vodafone idea case study

Vodafone Case Study

Introduction.

Vodafone Case study describes the situation when  Idea Cellular and Vodafone after the entrance of JIO. So, here is the Vodafone case study which describes the position of Vodafone and Idea Cellular before and post-merger, reasons for the merger, how did merger take place and critical analyses of the merger.

About Vodafone 

Vodafone company came from the UK based Vodafone Group plc. It is a multinational service provider of telecommunications in 22 different countries as of 20th November 2020. And, in India Vodafone has its headquarter in Mumbai, Maharashtra. Vodafone is the third largest telecommunication provider in the country. Vodafone

At the beginning of the year, 1992 Vodafone started its company in India from Bombay(now Mumbai). After the entry of JIO in the year 2016. Afterwards, our Vodafone case study begins, Vodafone and Idea announced their merger in March 2017. And as of 31st August 2018, it is known as Vodafone Idea Limited.

Vodafone Idea Merger Case Study

Vodafone case study explains the reason and the situation of the merger of Vodafone and Idea. This merger was first announced in March 2017. Afterwards, in July 2018, the department of telecommunication gave the approval for the merger. Finally, on 31st Aug 2018, the merger was completed and it is announced as Vodafone Idea Limited.

And this merger was the largest telecom merger in India. As per this merger, Vodafone holds a 45.2% stake, Aditya Birla Group holds 26% and the remaining stakes were held public. So, to understand the Vodafone case study, let’s understand the reasons for the Vodafone Idea merger case study.

Reasons For Vodafone Idea Merger

So, while understanding the Vodafone case study lets us understand the reason for the Vodafone Idea merger. 

• The main reason for the Vodafone-Idea merger is to Handel the rising dominance of Reliance Jio in the Telecom industry. As Jio announced to provide free services in the first 6 months. As a result, it started to capture the maximum part of the market.
• Secondly, the free services from the Jio started the price war between the companies in the telecom sector( as it in an oligopoly market structure ).
•  As a result in case of a price war merger brings confidence in companies with synergy benefits. 
• At last, the combined entity of Vodafone and Idea was expected to hold a strong position in the industry . Such as in some circles it became the largest cellular service provider and in some circle, it was the second-largest after Bharti Airtel. So, a joined company can focus on being the service provider in pan India.

So, these were the reasons in Vodafone case study for the merger of Vodafone and Idea.

Vodafone Idea Integration

According to the past in the telecom industry, major telephone operators believes the merger is a strong tool to be in the lead position. As Airtel acquires the Telenor, it acquires the scope and business from other small telecommunication companies like Augere Wireless, Videcon, Tikona(4G Spectrum) etc. 

Also, Reliance Communication (R Com) merged with Aircel and acquire MTC. Plus the Tata Telecom also started the process of merging with R Com. As a result in a period of seven months telephone operators numbers went down to seven from twelve.

However, the announcement of the merger creates a negative image in the public, when the Vodafone and Idea merger was announced the Idea prices started to drop . And the share price of Idea declines from Rs. 97.70 on 20th March 2017 to Rs. 81.81 on 6th Sep 2017.

But the merger was important it gave support to the two companies, which were struggling to survive in the industry. Combined resources will help to compete with only the two biggest brands(Jio and Airtel).

So, these were the challenges of Vodafone and Idea merger in case of Vodafone case study.

Critical Analysis Of Vodafone Case

The merger of Vodafone and Idea in Vodafone case study gave higher stakes to the Idea promoters as compared to Vodafone. So, in long run, both companies can gain access to equal shares in the future. 

Here are the few takeaways from the Vodafone Idea merger in Vodafone case study: 

• The very first thing was the acquisition of 4.9 per cent shares of Vodafone by Aditya Birla . This would amount to a total of Rs. 3874 crore wherein each share is worth Rs. 108 . This would be helpful in increasing the shareholding capacity of Idea to 26 per cent .
• While in the case of Vodafone case study, Vodafone holds 45.1 per cent of the shares in the merger, Idea would be allowed to buy another 9.6 per cent but at a cost of Rs. 130 per share in the period spread over the next four years. However, if Idea is unable to come up equal to the shareholding percentage of Vodafone, it can go forward and buy the number of shares required further but at the price prevailing in the market.
• And, the chairperson of the newly formed enterprise would be Kumar Mangalam Birla . On the other hand, Vodafone had appointed the Chief financial officer . As, after that new CEO was named under both the companies.
• Lastly, the promotors of both entities have the right to nominate three members for the board . Also, there are 12 members out of which 6 are independent on the board in the Vodafone case study of Vodafone and Idea merger. 

Idea Positioning Before Merger

In Vodafone case study of Vodafone and Idea merger, now lets understand the Idea Cellular Limited is an Aditya Birla Group company. Founded in 1995, the company was incorporated as Birla Communications Limited and had a license of GSM-based services in Gujarat and Maharashtra Circle. In the following years, the organization started to expand its business with Tata Group, Birla and AT&T group of the US in joint venture form. 

In August 2015, Idea announced the rollout of its 4G services. It was now competing with Airtel and Vodafone – in a non-monopolistic market. The company relaunched its “What an Idea” campaign taking 4G to the rural areas and empowering people through the usage of 4G services.

But in the year 2016 sudden announcement from Mukesh Ambani about Reliance Jio disrupted the Indian telecom sector. Below pie chart shows the market share of different telecom players before the entry of Jio.

As the Indian market is very sensitive towards price and Jio used it to make most of the profits. So, Jio started to make its all services free for the first six months. Afterwards, they made the services of voice calls, data extremely cheap. As a result, JIO captured a significant share of the telecom industry. Here is the pie chart of the post-Jio market share of various telecom players.

Vodafone Idea Merger

This transaction required various approvals from government authorities including SEBI, dept. of Telecom and Reserve Bank of India among others. The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has given the green signal for the merger of Vodafone India and Idea in our Vodafone case study, the largest Merger and Acquisition agreement in the sector, which has displaced Bharti Airtel from top position after over 15 years. The approval conditions, which were given over a year after the agreement, were announced in March 2017 which included an advance payment of Rs 7,268 crore. 

Idea Contributon

Promoters Aditya Birla Group infused Rs 3,250 crore in Idea Cellular , which separately raised Rs 3,000 crore ahead of a planned merger with Vodafone India. Following the equity infusion by Idea’s promoters, their stake in India’s third-largest telecom operator rose to 47.2% from 42.4% now. Idea contributed its assets which included standalone towers with 15,400 tenancies and a stake in Indus towers Ltd of 11.5%. 

The entry of Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd in September 2016, with free services for almost seven months and cheap tariffs, had eroded margins and impacted the revenue of rivals. The contribution of Vodafone will be Vodafone India along with standalone towers with 15,400 tenancies without including an 11.5% stake in Indus Towers. According to the agreement between Idea and Vodafone.

Vodafone will contribute more amount of net debt, about Rs 2,480 crore than Idea at the completion of the merger. Post-termination of both companies, the combined entity will be a joint venture between Vodafone and Idea in the Vodafone case study. Which will account for the under the equity method, controlled by both Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone.

Idea promoters hold the rights to acquire a 9.5% additional stake from Vodafone under the agreed deal to equalize shareholdings over time as per the following proposition

Vodafone: 45.1% – 9.5% = 35.6%

Idea: 26% + 9.5% = 35.6%

Impact of Merger on Telecom Industry

There are also several other implications that this merger of Vodafone case study will bring forth on the telecom industry.

1. Firstly, there can be initiatives based on the renewal of price discipline for the disruptive entry by Jio has caused some serious misbalance

2. Secondly, the poor financial health of the telecom sector can be observed. And through such mergers, there will be an infusion of health and life. Since India is the fastest-growing market in terms of subscriber base .

3. Through the merger, Vodafone and Idea will overcome their debts and a large sum of credit will be infused into the system

4. The deal has also saved both the telecom companies from selling off their business . As was being planned by them initially and this would directly impact the quality of services being provided by different players in the industry

The merger in the Vodafone case study will surely boost the pace of the telecom sector. It has also been found that the savings, synergies and also the spectrum will have a substantial impact on the escalating growth. 

There will be a saving of over 60 per cent of the cost of the operation and this will aid in improving the quality and performance of the service through investments from the saved money.

Enhancement in network infrastructure will be observed while the operational efficiencies have a chance to reach excellence. Moreover, the revenue market share is expected to rise for all the locations and the spectrum of the entity would exceed the initial caps.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

MAKING LAW SIMPLE!

Mergers and Acquisitions: Case Study of Vodafone Idea Merger

By: Vaidehi Sharma

Introduction to mergers and acquisition  

‘Mergers and acquisitions’ is a technical term used to define the consolidation of two or more companies. When two companies are combined to form one unit, it is known as a merger, while an acquisition refers to the buying of one company by another one, which means that no new company is formed, only one company has been absorbed into another. Mergers and Acquisitions are an important component of strategic management, which comes under the head of corporate finance. The subject concerns buying, selling, dividing, and combining various companies. It is a  type of restructuring to have rapid growth and increase profitability. 

Mergers and acquisitions are part of the strategic working of any business or working group. It involves the joining of two businesses with the object to increase market share and profits and to have an influential impact on the industry. Mergers and Acquisitions are complicated processes that require preparation, analysis, and deliberation. There are a lot of parties who might be affected by a merger or an acquisition but before a deal is finalized, all parties need to be taken into consideration, their concerns should be addressed, and all possible hurdles that can be avoided must be avoided. 

The term ‘Merger’ has not been defined under the Companies Act, 2013 or  Income Tax Act, 1961 , but as a concept ‘merger’ is a combination of two or more entities into one; with the accumulation of their assets and liabilities, and coming together of the entities into one business. 

The other word for Merger is ‘Amalgamation’. Under The Income Tax Act, 1961  (ITA) ‘amalgamation’ is defined as the merger of one or more entities with another company, or the merger of two or more entities forming one company. It also mentions other conditions to be satisfied for an ‘Amalgamation’ to benefit from the beneficial tax treatment. 

