critical thinking skills for engineers

Critical Thinking for Engineers

Engineers are specialists in technical information. As the complexities of problems increase, there has been an increasing need for engineers to apply critical thinking in the context of problem solving. This article demonstrates the value and use of developing abstract thought in engineering, especially for students

Introduction

In school, the most widely used, or at least the most reputable method for solving problems is “Critical Thinking.” From understanding the works of a long dead philosopher to solving differential equations, “Critical Thinking” is like some sort of intellectual panacea. Although everyone can agree that “Critical Thinking” is usually a good thing, it is difficult to explain exactly what it is and even more difficult to teach it.

For most engineers, problem solving is essentially their profession. Critical thinking and abstract thought, then, are invaluable tools, which complement an engineer’s technical expertise. In this paper, our first goal is to define what exactly critical thinking is. From there, we will discuss examples, which highlight the importance of abstract thought as well efforts to teach this in the classroom. Finally, we will look at how this can be applied to our Senior Project and perhaps future work in general.

To begin, we will look at two definitions of critical thinking. In her 2002 article, Jessop argues that critical thinking is comprised of three major skills: analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. She goes on to quote a statement by Scriven (n.d.) to define the term more explicitly:

Critical Thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action.(as quoted in Jessop, 2002, p. 141)

Analysis is breaking down the problem into parts and finding the relationships between them. Synthesis is thinking about other ways to solve the problem either by incorporating new information or combining the parts in a different way. Finally, evaluation is making a judgment about the results using the evidence at hand.

According to Scriven (n.d.), then, critical thinking is the combined process of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Since we are trying to use critical thinking as “a guide to belief and action,” synthesis, or the generation of new ideas or solutions, is a necessary component. However, creating these new solutions is difficult, if not impossible, without understanding the problem, which leads to analysis. The process of critical thinking, though, does not stop at synthesis. Out of the results from the synthesis stage, some may be better than others. Moreover, it is possible that none of the results actually solve the problem. Because of this, it is necessary to evaluate the results in order to find the best answer. To better understand this definition, we will apply this to an example.

Let’s assume we want an egg for breakfast. For analysis , the parts of this process might be putting butter in a pan, breaking the egg, and then cooking it. For synthesis , there are many different ways to prepare eggs. For example, we could whisk the egg to make scrambled eggs, or maybe we want hard boiled eggs instead. Finally, we need to evaluate our result. There are many different criteria for this, such as which one takes the least amount of time, which is the most delicious, which is the healthiest, etc. In order to apply critical thinking to this problem, the goals are to understand the problem, find possible solutions, and evaluate the result.

For comparison, we now look at another definition of critical thinking. Qiao (2009) writes, “When one used the methods and principles of scientific thinking in everyday life, then he was practicing critical thinking. So scientific and critical thinking are the same thing…” The first thing that comes to mind when thinking about “scientific thinking” is the scientific method, so at first, this comparison seems a little odd. For reference, the steps of the scientific method are presented as follows (Wikipedia, n.d.):

• Define a question
• Gather information and resources (observe)
• Form an explanatory hypothesis
• Test the hypothesis by performing an experiment and collecting data in a reproducible manner
• Analyze the data
• Interpret the data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis
• Publish results
• Retest (frequently done by other scientists)

In the steps above, we see some similarities with the earlier definition of critical thinking. Earlier, we stated that critical thinking was composed of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. While engineers typically begin with problems instead of questions, the gathering of information and resources is definitely a part of analysis. In both cases, understanding the problem or question is a priority. In critical thinking, the next step would be synthesis. A scientist may be trying to answer a question by forming a hypothesis, but the need to imagine different possibilities and find an answer that fits is the same in engineering. Lastly, steps 4-6 could be considered one way to evaluate the results from synthesis. While a scientist may test his or her hypothesis with experiments, an engineer may run simulations or create prototypes. The point in either case, though, is to make sure is to ensure the ideas from earlier actually work.

Although we defined critical thinking from an engineer’s perspective, it should not be surprising that we can apply it loosely in other disciplines such as science. After all, the capacity for critical thinking is not limited to or only useful for engineers alone. Writers, philosophers, mathematicians, and many other disciplines make use of critical thinking as well. Even if the process is slightly different for each, at the very least, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation lie at the heart of critical thinking.

As a technical example of critical thinking, let us examine a problem a Tufts University student encountered while doing research over the summer. This student was writing the image processing code for a robot, which had a camera mounted on it.

The code to retrieve the video and display it was already written, so the student only had to focus on the image processing part. As a simple test, the student wrote a piece of code to find the number of black pixels in a video frame. The code was easy to test since all the pixels could be made black by covering up the camera. The problem occurred when the student’s code tried to count all the pixels when the camera was covered up. In this case, all the pixels should be black, but the student recorded only a fraction of that number.

So how did the student use critical thinking to solve the problem? First, he took into account all of the available information and tried to find possible sources of the problem. The input was a video frame with an apparent size of 480 x 640 pixels, which matched the output displayed. Repeating the test for black pixels consistently returned the same fraction. When the student modified his code to check for pixels of any colors, the result found the expected number of pixels, so at first the problem appeared to be related to detecting the black pixels. The student, however, had tested that part of the code thoroughly, and was fairly confident that it was not the source of the problem.

Continuing on with his analysis, the student decided to directly save the video frame and display it. Upon seeing the result, the student at once saw the problem and found a solution. While the given video frame had room for 480 x 640 pixels, the actual image was stored in the upper left hand corner as a 240 x 320 image. Thus, the student’s code was correct, as he originally surmised, and it was actually returning the correct number. The code to display the video, it turns out, expected this input, and resized the image to the 480 x 640 video feed that the student originally saw.

