supply chain management in healthcare a literature review

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, a systematic literature review on supply chain risk management: is healthcare management a forsaken research field.

Benchmarking: An International Journal

ISSN : 1463-5771

Article publication date: 24 November 2020

Issue publication date: 29 March 2021

This paper aims to present a systematic literature review (SLR) to investigate how supply chain risk management (SCRM) is applied to the healthcare supply chains and which improvement opportunities are being missed in this segment.

Design/methodology/approach

This SLR used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method to answer three research questions: (1) Which are the main gaps concerning healthcare supply chain risk management (HCSCRM)? (2) What is the definition of HCSCRM? and (3) What are the risk management techniques and approaches used in healthcare supply chains?

The authors present a complete summary of the HCSCRM body of research, investigating research strings like clinical engineering and high reliability organizations (HROs) and its relations with HCSCRM; (1) This research revealed the five pillars of HCSCRM; (2) The authors proposed a formal definition for HCSCRM considering all the literature blocks explored and (3) The authors generated a list of risks present in healthcare supply chains resulting from extensive article research.

Research limitations/implications

The authors only reviewed international journal articles (published in the English language), excluding conference papers, dissertations and theses, textbooks, book chapters, unpublished articles and notes. In addition, the study did not thoroughly investigate specific countries' particularities concerning how the healthcare providers are organized.

Originality/value

The contribution of this article is threefold: (1) To the best of authors knowledge, there is no other SLR about HCSCRM published in the scientific literature by the time of realization of authors’ work, suggesting that is the first effort to fulfill this research gap; (2) Following the previous contribution, in this work the authors propose a first formal definition for HCSCRM and (3) The authors analyzed concepts such as clinical engineering and HROs to establish the building blocks of HCSCRM.

• Supply chain risk management
• Clinical engineering
• High reliability organizations
• Healthcare management
• Systematic literature review

Senna, P. , Reis, A. , Santos, I.L. , Dias, A.C. and Coelho, O. (2021), "A systematic literature review on supply chain risk management: is healthcare management a forsaken research field?", Benchmarking: An International Journal , Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 926-956. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2020-0266

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Lean supply chain management in healthcare: a systematic review and meta-study

PurposeBy applying a systematic literature review, this paper aims to identify the major healthcare problem domains (i.e.target areas) for lean supply chain management (LSCM) and to provide a list of the most common techniques for implementing LSCM in healthcare. Moreover, this study intends to investigate various contingency factors that may have influenced the selection of LSCM target areas or the application of LSCM techniques by healthcare organizations.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review was carried out following the method presented by Tranfield et al. (2003). Thereby, 280 peer-reviewed journal articles, published between 1995 and 2018, were selected, profiled and reviewed. In total, 75 papers were also selected for a qualitative analysis, known as meta-study, on the basis of high relevancy to the research objectives.FindingsThis work extracts, from previous research, a set of target areas for improving supply chain in healthcare by applying lean approaches. The work also unifies the language of lean thinking and supply chain in healthcare by defining metaphors in circumstances under which healthcare organizations pursue similar objectives from their supply chain management and lean programs (Schmitt, 2005). This paper also outlines a list of applications of lean for supply chain improvement in healthcare. Finally, a set of contingency factors in the field of lean supply chain in healthcare is found via the published literature.Practical implicationsThis paper provides insights for decision-makers in the healthcare industry regarding the benefits of implementing LSCM, and it identifies contingency factors affecting the implementation of LSCM principles for healthcare. Implementing LSCM can help healthcare organizations improve the following domains: internal interaction between employees, supply chain cost management, medication distribution systems, patient safety and instrument utilization.Social implicationsThe research shows potential synthesis of LSCM with the healthcare industry’s objectives, and, thus, the outcome of this research is likely to have positive influence on the quality and cost of healthcare services. The objectives of the healthcare industry are cost reduction and providing better service quality, and LSCM implementation could be an effective solution to help healthcare to achieve these objectives.Originality/valueThe prime value of this paper lies in conducting a systematic literature review using a meta-study to identify the major factors of implementing LSCM in healthcare. Only a few other studies have been published in the literature about LSCM in healthcare.