For example -A company called and a company called B merge to form a new company called C . This is called a merger. 

The effect of the merger is that the assets and liabilities of both companies will now be shared and they will cease to exist as independent companies . 

Benefits of Mergers 

⮚ Profit and resource sharing – The resources of both companies are pooled together which increases the profit outcome.

⮚ Access to New Markets – Entering into new markets can be challenging for any company even for established companies. While setting up a subsidiary  or branch is always an option, a merger or acquisition can save companies a  significant amount of time, effort, and money compared to starting from  scratch  

⮚ More Economic Strength and Competitive Edge – mergers and acquisitions mean financial strength for both companies. It can help them to become more powerful in the market, attract more customers and create more resources. 

⮚ Powerful Human Resource -The biggest asset any company can hold is its employees. A skilled and effective stall generates a lot of profit for the company. Therefore in mergers and acquisitions, the human resources of both companies are pooled together. 

⮚ Better infrastructure and Fixed Capital -In mergers and acquisitions the resources of both companies are shared which means access to better infrastructure for the poor company. Big machines and other resources can also be used up for better production. 

Mergers and acquisitions in the telecom industry in India 

Introduction  .

India is currently ranked as the world’s second-largest telecommunications market with more than 1.20 billion subscribers and has shown strong growth in the past one and a half decades. 

The Indian telecom industry is growing at a rapid pace. In 2020-2021 the telecom industry contributed 6% to India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The telecom  sector is set to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9.4% from  

2020 to 2025. However, with a CAGR of 15.9% throughout the forecast period, the smartphone industry in India will have the fastest growth. By 2025, India’s digital economy will be worth $ 1 trillion. 

The industry has increased primarily due to favorable regulatory conditions, low prices, increased accessibility, and the introduction of Mobile Number Portability  (MNP), expanding 3G and 4G coverage, and changing subscriber consumption patterns. The deregulation of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) rules has made the telecom sector one of the fastest-growing sectors in the country and a huge means of employment opportunity generator in the country too.

The subsectors of the telecommunication sector include infrastructure, equipment,  Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MNVO), white space spectrum, 5G, telephone service providers, and broadband. 

It is predicted that 5G technology will boost the Indian economy by $ 450 Bn between 2023 and 2040. According to the Global System for Mobile  Communications (GSMA), there is an excellent opportunity for investment in this sector as India will have almost one billion installed smartphones by 2025 and 920  million unique mobile customers, including 88 million 5G connections. 

Importance of the telecom industry  

The importance of the telecommunication industry is highlighted by the fact that it enables global communication. The relevance of this industry has increased significantly after the pandemic. Services offered by this industry are more frequently used since it allows for a continued virtual connection. The smartphone market will continue to increase as more people are expected to purchase them in the coming years. Given that government reforms have eliminated ambiguity and risks and established a stable investment environment, India’s telecom sector is projected to receive investments totaling $ 25.2 Bn over the next two years. 

Mergers and acquisitions in the telecom industry  

The recent trend of mergers and acquisitions can be widely seen in the telecom sector too. This recent trend in the world of the telecommunications market has been caused by the ongoing regulatory liberalization and privatization of the industry.  These changes have brought about fierce competition and ensuing decreases in profit in both the domestic and international telecommunications service markets. 

Mergers and acquisitions in the telecom sector are considered to be horizontal mergers because both companies deal in the same line of business. In the majority of developed and developing countries, mergers and acquisitions in the telecommunications sector have increased which also resulted in the creation of jobs. 

The legal Framework of Mergers and Acquisitions in the telecom sector  

• ⮚ National Telecom Policy formed in 2012 hasimplifiedde M&A in Telecom  Service Sect, ensuring adequate competition and allowing  100% FDI.
• ⮚ The merger in the case of licenses shall be done for the respective service category. Access to service license allows the provision of internet service and so the merger of ISP license with services license shall also be  
• permitted. 
• ⮚ In a service area, the market share of the merged entity should not be more than 50%. If it is more, it has to reduce it below 50% in an annum. 
• ⮚ The total spectrum held by the merged entity should not be more than 50%  in a service area. If it is excess, it has to be surrendered within an annum. 
• ⮚ The corporation which acquires will have to pay the difference between the market price determined in the auction & the administrative price if an acquired company has got spectrum after paying the administrative price. 
• ⮚ If due to a merger or transfer of license in any service area business,  corporation or entity becomes an important market power, then TRAI’s  Telecommunication Act of the year 2002 will come into place. 

Case study – Merger of Vodafone and Idea 

History of both the companies  , history of the merger  .

In March 2017, it was announced that Idea Cellular and Vodafone India would merge. The merger got approval from the Department of Telecommunications in July 2018. On 30 August 2018, National Company Law Tribunal gave the final nod to the Vodafone-Idea merger. It was completed on 31 August 2018, and the new entity was named Vodafone Idea Limited. Under the terms of the deal, the  

Vodafone Group held a 45.2% stake in the combined entity, the Aditya Birla  Group held 26% and the remaining shares were to be held by the public. 

Reasons for Merger of Vodafone and Idea   

Dominance over the market by JIO- The main reason for the merger of Vodafone and the idea was the dominance of the Jio company. The companies saw a major downfall as Jio announced free internet services for the first 6 months. As a result price war began between companies. the companies began to see losses, and as a result, a merger between Vodafone and Idea happened. 

Key takeaways  

• ⮚ Under the plan submitted to Indian regulators, Vodafone will initially hold a  50 0% stake in the combined entity, while the Aditya Birla Group and public shareholders will hold 21.1% and 28.9%, respectively. Vodafone will then divest a 4.9% stake to the Aditya Birla Group, which would increase the latter’s stake from 21.1% to 26%, thus crossing the threshold for an open offer. 
• ⮚ Vodafone and Idea had individual spectrum holdings of 411 MHz and 316  MHz respectively. The amalgamation of the companies would give, it was expected, the merged company a hold of 728 Mhz increasing the chances of the merged company to rank number one or two in India. 
• ⮚ The merger ratio was 1:1. This ratio was based on the price of Idea at 72.5  per unit. Implied enterprise value for Idea and Vodafone was INR 72  thousand crores and INR 82 thousand and 8 hundred crores respectively.  The agreement had a break fee of Rs 3,300 crore payable upon certain conditions. 
• ⮚ Aditya Birla also has the right to acquire up to 9.5% additional shareholding from Vodafone Group throughout three years post-closure of the deal for an agreed price of INR 130 per share. But these rights by Aditya Group will be exercised based on the growth achieved and the market price of the combined entity .
• ⮚ Idea and Vodafone will have joint control over the appointment of CEO and  COO, the exclusive rights to appoint a CFO is with Vodafone. So Vodafone is not just a major shareholder but also has more financial rights. 
• ⮚ If at the end of 3 years, Aditya Birla Group fails to purchase any stakeout of the additional stake of 9.5%, then they will be given the last opportunity to purchase the stake at the prevailing market price for share equalization. 
• ⮚ Vodafone contributed net debt of Rs 55,200 crore to the merged entity,  whereas Idea contributed Rs. 52,700 crore. Vodafone contributed net debt of Rs. 2,500 crore more than Idea . 
• ⮚ In September 2020, Vodafone – Idea rebranded itself. The company used the initials to rebrand itself as ‘Vi’. The rebranding took place after almost two years of the merger, however, it shows the spirit of integration. 
• ⮚ In the financial year 2022, Vodafone Idea Limited earned revenue of 386.5  billion Indian rupees.

Related Posts

Fast track special courts: ending the pending.

Fast Track Courts are advisory institutions established to cope with a specific sort of issue, such as advisory courts established to handle with cases that involve sexual harassment or POSCO, for instance.

Kerala HC on the definition of rape in the recent judgment

According to the news agency that was trending at the PTI, a divisional court of the Kerala high court did extend the definition of the term rape, saying that any type of non-penetrative sexual act which is between a victim’s thighs that produces a sensation similar to penetration will also be considered rape.

Stolen Property: Provisions of getting back

Introduction Chapter XVII of the Indian penal code discussed about the offences against property. This is the second longest chapter, it contains 85 sections (378- 462). The basic element common to the offences under this chapter is dishonesty, which the code is describes as the intention of causing wrongful gain…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• 223 Share on Instagram
• 211 Share on Facebook
• 201 Share on LinkedIn

With a population of 1.38 billion people, India has one of the largest telecom markets in the world. Up until 2016, there were more than a dozen telecom service providers operating in the country.

But in 2016, a new provider entered the marketplace, causing major disruption to the telecom market and triggering massive changes, including increased competition and price wars.

To adapt to these changes, two of the top telecom providers in the country—Vodafone India and Idea Cellular—decided to merge to become Vodafone Idea Limited (Vi). According to Vineet Chauhan, Vice President and Head of Digital Technology at Vi, the two businesses decided to embrace the market changes. “It was a great opportunity to serve more and more customers through our ever-improving network, best-in-class data speeds, and great products and services,” he says.

A merger of this size was unprecedented. The two companies needed to consolidate without significantly disrupting operations or service to customers. At the same time, Vi wanted to execute on its vision of becoming a digital-first company.

Rapid growth

A new digital retailer app platform adds 7 million subscribers per month

Revenue management

The digital retailer app is used to manage revenue of USD 200 million each month

Vi had a long history with IBM, so it turned to IBM® Consulting to help plan and execute its massive digital transformation and its consolidation and integration projects. “We partnered with IBM to drive digital transformation at the scale that we needed to,” says Chauhan. “And in this partnership with IBM, our three pillars are trust, transparency and agility.”

A key component for the merger was digital transformation. “We set out to transform ourselves,” says Chauhan. “As a digital-first organization, we wanted to make sure that we delight consumers at every touchpoint, every time. We have the kind of products and offerings that are innovative, personalized, contextual and relevant.”