From there, the rest of the problem was straightforward. For synthesis, the student decided to use the upper left corner of the given images and ignore the rest of the pixels. The result was more efficient than the original code, since it only had to process a 240 x 320 image and it ignored the pixels that were skewing the results. This example demonstrates the importance of analysis in critical thinking. Without an understanding of the problem, it is unlikely that the student would have found a solution by starting with the synthesis step. In this case, the solution and the tests to make sure it worked were relatively simple, so the synthesis and evaluation steps were not as important. Nevertheless, applying all of these steps in tandem allowed the problem to be successfully solved.

Engineering Curriculum

For the most part, critical thinking has typically been something reserved for the liberal arts, especially English and Philosophy. Even on standardized tests like the SATs, there is a critical reading section. However, as we discussed earlier, critical thinking is not limited to the liberal arts; it is also an integral part of the sciences and engineering.

Recently, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has been pushing for more emphasis on communication skills and understanding the global context of today’s problems in the engineering curriculum. Previously, and even now, the ABET accreditation process acknowledged schools that trained students not only to be able to apply their technical knowledge, but also lead and work well in teams. ABET believes that their new objectives can be achieved through the inclusion of more writing and critical thinking in the engineering classroom (Gunnink & Bernhardt, 2002).

Although most people agree that critical thinking should be a focus in school, there are a variety of proposed methods, but no single class or solution stands out. Even though we have been treating critical thinking as an individual effort, a few papers have suggested the use of group discussions and forums in order to encourage critical thinking (Radzi et al., 2009; Jacob et al, 2009). After defining critical thinking in her article, Jessop (2002) suggests a course based on Brainstorming and Critical Reading. For the brainstorming section, students are given a problem, and then, over the course of a few weeks, students must engineer a solution. For the critical reading section, students are given a number of journal articles to read and evaluate. Naturally, the brainstorming half is mainly concerned with the synthesis aspect of critical thinking while the critical reading half focuses on the analysis aspect (Jessop, 2002). The hope, of course, is that by practicing these steps, the students will become better at critical thinking in the future.

As mentioned earlier, Qiao (2009) was writing on critical thinking in schools in China. Qiao goes on to state, “The nature of authority has two forms: textbook authority and teacher authority. Laws and rules in textbook are golden and precious, beyond any manner of doubt. Science teacher is the prolocutor of truth.” (2009, p. 115). In order to promote critical thinking and a sense of skepticism, Qiao suggests a History, Philosophy, and Science (HPS) Education approach. In addition to the usual Science that students learn about, Qiao (2009) believes it is valuable to learn about both the History and Philosophy behind these advancements. While Jessop’s (2002) strategy is purely from an engineer’s perspective, Qiao’s approach relies on the idea that critical thinking is not restricted to engineers. Instead, the capacity for critical thought is developed through studies in history and philosophy.

Despite the differences in each method, the goal is the same. In order to tackle increasingly difficult problems, engineers will require more than just technical knowledge. To this end, there is a need for teachers and experts, whose job is to train these engineers, to bring critical thinking into the classroom.

Application to Senior Project

In this paper, we have attempted to answer questions like, “What is critical thinking?” and “Why is it important?” As we stated before, critical thinking can be thought of as similar to the scientific method, but its main points are the problem definition and understanding, the search for solutions, evaluation, and iteration. Since critical thinking is a powerful tool in problem solving, we have seen recent efforts to include it in the engineering curriculum. The final question we want to answer is, “How does this apply to our senior project?

The answer to this lost question is relatively simple. Each of our senior projects , if properly scoped and planned, should aim to solve a problem. In light of this, we should strive to solve these problems intelligently, which is to say, using critical thinking. This means fully researching and understanding the problem, creating new solutions and finding old ones, and evaluating the result. When our result is a failure, we go back, look for other solutions, and try again until we have solved the problem. So we can see that critical thinking is an important, if not essential, part of our senior project.

Cited References

• Gunnink, B., & Bernhardt, K. L. S. (2002). Writing, critical thinking, and engineering curricula. In Frontiers in Education , 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual (Vol. 2, pp. F3H–2–F3H–7 vol.2). Presented at the Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1158211
• Jacob, S. M., Lee, B., & Lueckenhausen, G. R. (2009). Measuring Critical Thinking Skills in Engineering Mathematics using online forums. In 2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 225–229). Presented at the 2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED). DOI: 10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490577
• Jessop, J. L. P. (2002). Expanding our students’ brainpower: idea generation and critical thinking skills. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine , 44(6), 140–144. DOI: 10.1109/MAP.2002.1167273
• Qiao, C. (2009). Science Education and Fostering of Critical Thinking in China. In Second International Conference on Education Technology and Training , 2009. ETT ’09 (pp. 114–117). Presented at the Second International Conference on Education Technology and Training, 2009. ETT ’09. DOI: 10.1109/ETT.2009.25
• Radzi, N. M., Abu, M. S., & Mohamad, S. (2009). Math-oriented critical thinking skills in engineering. In 2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), (pp. 212–218). Presented at the 2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED). DOI: 10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490579
• Scientific Method. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
• Scriven, M. & Paul, R. (n.d.) “Defining Critical Thinking.” National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking Instruction. Retrieved from http:/lwww.criticalthinking.orgiuniversitylunivclasslDe~ning.html

Additional Resource

• Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/
• Articles > 1. Design Process > Critical Thinking for Engineers

Search the Handbook:

Handbook overview.

• Introduction and Acknowledgements
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2022-23 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2021-22 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2020-21 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2019-20 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2018-19 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2017-18 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2016-17 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2015-16 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2014-15 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2013-14 Academic Year
• Senior Capstone Projects Summary for the 2012-13 Academic Year
• 1. Design Process
• 2. Management
• 3. Technologies
• 4. Communications And Life Skills
• 5. Tech Notes
• Electrical and Computer Engineering Design Handbook

Disclaimer | Non-Discrimination | Privacy | Terms for Creating and Maintaining Sites

New, Final IEEE-USA E-Book in Critical Thinking Skills for Engineers Series Offers Ten Proven Problem-Solving Strategies

By helen horwitz.