• Related Documents

Dynamic capabilities in humanitarian supply chain management: a systematic literature review

PurposeThe main purpose of this paper is to examine the extant literature of humanitarian supply chain management (HSCM) which specifically use dynamic capabilities (DCs) view. By this means, the objectives of this study are to identify and assess the DCs used in the HSCM context, the factors positively and negatively affecting the DCs and how the DCs affect humanitarian supply chain (HSC) operations. Furthermore, this research aims to give directions for future research in the field of HSCM.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts systematic literature review (SLR) approach proposed by Denyer and Tranfield (2009). Based on a SLR, this study synthesizes and compares the evidence, has a specific focus and research questions, has certain inclusion and exclusion criteria and provides evidence-based implications to the researchers and practitioners. This is a method which is replicable, transparent and auditable. The SLR methodology provides scholars and practitioners a basis for comprehending the current situation of relevant topic and taking correct steps in their future actions.FindingsThis SLR deduces that applying DCs view is still in its infancy in the HSCM literature. The result of this SLR reveals that supply chain agility (SCA), supply chain resilience (SCR), reconfiguration/transformation, integration, (short-term) collaboration, sustaining, sensing, seizing and knowledge access DCs have been used in the HSCM literature. In addition, it is determined that only one paper analyzed the influence of DCs on predisaster performance while rest of the papers focused on the postdisaster performance.Originality/valueThe result of the exhaustive literature search indicates that this is the first SLR that specifically analyzes the application of DCs view in the HSCM domain. This investigation determined the DCs used in HSCM and revealed the relations between the dependent and independent variables through the comprehensive model. In this way, this review provides a guidance to researchers in conduct their future investigations and practitioners to carry out supply chain (SC) operations by considering the factors affecting their operations.

Competence in supply chain management: a systematic review

Purpose This paper aims to present an integrated view of the literature published on all aspects and facets of competence in supply chain management (SCM) and furthermore provides a framework for classifying and analyzing literature to facilitate further study, practice and research. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review identified 98 peer-reviewed scientific journal publications on the subject of competence in SCM. Findings This review identifies and classifies the key content of the subject based on whose competence (level of analysis) and the type of competence (competence element), resulting in a framework that brings together aspects at the individual and organizational level, and of the functional, relational, managerial and behavioral elements of competence from the SCM literature. It furthermore displays the timeliness and wide-ranging character of the subject, as presented by the evolutionary timeline and the main research streams. Research limitations/implications Although competence in SCM is a key to business success, the subject is ambiguous and an explicit need exists for more research. This paper provides a foundation for future examination of and theory building in this subject. It also alerts researchers to complementary studies outside of their own “customary” domains. Practical implications This paper can support managers in their pursuit to secure competence in SCM and thereby improve outcomes on both individual and organizational level. It can furthermore assist in the development of relevant programs and training sessions. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this work represents the first systematic literature review on the subject of competence in SCM. In addition, it proposes a taxonomy for mapping and evaluating research on this subject.

Towards responsible conflict minerals supply chain management: a systematic literature review and a supply chain governance framework

PurposeLiterature on conflict minerals supply chain management issues has witnessed a significant surge during the last decade. The authors review how CM research addressed supply chain issues over the last decades and present a critical assessment of such literature based on supply chain governance theory.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review approach was adopted, and a sample of 122 papers were identified in relevant journals. A descriptive, thematic and content analysis of the papers is presented to delineate the structure and the main research clusters of the literature.FindingsThe authors provide a comprehensive assessment of CMSC literature and identify four main research clusters. Most research has focussed on operational practices and adopted a fragmented approach to CMSC issues. Accordingly, the authors provide research propositions related to under-explored aspects in extant literature.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has a number of implications. Practitioners and researchers will gain a greater understanding of specific CMSC issues which have been addressed in current literature and of how responsible CMSC actions can be implemented.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first literature reviews of publications on CMSC from a supply chain governance perspective. This review presents an overarching map of CMSC literature and a series of propositions to inform future research.

Lean Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review of Practices, Barriers and Contextual Factors Inherent to Its Implementation

The thematic landscape of literature on supply chain management in india: a systematic literature review.

PurposeTo assess the state of supply chain management (SCM) research in India and to understand the research trends and methodologies used. The present study also aims to create a taxonomy of the subject areas researched in India.Design/methodology/approachThe present study employed the systematic literature review methodology. Literature from 395 peer journal papers in 67 leading journals over a 20-year period (2000–2020 Quarter-1) was comprehensively reviewed and assessed.FindingsSCM research in India started around the year 2000. The quantum of research was low (single digit) until 2010. There has been steady growth over the last decade, and over 50% of the total papers up until now has been published in the last four years. The present study created a three-tiered taxonomy of the subject areas and classified the papers as per it. The first tier (level-1) has seven categories (SCM strategy, network design, SCM processes and integration, IT systems, skills, performance measurement and others). A perusal of the newly created taxonomy revealed that, except for a few areas under level-1 categories (such as SCM processes and SCM strategy), the other level-1 categories have not seen much research. Similarly, there is little or no research in a large number of level-2 categories (such as outsourcing strategy, channel strategy, demand management, demand fulfillment, customer relationship management, integrated supply chain planning, new product development, returns, supply chain orientation, performance monitoring, performance improvement, SCM adoption process, SCM implementation issues and quantified benefits of SCM). Methodologically, the rigor of SCM research in India needs improvement.Originality/valueA comprehensive taxonomy of SCM subject areas researched in India at three cascading levels was created for the first time in the present study. The taxonomy will help provide researchers with a clear understanding of the structure of the subject areas and help in identifying areas where research has been carried out and the subject areas where gaps exist for future research to proceed. The present study also provides an overview of the methodological rigor of SCM research in India and points out some of the limitations that researchers should avoid in future studies.