Working alongside IBM, Vi created a “digital factory” to help transform the various Vi digital properties, including websites, mobile apps and new digital platforms. As it rolled out the new Vi brand, the company launched these new websites and mobile apps during the day with zero downtime. “Our consumers use the website for information, to subscribe or to recharge their prepaid phone,” says Chauhan. “Our postpaid subscribers come and make a bill payment. And we can present exciting offers. So, we turned all these functions around and we were seamlessly able to transition into the new brand.”

The digital transformation enabled new digital platforms for Vi’s channel partners. Vi worked collaboratively with IBM in the digital factory to launch several first-of-a-kind solutions, such as a new digital retailer mobile app platform supporting contactless recharges and contactless UPI-based balance transfers. Using the digital retailer app, customers can recharge their prepaid phone easily while maintaining the social distancing required for COVID-19 safety. In addition, distributors can make contactless UPI-based balance transfers, so retailers can always get the recharges they need without requiring representatives to travel to retail locations.

These initiatives help some 300 million Indian citizens stay connected, without any issues, during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the new digital retailer app, Vi is gaining seven million new subscribers per month and managing monthly revenue of USD 200 million. Plus, the company launched a new digital sales acquisition platform, driving a 100% increase in digital acquisitions in three months.

Nirupmay Kumar, Executive Vice President of Technology at Vi, oversaw integration strategy, solution design and demand management for enterprise and consumer business during the consolidation and integration projects. “We interacted very closely with IBM to identify our business requirements and to determine how to design the systems,” says Kumar. “IBM also helped us detail all of our requirements to make sure that nothing was missed.”

Kumar and his team handled the job of consolidation design of the IT systems from both Vodafone and Idea. “So the challenge was how to identify the right set of applications that can support double the subscriber base, along with future growth and functionalities,” says Kumar. This was no easy task, considering the size and IT landscape maturity of the two companies. “IT Transformation project for a telecom company is like changing the engine while the flight is in the air, you have to upgrade with minimal or no downtime” says Kumar.

As Kumar and his team worked with IBM to determine which enterprise applications could best support the newly merged organization, they found at times that the best choice was to transform an existing system rather than consolidating. And in some cases they created new functionality. In the past, neither company had a digital platform for the enterprise consumer, so Vi and IBM created a new digital platform to provide self-service options to Vi enterprise customers. In fact, the Vi enterprise digital platform won five awards at the prestigious ICMG Architecture Excellence Awards competition. The new enterprise digital platform has delivered a 35% increase in payments, a 60% growth in customer self-servicing and a 70% rise in new customer registrations in one year.

Sanjeev Vadera, Vice President and Head of Integration Program Management at Vi, handled consolidation and operations for the consolidation and integration projects. Part of the consolidation program involved moving many applications and services to a virtualized cloud to reduce the cost of ownership. “In the back of our minds, we were always looking for ways to move to the cloud as much as possible,” says Vadera. “We did a lot of virtualization as well.” The IBM and Vi team successfully executed 32 parallel transformation programs within just 18 months. These projects impacted nearly 300 million customers (or approximately one in every four Indian citizens) and two million channel partners across more than 700 business processes.

Although the consolidation and integration program was originally projected to take three to five years, Vi was able to complete it within 24 months with help from IBM. The company also completed the digital transformation with minimal impact on its consumers. “For the majority of our consolidation projects, we ensured that there was zero customer impact,” says Vadera. “With IBM’s help, we did iterations of mock migrations to create the strategies for how we can reduce downtime.”

In total, Vi and IBM consolidated more than 350 applications down to approximately 200. In addition, the teams migrated 140 applications from three data centers to one data center. Ultimately, the project will result in the consolidation of four data centers into one. Through this consolidation, Vi has saved USD 600 million so far.

In addition, IBM is helping Vi with its network domains. Vi collaborated with IBM to deliver its first major production milestone for core network functions on its open universal hybrid cloud, powered by IBM and Red Hat. The platform enables IT and network applications to run on a common cloud architecture, which is designed to deliver ROI improvements through the optimization of CapEx, OpEx, skills and automation investments across both the network and IT application domains. The hybrid cloud is based on open technology and open standards from IBM and Red Hat, and it delivers a wide range of capabilities, including IBM Watson® AI and the Red Hat® Ansible® Automation Platform (link resides outside ibm.com), which can help strengthen Vi’s capability in network and IT planning.

Vadera and his team also teamed with IBM to implement the Big Data Lake program at Vi. The Big Data Lake program is one of the biggest open-source-based data lakes implemented globally in a telecom company. “The business analytics and intelligence needs for the new company needed to be very different from the existing tools and applications used by Vodafone and Idea, so we decided build a completely new system,” says Vadera.

The launch of the new Big Data Lake data platform has delivered significant value to Vi. “The program has brought immense business benefits to Vi, with close to a 40% cost reduction and a 60% reduction in operational complexity,” says Aditya Ghosh, Associate Vice President of IT for Analytics at Vi. “We’re going to be ahead of the curve with a future-ready, modern and open-source platform.”

The new data platform, which replaced two existing data warehouse platforms, processes over 15 billion records per day, creating more than 2,000 business KPIs daily. The data lake is a massive 10-petabyte platform. It’s helping Vi take the next big step into the AI domain, with the implementation of major AI- and machine-learning-related use cases for network experience improvements, new planning and customer experience improvement.

According to Himanshu Jain, Senior Vice President at Vi, the partnership with IBM was key to the success of the project. “IBM brings robust governance framework, agility to scale up and domain expertise to the table,” he says. “And IBM has really helped us digitize our organization during challenging times due to COVID-19.”

Vi anticipates that it will continue to work with IBM to achieve its goals. “Now we have a very strong platform that we can use as a springboard for more innovation, more features,” says Kumar. “Our relationship with IBM is growing day by day, and I look forward to working with IBM as a trusted partner for many years to come.”

Vi  (link resides outside of ibm.com) is one of the leading telecom providers in India. The company serves approximately 300 million subscribers across more than 480,000 towns and villages throughout India. In addition to having the largest telecom network in India, Vi provides pan-India voice and data services across 2G, 3G and 4G platforms. It is headquartered in Mumbai and Gandhinagar and reported revenue of USD 6.4 billion in 2020.

To learn more about the IBM solutions featured in this story, please contact your IBM representative or IBM Business Partner.

© Copyright IBM Corporation 2021. IBM Corporation, IBM Consulting, Orchard Road, Armonk, NY 10504

Produced in the United States of America, June 2021.

IBM, the IBM logo, ibm.com, and IBM Watson are trademarks of International Business Machines Corp., registered in many jurisdictions worldwide. Other product and service names e trademarks of IBM or other companies. A current list of IBM trademarks is available on the web at “Copyright and trademark information” at  ibm.com/legal/copyright-trademark .

Red Hat® and Ansible® are trademarks or registered trademarks of Red Hat, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.

This document is current as of the initial date of publication and may be changed by IBM at any time. Not all offerings are available in every country in which IBM operates.

The performance data and client examples cited are presented for illustrative purposes only. Actual performance results may vary depending on specific configurations and operating conditions. THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ANY WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF NON-INFRINGEMENT. IBM products are warranted according to the terms and conditions of the agreements under which they are provided.

A Study of Merger and Acquisition and Its Impact on Profitability Performance of Selected Merger (With Reference to Vodafone Idea Merger)

• First Online: 23 August 2022

Cite this chapter

• Suruchi Satsangi 12 &
• Prem Das Saini 12  

Part of the book series: Flexible Systems Management ((FLEXSYS))

491 Accesses

Mergers and acquisitions are vital choices taken to boost an endeavor's blast through improving its assembling and promoting tasks. They are adopted to use and gain advantage power, expand the purchaser base, cut competition or enter into a brand new market or product section. When globalization of the Indian financial system was started in 1991, it was believed that it would suggest foreigners were not the handiest doing enterprise in India but additionally taking over Indian organizations. The objectives are to review the case of Vodafone-Idea related to M&As and analyzing its before- & after- performance of the company and its impact on the basis of profitability performance of the selected companies. The study is based on an analytical research. The data are taken from secondary sources from several websites. The time period of the study is two-year pre & two-year post of the selected companies. The base year is considered as zero. To analyze the profitability performance, ratios and t test has been used as a tool for further analysis of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bedi, A. (2018). Post acquisition performance of indian telecom companies: An empirical study. Pacific Business Review International , 56–62.

Google Scholar  

Jiang, J. (2019 ). An empirical study on M&A performance: evidence from horizontal mergers and acquisitions in the United States. Open Journal of Business and Management , 976–997.

Poddar, N. (2019). A study on mergers and acquisition in india and its impact on operating efficiency of indian acquiring company. Theoretical Economics Letters , 1040–1052.

