap victim appealed to her abductors to release her.

Meaning – refrain from killing, injuring, or distressing. Example – Hundreds of dogs and their owners were spared from bad encounters with rattlers.

• Prerogative

Meaning – a right or privilege exclusive to a particular individual or class. Example – Shades of yellow that included brown were the prerogative of the princes and princesses.

• Extenuating

Meaning – (of a factor or situation) serving to lessen the seriousness of an offence. Example – The two had a stimulating discussion about whether extenuating circumstances can ever justify murder.

Meaning – the carrying out of a sentence of death on a condemned person. Example – Jews faced execution by the Nazis during the First World War.

Meaning – breaking the terms of a law, agreement, etc.; violation. Example – If you infringe this particular law, it can lead to severe punishment.

• Confinement

Meaning – the action of confining or state of being confined. Example – Ken suggested that prisoners will be kept in solitary confinement.

Meaning – a thing that discourages or is intended to discourage someone from doing something Example – I have sympathy with anyone who has suffered a burglary, but I fail to see how any of these alarms had a deterrent effect.

• IELTS Essay Topics
• IELTS Sample essays
• IELTS Writing task 2 Tips
• Tips to Improve IELTS Writing Skills
• IELTS Writing recent actual test
• IELTS Writing Answer sheet

Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types

Start Preparing for IELTS: Get Your 10-Day Study Plan Today!

Janice Thompson

Soon after graduating with a Master’s in Literature from Southern Arkansas University, she joined an institute as an English language trainer. She has had innumerous student interactions and has produced a couple of research papers on English language teaching. She soon found that non-native speakers struggled to meet the English language requirements set by foreign universities. It was when she decided to jump ship into IELTS training. From then on, she has been mentoring IELTS aspirants. She joined IELTSMaterial about a year ago, and her contributions have been exceptional. Her essay ideas and vocabulary have taken many students to a band 9.

Explore other Advantage Disadvantage Essays

Raajdeep Saha

Kasturika Samanta

Nehasri Ravishenbagam

Post your Comments

Recent articles.

Our Offices

Gurgaon city scape, gurgaon bptp.

Step 1 of 3

Great going .

Get a free session from trainer

Have you taken test before?

Please select any option

Get free eBook to excel in test

Please enter Email ID

Get support from an Band 9 trainer

Please enter phone number

Already Registered?

Select a date

Please select a date

Select a time (IST Time Zone)

Please select a time

Mark Your Calendar: Free Session with Expert on

Which exam are you preparing?

Great Going!

• Writing Correction
• Online Prep Platform
• Online Course
• Speaking Assessment
• Ace The IELTS
• Target Band 7
• Practice Tests Downloads
• IELTS Success Formula
• Essays Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 samples – IELTS Band 9 essays
• Essays Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 8
• Essays Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 7
• Essays Band 6 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 6
• Essays Band 5 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 5
• Reports Band 9 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 9 (Academic Writing Task 1)
• Reports Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 8
• Reports Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 7
• Letters Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 1 – samples of IELTS letters of Band 9
• Letters Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS letters of Band 8
• Letters Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS letters of Band 7
• Speaking Samples
• Tests Samples
• 2023, 2024 IELTS questions
• 2022 IELTS questions
• 2021 IELTS questions
• 2020 IELTS questions
• High Scorer’s Advice IELTS high achievers share their secrets
• IELTS Results Competition
• IELTS-Blog App

IELTS Essay, topic: Capital punishment

• IELTS Essays - Band 7

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Those who are in favor of capital punishment mostly live in developing countries. However, this is not just an image of the Third World countries. Actually, the USA is one country where this kind of punishment has its rates of application. The state of Texas, in particular, is at the top, supporting this measure against crime, especially those involving serial killers and crimes against children. In a society dominated by fear and government control, it is foreseen that this penalty will continue .