Critical Thinking Skills for Engineers – Book 5: On Problem Solving

FREE to Members Non-Members: $2.99

The noted engineer and business executive, Dinish Paliwal, once remarked, “Problem solving is essential to engineering. Engineers are constantly on the lookout for a better way to do things.”

In the fifth – and final – volume of his valuable e-book series, Critical Thinking Skills for Engineers , Sridhar Ramanathan offers ten proven strategies that offer a better way to do just that. His discussion of each method should motivate even the most jaded technical professional to explore and manage engineering challenges with a fresh perspective.

Ramanathan, who is managing director and co-founder of Aventi Group, a high-tech product-marketing group in San Francisco, firmly believes that critical thinking is vital for engineers and other technical professionals. “It enables you to help deliver the most effective and potentially novel breakthrough solution you can,” he says.

The author packs this final volume with many helpful ideas to help boost one’s problem-solving abilities using these methods:

• Problem statement
• Root cause analysis
• Abstraction
• Brainstorming
• Trial and error
• Hypothesis testing
• Divide and conquer
• Lateral thinking

He believes constructing the Problem Statement is the most important step of all in problem solving. He observes that Charles Kettering – the remarkable engineer, inventor and one-time head of research at General Motors – once summed up this critical step saying, “A problem well stated is a problem half solved.”

Ramanathan goes on to examine what he believes are the five key steps to developing effective problem statements: providing context, describing the current situation, clarifying the impact, describing the ideal state, and framing potential solutions. The goal, he explains, is to create concise, actionable problem statements.

Root Cause Analysis is another problem-solving tactic the author discusses at length. He uses the ASQ definition of root cause: “the core issue – the highest-level cause – that sets in motion the entire cause-and-effect reaction that ultimately leads to the problem(s).” He then provides examples, with two famous events in which investigators used Root Cause Analysis to determine the basic cause.

The first is the 2017 breach of Equifax by hackers, who exploited the servers of the credit-reporting agency. Ramanathan maps out how the United States General Accounting Office worked backward to ultimately discover that the customer complaint database had been left vulnerable to outside attacks.

“(Investigators) mapped the entire sequence of events that led to the breach,” he writes. “This is the heart of root cause analysis: sequencing events until you get to the core issue.”

The other example he provides of effectively using root-cause analysis is the Rogers Commission Investigation of the 1986 NASA Challenger shuttle disaster, which killed all seven astronauts on board. Much like the Equifax case, the investigators worked backward: from the explosion to a plume seen emanating from one of the solid-rocket boosters; to the seam where the solid rocket boosters were joined by O-rings that were meant to seal the seam; and ultimately, to the precise location of the O-ring failure.

However, Ramanathan points out that correlation is not causation. Richard Feynman, the Nobel Prize winning physicist who served as one of the investigators, had to prove with the others that each step of the failure led to a subsequent failure in a chain of events leading to the ultimate disaster.

One especially intriguing problem-solving strategy the author recommends is that of Analogy. “Many engineering problems that arise have actually already been solved in another context or situation,” he writes. Instead of starting from scratch, the author asks: Why not see whether an analogous problem in a totally different field might have a working solution?

One of the examples that illustrates his point is the so-called “traveling salesman problem” – situations where the shortest path must be computed to connect multiple points. Ramanathan observes this particular challenge appears in such diverse fields as logistics, DNA sequencing, astronomy, airline routing and manufacturing materials handling.

“The good news is this class of problem has been solved, and solutions are readily available,” he writes, observing the engineer faced with this problem could leverage an existing software algorithm to save time and money.

Critical Thinking Skills for Engineers – Book 5: Problem Solving is available free for members via the IEEE-USA Shop. Non-members pay $2.99.

The first four e-books in the Critical Thinking series are devoted to analytical skills, communication, creativity and open-mindedness. As with this final volume on Problem Solving, each e-book is also available, free to IEEE members, and $4.99 for non-members.

Sridhar Ramanathan has 30 years of experience in technology companies, ranging from startups to blue-chip firms. In his role with Aventi Group, he has been instrumental in leading many high-tech organizations through high-growth phases. Prior to to-starting Aventi, he was the marketing executive for Hewlett-Packard’s Managed Services business. Ramanathan has an MBA from the Wharton School of Business; and a B.S. in Engineering Physics, from the University of California, Berkeley.

Helen Horwitz is an award-winning freelance writer who lives in Albuquerque. She was with IEEE from 1991 through 2011, the first nine as Staff Director, IEEE Corporate Communications.

Helen Horwitz

Monthly email newsletter.

This monthly newsletter notifies U.S. members and subscribers of new online content, news, products, services, and events from IEEE-USA and other OUs.

Subscribe Now →

Related Articles

IEEE-USA Offers New E-Book for Members on Leading Exceptional Teams

Input Requested on Revision of Scouts BSA Electricity and Electronic Merit Badges

The Transformative Power of Recognizing and Affirming Colleagues in the Workplace

Five Leadership Skills Your Employees Want More of in 2024

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate this page from English...

*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy. Click Here for our professional translations.

Science and Engineering

Engineering instruction.

Engineering increasingly attends to systems of systems, where the product of the engineer’s intellect exhibits complex interactions with other systems, markets, technologies, the environment, and society. Additionally, the workplace demands that the individual engineer continually develop, mastering new learning and deal with increasing complexities. The thinking skills of our students and young engineers provide the foundation for that growth, while in school and in the workplace. When we explicitly target their thinking skills, we provide them leverage for learning both in class and on the job.

