how to do a research abstract

Writing an Abstract for Your Research Paper

Definition and Purpose of Abstracts

An abstract is a short summary of your (published or unpublished) research paper, usually about a paragraph (c. 6-7 sentences, 150-250 words) long. A well-written abstract serves multiple purposes:

• an abstract lets readers get the gist or essence of your paper or article quickly, in order to decide whether to read the full paper;
• an abstract prepares readers to follow the detailed information, analyses, and arguments in your full paper;
• and, later, an abstract helps readers remember key points from your paper.

It’s also worth remembering that search engines and bibliographic databases use abstracts, as well as the title, to identify key terms for indexing your published paper. So what you include in your abstract and in your title are crucial for helping other researchers find your paper or article.

If you are writing an abstract for a course paper, your professor may give you specific guidelines for what to include and how to organize your abstract. Similarly, academic journals often have specific requirements for abstracts. So in addition to following the advice on this page, you should be sure to look for and follow any guidelines from the course or journal you’re writing for.

The Contents of an Abstract

Abstracts contain most of the following kinds of information in brief form. The body of your paper will, of course, develop and explain these ideas much more fully. As you will see in the samples below, the proportion of your abstract that you devote to each kind of information—and the sequence of that information—will vary, depending on the nature and genre of the paper that you are summarizing in your abstract. And in some cases, some of this information is implied, rather than stated explicitly. The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association , which is widely used in the social sciences, gives specific guidelines for what to include in the abstract for different kinds of papers—for empirical studies, literature reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical papers, methodological papers, and case studies.

Here are the typical kinds of information found in most abstracts:

• the context or background information for your research; the general topic under study; the specific topic of your research
• the central questions or statement of the problem your research addresses
• what’s already known about this question, what previous research has done or shown
• the main reason(s) , the exigency, the rationale , the goals for your research—Why is it important to address these questions? Are you, for example, examining a new topic? Why is that topic worth examining? Are you filling a gap in previous research? Applying new methods to take a fresh look at existing ideas or data? Resolving a dispute within the literature in your field? . . .
• your research and/or analytical methods
• your main findings , results , or arguments
• the significance or implications of your findings or arguments.

Your abstract should be intelligible on its own, without a reader’s having to read your entire paper. And in an abstract, you usually do not cite references—most of your abstract will describe what you have studied in your research and what you have found and what you argue in your paper. In the body of your paper, you will cite the specific literature that informs your research.

When to Write Your Abstract

Although you might be tempted to write your abstract first because it will appear as the very first part of your paper, it’s a good idea to wait to write your abstract until after you’ve drafted your full paper, so that you know what you’re summarizing.

What follows are some sample abstracts in published papers or articles, all written by faculty at UW-Madison who come from a variety of disciplines. We have annotated these samples to help you see the work that these authors are doing within their abstracts.

Choosing Verb Tenses within Your Abstract

The social science sample (Sample 1) below uses the present tense to describe general facts and interpretations that have been and are currently true, including the prevailing explanation for the social phenomenon under study. That abstract also uses the present tense to describe the methods, the findings, the arguments, and the implications of the findings from their new research study. The authors use the past tense to describe previous research.

The humanities sample (Sample 2) below uses the past tense to describe completed events in the past (the texts created in the pulp fiction industry in the 1970s and 80s) and uses the present tense to describe what is happening in those texts, to explain the significance or meaning of those texts, and to describe the arguments presented in the article.

The science samples (Samples 3 and 4) below use the past tense to describe what previous research studies have done and the research the authors have conducted, the methods they have followed, and what they have found. In their rationale or justification for their research (what remains to be done), they use the present tense. They also use the present tense to introduce their study (in Sample 3, “Here we report . . .”) and to explain the significance of their study (In Sample 3, This reprogramming . . . “provides a scalable cell source for. . .”).

Sample Abstract 1

From the social sciences.

Reporting new findings about the reasons for increasing economic homogamy among spouses

Gonalons-Pons, Pilar, and Christine R. Schwartz. “Trends in Economic Homogamy: Changes in Assortative Mating or the Division of Labor in Marriage?” Demography , vol. 54, no. 3, 2017, pp. 985-1005.

Sample Abstract 2

From the humanities.

Analyzing underground pulp fiction publications in Tanzania, this article makes an argument about the cultural significance of those publications

Emily Callaci. “Street Textuality: Socialism, Masculinity, and Urban Belonging in Tanzania’s Pulp Fiction Publishing Industry, 1975-1985.” Comparative Studies in Society and History , vol. 59, no. 1, 2017, pp. 183-210.

Sample Abstract/Summary 3

From the sciences.

Reporting a new method for reprogramming adult mouse fibroblasts into induced cardiac progenitor cells

Lalit, Pratik A., Max R. Salick, Daryl O. Nelson, Jayne M. Squirrell, Christina M. Shafer, Neel G. Patel, Imaan Saeed, Eric G. Schmuck, Yogananda S. Markandeya, Rachel Wong, Martin R. Lea, Kevin W. Eliceiri, Timothy A. Hacker, Wendy C. Crone, Michael Kyba, Daniel J. Garry, Ron Stewart, James A. Thomson, Karen M. Downs, Gary E. Lyons, and Timothy J. Kamp. “Lineage Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Proliferative Induced Cardiac Progenitor Cells by Defined Factors.” Cell Stem Cell , vol. 18, 2016, pp. 354-367.

Sample Abstract 4, a Structured Abstract

Reporting results about the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy in managing acute bacterial sinusitis, from a rigorously controlled study

Note: This journal requires authors to organize their abstract into four specific sections, with strict word limits. Because the headings for this structured abstract are self-explanatory, we have chosen not to add annotations to this sample abstract.

Wald, Ellen R., David Nash, and Jens Eickhoff. “Effectiveness of Amoxicillin/Clavulanate Potassium in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Sinusitis in Children.” Pediatrics , vol. 124, no. 1, 2009, pp. 9-15.

“OBJECTIVE: The role of antibiotic therapy in managing acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS) in children is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of high-dose amoxicillin/potassium clavulanate in the treatment of children diagnosed with ABS.

METHODS : This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Children 1 to 10 years of age with a clinical presentation compatible with ABS were eligible for participation. Patients were stratified according to age (<6 or ≥6 years) and clinical severity and randomly assigned to receive either amoxicillin (90 mg/kg) with potassium clavulanate (6.4 mg/kg) or placebo. A symptom survey was performed on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 20, and 30. Patients were examined on day 14. Children’s conditions were rated as cured, improved, or failed according to scoring rules.

RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred thirty-five children with respiratory complaints were screened for enrollment; 139 (6.5%) had ABS. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, and 56 were randomly assigned. The mean age was 6630 months. Fifty (89%) patients presented with persistent symptoms, and 6 (11%) presented with nonpersistent symptoms. In 24 (43%) children, the illness was classified as mild, whereas in the remaining 32 (57%) children it was severe. Of the 28 children who received the antibiotic, 14 (50%) were cured, 4 (14%) were improved, 4(14%) experienced treatment failure, and 6 (21%) withdrew. Of the 28children who received placebo, 4 (14%) were cured, 5 (18%) improved, and 19 (68%) experienced treatment failure. Children receiving the antibiotic were more likely to be cured (50% vs 14%) and less likely to have treatment failure (14% vs 68%) than children receiving the placebo.

CONCLUSIONS : ABS is a common complication of viral upper respiratory infections. Amoxicillin/potassium clavulanate results in significantly more cures and fewer failures than placebo, according to parental report of time to resolution.” (9)

Some Excellent Advice about Writing Abstracts for Basic Science Research Papers, by Professor Adriano Aguzzi from the Institute of Neuropathology at the University of Zurich:

Academic and Professional Writing

This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.

Analysis Papers

Reading Poetry

A Short Guide to Close Reading for Literary Analysis

Using Literary Quotations

Play Reviews

Writing a Rhetorical Précis to Analyze Nonfiction Texts

Incorporating Interview Data

Grant Proposals

Planning and Writing a Grant Proposal: The Basics

Additional Resources for Grants and Proposal Writing

Job Materials and Application Essays

Writing Personal Statements for Ph.D. Programs

• Before you begin: useful tips for writing your essay
• Guided brainstorming exercises
• Get more help with your essay
• Frequently Asked Questions

Resume Writing Tips

CV Writing Tips

Cover Letters

Business Letters

Proposals and Dissertations

Resources for Proposal Writers

Resources for Dissertators

Research Papers

Planning and Writing Research Papers

Quoting and Paraphrasing

Writing Annotated Bibliographies

Creating Poster Presentations

Thank-You Notes

Advice for Students Writing Thank-You Notes to Donors

Reading for a Review

Critical Reviews

Writing a Review of Literature

Scientific Reports

Scientific Report Format

Sample Lab Assignment

Writing for the Web

Writing an Effective Blog Post

Writing for Social Media: A Guide for Academics

Generate accurate APA citations for free

• Knowledge Base
• APA Style 7th edition
• How to write and format an APA abstract

APA Abstract (2020) | Formatting, Length, and Keywords

Published on November 6, 2020 by Raimo Streefkerk . Revised on January 17, 2024.

An APA abstract is a comprehensive summary of your paper in which you briefly address the research problem , hypotheses , methods , results , and implications of your research. It’s placed on a separate page right after the title page and is usually no longer than 250 words.

Most professional papers that are submitted for publication require an abstract. Student papers typically don’t need an abstract, unless instructed otherwise.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

How to format the abstract, how to write an apa abstract, which keywords to use, frequently asked questions, apa abstract example.

Formatting instructions

Follow these five steps to format your abstract in APA Style:

• Insert a running head (for a professional paper—not needed for a student paper) and page number.
• Set page margins to 1 inch (2.54 cm).
• Write “Abstract” (bold and centered) at the top of the page.
• Do not indent the first line.
• Double-space the text.
• Use a legible font like Times New Roman (12 pt.).
• Limit the length to 250 words.
• Indent the first line 0.5 inches.
• Write the label “Keywords:” (italicized).
• Write keywords in lowercase letters.
• Separate keywords with commas.
• Do not use a period after the keywords.

Scribbr Citation Checker New

The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:

• Missing commas and periods
• Incorrect usage of “et al.”
• Ampersands (&) in narrative citations
• Missing reference entries

The abstract is a self-contained piece of text that informs the reader what your research is about. It’s best to write the abstract after you’re finished with the rest of your paper.

The questions below may help structure your abstract. Try answering them in one to three sentences each.

• What is the problem? Outline the objective, research questions , and/or hypotheses .
• What has been done? Explain your research methods .
• What did you discover? Summarize the key findings and conclusions .
• What do the findings mean? Summarize the discussion and recommendations .

Check out our guide on how to write an abstract for more guidance and an annotated example.

Guide: writing an abstract

At the end of the abstract, you may include a few keywords that will be used for indexing if your paper is published on a database. Listing your keywords will help other researchers find your work.

Choosing relevant keywords is essential. Try to identify keywords that address your topic, method, or population. APA recommends including three to five keywords.

An abstract is a concise summary of an academic text (such as a journal article or dissertation ). It serves two main purposes:

• To help potential readers determine the relevance of your paper for their own research.
• To communicate your key findings to those who don’t have time to read the whole paper.

Abstracts are often indexed along with keywords on academic databases, so they make your work more easily findable. Since the abstract is the first thing any reader sees, it’s important that it clearly and accurately summarizes the contents of your paper.

An APA abstract is around 150–250 words long. However, always check your target journal’s guidelines and don’t exceed the specified word count.

In an APA Style paper , the abstract is placed on a separate page after the title page (page 2).

Avoid citing sources in your abstract . There are two reasons for this:

• The abstract should focus on your original research, not on the work of others.
• The abstract should be self-contained and fully understandable without reference to other sources.

There are some circumstances where you might need to mention other sources in an abstract: for example, if your research responds directly to another study or focuses on the work of a single theorist. In general, though, don’t include citations unless absolutely necessary.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Streefkerk, R. (2024, January 17). APA Abstract (2020) | Formatting, Length, and Keywords. Scribbr. Retrieved March 20, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-abstract/

Is this article helpful?

Raimo Streefkerk

Other students also liked, apa headings and subheadings, apa running head, apa title page (7th edition) | template for students & professionals, unlimited academic ai-proofreading.

✔ Document error-free in 5minutes ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

• Resources Home 🏠
• Try SciSpace Copilot
• Search research papers
• Add Copilot Extension
• Try AI Detector
• Try Paraphraser
• Try Citation Generator
• April Papers
• June Papers
• July Papers

Abstract Writing: A Step-by-Step Guide With Tips & Examples

Table of Contents

Introduction

Abstracts of research papers have always played an essential role in describing your research concisely and clearly to researchers and editors of journals, enticing them to continue reading. However, with the widespread availability of scientific databases, the need to write a convincing abstract is more crucial now than during the time of paper-bound manuscripts.

Abstracts serve to "sell" your research and can be compared with your "executive outline" of a resume or, rather, a formal summary of the critical aspects of your work. Also, it can be the "gist" of your study. Since most educational research is done online, it's a sign that you have a shorter time for impressing your readers, and have more competition from other abstracts that are available to be read.

The APCI (Academic Publishing and Conferences International) articulates 12 issues or points considered during the final approval process for conferences & journals and emphasises the importance of writing an abstract that checks all these boxes (12 points). Since it's the only opportunity you have to captivate your readers, you must invest time and effort in creating an abstract that accurately reflects the critical points of your research.

With that in mind, let’s head over to understand and discover the core concept and guidelines to create a substantial abstract. Also, learn how to organise the ideas or plots into an effective abstract that will be awe-inspiring to the readers you want to reach.

What is Abstract? Definition and Overview

The word "Abstract' is derived from Latin abstractus meaning "drawn off." This etymological meaning also applies to art movements as well as music, like abstract expressionism. In this context, it refers to the revealing of the artist's intention.

Based on this, you can determine the meaning of an abstract: A condensed research summary. It must be self-contained and independent of the body of the research. However, it should outline the subject, the strategies used to study the problem, and the methods implemented to attain the outcomes. The specific elements of the study differ based on the area of study; however, together, it must be a succinct summary of the entire research paper.

Abstracts are typically written at the end of the paper, even though it serves as a prologue. In general, the abstract must be in a position to:

• Describe the paper.
• Identify the problem or the issue at hand.
• Explain to the reader the research process, the results you came up with, and what conclusion you've reached using these results.
• Include keywords to guide your strategy and the content.

Furthermore, the abstract you submit should not reflect upon any of  the following elements:

• Examine, analyse or defend the paper or your opinion.
• What you want to study, achieve or discover.
• Be redundant or irrelevant.

After reading an abstract, your audience should understand the reason - what the research was about in the first place, what the study has revealed and how it can be utilised or can be used to benefit others. You can understand the importance of abstract by knowing the fact that the abstract is the most frequently read portion of any research paper. In simpler terms, it should contain all the main points of the research paper.

What is the Purpose of an Abstract?

Abstracts are typically an essential requirement for research papers; however, it's not an obligation to preserve traditional reasons without any purpose. Abstracts allow readers to scan the text to determine whether it is relevant to their research or studies. The abstract allows other researchers to decide if your research paper can provide them with some additional information. A good abstract paves the interest of the audience to pore through your entire paper to find the content or context they're searching for.

Abstract writing is essential for indexing, as well. The Digital Repository of academic papers makes use of abstracts to index the entire content of academic research papers. Like meta descriptions in the regular Google outcomes, abstracts must include keywords that help researchers locate what they seek.

Types of Abstract

Informative and Descriptive are two kinds of abstracts often used in scientific writing.

A descriptive abstract gives readers an outline of the author's main points in their study. The reader can determine if they want to stick to the research work, based on their interest in the topic. An abstract that is descriptive is similar to the contents table of books, however, the format of an abstract depicts complete sentences encapsulated in one paragraph. It is unfortunate that the abstract can't be used as a substitute for reading a piece of writing because it's just an overview, which omits readers from getting an entire view. Also, it cannot be a way to fill in the gaps the reader may have after reading this kind of abstract since it does not contain crucial information needed to evaluate the article.

To conclude, a descriptive abstract is:

• A simple summary of the task, just summarises the work, but some researchers think it is much more of an outline
• Typically, the length is approximately 100 words. It is too short when compared to an informative abstract.
• A brief explanation but doesn't provide the reader with the complete information they need;
• An overview that omits conclusions and results

An informative abstract is a comprehensive outline of the research. There are times when people rely on the abstract as an information source. And the reason is why it is crucial to provide entire data of particular research. A well-written, informative abstract could be a good substitute for the remainder of the paper on its own.

A well-written abstract typically follows a particular style. The author begins by providing the identifying information, backed by citations and other identifiers of the papers. Then, the major elements are summarised to make the reader aware of the study. It is followed by the methodology and all-important findings from the study. The conclusion then presents study results and ends the abstract with a comprehensive summary.

In a nutshell, an informative abstract:

• Has a length that can vary, based on the subject, but is not longer than 300 words.
• Contains all the content-like methods and intentions
• Offers evidence and possible recommendations.

Informative Abstracts are more frequent than descriptive abstracts because of their extensive content and linkage to the topic specifically. You should select different types of abstracts to papers based on their length: informative abstracts for extended and more complex abstracts and descriptive ones for simpler and shorter research papers.

What are the Characteristics of a Good Abstract?

• A good abstract clearly defines the goals and purposes of the study.
• It should clearly describe the research methodology with a primary focus on data gathering, processing, and subsequent analysis.
• A good abstract should provide specific research findings.
• It presents the principal conclusions of the systematic study.
• It should be concise, clear, and relevant to the field of study.
• A well-designed abstract should be unifying and coherent.
• It is easy to grasp and free of technical jargon.
• It is written impartially and objectively.

What are the various sections of an ideal Abstract?

By now, you must have gained some concrete idea of the essential elements that your abstract needs to convey . Accordingly, the information is broken down into six key sections of the abstract, which include:

An Introduction or Background

Research methodology, objectives and goals, limitations.

Let's go over them in detail.

The introduction, also known as background, is the most concise part of your abstract. Ideally, it comprises a couple of sentences. Some researchers only write one sentence to introduce their abstract. The idea behind this is to guide readers through the key factors that led to your study.

It's understandable that this information might seem difficult to explain in a couple of sentences. For example, think about the following two questions like the background of your study:

• What is currently available about the subject with respect to the paper being discussed?
• What isn't understood about this issue? (This is the subject of your research)

While writing the abstract’s introduction, make sure that it is not lengthy. Because if it crosses the word limit, it may eat up the words meant to be used for providing other key information.

Research methodology is where you describe the theories and techniques you used in your research. It is recommended that you describe what you have done and the method you used to get your thorough investigation results. Certainly, it is the second-longest paragraph in the abstract.

In the research methodology section, it is essential to mention the kind of research you conducted; for instance, qualitative research or quantitative research (this will guide your research methodology too) . If you've conducted quantitative research, your abstract should contain information like the sample size, data collection method, sampling techniques, and duration of the study. Likewise, your abstract should reflect observational data, opinions, questionnaires (especially the non-numerical data) if you work on qualitative research.

The research objectives and goals speak about what you intend to accomplish with your research. The majority of research projects focus on the long-term effects of a project, and the goals focus on the immediate, short-term outcomes of the research. It is possible to summarise both in just multiple sentences.

In stating your objectives and goals, you give readers a picture of the scope of the study, its depth and the direction your research ultimately follows. Your readers can evaluate the results of your research against the goals and stated objectives to determine if you have achieved the goal of your research.

In the end, your readers are more attracted by the results you've obtained through your study. Therefore, you must take the time to explain each relevant result and explain how they impact your research. The results section exists as the longest in your abstract, and nothing should diminish its reach or quality.

One of the most important things you should adhere to is to spell out details and figures on the results of your research.

Instead of making a vague assertion such as, "We noticed that response rates varied greatly between respondents with high incomes and those with low incomes", Try these: "The response rate was higher for high-income respondents than those with lower incomes (59 30 percent vs. 30 percent in both cases; P<0.01)."

You're likely to encounter certain obstacles during your research. It could have been during data collection or even during conducting the sample . Whatever the issue, it's essential to inform your readers about them and their effects on the research.

Research limitations offer an opportunity to suggest further and deep research. If, for instance, you were forced to change for convenient sampling and snowball samples because of difficulties in reaching well-suited research participants, then you should mention this reason when you write your research abstract. In addition, a lack of prior studies on the subject could hinder your research.

Your conclusion should include the same number of sentences to wrap the abstract as the introduction. The majority of researchers offer an idea of the consequences of their research in this case.

Your conclusion should include three essential components:

• A significant take-home message.
• Corresponding important findings.
• The Interpretation.

Even though the conclusion of your abstract needs to be brief, it can have an enormous influence on the way that readers view your research. Therefore, make use of this section to reinforce the central message from your research. Be sure that your statements reflect the actual results and the methods you used to conduct your research.

Good Abstract Examples

Abstract example #1.

Children’s consumption behavior in response to food product placements in movies.

The abstract:

"Almost all research into the effects of brand placements on children has focused on the brand's attitudes or behavior intentions. Based on the significant differences between attitudes and behavioral intentions on one hand and actual behavior on the other hand, this study examines the impact of placements by brands on children's eating habits. Children aged 6-14 years old were shown an excerpt from the popular film Alvin and the Chipmunks and were shown places for the item Cheese Balls. Three different versions were developed with no placements, one with moderately frequent placements and the third with the highest frequency of placement. The results revealed that exposure to high-frequency places had a profound effect on snack consumption, however, there was no impact on consumer attitudes towards brands or products. The effects were not dependent on the age of the children. These findings are of major importance to researchers studying consumer behavior as well as nutrition experts as well as policy regulators."