Satyanarayana, D., Rao, D., & Naidu , D. (2017). The impact of reliance jio on Indian mobile industry a case study on mergers and acquisitions of idea—Vodafone and Airtel—Telenor. International Journal of Applied Research , 209–212.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Accountancy and Law, Faculty of Commerce, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, 282005, India

Suruchi Satsangi & Prem Das Saini

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suruchi Satsangi .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

Ramesh Anbanandam

Santosh Rangnekar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Satsangi, S., Das Saini, P. (2022). A Study of Merger and Acquisition and Its Impact on Profitability Performance of Selected Merger (With Reference to Vodafone Idea Merger). In: Anbanandam, R., Rangnekar, S. (eds) Flexibility, Innovation, and Sustainable Business. Flexible Systems Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1697-7_12

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1697-7_12

Published : 23 August 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-19-1696-0

Online ISBN : 978-981-19-1697-7

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• +91- 9640901313 [email protected]
• Search for a Case
• Press Release

• Case Studies

Vodafone Idea Limited - Profitability Analysis

Vodafone Idea Limited (VIL), the third largest telecom company in India in terms of subscriber base, has been facing challenges despite having significant growth opportunities. These challenges include regulatory challenges, the policy environment, pricing challenges, and intense competition. As a result, the company’s revenues declined and operating costs increased, leading to decline in its profitability margins. At one point of time, the management of both Vodafone India Limited and Idea Cellular Limited were about to sell their stakes due to the mounting losses of the company. However, some policy and regulatory relief provided by the Government of India have offered a ray of hope to the embattled telecom company. Relief on Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) payment dues for a period of 4 years and financial support from the Department of Telecom (DoT) are expected to provide some respite to all telecom operators, including VIL. Also, the market has been witnessing some improvement in Average Revenue Per User (ARPU). With the leeway provided by the DoT, telecom operators have been gearing up to improve their market share in terms of subscriber base and APRU. The target ARPU to be achieved by the end of year 2022 has been placed at Rs. 200 by leading telecom operator Airtel. The management of VIL has also been looking forward to managing its operating activities and to raising additional financing to improve network coverage and accessibility and is looking at rolling out 5G services along with other competitors during the financial year 2022-23. All the market factors and the Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD) Indicator are in favor of VIL. The present case study provides scope for discussing the concept of profitability of a company having negative profits from an investment perspective, and also the scope for discussing the concept of MACD. It also discusses how to interpret the stock trading information using the MACD indicator.

• Ratio analysis as a tool of financial statement analysis.
• Profitability ratios used in the profitability analysis of a company.
• Analysis and interpretation of the profitability position of a company having negative profit margins.
• The concept of Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD).
• Turnaround strategy of the company (through an initial reduction/managing of operating costs and/or assuming that VIL can generate more capital expenditure in future).

Profitability Analysis; Net profit ratio; Operating Expenses ratio; Return on Assets; Return on Capital Employed; Return on Equity; Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD); Vodafone Idea Limited; Average Revenue Per User; Adjusted Gross Revenue; Spectrum Usage Charges

Buy this case study (Please select any one of the payment options)

Copyright © 2020 - 2025 All Rights Reserved - icmrindia.org

• Submit Post
• Union Budget 2024

Vodafone Case Analysis

Introduction

Vodafone’s journey in India has been a significant case in retrospective amendment made to tax laws. The decision made by the Supreme Court in this case and subsequently the decision made by PCA in Cairn UK case following Vodafone case amounts to a huge loss to the government as the reserve of the government depends upon the collection of tax. Tax avoidance has become a common practice today. Tax avoidance is considered as “legitimate tax planning”. Only after this case, strict provisions to govern tax evasion by non-resident companies through indirect transfers were made. Agreeing to the fact that there must be liberal tax policies in order to attract foreign investment, India need not stoop down too low to attract FDI. Moreover, tax laws in the country must be stabilized and strong tax laws must be enacted to cover these types of transactions in order to help the government. This case is a learning experience to know about indirect transfer of assets, taxability of capital gains, retrospective amendments to tax laws and clarity of tax laws in the country. Though various amendments to tax laws have been made, it has been a continuous defeat to the country regarding these offshore transfers.  This is a landmark judgment pronounced by the Supreme Court of India. It was a 3-judge bench decision consisting of Chief justice S.H Kapadia, Swatanter Kumar and K.S. Radha Krishnan. The case was originally dealt by the Bombay HC.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance and Anr. EQUIVALENT CITATION: 2009(4) BomCR258, (2008)220CTR(Bom)649

Vodafone International Holdings (VIH), a Dutch Company procured 100% shares in CGP Investments (Holding) Ltd a company situated in Cayman Island, for USD 11.1 billion from Hutchison Telecommunications International Ltd in the year 2007. CGP, through different organizations and actions controlled 67% of Hutchison Essar Limited (HEL), an Indian Company. Vodafone got command over CGP and its downstream the subsidiaries including HEL through the acquisition. It had acquired telecom licenses to give cell communication in various circles in India starting from November 1994. In September 2007, a show-cause notice was given to the Vodafone Company by the Indian Tax Department to clarify the reason for why tax was not retained on instalments made to HTIL in connection to the above said transaction as said transaction of transfer of shares in CGP had an impact of aberrant or indirect transfer of assets in India. 3

Whether the transfer of shares between two foreign companies, resulting in extinguishment of controlling interest in the Indian Company held by a foreign company, amounted to transfer of capital assets in India and whether such transaction is chargeable to tax in India?

Sec 2(14) of Income Tax Act-Capital Asset

Sec 2(24) of Income Tax Act- Definition of Income Sec 5 of Income Tax Act-Scope of total income

Sec 9 of Income Tax Act- Income deemed to accrue or arise in India Sec 45 of Income Tax Act-Capital gains

Sec 191 of Income Tax Act-Direct Payment Sec 195 of Income Tax Act-Other sums

Sec 201 of Income Tax Act-Consequences of failure to deduct or pay

MAINTAINABILITY

The respondent contended that the writ petition is not maintainable because the petitioner had an effective alternative remedy available under Income Tax Act. 4 The petitioner cannot invoke the writ jurisdiction as there is a failure on part of the petitioner as they did not invoke the jurisdiction under tax law. It was held that where a statute creates a right or liability and gives a special remedy when enforced, the remedy provided by that statute only must be availed of. In the present case, the Act provides for a complete machinery to challenge an Order of assessment, therefor the order can only be challenged by the mode prescribed by the Act and not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY

The respondent contended that the petitioner has not produced the important documents that are essential for determination of tax charges in India and thereby, the petitioner cannot challenge validity of provisions in issue. It was held that even if the burden of proof does not lie on a party, the Court may draw an adverse inference if he withholds important documents in his possession which can throw light on the facts at issue. 5 Therefore, when the Petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of the Amendment to Sections 191 and 201 of the

I.T. Act by the Finance Act, 2008, then the same must be in context of certain facts pleaded and proved by evidence in the form of documents on record and not in vacuum or in the abstract.

Section 9 of the Act provides the formal source rule which provides for taxing gains that arise from the transfer of capital assets that are in India. In this case, Hutchison’s gain arose from the sale of shares of CGP, a capital asset located in Cayman Islands. Therefore Hutchison’s gain was not chargeable to tax in India; thereby, Vodafone BV in not required deducting tax at source under the Act.

Chapter X of the Act does not provide to tax all amounts involved in a particular transaction, which are otherwise not taxable. Before bringing any transaction for charging tax, a taxable income must arise. Therefore ordering to pay tax to amounts involved in International Transaction tantamount to imposing a penalty for entering into a transaction as no taxable income has been incurred.

It emphasized that the law restricted the courts from imposing tax liabilities on the basis of economic substance of the transaction. The legal form of the transaction was that Hutchison had transferred shares of a Cayman Island company. Since, the shares were situated in Cayman Islands, the “formal source rule” failed to capture the Hutchison gains in India’s tax net. To sum it up, Petitioner simply argued that it was not legally right to hold that Hutchison gains were taxable in India.

The issue of shares by the Vodafone to its holding company and receipt of consideration of the same is a capital receipt under the Act 6 . Capital receipts cannot be brought to tax unless specifically/ expressly brought to tax by the Act 7 . It is well settled that capital receipts do not come within the ambit of the word ‘Income’ under the Act, save when so expressly provided as in the case of Section 2 (24) (vi) of the Act. This brings capital gains chargeable under Section 45 of the Act, to tax within the meaning of the word ‘Income’. 8

In this case, attention was drawn to the definition of `Income’ 9 in the Act which includes in its scope amounts received arising or accruing within the provisions of section 56(2) (vii)(b) of the Act. The definition applies to issue of shares to a resident in India. This order relies on the meaning of International Transaction provided in Explanation (i) to Section 92B of the Act. It is submitted that Explanation (i) to Section 92B of the Act only states that capital financing transaction such as borrowing money and/or lending money to AE would be an International Transaction. However, what is brought to tax is not the quantum of amount lent and/or borrowed but the impact on Income due to such lending or borrowing. Similarly, Explanation to Section 92B of the Act, which covers business restructuring, would only have application if said restructuring/ reorganizing impacts income. If there is any impact of income on account of business restructuring/reorganizing, then such income would be subjected to tax as and when it arises whether in present or in future. 10 In this case, such a contingency does not arise as there is no impact on Income which would be chargeable to tax due to issue of shares. 11

The issue of Chapter X of the Act being applicable is no longer an untouched matter because similar provision as provided in Section 92 of the Act was also provided under Section 42(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1922. The Supreme Court held that the action of revenue in seeking to tax a resident in respect of profit which he would have normally made but did not make because of his close association with a non-resident. It observed that it is open to charge tax on notional profits and impose charge on the resident. 12 The aforesaid provision of Section 42(2) of the 1922 Act was incorporated in its new avtar as Section 92 of the said Act. It was thus emphasized that the legislative history supports the stand of the respondent-revenue that even in the absence of actual income, a notional income can be brought to tax. 13

Section 92(1) of the Act uses the word ‘Any income arising from an International Transaction’. Accordingly, we see that, the income of any party to the transaction could be subject matter to charge tax and it does not provide that the income of resident only is taxable. In case of Chapter X of the Act, the matter of real income concept has no applicability. Therefore, the difference between ALP and the contracted price would be added to the total Income.

Chapter X of the Act is a complete code by itself and not merely a machinery provision to compute the ALP 14 . Chapter X of the Act applies wherever the ALP is to be determined by the A.O 15 . The Petitioner itself had submitted to the jurisdiction of Chapter X of the Act by filing/submitting Form 3-CEB, declaring the ALP 16 . It is the hidden benefit in the transaction which is being charged to tax. Therefore, the charging section is inherent in Chapter X of the Act.

OBSERVATION

No express legislation on capital account transaction:

Section 92(1) of the Act states that an income from an international transaction is a condition precedent for the applicability of Chapter X. The meaning of income will not include capital receipts unless it is specifically mentioned as provided in Section 2(24)(vi) of the Act. So, capital gains to be taxed under Section 45 of the Act are deemed to be income under the Act.

