starbucks harvard case study summary

Starbucks Reinvented

Harvard Business School Professor and historian Nancy Koehn has studied Starbucks and its leader, Howard Schultz, for close to 20 years. For her, the company represents much more than a phenomenal success story.

In a recently published case, "Starbucks Coffee Company: Transformation and Renewal," (available soon) Koehn and coauthors Kelly McNamara, Nora Khan, and Elizabeth Legris trace the dramatic arc of the company's past seven-plus years—a period that saw Starbucks teeter on the brink of insolvency, dig deep to renew its sense of purpose and direction, and launch itself in new, untested arenas that define the company as it exists today.

"This case distills 20 years of my thinking about the most important lessons of strategy, leadership, and managing in turbulence in the frame of a very relevant company," says Koehn, the James E. Robison Professor of Business Administration. "As a brand, leadership, and entrepreneurship scholar, I've been dogging Starbucks for a long time."

On a 1995 trip to Seattle, Koehn visited a Starbucks store for the first time and was struck by what she saw and felt. The notion of a "third place" between home and work to relax and enjoy the small, affordable luxury of a special coffee beverage seemed to resonate with the social and economic moment, she recalls. Six months later she met Howard Schultz, an entrepreneur who acquired the company in 1987, and was struck by his seriousness of purpose and the breadth of what he wanted to accomplish.

The case, Koehn's fourth to focus on Starbucks, opens in February 2007. Schultz, no longer Starbucks' CEO but still its chairman, is worried the company is losing its ability to be true to its values while providing a store experience that conveys a sense of comfort, connection, and respect for its product and the communities Starbucks serves.

So Schultz composed a heartfelt, searching memo to senior leadership. In it, he bemoaned decisions (for which he accepted responsibility) that improved efficiency and increased economies of scale but robbed stores of some of their essential magic, such as the smell of roasting coffee and the sights and sounds of traditional Italian espresso machines and baristas at work.

He also cited the company's rapid expansion and the potential "commoditization" of the Starbucks brand. "[W]e desperately need to look into the mirror and realize it's time to get back to the core and make the changes necessary to evoke the heritage, the tradition, and the passion that we all have for the true Starbucks Experience," Schultz wrote.

The scope and richness of Koehn's case gives it the feel of a page-turning novel; in that sense, Schultz's memo is the inciting action for all that follows.

Remaining True To Core Values

The challenge that had confronted Starbucks in the early- and mid-2000s was one common to many organizations: Could the company continue to grow while preserving its culture and values? In some areas, the drive to expand, egged on by Wall Street, was compromising the company's ability to invest in its partners (Starbucks' term for its employees), deliver personalized customer service, and maintain a close connection to the local community.

In addition, McDonald's and Dunkin' Donuts had emerged as serious competitors, offering their own lines of specialty coffee beverages. Even so, Starbucks' financials for 2007, the year Schultz composed his memo, didn't look so bad. But the entrepreneur became concerned as he dug more deeply into the numbers. Sure, revenues were up almost 21 percent over the previous year, but had slowed by over a third; transactions per store were up 1 percent, versus 5 percent the year before. Same-store sales rose only 5 percent, the smallest increase in five years.

In January 2008, Schultz returned as Starbucks CEO, replacing Jim Donald, the man he and other senior colleagues had chosen to lead the company.

Starbucks Sails Again

The case chronicles the blizzard of decisions and initiatives that follow what could have been the company's death knell as the financial crisis hit home and consumers cinched their belts.

"Schultz understood that you can't lift your foot off the gas pedal when you're attempting to transform a company," Koehn says. "Severe as its financial needs may be, you also have to figure out what you will invest in. Schultz knew that if he waited until the company was out of the woods to invest in new products, communication channels, and ways of doing business it would be too late—Starbucks would no longer be relevant."

From the start, Schultz sent the clear, unwavering message that Starbucks' transformation would represent a return to its roots and an uncompromising commitment to core values, such as health care benefits for any partners working at least 20 hours a week.

At a March 2008 gathering of 200 senior-level company leaders, Schultz unveiled a Transformation Agenda that included seven "Big Moves":

• Be the undisputed coffee authority;
• Engage and inspire our partners;
• Ignite the emotional attachment with our customers;
• Expand our global presence—while making each store the heart of a local neighborhood;
• Be a leader in ethical sourcing and environmental impact;
• Creative innovation growth platforms worthy of our coffee;
• Deliver a sustainable economic model.

The case provides a behind-the-scenes look at how the coffee company moved forward on these goals, including the introduction of the milder Pike Place Roast; the story of its VIA Ready Brew line; the launch of a loyalty program; investment in and engagement with social media; focus on a global expansion strategy; and the extension of social programs. The company closed stores, restructured its manufacturing and supply operations, and, perhaps most significantly, took steps to reengage its partners and store managers. In February 2008, Starbucks closed more than 7,000 of its stores across the country for "Espresso Excellence Training," taking the time to work with approximately 135,000 baristas to ensure they could pour a perfect espresso shot and steam milk properly.

For Schultz, however, that wasn't enough—he wanted to reach the company's store managers, recognizing them as essential to the transformation process.

"I needed an unfiltered venue for expressing my empathy about all that we were asking our partners to do and telling them plainly what was at stake," he wrote in Onward: How Starbucks Fought for Its Life without Losing Its Soul . The answer, in Schultz's mind, was a three-day conference in New Orleans in October 2008, a moment when the global economy happened to be tanking. Starbucks' fourth quarter profits were down 97 percent from the same time a year earlier; for the fiscal year, net earnings were down 53 percent to $316 million. The Starbucks board was reluctant to send 10,000 partners to New Orleans at a cost of $30 million, but Schultz stuck to his guns.

In addition to rolling up their sleeves and taking part in community service projects to aid areas of the city still recovering from Hurricane Katrina, partners participated in team-building events that reviewed the company's guiding principles and reminded them of their central role in the customer experience. Schultz also brought in Bono, lead singer of U2, to announce a partnership to channel proceeds from holiday beverage sales to the Global Fund in support of AIDS relief programs in Africa.

The New Orleans conference was a turning point for Starbucks; in the "novel" of Koehn's case, it's the climax.

"Investing in a conference of that size is such an unusual thing to do when faced with a cash crunch," Koehn says. "Schultz understood that what saves and breaks businesses is much more than cash. In the midst of so much turbulence, it's all too easy to pull levers on the low-hanging fruit of cash and logistics. But you don't save a business and turn it around without speaking to, focusing, and calling on the spirit of your people."

Schultz's experience qualifies him for closer study in Koehn's HBS course Power and Glory in Turbulent Times: The History of Leadership from Henry V to Steve Jobs. Not all managers are confronted in their careers with the sort of transformation challenge faced by Starbucks, but Schultz's reflections and actions are instructive for anyone charged with finding sources of strength, innovation, and renewal in today's turbulent business environment, Koehn says.

• Marty Forman Sr
• President/CEO, CMI Global Inc..
• Chris Gallup
• Solutions Architect, Savvy Network Logic
• Mary Setterholm
• Barista and Harvard Graduate
• Paul Donham
• Web manager, Sailing Ship Adventures (.com)
• steve glazer
• ceo, stevens world
• Pat McGillycuddy
• Regional CEO, IDI Gazeley - Brookfield Logistics Properties.
• SVP, Children's Hospital
• Merle Boniface
• Director of Business and Planning, Diocesan School for Girls
• Archie Mutyambizi
• Entrepreneur, Gratestroke Investments
• Jane Egerton-Idehen
• Key Account Manager, Ericsson Ghana
• Eric PIETRAC
• HR VP, Subsea7
• P.G.SUBRAMANIAN
• DIRECTOR, CATALYST PROFIN CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD
• John T Hays MBA '64
• Founder and first CEO, Coffees of Hawaii Inc.
• Solution Sales Manager, Ericsson
• Dr. R. Krishna
• Director, Strategic Solutions
• Emmanuel Alfieris
• Executive Director, Commonwealth Bank of Australia
• Kapil Kumar Sopory
• Company Secretary, SMEC(India) Private Limited
• Victor Martinez
• Director, Kawasaki
• Bernard Rosauer
• President, www.ThreeBellCurves.com
• 24 Jan 2024

Why Boeing’s Problems with the 737 MAX Began More Than 25 Years Ago

• 25 Jan 2022
• Research & Ideas

More Proof That Money Can Buy Happiness (or a Life with Less Stress)

• 25 Feb 2019

How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

• 22 Apr 2024

When Does Impact Investing Make the Biggest Impact?

• 15 Apr 2024

Struggling With a Big Management Decision? Start by Asking What Really Matters

• Change Management
• Motivation and Incentives
• Organizations
• Growth Management
• Transformation
• Food and Beverage
• United States

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

• Utility Menu

Nithin Reddy Geereddy

Master's Degree Candidate, Class of 2014 Concentration(s): Finance and Business Statistics.

Strategic Analysis of Starbucks Corporation

Recent Publications

Dow's Bid for Rohm and Hass

Brought to you by:

Starbucks: Driving Growth Through New Dining Occasions

By: Mohanbir Sawhney

In 2008, Starbucks was in crisis as a result of undisciplined growth and loss of focus, and its stock declined almost 70%. In August of that year, Howard Schultz, the founder of Starbucks, came out…

• Length: 8 page(s)
• Publication Date: Aug 10, 2018
• Discipline: Marketing
• Product #: KE1079-PDF-ENG

What's included:

• Teaching Note
• Educator Copy

$4.95 per student

degree granting course

$8.95 per student

non-degree granting course

Get access to this material, plus much more with a free Educator Account:

• Access to world-famous HBS cases
• Up to 60% off materials for your students
• Resources for teaching online
• Tips and reviews from other Educators

Already registered? Sign in

• Student Registration
• Non-Academic Registration
• Included Materials

In 2008, Starbucks was in crisis as a result of undisciplined growth and loss of focus, and its stock declined almost 70%. In August of that year, Howard Schultz, the founder of Starbucks, came out of retirement to take over as the CEO. The company regained its footing by refocusing on its core and driving strong organic growth. By 2014, the stock price had reached $40, an all-time high. To prevent history from repeating itself, Schultz wanted to ensure that Starbucks' growth strategies not only addressed market opportunities, but also were aligned with the company's brand image, assets, and capabilities. Starbucks announced a five-year growth plan in December 2014 with ambitious goals that included nearly doubling its revenues from $16 billion to $30 billion, doubling operating income, and expanding its footprint to more than 30,000 stores globally by 2019. The growth plan consisted of seven specific growth strategies, one of which was the New Occasions strategy. The objective of New Occasions was to drive growth by diversifying Starbucks' revenues beyond breakfast to the lunch, afternoon, and evening dayparts. Starbucks created specific offerings for each daypart, called the Lunch, Sunset, and Evenings programs. The case focuses on evaluating these three occasions-based growth opportunities and identifying the best path forward.