Abstract Example #2

Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. The abstract:

"The research conducted in this study investigated the effects of Facebook use on women's moods and body image if the effects are different from an internet-based fashion journal and if the appearance comparison tendencies moderate one or more of these effects. Participants who were female ( N = 112) were randomly allocated to spend 10 minutes exploring their Facebook account or a magazine's website or an appearance neutral control website prior to completing state assessments of body dissatisfaction, mood, and differences in appearance (weight-related and facial hair, face, and skin). Participants also completed a test of the tendency to compare appearances. The participants who used Facebook were reported to be more depressed than those who stayed on the control site. In addition, women who have the tendency to compare appearances reported more facial, hair and skin-related issues following Facebook exposure than when they were exposed to the control site. Due to its popularity it is imperative to conduct more research to understand the effect that Facebook affects the way people view themselves."

Abstract Example #3

The Relationship Between Cell Phone Use and Academic Performance in a Sample of U.S. College Students

"The cellphone is always present on campuses of colleges and is often utilised in situations in which learning takes place. The study examined the connection between the use of cell phones and the actual grades point average (GPA) after adjusting for predictors that are known to be a factor. In the end 536 students in the undergraduate program from 82 self-reported majors of an enormous, public institution were studied. Hierarchical analysis ( R 2 = .449) showed that use of mobile phones is significantly ( p < .001) and negative (b equal to -.164) connected to the actual college GPA, after taking into account factors such as demographics, self-efficacy in self-regulated learning, self-efficacy to improve academic performance, and the actual high school GPA that were all important predictors ( p < .05). Therefore, after adjusting for other known predictors increasing cell phone usage was associated with lower academic performance. While more research is required to determine the mechanisms behind these results, they suggest the need to educate teachers and students to the possible academic risks that are associated with high-frequency mobile phone usage."

Quick tips on writing a good abstract

There exists a common dilemma among early age researchers whether to write the abstract at first or last? However, it's recommended to compose your abstract when you've completed the research since you'll have all the information to give to your readers. You can, however, write a draft at the beginning of your research and add in any gaps later.

If you find abstract writing a herculean task, here are the few tips to help you with it:

1. Always develop a framework to support your abstract

Before writing, ensure you create a clear outline for your abstract. Divide it into sections and draw the primary and supporting elements in each one. You can include keywords and a few sentences that convey the essence of your message.

2. Review Other Abstracts

Abstracts are among the most frequently used research documents, and thousands of them were written in the past. Therefore, prior to writing yours, take a look at some examples from other abstracts. There are plenty of examples of abstracts for dissertations in the dissertation and thesis databases.

3. Avoid Jargon To the Maximum

When you write your abstract, focus on simplicity over formality. You should  write in simple language, and avoid excessive filler words or ambiguous sentences. Keep in mind that your abstract must be readable to those who aren't acquainted with your subject.

4. Focus on Your Research

It's a given fact that the abstract you write should be about your research and the findings you've made. It is not the right time to mention secondary and primary data sources unless it's absolutely required.

Conclusion: How to Structure an Interesting Abstract?

Abstracts are a short outline of your essay. However, it's among the most important, if not the most important. The process of writing an abstract is not straightforward. A few early-age researchers tend to begin by writing it, thinking they are doing it to "tease" the next step (the document itself). However, it is better to treat it as a spoiler.

The simple, concise style of the abstract lends itself to a well-written and well-investigated study. If your research paper doesn't provide definitive results, or the goal of your research is questioned, so will the abstract. Thus, only write your abstract after witnessing your findings and put your findings in the context of a larger scenario.

The process of writing an abstract can be daunting, but with these guidelines, you will succeed. The most efficient method of writing an excellent abstract is to centre the primary points of your abstract, including the research question and goals methods, as well as key results.

Interested in learning more about dedicated research solutions? Go to the SciSpace product page to find out how our suite of products can help you simplify your research workflows so you can focus on advancing science.

The best-in-class solution is equipped with features such as literature search and discovery, profile management, research writing and formatting, and so much more.

But before you go,

You might also like.

Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research

Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences

Types of Essays in Academic Writing

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

• PLOS Biology
• PLOS Climate
• PLOS Complex Systems
• PLOS Computational Biology
• PLOS Digital Health
• PLOS Genetics
• PLOS Global Public Health
• PLOS Medicine
• PLOS Mental Health
• PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
• PLOS Pathogens
• PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
• PLOS Collections
• How to Write an Abstract

Expedite peer review, increase search-ability, and set the tone for your study

The abstract is your chance to let your readers know what they can expect from your article. Learn how to write a clear, and concise abstract that will keep your audience reading.

How your abstract impacts editorial evaluation and future readership

After the title , the abstract is the second-most-read part of your article. A good abstract can help to expedite peer review and, if your article is accepted for publication, it’s an important tool for readers to find and evaluate your work. Editors use your abstract when they first assess your article. Prospective reviewers see it when they decide whether to accept an invitation to review. Once published, the abstract gets indexed in PubMed and Google Scholar , as well as library systems and other popular databases. Like the title, your abstract influences keyword search results. Readers will use it to decide whether to read the rest of your article. Other researchers will use it to evaluate your work for inclusion in systematic reviews and meta-analysis. It should be a concise standalone piece that accurately represents your research. 

What to include in an abstract

The main challenge you’ll face when writing your abstract is keeping it concise AND fitting in all the information you need. Depending on your subject area the journal may require a structured abstract following specific headings. A structured abstract helps your readers understand your study more easily. If your journal doesn’t require a structured abstract it’s still a good idea to follow a similar format, just present the abstract as one paragraph without headings. 

Background or Introduction – What is currently known? Start with a brief, 2 or 3 sentence, introduction to the research area. 

Objectives or Aims – What is the study and why did you do it? Clearly state the research question you’re trying to answer.

Methods – What did you do? Explain what you did and how you did it. Include important information about your methods, but avoid the low-level specifics. Some disciplines have specific requirements for abstract methods. 

• CONSORT for randomized trials.
• STROBE for observational studies
• PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Results – What did you find? Briefly give the key findings of your study. Include key numeric data (including confidence intervals or p values), where possible.

Conclusions – What did you conclude? Tell the reader why your findings matter, and what this could mean for the ‘bigger picture’ of this area of research. 

Writing tips

The main challenge you may find when writing your abstract is keeping it concise AND convering all the information you need to.

• Keep it concise and to the point. Most journals have a maximum word count, so check guidelines before you write the abstract to save time editing it later.
• Write for your audience. Are they specialists in your specific field? Are they cross-disciplinary? Are they non-specialists? If you’re writing for a general audience, or your research could be of interest to the public keep your language as straightforward as possible. If you’re writing in English, do remember that not all of your readers will necessarily be native English speakers.
• Focus on key results, conclusions and take home messages.
• Write your paper first, then create the abstract as a summary.
• Check the journal requirements before you write your abstract, eg. required subheadings.
• Include keywords or phrases to help readers search for your work in indexing databases like PubMed or Google Scholar.
• Double and triple check your abstract for spelling and grammar errors. These kind of errors can give potential reviewers the impression that your research isn’t sound, and can make it easier to find reviewers who accept the invitation to review your manuscript. Your abstract should be a taste of what is to come in the rest of your article.

Don’t

• Sensationalize your research.
• Speculate about where this research might lead in the future.
• Use abbreviations or acronyms (unless absolutely necessary or unless they’re widely known, eg. DNA).
• Repeat yourself unnecessarily, eg. “Methods: We used X technique. Results: Using X technique, we found…”
• Contradict anything in the rest of your manuscript.
• Include content that isn’t also covered in the main manuscript.
• Include citations or references.

Tip: How to edit your work

Editing is challenging, especially if you are acting as both a writer and an editor. Read our guidelines for advice on how to refine your work, including useful tips for setting your intentions, re-review, and consultation with colleagues.

• How to Write a Great Title
• How to Write Your Methods
• How to Report Statistics
• How to Write Discussions and Conclusions
• How to Edit Your Work

The contents of the Peer Review Center are also available as a live, interactive training session, complete with slides, talking points, and activities. …

The contents of the Writing Center are also available as a live, interactive training session, complete with slides, talking points, and activities. …

There’s a lot to consider when deciding where to submit your work. Learn how to choose a journal that will help your study reach its audience, while reflecting your values as a researcher…

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 3. The Abstract
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

An abstract summarizes, usually in one paragraph of 300 words or less, the major aspects of the entire paper in a prescribed sequence that includes: 1) the overall purpose of the study and the research problem(s) you investigated; 2) the basic design of the study; 3) major findings or trends found as a result of your analysis; and, 4) a brief summary of your interpretations and conclusions.

Writing an Abstract. The Writing Center. Clarion University, 2009; Writing an Abstract for Your Research Paper. The Writing Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Koltay, Tibor. Abstracts and Abstracting: A Genre and Set of Skills for the Twenty-first Century . Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing, 2010;

Importance of a Good Abstract

Sometimes your professor will ask you to include an abstract, or general summary of your work, with your research paper. The abstract allows you to elaborate upon each major aspect of the paper and helps readers decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. Therefore, enough key information [e.g., summary results, observations, trends, etc.] must be included to make the abstract useful to someone who may want to examine your work.

How do you know when you have enough information in your abstract? A simple rule-of-thumb is to imagine that you are another researcher doing a similar study. Then ask yourself: if your abstract was the only part of the paper you could access, would you be happy with the amount of information presented there? Does it tell the whole story about your study? If the answer is "no" then the abstract likely needs to be revised.

Farkas, David K. “A Scheme for Understanding and Writing Summaries.” Technical Communication 67 (August 2020): 45-60;  How to Write a Research Abstract. Office of Undergraduate Research. University of Kentucky; Staiger, David L. “What Today’s Students Need to Know about Writing Abstracts.” International Journal of Business Communication January 3 (1966): 29-33; Swales, John M. and Christine B. Feak. Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Types of Abstracts

To begin, you need to determine which type of abstract you should include with your paper. There are four general types.

Critical Abstract A critical abstract provides, in addition to describing main findings and information, a judgment or comment about the study’s validity, reliability, or completeness. The researcher evaluates the paper and often compares it with other works on the same subject. Critical abstracts are generally 400-500 words in length due to the additional interpretive commentary. These types of abstracts are used infrequently.

Descriptive Abstract A descriptive abstract indicates the type of information found in the work. It makes no judgments about the work, nor does it provide results or conclusions of the research. It does incorporate key words found in the text and may include the purpose, methods, and scope of the research. Essentially, the descriptive abstract only describes the work being summarized. Some researchers consider it an outline of the work, rather than a summary. Descriptive abstracts are usually very short, 100 words or less. Informative Abstract The majority of abstracts are informative. While they still do not critique or evaluate a work, they do more than describe it. A good informative abstract acts as a surrogate for the work itself. That is, the researcher presents and explains all the main arguments and the important results and evidence in the paper. An informative abstract includes the information that can be found in a descriptive abstract [purpose, methods, scope] but it also includes the results and conclusions of the research and the recommendations of the author. The length varies according to discipline, but an informative abstract is usually no more than 300 words in length.

Highlight Abstract A highlight abstract is specifically written to attract the reader’s attention to the study. No pretense is made of there being either a balanced or complete picture of the paper and, in fact, incomplete and leading remarks may be used to spark the reader’s interest. In that a highlight abstract cannot stand independent of its associated article, it is not a true abstract and, therefore, rarely used in academic writing.

II.  Writing Style

Use the active voice when possible , but note that much of your abstract may require passive sentence constructions. Regardless, write your abstract using concise, but complete, sentences. Get to the point quickly and always use the past tense because you are reporting on a study that has been completed.

Abstracts should be formatted as a single paragraph in a block format and with no paragraph indentations. In most cases, the abstract page immediately follows the title page. Do not number the page. Rules set forth in writing manual vary but, in general, you should center the word "Abstract" at the top of the page with double spacing between the heading and the abstract. The final sentences of an abstract concisely summarize your study’s conclusions, implications, or applications to practice and, if appropriate, can be followed by a statement about the need for additional research revealed from the findings.

Composing Your Abstract

Although it is the first section of your paper, the abstract should be written last since it will summarize the contents of your entire paper. A good strategy to begin composing your abstract is to take whole sentences or key phrases from each section of the paper and put them in a sequence that summarizes the contents. Then revise or add connecting phrases or words to make the narrative flow clearly and smoothly. Note that statistical findings should be reported parenthetically [i.e., written in parentheses].

Before handing in your final paper, check to make sure that the information in the abstract completely agrees with what you have written in the paper. Think of the abstract as a sequential set of complete sentences describing the most crucial information using the fewest necessary words. The abstract SHOULD NOT contain:

• A catchy introductory phrase, provocative quote, or other device to grab the reader's attention,
• Lengthy background or contextual information,
• Redundant phrases, unnecessary adverbs and adjectives, and repetitive information;
• Acronyms or abbreviations,
• References to other literature [say something like, "current research shows that..." or "studies have indicated..."],
• Using ellipticals [i.e., ending with "..."] or incomplete sentences,
• Jargon or terms that may be confusing to the reader,
• Citations to other works, and
• Any sort of image, illustration, figure, or table, or references to them.

Abstract. Writing Center. University of Kansas; Abstract. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Abstracts. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Borko, Harold and Seymour Chatman. "Criteria for Acceptable Abstracts: A Survey of Abstracters' Instructions." American Documentation 14 (April 1963): 149-160; Abstracts. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Hartley, James and Lucy Betts. "Common Weaknesses in Traditional Abstracts in the Social Sciences." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (October 2009): 2010-2018; Koltay, Tibor. Abstracts and Abstracting: A Genre and Set of Skills for the Twenty-first Century. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing, 2010; Procter, Margaret. The Abstract. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Riordan, Laura. “Mastering the Art of Abstracts.” The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 115 (January 2015 ): 41-47; Writing Report Abstracts. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Writing Abstracts. Writing Tutorial Services, Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. Indiana University; Koltay, Tibor. Abstracts and Abstracting: A Genre and Set of Skills for the Twenty-First Century . Oxford, UK: 2010; Writing an Abstract for Your Research Paper. The Writing Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Writing Tip

Never Cite Just the Abstract!

Citing to just a journal article's abstract does not confirm for the reader that you have conducted a thorough or reliable review of the literature. If the full-text is not available, go to the USC Libraries main page and enter the title of the article [NOT the title of the journal]. If the Libraries have a subscription to the journal, the article should appear with a link to the full-text or to the journal publisher page where you can get the article. If the article does not appear, try searching Google Scholar using the link on the USC Libraries main page. If you still can't find the article after doing this, contact a librarian or you can request it from our free i nterlibrary loan and document delivery service .

• << Previous: Research Process Video Series
• Next: Executive Summary >>
• Last Updated: Mar 19, 2024 11:03 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

• Privacy Policy

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Research Paper Abstract – Writing Guide and Examples

Research Paper Abstract – Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

Research Paper Abstract

Research Paper Abstract is a brief summary of a research pape r that describes the study’s purpose, methods, findings, and conclusions . It is often the first section of the paper that readers encounter, and its purpose is to provide a concise and accurate overview of the paper’s content. The typical length of an abstract is usually around 150-250 words, and it should be written in a concise and clear manner.

Research Paper Abstract Structure

The structure of a research paper abstract usually includes the following elements:

• Background or Introduction: Briefly describe the problem or research question that the study addresses.
• Methods : Explain the methodology used to conduct the study, including the participants, materials, and procedures.
• Results : Summarize the main findings of the study, including statistical analyses and key outcomes.
• Conclusions : Discuss the implications of the study’s findings and their significance for the field, as well as any limitations or future directions for research.
• Keywords : List a few keywords that describe the main topics or themes of the research.

How to Write Research Paper Abstract

Here are the steps to follow when writing a research paper abstract:

• Start by reading your paper: Before you write an abstract, you should have a complete understanding of your paper. Read through the paper carefully, making sure you understand the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions.
• Identify the key components : Identify the key components of your paper, such as the research question, methods used, results obtained, and conclusion reached.
• Write a draft: Write a draft of your abstract, using concise and clear language. Make sure to include all the important information, but keep it short and to the point. A good rule of thumb is to keep your abstract between 150-250 words.
• Use clear and concise language : Use clear and concise language to explain the purpose of your study, the methods used, the results obtained, and the conclusions drawn.
• Emphasize your findings: Emphasize your findings in the abstract, highlighting the key results and the significance of your study.
• Revise and edit: Once you have a draft, revise and edit it to ensure that it is clear, concise, and free from errors.
• Check the formatting: Finally, check the formatting of your abstract to make sure it meets the requirements of the journal or conference where you plan to submit it.

Research Paper Abstract Examples

Research Paper Abstract Examples could be following:

Title : “The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Treating Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis”

Abstract : This meta-analysis examines the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating anxiety disorders. Through the analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials, we found that CBT is a highly effective treatment for anxiety disorders, with large effect sizes across a range of anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. Our findings support the use of CBT as a first-line treatment for anxiety disorders and highlight the importance of further research to identify the mechanisms underlying its effectiveness.

Title : “Exploring the Role of Parental Involvement in Children’s Education: A Qualitative Study”

Abstract : This qualitative study explores the role of parental involvement in children’s education. Through in-depth interviews with 20 parents of children in elementary school, we found that parental involvement takes many forms, including volunteering in the classroom, helping with homework, and communicating with teachers. We also found that parental involvement is influenced by a range of factors, including parent and child characteristics, school culture, and socio-economic status. Our findings suggest that schools and educators should prioritize building strong partnerships with parents to support children’s academic success.

Title : “The Impact of Exercise on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”

Abstract : This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature on the impact of exercise on cognitive function in older adults. Through the analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials, we found that exercise is associated with significant improvements in cognitive function, particularly in the domains of executive function and attention. Our findings highlight the potential of exercise as a non-pharmacological intervention to support cognitive health in older adults.

When to Write Research Paper Abstract

The abstract of a research paper should typically be written after you have completed the main body of the paper. This is because the abstract is intended to provide a brief summary of the key points and findings of the research, and you can’t do that until you have completed the research and written about it in detail.

Once you have completed your research paper, you can begin writing your abstract. It is important to remember that the abstract should be a concise summary of your research paper, and should be written in a way that is easy to understand for readers who may not have expertise in your specific area of research.

Purpose of Research Paper Abstract

The purpose of a research paper abstract is to provide a concise summary of the key points and findings of a research paper. It is typically a brief paragraph or two that appears at the beginning of the paper, before the introduction, and is intended to give readers a quick overview of the paper’s content.

The abstract should include a brief statement of the research problem, the methods used to investigate the problem, the key results and findings, and the main conclusions and implications of the research. It should be written in a clear and concise manner, avoiding jargon and technical language, and should be understandable to a broad audience.

The abstract serves as a way to quickly and easily communicate the main points of a research paper to potential readers, such as academics, researchers, and students, who may be looking for information on a particular topic. It can also help researchers determine whether a paper is relevant to their own research interests and whether they should read the full paper.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Research Paper Conclusion – Writing Guide and...

Appendices – Writing Guide, Types and Examples

How to Cite Research Paper – All Formats and...

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Scope of the Research – Writing Guide and...

Research Contribution – Thesis Guide

What this handout is about

This handout provides definitions and examples of the two main types of abstracts: descriptive and informative. It also provides guidelines for constructing an abstract and general tips for you to keep in mind when drafting. Finally, it includes a few examples of abstracts broken down into their component parts.

What is an abstract?

An abstract is a self-contained, short, and powerful statement that describes a larger work. Components vary according to discipline. An abstract of a social science or scientific work may contain the scope, purpose, results, and contents of the work. An abstract of a humanities work may contain the thesis, background, and conclusion of the larger work. An abstract is not a review, nor does it evaluate the work being abstracted. While it contains key words found in the larger work, the abstract is an original document rather than an excerpted passage.

Why write an abstract?

You may write an abstract for various reasons. The two most important are selection and indexing. Abstracts allow readers who may be interested in a longer work to quickly decide whether it is worth their time to read it. Also, many online databases use abstracts to index larger works. Therefore, abstracts should contain keywords and phrases that allow for easy searching.

Say you are beginning a research project on how Brazilian newspapers helped Brazil’s ultra-liberal president Luiz Ignácio da Silva wrest power from the traditional, conservative power base. A good first place to start your research is to search Dissertation Abstracts International for all dissertations that deal with the interaction between newspapers and politics. “Newspapers and politics” returned 569 hits. A more selective search of “newspapers and Brazil” returned 22 hits. That is still a fair number of dissertations. Titles can sometimes help winnow the field, but many titles are not very descriptive. For example, one dissertation is titled “Rhetoric and Riot in Rio de Janeiro.” It is unclear from the title what this dissertation has to do with newspapers in Brazil. One option would be to download or order the entire dissertation on the chance that it might speak specifically to the topic. A better option is to read the abstract. In this case, the abstract reveals the main focus of the dissertation:

This dissertation examines the role of newspaper editors in the political turmoil and strife that characterized late First Empire Rio de Janeiro (1827-1831). Newspaper editors and their journals helped change the political culture of late First Empire Rio de Janeiro by involving the people in the discussion of state. This change in political culture is apparent in Emperor Pedro I’s gradual loss of control over the mechanisms of power. As the newspapers became more numerous and powerful, the Emperor lost his legitimacy in the eyes of the people. To explore the role of the newspapers in the political events of the late First Empire, this dissertation analyzes all available newspapers published in Rio de Janeiro from 1827 to 1831. Newspapers and their editors were leading forces in the effort to remove power from the hands of the ruling elite and place it under the control of the people. In the process, newspapers helped change how politics operated in the constitutional monarchy of Brazil.

From this abstract you now know that although the dissertation has nothing to do with modern Brazilian politics, it does cover the role of newspapers in changing traditional mechanisms of power. After reading the abstract, you can make an informed judgment about whether the dissertation would be worthwhile to read.