Income pre requisite for applicability of Section 56(1):

For application of Section 56 of the Act , an income must arise which can be taxed. Issuing of shares at a premium is on capital account gives rise to no income.

Charge and measure of tax entirely different:

The tax can be charged only on income and in the absence of any income arising, the application of the measure of ALP to the transfer value does not arise. Chapter X of the Act provides that a transaction can be taxed only after working out the income after finding the ALP of a transaction.

No relevance of Section 92(2) in the present case:  

Section 92(2) of the Act deals with a situation where two or more AEs enter into an arrangement whereby they are to receive any benefit, service or facility. This provision is not applicable in this case as there is no situation where there is no allocation of any cost or expense between the petitioner and the holding company.

The transaction entered by the Petitioner amounts to transfer of a capital asset and not a transfer of controlling interest ipso facto in a corporate entity and is chargeable to tax in India.

It was held that any profit or gain arising from the transfer of a company in India has to be considered as a profit and gains of the company which actually owns and controls it. In this case, the income from the transfer is accrued by the HTIL and not Cayman Island Company (CGP). Therefore, the recipient was HTIL. Therefore the interest of the recipient is divested to the petitioner and hence is liable for capital gains tax.

The Effects Doctrine Extra-territorial operation of Section 195 of the I.T Act provides that any state may impose liabilities, even upon persons not within its territory, for conduct outside its borders that has consequences within the borders of its state. Hence, the dominant purpose of entering into agreement by the two foreign companies is to acquire the substantial interest and of which one foreign company is held in the Indian company the municipal laws of the country would be applicable and hence Indian Tax laws will be applied.

If the Hutchison gains were held not to be taxed in India, India would forfeit its right to tax as the country of source. Thereby the taxpayers will try to exploit the unintended loopholes in India’s tax law.

If the Hutchison gains were held taxable in India it would fortify India’s taxing rights as a source country- if you earn value from India, you shall be taxed in India. The entire value earned by HTIL “was only on account of the fruits of the investment made by HTIL in India, goodwill/brand value generated by HTIL for the Hutch brand in India, the telecom licenses granted in India, customer base in India and the prospect of future development and expansion in India 17 .” In the context of capital gains on company’s shares, the settled legal principle is that shares are located where the company’s share register is maintained, normally the place of its incorporation 18 . Rendering Hutchison gains taxable in India would entail imposing “substantial tax liabilities, after the fact, on entities that would avoid such liabilities according to this formal rule” 19 .

SUPREME COURT

Vodafone International Holdings … vs Union Of India & Anr

CITATION-[2012] 1 SCR 573

Whether the Indian Revenue Authority can tax a sale of shares between two non-resident companies on an offshore transaction where the controlling interest of an Indian corporation is purchased on the basis of that transaction?

PRINCIPLES DEALT BY SUPREME COURT

Piercing the corporate veil

Companies are separate legal entities that are independent from its shareholders and management. This is the foundation for company and tax laws. It is a general principle that a holding company is not liable for the acts of the subsidiary.

The Supreme Court held that it is the duty of the court to find the nature of the transaction and when doing it; it must look at the whole transaction and must not deal the elements of the transaction separately.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the transaction, the court must determine whether the transaction made primarily to evade taxes. It can be justified by piercing the corporate veil.

The Supreme Court held that strategic foreign direct investment (FDI) into India must be seen in a holistic manner.

By application of this doctrine, the Supreme Court held that the major purpose in Vodafone was to transfer the shares of CGP and not transferring the rights in HEL (situated in India). The court held that corporate can be pierced and the principal company can be held liable for the acts of the subsidiary company when it is shown that the company has misused to achieve certain wrongful objectives. 20

Tax avoidance and tax planning

The Supreme Court made a detailed difference between tax evasion and tax planning. The court held that tax planning is not illegal, illegitimate or impermissible. The debate over the validity and legality of the decision in Union of India v Azadi Bachao Andolan ((2004) 10 SCC 1)) and its departure from McDowell and Co Ltd v CTO ((1985) 3 SCC 230) on the specific issue of tax avoidance has been settled in this case.

The Court clarified that Justice Reddy’s observations extended only to artificial and colourable devices. Thereby it is wrongful to understand that mean all tax planning is illegal, illegitimate or impermissible.

Limitation Of Benefits clause.

Justice Radhakrishnan (in his concurring judgment) held that in case of absence of LOB clause in the Treaty, and in light of the existence of CBDT Circular No. 789 of 2000 and a TRC certificate, the Revenue cannot at the time of sale, disinvestment or exit from FDI in India, deny benefits to Mauritian companies by stating that the FDI was routed through a Mauritius company from somewhere else.

Tax Residency Certificate

In this case, the court held that the treaty and circular will not restrict the Revenue from denying Treaty benefits, when it is proven that the Mauritian company at the time of disposal of shares, made the transaction with intent to avoid tax. The court also referred to the memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between India and Mauritius which is to track down transactions tainted by fraud and financial crimes. The court held that Mauritius is a clean jurisdiction to route investments into India and, provided the transaction is not found to illegal or colourable which was designed to evade tax.

Section 9 of the Act  

The Supreme Court explained that section 9(1)(i) gathers in one place various types of income that are deemed to accrue or arise in India. It includes: “All income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India, or through or from any property in India, or through or from any asset or source of income in India, or through the transfer of a capital asset situate in India”.

“The Supreme Court noted that the words “directly or indirectly” in section 9(1)(i) of the Act refer to the income and not the transfer of a capital asset (property). It held that to apply the words “directly or indirectly” to the transfer of a capital asset (such as HEL) “would amount to changing the content and ambit of section 9(1)(i). We cannot re-write section 9(1)(i). The legislature has not used the words indirect transfer in section 9(1)(i).” It noted that, “if the word indirect is read into Section 9(1)(i), it would render the express statutory requirement of the 4th sub-clause in section 9(1)(i) nugatory” 21

The court also made reference to the fact that the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 (DTC) proposes the taxation of offshore share transactions, which leads to the inference that indirect transfers are not presently covered by section 9(1)(i).

Transfer of HTIL’s property rights by extinguishment  

The court held that the case concerned the sale of shares and not the sale of assets. The court adopted the “look at” approach (as opposed to the “dissecting” approach) and held that the facts and circumstances of the present case must be viewed holistically. Hutchison has been part of Indian telecom business since 1994, and had been paying income tax in India.

Therefore, the transaction entered into cannot be considered sham or colourable. The court was of the view that the transaction took place only with intent to invest in India and not evade tax. The court also held that non-compete rights and the use of the Hutch brand were not property rights and it could not be subject to tax in India.

Withholding tax obligations: sections 195 and 163 of the Act

The transaction entered into by the companies is between two non-resident entities and was executed outside India. Consideration was also passed outside India. The court held that when a payment is made between two non-residents situated outside India, then the transaction has no nexus with the underlying assets in India. Therefore, Vodafone was not legally obliged to respond to the section 163 notice issued which declares a purchaser of an asset as a “representative assessee”.

The tax is levied on the basis of the source and the source is the location where the sale takes and not where the product is derived or purchased from.

HTIL and VIH are foreign companies and the sale takes place outside India, so the source of revenue is outside India. It could be taxable only when this trade is protected by legislation. The tax laws must be strictly construed and tax can be laid only when the language of the statute unambiguously states so. The provision for charging income tax must not be expanded to impose a tax burden which would otherwise be non-taxable. Therefore indirect movement of capital assents cannot be included by expansion of the provision. The present transaction was carried out between two non-resident persons in a contract conducted outside India where the consideration was also rendered outside India and VIH is therefore not legally obligated to respond to the notice referred to in section 163 relating to the purchaser’s care as a representative measure.

The selling of HTIL’s CGP shares to Vodafone or VIH amount to transfer of capital assets under the scope of Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act and therefore not chargeable under capital gains tax on all rights and entitlements resulting from the shareholder agreement, etc., which form an integral part of CGP ‘s shares. The order of High Court of the demand of nearly Rs.12, 000 crores by way of capital gains tax would amount to imposing capital punishment for capital investment and it lacks authority of law and therefore is quashed.

GROUNDS ON WHICH THE ORDER CAN BE REVERSED

1. On bringing the retrospective amendment which states that any income which arises either directly or indirectly by means of or by reason of transfer of assets in India shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India and can be

2. The explanation inserted by finance Act 2012 to sec. 9(1)(1) in its 2 nd exception provides that CGP Investments is a 100 % subsidiary company of Hutchison company and is wholly controlled by the latter company. Therefore the exception provided in the explanation is not applicable and hence capital gain arising through sale is taxable at source.

The SC through its landmark judgment has removed certain uncertainties revolving around the imposition of taxes in the country. By means of this verdict certain principles have been established and recognized by the SC including:

• Principles relating to tax policies and plans
• The validity of tax avoidance by providing the taxpayers the right to reduce their liabilities to a maximum extent by legitimate arrangement of their income and business affairs provided nothing contrary to such act is specified in the enactments.
• The establishment of corporate structures by multinational companies for business and commercial purpose.
• The application of the principle of lifting of the corporate veil in all transactions done with an objective of evading taxes.
• Lastly the need for a holistic view or approach when dealing with cases involving companies having made investments in tax neutral countries. It further urges to avoid the misconception that presence of corporate structures in tax free countries is necessarily a scheme for avoiding tax.

In short, the SC through its judgment has distinguished tax avoidance from tax evasion and along with certain other significant principles recognized tax avoidance as a legitimate activity while penalizing tax evasion, further highlighting its view on the need for a legitimate tax planning.