Learning Objectives

After reading and analyzing the case, students will be able to identify growth opportunities by applying the "Jobs to Be Done" (JTBD) framework to generate customer insights; assess growth opportunities using an opportunity analysis framework; and understand the importance of disciplined growth and appreciate the fact that not all growth is good growth.

Aug 10, 2018

Discipline:

Geographies:

United States

Industries:

Non-alcoholic beverage industry, Restaurants and food service industry

Kellogg School of Management

KE1079-PDF-ENG

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience, including personalizing content. Learn More . By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and revised Privacy Policy .

How Starbucks Became Everyone's Cup Of Coffee

Table of contents.

Starbucks Coffee Company boasts impressive stats:

• Owns 40% share of US Coffee Market
• Earns $24,72 billion worldwide
• Has 29,324 stores worldwide in 72 countries
• Over 14,000 of total stores in the United States / over 27,000 worldwide
• Conducts over 90 million transactions per week
• So popular in China, a new store opens every 15 hours
• Following McDonald's as the most valuable fast food brand worldwide (valued at $44.5 billion)

It will be very hard to achieve something Starbucks did since 1971 when the company started. There’s a lot of firsts when it comes to the company. First to introduce the new coffee culture, the first privately owned company which offered all their employees health insurance AND the share of the company.

The CEO, Howard Schultz, who might even run for president at some point , achieved something that is almost impossible — appeal to shareholders, employees, and customers at the same time. This is my giant case study on how to achieve world domination in case you want to bring an old product to the new market.

{{cta('eed3a6a3-0c12-4c96-9964-ac5329a94a27')}}

The Starbucks Idea

The coffee culture in the United States before the 80s was nonexistent. 

Americans were used to huge cans of ground coffee and they couldn’t care less about the flavor. Even if you’d go outside your household to a dinner you would be met with a generic drip coffee or styrofoam cups of foul-tasting joe at the workplace. No one even thought about the flavor, the origin, or anything more sophisticated tied to the drink.

The 70s coffee culture didn’t exist at all.

In 1970 three college friends: Gordon Bowker, Jerry Baldwin, Zev Siegl went into the coffee business together. They set up a shop and sold roasted beans. They received the knowledge from a man named Alfred Peet (if that rings a bell, yes he is the owner of Peet’s Coffee). Alfred was one of the most knowledgeable people in the country about coffee. He knew where to source it, how to roast it. He was the first to introduce dark roasted and french roasted beans.

In 1971, the three friends opened the roastery and bean shop in Pike’s Place, Seattle’s famous tourist destination known for the Pike’s Public Market Center. Peet helped the young entrepreneurs by providing them with beans and connecting them with reliable bean providers.

The name Starbucks stuck because it’s easy to say, impossible to misspell, and has a vaguely British overtone to it. Really, we picked it because our lawyer called and told us we had to submit papers and needed a name. We didn’t know at the time, but Starbuck is the name of the first mate on the Pequod in Moby Dick. That might explain the siren logo. Some might even say it comes from Mount Rainier's Mining company Starbo . According to Gordon Bowker, they were initially going for the name Cargo House Coffee .

The business was successful enough for the trio so they opened 4 more shops in Seattle. However, no coffee drinks were being served. This was still a roasted bean retail shop intended for home use.

At that time Starbucks was competing against instant coffee cans. The quality was stark and thus the business went well. Things were about to change when the founders hired the head of marketing and sales, Howard Schultz in 1982.

The Inclination for Grit and Determination Fix Social Injustice

Howard Schultz was a child raised in poverty. After seeing his father injuring himself doing grueling manual labor, he decided he wanted to get rid of the injustice of the working class. An idea of creating and striving for an environment where employees are fairly compensated and taken care of has been set in.

In Masters of Scale interview with Reid Hoffman, Schultz described seeing his father stretched out on the sofa after suffering an injury. Howard Schultz swore to himself to make a company his father had never worked for.

“I saw my father losing his sense of dignity and self-respect. I am sure that this was caused mostly by the fact that he has been treated as an ordinary working man.” – Howard Schultz, AstrumPeople article

Schultz started working at the age of 12 selling newspapers. Since he was being athletic, Howard earned an athletic scholarship at Northern Michigan University where he received his Bachelor’s degree in Communications in 1975.

After his graduation, Howard Schultz spent three years as a sales manager at Xerox, and then he started working at a Swedish company Hammarplast , where he was selling home appliances, including coffee grinders to businesses like Starbucks.

The Starbucks founder trio took him amidst to grow the company.

In 1983, Howard Schultz gets an epiphany. He travels to Milan, Italy for some sort of conference and what he sees there changes his perception of coffee forever. In certain European countries, especially Italy, coffee was one of the more important things in life. It served as a social lubricant and the third place of dwelling between home and work. Schultz discovered what it means to have a high-quality espresso served in a proper way in a relaxed environment.

He was determined to bring this piece of coffee culture back to the United States. The founders gave in after continuous pressure from Schultz to open an espresso bar. Eventually, they gave him an opportunity to open up a coffee bar inside a store. It was incredibly popular. But the owners didn’t want to turn the coffee retail business into a cafe.

“After Milan I flew back to the United States, excited to share what I experienced. But my bosses, the first founders of Starbucks, for whom I had tremendous respect, did not share my dream of re-creating the coffee bar experience in Seattle. I was crushed, but my belief was so powerful that, in April 1986, I left Starbucks and raised money from local investors to found my own retail coffee company. I named it Il Giornale after Milan’s daily newspaper.

In 1985 Howard Schultz opened his own cafe chain - Il Giornale . He wanted to pursue the dream and went back to Starbucks owners and offered to buy all 6 stores that were operational at that time. With the help of raised venture capital he succeeded and became the CEO after the successful acquisition with $3.6M.

The hyper-growth began.

Key takeaway #1 — change is good

The determination and unrelenting belief to change the current situation is not just a helpful attribute but a prerequisite for cultural change. Staying true to the “one thing” without flinching will be the cause and the driver of change.

“An Old Product in the New Market”

Whenever something works out on an incredible scale in one market, there’s a potential of seeing it succeed in a new one. This is called introducing an old product to a new market.

For example, Uber and Lyft built an incredible business about ride-sharing. Because they have to contain the growth before they are spread too thin, that gives the opportunity to copy-cats in different markets. In the United Arab Emirates, you have Careem ( just recently acquired by Uber ), in Croatia you’ve got have Cammeo and in India, you’ve got sRide .

After something experiences great success, there is only a matter of time before someone else sees the potential and brings it back to the new market, and starts eating out the market share

Coffee was a big opportunity in the United States at that time. Howard Schultz saw with his own eyes how effective and important it is in Italy and he knew he could do something similar in the United States. To perform a similar innovative (for the new market) service you would need to take the entire concept and localize it to the new market.

Even the trends from 2004 to this day shows an upward trend in coffee:

This go-to-market product strategy was first introduced In 1957 by Russian American mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff. The Ansoff Matrix was published in Harvard Business Review in the article “Strategies for Diversification”. In his opinion, there are only two ways to develop a growth strategy — varying what is sold (product growth) and to whom it is sold (market growth).

Market development — new market, existing product

The Starbucks go-to strategy was to bring the already established product in different cultural and geographical spaces into the new market — the coffee-culture deprived United States.

Howard Schultz’s task was to closely observe how Italians treat the product and figure out a way to bring it home with minor changes. It was impossible to expect that the new market is going to slurp macchiatos from tiny espresso cups but everyone could understand comfort and better quality. That was going to be Starbucks’s trump card.

Market penetration — old market, old product

The most obvious strategy is to sell the existing product to the existing market. With this concept there’s a little risk since the companies don’t have to educate the market with the new product, however, the growth is inhibited by competition or decreasing trends.

Diversification - new market, new product

By far the riskiest approach is introducing a new product in new markets. Not only the product needs to provide clear values, but it also has to educate its use in the new market.

Imagine bringing augmented reality technology to a country where there’s no practical use for it yet. Since there’s a great risk, it can also result in amazing success where you’re the only provider in the blue ocean market.

Most of the startups are banking on this strategy.

Product development - old market, new product

This strategy is most often used by established brands that are already known as leaders in their field. If a washing machine company introduces a new technology that also folds your clothes after washing and drying, that would be much easier to understand and adapt to their existing users.

Key takeaway #2 — do market research

When developing the new market, learn as much as possible about the product itself in the location where it’s mostly used and established. Identify all the major benefits and think of the most significant values that would succeed in the new market

Eco-Conscious, Friendly People, and Profitable — Starbucks’ Triple balancing act

Howard Schultz had an idea to build something that is almost impossible to imagine and can exist only in Utopia. From the start, he wanted to serve with equal importance towards customers and employees.

This is almost impossible to achieve since on one end the business investors want to see money coming in, which in most cases means lean running staff with lower wages and higher-priced products. The staff, or “ partners ” as Howard Schultz calls its employees, are not only compensated a fair wage ( between $10 to $15/hour according to Glassdoor ) but also have healthcare insurance and discounted stock options for company shares.

Howard went even further, offering full tuition coverage through Arizona State University's online degree program .

This idea was most likely outrageous to shareholders. Everyone will get a piece of the company’s pie?

In a Tim Ferriss interview with Jim Collins, the author of Built to Last and Good to Great mentioned the final lesson of his mentor and all-around management superhero Peter Drucker:

“The management isn’t about being more efficient all the time, but it’s also being more humane at the same time.

Striving for workplace quality for the employees was thus one of the main values the CEO implemented in the company.

The interesting analogy is Jordan Peterson’s theory of order and chaos (yin and yang) where one side represents the profit that company must achieve by ruthlessly cutting back the cost in the workforce and the other side where the conscience of doing the right thing for your people brings satisfaction and peace to the workplace which is a proven necessity for customer-facing businesses.

Key takeaway #3 — happy employees make happy clients

Treat your people well. When you’re in the service industry the customer satisfaction and treatment are at times more important than the actual product. And happy employees make happy clients.

The Product

Better coffee.

To coffee drinkers, there are not a lot of things more important than a good coffee in the morning or during the day. By today’s standards, Starbucks drinks aren’t at the level of barista artisans and coffee aficionados. But when the shops started opening in the early 70s, 80s, and 90s, the espressos and lattes were vastly different from all the other stuff people were drinking.

Coffee is generally roasted in three ways: light, medium, or dark, depending on the time dedicated to the coffee beans’ roasting.

In a light roast, you would notice a fruity and acidic taste. Coffee beans are actually considered fruit and are sometimes called cherries. That is the reason you taste light roast as acidic with fruit notes.

In Medium roast, the coffee tastes the sweetest. The glucose levels reach the point where the glucose starts to break. Coffee roasters would say the medium roast is the most balanced since it’s not bitter nor acidic but something in between.

In dark roast, you can taste the bitterness due to burned beans.