Besides selection, the other main purpose of the abstract is for indexing. Most article databases in the online catalog of the library enable you to search abstracts. This allows for quick retrieval by users and limits the extraneous items recalled by a “full-text” search. However, for an abstract to be useful in an online retrieval system, it must incorporate the key terms that a potential researcher would use to search. For example, if you search Dissertation Abstracts International using the keywords “France” “revolution” and “politics,” the search engine would search through all the abstracts in the database that included those three words. Without an abstract, the search engine would be forced to search titles, which, as we have seen, may not be fruitful, or else search the full text. It’s likely that a lot more than 60 dissertations have been written with those three words somewhere in the body of the entire work. By incorporating keywords into the abstract, the author emphasizes the central topics of the work and gives prospective readers enough information to make an informed judgment about the applicability of the work.

When do people write abstracts?

• when submitting articles to journals, especially online journals
• when applying for research grants
• when writing a book proposal
• when completing the Ph.D. dissertation or M.A. thesis
• when writing a proposal for a conference paper
• when writing a proposal for a book chapter

Most often, the author of the entire work (or prospective work) writes the abstract. However, there are professional abstracting services that hire writers to draft abstracts of other people’s work. In a work with multiple authors, the first author usually writes the abstract. Undergraduates are sometimes asked to draft abstracts of books/articles for classmates who have not read the larger work.

Types of abstracts

There are two types of abstracts: descriptive and informative. They have different aims, so as a consequence they have different components and styles. There is also a third type called critical, but it is rarely used. If you want to find out more about writing a critique or a review of a work, see the UNC Writing Center handout on writing a literature review . If you are unsure which type of abstract you should write, ask your instructor (if the abstract is for a class) or read other abstracts in your field or in the journal where you are submitting your article.

Descriptive abstracts

A descriptive abstract indicates the type of information found in the work. It makes no judgments about the work, nor does it provide results or conclusions of the research. It does incorporate key words found in the text and may include the purpose, methods, and scope of the research. Essentially, the descriptive abstract describes the work being abstracted. Some people consider it an outline of the work, rather than a summary. Descriptive abstracts are usually very short—100 words or less.

Informative abstracts

The majority of abstracts are informative. While they still do not critique or evaluate a work, they do more than describe it. A good informative abstract acts as a surrogate for the work itself. That is, the writer presents and explains all the main arguments and the important results and evidence in the complete article/paper/book. An informative abstract includes the information that can be found in a descriptive abstract (purpose, methods, scope) but also includes the results and conclusions of the research and the recommendations of the author. The length varies according to discipline, but an informative abstract is rarely more than 10% of the length of the entire work. In the case of a longer work, it may be much less.

Here are examples of a descriptive and an informative abstract of this handout on abstracts . Descriptive abstract:

The two most common abstract types—descriptive and informative—are described and examples of each are provided.

Informative abstract:

Abstracts present the essential elements of a longer work in a short and powerful statement. The purpose of an abstract is to provide prospective readers the opportunity to judge the relevance of the longer work to their projects. Abstracts also include the key terms found in the longer work and the purpose and methods of the research. Authors abstract various longer works, including book proposals, dissertations, and online journal articles. There are two main types of abstracts: descriptive and informative. A descriptive abstract briefly describes the longer work, while an informative abstract presents all the main arguments and important results. This handout provides examples of various types of abstracts and instructions on how to construct one.

Which type should I use?

Your best bet in this case is to ask your instructor or refer to the instructions provided by the publisher. You can also make a guess based on the length allowed; i.e., 100-120 words = descriptive; 250+ words = informative.

How do I write an abstract?

The format of your abstract will depend on the work being abstracted. An abstract of a scientific research paper will contain elements not found in an abstract of a literature article, and vice versa. However, all abstracts share several mandatory components, and there are also some optional parts that you can decide to include or not. When preparing to draft your abstract, keep the following key process elements in mind:

• Reason for writing: What is the importance of the research? Why would a reader be interested in the larger work?
• Problem: What problem does this work attempt to solve? What is the scope of the project? What is the main argument/thesis/claim?
• Methodology: An abstract of a scientific work may include specific models or approaches used in the larger study. Other abstracts may describe the types of evidence used in the research.
• Results: Again, an abstract of a scientific work may include specific data that indicates the results of the project. Other abstracts may discuss the findings in a more general way.
• Implications: What changes should be implemented as a result of the findings of the work? How does this work add to the body of knowledge on the topic?

(This list of elements is adapted with permission from Philip Koopman, “How to Write an Abstract.” )

All abstracts include:

• A full citation of the source, preceding the abstract.
• The most important information first.
• The same type and style of language found in the original, including technical language.
• Key words and phrases that quickly identify the content and focus of the work.
• Clear, concise, and powerful language.

Abstracts may include:

• The thesis of the work, usually in the first sentence.
• Background information that places the work in the larger body of literature.
• The same chronological structure as the original work.

How not to write an abstract:

• Do not refer extensively to other works.
• Do not add information not contained in the original work.
• Do not define terms.

If you are abstracting your own writing

When abstracting your own work, it may be difficult to condense a piece of writing that you have agonized over for weeks (or months, or even years) into a 250-word statement. There are some tricks that you could use to make it easier, however.

Reverse outlining:

This technique is commonly used when you are having trouble organizing your own writing. The process involves writing down the main idea of each paragraph on a separate piece of paper– see our short video . For the purposes of writing an abstract, try grouping the main ideas of each section of the paper into a single sentence. Practice grouping ideas using webbing or color coding .

For a scientific paper, you may have sections titled Purpose, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Each one of these sections will be longer than one paragraph, but each is grouped around a central idea. Use reverse outlining to discover the central idea in each section and then distill these ideas into one statement.

Cut and paste:

To create a first draft of an abstract of your own work, you can read through the entire paper and cut and paste sentences that capture key passages. This technique is useful for social science research with findings that cannot be encapsulated by neat numbers or concrete results. A well-written humanities draft will have a clear and direct thesis statement and informative topic sentences for paragraphs or sections. Isolate these sentences in a separate document and work on revising them into a unified paragraph.

If you are abstracting someone else’s writing

When abstracting something you have not written, you cannot summarize key ideas just by cutting and pasting. Instead, you must determine what a prospective reader would want to know about the work. There are a few techniques that will help you in this process:

Identify key terms:

Search through the entire document for key terms that identify the purpose, scope, and methods of the work. Pay close attention to the Introduction (or Purpose) and the Conclusion (or Discussion). These sections should contain all the main ideas and key terms in the paper. When writing the abstract, be sure to incorporate the key terms.

Highlight key phrases and sentences:

Instead of cutting and pasting the actual words, try highlighting sentences or phrases that appear to be central to the work. Then, in a separate document, rewrite the sentences and phrases in your own words.

Don’t look back:

After reading the entire work, put it aside and write a paragraph about the work without referring to it. In the first draft, you may not remember all the key terms or the results, but you will remember what the main point of the work was. Remember not to include any information you did not get from the work being abstracted.

Revise, revise, revise

No matter what type of abstract you are writing, or whether you are abstracting your own work or someone else’s, the most important step in writing an abstract is to revise early and often. When revising, delete all extraneous words and incorporate meaningful and powerful words. The idea is to be as clear and complete as possible in the shortest possible amount of space. The Word Count feature of Microsoft Word can help you keep track of how long your abstract is and help you hit your target length.

Example 1: Humanities abstract

Kenneth Tait Andrews, “‘Freedom is a constant struggle’: The dynamics and consequences of the Mississippi Civil Rights Movement, 1960-1984” Ph.D. State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1997 DAI-A 59/02, p. 620, Aug 1998

This dissertation examines the impacts of social movements through a multi-layered study of the Mississippi Civil Rights Movement from its peak in the early 1960s through the early 1980s. By examining this historically important case, I clarify the process by which movements transform social structures and the constraints movements face when they try to do so. The time period studied includes the expansion of voting rights and gains in black political power, the desegregation of public schools and the emergence of white-flight academies, and the rise and fall of federal anti-poverty programs. I use two major research strategies: (1) a quantitative analysis of county-level data and (2) three case studies. Data have been collected from archives, interviews, newspapers, and published reports. This dissertation challenges the argument that movements are inconsequential. Some view federal agencies, courts, political parties, or economic elites as the agents driving institutional change, but typically these groups acted in response to the leverage brought to bear by the civil rights movement. The Mississippi movement attempted to forge independent structures for sustaining challenges to local inequities and injustices. By propelling change in an array of local institutions, movement infrastructures had an enduring legacy in Mississippi.

Now let’s break down this abstract into its component parts to see how the author has distilled his entire dissertation into a ~200 word abstract.

What the dissertation does This dissertation examines the impacts of social movements through a multi-layered study of the Mississippi Civil Rights Movement from its peak in the early 1960s through the early 1980s. By examining this historically important case, I clarify the process by which movements transform social structures and the constraints movements face when they try to do so.

How the dissertation does it The time period studied in this dissertation includes the expansion of voting rights and gains in black political power, the desegregation of public schools and the emergence of white-flight academies, and the rise and fall of federal anti-poverty programs. I use two major research strategies: (1) a quantitative analysis of county-level data and (2) three case studies.

What materials are used Data have been collected from archives, interviews, newspapers, and published reports.

Conclusion This dissertation challenges the argument that movements are inconsequential. Some view federal agencies, courts, political parties, or economic elites as the agents driving institutional change, but typically these groups acted in response to movement demands and the leverage brought to bear by the civil rights movement. The Mississippi movement attempted to forge independent structures for sustaining challenges to local inequities and injustices. By propelling change in an array of local institutions, movement infrastructures had an enduring legacy in Mississippi.

Keywords social movements Civil Rights Movement Mississippi voting rights desegregation

Example 2: Science Abstract

Luis Lehner, “Gravitational radiation from black hole spacetimes” Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 1998 DAI-B 59/06, p. 2797, Dec 1998

The problem of detecting gravitational radiation is receiving considerable attention with the construction of new detectors in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The theoretical modeling of the wave forms that would be produced in particular systems will expedite the search for and analysis of detected signals. The characteristic formulation of GR is implemented to obtain an algorithm capable of evolving black holes in 3D asymptotically flat spacetimes. Using compactification techniques, future null infinity is included in the evolved region, which enables the unambiguous calculation of the radiation produced by some compact source. A module to calculate the waveforms is constructed and included in the evolution algorithm. This code is shown to be second-order convergent and to handle highly non-linear spacetimes. In particular, we have shown that the code can handle spacetimes whose radiation is equivalent to a galaxy converting its whole mass into gravitational radiation in one second. We further use the characteristic formulation to treat the region close to the singularity in black hole spacetimes. The code carefully excises a region surrounding the singularity and accurately evolves generic black hole spacetimes with apparently unlimited stability.

This science abstract covers much of the same ground as the humanities one, but it asks slightly different questions.

Why do this study The problem of detecting gravitational radiation is receiving considerable attention with the construction of new detectors in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The theoretical modeling of the wave forms that would be produced in particular systems will expedite the search and analysis of the detected signals.

What the study does The characteristic formulation of GR is implemented to obtain an algorithm capable of evolving black holes in 3D asymptotically flat spacetimes. Using compactification techniques, future null infinity is included in the evolved region, which enables the unambiguous calculation of the radiation produced by some compact source. A module to calculate the waveforms is constructed and included in the evolution algorithm.

Results This code is shown to be second-order convergent and to handle highly non-linear spacetimes. In particular, we have shown that the code can handle spacetimes whose radiation is equivalent to a galaxy converting its whole mass into gravitational radiation in one second. We further use the characteristic formulation to treat the region close to the singularity in black hole spacetimes. The code carefully excises a region surrounding the singularity and accurately evolves generic black hole spacetimes with apparently unlimited stability.

Keywords gravitational radiation (GR) spacetimes black holes

Works consulted

We consulted these works while writing this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial . We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback.

Belcher, Wendy Laura. 2009. Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

Koopman, Philip. 1997. “How to Write an Abstract.” Carnegie Mellon University. October 1997. http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/essays/abstract.html .

Lancaster, F.W. 2003. Indexing And Abstracting in Theory and Practice , 3rd ed. London: Facet Publishing.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

• Affiliate Program

• UNITED STATES
• 台灣 (TAIWAN)
• TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
• Academic Editing Services
• - Research Paper
• - Journal Manuscript
• - Dissertation
• - College & University Assignments
• Admissions Editing Services
• - Application Essay
• - Personal Statement
• - Recommendation Letter
• - Cover Letter
• - CV/Resume
• Business Editing Services
• - Business Documents
• - Report & Brochure
• - Website & Blog
• Writer Editing Services
• - Script & Screenplay
• Our Editors
• Client Reviews
• Editing & Proofreading Prices
• Wordvice Points
• Partner Discount
• Plagiarism Checker
• APA Citation Generator
• MLA Citation Generator
• Chicago Citation Generator
• Vancouver Citation Generator
• - APA Style
• - MLA Style
• - Chicago Style
• - Vancouver Style
• Writing & Editing Guide
• Academic Resources
• Admissions Resources

How to Write an Abstract for a Research Paper | Examples

What is a research paper abstract?

Research paper abstracts summarize your study quickly and succinctly to journal editors and researchers and prompt them to read further. But with the ubiquity of online publication databases, writing a compelling abstract is even more important today than it was in the days of bound paper manuscripts.

Abstracts exist to “sell”  your work, and they could thus be compared to the “executive summary” of a business resume: an official briefing on what is most important about your research. Or the “gist” of your research. With the majority of academic transactions being conducted online, this means that you have even less time to impress readers–and increased competition in terms of other abstracts out there to read.

The APCI (Academic Publishing and Conferences International) notes that there are  12 questions or “points” considered in the selection process  for journals and conferences and stresses the importance of having an abstract that ticks all of these boxes. Because it is often the ONLY chance you have to convince readers to keep reading, it is important that you spend time and energy crafting an abstract that faithfully represents the central parts of your study and captivates your audience.

With that in mind, follow these suggestions when structuring and writing your abstract, and learn how exactly to put these ideas into a solid abstract that will captivate your target readers.

Before Writing Your Abstract

How long should an abstract be.

All abstracts are written with the same essential objective: to give a summary of your study. But there are two basic styles of abstract: descriptive and informative . Here is a brief delineation of the two:

Of the two types of abstracts, informative abstracts are much more common, and they are widely used for submission to journals and conferences. Informative abstracts apply to lengthier and more technical research and are common in the sciences, engineering, and psychology, while descriptive abstracts are more likely used in humanities and social science papers. The best method of determining which abstract type you need to use is to follow the instructions for journal submissions and to read as many other published articles in those journals as possible.

Research Abstract Guidelines and Requirements

As any article about research writing will tell you, authors must always closely follow the specific guidelines and requirements indicated in the Guide for Authors section of their target journal’s website. The same kind of adherence to conventions should be applied to journal publications, for consideration at a conference, and even when completing a class assignment.

Each publisher has particular demands when it comes to formatting and structure. Here are some common questions addressed in the journal guidelines:

• Is there a maximum or minimum word/character length?
• What are the style and formatting requirements?
• What is the appropriate abstract type?
• Are there any specific content or organization rules that apply?

There are of course other rules to consider when composing a research paper abstract. But if you follow the stated rules the first time you submit your manuscript, you can avoid your work being thrown in the “circular file” right off the bat.

Identify Your Target Readership

The main purpose of your abstract is to lead researchers to the full text of your research paper. In scientific journals, abstracts let readers decide whether the research discussed is relevant to their own interests or study. Abstracts also help readers understand your main argument quickly. Consider these questions as you write your abstract:

• Are other academics in your field the main target of your study?
• Will your study perhaps be useful to members of the general public?
• Do your study results include the wider implications presented in the abstract?

Outlining and Writing Your Abstract

What to include in an abstract.

Just as your  research paper title  should cover as much ground as possible in a few short words, your abstract must cover  all  parts of your study in order to fully explain your paper and research. Because it must accomplish this task in the space of only a few hundred words, it is important not to include ambiguous references or phrases that will confuse the reader or mislead them about the content and objectives of your research. Follow these  dos  and  don’ts  when it comes to what kind of writing to include:

• Avoid acronyms or abbreviations since these will need to be explained in order to make sense to the reader, which takes up valuable abstract space. Instead, explain these terms in the Introduction section of the main text.
• Only use references to people or other works if they are well-known. Otherwise, avoid referencing anything outside of your study in the abstract.
• Never include tables, figures, sources, or long quotations in your abstract; you will have plenty of time to present and refer to these in the body of your paper.

Use keywords in your abstract to focus your topic

A vital search tool is the research paper keywords section, which lists the most relevant terms directly underneath the abstract. Think of these keywords as the “tubes” that readers will seek and enter—via queries on databases and search engines—to ultimately land at their destination, which is your paper. Your abstract keywords should thus be words that are commonly used in searches but should also be highly relevant to your work and found in the text of your abstract. Include 5 to 10 important words or short phrases central to your research in both the abstract and the keywords section.

For example, if you are writing a paper on the prevalence of obesity among lower classes that crosses international boundaries, you should include terms like “obesity,” “prevalence,” “international,” “lower classes,” and “cross-cultural.” These are terms that should net a wide array of people interested in your topic of study. Look at our nine rules for choosing keywords for your research paper if you need more input on this.

Research Paper Abstract Structure

As mentioned above, the abstract (especially the informative abstract) acts as a surrogate or synopsis of your research paper, doing almost as much work as the thousands of words that follow it in the body of the main text. In the hard sciences and most social sciences, the abstract includes the following sections and organizational schema.

Each section is quite compact—only a single sentence or two, although there is room for expansion if one element or statement is particularly interesting or compelling. As the abstract is almost always one long paragraph, the individual sections should naturally merge into one another to create a holistic effect. Use the following as a checklist to ensure that you have included all of the necessary content in your abstract.

1) Identify your purpose and motivation

So your research is about rabies in Brazilian squirrels. Why is this important? You should start your abstract by explaining why people should care about this study—why is it significant to your field and perhaps to the wider world? And what is the exact purpose of your study; what are you trying to achieve? Start by answering the following questions:

• What made you decide to do this study or project?
• Why is this study important to your field or to the lay reader?
• Why should someone read your entire article?

In summary, the first section of your abstract should include the importance of the research and its impact on related research fields or on the wider scientific domain.

2) Explain the research problem you are addressing

Stating the research problem that your study addresses is the corollary to why your specific study is important and necessary. For instance, even if the issue of “rabies in Brazilian squirrels” is important, what is the problem—the “missing piece of the puzzle”—that your study helps resolve?

You can combine the problem with the motivation section, but from a perspective of organization and clarity, it is best to separate the two. Here are some precise questions to address:

• What is your research trying to better understand or what problem is it trying to solve?
• What is the scope of your study—does it try to explain something general or specific?
• What is your central claim or argument?

3) Discuss your research approach

Your specific study approach is detailed in the Methods and Materials section .  You have already established the importance of the research, your motivation for studying this issue, and the specific problem your paper addresses. Now you need to discuss  how  you solved or made progress on this problem—how you conducted your research. If your study includes your own work or that of your team, describe that here. If in your paper you reviewed the work of others, explain this here. Did you use analytic models? A simulation? A double-blind study? A case study? You are basically showing the reader the internal engine of your research machine and how it functioned in the study. Be sure to:

• Detail your research—include methods/type of the study, your variables, and the extent of the work
• Briefly present evidence to support your claim
• Highlight your most important sources

4) Briefly summarize your results

Here you will give an overview of the outcome of your study. Avoid using too many vague qualitative terms (e.g, “very,” “small,” or “tremendous”) and try to use at least some quantitative terms (i.e., percentages, figures, numbers). Save your qualitative language for the conclusion statement. Answer questions like these:

• What did your study yield in concrete terms (e.g., trends, figures, correlation between phenomena)?
• How did your results compare to your hypothesis? Was the study successful?
• Where there any highly unexpected outcomes or were they all largely predicted?

5) State your conclusion

In the last section of your abstract, you will give a statement about the implications and  limitations of the study . Be sure to connect this statement closely to your results and not the area of study in general. Are the results of this study going to shake up the scientific world? Will they impact how people see “Brazilian squirrels”? Or are the implications minor? Try not to boast about your study or present its impact as  too  far-reaching, as researchers and journals will tend to be skeptical of bold claims in scientific papers. Answer one of these questions:

• What are the exact effects of these results on my field? On the wider world?
• What other kind of study would yield further solutions to problems?
• What other information is needed to expand knowledge in this area?

After Completing the First Draft of Your Abstract

Revise your abstract.

The abstract, like any piece of academic writing, should be revised before being considered complete. Check it for  grammatical and spelling errors  and make sure it is formatted properly.

Get feedback from a peer

Getting a fresh set of eyes to review your abstract is a great way to find out whether you’ve summarized your research well. Find a reader who understands research papers but is not an expert in this field or is not affiliated with your study. Ask your reader to summarize what your study is about (including all key points of each section). This should tell you if you have communicated your key points clearly.

In addition to research peers, consider consulting with a professor or even a specialist or generalist writing center consultant about your abstract. Use any resource that helps you see your work from another perspective.

Consider getting professional editing and proofreading

While peer feedback is quite important to ensure the effectiveness of your abstract content, it may be a good idea to find an academic editor  to fix mistakes in grammar, spelling, mechanics, style, or formatting. The presence of basic errors in the abstract may not affect your content, but it might dissuade someone from reading your entire study. Wordvice provides English editing services that both correct objective errors and enhance the readability and impact of your work.

Additional Abstract Rules and Guidelines

Write your abstract after completing your paper.

Although the abstract goes at the beginning of your manuscript, it does not merely introduce your research topic (that is the job of the title), but rather summarizes your entire paper. Writing the abstract last will ensure that it is complete and consistent with the findings and statements in your paper.

Keep your content in the correct order

Both questions and answers should be organized in a standard and familiar way to make the content easier for readers to absorb. Ideally, it should mimic the overall format of your essay and the classic “introduction,” “body,” and “conclusion” form, even if the parts are not neatly divided as such.