CRITICISMS TO THE SC JUDGEMENT:

The judgment pronounced by the SC in this case has been to subject to severe criticisms. The SC is loathed for providing such a verdict. It is argued that SC has set a precedent that brings into jeopardy thousands of crores of potential revenue.it was also pointed out that tax avoidance through artificial devices is now a days very much prevalent in the industry and many large firms gain huge sums of money through such schemes. It was opined that the judgment in McDowell though reverted by 2 other decisions (Azadi Bachao Andholan and Wallfort) has dealt with the issue in the right perspective. The Mauritius companies are considered to be ‘post box companies’ and its remarked that the benign attitude of the tax authorities has led to a blatant evasion of taxes. The SC is blamed for not setting right the mistake it made by transgressing the McDowell judgment in the Vodafone verdict. The SC verdict is condemned on the basis that despite being aware of the transaction’s true nature as being transfer of Indian asset the SC has shown ignorant behaviour by providing such a verdict. This act of SC is viewed as a welcoming gesture for the foreign companies to evade taxes in India, jeopardizing crores and crores of potential revenue to the country and the attitude of courts towards such artificial tax evading devices. This judgment as a contract to the judgment in the 2G scam is considered to be arbitrary in nature.

CASES IN WHICH VODAFONE CASE HAS BEEN CITED

1. M/S Shri Vishnu Eatables (India) … vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income … on 3 October, 2016

“It is necessary for the Assessing Officer to decide the issue of objection to applicability of chapter X, if raised by the assessee, before referring the transaction to the TPO as it is a basic issue and would prevent loss of man hours on both sides in computing the ALP if it is finally concluded that Chapter X is not applicable.” 22 [3]

2. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Mumbai

Exind Trading P. Ltd, Mumbai vs Ito 6(2)(4), Mumbai on 7 November, 2019 It was held that the Vodafone case and CBDT Circular was not applicable in this case.

3. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Mumbai

Income Tax Officer-1(3) (2), … vs Singhal General Traders Private … on 24 February, 2020

“The premium on share issue was on account of a capital account transaction and does not give rise to income and hence, not liable to transfer pricing adjustment.” 23

4. Allahabad High Court

Rakesh Mahajan vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 4 December, 2019

“The legal relationship between a holding company and WOS is that they are two distinct legal persons and the holding company does not own the assets of the subsidiary and, in law, the management of the business of the subsidiary also vests in its Board of Directors.” 24

5. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Delhi

M/S. New Delhi Television Ltd., … vs Dcit, New Delhi on 14 July, 2017

“If an actual controlling Non-Resident Enterprise (NRE) makes an indirect transfer through “abuse of organisation form/legal form and without reasonable business purpose” which results in tax avoidance or avoidance of withholding tax, then the Revenue may disregard the form of the arrangement or the impugned action through use of Non-Resident Holding Company, re-characterize the equity transfer according to its economic substance and impose  the tax on the actual controlling Non-Resident Enterprise.”25 [4]

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND VODAFONE CASE

The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, Netherlands, held that an amendment to Indian tax laws was in violation India and the Netherlands agreement.

The international arbitration proceeding was initiated by Vodafone International Holdings

B.V. (VIH or Vodafone) against the government of India regarding the retrospective amendment made to Indian tax

Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) held that the imposition of taxation through a retrospective amendment to domestic tax laws for imposition of tax, was in violation of “fair and equitable treatment” provided under the Agreement between the Republic of India (India) and the Kingdom of Netherlands (Netherlands). Moreover, any attempt to enforce tax demand on Vodafone would amount to breach of international obligations.

The objective of the agreement is for Promotion and Protection of Investments (India- Netherland BIT). This award does not mark the end of dispute as the Indian Government has the opportunity to challenge it before the High Court of Singapore.

The full text of the arbitration award is not in public domain. But it is known that the imposition of a tax liability based on a retrospective amendment is held to be breach of fair and equitable treatment laid down in Article 4(1) of the India-Netherland BIT.

Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled that the demand made by India for Rs 22,100 crore by retrospective amendment as capital gains and withholding of imposition of tax for a 2007 deal on Vodafone Company was breaching the provision of agreement regarding fair and equitable treatment.

Recently, the Indian government has challenged the arbitration award in Singapore Court. The government is of the opinion that the matter of taxation is not covered under the treaty and taxation is a sovereign right of the country.

CAIRN’s DISPUTE

Cairn UK Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in the U.K. (Cairn UK), had a wholly- owned subsidiary, Cairn India Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in Jersey (Cairn Jersey). Cairn Jersey owned subsidiaries in India. In the year 2006, Cairn UK transferred its entire shareholding of Cairn Jersey to Cairn India. Subsequently, Cairn India acquired the entire business of the Cairn group in India.

In 2014, pursuant to a survey action carried out at the premises of Cairn India, the Indian income-tax authorities was of the view that the transfer of shareholding in Cairn Jersey had the effect of transferring the business in India and therefore, in view of the retrospective amended income-tax laws, Cairn UK was liable to pay capital gain tax in India. This action was challenged by Cairn UK and is currently sub-judice before the High Court of Delhi in India. While the proceedings were ongoing in India, Cairn group also initiated arbitration proceedings against the Indian Government under Article 9 of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for Promotion and Protection of Investments (India-UK BIT).

BINDING FORCE OF VODAFONE CASE

The “Doctrine of Stare Decisis,” as prevalent in common law legal systems. It means “to abide by the precedents and not to disturb settled points.” There is no similar doctrine in civil law systems or under International Law. The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) provides that the award shall be final and binding upon the parties to the dispute. In absence of any prevalent rule of binding precedent of earlier awards, the international arbitration tribunals, functioning under ICSID and UNCITRAL, do consider previous awards to have a persuasive value.

Whether the Vodafone arbitral award would have any persuasive value in arbitration proceedings of Cairn UK would depend upon the factual matrix in both the cases.

Both cases involved indirect transfer of Indian assets prior to retrospective amendment in 2012 coming into effect.

Thereby the case was decided in favor of Cairn UK and it was not liable for capital gains tax.

CONSEQUENCE OF THE CASE

The government has got excessive flak for retaining India’s “retrospective” tax on asset transfers after it recently lost a case against Vodafone in an international arbitration court. Two broad critiques are important to note.

1. Governments should never make tax changes with retrospective

2. Tax laws must be stable in order to attract foreign (or even domestic) investment.

3. Vodafone must have been aware that asset transfers in India would attract capital gains By shifting the relevant jurisdiction to a tax haven, it seems to have got a lower price from Hutchison, a majority owner of the telecommunications company. Therefore, the objective appears to be a case of tax avoidance by using a grey area in Indian tax law.

Professionals have said that there is a need for clarity and certainty in tax laws to attract foreign investments. A liberal tax policy would attract Foreign Direct Investment into India. Some professionals say that the SC could have considered this issue and that is the reason why the decision is in favour of the foreign investor (Vodafone).

The arbitration tribunal also held that the terms of the agreement was not complied by India and it is established that India has contravened the provisions of the agreement. Therefore, the government must stop taking measures to recover tax from Vodafone.

AMENDMENTS IN TAX LAW RELATING TO VODAFONE CASE

In 2012, the government of India changed the Supreme Court’s decision by proposing an Amendment to the Finance Act, which gave the power to Income Tax Department to retrospectively tax such deals.

RETEROSPECTIVE TAXATION

Retrospective taxation gives the state a power to make a rule on taxing certain products, items or services and deals and levy tax on companies even before the date the Act was passed.

Most of the countries use this method to rectify any gaps in their taxation laws that existed and allowed companies to take advantage of such loopholes. Many countries have retrospectively charged tax on companies.

Retrospective amendments are generally given to taxation laws to “clarify” the previously existing laws. It ends up hindering companies which interpreted the rules, knowingly or unknowingly in a different way. These retrospective amendments had been criticised by various investors as, this type of change in laws would affect foreign fund flow into India.

In this case, the Parliament passed the amendment to the Finance Act in 2012, by retrospective effect and subsequently made Vodafone liable for tax payment. Thereby, this case was called ‘retrospective taxation case’.

EFFECT OF RETROSPECTIVE AMENDMENT:

The onus to pay taxes fell on Vodafone after the government enacted the retrospective amendments. This amendment was criticized by investors globally. The amendment was held to be a badly drafted law as it had affected to nullify the decision of the highest court of the Nation. Following such criticisms India tried to settle matters amicably with Vodafone but all its attempts faced failure.

Does the legislature have the right to declare any decision of the court of law to be void or of no effect?

In Shri Prithvi cotton mills limited and another v. Brouch Borough Municipality and others 6 1969(2) SCC 283 the court remarked that even if the legislature has competence it cannot merely pass a law to which the verdict of the court shall not bind as such an act is a tantamount to reversing the decision of the court by exercise of judicial power which the legislative authority does not possess. A court’s decision can only be altered when unless it is fundamentally incorrect.

In Cauvery water disputes Tribunal, a constitutional bench held that legislature is authorized to change the basis of the verdict and thus the law in general affecting a class of persons at large but the legislature cannot bring any laws overriding the court’s decision such that it affects the rights and liabilities of an individual person.

Similarly, in State of Tamil Nadu v. State of Kerala and another 9 (2014)12 SCC 696 the court held that as per the doctrine of separation of powers enriched in the constitution all the 3 organs are independent and thus a law can be set aside only when it breaches the principles of equality as enriched in the article 14 of the constitution. Further it declared that the HC and SC are empowered to determine the validity of any law of the legislature.

From the above decisions its clear that the legislature cannot bring into effect any law which overrides court’s verdict and affects the rights of an individual alone as in the landmark case of Vodafone. But it has the right to effect laws affecting a class of people in general.

As the Supreme Court decided in favor of Vodafone, subsequent amendments to the Act were brought in by the legislative authorities to reverse the judgment. The Act was amended such that it provides for the following:

INCOME THROUGH TRANSFER OF CAPITAL ASSET SITUATED IN INDIA: –

SECTION 9: it provides that the following income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India:

All income arising directly or indirectly

• Through any business connection in India or
• From or through any property in India or
• Through any asset or source of Income in India or
• Through the transfer of capital asset situate in

The following explanations 4, 5, 6 and 7 was inserted through Finance Act 2012 to section 9(1)(1).