Human resource management issues in supply chain management research

Purpose – With today's increasing globalization and associated growing demand for talented supply chain managers, human resource management (HRM) in supply chain management (SCM) has emerged as a top priority for firms. However, a thorough analysis of HRM issues in SCM research has not been made so far. To address this gap this paper provides a systematic and comprehensive literature review. The purpose of this paper is threefold: to analyze HRM/SCM issues published in leading SCM journals, to identify different HRM research streams in the SCM literature and to propose areas for future research. Design/methodology/approach – This paper employs a systematic literature review methodology. The selected journal articles are categorized on the basis of an analytical framework that contains seven HRM/SCM research streams derived from the extant literature. Findings – The systematic literature review indicates a growing focus on HRM/SCM issues in recent years, a trend that is predicted to continue. Additionally, the study findings show that research has primarily emphasized certain popular categories while other crucial ones lack analysis. Originality/value – This paper presents a structured overview of 109 peer-reviewed articles published in leading academic journals from 1998 to 2014. The review structures extant HRM/SCM literature and highlights its critical importance in SCM research. Topical gaps in the literature are identified as areas for future research.

Information and digital technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean supply chain management: a systematic literature review

Sustainable service supply chain management: from a systematic literature review to a conceptual framework for performance evaluation of service only supply chain.

PurposeDespite increasing attentions to sustainable service supply chain management (SSSCM), a framework for performance evaluation of sustainable service only supply chain management (SSOSCM) is still missing. This paper tries to fill this gap and provides a novel conceptual framework.Design/methodology/approachThe articles related to SSSCM are fetched from the databases of SCOPUS and Web of Science. Analysis of 174 articles identified by the systematic literature review is further carried out.FindingsThis research identifies the sustainable practices for service only supply chain (SOSC) as environmental management, social management, economic management, customer management, health, safety and risk management, technical sustainability, institutional sustainability, information and technology management as well as two performance measurement criteria as operational performance and organizational performance. This paper provides a novel conceptual framework for the performance evaluation of SSOSCM. The results call for future exploration in the following three broad directions-(1) customer's perception, involvement and their behaviour towards sustainability in SOSC context; (2) trade-off, incentive mechanism and multilevel evaluation for achieving sustainability in SOSC and (3) sustainability in SOSC from various point of views.Practical implicationsThe managers can use the framework to assess the performance of the organization while researchers can explore the discussed research gaps.Originality/valueThis is the first paper that provides a novel conceptual framework for the performance evaluation of SSOSCM as well as potential future research directions.

Application of blockchain technology for agrifood supply chain management: a systematic literature review on benefits and challenges

PurposeThis study aims to explore and analyze the application of blockchain technology (BKCT) in agrifood supply chain management (AFSM).Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review (SLR) using Scopus, Emerald and Web of Science covering publications from 2016 to 2021 (till June). Out of 429 papers, 89 papers were shortlisted from journals based on citation analysis. The citation analysis was followed by a content analysis was for an in-depth analysis.FindingsRegarding the application of BKCT in the agrifood supply chain, the study highlights the issue of food safety, traceability, transparency, eliminating intermediaries and integrating Internet of things (IoT) with BKCT as prominent applications in the agrifood sector. The study also uses the case of honey supply chain to use the explored applications in the agrifood sector and provides a traceability solution based on blockchain integrated with IoT. The challenges of BKCT as identified in the study are scalability, privacy, security, lack of regulations and lack of skills and training.Research limitations/implicationsThe review considers only academic papers obtained from specific databases with their relevance based on number of citations.Originality/valueThe study contributes to filling the existing research gap through this SLR on the application of BKCT in AFSCM. The content analysis further assists in exploring the benefits and challenges of BKCT in the agrifood sector. Thus, the academic articles selected aid in this process.

Mobile supply chain management in the Industry 4.0 era

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify avenues for future research in mobile supply chain management (mSCM) in the advent of Industry 4.0. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was used to identify, classify, and analyze current knowledge, identify trends, and propose recommendations for future research. Findings Other research fields, such as operations, production, industrial engineering, and computer science, seem to have a head start in research into Industry 4.0. Several avenues are suggested for investigation under an information systems lens. Research limitations/implications Despite the care taken in the systematic literature review, the language (English), the selected keywords, and selected databases represent a natural limitation. Practical implications With Industry 4.0 at the top of the agenda of managers and countries, it is important to identify relevant research avenues. Originality/value A gap between the extant literature on mSCM and new concerns raised by Industry 4.0 is presented, and some research opportunities to close those gaps are proposed.