Write the abstract from scratch

Because the abstract is a self-contained piece of writing viewed separately from the body of the paper, you should write it separately as well. Never copy and paste direct quotes from the paper and avoid paraphrasing sentences in the paper. Using new vocabulary and phrases will keep your abstract interesting and free of redundancies while conserving space.

Don’t include too many details in the abstract

Again, the density of your abstract makes it incompatible with including specific points other than possibly names or locations. You can make references to terms, but do not explain or define them in the abstract. Try to strike a balance between being specific to your study and presenting a relatively broad overview of your work.

Wordvice Resources

If you think your abstract is fine now but you need input on abstract writing or require English editing services (including paper editing ), then head over to the Wordvice academic resources page, where you will find many more articles, for example on writing the Results , Methods , and Discussion sections of your manuscript, on choosing a title for your paper , or on how to finalize your journal submission with a strong cover letter .    

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Best Family Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2023 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

How to Write an APA Abstract

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Emily is a board-certified science editor who has worked with top digital publishing brands like Voices for Biodiversity, Study.com, GoodTherapy, Vox, and Verywell.

Verywell / Nusha Ashjaee 

• Writing Your Abstract
• How to Use Keywords

An APA abstract is a concise but comprehensive summary of a scientific paper. It is typically a paragraph long, or about 150 to 250 words. The goal of the abstract is to provide the reader with a brief and accurate idea of what a paper is about.

The APA abstract should appear on a separate page immediately after the title page and before the main content of your paper. While professional papers that appear in scientific journals and other publications require an APA abstract, they may not be required for student papers. However, you should always check with your instructor for specific requirements.

What Is APA Format?

APA format is the official style of the American Psychological Association. It is used in writing for psychology and other social sciences. These style guidelines specify different aspects of a document's presentation and layout, including how pages are structured, how references are organized, and how sources are cited.

This article explains how to create an abstract in APA format for your psychology papers or other types of scientific writing. It covers the basic rules you should follow as well as specific guidelines for writing abstracts for experimental reports, literature reviews, and other articles.

What Is an Abstract in APA Format?

In addition to providing guidance for the general style and organization of a paper, APA format also stipulates using an abstract designed to briefly summarize the key details in a paper.

While it is sometimes overlooked or only an afterthought, an abstract is an integral part of any academic or professional paper. The abstract is a critical component of an APA-formatted paper. This brief overview summarizes what your paper contains. It should succinctly and accurately represent what your paper is about and what the reader can expect to find.

Following a few simple guidelines, you can create an abstract following the format. Done well, an abstract generates interest in your work and helps readers learn if the paper will interest them.

APA Format Abstract Basics

The abstract is the second page of a lab report or APA-format paper and should immediately follow the title page . Think of an abstract as a highly condensed summary of your entire paper.

The purpose of your abstract is to provide a brief yet thorough overview of your paper. It should function much like your title page—it should allow the person reading it to quickly determine what your paper is all about. Your abstract is the first thing that most people will read, and it is usually what informs their decision to read the rest of your paper.

The abstract is the single most important paragraph in your entire paper, according to the APA Publication Manual. A good abstract lets the reader know that your paper is worth reading.

According to the official guidelines of the American Psychological Association, an abstract should be brief but packed with information. Each sentence must be written with maximum impact in mind. To keep your abstract short, focus on including just four or five of the essential points, concepts, or findings.

An abstract must also be objective and accurate. The abstract's purpose is to report rather than provide commentary. It should accurately reflect what your paper is about. Only include information that is also included in the body of your paper.

Key Elements of an APA Abstract

Your abstract page should include:

• A running head , which is a shortened version of your title that appears in all caps at the top left of each page of your paper
• A section label , which should be the word "Abstract" centered and bolded at the top of the page
• A page number , which should be the second page of your paper (the title page should be page 1)
• A double-spaced paragraph of about 150 to 250 words
• An indented list of keywords related to your paper's content. Include the label "Keywords:" in italics and list three to five keywords that are separated by commas

How to Write an Abstract in APA Format

Before you write your abstract, you first need to write your paper in its entirety. In order to write a good abstract, you need to have a finished draft of your paper so you can summarize it accurately.

While the abstract will be at the beginning of your paper, it should be the last section you write.

Once you have completed the final draft of your psychology paper , use it as a guide for writing your abstract.

• Begin your abstract on a new page . Place your running head and page number 2 in the top right-hand corner. Center the word "Abstract" at the top of the page.
• Know your target word count . An abstract should be between 150 and 250 words. Exact word counts vary from journal to journal . If you are writing your paper for a psychology course, your professor may have specific word requirements, so be sure to ask. The abstract should be written as only one paragraph with no indentation.
• Structure the abstract in the same order as your paper . Begin with a brief summary of the introduction , and then continue on with a summary of the method , results , and discussion sections of your paper.
• Look at other abstracts in professional journals for examples of how to summarize your paper . Notice the main points that the authors chose to mention in the abstract. Use these examples as a guide when choosing the main ideas in your own paper.
• Write a rough draft of your abstract . Use the format required for your type of paper (see next sections). While you should aim for brevity, be careful not to make your summary too short. Try to write one to two sentences summarizing each section of your paper. Once you have a rough draft, you can edit for length and clarity.
• Ask a friend to read over the abstract . Sometimes, having someone look at your abstract with fresh eyes can provide perspective and help you spot possible typos and other errors.

The abstract is vital to your paper, so it should not be overlooked or treated as an afterthought. Spend time writing this section carefully to ensure maximum readability and clarity.

It is important to remember that while the abstract is the last thing you write, it is often the most read part of your paper.

Experimental Report Abstracts

The format of your abstract also depends on the type of paper you are writing. For example, an abstract summarizing an experimental paper will differ from that of a meta-analysis or case study . For an experimental report, your abstract should:

• Identify the problem . In many cases, you should begin by stating the question you sought to investigate and your hypothesis .
• Describe the participants in the study . State how many participants took part and how they were selected. For example: "In this study, 215 undergraduate student participants were randomly assigned to [the experimental condition] or [the control condition]."
• Describe the study method . For example, identify whether you used a within-subjects, between-subjects, or mixed design.
• Give the basic findings . This is essentially a brief preview of the results of your paper. 
• Provide any conclusions or implications of the study . What might your results indicate, and what directions does it point to for future research?

Literature Review Abstracts

If your paper is a meta-analysis or literature review, your abstract should:

• Describe the problem of interest . In other words, what is it that you set out to investigate in your analysis or review?
• Explain the criteria used to select the studies included in the paper . There may be many different studies devoted to your topic. Your analysis or review probably only looks at a portion of these studies. For what reason did you select these specific studies to include in your research?
• Identify the participants in the studies . Inform the reader about who the participants were in the studies. Were they college students? Older adults? How were they selected and assigned?
• Provide the main results . Again, this is essentially a quick peek at what readers will find when they read your results section. Don't try to include everything. Just provide a very brief summary of your main findings. 
• Describe any conclusions or implications . What might these results mean and what do they reveal about the body of research that exists on this particular topic?

Lab Reports and Articles

Psychology papers such as lab reports and APA format articles also often require an abstract. In these cases as well, the abstract should include all of the major elements of your paper, including an introduction, hypothesis, methods, results, and discussion.

Remember, although the abstract should be placed at the beginning of your paper (right after the title page), you will write the abstract last after you have completed a final draft of your paper.

To ensure that all of your APA formatting is correct, consider consulting a copy of the  Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association .

Keywords in an APA Abstract

After the paragraph containing the main elements of your abstract, you can also include keywords related to your paper. Such keywords are used when indexing your paper in databases and can help researchers and students locate your paper when searching for information about those topics.

Because keywords help people find your paper, it is essential to choose the right ones. The APA suggests including between three and five keywords.

You can identify keywords by thinking about what your paper is about. For example, if your paper focuses on how social media use is related to depression in teenagers, you might include the keywords: social media, mood, depression, adolescents, social networking sites 

A Word From Verywell

The abstract may be very brief, but it is so important that the official APA style manual identifies it as the most important paragraph in your entire paper. Careful attention to detail can ensure that your abstract does a good job representing the contents of your paper. If possible, take your paper to your school's writing lab for assistance.

Nagda S. How to write a scientific abstract. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(3):382–383. doi:10.1007/s13191-013-0299-x

Kumar A. Writing an abstract: Revealing the essence with eloquence .  J Indian Soc Periodontol . 2022;26(1):1-2. doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_634_21

American Psychological Association. APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards: Reporting Standards for Studies With an Experimental Manipulation .

American Psychological Association. APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards: Quantitative Meta-Analysis Article Reporting Standards .

Tullu MS. Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key .  Saudi J Anaesth . 2019;13(Suppl 1):S12-S17. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_685_18

American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association; 2019.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Office of Undergraduate Research

• Office of Undergraduate Research FAQ's
• URSA Engage
• Resources for Students
• Resources for Faculty
• Engaging in Research
• Presenting Your Research
• Earn Money by Participating in Research Studies
• Transcript Notation
• Student Publications

How to Write an Abstract

How to write an abstract for a conference, what is an abstract and why is it important, an abstract is a brief summary of your research or creative project, usually about a paragraph long (250-350 words), and is written when you are ready to present your research or included in a thesis or research publication..

For additional support in writing your abstract, you can contact the Office of URSA at [email protected]  or schedule a time to meet with a Writing and Research Consultant at the OSU Writing Center 

Main Components of an Abstract: 

The opening sentences should summarize your topic and describe what researchers already know, with reference to the literature. 

A brief discussion that clearly states the purpose of your research or creative project. This should give general background information on your work and allow people from different fields to understand what you are talking about. Use verbs like investigate, analyze, test, etc. to describe how you began your work. 

In this section you will be discussing the ways in which your research was performed and the type of tools or methodological techniques you used to conduct your research. 

This is where you describe the main findings of your research study and what you have learned. Try to include only the most important findings of your research that will allow the reader to understand your conclusions. If you have not completed the project, talk about your anticipated results and what you expect the outcomes of the study to be. 

Significance

This is the final section of your abstract where you summarize the work performed. This is where you also discuss the relevance of your work and how it advances your field and the scientific field in general.

• Your word count for a conference may be limited, so make your abstract as clear and concise as possible.
• Organize it by using good transition words found on the lef so the information flows well.
• Have your abstract proofread and receive feedback from your supervisor, advisor, peers, writing center, or other professors from different disciplines. 
• Double-check on the guidelines for your abstract and adhere to any formatting or word count requirements.
• Do not include bibliographic references or footnotes. 
• Avoid the overuse of technical terms or jargon. 

Feeling stuck? Visit the OSU ScholarsArchive for more abstract examples related to your field

Contact Info

618 Kerr Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331

541-737-5105

• - Google Chrome

Intended for healthcare professionals

• Access provided by Google Indexer
• My email alerts
• BMA member login
• Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution

Search form

• Advanced search
• Search responses
• Search blogs
• How to write an...

How to write an abstract that will be accepted

• Related content
• Peer review
• Mary Higgins , fellow in maternal fetal medicine 1 ,
• Maeve Eogan , consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist 2 ,
• Keelin O’Donoghue , consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, and senior lecturer 3 ,
• Noirin Russell , consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist 3
• 1 Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 2 Rotunda Hospital Dublin, Ireland
• 3 Cork University Maternity Hospital, Ireland
• mairenihuigin{at}gmail.com

Researchers do not always appreciate the importance of producing a good abstract or understand the best way of writing one. Mary Higgins and colleagues share some of the lessons they have learnt as both researchers and reviewers of abstracts

Effective abstracts reflect the time, work, and importance of the scientific research performed in the course of a study. A last minute approach and poor writing may not reflect the good quality of a study.

Between the four of us we have written over 150 published papers, as well as having reviewed numerous abstracts for national and international meetings. Nevertheless, we have all had abstracts rejected, and this experience has emphasised a number of teaching points that could help maximise the impact of abstracts and success on the world, or other, stage.

An abstract is the first glimpse an audience has of a study, and it is the ticket to having research accepted for presentation to a wider audience. For a study to receive the respect it deserves, the abstract should be as well written as possible. In practice, this means taking time to write the abstract, keeping it simple, reading the submission guidelines, checking the text, and showing the abstract to colleagues.

It is important to take the necessary time to write the abstract. Several months or years have been spent on this groundbreaking research, so take the time to show this. Five minutes before the call for abstracts closes is not the time to start putting it together.

Keep it simple, and think about the message that needs to be communicated. Some abstracts churn out lots of unrelated results and then have a conclusion that does not relate to the results, and this is just confusing. Plan what points need to be made, and then think about them a little more.

Read the submission guidelines and keep to the instructions provided in the call for abstracts. Don’t submit an unstructured abstract if the guidance has asked for a structured one. Comply with the word or letter count, and do not go over this.

An abstract comprises five parts of equal importance: the title, introduction and aims, methods, results, and conclusion. Allow enough time to write each part well.

The title should go straight to the point of the study. Make the study sound interesting so that it catches people’s attention. The introduction should include a brief background to the research and describe its aims. For every aim presented there needs to be a corresponding result in the results section. There is no need to go into detail in terms of the background to the study, as those who are reviewing the abstract will have some knowledge of the subject. The methods section can be kept simple—it is acceptable to write “retrospective case-control study” or “randomised controlled trial.”

The results section should be concrete and related to the aims. It is distracting and irritating to read results that have no apparent relation to the professed aims of the study. If something is important, highlight it or put it in italics to make it stand out. Include the number of participants, and ensure recognition is given if 10 000 charts have been reviewed. Equally, a percentage without a baseline number is not meaningful.

In the conclusion, state succinctly what can be drawn from the results, but don’t oversell this. Words like “possibly” and “may” can be useful in this part of the abstract but show that some thought has been put into what the results may mean. This is what divides the good from the not so good. Many people are capable of doing research, but the logical formation of a hypothesis and the argument of its proof are what make a real researcher.

Once you have written the abstract, check the spelling and grammar. Poor spelling or grammar can give the impression that the research is also poor. Show the abstract to the supervisor or principal investigator of the study, as this person’s name will go on the abstract as well. Then show the abstract to someone who knows nothing about the particular area of research but who knows something about the subject. Someone detached from the study might point out the one thing that needs to be said but that has been forgotten.

Then let it go; abstracts are not life and death scenarios. Sometimes an abstract will not be accepted no matter how wonderful it is. Perhaps there is a theme to the meeting, into which the research does not fit. Reviewers may also be looking for particular things. For one conference, we limited the number of case reports so that only about 10% were accepted. It may be that your research is in a popular or topical area and not all abstracts in that area can be chosen. On occasions, politics play a part, and individual researchers have little control over that.

Finally, remember that sometimes even the best reviewer may not appreciate the subtleties of your research and another audience may be more appreciative.

Competing interests: We have read and understood the BMJ Group policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation
• How to Write an Abstract | Steps & Examples

How to Write an Abstract | Steps & Examples

Published on 1 March 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 10 October 2022 by Eoghan Ryan.

An abstract is a short summary of a longer work (such as a dissertation or research paper ). The abstract concisely reports the aims and outcomes of your research, so that readers know exactly what your paper is about.

Although the structure may vary slightly depending on your discipline, your abstract should describe the purpose of your work, the methods you’ve used, and the conclusions you’ve drawn.

One common way to structure your abstract is to use the IMRaD structure. This stands for:

• Introduction

Abstracts are usually around 100–300 words, but there’s often a strict word limit, so make sure to check the relevant requirements.

In a dissertation or thesis , include the abstract on a separate page, after the title page and acknowledgements but before the table of contents .

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

Table of contents

Abstract example, when to write an abstract, step 1: introduction, step 2: methods, step 3: results, step 4: discussion, tips for writing an abstract, frequently asked questions about abstracts.

Hover over the different parts of the abstract to see how it is constructed.

This paper examines the role of silent movies as a mode of shared experience in the UK during the early twentieth century. At this time, high immigration rates resulted in a significant percentage of non-English-speaking citizens. These immigrants faced numerous economic and social obstacles, including exclusion from public entertainment and modes of discourse (newspapers, theater, radio).

Incorporating evidence from reviews, personal correspondence, and diaries, this study demonstrates that silent films were an affordable and inclusive source of entertainment. It argues for the accessible economic and representational nature of early cinema. These concerns are particularly evident in the low price of admission and in the democratic nature of the actors’ exaggerated gestures, which allowed the plots and action to be easily grasped by a diverse audience despite language barriers.

Keywords: silent movies, immigration, public discourse, entertainment, early cinema, language barriers.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

You will almost always have to include an abstract when:

• Completing a thesis or dissertation
• Submitting a research paper to an academic journal
• Writing a book proposal
• Applying for research grants

It’s easiest to write your abstract last, because it’s a summary of the work you’ve already done. Your abstract should:

• Be a self-contained text, not an excerpt from your paper
• Be fully understandable on its own
• Reflect the structure of your larger work

Start by clearly defining the purpose of your research. What practical or theoretical problem does the research respond to, or what research question did you aim to answer?

You can include some brief context on the social or academic relevance of your topic, but don’t go into detailed background information. If your abstract uses specialised terms that would be unfamiliar to the average academic reader or that have various different meanings, give a concise definition.

After identifying the problem, state the objective of your research. Use verbs like “investigate,” “test,” “analyse,” or “evaluate” to describe exactly what you set out to do.

This part of the abstract can be written in the present or past simple tense  but should never refer to the future, as the research is already complete.

• This study will investigate the relationship between coffee consumption and productivity.
• This study investigates the relationship between coffee consumption and productivity.

Next, indicate the research methods that you used to answer your question. This part should be a straightforward description of what you did in one or two sentences. It is usually written in the past simple tense, as it refers to completed actions.

• Structured interviews will be conducted with 25 participants.
• Structured interviews were conducted with 25 participants.

Don’t evaluate validity or obstacles here — the goal is not to give an account of the methodology’s strengths and weaknesses, but to give the reader a quick insight into the overall approach and procedures you used.

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Correct my document today

Next, summarise the main research results . This part of the abstract can be in the present or past simple tense.

• Our analysis has shown a strong correlation between coffee consumption and productivity.
• Our analysis shows a strong correlation between coffee consumption and productivity.
• Our analysis showed a strong correlation between coffee consumption and productivity.

Depending on how long and complex your research is, you may not be able to include all results here. Try to highlight only the most important findings that will allow the reader to understand your conclusions.

Finally, you should discuss the main conclusions of your research : what is your answer to the problem or question? The reader should finish with a clear understanding of the central point that your research has proved or argued. Conclusions are usually written in the present simple tense.

• We concluded that coffee consumption increases productivity.
• We conclude that coffee consumption increases productivity.

If there are important limitations to your research (for example, related to your sample size or methods), you should mention them briefly in the abstract. This allows the reader to accurately assess the credibility and generalisability of your research.

If your aim was to solve a practical problem, your discussion might include recommendations for implementation. If relevant, you can briefly make suggestions for further research.

If your paper will be published, you might have to add a list of keywords at the end of the abstract. These keywords should reference the most important elements of the research to help potential readers find your paper during their own literature searches.

Be aware that some publication manuals, such as APA Style , have specific formatting requirements for these keywords.

It can be a real challenge to condense your whole work into just a couple of hundred words, but the abstract will be the first (and sometimes only) part that people read, so it’s important to get it right. These strategies can help you get started.

Read other abstracts

The best way to learn the conventions of writing an abstract in your discipline is to read other people’s. You probably already read lots of journal article abstracts while conducting your literature review —try using them as a framework for structure and style.

You can also find lots of dissertation abstract examples in thesis and dissertation databases .

Reverse outline

Not all abstracts will contain precisely the same elements. For longer works, you can write your abstract through a process of reverse outlining.

For each chapter or section, list keywords and draft one to two sentences that summarise the central point or argument. This will give you a framework of your abstract’s structure. Next, revise the sentences to make connections and show how the argument develops.

Write clearly and concisely

A good abstract is short but impactful, so make sure every word counts. Each sentence should clearly communicate one main point.

To keep your abstract or summary short and clear:

• Avoid passive sentences: Passive constructions are often unnecessarily long. You can easily make them shorter and clearer by using the active voice.
• Avoid long sentences: Substitute longer expressions for concise expressions or single words (e.g., “In order to” for “To”).
• Avoid obscure jargon: The abstract should be understandable to readers who are not familiar with your topic.
• Avoid repetition and filler words: Replace nouns with pronouns when possible and eliminate unnecessary words.
• Avoid detailed descriptions: An abstract is not expected to provide detailed definitions, background information, or discussions of other scholars’ work. Instead, include this information in the body of your thesis or paper.

If you’re struggling to edit down to the required length, you can get help from expert editors with Scribbr’s professional proofreading services .

Check your formatting

If you are writing a thesis or dissertation or submitting to a journal, there are often specific formatting requirements for the abstract—make sure to check the guidelines and format your work correctly. For APA research papers you can follow the APA abstract format .

Checklist: Abstract

The word count is within the required length, or a maximum of one page.

The abstract appears after the title page and acknowledgements and before the table of contents .

I have clearly stated my research problem and objectives.

I have briefly described my methodology .

I have summarized the most important results .

I have stated my main conclusions .

I have mentioned any important limitations and recommendations.

The abstract can be understood by someone without prior knowledge of the topic.

You've written a great abstract! Use the other checklists to continue improving your thesis or dissertation.

An abstract is a concise summary of an academic text (such as a journal article or dissertation ). It serves two main purposes:

• To help potential readers determine the relevance of your paper for their own research.
• To communicate your key findings to those who don’t have time to read the whole paper.

Abstracts are often indexed along with keywords on academic databases, so they make your work more easily findable. Since the abstract is the first thing any reader sees, it’s important that it clearly and accurately summarises the contents of your paper.

An abstract for a thesis or dissertation is usually around 150–300 words. There’s often a strict word limit, so make sure to check your university’s requirements.

The abstract is the very last thing you write. You should only write it after your research is complete, so that you can accurately summarize the entirety of your thesis or paper.