Coffee quality comparison

Starbucks predominantly use dark roast coffee which also represents the majority of the coffee that is being consumed in North America. As mentioned, the coffee quality was much better than instant abominations in the early 80s; however, it definitely cannot measure up to artisan roasters.

There are two main reasons:

1— Dark roast is cheaper and can be produced in mass quantities. Similarly to green tea, the light roast-worthy beans are grown in shady, high-altitudes where it produces the most sweetness. High-quality matcha (powdered green tea leaves) is intentionally kept in the shade so it produces more photosynthesis and better taste. Since Starbucks has to supply tens of thousands of shops, they have to bring the mass supply to the cafes. Brian Stoffel from El Toledo roastery in Costa Rica says: “It would be financially stupid for a large chain to buy high-quality coffee beans and use them for dark roast coffee.”

This brings us to…

2— The coffee has to taste the same across the cafes to guarantee uniformity. With dark roast, the flavors of the beans are getting covered up in the same way as overseasoning a dish or overcooking a steak.

But it wasn’t just about the coffee alone. The branding kicks in and people pay for something they want to eventually become. Drinking Starbucks drinks meant they are sophisticated, culturally progressive individuals who enjoyed the premium experience of coffee-drinking culture from fashionable Milano streets.

The slim and elegant takeaway cups proudly wore the green siren logo so the passers-by noticed the person drinking that exact coffee. These cups were different from styrofoam cups in the office or fast food joints.

A similar tactic was used by Apple with the launch of iPods and white earbuds. The iPod was a cool new gadget you had to wear to be relevant in modern society. Apple made it in such a way that people noticed which users had iPods — because they plugged white earbuds into them.

This was a genius idea because the users were immediately differentiated from other less-cool mp3 gadget-using people. Secondly, this was a perfect silent word-of-mouth strategy. If local influencers were seen using white earbuds, everyone else wanted to get on that trend. This strategy is viral in concept and is used by many companies; however, it’s harder to implement it on a distinctive level.

Later on, Starbucks adapted to the marketing with something called “horizontal offer”. It wasn’t just about the dark roast and espresso shots. Young budding students wanted something sweet and mocha just hit the note between coffee and rich chocolate fudge. Why not having both in one product?

Later on, Starbucks started offering teas and snacks. Snack is bringing in a substantial amount of revenue. The shops are using the display of sweet pastry or savory egg sandwiches like any expert pastry shop in Europe. And there are not many people who can resist a croissant, cinnamon roll, or blueberry muffin with their americano or latte.

The food is bringing in more than 20% of all revenue . The pasty was the start, but the company followed up by offering breakfast sandwiches. The adaptation to the market goes even further.

With the recent diet trends in health and fitness, Starbucks has you covered with gluten-free, protein-rich snacks.

With all the addition and expansions to serve a larger audience, it’s inevitable to create resistance groups who blame Starbucks as a commodity coffee provider. And they would be right, it has become that because their system of sourcing beans has to ensure the stock supplies for thousands of shops. But by becoming the main coffee dealer to the masses all the micro-roasters and man-bun wearing, tattoo-sleeved barista artists can fall on their knees and thank the mighty green Siren for creating a market for them.

The need for coffee has increased substantially with the introduction of better coffee, so it created another pocket of niche providers of premium roasted bean roasters.

The price of a cup

Most of the coffee shops live well because they can afford hefty margins. An 80% markup is a standard in the coffee business, especially on the higher-end brews. According to the Small Business Development Center’s 2012 report, food costs take up about 15 percent of revenues on average. The average coffee shop then has a gross margin of 85 percent.

Starbucks margins must be pretty loaded then since they buy tons of coffee from a few sources. According to Coffee Makers USA, the actual coffee in a grande Starbucks cappuccino costs about 31 cents.

For a commodity product such as coffee, Starbucks drinks are quite up there on the more expensive tier ranging from $2.15 for a tall drip to $5.95 for a seasonal frappuccino concoction. But taking into consideration the physical positioning ( Chapter 5 — Coffee Locations ), paying off employees and staff the actual margin per coffee sold are 7% .

Historically, Starbucks has been raising the prices per cup over the years. Since it has poured a lot of equity into maintaining the brand image, it can afford to have a steeper price than its competitors (McDonald's and Dunkin Donuts). Instead of losing the price-sensitive customers, Starbucks differentiates itself from the before-mentioned companies and thus keeping the brand image of a premium java provider.

However, as Tucker Dawson from PriceIntelligently mentions, the prices aren’t increased across the whole product offering . The high-margin items have stayed the same.

Product differentiation

By having a strong and recognizable brand, the company can afford to put out merchandise. Starbucks holiday-themed mugs and localized artwork on them are a big part of the exposure. The merch cabinets and tables are usually near the counters or areas where there’s a longer dwelling time.

The revenue isn’t coming just from the beverages alone. Starbucks did an amazing job of offering non-caffeinated beverages including kids drinks and teas which were introduced after partnerships or acquisitions of Tazo and Teavana.

Starbucks started to diversify its products, pushed them into retail space, and also added teas.

The big drivers are also snacks, wholesale beans, before-mentioned merch, and coffee equipment.

Key takeaway #4 — diversify and expand

While the product is one of the key components of a successful business think about its potential upgrades. Keeping the core you can diversify the offering (and acquire new revenue channels) by expanding into different verticals but staying inside your core company values.

Experience is More Important Than The Product Itself

With a distinctive brand identity, Starbucks shops are easily recognizable anywhere in the World. For a global brand, this is one of the mandatory elements. Each franchise is slightly different than the other — Starbucks in the posh downtown area will have a different feel than the one on the Student campus or at an airport.

But each store follows certain guidelines which are prescribed. In tech and startups, product development follows a concept called minimal acceptance criteria . In other words, what are the lowest common denominators the dev team needs to do before it can be rolled out as a published version.

For Starbucks Cafes, even though the store managers have a certain freedom to run and maintain the facility, they have to ensure to deliver the core Starbucks qualities.

• Indie playing music
• Comfortable (community) tables for remote work
• Reliable wireless connection
• Charging Outlets

These shouldn’t just be taken for granted. People love some sense of predictability in their lives. How many times have you been on the lookout for Starbucks when visiting a new country just to take advantage of their wi-fi connection and use of restroom? From that perspective, Starbucks serves as a transactional facility offering other services which don’t have much to do with coffee.

The main idea is, coffee is not the product that is being sold at Starbucks cafes — the whole thing is a social experiment of creating a meeting place between people. It serves as some sort of oasis for meeting up with friends, having a snack and a cup of coffee in a comfy chair while listening to the latest Indie playlists . Starbucks is less in the coffee business as is in people’s business as well.

“It’s not Starbucks coffee you are getting, it’s the Starbucks experience. “

By calling your name and writing it on the cup, it doesn’t just inform the customer that their drink is ready. It allows a more personalized service since we love hearing and seeing our name.

Smells and sounds

Starbucks Sounds

Chances are when you go to Starbucks you don’t ever hear the music. But it plays an important role nevertheless. Starbucks playlists are carefully curated to help create that ambiance of a neighborhood coffee shop.

It has been a piece of the Starbucks experience for over 40 years already . The songs and tracks are carefully curated way ahead of time. These handcrafted playlists usually consist of indie, feel-good songs, pop, alt-country to season-themed or even classical playlists during holidays.

In 1999, Starbucks even acquired a Bay Area music store to launch its own branded coffeehouse and later on, even a record label. In the early 2000s, Starbucks sold CDs in the store until the format decline. In 2016, Starbucks partnered with Spotify . Through the mobile app integration, Spotify plays music as part of the app. In-store listeners can take a look inside to identify the artists and save the tracks to their playlists.

Holly Hinton and David Legry, the in-house music curators, are responsible for what gets played. What sounds like the best job in the world, actually is. Their sole work is searching for the right tracks and artists that they can see are fit to be played in the coffee shop.

In an interview with Fast Company , Holy Hinton said:

“We want our customers to walk in and have a ‘What’s that song?’ moment. We want them to hear interesting, cool music that they might not hear when they turn the radio on. It’s music that we think is cool and would sound beautiful in the coffee shop. It’s the music that we’d want to hear on Sunday morning when we’re reading the paper and drinking coffee. It’s a friend-to-friend personal. And we’re lucky to be able to be a part of that.”

To localize the experience, every region is slightly customized regarding the music, while still carrying the same vibe Starbucks customers are used to. This way, whenever a customer comes to the cafe, within the first few seconds, they feel accustomed based on the music alone.

The interior design

Every piece of furniture and interior is carefully planned to conform to the standards of the homey coffee place.

To get their store right, Starbucks interviewed hundreds of coffee drinkers to get as much information which they could use to build a perfect coffee shop. The overwhelming consensus actually had nothing to do with coffee; what consumers sought was a place of relaxation, a place of belonging.

If we go back to Howard Schultz’s deciding moment from the Milanese coffee shops, it shows he managed to do just that. Create a community space as a second home. It’s somewhere where people meet, it’s where you can take someone for a first date or even get some work done at the large community table.

In the book Starbucked, freelance journalist Taylor Clark claims, that “The round tables in a Starbucks store were strategically created in an effort to protect self-esteem for those coffee-drinkers flying solo. After all, there are no “empty” seats at a round table.”

If we looked at the interior, the counters, chairs, and wardrobes are built out of natural materials like warm woods and stone. In some stores, you would find cozy armchairs as well. With the Shared Planet initiative , they doubled down with environmental sustainability in mind and employing local craftsmen to do the job. The stores are built from reused and recycled materials wherever possible.

Most of the new stores that are being built are a part of the LEED Certification program (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design).

Starbucks differentiates from three general looks with the addition of concept designs:

• Heritage coffee houses reflect the history of the place where the store is located. At Pike Place, the coffee shop reflects the merchant trading roots with worn wood, stained concrete or tiled floors, metal stools, and factory-inspired lighting. Even more sophisticated is the New Orleans inspired coffeehouse showing the rich music history.
• A “Louisian merchant in the early 1900s” inspired heritage coffeehouse with vintage trombones light fixtures. Located in French Quarter, New Orleans.
• Artisan stores echo the industrial past of urban markets, taking inspiration from the Modernism of the 1930s. This motif celebrates simple materials like exposed steel beams, masonry walls, factory casement glass, and hand-polished woodwork in a creative gathering place for culture and the arts.

• Regional Modern are localized stylized coffee shops. The interior is spacious. comfortable and welcoming. The bright, loft-like, light-filled spaces punctuated with regionally inspired furniture and culturally relevant fabrics create a calm and contemporary respite from the clamor of the fast-paced world.

• Experimental — with growth and a plethora of locations comes more daring and innovative designs. Unique designs such as the reimagined drive-thru in Colorado , the Swiss Train contemporary mobile coffee space from Geneva Airport to St. Gallen or one of the beautiful Shinto shrine-inspired coffee shops in Japan

‍ Starbucks Reserve

To combat the upscale coffee market which ironically has to thank Starbucks for creating fertile grounds of demand for premium coffee, Starbucks started opening up so-called Starbucks Reserve stores. These are luxurious, beautiful, and magnificent stores where they roast premium, rare beans and experiment with different brewing techniques.