Export Citation Format

Share document.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Issues in Healthcare Supply Chain Management: From Literature to Practice

2020, International Journal of Supply Chain Management

This research aims to identify the main issues on healthcare supply chain management literature, to analyse a real healthcare unit supply chain. The results are a framework compiling literature review, that allowed redesigning the medicines and materials supply chain of a network of hospitals in Brazil. The method consisted in conducting the literature review, describing the actual model of the healthcare units using process management approach and designing the new supply chain, adopting Lean Healthcare tools, such as A3 to guide the analysis and problems solution. The study demonstrates that the literature lacks healthcare supply chain management solutions, since most articles have a pharmaceutical or care bias. Thus, this article contributes with an applied experience, which benefits both literature and organizational practice.

Related Papers

International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing

Purpose This paper aims to review the healthcare supply chain (HSC) literature along various areas and to find out the gap in it. Design/methodology/approach In total, 143 research papers were reviewed during 1996-2017. A critical review was carried out in various dimensions such as research methodologies/data collection method (empirical, case study and literature review) and inquiry mode of research methodology (qualitative, quantitative and mixed), country-specific, targeted area, research aim and year of publication. Findings Supply chain (SC) operations, performance measurement, inventory management, lean and agile operation, and use of information technology were well studied and analyzed, however, employee and customer training, tracking and visibility of medicines, cold chain management, human resource practices, risk management and waste management are felt to be important areas but not much attention were made in this direction. Research limitations/implications Mainly dru...

José Sequeiros

A situação atual das unidades de saúde é caracterizada pelo custo crescente da prestação dos cuidados, pelo consequente agravamento da situação financeira e pelos processos complicados e morosos. Aliados à procura crescente, podem tornar-se fatores que tornam a resposta do serviço deficiente. Devido a esta situação, uma gestão mais eficiente e eficaz da logística e da cadeia de abastecimento é reconhecida transversalmente como uma das principais áreas de melhoria. A fim de dar a conhecer quais as áreas a melhorar, vários objetivos foram contemplados neste trabalho, como a análise dos métodos e critérios de seleção de medicamentos em farmácias hospitalares, a definição de obstáculos à gestão racional de stocks e a análise de dados históricos para previsão da procura futura num hospital público português. O estudo revelou que alguns dos 1.346 produtos presentes no ERP da farmácia não têm dados históricos suficientes para criar uma previsão precisa. Neste contexto, e considerando um ní...

American Journal of Industrial and Business Management

Diganta Debnath , Farzana chowdhury , Seeratus Sabah

2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM)

Behnam Malmir

Farzad Firouzi Jahantigh,Ph.D

Navaneethakrishnan P

Guilherme L Roehe Vaccaro

BAHAR ÖZYÖRÜK

IAEME PUBLICATION

IAEME Publication

This paper seeks to concentrate on the deployment of supply chain management strategy in the health-care field which is very challenging. Healthcare holds a primary stake within the provider financial system. Although some of the modern supply chain practices can be used to test the performance of service sector supply chain. Existing studies do not inspect supply chain management practices in an integrated manner and do not consider all reasonable execution measurements. To address these gaps, this paper presents a precise summary and develops the structure for identifying the supply chain management practices that may contribute to continual performance in hospitals. The purpose of the study is to improve the commercial enterprise strategies, making the methodology of Supply Chain Management to be more resilient, greater agile and as an end result more competitive..

Supply Chain Management-an International Journal

Mohammed Ims

RELATED PAPERS

Diana Morales

Madu Munawaroh

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

Mahsa Omidian

haijun wang

Abdulmajeed Alkhalaf

Neophilologus

Martine Braekman

The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education

PEDRO GUEDES

Isabella Verdinelli

Arwandi Harahap

Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care

shane dulemba

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Mohammed Halawa

… de Formación e …

Miguel Candel Valero

Equine Veterinary Journal

navid mashouf

Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat

MARINA DYAH KUSUMAWATI

Applied Physics A

Bulat Rameev

Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences

Luiz Órion Gomes

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science

frank fowley

Ecología Aplicada

Wilfredo Mendoza

Temas Laborales Revista Andaluza De Trabajo Y Bienestar Social

Juan Carlos Alvarez Cortes

Paolo Luca Bernardini

Paolo Andre

Liubel Cruz Fernández

mjnvffd nnjgffd

Infection and Immunity

Kim Brogden

Revista de Letras

Fernando Felício Pachi Filho

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Saudi Pharm J
• v.30(12); 2022 Dec

Just-in-time approach in healthcare inventory management: Does it really work?