Avoid citing sources in your abstract . There are two reasons for this:

• The abstract should focus on your original research, not on the work of others.
• The abstract should be self-contained and fully understandable without reference to other sources.

There are some circumstances where you might need to mention other sources in an abstract: for example, if your research responds directly to another study or focuses on the work of a single theorist. In general, though, don’t include citations unless absolutely necessary.

The abstract appears on its own page, after the title page and acknowledgements but before the table of contents .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, October 10). How to Write an Abstract | Steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 20 March 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/abstract/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a thesis or dissertation introduction, thesis & dissertation acknowledgements | tips & examples, dissertation title page.

Academic & Employability Skills

Subscribe to academic & employability skills.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 397 other subscribers.

Email Address

Writing an abstract - a six point checklist (with samples)

Posted in: abstract , dissertations

The abstract is a vital part of any research paper. It is the shop front for your work, and the first stop for your reader. It should provide a clear and succinct summary of your study, and encourage your readers to read more. An effective abstract, therefore should answer the following questions:

• Why did you do this study or project?
• What did you do and how?
• What did you find?
• What do your findings mean?

So here's our run down of the key elements of a well-written abstract.

• Size - A succinct and well written abstract should be between approximately 100- 250 words.
• Background - An effective abstract usually includes some scene-setting information which might include what is already known about the subject, related to the paper in question (a few short sentences).
• Purpose  - The abstract should also set out the purpose of your research, in other words, what is not known about the subject and hence what the study intended to examine (or what the paper seeks to present).
• Methods - The methods section should contain enough information to enable the reader to understand what was done, and how. It should include brief details of the research design, sample size, duration of study, and so on.
• Results - The results section is the most important part of the abstract. This is because readers who skim an abstract do so to learn about the findings of the study. The results section should therefore contain as much detail about the findings as the journal word count permits.
• Conclusion - This section should contain the most important take-home message of the study, expressed in a few precisely worded sentences. Usually, the finding highlighted here relates to the primary outcomes of the study. However, other important or unexpected findings should also be mentioned. It is also customary, but not essential, to express an opinion about the theoretical or practical implications of the findings, or the importance of their findings for the field. Thus, the conclusions may contain three elements:
• The primary take-home message
• Any additional findings of importance
• Implications for future studies 

Example Abstract 2: Engineering Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone.

Abstract from: Dalstra, M., Huiskes, R. and Van Erning, L., 1995. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. Journal of biomechanical engineering, 117(3), pp.272-278.

And finally...  A word on abstract types and styles

Abstract types can differ according to subject discipline. You need to determine therefore which type of abstract you should include with your paper. Here are two of the most common types with examples.

Informative Abstract

The majority of abstracts are informative. While they still do not critique or evaluate a work, they do more than describe it. A good informative abstract acts as a surrogate for the work itself. That is, the researcher presents and explains all the main arguments and the important results and evidence in the paper. An informative abstract includes the information that can be found in a descriptive abstract [purpose, methods, scope] but it also includes the results and conclusions of the research and the recommendations of the author. The length varies according to discipline, but an informative abstract is usually no more than 300 words in length.

Descriptive Abstract A descriptive abstract indicates the type of information found in the work. It makes no judgements about the work, nor does it provide results or conclusions of the research. It does incorporate key words found in the text and may include the purpose, methods, and scope of the research. Essentially, the descriptive abstract only describes the work being summarised. Some researchers consider it an outline of the work, rather than a summary. Descriptive abstracts are usually very short, 100 words or less.

(Adapted from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136027/ )

Share this:

• Click to print (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Click here to cancel reply.

• Email * (we won't publish this)

Write a response

Navigating the dissertation process: my tips for final years

Imagine for a moment... After months of hard work and research on a topic you're passionate about, the time has finally come to click the 'Submit' button on your dissertation. You've just completed your longest project to date as part...

8 ways to beat procrastination

Whether you’re writing an assignment or revising for exams, getting started can be hard. Fortunately, there’s lots you can do to turn procrastination into action.

My takeaways on how to write a scientific report

If you’re in your dissertation writing stage or your course includes writing a lot of scientific reports, but you don’t quite know where and how to start, the Skills Centre can help you get started. I recently attended their ‘How...

• How to write an abstract

Adobe Acrobat

How to write an abstract.

Learn how to write research abstracts and format them correctly.

Explore Acrobat

JUMP TO SECTION

Abstracts give your reader a preview

3 tips for writing great abstracts

How to write an abstract in 4 simple steps

Maximize the professionalism of your research paper

3 FAQs about abstracts

What is an abstract?

• An abstract serves as a summary of your research paper or thesis, giving your reader insight into what the paper is going to be about.
• It has a simple goal: Tell the reader whether or not the paper will be useful for them.
• Learning to write one well is an important step to getting your reader hooked on your project.

Abstracts give your reader a preview.

Whether you’re studying the humanities, social sciences, or any other field, an abstract introduces your audience to your research paper. Often a research paper or journal article is written for a specialized audience that’s educated about the topic. The abstract needs to be explicit about what the paper contains, so a reader can know if it’s what they’re looking for.

3 tips for writing great abstracts.

While an abstract is placed at the beginning of your paper to summarize everything that follows, you should only write it after your paper is complete.

1. To start an abstract, first read through your completed paper.

2. Identify the key elements a reader needs to understand before committing to reading the full paper.

3. Think of a compelling hook to grab the reader at the beginning of your abstract.

And if you’re ready to go, here are the steps to creating a clear, concise, and cogent abstract.

How to write an abstract in 4 simple steps.

Abstracts can be broken up into several parts, which is surprising considering that they’re relatively short compared to the rest of what you’re writing. Make sure to hit all the important points so people will be more likely to read your full paper. Your word limit depends on where your abstract will be published, but as a general rule, it should usually run 250 to 500 words. Check with your publication, professor, or advisor for clear length guidelines, and bear in mind that you may only have a few short sentences to explain each of the sections below.

1. Describe the background, question, and goals.

These three pieces of information form the backbone of your research project. In four to five sentences, give the background for your research, state the question you’re trying to answer with that research, and then define the goal of your study. Here’s an example:

Everyone has had the experience of getting caught in the rain. But why does it rain? My intuition is that by analyzing barometer data, I will be able to determine the likelihood that it will rain on any given day.

This simple example makes it easy to see the critical details: There’s background (rain), a question (why?), and a goal (figuring out the likelihood of rain).

2. Define your methodology.

Methods come next — this is where you detail in brief the research methods. In the example above, the person writing the paper is going to use a barometer to try and predict the likelihood of rain. Go into additional detail about exactly how you intend to use your methodology to collect data.

3. Summarize your findings.

Write out your main findings in your abstract in one to two sentences. This part is simple: Summarize what you found with your research project. In the rain example, you simply say if there was any correlation between the occurrence of rain and the barometric pressure.

4. Explain the significance.

This section is where you tell your audience why your research matters . This is the moneymaker, where you illustrate why your findings are important and why people should read your full paper. An example of significance might be:

We can measure the likelihood of rainfall based on barometric pressure.

Now you have all the tools you need to write an abstract for your research paper. Read on to learn how to make your hard work look as professional as possible.

Get work done. Anywhere.

Adobe Acrobat Pro

View product details

Maximize the professionalism of your research paper.

Clean and professional-looking documents lend credibility to your abstract and research paper and help you put your best foot forward.

Preserve formatting.

In addition to a well-written abstract, a well-formatted document encourages people to read it. Make sure to submit a document that prints cleanly and works on any platform so your research isn’t warped or distorted by poor formatting. Remove any gaps, get rid of extra spaces, and extract unwanted pages to keep your document length reasonable.

Add charts and imagery.

Sometimes you need to include charts, imagery, and other visual elements in a research paper, and you want that information to look good. With tools like Acrobat Pro, you can add whatever elements you need and be sure they’ll show up for the reader exactly how you want. Plus, you can add a page to a PDF quickly, so it’s no trouble to add anything new right where you want it.

Compress and share.

Finally, use the Compress PDF tool to shrink the file size of image-heavy papers so you can more easily download and share them. Your professors or collaborators can also add comments and annotations , without accidentally affecting the layout of your document.

3 FAQs about abstracts.

What’s the purpose of an abstract, what is something to avoid in an abstract, what’s a literature review and how does it differ from an abstract, keep exploring.

https://main--dc--adobecom.hlx.page/dc-shared/fragments/seo-articles/seo-caas-collection

https://main--dc--adobecom.hlx.page/dc-shared/fragments/seo-articles/acrobat-color-blade

How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries? pp 179–184 Cite as

How to Write an Abstract?

• Samiran Nundy 4 ,
• Atul Kakar 5 &
• Zulfiqar A. Bhutta 6  
• Open Access
• First Online: 24 October 2021

54k Accesses

5 Altmetric

An abstract is a crisp, short, powerful, and self-contained summary of a research manuscript used to help the reader swiftly determine the paper’s purpose. Although the abstract is the first paragraph of the manuscript it should be written last when all the other sections have been addressed.

Research is formalized curiosity. It is poking and prying with a purpose. — Zora Neale Hurston, American Author, Anthropologist and Filmmaker (1891–1960)

Download chapter PDF

1 What is an Abstract?

An abstract is usually a standalone document that informs the reader about the details of the manuscript to follow. It is like a trailer to a movie, if the trailer is good, it stimulates the audience to watch the movie. The abstract should be written from scratch and not ‘cut –and-pasted’ [ 1 ].

2 What is the History of the Abstract?

An abstract, in the form of a single paragraph, was first published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal in 1960 with the idea that the readers may not have enough time to go through the whole paper, and the first abstract with a defined structure was published in 1991 [ 2 ]. The idea sold and now most original articles and reviews are required to have a structured abstract. The abstract attracts the reader to read the full manuscript [ 3 ].

3 What are the Qualities of a Good Abstract?

The quality of information in an abstract can be summarized by four ‘C’s. It should be:

C: Condensed

C: Critical

4 What are the Types of Abstract?

Before writing the abstract, you need to check with the journal website about which type of abstract it requires, with its length and style in the ‘Instructions to Authors’ section.

The abstract types can be divided into:

Descriptive: Usually written for psychology, social science, and humanities papers. It is about 50–100 words long. No conclusions can be drawn from this abstract as it describes the major points in the paper.

Informative: The majority of abstracts for science-related manuscripts are informative and are surrogates for the research done. They are single paragraphs that provide the reader an overview of the research paper and are about 100–150 words in length. Conclusions can be drawn from the abstracts and in the recommendations written in the last line.

Critical: This type of abstract is lengthy and about 400–500 words. In this, the authors’ own research is discussed for reliability, judgement, and validation. A comparison is also made with similar studies done earlier.

Highlighting: This is rarely used in scientific writing. The style of the abstract is to attract more readers. It is not a balanced or complete overview of the article with which it is published.

Structured: A structured abstract contains information under subheadings like background, aims, material and methods, results, conclusion, and recommendations (Fig. 15.1 ). Most leading journals now carry these.

Example of a structured abstract (with permission editor CMRP)

5 What is the Purpose of an Abstract?

An abstract is written to educate the reader about the study that follows and provide an overview of the science behind it. If written well it also attracts more readers to the article. It also helps the article getting indexed. The fate of a paper both before and after publication often depends upon its abstract. Most readers decide if a paper is worth reading on the basis of the abstract. Additionally, the selection of papers in systematic reviews is often dependent upon the abstract.

6 What are the Steps of Writing an Abstract?

An abstract should be written last after all the other sections of an article have been addressed. A poor abstract may turn off the reader and they may cause indexing errors as well. The abstract should state the purpose of the study, the methodology used, and summarize the results and important conclusions. It is usually written in the IMRAD format and is called a structured abstract [ 4 , 5 ].

I: The introduction in the opening line should state the problem you are addressing.

M: Methodology—what method was chosen to finish the experiment?

R: Results—state the important findings of your study.

D: Discussion—discuss why your study is important.

Mention the following information:

Important results with the statistical information ( p values, confidence intervals, standard/mean deviation).

Arrange all information in a chronological order.

Do not repeat any information.

The last line should state the recommendations from your study.

The abstract should be written in the past tense.

7 What are the Things to Be Avoided While Writing an Abstract?

Cut and paste information from the main text

Hold back important information

Use abbreviations

Tables or Figures

Generalized statements

Arguments about the study

8 What are Key Words?

These are important words that are repeated throughout the manuscript and which help in the indexing of a paper. Depending upon the journal 3–10 key words may be required which are indexed with the help of MESH (Medical Subject Heading).

9 How is an Abstract Written for a Conference Different from a Journal Paper?

The basic concept for writing abstracts is the same. However, in a conference abstract occasionally a table or figure is allowed. A word limit is important in both of them. Many of the abstracts which are presented in conferences are never published in fact one study found that only 27% of the abstracts presented in conferences were published in the next five years [ 6 ].

Table 15.1 gives a template for writing an abstract.

10 What are the Important Recommendations of the International Committees of Medical Journal of Editors?

The recommendations are [ 7 ]:

An abstract is required for original articles, metanalysis, and systematic reviews.

A structured abstract is preferred.

The abstract should mention the purpose of the scientific study, how the procedure was carried out, the analysis used, and principal conclusion.

Clinical trials should be reported according to the CONSORT guidelines.

The trials should also mention the funding and the trial number.

The abstract should be accurate as many readers have access only to the abstract.

11 Conclusions

An Abstract should be written last after all the other sections of the manuscript have been completed and with due care and attention to the details.

It should be structured and written in the IMRAD format.

For many readers, the abstract attracts them to go through the complete content of the article.

The abstract is usually followed by key words that help to index the paper.

Andrade C. How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation? Indian J Psychiatry. 2011;53:172–5.

Article   Google Scholar  

Squires BP. Structured abstracts of original research and review articles. CMAJ. 1990;143:619–22.

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Pierson DJ. How to write an abstract that will be accepted for presentation at a national meeting. Respir Care. 2004 Oct;49:1206–12.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Tenenbein M. The abstract and the academic clinician. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995;11:40–2.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: abstract and keywords. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;18:e100159.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Grover S, Dalton N. Abstract to publication rate: do all the papers presented in conferences see the light of being a full publication? Indian J Psychiatry. 2020;62:73–9.

Preparing a manuscript for submission to a medical journal. Available on http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation/preparing-for-submission.html . Accessed 10 May 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Samiran Nundy

Department of Internal Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Institute for Global Health and Development, The Aga Khan University, South Central Asia, East Africa and United Kingdom, Karachi, Pakistan

Zulfiqar A. Bhutta

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Nundy, S., Kakar, A., Bhutta, Z.A. (2022). How to Write an Abstract?. In: How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries?. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5248-6_15

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5248-6_15

Published : 24 October 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-16-5247-9

Online ISBN : 978-981-16-5248-6

eBook Packages : Medicine Medicine (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Search Menu
• Animal Research
• Cardiovascular/Pulmonary
• Health Services
• Health Policy
• Health Promotion
• History of Physical Therapy
• Implementation Science
• Integumentary
• Musculoskeletal
• Orthopedics
• Pain Management
• Pelvic Health
• Pharmacology
• Population Health
• Professional Issues
• Psychosocial
• Advance Articles
• COVID-19 Collection
• Featured Collections
• Special Issues
• PTJ Peer Review Academies
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Why Publish With PTJ?
• Open Access
• Call for Papers
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Promote your Article
• About Physical Therapy
• Editorial Board
• Advertising & Corporate Services
• Permissions
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Research is a team sport: ralph nitkin on the research relationship between the foundation and the national institutes of health, gratitude in action: physical therapist researchers extend heartfelt thanks to foundation and donors.

• David Rouen III, From Superior Medical Equipment, Chronicles Personal Physical Therapy Journey and Company Evolution
• Foundation Grants Available in 2024
• Make a Donation on Behalf of Your Alumni
• Share Your News With the Foundation
• < Previous

News From the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research, March 2024

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

News From the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research, March 2024, Physical Therapy , Volume 104, Issue 3, March 2024, pzae016, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae016

• Permissions Icon Permissions

How can early career funding and mentoring help emerging investigators? Why do the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research and the National Institutes of Health share application and review standards? How can Foundation awards set up an investigator for future funding? To answer those questions and more, we sat down with Ralph Nitkin, PhD, the deputy director of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Read more for valuable insights.

Discover the world of physical therapy research with us! In our latest video, we delve into the significance of Foundation support and the crucial role it plays in advancing physical therapy research. Immerse yourself in heartfelt testimonials that showcase the life-changing effects of donor contributions.

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to Your Librarian
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1538-6724
• Copyright © 2024 American Physical Therapy Association
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT WITH COGNIVUE CLARITY: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND ENHANCED NORMATIVE RANGES IN A DIVERSE POPULATION

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• For correspondence: [email protected]
• Info/History
• Preview PDF

Background: Detecting cognitive impairment in clinical practice is challenging as most instruments do not perform well in diverse samples of older adults. These same instruments are often used for eligibility into clinical trials making it difficult to recruit minoritized adults into Alzheimers disease (AD) studies. Cognivue Clarity is an FDA-cleared computerized cognitive screening platform using adaptive psychophysics to detect cognitive impairment. Objective: Test the ability of Cognivue Clarity to detect cognitive impairment in a diverse community sample compared with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Methods: This study enrolled 452 participants across 6 US study sites and completed both Cognivue Clarity device and RBANS. Psychometric properties and exploratory factor analysis of Cognivue Clarity were explored and comparisons against RBANS across different age, sex, education, and ethnoracial groups were conducted. Results: Participants had a mean age of 47.9+16.1 years (range: 18-85), 63.6% were female, 45.9% had <12 years of education, 31.2% were African American and 9.2% were Hispanic. Cognivue Clarity had strong internal consistency, test-retest and minimal practice effects. A 4-factor structure (Memory, Attention, Visuomotor, and Discrimination) had excellent goodness of fit. Normalizing age effects improved performance. Race and education effects were similar to those seen with RBANS. Cognivue Clarity had strong correlation with RBANS. Conclusions: Our study supports the use of Cognivue Clarity as an easy-to-use, brief, and valid cognitive assessment that can be used for identifying individuals with likely cognitive impairment in the clinical setting and those who could be candidates for AD research studies.

Competing Interest Statement

Dr. Galvin is Chief Scientific Officer for Cognivue, Inc and receives consulting fees. Dr. Chang received consulting fees from Cognivue, Inc. Paul Estes, Heather Harris, and Dr. Fung are employees of Cognivue, Inc. The authors take full responsibility for the data,; and have the right to publish all data

Funding Statement

Cognivue, Inc

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The FOCUS study was deemed exempt by the Advarra Institutional Review Board (Pro00064617).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Data Availability

The dataset for this project is available to all interested parties. Please contact JEG at [email protected].

View the discussion thread.

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Citation Manager Formats

• EndNote (tagged)
• EndNote 8 (xml)
• RefWorks Tagged
• Ref Manager
• Tweet Widget
• Facebook Like
• Google Plus One

Subject Area

• Addiction Medicine (312)
• Allergy and Immunology (614)
• Anesthesia (157)
• Cardiovascular Medicine (2224)
• Dentistry and Oral Medicine (275)
• Dermatology (199)
• Emergency Medicine (366)
• Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (788)
• Epidemiology (11506)
• Forensic Medicine (10)
• Gastroenterology (673)
• Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3510)
• Geriatric Medicine (336)
• Health Economics (609)
• Health Informatics (2259)
• Health Policy (905)
• Health Systems and Quality Improvement (855)
• Hematology (332)
• HIV/AIDS (738)
• Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13092)
• Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (747)
• Medical Education (355)
• Medical Ethics (97)
• Nephrology (383)
• Neurology (3294)
• Nursing (189)
• Nutrition (502)
• Obstetrics and Gynecology (642)
• Occupational and Environmental Health (643)
• Oncology (1732)
• Ophthalmology (516)
• Orthopedics (205)
• Otolaryngology (282)
• Pain Medicine (219)
• Palliative Medicine (65)
• Pathology (430)
• Pediatrics (993)
• Pharmacology and Therapeutics (415)
• Primary Care Research (394)
• Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3024)
• Public and Global Health (5941)
• Radiology and Imaging (1210)
• Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (704)
• Respiratory Medicine (802)
• Rheumatology (362)
• Sexual and Reproductive Health (343)
• Sports Medicine (307)
• Surgery (381)
• Toxicology (50)
• Transplantation (169)
• Urology (140)

• Reference Manager
• Simple TEXT file

People also looked at

Original research article, the role, impact, and responsibilities of health experts on social media. a focus group study with future healthcare workers.

• Department of Nordic and Media Studies, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

People are increasingly turning to social media platforms to acquire information and seek advice on health matters. Consequently, a growing number of qualified healthcare professionals are using social media as channels for public health communication. On platforms such as YouTube and Instagram, health workers can reach a wide and interested audience while applying powerful tools for presentation and interaction. However, such platforms also represent certain challenges and dilemmas when doctors and psychologists become health influencers. Who do they represent? What style of communication is expected? And what responsibilities do they have toward their followers? The present study contributes to the field of investigation by employing qualitative methods. It is based on three focus group interviews conducted with students enrolled in health-related study programmes at Norwegian universities. The paper asks: How do future healthcare workers perceive the social media practices of popular healthcare experts regarding the advantages and dilemmas associated with such practices?

Introduction

People are increasingly turning to social media platforms to acquire information and seek advice on health matters ( Chen and Wang, 2021 ). Consequently, a growing number of qualified healthcare professionals are using social media as channels for public health communication ( Campbell et al., 2016 ). Throughout the course of the pandemic, the use of platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter as arenas for authoritative health information, as well as various forms of health-related misinformation, increased substantially ( Suarez-Lledo and Alvarez-Galvez, 2021 ). Today, many healthcare professionals have attained popularity as media personalities, using their platforms to share details of their private lives with their followers in parallel to providing reliable and evidence-based health guidance. While some derive their livelihood solely from activities associated with their social media presence, others function as “health influencers” 1 alongside their primary roles as hospital physicians, psychologists, or public health nurses. Given that these actors represent novel and popular avenues for health communication, it becomes imperative to address urgent questions regarding the effectiveness and social implications of their media practices. Do they improve public health? Are they the new first-line service? Or do they make their followers oversensitive to normal challenges, or even sully the reputation of health sciences? The present study suggests that social media platforms provide unique opportunities for healthcare professionals to disseminate authoritative health advice to a broad audience. However, the study also indicates that being a public health advisor on social media does not appear particularly attractive to future healthcare workers.