Maybe this is not a simple question. As we can see there are several values here and of course cultural behavior. The roots of the question are religious, cultural, ethical and even geographical. The world is divided and the law systems show this division. The solutions, however can lead us to other questions concerning revenge and justice. better to kill a person because of his crimes? Can we admit that a life sentence could be a much better sentence? In fact, rehabilitation is the right way especially with an accurate psychological evaluation first. Some people are lost forever, and in my opinion some murderers and other criminals will suffer more in jail. In this sense, capital punishment is an easy way out.

This is a good essay, you should do well in the Task 2 Writing Test.

Related posts:

• IELTS essay, topic: Should school children be given homework (opinion)? This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: Having a salaried job is better than being self-employed (agree/disagree) This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: What is the best motivation for workers – salary, job satisfaction or helping others? This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: Is studying at university better than getting a job straight after school (opinion)? This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: Some people like to own their home while others prefer to rent it (discuss) This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...

2 thoughts on “IELTS Essay, topic: Capital punishment”

I don\’t think the essay answers the question. It is not clear whether the writer agrees or disagree with the prompt. Maybe I\’m missing something on the matter but don\’t you have to clearly state your stance in opinion/argument essays?

You are correct to notice that the writer’s position isn’t apparent throughout the entire essay, it is only expressed in the conclusion, and that is why this essay would get a 6 for task response. To get a 7 for TR the writer’s position has to be clear throughout the essay. This essay, however, would get an 8 for lexical resource and 7’s for coherence/cohesion and grammatical range, so that makes the total score a 7.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

IELTS Practice.Org

IELTS Practice Tests and Preparation Tips

• Band 9 IELTS Essays

There Seems To Be An Increasing Number Of Serious Crimes Being Committed Each Year

by Manjusha Nambiar · Published October 18, 2021 · Updated April 17, 2024

Sample essay

Over the years there has been a dramatic increase in the number of serious crimes being committed. While some people are of the opinion that capital punishment is the best way to tackle this problem, others disagree. In other opinion, other measures are required to reduce the crime rates. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail.

Capital punishment will certainly deter at least some people from committing heinous crimes. For example, a study in the US found that the rate of serious crimes in states that implement capital punishment is considerably lower than the crime rate in states that do not have capital punishment. This is clearly an indication that people are afraid of getting executed and that fear helps to reduce the crime rate.

However, capital punishment alone will not reduce the crime rates. If that was the case, then most countries should be free of serious crimes now because death penalty is still given in the majority of developed and developing countries. Therefore, the argument that other measures are also required to reduce crime certainly holds water.

One of the main reasons of increasing crime rates is the easy access to firearms. For example, many countries have liberal laws that allow almost everyone to own firearms. Crime rates are certainly high in countries like the United States in spite of the fact that they have an efficient penal system. If the US restricted the possession of guns, perhaps that alone would reduce the crime rates in that country. The government also needs to investigate the factors that compel people to commit crimes. In poor and developing nations poverty and unemployment are the main causes of increasing crime rates. If the government creates more jobs, the crime rate will automatically reduce.

In conclusion, there are several reasons behind increasing crime rates. Although some people insist that death penalty is the best way to tackle the problem, I agree with the argument that other measures are also required.

Need help with IELTS writing? Get your essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Tags: band 9 essay band 9 essay sample ielts band 9 essay ielts writing samples model band 9 ielts essays

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

• Next story  Most People Agree That Money Cannot Bring Happiness | Band 9 IELTS Essay Sample
• Previous story  Some People Think That Having A Retirement Age For Everybody Regardless Of Occupation Is Unfair
• Academic Writing Task 1
• Agree Or Disagree
• Band 7 essay samples
• Band 8 Essay Samples
• Band 8 letter samples
• Discuss Both Views
• Grammar exercises
• IELTS Writing
• Learn English
• OET Letters
• Sample Essays
• Sample Letters
• Writing Tips

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

IELTS Practice

April 21, 2024

The death penalty is still used as punishment for crimes in many places in the world, though there

The death penalty: ethical considerations, sample answer:.