Bandar balkhi.

a Clinical pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

b Pharmacoeconomic Unit, Pharmaceutical Care Service Administration, Armed Forces Hospital - Southern Region (AFHSR), Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia

Abdullah Alshahrani

c Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

d Global Center for Mass Gathering Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia

Healthcare organizations need to efficiently use their available resources, improve their productivity, reduce operating costs, and provide high-quality services. Just in time (JIT) is an approach that has benefited the healthcare industry in these regards, improving patient outcomes by reducing waste and non-value-adding activities. As such, our main purpose in this study was to discuss the use of JIT systems in healthcare inventory management and highlight their importance, as well as explore the advantages and limitations of JIT systems in healthcare management systems. We also explored supply chain issues in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic and provide strategies and recommendations for improvement.

1. Background

The healthcare industry has faced many challenges in improving quality of care and patient satisfaction while reducing costs( Moons et al., 2019 ). Inventory accounts for a large proportion of the costs of healthcare organizations (HCOs) ( Kelle et al., 2012 ). Approximately USD 83 billion is spent in the U.S. on hospital supplies such as disposable gloves and gowns every year( Scanlin, 1997 , Kua-Walker, 2010 ). Furthermore, the amount spent on inventory-related activities such as handling, storage, transport, and restocking inventories is extremely high, accounting for more than one-third of hospital budgets( Dennision et al., 1994 , Kua-Walker, 2010 ). Additionally, U.S. hospitals waste approximately USD 25.4 billion each year on unnecessary supply chain spending( NAVIGANT 2018 ).

Healthcare institutions are responsible for planning, purchasing, managing, handling, tracking, and transporting stock (e.g., medications, medical equipment, and supplies). These activities are critical for their operations. Inventory and supply chain management primarily focuses on improving efficiency, controlling costs, and receiving and distributing the needed supplies on time to provide improved patient care( De Vries 2011 ). Supply chain management is key for organizing workflow and tracking inventory, purchases, orders, and payments. Supply chain management in healthcare settings requires skills in managing costs, inventory forecasting, and space management, while inventory management involves in-depth knowledge of logistics and financial aspects of stock ( Dwivedi and Kothiyal 2012 ). These management systems help to protect organizations from both material and financial losses by maintaining an efficient and accurate record of items and supplies.

Inappropriate inventory management results in substantial losses for healthcare organizations and negatively impacts the quality of patient care( Brandon‐Jones et al., 2014 ). Inadequate management can potentially lead to overstocking, meaning that extra assets are retained in inventory, thereby restricting cash flow and the development of the organization. Conversely, understocking leads to shortages and disturbs the stability of the services provided by the organization( Moons et al., 2019 ). Poor inventory management is one of the largest causes of inefficiency in healthcare, and efficient supply chain management can help hospitals to reduce costs and optimize their operations.

Reducing costs while improving the quality of care is essential in the healthcare industry. Hence, many HCOs are looking for innovative tools that will allow more efficient supply chain practices, helping to reduce costs without affecting the quality of their services ( Lee et al., 2011 , Mathur et al., 2018 ). Many inventory management systems applying just-in-time (JIT) approaches were working well prior to the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the pandemic created unprecedented challenges for these systems. Healthcare supply chains were negatively impacted and there were considerable disruptions to the supply of essential health items such as personal protective equipment (PPE) and ventilators, along with many medications( Chowdhury et al., 2021 ).

2. Objective

Our aim in this study was to provide an overview of techniques that can be used to improve healthcare operations by implementing JIT systems and to discuss their benefits to the healthcare industry . Our findings provide insight into supply chain management by reviewing the relevant literature and exploring the integration of JIT concepts and practices into healthcare systems as a potential cost-saving strategy for healthcare organizations and systems as a whole . Additionally, we describe the use of JIT approaches during the pandemic and the benefits and risks associated with using this method. We outline future implications for JIT systems along with future research directions.

3. JIT systems

JIT is an innovative stock management strategy: a supply–demand system encouraging flow-type production that attempts to precisely match the demand for care with supply( Baum 2006 ). The concept of JIT was originally developed by Toyota Motor Company in Japan, and was then applied in a variety of industries worldwide, including healthcare. JIT systems can quickly respond to demand without the need for excess inventory. In JIT systems, suppliers deliver small quantities of supplies to HCOs as they are needed, which avoids the problem of overstocked inventory and eventually lowers operational costs. JIT is a comprehensive inventory management technique that reduces waste and eliminates non-value-added items( Li 2015 ).