There is increasing scholarly interest in the use of social media platforms by qualified healthcare professionals and health organizations ( Martini et al., 2018 ; Basch et al., 2021 ; Chen and Wang, 2021 ). Much of the existing research in this domain employs quantitative methodologies, which uncover broad patterns in the evolution of mediated health communication ( Chen and Wang, 2021 ). The present study contributes to the field employing qualitative methods. It is based on three focus group interviews conducted with students enrolled in health-related study programmes at Norwegian universities. The paper asks: How do future healthcare workers perceive the social media practices of popular healthcare experts regarding the advantages and dilemmas associated with such practices? 2 The objective of the study is to add depth and nuances to a field of research dominated by quantitative studies, allowing the voices of future healthcare workers to be heard. Today's students of health sciences will assumably have a considerable impact on the future development of public health communication. They are also qualified critics of the practices in question. Therefore, their voices are of special interest, yet largely absent from the existing body of research. The results of the study will be useful to students and researchers in the media and health sciences, as well as for practitioners and policy makers operating within this domain.

The article is structured into four main sections. First, it provides a narrative review of previous research conducted in this field of investigation. Second, the methodological and theoretical frameworks employed in the study are explained. In the third section, the interview data is analyzed. Engagement, trust , and social roles are key concepts in the analysis. In the fourth and final section, the findings are summarized, discussed, and concluded.

Previous research on social media and health communication

Social media have long been regarded as a promising arena for science communication and dissemination of knowledge. According to Davies and Hara ( 2017 , p. 564), digital and social media have the potentials to “open up science, enable dialogue, and create a digital public sphere of engagement and debate.” These media affordances also apply to health communication. Research has revealed that social media represent opportunities to increase self-efficacy, treatment adherence, and health literacy, when used actively by health professionals to spread health information and advice ( Suarez-Lledo and Alvarez-Galvez, 2021 ). However, these channels also work as arenas for health-related misinformation , understood as “a health-related claim that is based on anecdotal evidence, false or misleading owing to the lack of existing scientific knowledge” ( Suarez-Lledo and Alvarez-Galvez, 2021 , p. 2). That is one of the reasons why Gabarron et al. ( 2020 , p. 127) state that healthcare professionals and public health institutions need to have a greater presence on social media: “They have the potential for interacting with individuals, delivering trustworthy information, correcting misinformation, and providing the correct responses to personal and public concerns.”

A literature review of 158 relevant studies concluded that “using SM [social media] could be a key strategy in addressing some of the challenges and limitations often faced by HCPs [health care providers] in traditional health communication through faster and cheaper dissemination, more accessibility, better interaction, and increased patient empowerment” ( Farsi, 2021 , p. 6).

As a channel for qualified health information and advice, social media represent a new arena, and guidelines from public health authorities are rare ( Gabarron et al., 2020 ; Farsi et al., 2022 ). However, research indicates that certain strategies work better than others in terms of evoking engagement among internet users. The use of video ( Kite et al., 2016 ; Martini et al., 2018 ), personal stories, humor, and two-way communication ( Steffens et al., 2020 ; Basch et al., 2021 ), are all elements that have been shown to evoke followers' attention and engagement. Although social media's opportunities for dialogue and interaction are regarded by some commentators as the “gold mine” for health workers who want to reach young internet users ( Yonker et al., 2015 , p. 8), many health experts use these media merely as a one-way channel for the dissemination of information ( Campbell et al., 2016 ). Such a one-way approach to a typical two-way social arena may be motivated by several factors, such as the time demanded for staying connected and the risk of privacy breach (cf. Farsi, 2021 ).

While social media offer unique opportunities for health communication in the digital public, they also represent several challenges, risks, and dilemmas. One challenge is to find the right balance between pedagogical simplification and scientific quality. In all forms of public communication of scientific content, the issue of understandability is key (cf. Bauer, 2009 ). And social media offer unique affordances regarding educationally tailored, visual and multimodal presentations of health-related content ( Moreno and D'Angelo, 2019 ). On the other hand, too strong simplification and generalization may blur important nuances and even lead to a banalization of the subject topic.

Another challenge lies in establishing an online identity that effectively combines the role of a trusted and personal advisor with that of a professional health authority. One approach is to adopt the style employed by popular lifestyle or fashion influencers. This style typically involves the sharing of personal details ( Torjesen, 2021 ), potentially fostering both emotional engagement and a sense of confidentiality and trust with followers. However, such a stylistic choice can clash with the expectation of objectivity and discretion associated with a professional healthcare provider ( Ferrell and Campos-Castillo, 2022 ). The existing literature does not provide a definitive answer on the most effective means of building trust on social media (ibid.). Some commentators suggest that many people, particularly young people, tend to place greater trust in their friends and other approachable individuals than in experts ( Yonker et al., 2015 ; Jenkins et al., 2020 ). Conversely, others argue that trust can be established through the inclusion of credible sources and an emphasis on the reliability of the information conveyed ( Fontaine et al., 2019 ).

The above-mentioned challenges of evoking engagement and building trust are related to a potential conflict of norms. This conflict comes to surface when institutionalized conventions regulating the behavior of professional health workers meet the open and sharing culture of social networks ( Munson et al., 2013 ; Ferrell and Campos-Castillo, 2022 ; Atef et al., 2023 ). They are also related to the fact that the health-related information and advice offered on social media platforms are most often aimed at a wide audience ( Farsi et al., 2022 ). When targeting a wide media audience, it can be challenging to find topics and a style of discourse that fits all, as well as to construct a sender identity and a social relation that evokes engagement and trust in all parts of the audience. Farsi ( 2021 , p. 7) write: “Messages tailored to certain population segments are more effective than generic messages, as tailored messages address the specific needs of their recipients.”

Thus, research in the field has revealed that the transition of health information from leaflets, school visits, and magazine columns to YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok implies both new opportunities and new challenges. What is lacking in the literature are qualitative investigations on how specific segments of users experience and value the work done by health experts on social media. The present study is a response to this lacuna in our shared knowledge on health and the media.

Methodological and theoretical framework

The study is based on three focus group interviews, each group consisting of five to six students enrolled in health-related study programmes at Norwegian universities. The study programmes included are medicine, psychology, and public health nursing (a 1-year further education programme for nurses). Employing a qualitative design, the study aims to uncover the experiences, attitudes, and reflections expressed by members of this specific segment of the media audience. The findings are not representative of a large and diverse population. Nevertheless, the study provides insights and nuanced perspectives on how a particular group of recipients responds to a new genre of health communication and how these responses manifest verbally. The article supports its findings by presenting extracts from transcribed interviews, documenting, and illustrating the results. This form of explorative, qualitative research contributes to future surveys that aim to identify patterns and trends within larger populations.

The interview guide was developed based on previous research in the relevant field (see the previous section) and relevant concepts from two disciplines: science communication and social semiotics. In the literature on science communication, three key factors for such communication to be successful are identified: understandability, emotional engagement , and trust ( Bauer, 2009 ). All these aspects of communication are reflected in the interview guide. In the theoretical field of social semiotics, the focus is on the process of meaning-making in social settings, including the interpersonal aspect of communication. According to Van Leeuwen (2022) , the shaping and negotiation of identities and social roles are fundamental processes in all instances of human communication. These processes are particularly relevant for this study, as they contribute to establishing the social status of the communicating individuals and the trustworthiness attributed to the exchanged messages.

Van Leeuwen (2022) distinguishes four types of identity: social identity , which positions individuals within specific social groups; individual identity , which signifies unique qualities and characteristics of a person; role identity , which indicates the various social or professional roles a person may have in different situations; and lifestyle identity , which connects a person to particular values and interests based on leisure activities and consumption patterns. These categories of identity are applicable to both the sender and the receiver of mediated messages. In the present study, they are useful in analyzing and discussing the results from the focus group interviews.

Recruitment and implementation

Students enrolled in health-related study programmes were specifically chosen for their possession of three key characteristics: (a) being relevant recipients of the media content, (b) possessing the qualifications to critically analyse the content, and (c) having the potential to become recruits for the type of media practice being examined. The interviews were coordinated and carried out by staff members of Medlytic , a Norwegian company specializing in supporting health-related research. They undertook this task based on the detailed instructions and interview guide provided by the author of this article. 3

In the process of recruiting participants to the focus groups, Medlytic staff used social media announcements. They also reached out to personal networks within the student population. All participants were enrolled in study programmes at various Norwegian universities. The author of this article decided the number of participants in each focus group, and what study programmes the participants in each group should be recruited from: study programmes in medicine, psychology, and health nursing, respectively. As a token of gratitude for their time and participation, the informants received a small gift card. To conduct the interviews, Medlytic staff used the video conferencing software Zoom, allowing digital interaction. Each of the three interviews had a duration of approximately one to one and a half hours, the participants sitting in different locations in Norway. All interview sessions were recorded on video and subsequently anonymised and transcribed. The author of this article, not being present during the Zoom sessions, received the anonymised transcriptions once they were completed. Staff members from Medlytic have not taken any part in the analysis of the interviews or in the writing process.

The analysis was carried out in three stages. During the initial stage, all interview transcripts were uploaded to Nvivo software and coded according to a predefined codebook that was developed based on the interview guide and the theoretical framework. In the second stage, both the codebook and the coding were iteratively adjusted by multiple readings of the transcripts. Lastly, in the third stage, the analysis was thematically organized and written with the objective of providing a valid and comprehensive response to the research question. At this stage, the focus was on detecting ideas and perceptions recurring across the three groups as well as variations in the interview data.

Methodological reflections

Focus group interviews encompass both strengths and weaknesses as a research methodology (see, e.g., Powell and Single, 1996 ). One advantage lies in the group dynamics, which facilitate the emergence of diverse ideas and foster discussion, including the introduction of contrasting viewpoints. Furthermore, the inclusion of a larger number of participants allows for a comprehensive data collection in a relatively short time frame. Powell and Single ( 1996 , p. 504) write: “The focus group is an ideal means of generating hypotheses, of investigating unexplored areas of human experience and of clarifying ambiguous ones.” However, there are also drawbacks to consider. Participants may self-censor due to concerns about potential social stigma within the group, hindering the full expression of their thoughts and opinions. Additionally, there is a risk that more extroverted or dominant participants might overshadow the contributions of quieter participants. To address these concerns, it is crucial that the moderator extracts relevant information from all participants while safeguarding the integrity of the individual informant. In the present study, a professional moderator was appointed to lead all three interviews, based on the instructions and interview guide provided by the author of this article. While this delegation of tasks may have strengthened the flow of information in the interview sessions, it also represents limitations regarding the follow-up questions that were raised, and the amount of time allocated to each theme. An additional limitation of the study is the gender imbalance among informants, 16 out of 17 participants being women. This imbalance is a consequence of the recruitment process, while also reflecting the existing gender disparity in health-related study programmes in Norway. 4 Although it remains uncertain whether a more balanced group of informants would have yielded significantly different results, this gender distribution should be recognized. Regarding the reliability of the results, it should be recognized that another researcher might have emphasized and presented the findings in the interview data differently, not least since the analysis in this case was carried out by a single researcher. This hermeneutic aspect of qualitative research makes complete replicability unattainable. It highlights the need for transparency regarding the implementation of the research and awareness regarding its limitations.

The study adheres to the prevailing academic standards of research ethics and has obtained approval from the Norwegian Center for Research Data (NSD).

The focus groups

The three focus groups consisted of individuals referred to by their chosen nicknames, as listed below (see Tables 1 – 3 ).

Table 1 . Group 1—Students studying medicine.

Table 2 . Group 2—Students studying psychology.

Table 3 . Group 3—Students studying public health nursing (the public health nursing programme is a 1-year continuing education programme for nurses).

During the recruitment stage, candidates received information on the general theme of the interview. They were instructed to prepare by familiarizing themselves with a selection of relevant social media accounts, which are run by a hospital doctor, a psychologist, and a public health nurse, respectively. 5 Many of the participants already knew one or more of these accounts, as well as similar accounts run by other health experts. Consequently, the responses given during the interviews should not be interpreted solely as reactions to the three specific accounts mentioned, but rather as reflections on the broader phenomenon of health experts providing information and advice on social media.

The analysis reveals that the study participants generally perceive the health experts' activities on social media as a positive and beneficial practice. They appreciate their role in increasing visibility and normalizing discussions surrounding health issues, as well as raising awareness about health matters. However, they also highlighted certain areas of uncertainty and risk connected to these forms of media practice. None of the participants expressed aspirations to engage in this kind of practice themselves (see Table 4 ) .

Table 4 . Examples of key questions and responses in the interview data.

A central finding of the study is that the participants perceive the relational aspect as a crucial factor in the activities of healthcare professionals on social media. According to the literature on science communication ( Bauer, 2009 ; Davies and Horst, 2016 ), building social connections provides opportunities for emotional engagement and facilitates effective dissemination of academic content. The informants also acknowledge and appreciate the efforts of experts to simplify complex topics. However, in their view, both endeavors come with associated costs. Therefore, one key conclusion drawn from the interviews is that the success and effectiveness of such media activities by professional health workers hinge on their ability to strike a delicate balance between two basic, yet potentially conflicting, aims: being comprehensible while maintaining scientific accuracy; and fostering social connections while upholding professional standards.

In the following analysis of the interview data, key findings, and selected citations underpinning them, are organized in three sections, each presenting the informants' view on the following topics: the dissemination of content to a wide audience; the stimulation of the followers' engagement and trust, and the likelihood that they themselves will take on a role as health influencers.

Examples of key questions and responses are found in Table 4 below, followed by a more detailed presentation of the results.

Dissemination of content to a wide audience

The informants are generally of the opinion that qualified health influencers have a considerable ability to reach a large audience with health advice that is understandable and useful to many. Nina (medicine student) believes that the most popular health influencers have “cracked a code” that the public health authorities have not yet managed. She said 6 :

The public authorities are probably thinking about how they can achieve something similar, reach out to people. They have maybe not cracked that code themselves, then.

However, some of the informants highlight potential problems that may arise from targeting a broad audience. When a health expert delves deeply into a narrow and specialized topic, many of their followers can feel excluded. On the other hand, if the expert alternates between very disparate types of information or advice, it can confuse followers regarding whether they belong to the intended target group or not. Among the informants, there are various opinions about the types of topics that work well or not so well on social media accounts with a broad and heterogeneous audience. Some say that such accounts should focus on promoting good health and general wellbeing, while refraining from providing detailed descriptions and advice related to severe health conditions. Others say that it can be a support for people who suffer from serious conditions to hear about others who go through the same.

Ingvild (psychology student) said:

I think anything that promotes good health that is presented on Instagram or elsewhere is a good thing. Everything that is preventive, that explains how our body and mind work, is good. What I think there should be less of, is all the talk about serious illnesses and symptoms. (..) What do we gain from talking a lot about anxiety, trauma and depression, or people dying from cancer? I don't say that it's all wrong (..) It is not good to be protected from everything evil. (..) But I think promoting good health is more important.

Regarding the challenges related to the pedagogical shaping of professional knowledge to fit a broad audience consisting of non-experts with limited time and interest, the informants unanimously concur on the necessity of simplification. They acknowledge that many health experts on social media are very good at this. However, they also caution against the potential drawbacks of oversimplification. In certain instances, some participants said, it can obscure a reality that is considerably more complex. The concerns expressed by some of the psychology students were particularly focused on the potential pitfalls of providing generalized advice on mental challenges that can be experienced in very diverse ways by different individuals. Additionally, it was emphasized that while straightforward guidance for psychological self-help may prove effective for some individuals, it may not be equally beneficial for everyone, particularly when individuals are solely responsible for implementing the advice in their own lives. And if the advice does not work, it was argued, it can potentially intensify feelings of defeat and despair. Ronja (psychology student) said:

Some may read these simple-looking advice and think, ok, I should use some more time on myself, but they experience that it can be difficult to implement without any further guidance. And it may encourage the idea that this does not help me, I will not be any better.

Many informants highlighted one significant positive impact of health experts engaging with social media: the ability to bring attention to and normalize conditions that are normally not talked about. That is a key reason for the general opinion among the informants that health experts on social media generally contribute to improving public health. Thelma (medicine student) said:

Just a few years ago, no one would ever talk loud about going to a psychologist. And it was unheard of that you should seek professional help if you were struggling with difficult thoughts or those kinds of things. Now, that has become quite normal. Several of my own friends can say, oh, I have to go because I have an appointment with my psychologist. I think that is because some psychologists have started to be more visible on social media, offering their knowledge as well as their opinions. I think that is a really good thing.

On the other hand, several of the informants were concerned about the risk of misinterpretations and self-diagnosis as a result of oversimplification and increased visibility, especially in the context of mental health. They emphasized the challenge of capturing all nuances associated with different mental conditions in a highly simplistic manner, highlighting the likelihood that individuals may too hastily identify specific symptoms within themselves. The need for individualized treatment of mental conditions was emphasized, given the diverse range of causes and symptoms they can encompass. Connie (psychology student) said:

I saw a video reel on Instagram about mental diagnoses. It did not convey the appropriate information about the decline of normal function and levels of symptomatic pressure, which are actually very key criteria for making a diagnosis. It is completely impossible for...even for us, who are students of psychology and have worked in this field for years, we cannot do it right.

Furthermore, informants highlighted the risk of misinterpreting provided information due to the absence of adequate opportunities for follow-up questions or personalized guidance. It was also expressed a concern that something presented with the aim of describing a normal human condition, a condition that most people will recognize, is perceived as a symptom of sickness. Ingvild (psychology student) said:

Everyone will recognise some signs of depression or some signs of anxiety. That does not mean that you are depressed or that you are a person who suffers from anxiety. But many people might think they are, because they lack a deeper understanding of these conditions.

Stimulation of engagement and trust

To communicate scientific knowledge effectively to a wide audience, it is essential to evoke a certain level of emotional engagement (cf. Bauer, 2009 ). The participants recognized the potential for social connection inherent in the role of popular health influencers. Individual experts, showing their faces and revealing personal experience and advice, tend to appear more relatable and approachable compared to an organization or a public health institution. According to Munson et al. (2013) , being personal and approachable is a central issue when experts use social media for public health communication. This aspect is crucial in cultivating emotional engagement among followers and, consequently, building a broad and attentive audience (ibid.). Several informants expressed similar ideas. Susanne (public health nursing student) said:

To build a following, those who follow need to feel that they get to know the person behind the account. That is the whole point of being an influencer. That those following you feel that they know you. So, if they behave in a very distanced manner, I doubt that they will create much engagement.

Thus, a key aspect of building a relation with an audience is the construction of a sender identity. A sender identity is based in part on the personality of the communicating individual, but it is also the result of a certain style , i.e., the choices made concerning verbal message, visual appearance, and physical surroundings ( Van Leeuwen, 2022 ). In the case of health influencers, several informants emphasized that health experts on social media need to find the right balance between representing themselves—building a personal brand—and representing a field of scientific knowledge as well as a profession. Several informants, having observed a number of health experts on various social media platforms, talked about substantial variations concerning their choices of style. Some have a very informal and personal style in their posts, sharing their personal experiences and opinions about current controversies, while others have a more objective and formal style. The informants reported that some health influencers reveal an intention to build social relationships, while others focus more exclusively on scientific matters. Which strategy is more effective is a question without a clear answer in the three groups of participants. Marie (public health nursing student) said:

When it comes to sharing their own experiences, for example, talking about what worked well for themselves.. I guess that will be useful for some of their followers. It depends on their age group, and many things.(..) For those struggling with certain problems, it may help to see that certain simple measures worked well for this psychologist, for example.

Karianne (public health nursing student) said:

For my part, I prefer to have it more distanced. When health issues are concerned, a distanced form makes the health influencer more trustworthy, in my eyes. But I do see the potentials that lie in the opposite, a style that involves the sharing of their own experiences and life situations. That may contribute to normalising symptoms that one may experience, or normalising a certain life condition that one feels totally alone in.

Some informants noted that the difficult balance between representing a field of science on the one hand and building their own personal brand on the other, becomes particularly visible when health influencers promote their own books instead of guiding followers to consult other sources or other health experts. Kine (psychology student) said:

There may be various motifs behind the media activity. Some may write that …ok, if this strikes you, you can read more about it in my book. Instead of saying, ok, if this strikes you, you should see a psychologist, here is the number to so and so…

On the other hand, some informants expressed that they understand that money is a natural—and sometimes necessary—element in a long-term engagement as a health influencer. Ingvild (psychology student) said:

All the health influencers I have observed… they all seem to possess a genuine desire to help. They do not appear to be bad people who only think about money. But gradually, if you see that... here I can make some money if I write a book. It is a natural thing to think. No one hates money. Or some of them may wish to become famous. And you may question how moral such a wish is. But anyway, if they do the right things, they still do a good job in terms of preventive care and health promotion.

The choice between building an approachable and personal identity as a health influencer or rather constructing a professional, distanced expert-identity, became a core issue in the conversations with the informants. It concerns questions of engagement and trust, and it also involves questions of ethical standards and dilemmas. The existence of a personalized social relationship is key to having an impact on the attitudes and actions of other people. But in a situation where it is impossible to follow up such a relationship by offering individual advice and guidance; is it still ethically acceptable to build such a relationship? On this issue, the reflections of the informants follow various trajectories. Beate (medicine student) said:

Some of the influencers I have looked at have a strong personal style, and I believe they become important figures in the lives of many young people. And that is a good thing, because they offer a lot of good advice. But then, when a young person feels that…this is meant for me, and yet, they cannot get in touch with the sender, that may lead to problems. It means that health influencers should be very explicit, saying that…I am not your psychologist. If you are struggling, you should consult someone else.