The death penalty has been a controversial topic for centuries, with strong arguments on both sides of the debate. Proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, particularly in cases of heinous offenses such as murder. They believe that the ultimate punishment is necessary to ensure justice for the victims and their families. Additionally, some argue that certain individuals are beyond rehabilitation and pose a continued threat to society, making the death penalty the only viable option for protecting the public.

On the other hand, opponents of the death penalty argue that it is an inhumane and irreversible form of punishment. They point to the potential for wrongful convictions and the fact that the death penalty disproportionately affects marginalized and minority communities. Additionally, many argue that the death penalty does not effectively deter crime and that there are more humane and ethical alternatives, such as life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

In my opinion, the death penalty is never ethical. The potential for wrongful convictions and the irreversible nature of the punishment are too great of a risk. Furthermore, the death penalty does not address the root causes of crime and fails to provide true justice for the victims and their families. Instead, I believe that a focus on rehabilitation, restorative justice, and addressing systemic issues within the criminal justice system are more effective and ethical approaches to addressing crime and punishment.

Overall, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I firmly believe that the death penalty is an outdated and unethical practice that has no place in a modern and just society.

More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay

Be First to Comment

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

•   Tuesday, May 21, 2024

ieltstution

Let"s Crack IELTS

Essay 12: Is the Death Penalty Best Deterrent To Curb Crime?

There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed. Discuss both sides.

1 (death penalty vs. alternative measures: tackling serious crimes).

The rate of crime is increasing each year, creating a worrisome situation for governments. Although there are some people who consider the death penalty as the best solution to curb the spike in dangerous crimes, many view initiatives like the provision of job opportunities and education facilities as superior options.

On one hand, a section of society believes capital punishment to be the optimal solution for the eradication of crimes. They believe that life is precious to everyone, and fear of death would definitely deter people from committing serious crimes. They have sound evidence to provide through the example of countries like China and Iran that applied the severe punishment rule to crimes of serious nature and have observed a downtrend in crimes. Similarly, Saudi Arabia has witnessed negligible cases of murder and rape since the announcement of beheading criminals involved in such crimes. Thus, this group of people has a valid argument to support the death penalty.

On the other hand, it is propagated by many that the death sentence alone may not be sufficient for lowering the crime rate. This is because, firstly, people need to be given enough earning opportunities so that they do not have to look for illegal means to feed themselves. To illustrate, a recent survey by Daily Mail revealed that 60% of juvenile delinquents caught by police committed crimes just because they could not find jobs to earn a livelihood. Secondly, education for all can be instrumental in imparting awareness about the consequences of opting wrong means to make both ends meet. That is to say, those who are educated are less likely to get attracted to criminal activities due to the awareness of unpleasant consequences given to them by their teachers; hence, legally earn instead of indulging in crimes for making money.

To conclude, the death penalty is the best-considered solution by some to tackle dangerous criminal acts as it creates fear in potential criminals and bars them from doing heinous crimes; however, many suggested additional solutions to overcome the increasing rate of crimes, such as compulsory education and creation of jobs.

2 (The Death Penalty Debate: Effective Deterrent or Inhumane Punishment?)

In recent times, the issue of serious crimes has been a matter of great concern for societies across the globe. While some individuals argue that the death penalty serves as a potent deterrent to curb such heinous acts, others believe that alternative measures are needed to address the root causes of these crimes. This essay will explore both perspectives in detail before drawing a conclusion.

On one hand, proponents of the death penalty argue that it is the most effective way to deter individuals from committing serious crimes. They contend that the prospect of facing the ultimate punishment will make people think twice before engaging in activities that could result in such consequences. Furthermore, they argue that the death penalty sends a clear message to potential offenders that society will not tolerate such criminal behavior.