CNN Money described the store concept as "an open, marketplace-style" with a Princi bakery counter, a full liquor bar, and a Reserve coffee bar, with tables, lounge areas, and two fireplaces.

"Our Reserve store takes the best of coffee craft as well as artisan baking and layers in a marketplace-style customer experience creating a space that has both energy and moments of intimacy," — Liz Muller, VP of Creative, Global Design & Innovation at Starbucks

Coffee shop locations

In any high-traffic area in the city where Starbucks is located, you almost have a feeling their shops are everywhere. You would be partially right — Starbucks are strategically located in areas with high appeal. Similarly to Walgreens, Starbucks chose the concept of the convenience store, always located in an area of larger foot-traffic .

Source | A snapshot of Starbucks shops in Seattle

Arthur Rubinfeld who is responsible for Starbucks’ location selection, explained there are about 20 or so analytic experts around the world who are assessing different factors of the appropriate area for the new Starbucks shop .

Key takeaway #5 — spoil your customers

Think beyond the product and identify what else can you do for the customer to add you in their daily, weekly routine. Customer support excellence is mandatory, so think further and in the direction of the place’s ambiance including smells and sounds.

Breaking down the Brand and Messaging

Bill Macaitis, former CMO of Slack said it best - “The brand is the sum of all customer touchpoints your customers have with you at any point”. With the food and beverage category, this is even more important.

By introducing and creating a culture of coffee drinking, Starbucks had a major opportunity to create intimacy with the customer. In Italy, coffee culture is a part of every day and the same culture was slowly getting familiar to the new audience.

Because of the personal nature of coffee and frequency of visits, this relationship-bonding happened much faster than in other fast-food joints, especially since in the early years of Starbucks there was no competition.

Brand and product

The bright white cups with the green siren are the first noticeable brand. But it goes beyond that. You will notice that Starbucks never offers any sort of discounts or actions like buy-one-get-one-free. That’s sort of action dilutes the premium feel of the brand. You can get a free coffee drink for your birthday, but the underlying reason for that is for a customer to develop a positive connection with the brand and company.

The most valuable assets of the regular Starbucks coffee shop can be broken down:

☕Free reliable Wifi - besides oxygen, water, and sleep, the online connection has become a necessity in modern civilization. Whenever you’re in a new place and you need to connect, one of the first options would be a Starbucks shop.

☕Comfortable seats and community tables - whether you’re there to take a breather or putting some hours of online work or organizing an impromptu study group, there’s a Starbucks location that can provide those demands. Most of the Starbucks are generously equipped with charging outlets as well, so you can get another drink after your focus is starting to drop… and then another… And another...

☕Friendly baristas - customer service is ingrained in the retail work description yet rarely done the right way. With L.A.T.T.E. method (Chapter 8 - Disciplined Action) and general training of Starbucks partners , each interaction with the customer is there to provide a positive experience. Calling people by their name, timely service, and the patience of crafting ridiculously complex drink orders .

☕Brand colors and materials — the nature-influenced interior with dark colors and wood finishes are giving a feel of hominess. Sometimes a Starbuck visit is just a pause you take in a day to relax your eyes.

☕Music and smells — coffee and snacks just smell amazing. Let’s take that for granted. The music serves a purpose as well as bringing an ambiance that is great for having a conversation or focusing on work (or your date).

Key takeaway #6 — positive interactions

The brand is the sum of all touchpoints the customer has with the company. This goes beyond the product and customer service. Think about every single interaction customers have with you and make them positive.

Starbucks Master Example of Mobile Retention and App Rewards

Starbucks mastered the mobile game at the right time. Dabbling with mobile technology since 2007, Adam Brotman spearheaded the platform to maximize the effect. The big challenge was to align it with the brand.

“We don't look at mobile in a vacuum. We have an overall digital strategy that's all about building relationships with our customers, and that strategy runs across a number of digital touchpoints. We're looking at mobile, Web and social to think more holistically about how we engage with our customers and tell our story." — Adam Brotman, Chief Digital Officer

In the Manifest survey in 2018, 500 smartphone owners rated their satisfaction using food apps. Starbucks had the most popular and regularly used loyalty rewards app — 48% of users used it on a daily basis.

Four years later, Starbucks remains one of the most popular apps, ranking number 6 on the list of most downloaded Food & Drink apps. 

The mobile switch paid dividends with time. Instead of support and enhancing physical visits to the store, the channel began bringing in 23% of all the revenue.

Ordering ahead of time and user experience

For a food mobile app to be successful, it must bring value to the user, be easy or even fun to use and it should have entertaining, dynamic content.

The design has to adhere to rules of the brand, achieve a consistent visual look and continuity across all touchpoints.

The mobile app design is no different than the rest of the materials Starbucks uses.

Digital Engagement paid tremendous dividends for the company.

Starbucks CFO Scott Maw said almost all of the company’s same-store sales growth has come from customers that have digital relationships with the company and those that are in the Starbucks Rewards program.

User-friendly design

This is the minimal and easiest thing to leverage on. With a strong brand, it should not be hard to create an appealing visual interface and create logic flow and transitions or continuation to the desired action.

Engaging loyalty program

Retention is the name of the game. If a customer trusts you well enough to download your app, you have a unique opportunity to convert him or her to be a regular user.

Starbucks has a similar strategy with the reward system. Every day there’s a slight reward, whether it’s collecting points or showing the current mouth-watering warm drink inside the app. It’s sticky and you can’t help but wish for a warm beverage.

Mobile pay and ordering

The North American market is known for heavy mobile use . By prepaying and using the device to quickly go through the ordering process, the customers feel more efficient and slightly more an advantage than the other poor souls who still buy their coffee with credit cards or cash.

Integration with other platforms and services

Partnerships are ways to get tons of new users with one big swoop. Spotify acquired one million users a few days after partnering with Facebook (Source) and Facebook had one sexy product update from it as well. For similar reasons, Starbucks used Spotify to enrich the experience of the mobile app.

Now playing highlight in Starbucks stores (Music is a big part of the brand and having perennial "Shazam" embedded brings seemingly insignificant, yet positive experience.

UX/UI — breaking down the mobile app design

Out of this world personalized experience.

The app remembers your favorite order. This is ingenious. We’ve mentioned how coffee represents a daily habit - if Starbucks manages to infiltrate itself into your habit loop, they’ve won. They have become a part of your daily routine. Stacy always stops at the same drive-through Starbucks, orders her Grande Latte with Soy Milk at 6:15 am before she checks-in at her job. When that’s her daily or even only a few time per week routine, the LTV for that kind of customer is absolutely amazing!

Every little detail counts. For instance, here’s the customized greeting each time a user opens the app’s Home tab.

Gamification

Most addictive phone games always give you something to do if you’re not using them for a while. From Candy Crush Saga to Supercell’s engineered mobile drugs like Clash of Clans and Boom Beach, the mechanics of engagement are carefully predicted for maximum time and cash spend. These games start with low difficulty. They are fun, colorful, and offer an entertaining introduction to their mechanics. But you can play all day, and after a while (on a free tier) you’re locked out of the game.

To continue playing, you can either (literally) buy your time or increase your chances of success with extra loot, power levels, or something similar.

Starbucks uses a similar principle of gamifying its mobile app. There’s a lot of value upfront (pay with a card, skip the line, earn credits for free drinks) but it serves the company’s profit. You get hooked to those stars (credits) which are stacking in your beautifully designed mobile app.

There are also challenges for extra Starbucks points (who can say no to double credit days?)

With the app, Starbucks gets you to try new products and thus increase the range of products you are consuming AND it gives the company an opportunity to increase the average order revenue per customer.

There’s a thin line between being overbearing and being just enough engaging. And at the same time, they have to be very strategic on the number of features offered. Sean Ellis , the OG Growth hacker said the product is ready to ship once all the unnecessary features are taken away (kind of the same mentality as per good design). Luckily with MILLIONS of users, Starbucks can apply some Data Science magic and figure those timings for every type of person.

Personalization goes even further - it tries to give a similar experience as to visiting the store ( source )

Starbucks Loyalty Program on triple-caffeine nitro power

The Starbucks Rewards are dead simple - the more you spend the more stars you get. Besides the stars, the rewards program offers birthday rewards, phone payments, paying ahead, free in-store refills and special offers and events for members. As expected the experience is personalized for each user.

The Rewards work like gangbusters! More than 14.2 million active members in the U.S. are invested in the loyalty program and the mobile strategy has seen an 11% growth in users in Q2 2018 . The gamification of the program and “spend more, earn more” in some cases represent 39% of the entire chain's sales .

Here’s what’s ingenious about the mobile program. Even though there are people who prefer to have the minimum number of apps on their phone and think twice before opening the doors for the elite club on their smartphone storage, the Starbucks app is a trojan horse of benefits - even if you don’t care about collecting stars, it’s tough to say no to the free birthday drink or the convenient mobile pay.

Online Ordering and easy payments flatten the friction of getting the product. Just like the Amazon 1-click purchase or Slack’s onboarding sequence , the same goes for picking up a mocha and Petite Vanilla Bean Scone. At first, Starbucks had some issues, since the mobile members had to wait in line just like the others, but Starbucks responded by adding dedicated stations for mobile order-ahead customers.

Members can skip the waiting line and enjoy the jealous looks while feeling elite of themselves.

The beauty of the app isn’t giving one big benefit of a quicker caffeine shot to the member, but it serves as an upsell marketing tool. The Starbucks app is a delivery method for presenting new items ahead of time. These generate interest and coupled with email notifications, it gives their customers something to look forward to.

To keep the retention flat, the Rewards program has “punishment” traits tied into it. If you’re not using the stars for visiting the cafes you start losing them. This psychological trick, known as The Endowment Effect , helps to nudge those people who are affected more about losing something they already have.

The Mobile part is one of the main drivers of customer retention and has proven to raise the average order size per customer. Since the frequency of orders and visits is so high, the LTV per customer contributes to that impressive double-digit growth in the first years.

Key takeaway #7 - APP A mobile app for a product that is being used on a daily basis and is in the lifestyle category is not a nice to have, but almost mandatory. If you want to stay a part of your customer's daily lives, bring the entertainment, rewards, and gamification to keep retention and customer satisfaction high. You will be rewarded with increased LTV.

The Success Flywheel of Starbucks

The easiest way to figure out and identify the success of a company is to apply the try-and-true framework. Jim Collins, the author of Good to Great, Built to Last claims all mega-successful companies have to figure out the Flywheel principle .