The issues of identity and style lead to the question of who the health experts on social media actually are representing. Do they work as a new first-line service, implying that they have a role in the public health care system? Or do they only represent themselves? It should be noted that some health influencers work their day job in various public health institutions, while others earn their living from personal enterprises. The informants, all familiar with the public health care system in Norway, have different views on this question. Marie (public health nursing student) said:

They are not employed by anyone; they are independent actors. And what they do is mainly to offer information, not health care. So, I would not call them a new first-line service.

Other informants are more open to the idea that qualified health workers on social media can function as a new first-line service. Beate (medicine student) said:

When you mentioned first-line service, I thought that...since everyone is on social media nowadays, this may be the first place that you meet issues related to mental health. Or to corona. This may be the first step. And then you might become more curious, you read more and bring it to your GP, who may then send you to a specialist. I think this might be the first line, yes. But in a grey-zone, somehow.

Nina (medicine student) agreed with Beate, and said:

A first-line service, yes. You check with people you trust first. Then you may consult the public health system in the next step.

Reflections: will you become a health influencer?

While the informants generally conveyed positive attitudes toward the efforts of health experts on social media, none of the 17 informants expressed an ambition to assume a similar publicly exposed role when explicitly asked. Several reasons for this reluctance were mentioned, including the fear of making mistakes or tarnishing the reputation of their own profession; the fear of facing public criticism, and the sense of being responsible for the health of other people without the ability to provide continuous support. Ingvild (psychology student) said:

If you have 100 000 followers, it is probably impossible to answer all the messages you receive. How would you choose between them? I would have felt really bad not being able to follow up all those who contacted me. Being a popular health influencer, you have no contract about following up everyone contacting you. But I think you have some sort of moral responsibility. I would not feel ok about it. That is one of the reasons why I never would wish to be a person with many followers, someone known to many.

Nina (medicine student) said:

My field of interest is neuroscience, which is research on the human brain, and I want to continue working in that field. And I think it would be very useful to inform people about that topic. But it is really hard to explain it in a proper manner, without making it banal and incorrect. (..) I think that is a reason why I would not choose to become a public figure. I am not sure whether it is even possible to disseminate it in a proper way.

Another reason for reluctance was particularly related to how some of the informants viewed the profession of psychologists. One informant, Ronja, studying psychology, felt that practicing both as a clinical psychologist and as an influencer on mental issues would be difficult to combine. She said:

Being an influencer, you are supposed to put focus on yourself and who you are—which is somehow the opposite of what a psychologist is supposed to do when working with therapy. (..) In a way, being a psychologist is different from being a psychology influencer.

Although they were skeptical about assuming the role of a publicly exposed health influencer themselves, several informants acknowledged that they were inspired by such media actors. They reported that health experts on social media had made them more aware of the importance of making their own knowledge accessible to others.

Fredrikke (public health nursing student) said:

I think she [a public health nurse on social media] is really accessible. And we may feel a bit of a pressure because we are not equally accessible. We may not have to open a Snapchat-account, but we need to think of new solutions to become more accessible. Maybe for both good and bad.

Discussion and conclusion

In the introduction of this paper, I asked: How do future healthcare workers perceive the media practices of popular health influencers regarding the advantages and dilemmas associated with such practices? Using the three focus group interviews with 17 students enrolled in health-related study programmes at Norwegian universities as an indicator, we can now ask more specifically: How did the participants view today's health experts on social media regarding the three key factors for effective science communication mentioned by Bauer (2009) : understandability, engagement, and trust?

Overall, the participants recognized the strong potentials of such media activity concerning all three factors. But they also identified certain challenges and dilemmas. While simplification was acknowledged as necessary in popular dissemination, several participants—particularly those studying psychology—noted that the sharing of generalized advice can be problematic, since individual followers may experience health issues in very different ways. It is difficult to offer advice adapted to individual needs when you have 100,000 followers on Instagram, it was mentioned.

Concerning engagement and trust, these factors were closely connected to the kind of sender-identity that is being constructed by the individual health expert. Van Leeuwen (2022) emphasizes that different types of identity can be expressed through different styles , which encompass choices related to clothing, language, visual symbols etc. A specific area of research examines how identities are formed within the realm of social media. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok provide opportunities for individuals to creatively curate their identities through the arrangement of words, voice, camera angels, colors, and other semiotic resources (see, e.g., Rettberg, 2014 ). Applying the four kinds of identity suggested by Van Leeuwen (2022) —individual identity; social identity; role identity, and lifestyle identity—we can conclude that the informants valued the significance of the different kinds of identity differently in this context. Some participants valued individual identity and lifestyle identity strongest, emphasizing that a key success factor on social media is to build a personal brand by applying a personal style and sharing personal details and ideas. Others valued more strongly a style that reflects the social role and responsibilities of being a public health expert, representing institutionalized knowledge and traditions. It was said that a more objective and distanced style makes health experts appear more trustworthy, even on social media. These different views touch upon critical comments that have surfaced in the trade press regarding potential ambiguities in terms of roles and identities, that may occur when popular health influencers use their professional titles on their private social media channels. In a Norwegian journal for nurses, concerns are expressed that it can seem hard to distinguish between their role as entrepreneurs, promoting their own enterprises, and their role as healthcare professionals ( Fjelldal, 2019 ).

In the literature on health experts using social media for health communication, many commentators are concerned about the risk of sensitive information being exposed in the sections with followers' comments (e.g., Munson et al., 2013 ; Yonker et al., 2015 ; Farsi, 2021 ). When asked explicitly about ethical concerns, none of the participants in the study mentioned this issue. What many were more concerned about, was the responsibility related to giving generalized health advice without being able to follow up each receiver individually. This finding may indicate that the next generation of health care givers (contrary to media scholars?) assume that the sharing of personal information is a normal thing to do for many users of social media, and that those who share such information, know what they are doing. This view corresponds to opinions expressed by health experts active on social media ( Engebretsen, 2024 ).

The results of the study are relevant for several groups. Media scholars are informed on the reception of a new media practice; health professionals active on social media can see and review detailed feedback on activities similar to their own, and health authorities are offered input to evaluate and guide a new communication practice that involves qualified health personal. The results also have implications for educators. If qualified health advice on social media can be seen as a new first-line service, an idea that several participants agreed to, such dissemination activity should be reflected in relevant health-related study programmes. Parallel to the growing attention to patient-doctor communication in medical education (see, e.g., Ong et al., 1995 ), a similar attention to expert-audience communication online would be a useful outcome of the growing body of research in this novel field of practice. To support future curricula changes in this direction, more research is needed to understand and evaluate the social and professional role of qualified health influencers on social media. What rhetorical strategies are the most effective in terms of understandability and engagement? What professional and ethical norms and values are most suitable to guide such media activities? And how can non-expert audience members distinguish between trustworthy and less trustworthy health information on popular social media platforms? The questions are multiple, and they call for multiple approaches in terms of research design and methodology.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the article is based on anonymized transcriptions of focus group interviews. The interviewees were not asked to accept re-use of the interview data beyond the described study so the data cannot be used by others. Queries relating to the research may be directed to the author.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

ME: Writing – original draft.

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was funded by a grant from The Norwegian Media Authorities (grant no. 21/2073) and by the author's home institution, University of Agder.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Norwegian Media Authorities for funding the study from which this article is derived. And a big thanks to the 17 participants that openly shared their thoughts and opinions on the topic of interest in this article and thus made it a feasible project.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

1. ^ I use the concept of “influencers” according to the wide definition presented on the web site of Vixen Awards, an organization that annually awards prizes to Norwegian influencers: “An influencer is a person who has an influence on others through content that is created and shared in their own channels and on social media.” (My translation from Norwegian). Downloaded August 28th, 2023, from https://www.vixen.no/ .

2. ^ The study is part of a project funded by The Norwegian Media Authorities. Other parts of the project include a multimodal discourse analysis of one selected case ( Engebretsen, 2023 ), and an interview-based study of three awarded health influencers ( Engebretsen, 2024 ).

3. ^ See the interview guide in Appendix 1 . The same guide was used in all three interviews.

4. ^ According to statistics from the Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills, 81 per cent of the students starting health-related studies in 2022 were women. https://www.samordnaopptak.no/info/om/sokertall/sokertall-2022/sluttstatistikk-uhg-2022.pdf .

5. ^ The informants were asked to study the following social media accounts for preparation: https://www.instagram.com/psyktdeg/ , https://www.youtube.com/c/DrWasimZahid , and https://www.instagram.com/helsesista/ . See Engebretsen (2023) for a multimodal case study of the Instagram account PsyktDeg .

6. ^ All citations are translated from Norwegian to English by author. When a sequence of words from the transcript is omitted in the citation, it is marked with (..).

Atef, N., Fleerackers, A., and Alperin, J. (2023). “Influencers” or “doctors”? Physicians' presentation of self in Youtube and Facebook videos. Int. J. Commun. 17, 2665–2688. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/2rbt7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Basch, C. H., Fera, J., Pierce, I., and Basch, C. E. (2021). Promoting mask use on TikTok: descriptive, cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 7:e26392. doi: 10.2196/26392

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W. (2009). The evolution of public understanding of science: discourse and comparative evidence. Sci. Technol. Soc. 14, 221–240. doi: 10.1177/097172180901400202

Campbell, L., Evans, Y., Pumper, M., and Moreno, M. (2016). Social media use by physicians: a qualitative study of the new frontier of medicine. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 16:91. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0327-y

Chen, J., and Wang, Y. (2021). Social media use for health purposes: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:e17917. doi: 10.2196/17917

Davies, S., and Hara, N. (2017). Public science in a wired world: how online media are shaping science communication. Sci. Commun. 39, 563–568. doi: 10.1177/1075547017736892

Davies, S., and Horst, M. (2016). Science Communication. Culture, Identity and Citizenship . London: Palgrave. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-50366-4

Engebretsen, M. (2023). Communicating health advice on social media: a multimodal case study. Mediekultur 39, 164–184. doi: 10.7146/mk.v39i74.134085

Engebretsen, M. (2024). På YouTube og Instagram i Folkehelsas Tjeneste. En Studie av Tre Helsearbeidere på Sosiale Medier. [On YouTube and Instagram in the Service of Public Health. A Study of Three Health Workers on Social Media]. Norsk Medietidsskrift .

Google Scholar

Farsi, D. (2021). Social media and health care, part I: literature review of social media use by health care providers. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:e23205. doi: 10.2196/23205

Farsi, D., Martinez-Menchaca, H., Ahmed, M., and Farsi, N. (2022). Social media and health care, part ii: narrative review of social media use by patients. J. Med. Internet Res. 24:e30379. doi: 10.2196/preprints.30379

Ferrell, D., and Campos-Castillo, C. (2022). Factors affecting physicians' credibility on Twitter when sharing health information: online experimental study. JMIR Infodemiology 2:e34525. doi: 10.2196/34525

Fjelldal, S. (2019). Hvilken Rolle har Helsesista? [What role does Helsesista have?] Debate post in Sykepleien (Norwegian journal for nurses), 03.12.2019. Available online at: https://sykepleien.no/meninger/innspill/2019/11/hvilken-rolle-har-helsesista (accessed September 14, 2023).

Fontaine, G., Maheu-Cadotte, M., Lavallée, A., Mailhot, T., Rouleau, G., Bouix-Picasso, J., et al. (2019). Communicating science in the digital and social media ecosystem: scoping review and typology of strategies used by health scientists. JMIR Public Health Surveil. 5:e14447. doi: 10.2196/14447

Gabarron, E., Bradway, M., and Årsand, E. (2020). “Social media for adults,” in Diabetes Digital Health , eds D. Klonoff, D. Kerr, and S. Mulvaney (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 119–129. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817485-2.00009-2

Jenkins, E., Ilicic, J., Barklamb, A., and McCaffrey, T. (2020). Assessing the credibility and authenticity of social media content for applications in health communication: scoping review. J. Med. Int. Res . 22. doi: 10.2196/17296

Kite, J., Foley, B., Grunseit, A., and Freeman, B. (2016). Please like me: Facebook and public health communication. PLoS ONE 11:e0162765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162765

Martini, T., Czepielewski, L., Baldez, D., Gliddon, E., Kieling, C., Berk, L., et al. (2018). Mental health information online: what we have learned from social media metrics in BuzzFeed's Mental Health Week. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 40, 326–336. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0023

Moreno, M., and D'Angelo, J. (2019). Social media intervention design: applying an affordances framework. J. Med. Internet Res. 21:e11014. doi: 10.2196/preprints.11014

Munson, S., Cavusoglu, H., Frisch, L., and Fels, S. (2013). Sociotechnical challenges and progress in using social media for health. J. Med. Internet Res. 15:e2792. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2792

Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J., Hoos, A. M., and Lammes, F.B. (1995). Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 40, 903–918. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-M

Powell, R., and Single, H. M. (1996). Methodology matters: focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 8, 499–504. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499

Rettberg, J. W. (2014). Seeing Ourselves through Technology : How we use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to see and Shape Ourselves . London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137476661

Steffens, M., Dunn, A., Leask, J., and Wiley, K. (2020). Using social media for vaccination promotion: practices and challenges. Digi. Health 6. doi: 10.1177/2055207620970785

Suarez-Lledo, V., and Alvarez-Galvez, J. (2021). Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187

Torjesen, A. (2021). The genre repertoires of Norwegian beauty and lifestyle influencers on YouTube. Nordicom Rev. 42, 168–184. doi: 10.2478/nor-2021-0036

Van Leeuwen, T. (2022). Multimodality and Identity . London, NY: Routledge doi: 10.4324/9781003186625

Yonker, L., Zan, S., Scirica, C., Jethwani, K., and Kinane, T. (2015). “Friending” teens: systematic review of social media in adolescent and young adult health care. J. Med. Internet Res. 17:e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3692

Project: Health workers on social media

Project leader: Prof. Martin Engebretsen, University of Agder

Interview guide, focus groups

(Translated from Norwegian)

1. Age, gender and professional background (type of study) of the participants.

2. Did you know any of the three selected health influencers before you were asked to participate in the study?

- Do you know other, similar health professionals on SoMe?

- Have you yourself been an active follower of any of these actors on SoMe?

3. Are you yourselves affected by these types of media actors when it comes to your own understanding of your profession and social role?

- Do you, for example, either feel identification—or distance?

- Do you experience that they simplify the professional content too much (oversimplification)?

- Do you yourself become more aware of the importance of communicating professional knowledge in a way that is adapted to a target audience, or that is creative and innovative?

- Do you feel like taking a similar role yourself in the future, using digital media?

4. Do you believe that these actors reach their target audiences in terms of providing them with…

- a better understanding of their own health?

- a better relationship with themselves and their own body/mental health?

- greater trust in qualified health experts?

5. Do you believe that health communication in social media can motivate changes in lifestyle or mindset?

- Are there any differences between young and older followers in this regard?

6. Do you see any professional or ethical dilemmas associated with this type of practice?

- Is it a problem that the style and tone of social media and professional healthcare are inherently different (personal and intimate vs. professional and distant)?

- Is it a problem that sharing and interaction are expected on social media, while anonymity and discretion are expected in other forms of contact with healthcare?

7. How do you perceive the social role of this group of health communicators?

- Are they “private” knowledge disseminators, who stand outside the healthcare system, but are driven by a desire to contribute to better public health?

- Are they a kind of frontline service that helps people in need move further into the healthcare system?

- Are they primarily commercial actors, operating primarily on market terms?

- Are they a kind of “rock stars” attracted by the attention and reward system that social media can provide?

- Something completely different? Or something more mixed—difficult to generalize?

Instruction: Present the main, open question first—then specify in the next round if the proposed points have not been mentioned in the conversation.

Keywords: social media, health communication, trust, social roles, focus group interviews, students, health experts

Citation: Engebretsen M (2024) The role, impact, and responsibilities of health experts on social media. A focus group study with future healthcare workers. Front. Commun. 9:1296296. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1296296

Received: 18 September 2023; Accepted: 21 February 2024; Published: 12 March 2024.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2024 Engebretsen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Martin Engebretsen, martin.engebretsen@uia.no

This article is part of the Research Topic

Insights in Health Communication: 2022-2024

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Perspective
• Published: 06 March 2024

Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research

• Lisa Messeri   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-123X 1   na1 &
• M. J. Crockett   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-410X 2 , 3   na1  

Nature volume  627 ,  pages 49–58 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

18k Accesses

3 Citations

697 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Human behaviour
• Interdisciplinary studies
• Research management
• Social anthropology

Scientists are enthusiastically imagining ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) tools might improve research. Why are AI tools so attractive and what are the risks of implementing them across the research pipeline? Here we develop a taxonomy of scientists’ visions for AI, observing that their appeal comes from promises to improve productivity and objectivity by overcoming human shortcomings. But proposed AI solutions can also exploit our cognitive limitations, making us vulnerable to illusions of understanding in which we believe we understand more about the world than we actually do. Such illusions obscure the scientific community’s ability to see the formation of scientific monocultures, in which some types of methods, questions and viewpoints come to dominate alternative approaches, making science less innovative and more vulnerable to errors. The proliferation of AI tools in science risks introducing a phase of scientific enquiry in which we produce more but understand less. By analysing the appeal of these tools, we provide a framework for advancing discussions of responsible knowledge production in the age of AI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Crabtree, G. Self-driving laboratories coming of age. Joule 4 , 2538–2541 (2020).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Wang, H. et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620 , 47–60 (2023). This review explores how AI can be incorporated across the research pipeline, drawing from a wide range of scientific disciplines .

Article   CAS   PubMed   ADS   Google Scholar  

Dillion, D., Tandon, N., Gu, Y. & Gray, K. Can AI language models replace human participants? Trends Cogn. Sci. 27 , 597–600 (2023).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Grossmann, I. et al. AI and the transformation of social science research. Science 380 , 1108–1109 (2023). This forward-looking article proposes a variety of ways to incorporate generative AI into social-sciences research .

Gil, Y. Will AI write scientific papers in the future? AI Mag. 42 , 3–15 (2022).

Google Scholar  

Kitano, H. Nobel Turing Challenge: creating the engine for scientific discovery. npj Syst. Biol. Appl. 7 , 29 (2021).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Benjamin, R. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020). This book examines how social norms about race become embedded in technologies, even those that are focused on providing good societal outcomes .

Broussard, M. More Than a Glitch: Confronting Race, Gender, and Ability Bias in Tech (MIT Press, 2023).

Noble, S. U. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (New York Univ. Press, 2018).

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. & Shmitchell, S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? in Proc. 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 610–623 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021). One of the first comprehensive critiques of large language models, this article draws attention to a host of issues that ought to be considered before taking up such tools .

Crawford, K. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence (Yale Univ. Press, 2021).

Johnson, D. G. & Verdicchio, M. Reframing AI discourse. Minds Mach. 27 , 575–590 (2017).

Article   Google Scholar  

Atanasoski, N. & Vora, K. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures (Duke Univ. Press, 2019).

Mitchell, M. & Krakauer, D. C. The debate over understanding in AI’s large language models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120 , e2215907120 (2023).

Kidd, C. & Birhane, A. How AI can distort human beliefs. Science 380 , 1222–1223 (2023).

Birhane, A., Kasirzadeh, A., Leslie, D. & Wachter, S. Science in the age of large language models. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5 , 277–280 (2023).

Kapoor, S. & Narayanan, A. Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. Patterns 4 , 100804 (2023).

Hullman, J., Kapoor, S., Nanayakkara, P., Gelman, A. & Narayanan, A. The worst of both worlds: a comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and machine learning. In Proc. 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (eds Conitzer, V. et al.) 335–348 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2022).

Rudin, C. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1 , 206–215 (2019). This paper articulates the problems with attempting to explain AI systems that lack interpretability, and advocates for building interpretable models instead .

Crockett, M. J., Bai, X., Kapoor, S., Messeri, L. & Narayanan, A. The limitations of machine learning models for predicting scientific replicability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120 , e2307596120 (2023).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Lazar, S. & Nelson, A. AI safety on whose terms? Science 381 , 138 (2023).

Article   PubMed   ADS   Google Scholar  

Collingridge, D. The Social Control of Technology (St Martin’s Press, 1980).

Wagner, G., Lukyanenko, R. & Paré, G. Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews. J. Inf. Technol. 37 , 209–226 (2022).

Hutson, M. Artificial-intelligence tools aim to tame the coronavirus literature. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01733-7 (2020).

Haas, Q. et al. Utilizing artificial intelligence to manage COVID-19 scientific evidence torrent with Risklick AI: a critical tool for pharmacology and therapy development. Pharmacology 106 , 244–253 (2021).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Müller, H., Pachnanda, S., Pahl, F. & Rosenqvist, C. The application of artificial intelligence on different types of literature reviews – a comparative study. In 2022 International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence (ICAPAI) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAPAI55158.2022.9801564 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2022).

van Dinter, R., Tekinerdogan, B. & Catal, C. Automation of systematic literature reviews: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 136 , 106589 (2021).

Aydın, Ö. & Karaarslan, E. OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: digital twin in healthcare. In Emerging Computer Technologies 2 (ed. Aydın, Ö.) 22–31 (İzmir Akademi Dernegi, 2022).

AlQuraishi, M. AlphaFold at CASP13. Bioinformatics 35 , 4862–4865 (2019).

Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596 , 583–589 (2021).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   ADS   Google Scholar  

Lee, J. S., Kim, J. & Kim, P. M. Score-based generative modeling for de novo protein design. Nat. Computat. Sci. 3 , 382–392 (2023).

Gómez-Bombarelli, R. et al. Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a high-throughput virtual screening and experimental approach. Nat. Mater. 15 , 1120–1127 (2016).