However, opponents of the death penalty argue that it is an ineffective and barbaric method of punishment. They argue that research has consistently shown that the death penalty does not serve as a deterrent. Moreover, they assert that the possibility of executing an innocent person is a significant risk that cannot be ignored. Instead of relying on the death penalty, they propose alternative measures, such as increased investment in education, social welfare, and mental health services, to address the underlying causes of serious crimes.

In conclusion, while the death penalty is seen by some as an effective deterrent against serious crimes, it is not a panacea for the issue. Instead, it is crucial to address the root causes of criminal behavior by investing in alternative measures. By providing individuals with education, social welfare, and mental health services, we can work to create a society where serious crimes are less likely to occur. Ultimately, it is only through a comprehensive approach that we can hope to make our communities safer and more secure.

3 (Curbing Serious Crimes: A Comprehensive Approach)

The rising incidence of serious crimes is a grave concern for societies worldwide. Some people believe that the death penalty is the most effective way to deter individuals from committing such heinous acts. On the other hand, many others argue that alternative measures are necessary to tackle the underlying causes of these crimes. This essay will examine both perspectives and provide a reasoned conclusion.

Those in favor of the death penalty argue that it serves as a powerful deterrent. They believe that the prospect of facing the ultimate punishment will instill fear in potential offenders and prevent them from committing serious crimes. Additionally, they argue that it acts as a form of retribution for the victims and their families, providing them with a sense of closure and justice.

However, opponents of the death penalty claim that it is an inhumane and ineffective method of punishment. They argue that studies have shown no conclusive evidence that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. Moreover, there is always the risk of executing an innocent person, which is a grave injustice. Furthermore, they argue that the underlying causes of serious crimes, such as poverty, social inequality, and lack of education, must be addressed through a comprehensive approach involving education, social welfare programs, and mental health services.

For instance, in countries where the death penalty is abolished, such as Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, the crime rates are relatively low. Instead of relying on the death penalty, these countries have invested in social welfare programs, education, and mental health services. As a result, their citizens are less likely to engage in criminal activities.

In conclusion, while the death penalty may seem like an effective deterrent, it is not a comprehensive solution to addressing the underlying causes of serious crimes. Instead, alternative measures, such as investing in education, social welfare, and mental health services, are necessary to create a society where such crimes are less likely to occur. Ultimately, it is only through a multi-faceted approach that we can hope to make our communities safer and more secure.

Did you like these sample responses? Read more here:

• Some people think that paying taxes is their only duty, while others believe that we have more responsibilities towards our society. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
• Some people say that to produce a happier society we must ensure that there is a small difference in earnings between the rich and the poor. To what extent do you agree?
• Some people believe that it is better to spend more money to eliminate the cause of crime, while others think that the government should spend more on punishment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Related Posts

Essay 49: combating crime by increasing police presence on the streets, essay 48: juvenile delinquency: why parental punishment isn’t justifiable, essay 47: is taking a gap year before university beneficial, essay 45: longer prison sentences for effective crime reduction.

IELTS General Training

A hub for IELTS GT test takers to help them reach their goal.

Essay 36 – Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society

Gt writing task 2 (essay writing) sample # 36.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

You should write at least 250 words.

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Model Answer 1: [Disagree]

The topic of capital punishment elicits strong emotions and diverse viewpoints, and some opine that without capital punishment, our society is prone to more crime and violence. I believe that there are more effective and humane ways to address crime and ensure public safety rather than implementing capital punishment.

Firstly, the claim that capital punishment deters crimes of violence is not strongly supported by empirical evidence. Numerous studies have shown that the presence or absence of the death penalty does not significantly affect crime rates. Factors such as socioeconomic conditions, education, and effective law enforcement play more substantial roles in preventing crime. Therefore, relying on capital punishment as a means to control violence may be misguided and overlook more comprehensive approaches to crime prevention.