“Critical Thinking” can be an educational buzz-phrase which we presume implicit in rigorous programs. Or, substantively expressed, critical thinking becomes a “system opening system,” a lever for both cracking open both new domains and intensifying insight into the web of connections that characterize engineering work. Generalizable critical thinking skills and dispositions should guide professional reasoning through complex engineering questions and issues, whether technological, commercial, environmental, ethical, or social.

Yet our students do not naturally think using the tools of critical thinking; they do not intuit the important questions they should be asking of themselves, teachers, colleagues, customers, or vendors, to either guide their understanding or refine their thinking. It is therefore essential that we foster, through engineering instruction, the skills, abilities and traits of the disciplined mind.

Science Instruction

• Critical Thinking in Every Domain of Knowledge and Belief
• Becoming a Critic Of Your Thinking
• Critical Thinking Development: A Stage Theory
• Critical Thinking: Identifying the Targets
• Glossary of Critical Thinking Terms
• The Analysis & Assessment of Thinking
• The Role of Questions in Teaching, Thinking and Learning
• Universal Intellectual Standards
• Using Intellectual Standards to Assess Student Reasoning
• Distinguishing Between Inert Information, Activated Ignorance, Activated Knowledge
• Distinguishing Between Inferences and Assumptions
• Thinking With Concepts
• Valuable Intellectual Traits

Before you go, check this out!

We have lots more on the site to show you. You've only seen one page. Check out this post which is one of the most popular of all time.

What Are Critical Thinking Skills For Aerospace Engineers?

“Are you an aspiring aerospace engineer struggling to understand why  critical thinking skills  are essential for your profession? It’s a fact: critical thinking is one of the key skills that successful aerospace engineers possess.

This article will guide you through the importance and development of these crucial abilities, providing clear explanations and practical applications. Continue reading to unveil how strengthening your critical thinking capabilities can catapult your future in aerospace engineering!”.

Key Takeaways

• Critical thinking skills are crucial for aerospace engineers as they enable them to solve problems, make informed decisions, and evaluate alternative solutions.
• These skills involve translating issues into requirements, problem-solving, decision-making, analyzing and evaluating alternative solutions, and identifying strengths and weaknesses.
• Other essential skills for aerospace engineers include operations analysis abilities, analytical thinking skills, creativity, strong science and math knowledge, and computer skills.

Importance of Critical Thinking Skills for Aerospace Engineers

Critical thinking skills are crucial for aerospace engineers as they enable them to translate issues into requirements, solve problems, make informed decisions, analyze and evaluate alternative solutions, and identify strengths and weaknesses.

Translating issues into requirements

It’s key for an aerospace engineer to turn problems into needs. This means looking at a problem and finding out what is needed to fix it. As an example, let’s say there is an issue with a plane’s fuel system.

The engineer has to figure out what changes are needed for the system to work right. This could involve making new parts or changing how the system runs. The goal is always the same – take a problem and find a way to meet that need.

Problem-solving and decision making

Having good problem-solving and decision making skills is key for aerospace engineers. These are some reasons:

• Aerospace engineers often face challenging problems. They need to find ways to fix them quickly and effectively.
• Strong decision – making skills help choose the best solution from many options.
• Critical thinking plays a big part in this process. It helps analyze data in an honest, clear way.
• Logic and reasoning go hand-in-hand with critical thinking. These skills let engineers weigh up the pros and cons of different choices.
• Reading understanding is also useful here. It allows you to grasp complex ideas fast and apply them to problems on hand.
• Being able to adapt is crucial too. New issues can pop up at any time, so you have to be ready to adjust your plan.
• Lastly, these skills do not only benefit the work itself but also boost confidence in making tough decisions under pressure.

Analyzing and evaluating alternative solutions

It’s key for you to be able to pick apart problems and find many ways to fix them as an aerospace engineer. Here are some points showing how critical thinking fits into this:

• You must view issues from every angle. This helps to bring out new answers.
• Logic is a tool you use often. It aids in picking the best answer from your options.
• Reading and understanding data is vital. It informs decisions on what fixes to make.
• It’s not just about finding an option that works, but the one that works best. That’s where examining strengths and weaknesses comes in.
• Aerospace engineers need to think fast and adapt quicker yet still keep their choices sound.
• Part of your job will involve testing each option thoroughly before use.

Identifying strengths and weaknesses

Aerospace engineers need to be able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of different options. This means they can objectively evaluate the pros and cons of various solutions or approaches to a problem.

By using logic and reasoning, they can analyze data and information in order to make informed decisions. Being able to identify strengths allows aerospace engineers to capitalize on what is working well, while identifying weaknesses helps them address and improve upon areas that need attention.

This critical thinking skill is crucial for success in the field because it enables engineers to develop effective strategies and solutions that meet the complex demands of aerospace engineering.

Other Essential Skills for Aerospace Engineers

In addition to critical thinking skills, aerospace engineers also need to possess  operations analysis abilities , analytical thinking skills, creativity, strong science and math knowledge, and computer skills.

These essential skills are crucial for their success in  designing and developing aircraft and spacecraft ,  conducting research and testing , evaluating systems, and collaborating with teams.

Read more about the key skills required for aerospace engineering in this blog.

Operations analysis

Operations analysis is an essential skill for aerospace engineers. It involves studying and evaluating how systems work and identifying areas where improvements can be made. This includes looking at things like efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and safety measures.

Aerospace engineers use operations analysis to ensure that aircraft and spacecraft are functioning optimally and meeting industry standards. They analyze data, conduct tests, and make recommendations based on their findings.

By having strong operations analysis skills, aerospace engineers can help improve the performance of vehicles in terms of speed, fuel consumption, and overall functionality.