To become an unstoppable juggernaut in its own field, Starbucks had to align 5-6 different elements in three categories:

• Disciplined People
• Level 5 Leadership
• First Who… Then What
• Disciplined Thought
• Face the Reality
• Hedgehog Concept
• Disciplined Action

Culture of Discipline

• Leveraging the Technology

Imagine the concepts as drivers of one giant flywheel. Let’s say you’d want to move a giant stone wheel that sits on an axle. It would take a lot of effort to get it moving at first. After gaining speed it would need less and less power to keep it going. After gaining momentum, the same wheel would run on its own with little interaction. Just like the extremely simplified quote says; “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Disciplined people - Starbucks Level 5 Leadership

Excerpt from Good to Great -> “Level 5 leaders display a powerful mixture of personal humility and indomitable will. They're incredibly ambitious, but their ambition is first and foremost for the cause, for the organization and its purpose, not themselves. While Level 5 leaders can come in many personality packages, they are often self-effacing, quiet, reserved, and even shy. Every good-to-great transition in our research began with a Level 5 leader who motivated the enterprise more with inspired standards than inspiring personality.”

There’s no doubt, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz possesses the characteristics and personality traits of a Level 5 leader. The ambition alone to introduce a new cultural concept in a new market sounds incredibly daunting, but to play it right with the shareholders, customers and their own people sounds impossible.

But that was the initial idea, a moral standard. The mission statement of Starbucks is:

“to inspire and nurture the human spirit – one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time.”

Let’s break this down into two pieces.

Inspire and nurture the human spirit .

The people, customers, and partners (staff) are the most important assets of any company. The first part of the mission statement explains that in a split-second. The relationships within the company have to be nurtured and supported while exuding warmth and friendliness.

Howard Schultz has shown respect for the mission by developing programs for their own people, which include free education, health insurance and even a share in the Starbucks company.

“One person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time .”

The second part stresses the importance of gradual improvement. Each interaction with a customer, each cup of coffee made hold a large amount of responsibility to deliver the right experience. The neighborhood part reminds the staff and the customers that the stores pay special respect and attention to the place where they are located.

In the article Inside Starbucks’s $35 Million Mission , author Sarah Kessler describes how Starbucks runs the “ Leadership Lab ” — part leadership, part training conference for 10,000 store managers.

Disciplined thought

Face the Reality — When stuff gets hard, leaders don’t turn away from the problem or worse, get busy with mundane tasks, deceiving themselves they are working. Closing your eyes to the reality means you’re on a great way to a downward spiral.

In 2008, Howard Schultz got reinstated by the board as CEO. The sales and shares were dropping. The brand and the culture of Starbucks were deteriorating rapidly. The magical experience was a shadow of its former self.

Schultz decided on a radical idea to close all the stores and retrain in order to inflict the importance of the Starbucks vision and mission. Tied into this transition was closing numerous shops and letting go of hundreds of employees. The ordeal cost the company 6 to 7 million dollars .

In 2018, Starbucks closed the doors again in order to put the staff through racial anti-bias training. The temporary closure cost the company between $15 - $20 million dollars

But it was necessary and long needed. The company picked up from the bottom just like in Drake’s song and has been rapidly growing in the world’s map as well as on index stock charts.

The Hedgehog Concept

The term Hedgehog concept introduced by Collins is some sort of a marriage consisting of a Venn diagram and three major ideas. Jim Collins thinks that in order to have a chance to be the best in the world you have to possess all three:

• The Elite Skill - You will have to be the best in your area of expertise. Constant learning, innovating and moving the boundaries are expected from the movers and shakers of the world.
• Deep Passion - Someone who grows a business will eventually (and continuously) encounter major obstacles where the skill isn’t going to be enough. The grit, powered with a deep passion and a reason why is arguably even more important than the knowledge alone.
• Ability to generate revenue - Understanding of what drives the economic engine is the third piece of the puzzle that completes the concept. No business can survive without sustaining itself and its people financially.

Schultz possesses all three: the Stanford education armed him to become shrewd and dangerous in the business world with a deep understanding of the economic machine while he stayed in love with the company and continued to deeply care for its people and the customers.

The second part of the hedgehog concept is the sheer simplicity of your objective. When it comes to specializing and becoming the best in the world, you need one clear statement which completely prevails over all the others.

The hedgehog is the exact opposite of the fox concept. Foxes are cunning, smart and resourceful animals who take any opportunity to get ahead using any tactic they can think off. Yet when they encounter and attack the hedgehog, the hedgehog simply rolls up into a ball and protects itself with its spiky hide.

The hedgehog companies have one major driving goal that is ingrained as the cornerstone of its business. In Starbucks, it’s not the coffee quality, but it’s the deep desire to create an experience for their customers. Everything is tied into this.

Sometimes, achieving massive rapid growth for the growth sake reveals cracks in the system if it’s not solid. In 2008, when the company was on the decline, Schulz looked at the strategy of the past few years and, in a letter penned company-wide, explained that Starbucks had “invested in infrastructure ahead of the growth curve” and it was time to “shift our emphasis back onto customer-facing initiatives.”

Imagine, the Starbucks insane growth pace required to hire 1,500 new employees a week.

Disciplined action

The success of anything in our lives is in the hands of people. It always is the #1 element in any company.

“In determining the right people, the good-to-great companies placed greater weight on character attributes than on specific educational background, practical skills, specialized knowledge, or work experience.”

When the quality of the work started slipping. Schultz had to close down hundreds of shops for a training day. It was a necessary decision to refocus, restructure and boost Starbucks employees to work and deliver on the right things and to deliver the experience as it was intended in the first place.

When faced with a difficult customer or a problem, the Starbucks partners (employees) are taught customer service by using a L.A.T.T.E. system. The acronym helps baristas deal with any situation in the store.

• L isten to the customer
• A cknowledge the problem/situation
• T ake actions and solve the problem
• T hank the customer
• E xplain what you did

The simple system isn’t there just to provide clear guidelines but it also boosts motivation and willpower among employers. In the book, The Power of Habit , Charles Duhigg wrote that the LATTE system prevented the customer service meltdown , and sustained willpower throughout the day.

In the end, customer service is there to deliver and exceed the experience which is tied to the brand. Nothing is as important as delivering the service. 

“[Employees] are the true ambassadors of our brand, the real merchants of romance and theater, and as such the primary catalysts for delighting customers. Give them reasons to believe in their work and that they’re part of a larger mission, the theory goes, and they’ll in turn personally elevate the experience for each customer–something you can hardly accomplish with a billboard or a 30-second spot.” — Excerpt from book Onward, Howard Schultz

Technology Accelerators

For a globally recognizable brand like Starbucks technology plays a major role in the expansion. The Starbucks app and the emails alone played a significant role in the company’s growth.

According to Collins, technology accelerators have to be carefully selected. Companies had to sift through the emerging technology, identify and select the right ones and gradually introduce them in the business model.

The Hedgehog Concept would drive the use of technology, not the other way around — Jim Collins

Companies that jumped the gun burned badly.

In fact, Jim Collins discovered that more than 80% of great companies didn't rank technology as one of the top five ranking factors for success.

“Those that stay true to these fundamentals and maintain their balance, even in times of great change and disruption, will accumulate the momentum that creates breakthrough momentum. — Jim Collins

Down to the core, Starbucks has one secret ingredient to thank for — knowing their customers. Data analytics. According to Starbucks, this function uses “ methodologies ranging from ethnography to big data analytics … that help support Starbucks pricing strategy, real estate development planning, product development, trade promotion optimization, and marketing strategy.”

Starbucks contracts with a location-analytics company called Esri to use its technology platform that helps analyze maps and retail locations. It uses data like population density, average incomes, and traffic patterns to identify target areas for a new store.

The Crawl, Walk, Run Concept

The gradual introduction of technology is a part of the hedgehog concept. Technology is a major proponent of business growth however if it doesn’t tie into the one simple concept , the company has to be disciplined enough to say no to new opportunities.

Eventually, they can adapt the technology in their concept which turns the massive flywheel forward.

In Starbucks sense, they seem like they embrace technology. They started out with gift cards and pay-ahead mobile purchases. The next step was adding the Starbucks Rewards program to cultivate upsells and raise the LTV per customer. And today with big data, AI, and predictable algorithms they maximize the relationship with the customers.

Key takeaway #8 — the flywheel concept

Successful companies that persevered and thrived with time have found and adopted the Flywheel concept. Focusing on the essentials of the business, working with the right people in the right places, and maintaining discipline is the only way for continued sustainable growth.

Starbucks Vs the World

Competitors.

Starbucks enjoyed the blue ocean marketplace as a premium coffee culture experience provider. 

But as soon as competitors noticed Starbucks discovering a new opportunity they had to react quickly. McDonald's and Dunkin’ Donuts were the big ones that introduced their own versions of coffee-to-go. Better than instant coffee and convenient while on the go, the two competitors did enjoy new revenue stream of introducing coffee; however, as companies, they had to keep the focus on what they are good at — McDonald's with their fast food burgers and fries and Dunkin’ Donuts with well… donuts. DD does serve coffee but had no intention to put more emphasis on it until the late 1990s .

Starbucks kept the lead in the coffee concept because of its focus on the coffee culture and holistic concept of their brand, especially customer service. This point can be seen as soon as you look at international markets. Dunkin' Donuts’ international revenue in 2018 contributed less than 4% of total sales, while roughly 30% of Starbucks' consolidated net revenues in the same period were attributed to markets outside America.

When international expansion goes right

When you get it right and you know you have the brand, processes, and culture down, you can move outside. When Starbucks expanded its adopted “Coffee culture” to new markets it could follow its own tracks again. In many countries, especially Asian nations the idea of a coffee culture was new, fresh, and exciting.

To overcome the culture gap, Starbucks sought partnership through direct investments and joint ventures instead of direct franchising . This solved two major problems.

First, they relied on local retailers who already had experience and experience in the local markets. They married the coffee culture idea with market research of the new areas to discover regional customers’ tastes and preferences. After that, they just had to deliver the employee training, workflows, and the product itself.

Secondly, they acquired and absorbed the entire pieces of coffee markets , such as Coffee Partners in Thailand and Bonstar in Singapore. All in one big swoop.

But even today a Starbucks café is opened every 15th hour in China. It already operates more than 3,000 stores in China and plans to add 2,000 more by 2021 . Seoul has the most Starbucks cafes in any city ( 284 ).

Starbucks is present in 6 continents and in more than 72 countries and territories. But it wasn’t always smooth sailing for the old Starbuck.

And when it doesn’t go so well

While Starbucks had amazing success in Asian countries, they hit a snag in Australia.

In 2008, they closed two-thirds of all stores.

The reason?

Australia is already known as one of the hardest markets to get into in the first place and they are very proud of their coffee culture. The flat whites, coffee art in ceramic lattes have been served for dozens of years at beloved local cafes and by baristas who knew what they are doing.

What Starbucks was doing in the United States was introducing the coffee culture in the new market because it was non-existent before. But in Australia, this model didn’t fit in at all.

In 2008, Starbucks closed two-thirds of all the stores. The prices of Starbucks’ relatively common-tasting coffee (compared to established coffee shops) were pricier than the local solutions and managed by young students who didn’t have the level of appreciation of either the coffee culture and/or Starbucks as a brand.