Krenn, M. et al. On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 , 761–769 (2022).

Extance, A. How AI technology can tame the scientific literature. Nature 561 , 273–274 (2018).

Hastings, J. AI for Scientific Discovery (CRC Press, 2023). This book reviews current and future incorporation of AI into the scientific research pipeline .

Ahmed, A. et al. The future of academic publishing. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7 , 1021–1026 (2023).

Gray, K., Yam, K. C., Zhen’An, A. E., Wilbanks, D. & Waytz, A. The psychology of robots and artificial intelligence. In The Handbook of Social Psychology (eds Gilbert, D. et al.) (in the press).

Argyle, L. P. et al. Out of one, many: using language models to simulate human samples. Polit. Anal. 31 , 337–351 (2023).

Aher, G., Arriaga, R. I. & Kalai, A. T. Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies. In Proc. 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Krause, A. et al.) 337–371 (JMLR.org, 2023).

Binz, M. & Schulz, E. Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120 , e2218523120 (2023).

Ornstein, J. T., Blasingame, E. N. & Truscott, J. S. How to train your stochastic parrot: large language models for political texts. Github , https://joeornstein.github.io/publications/ornstein-blasingame-truscott.pdf (2023).

He, S. et al. Learning to predict the cosmological structure formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116 , 13825–13832 (2019).

Article   MathSciNet   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   ADS   Google Scholar  

Mahmood, F. et al. Deep adversarial training for multi-organ nuclei segmentation in histopathology images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39 , 3257–3267 (2020).

Teixeira, B. et al. Generating synthetic X-ray images of a person from the surface geometry. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 9059–9067 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2018).

Marouf, M. et al. Realistic in silico generation and augmentation of single-cell RNA-seq data using generative adversarial networks. Nat. Commun. 11 , 166 (2020).

Watts, D. J. A twenty-first century science. Nature 445 , 489 (2007).

boyd, d. & Crawford, K. Critical questions for big data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15 , 662–679 (2012). This article assesses the ethical and epistemic implications of scientific and societal moves towards big data and provides a parallel case study for thinking about the risks of artificial intelligence .

Jolly, E. & Chang, L. J. The Flatland fallacy: moving beyond low–dimensional thinking. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11 , 433–454 (2019).

Yarkoni, T. & Westfall, J. Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: lessons from machine learning. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12 , 1100–1122 (2017).

Radivojac, P. et al. A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat. Methods 10 , 221–227 (2013).

Bileschi, M. L. et al. Using deep learning to annotate the protein universe. Nat. Biotechnol. 40 , 932–937 (2022).

Barkas, N. et al. Joint analysis of heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq dataset collections. Nat. Methods 16 , 695–698 (2019).

Demszky, D. et al. Using large language models in psychology. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2 , 688–701 (2023).

Karjus, A. Machine-assisted mixed methods: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14379 (2023).

Davies, A. et al. Advancing mathematics by guiding human intuition with AI. Nature 600 , 70–74 (2021).

Peterson, J. C., Bourgin, D. D., Agrawal, M., Reichman, D. & Griffiths, T. L. Using large-scale experiments and machine learning to discover theories of human decision-making. Science 372 , 1209–1214 (2021).

Ilyas, A. et al. Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.02175 (2019)

Semel, B. M. Listening like a computer: attentional tensions and mechanized care in psychiatric digital phenotyping. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 47 , 266–290 (2022).

Gil, Y. Thoughtful artificial intelligence: forging a new partnership for data science and scientific discovery. Data Sci. 1 , 119–129 (2017).

Checco, A., Bracciale, L., Loreti, P., Pinfield, S. & Bianchi, G. AI-assisted peer review. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8 , 25 (2021).

Thelwall, M. Can the quality of published academic journal articles be assessed with machine learning? Quant. Sci. Stud. 3 , 208–226 (2022).

Dhar, P. Peer review of scholarly research gets an AI boost. IEEE Spectrum spectrum.ieee.org/peer-review-of-scholarly-research-gets-an-ai-boost (2020).

Heaven, D. AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind. Nature 563 , 609–610 (2018).

Conroy, G. How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing. Nature 622 , 234–236 (2023).

Nosek, B. A. et al. Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 73 , 719–748 (2022).

Altmejd, A. et al. Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments. PLoS ONE 14 , e0225826 (2019).

Yang, Y., Youyou, W. & Uzzi, B. Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 , 10762–10768 (2020).

Youyou, W., Yang, Y. & Uzzi, B. A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of psychology papers over the past two decades. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120 , e2208863120 (2023).

Rabb, N., Fernbach, P. M. & Sloman, S. A. Individual representation in a community of knowledge. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23 , 891–902 (2019). This comprehensive review paper documents the empirical evidence for distributed cognition in communities of knowledge and the resultant vulnerabilities to illusions of understanding .

Rozenblit, L. & Keil, F. The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cogn. Sci. 26 , 521–562 (2002). This paper provided an empirical demonstration of the illusion of explanatory depth, and inspired a programme of research in cognitive science on communities of knowledge .

Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, 1995).

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991).

Kitcher, P. The division of cognitive labor. J. Philos. 87 , 5–22 (1990).

Hardwig, J. Epistemic dependence. J. Philos. 82 , 335–349 (1985).

Keil, F. in Oxford Studies In Epistemology (eds Gendler, T. S. & Hawthorne, J.) 143–166 (Oxford Academic, 2005).

Weisberg, M. & Muldoon, R. Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor. Philos. Sci. 76 , 225–252 (2009).

Sloman, S. A. & Rabb, N. Your understanding is my understanding: evidence for a community of knowledge. Psychol. Sci. 27 , 1451–1460 (2016).

Wilson, R. A. & Keil, F. The shadows and shallows of explanation. Minds Mach. 8 , 137–159 (1998).

Keil, F. C., Stein, C., Webb, L., Billings, V. D. & Rozenblit, L. Discerning the division of cognitive labor: an emerging understanding of how knowledge is clustered in other minds. Cogn. Sci. 32 , 259–300 (2008).

Sperber, D. et al. Epistemic vigilance. Mind Lang. 25 , 359–393 (2010).

Wilkenfeld, D. A., Plunkett, D. & Lombrozo, T. Depth and deference: when and why we attribute understanding. Philos. Stud. 173 , 373–393 (2016).

Sparrow, B., Liu, J. & Wegner, D. M. Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333 , 776–778 (2011).

Fisher, M., Goddu, M. K. & Keil, F. C. Searching for explanations: how the internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144 , 674–687 (2015).

De Freitas, J., Agarwal, S., Schmitt, B. & Haslam, N. Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7 , 1845–1854 (2023).

Castelo, N., Bos, M. W. & Lehmann, D. R. Task-dependent algorithm aversion. J. Mark. Res. 56 , 809–825 (2019).

Cadario, R., Longoni, C. & Morewedge, C. K. Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5 , 1636–1642 (2021).

Oktar, K. & Lombrozo, T. Deciding to be authentic: intuition is favored over deliberation when authenticity matters. Cognition 223 , 105021 (2022).

Bigman, Y. E., Yam, K. C., Marciano, D., Reynolds, S. J. & Gray, K. Threat of racial and economic inequality increases preference for algorithm decision-making. Comput. Hum. Behav. 122 , 106859 (2021).

Claudy, M. C., Aquino, K. & Graso, M. Artificial intelligence can’t be charmed: the effects of impartiality on laypeople’s algorithmic preferences. Front. Psychol. 13 , 898027 (2022).

Snyder, C., Keppler, S. & Leider, S. Algorithm reliance under pressure: the effect of customer load on service workers. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4066823 (2022).

Bogert, E., Schecter, A. & Watson, R. T. Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult. Sci Rep. 11 , 8028 (2021).

Raviv, A., Bar‐Tal, D., Raviv, A. & Abin, R. Measuring epistemic authority: studies of politicians and professors. Eur. J. Personal. 7 , 119–138 (1993).

Cummings, L. The “trust” heuristic: arguments from authority in public health. Health Commun. 29 , 1043–1056 (2014).

Lee, M. K. Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data Soc. 5 , https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684 (2018).

Kissinger, H. A., Schmidt, E. & Huttenlocher, D. The Age of A.I. And Our Human Future (Little, Brown, 2021).

Lombrozo, T. Explanatory preferences shape learning and inference. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 , 748–759 (2016). This paper provides an overview of philosophical theories of explanatory virtues and reviews empirical evidence on the sorts of explanations people find satisfying .

Vrantsidis, T. H. & Lombrozo, T. Simplicity as a cue to probability: multiple roles for simplicity in evaluating explanations. Cogn. Sci. 46 , e13169 (2022).

Johnson, S. G. B., Johnston, A. M., Toig, A. E. & Keil, F. C. Explanatory scope informs causal strength inferences. In Proc. 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2453–2458 (Cognitive Science Society, 2014).

Khemlani, S. S., Sussman, A. B. & Oppenheimer, D. M. Harry Potter and the sorcerer’s scope: latent scope biases in explanatory reasoning. Mem. Cognit. 39 , 527–535 (2011).

Liquin, E. G. & Lombrozo, T. Motivated to learn: an account of explanatory satisfaction. Cogn. Psychol. 132 , 101453 (2022).

Hopkins, E. J., Weisberg, D. S. & Taylor, J. C. V. The seductive allure is a reductive allure: people prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information. Cognition 155 , 67–76 (2016).

Weisberg, D. S., Hopkins, E. J. & Taylor, J. C. V. People’s explanatory preferences for scientific phenomena. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 3 , 44 (2018).

Jerez-Fernandez, A., Angulo, A. N. & Oppenheimer, D. M. Show me the numbers: precision as a cue to others’ confidence. Psychol. Sci. 25 , 633–635 (2014).

Kim, J., Giroux, M. & Lee, J. C. When do you trust AI? The effect of number presentation detail on consumer trust and acceptance of AI recommendations. Psychol. Mark. 38 , 1140–1155 (2021).

Nguyen, C. T. The seductions of clarity. R. Inst. Philos. Suppl. 89 , 227–255 (2021). This article describes how reductive and quantitative explanations can generate a sense of understanding that is not necessarily correlated with actual understanding .

Fisher, M., Smiley, A. H. & Grillo, T. L. H. Information without knowledge: the effects of internet search on learning. Memory 30 , 375–387 (2022).

Eliseev, E. D. & Marsh, E. J. Understanding why searching the internet inflates confidence in explanatory ability. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 37 , 711–720 (2023).

Fisher, M. & Oppenheimer, D. M. Who knows what? Knowledge misattribution in the division of cognitive labor. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 27 , 292–306 (2021).

Chromik, M., Eiband, M., Buchner, F., Krüger, A. & Butz, A. I think I get your point, AI! The illusion of explanatory depth in explainable AI. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (eds Hammond, T. et al.) 307–317 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).

Strevens, M. No understanding without explanation. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. A 44 , 510–515 (2013).

Ylikoski, P. in Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives (eds De Regt, H. et al.) 100–119 (Univ. Pittsburgh Press, 2009).

Giudice, M. D. The prediction–explanation fallacy: a pervasive problem in scientific applications of machine learning. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4vq8f (2021).

Hofman, J. M. et al. Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science. Nature 595 , 181–188 (2021). This paper highlights the advantages and disadvantages of explanatory versus predictive approaches to modelling, with a focus on applications to computational social science .

Shmueli, G. To explain or to predict? Stat. Sci. 25 , 289–310 (2010).

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Hofman, J. M., Sharma, A. & Watts, D. J. Prediction and explanation in social systems. Science 355 , 486–488 (2017).

Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A. & Moore, D. A. Algorithm appreciation: people prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 151 , 90–103 (2019).

Nguyen, C. T. Cognitive islands and runaway echo chambers: problems for epistemic dependence on experts. Synthese 197 , 2803–2821 (2020).

Breiman, L. Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat. Sci. 16 , 199–215 (2001).

Gao, J. & Wang, D. Quantifying the benefit of artificial intelligence for scientific research. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2304.10578 (2023).

Hanson, B. et al. Garbage in, garbage out: mitigating risks and maximizing benefits of AI in research. Nature 623 , 28–31 (2023).

Kleinberg, J. & Raghavan, M. Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 , e2018340118 (2021). This paper uses formal modelling methods to demonstrate that when companies all rely on the same algorithm to make decisions (an algorithmic monoculture), the overall quality of those decisions is reduced because valuable options can slip through the cracks, even when the algorithm performs accurately for individual companies .

Article   MathSciNet   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hofstra, B. et al. The diversity–innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 , 9284–9291 (2020).

Hong, L. & Page, S. E. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 , 16385–16389 (2004).

Page, S. E. Where diversity comes from and why it matters? Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 44 , 267–279 (2014). This article reviews research demonstrating the benefits of cognitive diversity and diversity in methodological approaches for problem solving and innovation .

Clarke, A. E. & Fujimura, J. H. (eds) The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences (Princeton Univ. Press, 2014).

Silva, V. J., Bonacelli, M. B. M. & Pacheco, C. A. Framing the effects of machine learning on science. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01515-x (2022).

Sassenberg, K. & Ditrich, L. Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2 , 107–114 (2019).

Simon, A. F. & Wilder, D. Methods and measures in social and personality psychology: a comparison of JPSP publications in 1982 and 2016. J. Soc. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2135088 (2022).

Anderson, C. A. et al. The MTurkification of social and personality psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 45 , 842–850 (2019).

Latour, B. in The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments (ed. Candea, M.) 145–162 (Routledge, 2010).

Porter, T. M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton Univ. Press, 1996).

Lazer, D. et al. Meaningful measures of human society in the twenty-first century. Nature 595 , 189–196 (2021).

Knox, D., Lucas, C. & Cho, W. K. T. Testing causal theories with learned proxies. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 25 , 419–441 (2022).

Barberá, P. Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Polit. Anal. 23 , 76–91 (2015).

Brady, W. J., McLoughlin, K., Doan, T. N. & Crockett, M. J. How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Sci. Adv. 7 , eabe5641 (2021).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   ADS   Google Scholar  

Barnes, J., Klinger, R. & im Walde, S. S. Assessing state-of-the-art sentiment models on state-of-the-art sentiment datasets. In Proc. 8th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (eds Balahur, A. et al.) 2–12 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017).

Gitelman, L. (ed.) “Raw Data” is an Oxymoron (MIT Press, 2013).

Breznau, N. et al. Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119 , e2203150119 (2022). This study demonstrates how 73 research teams analysing the same dataset reached different conclusions about the relationship between immigration and public support for social policies, highlighting the subjectivity and uncertainty involved in analysing complex datasets .

Gillespie, T. in Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (eds Gillespie, T. et al.) 167–194 (MIT Press, 2014).

Leonelli, S. Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study (Univ. Chicago Press, 2016).

Wang, A., Kapoor, S., Barocas, S. & Narayanan, A. Against predictive optimization: on the legitimacy of decision-making algorithms that optimize predictive accuracy. ACM J. Responsib. Comput. , https://doi.org/10.1145/3636509 (2023).

Athey, S. Beyond prediction: using big data for policy problems. Science 355 , 483–485 (2017).

del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz, R. Scientific understanding through big data: from ignorance to insights to understanding. Possibility Stud. Soc. 1 , 279–299 (2023).

Nussberger, A.-M., Luo, L., Celis, L. E. & Crockett, M. J. Public attitudes value interpretability but prioritize accuracy in artificial intelligence. Nat. Commun. 13 , 5821 (2022).

Zittrain, J. in The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (eds. Voeneky, S. et al.) 176–184 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022). This article articulates the epistemic risks of prioritizing predictive accuracy over explanatory understanding when AI tools are interacting in complex systems.

Shumailov, I. et al. The curse of recursion: training on generated data makes models forget. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2305.17493 (2023).

Latour, B. Science In Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard Univ. Press, 1987). This book provides strategies and approaches for thinking about science as a social endeavour .

Franklin, S. Science as culture, cultures of science. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24 , 163–184 (1995).

Haraway, D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem. Stud. 14 , 575–599 (1988). This article acknowledges that the objective ‘view from nowhere’ is unobtainable: knowledge, it argues, is always situated .

Harding, S. Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research (Univ. Chicago Press, 2015).

Longino, H. E. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry (Princeton Univ. Press, 1990).

Daston, L. & Galison, P. Objectivity (Princeton Univ. Press, 2007). This book is a historical analysis of the shifting modes of ‘objectivity’ that scientists have pursued, arguing that objectivity is not a universal concept but that it shifts alongside scientific techniques and ambitions .

Prescod-Weinstein, C. Making Black women scientists under white empiricism: the racialization of epistemology in physics. Signs J. Women Cult. Soc. 45 , 421–447 (2020).

Mavhunga, C. What Do Science, Technology, and Innovation Mean From Africa? (MIT Press, 2017).

Schiebinger, L. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science (Harvard Univ. Press, 1991).

Martin, E. The egg and the sperm: how science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male–female roles. Signs J. Women Cult. Soc. 16 , 485–501 (1991). This case study shows how assumptions about gender affect scientific theories, sometimes delaying the articulation of what might be considered to be more accurate descriptions of scientific phenomena .

Harding, S. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? Centen. Rev. 36 , 437–470 (1992). In this article, Harding outlines her position on ‘strong objectivity’, by which clearly articulating one’s standpoint can lead to more robust knowledge claims .

Oreskes, N. Why Trust Science? (Princeton Univ. Press, 2019). This book introduces the reader to 20 years of scholarship in science and technology studies, arguing that the tools the discipline has for understanding science can help to reinstate public trust in the institution .

Rolin, K., Koskinen, I., Kuorikoski, J. & Reijula, S. Social and cognitive diversity in science: introduction. Synthese 202 , 36 (2023).

Hong, L. & Page, S. E. Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. J. Econ. Theory 97 , 123–163 (2001).

Sulik, J., Bahrami, B. & Deroy, O. The diversity gap: when diversity matters for knowledge. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17 , 752–767 (2022).

Lungeanu, A., Whalen, R., Wu, Y. J., DeChurch, L. A. & Contractor, N. S. Diversity, networks, and innovation: a text analytic approach to measuring expertise diversity. Netw. Sci. 11 , 36–64 (2023).

AlShebli, B. K., Rahwan, T. & Woon, W. L. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration. Nat. Commun. 9 , 5163 (2018).

Campbell, L. G., Mehtani, S., Dozier, M. E. & Rinehart, J. Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS ONE 8 , e79147 (2013).

Nielsen, M. W., Bloch, C. W. & Schiebinger, L. Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2 , 726–734 (2018).

Yang, Y., Tian, T. Y., Woodruff, T. K., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119 , e2200841119 (2022).

Kozlowski, D., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R. & Monroe-White, T. Intersectional inequalities in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119 , e2113067119 (2022).

Fehr, C. & Jones, J. M. Culture, exploitation, and epistemic approaches to diversity. Synthese 200 , 465 (2022).

Nakadai, R., Nakawake, Y. & Shibasaki, S. AI language tools risk scientific diversity and innovation. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7 , 1804–1805 (2023).

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine et al. Advancing Antiracism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Organizations: Beyond Broadening Participation (National Academies Press, 2023).

Winner, L. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109 , 121–136 (1980).

Eubanks, V. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (St. Martin’s Press, 2018).

Littmann, M. et al. Validity of machine learning in biology and medicine increased through collaborations across fields of expertise. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2 , 18–24 (2020).

Carusi, A. et al. Medical artificial intelligence is as much social as it is technological. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5 , 98–100 (2023).

Raghu, M. & Schmidt, E. A survey of deep learning for scientific discovery. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2003.11755 (2020).

Bishop, C. AI4Science to empower the fifth paradigm of scientific discovery. Microsoft Research Blog www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/ai4science-to-empower-the-fifth-paradigm-of-scientific-discovery/ (2022).

Whittaker, M. The steep cost of capture. Interactions 28 , 50–55 (2021).

Liesenfeld, A., Lopez, A. & Dingemanse, M. Opening up ChatGPT: Tracking openness, transparency, and accountability in instruction-tuned text generators. In Proc. 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces 1–6 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2023).

Chu, J. S. G. & Evans, J. A. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 , e2021636118 (2021).

Park, M., Leahey, E. & Funk, R. J. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature 613 , 138–144 (2023).

Frith, U. Fast lane to slow science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24 , 1–2 (2020). This article explains the epistemic risks of a hyperfocus on scientific productivity and explores possible avenues for incentivizing the production of higher-quality science on a slower timescale .

Stengers, I. Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science (Wiley, 2018).

Lake, B. M. & Baroni, M. Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network. Nature 623 , 115–121 (2023).

Feinman, R. & Lake, B. M. Learning task-general representations with generative neuro-symbolic modeling. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2006.14448 (2021).

Schölkopf, B. et al. Toward causal representation learning. Proc. IEEE 109 , 612–634 (2021).

Mitchell, M. AI’s challenge of understanding the world. Science 382 , eadm8175 (2023).

Sartori, L. & Bocca, G. Minding the gap(s): public perceptions of AI and socio-technical imaginaries. AI Soc. 38 , 443–458 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. S. Bassett, W. J. Brady, S. Helmreich, S. Kapoor, T. Lombrozo, A. Narayanan, M. Salganik and A. J. te Velthuis for comments. We also thank C. Buckner and P. Winter for their feedback and suggestions.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Lisa Messeri, M. J. Crockett

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

Lisa Messeri

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

M. J. Crockett

University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to the research and writing of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lisa Messeri or M. J. Crockett .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature thanks Cameron Buckner, Peter Winter and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Messeri, L., Crockett, M.J. Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research. Nature 627 , 49–58 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0

Download citation

Received : 31 July 2023

Accepted : 31 January 2024

Published : 06 March 2024

Issue Date : 07 March 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Ai is no substitute for having something to say.

Nature Reviews Physics (2024)

Perché gli scienziati si fidano troppo dell'intelligenza artificiale - e come rimediare

Nature Italy (2024)

Why scientists trust AI too much — and what to do about it

Nature (2024)

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.