Aerospace engineers also need to consider factors such as maintenance requirements, environmental impact, and regulatory compliance during operations analysis. They must understand how different components interact with each other and how changes in one area may affect the entire system.

Through careful analysis, they can identify potential problems before they occur and come up with solutions to mitigate risks or optimize performance.

Analytical thinking

Analytical thinking is another important skill for aerospace engineers. This involves breaking down complex problems into smaller components and analyzing each part individually. By doing this, you can better understand how different elements interact and find innovative solutions.

Analytical thinking also helps in evaluating data objectively and drawing logical conclusions based on evidence. As an aerospace engineer, you will need to analyze various factors like performance metrics, system specifications, and safety regulations to make informed decisions.

Being able to think analytically will enable you to identify strengths and weaknesses in designs or processes, allowing for continuous improvement and innovation in your field.

Creativity is another essential skill for aerospace engineers. While critical thinking helps in problem-solving, creativity allows engineers to think outside the box and come up with innovative solutions.

In the aerospace industry, new challenges arise all the time, and it’s important for engineers to have creative ideas that can push boundaries and lead to advancements in technology.

Whether it’s designing new aircraft or finding more efficient ways of testing systems, creativity plays a key role in driving progress. By thinking creatively, aerospace engineers can contribute fresh perspectives and approaches that can help solve complex problems and improve existing processes.

Science and math skills

Science and math skills are essential for aerospace engineers. As an aerospace engineer, you will be working with complex equations, performing calculations, and analyzing data. You need a strong foundation in science and math to understand the principles behind aircraft and spacecraft design.

These skills will help you apply scientific theories to real-world problems and make accurate predictions about how different materials and components will perform in space or atmospheric conditions.

With your science and math skills, you’ll be able to analyze data, conduct experiments, and make informed decisions that contribute to the success of your projects.

Computer skills

Aerospace engineers need to have good computer skills. This is because computers are used extensively in the field of aerospace engineering. You will need to use computer software and programs to design and analyze aircraft and spacecraft.

These tools allow you to create detailed models, simulate flight conditions, and test different designs. In addition, you will also use computer systems to collect data, perform calculations, and generate reports.

Having strong computer skills will help you navigate these programs efficiently and effectively, allowing you to complete your work more accurately and quickly.

Job Duties of Aerospace Engineers

Aerospace engineers are responsible for designing and developing aircraft and spacecraft, conducting research and testing,  evaluating and improving systems , and collaborating with teams and stakeholders.

Discover the exciting world of aerospace engineering!

Designing and developing aircraft and spacecraft

Aerospace engineers have the important task of designing and developing aircraft and spacecraft. They use their technical knowledge to create innovative designs that meet specific requirements.

This involves considering factors such as aerodynamics, materials, and performance. Aerospace engineers also collaborate with teams to ensure that the designs are feasible and can be manufactured efficiently.

They play a critical role in making advancements in aviation and space exploration by using their problem-solving skills to overcome challenges and create cutting-edge vehicles for the future.

Conducting research and testing

Aerospace engineers like you play an important role in conducting research and testing. Here’s what that involves:

• Gather data: You collect relevant information about aircraft or spacecraft design, performance, and safety.
• Design experiments: Using your critical thinking skills, you come up with experiments to test different aspects of aerospace technology.
• Perform tests: You conduct experiments in laboratories or simulate real-life conditions to see how well the designs work.
• Analyze results: After performing tests, you carefully analyze the data to determine if the design meets the required specifications and identify any areas for improvement.
• Make adjustments: If any issues are found during testing, you collaborate with your team to develop solutions and make necessary adjustments to improve the design.
• Ensure safety: Throughout the research and testing process, you prioritize safety considerations to ensure that aircraft or spacecraft meet stringent safety standards.

Evaluating and improving systems

Aerospace engineers have the important task of evaluating and improving systems. This involves analyzing how different components work together to ensure smooth operation. It requires:

• Identifying areas for improvement: Aerospace engineers assess current systems to find any weaknesses or inefficiencies.
• Analyzing data: They collect and analyze data to understand system performance and identify areas that need improvement.
• Developing modifications: Engineers come up with ideas and solutions to enhance the system’s efficiency, safety or functionality.
• Testing new designs: They conduct tests and simulations to see how the proposed changes affect the system’s performance before implementing them.
• Implementing changes: Engineers work with teams to implement modifications, ensuring they meet safety standards and comply with regulations.
• Monitoring results: After implementing changes, aerospace engineers monitor the modified system’s performance to measure improvements and address any unforeseen issues.
• Continuous improvement: Aerospace engineers continuously evaluate systems, looking for new ways to enhance their functionality, reliability or efficiency.

Collaborating with teams and stakeholders

Aerospace engineers often have to work as part of a team, collaborating with other engineers and stakeholders to design and develop aircraft and spacecraft. This collaboration is essential because it allows different perspectives and expertise to come together, leading to better outcomes.

By working closely with others, aerospace engineers can share ideas, brainstorm solutions, and ensure that everyone is on the same page when it comes to project goals. Effective communication skills are also vital in these collaborations so that everyone understands their roles and responsibilities.

This teamwork not only enhances critical thinking but also fosters innovation and efficiency in the aerospace engineering field.

Ways to Develop and Improve Critical Thinking Skills

Develop and improve critical thinking skills by seeking continuous learning opportunities, engaging in problem-solving exercises and case studies, and practicing critical thinking in everyday situations.