Key takeaway #9 — establish yourself

Follow the winning formula of developing the markets first and turning into a product innovator after you have established yourself. Forcing the innovation where it’s not perceived as such, is waging a losing battle.

Starbucks on Social Media

The website is simply designed with an intention to present the latest seasonal product in the Starbucks shops in the first fold. The focus of the homepage is also on advertising the Starbucks Rewards program.

According to SimilarWeb, it attracts 18.9M visits per month, with an average of 2 minutes and 3.2 page views per session. Starbucks site is the 9th top ranked site for Food and Drink category in the world

The Youtube channel was established at the end of 2005. After 16 years it managed to acquire 335,000 subscribers, which isn't’ that much if we take the size of the company into consideration.

The most successful videos are close to 10 million views; however, they are short, 15-seconds clips of the product. The channel moderators are not participating in the comment sections.

Luckily there’s not much competition on YouTube; however, as a highly visual channel, Starbucks could advertise their mobile app and Starbucks reward program using socially-conscious values, product innovation, or sustainability programs.

On the other hand, Instagram is doing absolutely amazing. Naturally, since the best Starbucks customers are the ones who have been using their mobile devices for ordering and participating in the Starbucks Rewards program

Starbucks Instagram uses a mix of images and video clips mostly displaying their well-designed cups. The posts are mostly re-shared (“regrams”) of other Instagram users. With this tactic, Starbucks incentivizes UGC (user-generated content), since Instagram users have the chance to be regrammed and have their Starbucks shot seen by 17.8 million followers.

Pinterest is another great visual platform where images are split into different categories: from coffee recipes, coffee photography to store designs and world-recognized Starbucks cups.

Pinterest receives 10+ million monthly views and has 443,600 followers.

Even though their daily support is dropping, Facebook is still being used as one of the channels where Starbucks shows its videos and posts.

On Twitter , Starbucks shares its globally conscious ideas, news, and stories about the company and its products. Twitter also serves as a chance to (as in Instagram) retweet other users’ posts.

Starbucks likes to reshare the positive messages of happy users who had a positive experience at one of their stores

Since Starbucks' success mainly lies in their visual branding, they use social media for their brand awareness and in a Facebook sense, pushing the mobile app downloads.

Key takeaway #10 — delegate your resources

When using social media, identify which social media platform brings the best results. If your users are primarily on mobile devices, Instagram would be a smart choice. Delegate your resources to the best-performing channel.

Starbucks Corp. has become a worldwide success by sticking to its hedgehog concept. The realization of being customer-centric in the practical, not just theoretical sense laid the foundation of expansion in North American markets as well as international ones.

When all of the decisions are catered to the concept of serving their customers, including using technology as accelerators, there’s nothing to worry about in their future.

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

HBS Case Selections

Innovation at Moog Inc.

• Brian J. Hall
• Ashley V. Whillans
• Davis Heniford
• Dominika Randle
• Caroline Witten

Innovation at Google Ads: The Sales Acceleration and Innovation Labs (SAIL) (A)

• Linda A. Hill
• Emily Tedards

Juan Valdez: Innovation in Caffeination

• Michael I. Norton
• Jeremy Dann

UGG Steps into the Metaverse

• Shunyuan Zhang
• Sharon Joseph
• Sunil Gupta
• Julia Kelley

Metaverse Wars

• David B. Yoffie
• Matt Higgins

Roblox: Virtual Commerce in the Metaverse

• Ayelet Israeli
• Nicole Tempest Keller

Timnit Gebru: "SILENCED No More" on AI Bias and The Harms of Large Language Models

• Tsedal Neeley
• Stefani Ruper

Hugging Face: Serving AI on a Platform

• Shane Greenstein
• Kerry Herman
• Sarah Gulick

SmartOne: Building an AI Data Business

• Karim R. Lakhani
• Pippa Tubman Armerding
• Gamze Yucaoglu
• Fares Khrais

Honeywell and the Great Recession (A)

• Sandra J. Sucher
• Susan Winterberg

Target: Responding to the Recession

• Ranjay Gulati
• Catherine Ross
• Richard S. Ruback
• Royce Yudkoff

Hometown Foods: Changing Price Amid Inflation

• Julian De Freitas
• Jeremy Yang
• Das Narayandas

Elon Musk's Big Bets

• Eric Baldwin

Elon Musk: Balancing Purpose and Risk

• Shikhar Ghosh
• Sarah Mehta

Tesla's CEO Compensation Plan

• Krishna G. Palepu
• John R. Wells
• Gabriel Ellsworth

China Rapid Finance: The Collapse of China's P2P Lending Industry

• William C. Kirby
• Bonnie Yining Cao
• John P. McHugh

Forbidden City: Launching a Craft Beer in China

• Christopher A. Bartlett
• Carole Carlson

Booking.com

• Stefan Thomke
• Daniela Beyersdorfer

Innovation at Uber: The Launch of Express POOL

• Chiara Farronato
• Alan MacCormack

Racial Discrimination on Airbnb (A)

• Michael Luca
• Scott Stern
• Hyunjin Kim

GitLab and the Future of All-Remote Work (A)

• Prithwiraj Choudhury
• Emma Salomon

TCS: From Physical Offices to Borderless Work

Creating a virtual internship at goldman sachs.

• Iavor Bojinov

Unilever's Response to the Future of Work

• William R. Kerr
• Emilie Billaud
• Mette Fuglsang Hjortshoej

AT&T, Retraining, and the Workforce of Tomorrow

• Joseph B. Fuller
• Carl Kreitzberg

Leading Change in Talent at L'Oreal

• Lakshmi Ramarajan
• Vincent Dessain
• Emer Moloney
• William W. George
• Andrew N. McLean

Eve Hall: The African American Investment Fund in Milwaukee

• Steven S. Rogers
• Alterrell Mills

United Housing - Otis Gates

• Mercer Cook

The Home Depot: Leadership in Crisis Management

• Herman B. Leonard
• Marc J. Epstein
• Melissa Tritter

The Great East Japan Earthquake (B): Fast Retailing Group's Response

• Hirotaka Takeuchi
• Kenichi Nonomura
• Dena Neuenschwander
• Meghan Ricci
• Kate Schoch
• Sergey Vartanov

Insurer of Last Resort?: The Federal Financial Response to September 11

• David A. Moss
• Sarah Brennan

Under Armour

• Rory McDonald
• Clayton M. Christensen
• Daniel West
• Jonathan E. Palmer
• Tonia Junker

Hunley, Inc.: Casting for Growth

• John A. Quelch
• James T. Kindley

Bitfury: Blockchain for Government

• Mitchell B. Weiss
• Elena Corsi

Deutsche Bank: Pursuing Blockchain Opportunities (A)

• Lynda M. Applegate
• Christoph Muller-Bloch

Maersk: Betting on Blockchain

• Scott Johnson

Yum! Brands

• Jordan Siegel
• Christopher Poliquin

Bharti Airtel in Africa

• Tanya Bijlani

Li & Fung 2012

• F. Warren McFarlan
• Michael Shih-ta Chen
• Keith Chi-ho Wong

Sony and the JK Wedding Dance

• John Deighton
• Leora Kornfeld

United Breaks Guitars

David dao on united airlines.

• Benjamin Edelman
• Jenny Sanford

Marketing Reading: Digital Marketing

• Joseph Davin

Social Strategy at Nike

• Mikolaj Jan Piskorski
• Ryan Johnson

The Tate's Digital Transformation

Social strategy at american express, mellon financial and the bank of new york.

• Carliss Y. Baldwin
• Ryan D. Taliaferro

The Walt Disney Company and Pixar, Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire?

• Juan Alcacer
• David J. Collis

Dow's Bid for Rohm and Haas

• Benjamin C. Esty

Finance Reading: The Mergers and Acquisitions Process

• John Coates

Apple: Privacy vs. Safety? (A)

• Henry W. McGee
• Nien-he Hsieh
• Sarah McAra

Sidewalk Labs: Privacy in a City Built from the Internet Up

• Leslie K. John

Data Breach at Equifax

• Suraj Srinivasan
• Quinn Pitcher
• Jonah S. Goldberg

Apple's Core

• Noam Wasserman

Design Thinking and Innovation at Apple

• Barbara Feinberg

Apple Inc. in 2012

• Penelope Rossano

Iz-Lynn Chan at Far East Organization (Abridged)

• Anthony J. Mayo
• Dana M. Teppert

Barbara Norris: Leading Change in the General Surgery Unit

• Boris Groysberg
• Nitin Nohria
• Deborah Bell

Adobe Systems: Working Towards a "Suite" Release (A)

• David A. Thomas
• Lauren Barley
• Jan W. Rivkin

Starbucks Coffee Company: Transformation and Renewal

• Nancy F. Koehn
• Kelly McNamara
• Nora N. Khan
• Elizabeth Legris

JCPenney: Back in Business

• K. Shelette Stewart
• Christine Snively

Home Nursing of North Carolina

Castronics, llc, gemini investors, angie's list: ratings pioneer turns 20.

• Robert J. Dolan

Basecamp: Pricing

• Frank V. Cespedes
• Robb Fitzsimmons

J.C. Penney's "Fair and Square" Pricing Strategy

J.c. penney's 'fair and square' strategy (c): back to the future.

• Jose B. Alvarez

Osaro: Picking the best path

• James Palano
• Bastiane Huang

HubSpot and Motion AI: Chatbot-Enabled CRM

• Thomas Steenburgh

GROW: Using Artificial Intelligence to Screen Human Intelligence

• Ethan S. Bernstein
• Paul D. McKinnon
• Paul Yarabe

Arup: Building the Water Cube

• Robert G. Eccles
• Amy C. Edmondson
• Dilyana Karadzhova

(Re)Building a Global Team: Tariq Khan at Tek

Managing a global team: greg james at sun microsystems, inc. (a).

• Thomas J. DeLong

Organizational Behavior Reading: Leading Global Teams

Ron ventura at mitchell memorial hospital.

• Heide Abelli

Anthony Starks at InSiL Therapeutics (A)

• Gary P. Pisano
• Vicki L. Sato

Wolfgang Keller at Konigsbrau-TAK (A)

• John J. Gabarro

The 2010 Chilean Mining Rescue (A)

• Faaiza Rashid

IDEO: Human-Centered Service Design

• Ryan W. Buell
• Andrew Otazo
• Benjamin Jones
• Alexis Brownell

David Neeleman: Flight Path of a Servant Leader (A)

• Matthew D. Breitfelder

Coach Hurley at St. Anthony High School

• Scott A. Snook
• Bradley C. Lawrence

Shapiro Global

• Michael Brookshire
• Monica Haugen
• Michelle Kravetz
• Sarah Sommer

Kathryn McNeil (A)

• Joseph L. Badaracco Jr.
• Jerry Useem

Carol Fishman Cohen: Professional Career Reentry (A)

• Myra M. Hart
• Robin J. Ely
• Susan Wojewoda

Alex Montana at ESH Manufacturing Co.