JIT systems restock inventory and place a reorder for future resources when a preset minimum value is reached, using an indicator when more stock is needed to meet the current demand ( Karkowski et al., 2017 ). For each supply category, the order volume is determined to avoid a lack of stock during the time between orders. Differences in demand between different types of supplies are expected, and must be determined using robust software. Some items that must be prioritized, such as life-saving medical and surgical items and other essential items; these are defined, while the items to which JIT can be applied are identified( Kester et al., 2001 ). Therefore, JIT requires the establishment of a monitoring and evaluating system that is able to detect and determine minimal acceptable inventory levels.

In JIT, healthcare organizations and suppliers work together to deliver inventory on time. To successfully run a JIT system, a close relationship must be built between the HCOs and suppliers( Karkowski et al., 2017 ). Without excessive inventory, healthcare organizations will depend on their suppliers. JIT is demanding on suppliers, so having reliable suppliers is an important factor in building the relationship between the HCOs and suppliers. Hospital workflows will be facilitated as HCOs better understand the supplier’s capabilities, and suppliers better understand the HCO’s needs ( Kua-Walker 2010 ).

4. Benefits and risks of JIT systems

4.1. benefits of jit systems.

JIT systems work well in normal settings, providing solutions to many issues faced by other inventory systems as well as many long-term benefits. Overstocking results in waste and lost and damaged items ( Neil, 2004 , Baum, 2006 ). The several benefits of using JIT in healthcare organizations include increased quality and efficiency, and savings in healthcare resources. Applying this method creates a stabilized work schedule and increases productivity.( Siddiqui 2022 ) Therefore, the adoption of JIT by healthcare facilities has been widespread. The most common benefit of using JIT is cost reduction; In United State JIT has resulted in annual savings of approximately USD $3–11 million per hospital, which is around 10 %–17 % in savings ( Scanlin, 1997 , Baum, 2006 ).

In a JIT system, stock is delivered by suppliers when needed, which reduces inventory costs by reducing unused inventory, freeing up money for HCOs to use for other care activities and care facilities( Aptel and Pourjalali 2001 ). JIT provides HCOs with an opportunity to minimize warehouse space, thus reducing inventory holding costs and investment in stock( Baum 2006 ). Other cost reductions include the labor costs required to move and manage supplies; the number of workers can be reduced and some warehouse processes can be automated( NAVIGANT 2018 ). This can also result in improved productivity as employees are able to focus on tasks related to patient care instead of unnecessarily handling inventory ( Neil, 2004 , Kua-Walker, 2010 ).

JIT helps to increase inventory turnover ratios, leading to higher efficiency by preventing products from staying in storage for long periods. In addition, applying JIT saves time; with a smaller inventory, the time spent on ordering, purchasing and managing stock is lowered, which can improve productivity and services. Monitoring and management of inventory can also be improved because of the low number of items in the inventory( Kaswan et al., 2019 ). Close management of smaller stocks reduces the chance of wasting inventory items. Another advantage of the JIT approach includes improved work and operation flows, enhancing overall HCO productivity.( Canel et al., 2000 ) JIT can also improve service quality, leading to increased customer satisfaction( Jackson 2017 ). The JIT approach has several benefits for inventory management in HCOs, but some concerns have been raised due to the nature of the healthcare industry.

4.2. Risks of JIT systems

One of the major concerns with JIT systems is the uncertainty and unpredictability of the volume of hospital work( Neil 2004 ), which can pose a serious risk to hospital operations when the demand unexpectedly increases and the current inventory is insufficient. This may lead to zero stock, which can seriously affect patient care( Baum 2006 ). This is the top reason why HCOs hesitate to use JIT systems. Another issue regards suppliers, particularly for vendors that import items from overseas and may experience disruptions in shipments. To address these issues, stock levels need to be closely monitored and managed.

One solution is to keep a buffer inventory to avoid stock running out. However, this buffer or emergency inventory needs to be balanced to avoid holding a large amount of stock, which would conflict with the main goal of a JIT system, or holding too little stock, which would not resolve the issues or address the risk of shortages. A second solution is to use JIT systems only for general suppliers items that do not directly impact patient care or affect emergency situations like labels, swap, pads, linens, etc ( Doughty et al., 2020 ), ( Kua-Walker 2010 ).This helps to ensure that inventory costs remain low without risking patient safety. The improvement of cash flow and cost saving are mainly coming from reduction inventory holding, minimize storage area, utilities, personnel and damage items.( Lai and Cheng, 2016 , Raj et al., 2022 ). Moreover, companies and manufacturers could not have the ability to bring the raw materials during the lockdown and even after restriction were lifted so for the critical items such as ventilators and intensive care unit items, its highly important to be on set without interruption( Raj et al., 2022 ). A third solution is to establish a contingency response plan with the supplier or with other healthcare institutions as well as considering a rapid communication between all sectors in timely manner to reduce the delaying of delivery and avoiding overstocking and shortages (mutual aid) (( Cheng and Podolsky, 1996 , Lai and Cheng, 2016 , Peng and Pang, 2019 , Okeagu et al., 2021 ). This type of effective and timely manner agreement should include essential supplies and priority medicines was very useful to overcome JIT limitation and maintaining resilience supply chain during health crisis like COVID-19. ( Doughty et al., 2020 ).