Furthermore, the application of capital punishment raises ethical concerns. The irreversible nature of the death penalty means that any errors or miscarriages of justice cannot be rectified. There have been cases where innocent individuals have been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death, only to be exonerated years later. Such occurrences highlight the inherent fallibility of the justice system and the irreversible consequences of capital punishment.

Rather than relying on capital punishment, societies can focus on implementing more effective crime prevention measures and rehabilitation programmes. Investing in education, social support systems, and rehabilitation initiatives can address the root causes of criminal behaviour and help reintegrate individuals back into society. Moreover, a shift towards restorative justice approaches can offer a more compassionate and meaningful response to crime. Restorative justice focuses on repairing the harm caused by crime, promoting accountability, and facilitating the healing and reconciliation of all parties involved.

In conclusion, the evidence does not convincingly support the claim that the death penalty serves as an effective deterrent for crime. Moreover, ethical concerns, the potential for wrongful convictions, and the irreversibility of the punishment call into question its legitimacy. Instead, I believe that focusing on crime prevention, rehabilitation, and restorative justice can lead to more equitable, humane, and secure societies.

Model Answer 2: [Agree]

Many people believe that the death penalty is necessary for serious offenders to keep our society safe and for the country to function and advance. While such punishments might seem cruel and inhuman to some, I sincerely believe that without capital punishment, our society will become unsafe for ordinary citizens and vulnerable to brutality and crime.

To begin with, our society has laws and punishments so that ordinary citizens can live without fear and violent individuals are kept away from creating havoc. Thus when we talk about a burglar who has stolen more than once, we have a prison sentence for such crime and he is given an opportunity to repent and come clean after he serves the prison time. However, when we talk about a pathological criminal who is a serial killer or has an obsessive-compulsive disorder to rape a child, they are beyond correction and should never be allowed to be able to harm a single innocent soul on our watch. For such capital offences, we need to have capital punishment to make our society secure and safe.

Moreover, I believe that capital punishment is necessary as it is an effective deterrent to many major offences. According to many, the best method to keep crimes under a tolerable level is to show people the consequences of their misconduct and felonies. For example, many Asian countries, including Singapore, have controlled drug trafficking and drug dealing by enforcing death penalties for such offenders. The result of it was astounding and all of those countries have alleviated the drug trafficking and drug dealing problems to a staggering lower level.

To conclude, despite some sentiments against capital punishment, I believe that it proves out to be the best method to make our society a far better place to live in.

Model Answer 3: [Disagree]

Many people believe that the death sentence is necessary to counter the violence and maintain peace in society. However, I believe that there are better alternatives to curb the crime rates and the death penalty is inhumane in a civilised world.

According to many, the death sentence is the only way to make an example to deter others from committing heinous crimes. They believe that serious offenders are like worms in a righteous society and should not be given a second chance. However, for both ideas- in and against capital punishment, several research works have been conducted, and the findings indicate the contrary. It is interesting to note that countries that have implemented capital punishment still have a higher crime rate than those countries that have abolished it. Besides, I personally believe that we do not have the right to kill a human being as this would be another crime.

Thus it is only rational to suggest that counselling and educating criminals in prisons could be a great way to convert criminals into good human beings. Norway, where the crime rate is lower than most other countries in the world, is a great example of how proper counselling can change criminals. Moreover, we have to deal with the core factors of crimes and their backgrounds, give people economic freedom and tackle pressing issues in society to reduce crime rates. A society with a strong economy and educated members has lower crime rates and that is what we should be working on to achieve. Finally, we can replace capital punishment with life imprisonment for repeat offenders and heinous criminals who are beyond correction.

To conclude, persuaded by what has been discussed as well as compelled by what I have learnt and experienced, I would like to reiterate that capital punishment can not reduce the crime rate in the long run and it is inhumane to kill someone for his/her crime.

One Comment to “Essay 36 – Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society”

Thanks for sharing this useful content.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Overview

The death penalty is the best way to control and reduce serious crime. To what extent do you agree?