Seeking continuous learning and professional development opportunities

To become a skilled aerospace engineer, it is important to always keep learning and growing in your field. Here are some ways you can seek continuous learning and professional development opportunities:

• Attend workshops, seminars, and conferences related to aerospace engineering.
• Take online courses or enroll in higher education programs to deepen your knowledge.
• Join professional organizations for aerospace engineers to connect with others in the field and gain access to resources.
• Participate in research projects or internships to gain practical experience.
• Read books, journals, and articles about advancements and trends in aerospace engineering.
• Stay updated with industry news and technological developments through reputable websites or newsletters.
• Seek mentorship from experienced aerospace engineers who can guide you in your career path .
• Engage in hands-on projects or design challenges to enhance your problem-solving skills.
• Collaborate with colleagues on innovative projects or research initiatives.
• Embrace new technologies and tools by experimenting with them in your work.

Engaging in problem-solving exercises and case studies

To develop and improve your critical thinking skills as an aerospace engineer, it’s important to engage in problem-solving exercises and case studies. This will help you sharpen your analytical thinking abilities and enhance your decision-making skills. Here are some ways you can do this:

• Solve practice problems: Find practice problem sets related to aerospace engineering and work through them. This will help you apply your knowledge and develop your problem-solving skills.
• Participate in case studies: Engage in case studies that simulate real-world scenarios faced by aerospace engineers. Analyze the situation, evaluate different options, and come up with well-reasoned solutions.
• Collaborate with peers: Work on group projects or study in a team setting where you can discuss and solve complex problems together. This will expose you to different perspectives and improve your collaborative problem-solving abilities.
• Attend workshops or seminars: Look for workshops or seminars that focus on critical thinking in the aerospace engineering field. These events often include interactive sessions where you can practice solving problems in a structured environment.
• Apply critical thinking to everyday situations: Practice using critical thinking skills in your daily life by questioning assumptions, analyzing information, and considering alternative perspectives. This will help you develop a habit of critical thinking that can be applied to your work as an aerospace engineer.

Practicing critical thinking in everyday situations

To become a successful aerospace engineer, it is important to practice critical thinking in everyday situations. Here’s how you can develop and improve this skill:

• Analyze problems: Take time to analyze problems that you encounter in your daily life. Break them down into smaller parts and think about possible solutions.
• Evaluate information: When you come across new information, ask yourself questions like “Is this reliable?” or “What evidence supports this?” This will help you develop the ability to evaluate information critically.
• Consider different perspectives: Try to see things from different points of view. This will help you understand complex issues better and make more informed decisions.
• Ask questions: Don’t be afraid to ask questions when faced with a problem or task. Asking questions helps you gather more information and seek clarity.
• Seek feedback: Actively seek feedback from others on your ideas and solutions. This will not only help you refine your thinking but also expose you to different perspectives.

In conclusion, critical thinking skills are essential for aerospace engineers to excel in their field. They need to be able to analyze problems, find creative solutions, and evaluate different options.

By continuously developing and improving these skills, aerospace engineers can effectively contribute to the design and development of aircraft and spacecraft, ensuring safety and innovation in the industry.

So if you’re aspiring to be an aerospace engineer, honing your critical thinking abilities will play a significant role in your success.

1. Why is critical thinking important for aerospace engineering?

Critical thinking is key in aerospace engineering because it helps engineers solve problems and make good decisions.

2. What are the main skills needed for aerospace engineering?

For aerospace engineering, you need problem solving skills, a good understanding of math and science, and the ability to think clearly about complex issues.

3. What kind of person should be an aerospace engineer?

A person who wants to be an aerospace engineer needs a sharp mind, problem-solving ability, strong will power and must have interest in space and flight technology.

4. How do aeronautical engineers use their problem-solving abilities?

Aeronautical Engineers apply their problem-solving abilities to design aircrafts, test prototypes and fix any issues that come up during the process.

Related Articles

• Do Aerospace Engineers Do Research?
• How to Network in the Aviation Industry?

Recent Posts

Key Systems Engineering Statistics

Are you wondering about the future of systems engineering and your place in it? One interesting fact is that there are over 12,911 control systems engineers currently employed in the United...

Hot Research Topics In Systems Engineering

Are you wondering what the cutting-edge topics are in systems engineering today? Here's an interesting fact: at Cornell University, students and researchers are pushing boundaries in areas like...

• Kindle Store
• Kindle eBooks
• Science & Math

Promotions apply when you purchase

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

Buy for others

Buying and sending ebooks to others.

• Select quantity
• Buy and send eBooks
• Recipients can read on any device

These ebooks can only be redeemed by recipients in the US. Redemption links and eBooks cannot be resold.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Critical Thinking Skills for Engineers -- Book 1 -- Analytical Skills Kindle Edition

• Print length 26 pages
• Language English
• Sticky notes On Kindle Scribe
• Publication date June 27, 2019
• File size 882 KB
• Page Flip Enabled
• Word Wise Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting Enabled
• See all details

Customers who bought this item also bought

Product details

• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07TMZPPLL
• Publisher ‏ : ‎ IEEE-USA (June 27, 2019)
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 882 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 26 pages
• #3,034 in 45-Minute Self-Help Short Reads
• #4,554 in General Technology & Reference
• #21,184 in Technology (Books)

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

No customer reviews

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Become an Amazon Hub Partner
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

WHY CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS ARE IMPORTANT FOR ENGINEERS?

What is critical thinking why are critical thinking skills important.

Critical thinking is the ability to remain analytical while forming a connection between ideas. Critical thinking skills are required to solve real life problems.

It is the subject of much debate; advocated by some of the earliest philosophers like Socrates, Chanakya, and Plato. Seventeenth-century English philosopher and statesman, Sir Francis Bacon was seriously concerned with the way we misuse our minds in the pursuit of knowledge. He understood that our minds are notorious objects and should not be allowed to succumb to their natural tendencies. 

In the present era, we live in a world full of information and as we human beings are multi-tasking, problems arise in the processing of information. As the Best B.Tech. College in Jaipur , we understand the importance of critical thinking in the process of decision-making. This not only assists engineering graduates to make the right decision but also raises them as responsible and evaluative human beings. 