• Michael Kernish

Michelle Levene (A)

• Tiziana Casciaro
• Victoria W. Winston

John and Andrea Rice: Entrepreneurship and Life

• Howard H. Stevenson
• Janet Kraus
• Shirley M. Spence

Partner Center

Digital Innovation and Transformation

Mba student perspectives.

• Assignments
• Assignment: Competing with Data

The Perfect Blend: Starbucks and Data Analytics

Every day, Starbucks grinds through mounds of coffee beans to serve its customers. In doing so, the company has also been collecting mounds of data that could be used to improve customer experience and business performance. In this article, we will investigate how this 26 Billion USD company captures value through data analytics.

An opportunity brewing

Through its network of over 30,000 stores worldwide, Starbucks has been gathering over 100 million transactions a week. To make use of these data, the company set up a dedicated team of data scientists, led by Jon Francis, Starbucks’ Senior Vice President of enterprise analytics, data science, research data, and analytics. Since then, the team and the company have been able to tap into the power of data analytics to enhance its business performance. 

Using data collected at the store and through its mobile apps with over 17M members, the company has been able to drive business improvements in 3 significant ways. 

(1) Personalized experiences and promotions

Pathways to a Just Digital Future

When Starbucks launched its rewards program and mobile app, they dramatically increased the data they collected and could use to get to know their customers and extract info about purchasing habits. Through its mobile app, Starbucks has been collecting data about what, where, and when members buy coffee. To do so, Starbucks leverages the Digital flywheel program, a cloud-based artificial intelligence engine that’s able to recommend food and drink items in a precise manner. As such, even when people visit a new Starbucks location, the store’s point-of-sale system can identify the customer through their phone and give the barista their preferred order.

Based on customers’ purchase history, Starbucks could also suggest new products a consumer might enjoy and provides unique discounts and rewards on certain items based on customers’ unique preferences. Taking it a step further, Starbucks has also been collecting data on weather patterns and their relationship with customer order patterns. Doing so allows the company to provide even more personalized experiences and promotions such as targeting a customer with cold drinks on hot days.

(2) New product introduction

When launching new products, Starbucks also turned to the data collected to determine what products they should offer. Specifically, when expanding its product lines into grocery stores, the company relies heavily on the data collected. For example,  data collected has shown that 43 percent of tea-drinking customers tend to skip the sugar. To cater to this segment, Starbucks created its lines of unsweetened ice tea. When data has shown that 25 percent of consumers don’t add milk to their coffee, the company launched a new line of black iced coffee without milk.

(3) Location selection

Selecting the right location is critical to winning in retail. Using location-based analytics powered by Atlas, a mapping and business intelligence tool developed by Esri, the company can select the most strategic location to open up its new stores. The tool enables Starbucks to evaluate massive amounts of data including variables such as population, income levels, traffic, competitor presence, and proximity to other Starbucks locations before recommending a new store location. Using these data, the company can also predict revenues, profits, and other aspects of economic performance associated with that location.

While Starbucks was not born in the digital era, it has successfully integrated new technologies into its core business like a digitally native company. Over the years, data analytics has undeniably become the backbone of Starbucks’s continuous improvement. Looking ahead, I have no doubt that Starbucks will continue to gather more data and make even more innovative use of those data to create an even more personalized customer experience and achieve business excellence.  

“Starbucks Isn’t a Coffee Business – It’s a Data Tech Company,” Marker, Jan 16, 2020

“Big Data: The Secret to Starbucks’ Supply Chain Success,” Sisense, Jun 25, 2020

“Starbucks: Using Big Data, Analytics And Artificial Intelligence To Boost Performance,” Forbes, May 28, 2018

“6 Ways in Which Starbucks Uses Big Data,” Analyticsteps, Nov 17, 2020

“How data empowers human connection at Starbucks,” Tableau, Jan 15, 2021

“Starbucks knows how you like your coffee,” CNBC, Apr 6, 2016

Student comments on The Perfect Blend: Starbucks and Data Analytics

Thanks, Max, for the very interesting article! I am just wondering how successfully Starbucks was able to attract new customers with their initiatives with big data. It definitely added a lot of value to existing customers but was it enough to pull customers who like other coffee shops? Also, I wonder what would happen (or maybe is already happening) if competitors start to do the same things with big data. In a such setting, what would be the real competitive advantage? Would it go back to the basic things such as the quality of the coffee?

Great post Max! Very informative. I did not know that Starbucks is actively monitoring the weather information to make product decisions. I would like to know if you think that data is giving Starbucks any sustained competitive advantage?

Leave a comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What the Starbucks case at the Supreme Court is all about. Hint: It's not coffee

Updated April 23, 2024 at 2:12 PM ET

When Starbucks barista Florentino Escobar first heard that the Supreme Court had taken up a case involving him and six of his co-workers from Memphis, Tenn., he was shocked.

“I was like, 'Wait, the Supreme Court? Like we're talking the U.S. Supreme Court?'” he says.

Escobar is one of the Memphis 7, a group of Starbucks baristas and shift supervisors who were fired by the company in February 2022, days after they announced their intent to unionize.

Starbucks said the employees had violated multiple company policies, including allowing a television crew into the store after hours. The workers believe they were fired for trying to organize a union.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments — not about whether Starbucks illegally interfered with the union drive, but about whether a lower court erred in ordering Starbucks to reinstate Escobar and his co-workers while their firings were being investigated.

That order and the decision to grant it are at the heart of the case in front of the nine justices. During oral arguments, the majority of the Supreme Court appeared sympathetic to Starbucks, which argued that the government should have to meet a higher legal bar when it asks courts to intervene during labor investigations.

The Supreme Court's ruling, expected by the end of June, could have far-reaching implications for labor organizing efforts across the U.S. and across industries, from auto to retail to academia and beyond.

An important tool

The order, called a 10(j) injunction, is arguably the most powerful tool the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has to enforce the law. It's also one of the few tools the agency has at its disposal.

Created by Congress in 1935, the NLRB is tasked with safeguarding workers' rights to form unions and collectively seek better working conditions. However, Congress did not give the labor agency the power to fine or otherwise penalize companies for violating those rights.

Enter the 10(j) injunction.

When the NLRB believes unfair labor practices have occurred, it can ask a federal district court to temporarily halt whatever is going on while labor officials gather evidence, hold a hearing and rule on the case.

That's what happened with this Starbucks case. After a preliminary investigation into the Memphis firings, the NLRB asked a federal court in Tennessee for an injunction . The court granted the request and ordered Starbucks to stop interfering with its employees' union activities and temporarily reinstate the Memphis 7.

“To sort of stop the bleeding,” explains Sharon Block, a Harvard Law School professor and former NLRB board member.

That's critical, Block says, because it can take months or even years for the NLRB to process cases. If the allegedly illegal behavior can't be stopped while a case is under investigation, any remedy the labor board might issue as part of a final ruling could be meaningless.

“Life moves on,” Block says. “The organizing campaign may be dead by the time the board issues a decision, because everybody got freaked out by the lead union organizers getting fired.”

A legal fight ensues

In Memphis, the organizing campaign did not die. Union organizers pressed on, the union election was held and baristas voted 11 to 3 to join Workers United, the Starbucks employees union. With the injunction granted, the members of the Memphis 7 went back to work while the NLRB looked into their case.

But Starbucks, unhappy with the lower court's decision to grant the injunction, asked the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to block it.

The court said no. The 6th Circuit agreed with the lower court that “because of the chilling impact of the terminations on Union support, some of the requested interim relief, including temporary reinstatement of the Memphis Seven, was just and proper.”

That's when Starbucks took the case to the Supreme Court.

Two different standards

Starbucks is asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on whether some federal circuits — including the 6th Circuit — set too low a bar for granting injunctions.

Starbucks points to the onerous burden that injunctions can impose on employers, including forcing them to reinstate employees they fired for violations of company policy, and argues that injunctive relief should be granted only in extraordinary cases — and that there should be consistency in how it is granted.

Currently, federal courts use two different standards, or tests, when deciding whether to grant injunctions in cases involving labor organizing. Starbucks wants the Supreme Court to impose one standard across the courts — the one Starbucks considers more rigorous.

Bill Baker, an associate with the employment law firm Wigdor, doubts whether that would make much of a difference.

He studied 10(j) injunction petitions filed between 2011 and 2020 and found that those subjected to what is known as the “more relaxed” test were in fact denied at higher rates.

Moreover, he found that a majority of injunction petitions filed during that period were filed in just two federal circuits — the 2nd and the 9th — both of which already use the test Starbucks favors.

“Whatever the Supreme Court's decision on this is, it won't impact the decisions that these two circuits are making,” say Baker. “I'm sort of skeptical that in the real world, it would have an enormous impact on labor organizing.”

Potential for a strong signal to judges

Still, Harvard's Block worries about the message that a Supreme Court ruling could send.

“If the court says that the standard that was used in this case was wrong, the court is going to be sending a very strong signal that judges should bring more scrutiny to these cases,” she says.

With employers like Starbucks mounting historically aggressive anti-union campaigns, Block says it's the exact wrong time for the Supreme Court to be making it more difficult for federal labor officials to protect workers' rights.

Watching from Memphis

In Memphis, Escobar says he'll be following Tuesday's arguments at the Supreme Court.

“My biggest fear is ... the Supreme Court making it much harder for labor unions across the nation to follow in our footsteps,” he says.

Meanwhile, there has been some movement in the labor board's investigation of the Memphis 7 case. In May 2023, more than a year after the original incident, an NLRB administrative law judge ruled that Starbucks did indeed violate the law when it terminated five of the seven workers, including Escobar, but not the other two.

As part of the NLRB process, that ruling is now awaiting review by a panel of board members, who could uphold it or modify it. Until that happens, the injunction remains in place. Today, five of the Memphis 7 still work for Starbucks, including one of the employees whose firing was deemed justified by the NLRB judge.

More National News

Runaway horses gallop through central London, blazing a path of mayhem and injuries

Columbia to continue talks with student protesters after deadline to clear out passes

Trump to score additional $1.2 billion windfall thanks to his Truth Social app

U.S. bans noncompete agreements for nearly all jobs

• Harvard Business School →
• Faculty & Research →
• June 2006 (Revised April 2007)
• HBS Case Collection

Howard Schultz: Building Starbucks Community

• Format: Print
• | Pages: 11

Related Work

• Faculty Research

Howard Schultz: Building Starbucks Community (B)

• Howard Schultz: Building Starbucks Community (B)  By: William W. George and Lance P. Pierce

• Skip to main content
• Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

What the Starbucks case at the Supreme Court is all about. Hint: It's not coffee

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear a case that originated with Starbucks baristas but could have broad implications for labor organizing. Alex Wong/Getty Images hide caption

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear a case that originated with Starbucks baristas but could have broad implications for labor organizing.