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

• Restatement of thesis
• Prediction or recommendation

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

• In conclusion
• To conclude
• To summarize
• In a nutshell

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ » — a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

• capital punishment
• deterrent effect
• sense of justice
• wrongful execution
• life imprisonment
• moral and ethical considerations
• rehabilitation
• financial and resource implications
• desensitize
• socio-economic biases
• racial biases
• retribution
• judicial system
• Check your IELTS essay »
• Find essays with the same topic
• View collections of IELTS Writing Samples
• Show IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

Some peole believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue, but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting culture. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school. in your letter, describe what you enjoyed about the course say how much cooking you've done since the course suggest another cookery course you'd like the school to offer, some countries, marriages are arranged by the parents but in other cases, people choose their own marriage partners. discuss both systems and state which you think is better., some people think that exercise is the key to health, while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. discuss both sides and give your opinion., marketing and promotion is the key to a successful business. to what extent do you agree.

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

• Skip to content
• Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

• IELTS Sample

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

Ielts writing task 2 sample 626 - capital punishment is essential to control violence and crime in society, ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay:, capital punishment is essential to control violence and crime in society. without enforcing capital punishment like dead sentence our life would become less secure and the number of crime and violence in society would increase..

IELTS Materials

• IELTS Bar Graph
• IELTS Line Graph
• IELTS Table Chart
• IELTS Flow Chart
• IELTS Pie Chart
• IELTS Letter Writing
• IELTS Essay
• Academic Reading

Useful Links

• IELTS Secrets
• Band Score Calculator
• Exam Specific Tips
• Useful Websites
• IELTS Preparation Tips
• Academic Reading Tips
• Academic Writing Tips
• GT Writing Tips
• Listening Tips
• Speaking Tips
• IELTS Grammar Review
• IELTS Vocabulary
• IELTS Cue Cards
• IELTS Life Skills
• Letter Types

• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Copyright Notice
• HTML Sitemap

IELTS Essays About Crime

Jump to: Opinion Essays , Discussion Essays , Discussion and Opinion Essays , or Situation Essays

Opinion Essays

The death penalty should be available as a punishment for serious crimes.

To what extent do you agree?

Certain groups of society believe that the most efficient way of lowering crime rates is to be able to implement the death penalty for crimes which are the most serious. Others believe that this is not the case and makes no difference. Personally, I am completely against the use of the death penalty and this essay shall explore some of the reasons for this view point.

Firstly, a major drawback of the death penalty is that it is irreversible and could be handed out incorrectly. Although forensic scientists are becoming more and more advanced there is still a chance that mistakes are made and innocent people are executed. A classic case of this was Colin Ross, who in 1922 was executed but later evidence proved that he was actually innocent and in fact he was later pardoned in 2008.

In addition to the above arguments is the fact that some people are of the opinion that the death penalty has no place in a civilized society. To kill another human being for whatever reason should be considered a very low immoral act which demonstrates a lack of appreciation for the precious gift of life which we have all been given. Furthermore, most major religions of the world express the need for forgiveness. Executing inmates on death row is as far from this particular teaching as you could get.

Overall, it can be said that innocent people can be executed wrongfully and that a truly developed society should be able to find a more productive way of dealing with serious criminals. I therefore remain firmly of the stand point that the death penalty is totally unethical and ineffective

Internet crime is increasing rapidly as growing numbers of people purchase goods over the internet. What can be done to tackle this problem?

Following a significant increase in the number of financial transactions taking place online in recent years, internet crime levels have also increased dramatically. I believe this is due to the fact that people often think that they are safe when they are sat behind a computer and that they cannot be caught easily. This essay shall explore some ways of reducing these types of crimes.

One of the most effective ways of reducing online crime levels might be to make every internet user log-in with their passport number or national identification card number. Most countries assign at least one of these numbers to each citizen so this would make it very easy to track down who had done what crime and when. If potential criminals were made to identify themselves online in this manner when they first log on then it may cause them to think twice about conducting illegal activities.