JIT systems are difficult to operate and require the close monitoring of supply consumption. The supply forecast needs to be calculated using statistical tools and techniques to ensure accurate forecasting( Li 2015 ), as JIT relies on accurate data describing the consumption of the resources. Thus, JIT may not be ideal for every institution and often requires extensive preliminary planning to ensure that the system can work appropriately. Each institution needs to assess their situation and ability to establish a JIT system by weighing the costs and benefits of such a system.

Another issue related to JIT is transportation and delivery costs, which tend to be high. The cost mainly depends on the transport type and vehicle used, and the distance traveled. The system is designed to decrease inventory and order stock when needed, relying on the certainty of on-time delivery. This may mean frequent deliveries, which decreases efficiency and increases delivery-associated costs, which is an additional cost factor that needs to be considered and discussed with suppliers( Kim and Rifai 1992 ).

5. JIT systems during COVID-19: increases in demand

The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially impacted global supply chains and extensively disrupted of the flow of supplies, increasing demand for key materials( Leite et al., 2020 ). These supply chain disruptions had serious consequences that placed health workers and patients at risk. During the pandemic, the high demands for PPE, medications, and equipment such as ventilators exposed the instabilities in healthcare supply chain frameworks, many of which relied on JIT systems( Chunning and Kumar 2000 ). Accordingly, many HCOs faced major issues with their supply chains and experienced shortages and understocking of many of important supplies. Additionally, the supplies of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) from China and India, vaccines, and essential medical supplies were limited, delaying global supply amidst surges in demand. The world is still suffering from disruptions in its supply chains( Chowdhury et al., 2021 ).

To protect local supplies, some countries in Asia and Europe terminated the export of PPE, leading to a continued reduction in global stockpiles. Thus, countries that mainly depended on imported supplies experienced serious PPE shortages; the pandemic exposed their fragility and dependency on the current supply chain system. The shortages during the pandemic were directly related to the use of JIT systems which failed to meet the unexpectedly high demand, placing many HCOs at risk of having insufficient supplies. The challenges that arose during the pandemic showed why the JIT method should be used with caution in healthcare systems, proving that HCOs need extra supplies to mitigate the risks of present and future delays and disruptions.( Andaneswari and Rohmaiena, n.d. , Gereffi, 2020 ).

The experience obtained from the pandemic has highlighted the importance of proactive supply chain management in healthcare. During the pandemic, JIT systems created havoc for healthcare organizations, driving up the costs of supplies and placing extra pressure on already taxed healthcare budgets and systems that were trying to provide life-saving care. Thus, under JIT systems, due to lack of sustainable inventory for such these items, if inventory is unavailable during a pandemic, HCOs may experience widespread stock shortage. Many medications necessary for mechanical ventilation (sedatives, vasopressors, and paralytics) were in limited supply.

6. Recommendations to overcome current challenges

6.1. digitize and automate supply chain processes.

Globally, supply chain systems have faced many challenges, especially during the pandemic, indicating that a new strategy is warranted to address the shortcomings of the current system. To minimize inefficiencies and build robust systems, we recommend building an integrated supply chain framework using tools such as big data, the Internet of Things (IOT), blockchain, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) to directly link HCOs to suppliers and facilitate HCO purchasing processes. These tools can help HCOs to accurately predict their demand and visually track their consumption ( Dash et al., 2019 , Wang et al., 2019 ). This transition from traditional operators to a more automated system that enables AI and machine learning will require a secure, transparent, and trustworthy platform to exchange information among all stakeholders as an efficient inventory management tool. This integrated supply chain system will improve inventory levels, rationalize processes, streamline purchasing, and help to build better relationships with suppliers. The supplier–HCO relationship is key to improving hospital supply chain systems, as these systems are built on the trust between hospitals and suppliers( Gurtu and Johny 2021 ).

6.2. Positive behavior strategies

JIT can benefit healthcare organizations by helping them to operate more efficiently, minimize operation costs, and increase productivity. However, these systems need special considerations to run successfully: positive attitudes and behavior toward the new methods must be developed, and the capacity and readiness of the current system for a major change must be assessed. Moreover, estimations of consumption patterns must be accurate, so tools are needed to calculate and predict which items are associated with higher (e.g., lifesaving items) and lower risk if out of stock. The long-term impacts of the pandemic have shown many healthcare systems the benefit of direct relationships with suppliers. This emphasizes the importance of cooperation and trust between HCOs and suppliers. Hospitals being directly connected to suppliers, without an intermediary distributor, will facilitate the supply process and will determine whether a given supply chain is cost-effective or needs modification. Applying a supplier relationship management strategy can be used as a tool to create a better supplier relationship system by closely measure supplier processes and build a more efficient and positive relationship. Institution that adapt such strategy demonstrated a substantial benefit in term of reduction of inventory, sustainability, and efficiency process even for centralized procurement.( Ezzahra et al., 2018 , Amoako-Gyampah et al., 2019 ) Once a system is working, employees need to be aware of its value and be trained on how to use it properly. After implementation, the system will require continuous evaluation and monitoring to inform necessary adjustments which is essential for a success of JIT system.( Okeagu et al., 2021 ).