Explanation 4 : it clarifies that the word “through” shall mean and include and shall be deemed to have always included “by means of”, “in consequence of” or “by reason of”.

Explanation 5 : through this it is clarified that an asset or capital asset being shares or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside India shall be deemed to have been situated in India, if the share or interest derives, directly or indirectly, its value substantially from the assets located in India.

But in order to make explanation 5 operational the Finance Act 2015 provided certain clarifications:

Explanation 6 : For the purpose of this clause, it is hereby declared that-

1. Substantial – any share or interest of a foreign company shall be deemed to derive its value substantially from the assets situated in India, if on specified date the value of Indian assets-

• Exceeds the amount of 10cr rupees; and
• Represents at least 50% of all the assets owned by the company or

2. Value of asset – the value of the asset shall be fair market value of such asset without reduction of liabilities, if any in respect of the

3. Specified date – it is the date on which the accounting period of the company or entity ends preceding the date of transfer. If on the other hand the book value as on date of transfer of the assets exceeds at least 15% of book value as on the last balance sheet date preceding the date of transfer, than instead of the date mentioned above the date shall be the specified date of valuation.

4. Mode of determining FMV: the fair market value will be determined as per the rules prescribed.

5. Taxation on proportional basis: the capital gains arising out of the transfer of shares of assets located outside India of any company registered outside India will be taxed proportionally as specified in the

Explanation 7 provides for certain exceptions; they are as follows:

Exemption in case foreign company or entity (whose share or interest get transferred) directly owns Indian assets

Exemption shall be available to the transferor of a share of, or interest in, a foreign entity if the transferor (along with its associated enterprises), at any time in the twelve months preceding the date of transfer,

a. Neither holds the right of control or management of such foreign company or entity;

b. Nor holds voting power or share capital or interest exceeding 5 per cent of the total voting power or total share capital of such foreign company or entity;

Exemption in case foreign company or entity (whose share or interest get transferred) indirectly owns Indian assets

 In case the transfer is of shares or interest in a foreign entity which does not hold the Indian assets directly then the exemption shall be available to the transferor if the transferor (along with its associated enterprises), at any time in the twelve months preceding the date of transfer-

a. Neither holds the right of management or control in relation to such foreign company or the entity

b. Nor holds any rights in such company which would entitle it to either exercise control or management of the company or entity that directly owns the assets situated in India or

c. Nor entitle it to voting power exceeding 5 percent of total voting power of the company or entity that directly owns the assets situated in India.

Impact of the explanations on the final verdict:

From explanation 4 added it can be deduced that any income which arises either directly or indirectly by means of or by reason of transfer of assets in India shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India and is taxable in the hands of Hutchison company, Hong Kong.

Similarly, explanation 5 brings within its scope the transfer of shares of CGP investments, Mauritius being a company incorporated outside India. It provides that the shares are situated in India as such and shares derive its substantial value from the business of a company located in India.

This way through such amendments the coverage of section 9(1)(1) has been increased retrospectively to include indirect transfers.

Impact of the exemptions given in Explanation 7:

As the Vodafone case revolves around indirect transfers the second exemption provided is of importance. From the second exemption it can be seen that to be relieved from tax burden in case of transfer of shares of a foreign entity, here which is shares of CGP Investments, Mauritius, which indirectly holds Indian assets the transferor or the seller in the given case being Hutchison, Hong Kong must not manage, control or hold any rights which may provide for such control over the foreign entity whose shares are being transferred i.e., CGP Investments.

But, CGP Investments being a 100 % subsidiary company of Hutchison, Hong Kong is completely controlled by the latter and thus, Hutchison does not come within the scope of this exception. Hence, any capital gain arising from sale of the shares of CGP Investments is taxable at source in its hands.

Thus, in a way it can be concluded that the amendments brought about through the finance act 2015 become rationally comprehensive in budget 2012. Thereby, through such amendments the coverage of section 9(1)(1) has been increased retrospectively to include indirect transfers to cancel the effect of the SC verdict.

SECTION 2(14) 0F THE INCOME TAX ACT

“ capital asset” means property of any kind held by an assessee, whether or not connected with his business or profession, but does not include:

(i) Any stock- in- trade, consumable stores or raw materials held for the purposes of his business or profession;

(ii) For personal effects, that is to say, movable property (including wearing apparel and furniture, but excluding jewellery) held for personal use by the assessee or any member of his family dependent on him.

(iii) Agricultural land in India, not being land situate-

(iv) 6 per cent Gold Bonds, 1977, or 7 per cent Gold Bonds, 1980, or National Defence Gold Bonds, 1980, issued by the Central Government;

(v) Special Bearer Bonds, 1991, issued by the Central Government;

(vi) Gold Deposit Bonds issued under the Gold deposit Scheme,1999.

Both the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court held in this case that “controlling interest” is not a capital asset. The Finance Bill added the following Explanation:

The following explanation was added to the existing provision

Explanation: For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that

1. ‘property’ includes and shall be deemed to have always included

2. Any rights in or in relation to an Indian company,

3. Including rights of management or control or any other rights whatsoever”

Therefore, as per the amendment , the rights of the Hutchison Hong Kong in Indian company shall be included in the term capital asset under section 2(14) including the right of management and control (i.e.,) right to appoint directors , right to access to hutch brand in India and non-competing agreement . Hence, in this case the capital asset in India has been transferred by Hong Kong to Vodafone.

SECTION 2(47) IN THE INCOME TAX ACT

Transfer”, in relation to a capital asset, includes, (i)the sale, exchange or relinquishment of the asset; or

(ii) the extinguishment of any rights therein; or

(iii) the compulsory acquisition thereof under any law; or

(iv) in a case where the asset is converted by the owner thereof into, or is treated by him as, stock- in- trade of a business carried on by him, such conversion or treatment; or

(v) any transaction involving the allowing of the possession of any immovable property to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of TOPA Act ; or

(viii) Any transaction (whether by way of becoming a member of, or acquiring shares in, a co- operative society, company or other association of persons or by way of any agreement or any arrangement or in any other manner whatsoever) which has the effect of transferring, or enabling the enjoyment of, any immovable property.

For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that “transfer” includes and shall be deemed always to have included,

• Disposing of or parting with an asset or any interest therein, or
• Creating any interest in any asset in any manner whatsoever, directly or indirectly, absolutely or conditionally, voluntarily or involuntarily,
• By way of an agreement (whether entered into in India or outside India) or otherwise,
• Notwithstanding that such transfer of rights has been characterised as being effected or dependent upon or flowing from the transfer of a share or shares of a company incorporated outside India.”

Therefore, as per amendment, in this case, the transfer made by Hutchison Hong Kong to Vodafone is of the rights of Indian company including rights of management and control, as it has by transferring the shares of CGP Mauritius, disposed of or parted with the rights of the Indian company and through indirect means, created interest of Vodafone in Indian company. It has done this by way of agreement .Transfer of rights take place by way of transfer of shares by a company incorporated in Mauritius.

SECTION 195 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT- Other sums

(1) Any person responsible for paying to a non- resident, not being a company, or to a foreign company, any interest shall, at the time of credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof in cash or by the issue of a cheque or draft or by any other mode, whichever is earlier, deduct income- tax thereon at the rates in force.

Explanation 2 has been inserted in section 195(1) to clarify the obligation to comply with section 195(1) and to make deduction thereunder applies and shall be deemed to have always applied and extends and shall be deemed to have always extended to all persons, residents, non-residents, whether or not the non- resident has: –

(i) A residence or place of business or business connection in India.

(ii) Any other presence in any manner whatsoever in India.

Therefore as per amendment, the presence of Vodafone establishment in India or the residence or place of business of Vodafone or its business connection in India is not necessary for deduction under section 195 but Vodafone had sufficient nexus in India.

Retrospective amendments are amendments which have backwards operation i.e., they come into effect from a past date. In India the finance minister has recognized the power to legislate retrospective laws and amendments. But the question as to the constitutional legitimacy of such amendments is a debatable question; though it is held valid in certain situations majorly it is held to be inconsistent. Thus, as a check on such amendments their use is restricted only to exceptional cases.Vodafone was considered to be one such exceptional case were the amendments introduced in Finance act 2012 were given effect from the past date. It was a revolutionary but a clever move made by the GOI to tax the Vodafone company which faced severe criticism from the global investors. The arbitration also held it to be violative of the India-Netherlands BIT.

The Senior advocate and architect behind Vodafone’s win Harish Salve opined his view on the retrospective amendments being a crusher of India’s image in the minds of the overseas investors and citizens. He criticized the instability shown by our government. He stated that the prosperity of the country depends upon the economic and political institutions of the country, on their stability and transparency.

Hence, though the government is granted the power to legislate laws and amendments with retrospective effect, its scope is restricted to exceptional cases and so before making any retro operative law consideration of its necessity, applicability and effects by the government is vital.

Vishnupriya. B | 4 th year B.B.A.LL. B(Hons) SASTRA Deemed to be University. Thirumalaisamudram | [email protected]

Abirami. A. B | 4 th year B.B.A LL. B (Hons) SASTRA Deemed to be University. Thirumalaisamudram | [email protected]

Nithya Parvathy.RG

Soundarya .A.