Critical thinking can be referred to as the ability to remain analytical while connecting different ideas to draw useful results. Critical thinking should be intrinsic to an engineer’s mental faculty as it complements the other attributes needed for the role and is a crucial factor for exceptional outcomes. 

Also Read – Theoretical and Practical Approach Best for You

Primary Objective of Critical Thinking Skills

One primary goal of higher education has always been to inculcate the habit of critical thinking among students, to raise them as responsible, evaluative human beings. In India, where engineering seems to be one of the most sought-after professions for job security and remuneration, engineers themselves seem to have fallen deep into the rabbit hole of technical knowledge. 

Moreover being the Top Engineering College in Rajasthan , they sit in front of their computer screens, coding their way through life with blinkers on, shutting off every bit of analytical contemplation. Thus, critical thinking is a process of rationalizing, which is:

• Self-directed
• Self-disciplined
• Self-monitored
• Self-corrective 

Need of Critical Thinking Skills

For engineering graduates and budding engineers, the development of critical thinking skills is of utmost significance as it enables to achieve:

• Clarity of actions
• Practical thinking
• Attentiveness
• Systematic decision making

Studies have shown that engineering professionals who practice critical thinking skills can do better at both the personal and professional levels. For instance, specific fields of engineering demand such skills from students. These are:

• Telecommunication
• information and communication technology
• machine learning
• Mechatronics
• Other associated areas 

Also Read – Common Challenges faced by Engineering Students

Observations show that engineers who practice critical thinking are far better in their professional and personal lives. At Arya College, Jaipur , we emphasize that students should learn and inculcate critical thinking skills. This will allow them to transform data into a relevant piece of information that can be easily interpreted for obtaining necessary outcomes. Moreover, as learning is a continuous and lifelong process, critical thinking skills will improve with time. 

Future engineers who are equipped with such exceptional skills will have a competitive edge over their colleagues and peers both at the professional and personal levels respectively. In addition to this, critical thinking skills cannot be developed or learned overnight as it is the responsibility of the higher education institutions to provide the right environment to the students where such skills can be fostered and inculcated.

About The Author

Arya College

You said it perfectly.

Whoa a good deal of superb knowledge!

Excellent material, With thanks!

Thanks a lot. An abundance of advice.

Critical Thinking Skills for Engineers - Book 3: On Creativity

Ieee account.

• Change Username/Password
• Update Address

Purchase Details

• Payment Options
• Order History
• View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

• Communications Preferences
• Profession and Education
• Technical Interests
• US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
• Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
• Contact & Support
• About IEEE Xplore
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Nondiscrimination Policy
• Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Why Engineers Should Study Philosophy

• Marco Argenti

Understanding the “why” before you start working on the “how” is a critical skill — especially in the age of AI.

The ability to develop crisp mental models around the problems you want to solve and understanding the why before you start working on the how is an increasingly critical skill, especially in the age of AI. Coding is one of the things AI does best and its capabilities are quickly improving. However, there’s a catch: Code created by an AI can be syntactically and semantically correct but not functionally correct. In other words, it can work well, but not do what you want it to do. Having a crisp mental model around a problem, being able to break it down into steps that are tractable, perfect first-principle thinking, sometimes being prepared (and able to) debate a stubborn AI — these are the skills that will make a great engineer in the future, and likely the same consideration applies to many job categories.

I recently told my daughter, a college student: If you want to pursue a career in engineering, you should focus on learning philosophy in addition to traditional engineering coursework. Why? Because it will improve your code.

• MA Marco Argenti is the Chief Information Officer at Goldman Sachs.

Partner Center

8 Essential Skills Aspiring Prompt Engineers Must Have

T alking to AI is trickier than newbies assume. Writing prompts for complex, multi-step tasks requires good communication skills and a solid understanding of language models. AI relies solely on the input provided. It won’t generate optimal output if you feed it vague, ambiguous directions.

Learn to write clear, precise prompts. Here are eight hard and soft skills that prompt engineers must focus on when upskilling.

1. Critical Thinking

AI systems can quickly analyze input. They only need minutes to spot patterns, themes, and inconsistencies hidden in large volumes of data. Meanwhile, manually sifting through the same figures might take days.

Despite their speed, you shouldn’t wholly rely on AI tools for analyses and evaluations. Their reports are limited to their datasets. AI provides output based on what it has been trained on—it doesn’t analyze and observe problems the way humans do. Laying down raw data might cause errors.

To produce optimal results, feed your tools precise, detailed prompts. Use your critical skills to solve potential roadblocks right from the get-go. Leave no room for error—AI only takes input at face value.

2. Numeracy

Systems using advanced language models were trained on vast datasets, including mathematical formulas. They solve basic to intermediate arithmetic equations within minutes.

This example below shows ChatGPT answering an intermediate-level Algebra question correctly.

While AI tools also solve complex equations, e.g., statistics, calculus, or physics, they’re not always accurate. AI only runs formulas it understands. Errors might arise if the platform uses the wrong equation or misreads numerical patterns.

This example shows ChatGPT incorrectly answering a simple statistics problem. The answer should be 50 percent.

To compensate for AI’s inaccuracies, prompt engineers must have excellent numeracy. Spot mathematical errors yourself. Most AI tools improve their accuracy if you provide them with more context in the prompts. Your instructions should indicate the correct formulas or patterns.

3. Good Communication

Language models use English-based syntax. So whether you’re crafting user-generated input or predetermined instructions, good communication skills will help you convey messages. Simple tasks are easy to execute. You can ask general knowledge questions and one-step commands outright. Just indicate them in your prompt.

On the contrary, complex, multi-step projects require more detailed instructions. You must clearly explain your orders step by step to boost precision and accuracy. Vague prompts confuse AI.