Another method which may also aid online crime reduction would be to regulate the websites that the general public was allowed to access. This would mean that rather than the public being able to visit any type of websites they want to, they would only be allowed to access websites which were secure and not linked in any way to criminal activity. For example, certain web-sites such as Alphabaymarket.com sell fire-arms and drugs and are infamous for being places where illegal activities and transactions take place. Eliminating access to them could therefore aid in crime level reduction.

Overall, making people identify themselves online and restricting access to certain web-sites could help in online crime reduction. Personally, I feel the government need to take responsibility for implementing some or all of the above ideas.

Some people believe that poverty is the cause of most crimes.

Do you agree or disagree?

Fast Track To A Band 7+ With My Proven Course!

While some people believe prison is the best place for criminals others think that there are better ways to handle them.

What is your opinion?

Violence in society increases when more violence is shown on television.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In some communities the teenage crime rate is growing. Some people believe that regardless of age, teenagers who commit major crimes should receive punishment that is the same as an adults.

Some people believe certain prisoners should be forced to do community work with no pay rather than being simply kept inside a prison cell.

The crime rate nowadays is lower than in the past because of the increased use of advanced technology which can prevent and solve crimes.

Some countries are experiencing an increase in the rates of crime. Many people believe that getting more police walking the streets is the best way to prevent crime from occurring.

Discussion Essays

Back to top

Many people think that having one single fixed punishment for all crimes would be more effective.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a fixed punishment?

Discussion and Opinion Essays

Some people think that giving harsher prison sentences and punishments is the best way to reduce crime rates, others however believe there are alternative methods that need to be explored.

Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to hand out longer prison sentences, whilst other people think that there are better methods of doing reducing crime.

Discuss both views and give your opinion .

Some people think that the government should be responsible for reducing crime, where as others believe individuals should take responsibility for their own safety and security.

Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Many criminals after being released go on to commit further crimes as soon as they are allowed out of prison.

What do you think are the causes of this and what possible solutions can you suggest?

Situation Essays

In some poorer areas of large cities people are too afraid to leave their houses at night time due to a fear of crime.

What are the causes of crime in those areas and what can be done to tackle those problems?

In many large cities around the world youth crime is growing at a fast rate.

What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions.

Crime rates in most countries are often higher in urban areas than in rural areas.

What do you think are the reasons for this and what can be done to lower the crime rates?

It is thought that the increase in youth crime rates can be linked to an increase in violence shown in the media.

Do you agree that this is the main factor causing juvenile crime and what ideas can you offer to deal with the situation?

Many crimes are often linked to the consumption of alcohol. Some people think that banning alcohol sales would dramatically reduce crime.

Do you think it is an effective measure against crime and what other solutions can you suggest?

IELTS Writing Task 1 (Academic)

Discover how to describe all types of visual data that you may see in this part of the test.

IELTS Listening

Sshhhhh! Listen closely, here are some valuable tips, techniques and strategies for maximising your listening band score.

IELTS Writing Task 1 (General)

Discover how to write in the correct format and tone for this part of the test.

IELTS Speaking

Learn 'what' to say and 'how' to say it in each part of the test to impress the examiner.

IELTS Writing Task 2

Discover the 5 step process for writing band 7 essays in 40 minutes or less.

IELTS Reading

Here we reveal the best method for completing each part of the reading test.

"Grab Your IELTS Writing Task 2 Cheat Sheet Here!"

Tired of wasting time and money trying to write a band 7 essay? Then let the ‘Cheat Sheet’ do the work!

We value your privacy and would never spam you

• Opinion essay structure
• Step-by-step instructions
• Common topic areas
• Practice questions
• Sentence by sentence guide
• The 6 Golden rules for success

Copyright 2017 - IELTS Freeway - All Rights Reserved

Powered by OptimizePress 2.0