3 http://ramauniversityjournal.com/law/pdf_dec2019/03.pdf

4 Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. L.K. Ratna & Ors (1986) 4 SCC 537

5 Krishnaji Ketkar vs Mahomed Haji Latif & Ors on 19 April,1968 AIR 1413, 1968 SCR (3) 862

6 Bombay High court Judgment para 14(f)

7 Cadell Weaving Mill Co. P. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 6 February, 2001

8 Section 45 Income Tax Act

9 Section 2(24) (xvi) Income tax Act

10 Bombay High court Judgment para 13(e)

11 Bombay High court Judgment para 16(i)

12 Mazagaon Dock Ltd. V. CIT [1988] 34 ITR 368

13 Taxation of notional income: a comparison of tax regimes-Manu Patra

14 Bombay High Court Judgment para 18(f)

15Bombay High Court Judgment para 6(g)3

16 Bombay High Court Judgment para 18(b)

17 Writ Petition No. 1325 of 2010, decision delivered on September 8, 2010 paragraph 54

18 Brassard v. Smith 39 (1925) AC 371 as quoted in paragraph 95 of the Judicial    Opinion

19 Weisbach, David A. 2002. “An Economic Analysis of Anti-Tax-Avoidance Doctrines”

20 United States v. Bestfoods [141 L Ed 2d 43: 524 US 51 (1998)]

21 Victory for Vodafone in Indian Supreme Court: the final conclusion or another twist in the tale? by Aditi Mukundan and Mansi Seth, Nishith Desai Associates

22 Judgment para 16

23 Judgment para 7

24 Judgment para 68

25 Judgment para 5.12

• Vodafone tax case
• « Previous Article
• Next Article »

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

• Join Our whatsApp Channel
• Join Our Telegram Group

One Comment

Very well written article.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Comment

Subscribe to Our Daily Newsletter

Latest posts.

Violation of Section 42(6) of Companies Act: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 2 Crores

Format of Annual Secretarial Compliance Report

DGFT Notification No. 71/2023: Implications & Clarifications

Discussion paper on Strengthening process of issuance of record of default by Information Utility

FSSAI Suspends Reliable Analytical Labs Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai

CIAV’s services do not qualify as that of an “intermediary”: AAR Telangana

Uttarakhand HC Formulates Procedure to Expedite Issue of Shifting of HC From Nainital

Insights into Voluntary Liquidation Procedures under Section 59 of IBC

Income Tax Compliances in case of Death of a Taxpayer

Clearing House Agents: Licensing requirements, application & examination procedures

Featured posts.

Non-filing of e-Form DIR-12 for Additional Director regularisation: MCA Imposes ₹6 Lakh Penalty

Non-Appointment of CS: MCA imposes a whopping ₹21.73 Lakh Penalty

Non-filing of E-Form CHG-1 for secured charge creation: MCA imposes ₹3.75 Lakh Penalty

Empanelment with Punjab & Sind Bank for Concurrent Audit: Last Date 08/06/2024

MCA Imposes Rs. 7 Lakh Penalty for Non-Filing of E-Form BEN-2

ITAT deletes section 69A addition for Income Declared under section 44AD

Review of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949: Public Comments Invited

ITAT Grants Section 54 Deduction for New Residential Property in Wife’s Name

Live Course on How to Reply to GST Notices & SCN & to Fake ITC Notices? – Last day to Register

Popular posts.

Due Date Compliance Calendar May 2024

Corporate Compliance Calendar for May, 2024

GST Implications on Hotels & Restaurant Industry

May, 2024 Tax Compliance Tracker: Income Tax & GST Deadlines

NFRA imposes penalty of 4.5 Cr on CA and CA Firm for Audit Lapses

GST compliance calendar for May 2024

Time Limits in GSTR 3B for Late Input Tax Credit Claims

Importance of a Well-Crafted Signature for Chartered Accountants (CA)

CBDT Circular No. 6/2024: Relief for TDS Deductors on PAN-Aadhar Linkage

• Tata Steel share price
• 162.35 0.22%
• ITC share price
• 433.20 1.88%
• State Bank Of India share price
• 818.35 -0.16%
• HDFC Bank share price
• 1,437.60 -0.74%
• Tata Motors share price
• 1,046.85 1.62%
• HDFC Bank Share Price
• Reliance Industries Share Price
• TCS Share Price
• Infosys Share Price
• HUL Share Price

₹ 25 in bull case" data-reg = "Almost 100% potential upside! Citi says stars finally aligning for Vodafone Idea; sees it hitting ₹ 25 in bull case">Almost 100% potential upside! Citi says stars finally aligning for Vodafone Idea; sees it hitting ₹25 in bull case

Global brokerage citi research sees potential for nearly 100% upside in vodafone idea stock, setting a target price of ₹25. key assumptions include higher tariff hikes, subscriber additions, decline in agr debt, and improved net debt/ebitda ratio by fy28e..

The stars are finally aligning for Vodafone Idea , believes global brokerage house Citi Research. After an almost 87 percent jump in Vodafone Idea in the last one year, the brokerage expects another almost 100 percent potential upside in the telecom stock in its bull case scenario.

In this scenario, it has a target price of ₹ 25 for the stock, indicating an upside of 97 percent from its current market price of ₹ 12.7. Key assumptions behind its bull case TP of ₹ 25 are - 1) Higher tariff hikes (20 percent each), taking FY28E ARPU (average revenue per user) to ₹ 250; 2) Higher subscriber additions; 3) Decline in AGR (adjusted gross revenue) debt by over 50 percent ( ₹ 35,000 crore); and 4) FY28E net debt/EBITDA ratio of 5x.

"The stars are finally aligning for VI following completion of its long-delayed equity raise. The govt’s backing, which we view as tantamount to doing what it takes to ensure that the 3-player industry structure stays intact, has been instrumental in setting up the company for this turnaround and providing it a “fresh lease of life", as KM Birla proclaimed. We, too, are enthused by recent developments, with the ₹ 20,000 crore equity raise (over ₹ 25,000 crore planned debt raise) enabling VI to accelerate network investments and narrow the gap with peers on 4G coverage and 5G rollouts," said Citi.

Read here: BofA upgrades Vodafone Idea rating to 'Neutral' on tariff hike leverage

However, it cautioned that a lot still needs to fall into place, starting with (multiple) tariff hikes & arresting the subscriber decline, and ideally culminating in (some form of) debt relief, driving its Neutral/High-Risk rating for the stock.

The brokerage incorporated the equity raise and increased its FY25-26E EBITDA by 5-18 percent. Meanwhile, its base case target price for the stock is ₹ 15, implying an over 18 percent potential upside.

Key assumptions for the base case scenario include 1) an ARPU increase of around 60 percent over four years (from ₹ 143 to around ₹ 230 over FY24-28E), driven by approximately 15 percent 4G tariff hikes each in 2QFY25E and 3QFY26E; 2) Revenue market share expected to stay stable at around 16 percent; 3) The government exercising the option to part-convert its dues into equity after the moratorium ends (total gov’t dues amount to ₹ 29,100 crore in H2FY26 and ₹ 43,000 crore/yr from FY27); 4) No AGR relief from the pending curative petition in the Supreme Court; 5) A FY28E net debt/EBITDA ratio of around 7x; 6) The target EV/EBITDA set at 11x, aligning with Bharti's multiple, but based on FY28E (discounted back) to account for operational recovery, with a projected 4-year EBITDA CAGR of 21 percent from a low base.

Read here: Vodafone Idea in talks with PSBs to avail loans worth ₹ 15,000 crore: Report

As per the brokerage, the completion of the long-delayed fund raise firmly puts to rest existential concerns and puts VI on the recovery path by enabling it to reinvest in the network and catch up with peers. 

Citi believes that the risk/reward is, therefore, not yet compelling and it prefers staying on the sidelines for now, but will closely monitor developments. It views the stock as a “show me" story, with returns contingent on not just industry dynamics and continued government support but also the company’s execution.

Furthermore, Citi noted that the management is optimistic of the industry taking tariff hikes sooner rather than later after the June 2024 election results, which it believes are imperative for the industry given significant network & spectrum spends. Besides tariff hikes, ARPUs should additionally benefit from upgrading 2G subscribers to 4G, given that 42 percent of VI’s subscribers are not yet on 4G (vs 29 percent for Bharti).

Read here: Vi loses 680,000 subscribers in March, its fewest in seven months

Management also highlighted that VI’s share in gross subscriber additions (26 percent) is higher than its current customer market share (19 percent), which makes it confident of being able to reverse net subscriber losses once 4G coverage expands (and churn therefore reduces), added Citi.

Read here: Prabhudas Lilladher advises long-term SIPs in Aditya Birla Group stocks

Investment strategy.

The brokerage has rated Vodafone Idea as Neutral/High risk.

"The company’s balance sheet leverage has remained uncomfortably high and had worsened following the adverse Supreme Court verdict on the AGR issue in Oct’19. However, gov’t moves including a four-year moratorium on spectrum & AGR payments have provided material cash flow relief, while the completion of the long-delayed fundraise ensures sufficient capital for the company to reinvest in the network and reduce the gap vis-à-vis its two peers on 4G coverage & 5G rollouts. Gov’t support to ensure that the 3-player industry structure stays intact has been unequivocally evident, though continued dilution remains a key uncertainty. We, therefore, remain on the sidelines," it explained.

Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.

VODAFONE IDEA

Milestone Alert! Livemint tops charts as the fastest growing news website in the world 🌏 Click here to know more.

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed - it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Get the best recommendations on Stocks, Mutual Funds and more based on your Risk profile !

Wait for it…

Log in to our website to save your bookmarks. It'll just take a moment.

You are just one step away from creating your watchlist!

Oops! Looks like you have exceeded the limit to bookmark the image. Remove some to bookmark this image.

Your session has expired, please login again.

Congratulations!

You are now subscribed to our newsletters. In case you can’t find any email from our side, please check the spam folder.

Subscribe to continue

This is a subscriber only feature Subscribe Now to get daily updates on WhatsApp

Open Demat Account and Get Best Offers

Start Investing in Stocks, Mutual Funds, IPOs, and more

• Please enter valid name
• Please enter valid mobile number
• Please enter valid email
• Select Location

I'm interested in opening a Trading and Demat Account and am comfortable with the online account opening process. I'm open to receiving promotional messages through various channels, including calls, emails & SMS.

The team will get in touch with you shortly