If AI misinterprets you, try changing your word choice and phrasing. Minimize ambiguity by replacing weak verbs, breaking down instructions, predicting patterns, and setting trigger phrases.

Take this prompt as an example. It explicitly outlines orders to ensure that ChatGPT provides the expected output, even if it must bypass restrictions.

4. Attention to Detail

Prompt engineers need a keen eye for detail. Overlooking typos and omissions compromises accuracy, especially when executing multi-step projects. You’ll keep getting subpar outputs until you resolve them.

While meticulousness is an inherent, intangible trait, adults can still develop it. There are several ways to practice soft skills online . For prompt engineering, start by editing brief prompts under 100 words—correct typos, ambiguous terms, and vague phrasing.

Work on longer, more complex prompts as your skills improve. To streamline analyses, turn your revisions and their generated outputs into diagrams. You’ll lose track of combinations otherwise.

Also, note that language models react differently to prompts. If you plan on integrating multiple platforms for one complex task, you might have to rephrase specific instructions. Consider your tools’ datasets, limitations, and capabilities.

5. Versatility

AI has significantly evolved over the past few years. Global tech leaders like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI have already released their language models, and they’re still working on new language model projects. You can expect more AI tools to hit the market soon.

Although exciting and innovative, some might find the fast-paced evolution of AI overwhelming. Even Elon Musk calls for a pause in AI development . Newly introduced platforms overtake more popular competitors after just weeks of performing well.

For prompt engineers, the best approach is to study multiple platforms. Apart from keeping up with new AI tools, know how to write prompts for their language models. Don’t focus on one platform—any AI product could become obsolete.

6. Teamwork

Apart from honing technical skills, aspiring prompt engineers must also learn to be team players. AI development isn’t a one-person job. Most projects will require you to collaborate with other specialists, like programmers, AI trainers, and UX designers.

Familiarize yourself with the different areas of AI. Knowing your teammates’ tasks and roles lets you provide better support. Help them meet their goals. Create a streamlined system wherein they review your prompts and suggest improvements.

But instead of sending emails back and forth, consider using project management tools . They let you track, assign, and edit prompts in one platform. It’s a more organized approach than forwarding revisions and sending carbon copies to third parties.

7. Coding and Programming

Prompt engineers should at least learn basic coding. Knowing the programming languages that AI developers use will help you write more effective, precise prompts. Ensure your instructions suit each model’s unique capabilities.

Also, use the Open AI Playground to explore the application of programming languages with LLMs. It lets you test different GPT-3 models. You can structure prompts more efficiently if you understand how AI processes inputs.

8. A/B Testing

Several factors affect prompt accuracy. Changing your tone, language, phrasing, and data consistency triggers different outputs. Unfortunately, AI won’t execute your instructed tasks unless you use the correct formulas.

Take this conversation as an example. ChatGPT rejected our simple request because it violated its terms of use.

After altering the prompt, we received our desired response. ChatGPT ignored its restrictions and prioritized our requests—even if doing so violated OpenAI’s policies.

This example shows what minor alterations do to brief prompts. Simple changes can be done quickly. However, if you need to modify complex prompts spanning thousands of words, expect to spend more time on A/B testing. See which variables impact output accuracy the most.

Keep track of all your results. A/B testing takes up much time and resources—avoid repeating comparison tests when possible.

Build the Skill Set of a Professional Prompt Engineer

The above skills will help you craft more detailed, precise instructions for multi-step projects. Anyone can make ChatGPT answer general questions. But conditioning language models to produce specific output and recognize patterns requires precision.

Just note that prompt engineering goes beyond upskilling. Once you have the necessary skills, start looking for job openings, research the appropriate rates, and study industry trends. Make sure you can utilize the latest industry developments.

Massac County High School Teacher Megan Musselman, center, helps students brainstorm ideas during EcoThink’s “Fast Fashion” sustainability challenge. Teams of students were asked to think of ways to reduce, reuse or recycle clothing, tackling an emerging environmental problem.

PADUCAH, Ky. – Local high school students from western Kentucky and southern Illinois put their problem solving skills to the test during the annual EcoThink project, challenging themselves to address environmental and sustainability issues through critical thinking exercises focused on teamwork and engineering concepts.

“The students really enjoyed this opportunity,” Paducah Tilghman High School Teacher Amy Clark said. “They liked seeing other students’ thought processes and ideas. One student said the word engineering frightened her but realized it wasn't as scary as she thought.”

This year’s project focused on a “Fast Fashion” challenge and the environmental impact of manufacturing cheap, limited-use clothing. Students were tasked with finding ways to reduce, reuse or recycle clothing by determining buying habits, back-to-school shopping needs and how to impact culture changes with their peers. Solutions presented by the teams included creating a phone application and distribution centers for renting clothes and designing clothing that can be modified depending on the season or style.

The EcoThink project was led by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office deactivation and remediation contractor Four Rivers Nuclear Partnership (FRNP).

“EcoThink is a great way to emphasize DOE’s mission for sustainability to students in the region,” EM Paducah Site Lead April Ladd said. “Not only does it bring awareness to real world problems, but by encouraging students to think about these problems, they may consider a career in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), which will be critical as the next generation workforce is developed.”

EcoThink, which was featured at the 2024 Waste Management Symposia ’s STEMZone, is conducted through a partnership between Sprocket, Inc. and University of Kentucky College of Engineering and sponsored by FRNP.

“Each year, I am impressed with the ingenuity displayed by the students who participate in EcoThink,” FRNP Program Manager Myrna Redfield said. “We appreciate all the teachers and volunteers who come together to make this event possible and look forward to growing and improving the program in the future.”

-Contributor: Dylan Nichols

To receive the latest news and updates about the Office of Environment Management, submit your e-mail address.