When Starbucks barista Florentino Escobar first heard that the Supreme Court had taken up a case involving him and six of his co-workers from Memphis, Tenn., he was shocked.

"I was like, 'Wait, the Supreme Court? Like we're talking the U.S. Supreme Court?'" he says.

Escobar is one of the Memphis 7, a group of Starbucks baristas and shift supervisors who were fired by the company in February 2022, days after they announced their intent to unionize.

Starbucks said the employees had violated multiple company policies, including allowing a television crew into the store after hours. The workers believe they were fired for trying to organize a union.

The Supreme Court is getting involved in the fight over unionizing at Starbucks

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments — not about whether Starbucks illegally interfered with the union drive, but about whether a lower court erred in ordering Starbucks to reinstate Escobar and his co-workers while their firings were being investigated.

That order and the decision to grant it are at the heart of the case in front of the nine justices. During oral arguments, the majority of the Supreme Court appeared sympathetic to Starbucks, which argued that the government should have to meet a higher legal bar when it asks courts to intervene during labor investigations.

The Supreme Court's ruling, expected by the end of June, could have far-reaching implications for labor organizing efforts across the U.S. and across industries, from auto to retail to academia and beyond.

An important tool

The order, called a 10(j) injunction, is arguably the most powerful tool the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has to enforce the law. It's also one of the few tools the agency has at its disposal.

Amazon, Starbucks worker unions are in limbo, even as UAW and others triumph

Created by Congress in 1935, the NLRB is tasked with safeguarding workers' rights to form unions and collectively seek better working conditions. However, Congress did not give the labor agency the power to fine or otherwise penalize companies for violating those rights.

Enter the 10(j) injunction.

When the NLRB believes unfair labor practices have occurred, it can ask a federal district court to temporarily halt whatever is going on while labor officials gather evidence, hold a hearing and rule on the case.

That's what happened with this Starbucks case. After a preliminary investigation into the Memphis firings, the NLRB asked a federal court in Tennessee for an injunction . The court granted the request and ordered Starbucks to stop interfering with its employees' union activities and temporarily reinstate the Memphis 7.

Union membership grew last year, but only 10% of U.S. workers belong to a union

"To sort of stop the bleeding," explains Sharon Block, a Harvard Law School professor and former NLRB board member.

That's critical, Block says, because it can take months or even years for the NLRB to process cases. If the allegedly illegal behavior can't be stopped while a case is under investigation, any remedy the labor board might issue as part of a final ruling could be meaningless.

"Life moves on," Block says. "The organizing campaign may be dead by the time the board issues a decision, because everybody got freaked out by the lead union organizers getting fired."

A legal fight ensues

In Memphis, the organizing campaign did not die. Union organizers pressed on, the union election was held and baristas voted 11 to 3 to join Workers United, the Starbucks employees union. With the injunction granted, the members of the Memphis 7 went back to work while the NLRB looked into their case.

Florentino Escobar (second from right) and the six other Starbucks employees known together as the Memphis 7 stand in front of a Memphis, Tenn., mural that honors the 1968 Memphis sanitation workers strike. Amy Holden hide caption

Florentino Escobar (second from right) and the six other Starbucks employees known together as the Memphis 7 stand in front of a Memphis, Tenn., mural that honors the 1968 Memphis sanitation workers strike.

But Starbucks, unhappy with the lower court's decision to grant the injunction, asked the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to block it.

The court said no. The 6th Circuit agreed with the lower court that "because of the chilling impact of the terminations on Union support, some of the requested interim relief, including temporary reinstatement of the Memphis Seven, was just and proper."

That's when Starbucks took the case to the Supreme Court.

Two different standards

Starbucks is asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on whether some federal circuits — including the 6th Circuit — set too low a bar for granting injunctions.

Starbucks points to the onerous burden that injunctions can impose on employers, including forcing them to reinstate employees they fired for violations of company policy, and argues that injunctive relief should be granted only in extraordinary cases — and that there should be consistency in how it is granted.

Currently, federal courts use two different standards, or tests, when deciding whether to grant injunctions in cases involving labor organizing. Starbucks wants the Supreme Court to impose one standard across the courts — the one Starbucks considers more rigorous.

The New Ground Zero For Unions: Coffee Houses

The barista uprising: coffee shop workers ignite a union renewal.

Bill Baker, an associate with the employment law firm Wigdor, doubts whether that would make much of a difference.

He studied 10(j) injunction petitions filed between 2011 and 2020 and found that those subjected to what is known as the "more relaxed" test were in fact denied at higher rates.

Moreover, he found that a majority of injunction petitions filed during that period were filed in just two federal circuits — the 2nd and the 9th — both of which already use the test Starbucks favors.

"Whatever the Supreme Court's decision on this is, it won't impact the decisions that these two circuits are making," say Baker. "I'm sort of skeptical that in the real world, it would have an enormous impact on labor organizing."

Potential for a strong signal to judges

Still, Harvard's Block worries about the message that a Supreme Court ruling could send.

"If the court says that the standard that was used in this case was wrong, the court is going to be sending a very strong signal that judges should bring more scrutiny to these cases," she says.

With employers like Starbucks mounting historically aggressive anti-union campaigns, Block says it's the exact wrong time for the Supreme Court to be making it more difficult for federal labor officials to protect workers' rights.

In clash with Bernie Sanders, Starbucks' Howard Schultz insists he's no union buster

Watching from memphis.

In Memphis, Escobar says he'll be following Tuesday's arguments at the Supreme Court.

"My biggest fear is ... the Supreme Court making it much harder for labor unions across the nation to follow in our footsteps," he says.

Meanwhile, there has been some movement in the labor board's investigation of the Memphis 7 case. In May 2023, more than a year after the original incident, an NLRB administrative law judge ruled that Starbucks did indeed violate the law when it terminated five of the seven workers, including Escobar, but not the other two.

As part of the NLRB process, that ruling is now awaiting review by a panel of board members, who could uphold it or modify it. Until that happens, the injunction remains in place. Today, five of the Memphis 7 still work for Starbucks, including one of the employees whose firing was deemed justified by the NLRB judge.

NPR's Alina Selyukh contributed to this report.

• injunctions
• labor organizing
• Supreme Court

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Take action

• Report an antitrust violation
• File adjudicative documents
• Find banned debt collectors
• View competition guidance
• Competition Matters Blog

New HSR thresholds and filing fees for 2024

View all Competition Matters Blog posts

We work to advance government policies that protect consumers and promote competition.

View Policy

Search or browse the Legal Library

Find legal resources and guidance to understand your business responsibilities and comply with the law.

Browse legal resources

• Find policy statements
• Submit a public comment

Vision and Priorities

Memo from Chair Lina M. Khan to commission staff and commissioners regarding the vision and priorities for the FTC.

Technology Blog

Data and models: a quote book from the tech summit on ai.

View all Technology Blog posts

Advice and Guidance

Learn more about your rights as a consumer and how to spot and avoid scams. Find the resources you need to understand how consumer protection law impacts your business.

• Report fraud
• Report identity theft
• Register for Do Not Call
• Sign up for consumer alerts
• Get Business Blog updates
• Get your free credit report
• Find refund cases
• Order bulk publications
• Consumer Advice
• Shopping and Donating
• Credit, Loans, and Debt
• Jobs and Making Money
• Unwanted Calls, Emails, and Texts
• Identity Theft and Online Security
• Business Guidance
• Advertising and Marketing
• Credit and Finance
• Privacy and Security
• By Industry
• For Small Businesses
• Browse Business Guidance Resources
• Business Blog

Servicemembers: Your tool for financial readiness

Visit militaryconsumer.gov

Get consumer protection basics, plain and simple

Visit consumer.gov

Learn how the FTC protects free enterprise and consumers

Visit Competition Counts

Looking for competition guidance?

• Competition Guidance

News and Events

Latest news, ftc sends refunds to ring customers stemming from 2023 settlement over charges the company failed to block employees and hackers from accessing consumer videos.

View News and Events

Upcoming Event

Commissioner bedoya speaks at loyola university school of law’s 24th annual loyola antitrust colloquium.

View more Events

Sign up for the latest news

Follow us on social media

-->   -->   -->   -->   -->  

Playing it Safe: Explore the FTC's Top Video Game Cases

Learn about the FTC's notable video game cases and what our agency is doing to keep the public safe.

Latest Data Visualization

FTC Refunds to Consumers

Explore refund statistics including where refunds were sent and the dollar amounts refunded with this visualization.

About the FTC

Our mission is protecting the public from deceptive or unfair business practices and from unfair methods of competition through law enforcement, advocacy, research, and education.

Learn more about the FTC

Meet the Chair

Lina M. Khan was sworn in as Chair of the Federal Trade Commission on June 15, 2021.

Chair Lina M. Khan

Looking for legal documents or records? Search the Legal Library instead.

• Cases and Proceedings
• Premerger Notification Program
• Merger Review
• Anticompetitive Practices
• Competition and Consumer Protection Guidance Documents
• Warning Letters
• Consumer Sentinel Network
• Criminal Liaison Unit
• FTC Refund Programs
• Notices of Penalty Offenses
• Advocacy and Research
• Advisory Opinions
• Cooperation Agreements
• Federal Register Notices
• Public Comments
• Policy Statements
• International
• Office of Technology Blog
• Military Consumer
• Consumer.gov
• Bulk Publications
• Data and Visualizations
• Stay Connected
• Commissioners and Staff
• Bureaus and Offices
• Budget and Strategy
• Office of Inspector General
• Careers at the FTC

Fact Sheet on FTC’s Proposed Final Noncompete Rule

• Competition
• Office of Policy Planning
• Bureau of Competition

The following outline provides a high-level overview of the FTC’s proposed final rule :

• Specifically, the final rule provides that it is an unfair method of competition—and therefore a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act—for employers to enter into noncompetes with workers after the effective date.
• Fewer than 1% of workers are estimated to be senior executives under the final rule.
• Specifically, the final rule defines the term “senior executive” to refer to workers earning more than $151,164 annually who are in a “policy-making position.”
• Reduced health care costs: $74-$194 billion in reduced spending on physician services over the next decade.
• New business formation: 2.7% increase in the rate of new firm formation, resulting in over 8,500 additional new businesses created each year.
• This reflects an estimated increase of about 3,000 to 5,000 new patents in the first year noncompetes are banned, rising to about 30,000-53,000 in the tenth year.
• This represents an estimated increase of 11-19% annually over a ten-year period.
• The average worker’s earnings will rise an estimated extra $524 per year. 

The Federal Trade Commission develops policy initiatives on issues that affect competition, consumers, and the U.S. economy. The FTC will never demand money, make threats, tell you to transfer money, or promise you a prize. Follow the  FTC on social media , read  consumer alerts  and the  business blog , and  sign up to get the latest FTC news and alerts .

Contact Information

Media contact.

Victoria Graham Office of Public Affairs 415-848-5121