6.3. Strategic sourcing

Despite the financial and nonfinancial benefits of JIT systems, such a system may not be the right choice for all HCOs; for some, JIT may not optimize the healthcare supply chain. Ensuring the maintenance of an emergency inventory is the best and safest choice for the healthcare industry during pandemics( Leaven et al., 2017 ). Adopting a direct sourcing model can both ensure that an organization receives the products it needs at a sustainable cost and that supplies will be sufficient during disruptions. Additionally, diversification by having multiple suppliers will mitigate future shortages, as having a single supplier may put an organization at risk of running out of stock.

6.4. National stockpiles

A regional stockpiling infrastructure is one method of overcoming JIT inventory issues. Strategic national stockpiles (SNSs) help a whole region to secure healthcare services by maintaining strategic quantities of all medical and surgical items. These stockpiled supplies are vital for supporting national health security during pandemics and other crises. Supplies from these stockpiles can be delivered to HCOs within hours( Branson 2021 ). Countries that used their SNSs during the pandemic were able to meet the surge in demand and overcome the medical shortages to some extent, especially at the beginning of the pandemic. However, the stockpile system was ultimately unable to equip various regions with necessary healthcare items to ensure the safe and effective management of the pandemic( Rule 2021 ). These SNSs were deficient, so a more substantial and well-maintained stockpile approach is needed to provide a more robust response to any unexpected surges in demand and to anticipate future needs( Gerberding 2020 ). The pandemic has highlighted the importance of strengthening the domestic healthcare supply chain system and enhancing communication at all levels between government and private entities to enable sharing of information regarding supply and needs, especially during crises( Huang and Varmus 2021 ).

6.5. Just-in-case systems

Healthcare leaders have learned many lessons during the pandemic, so they will hopefully be prepared for future challenges. The COVID 19 pandemic has forced leaders to rethink and consider just-in-case (JIC) instead of JIT systems, which focus on lean management by reducing inefficiencies and waste through the supply chain and lowering investments. JIC is a type of demand-based supply chain system. The key to JIC is focusing more on the continuity of work and operations. Creating an inventory buffer through JIC systems is one way to mitigate supply chain disruptions and prevent HCOs running out of supplies( Swierczek and Szozda 2019 ). During purchasing planning, the planner creates a 10 % inventory buffer, particularly for life-saving and essential items, in case of high demand caused by an influx of patients. Thus, some HCOs might consider moving from JIT to JIC systems, maintaining sufficient inventories to minimize uncertainties in supply and demand, and focusing on balancing efficiency with a flexible and reliable supply chain, and using “Par” level for each item when it becomes in a very low level and even an one item is a backbone of JIC process( Coslett 2022 ). It could be organized by using such inventory software connecting to each item by barcode would track each one. if the attention is not paid from warehouse, HCOs would confront shortages. However, JIC systems require increased stock to address potential delivery delays, which increases costs for the organization, which is opposite of the intent of JIT approaches. In a JIC system, an emergency plan must be considered, and higher costs and longer delivery times must be expected. Thus, caution is required in the assessment of the risks and benefits of these systems to ensure that the inventory buffer costs less than the risks it would offset( Chopra and Sodhi 2004 ). Nonetheless, both benefits cannot be simultaneously obtained. JIC overcomes the limitations of JIT and satisfies customer demands, but at higher cost. Thus, a balance should be reached between JIT and JIC approaches to achieve a balanced and resilient system( Kerr and Houghton 2010 ).

6.6. Supply chain risk management systems (SCRMs)

During pandemics, demand may surge, exceeding the ability of the supply chain to quickly respond. Unanticipated surges can disturb the normal inventory plan and may compromise both public and national health security during pandemics and other emergencies. A vital task in healthcare decision making is to recognize and address critical risks in any supply chain system. Thus, supply chain risk management systems (SCRMs) are implemented to identify areas where surges in demand may occur so plans can be accordingly designed( Swierczek and Szozda 2019 ). The overall aim of an SCRM is to ensure that supply chains perform well, with smooth and continuous flows of supplies, and to promote supply chain resilience and robustness. SCRMs should consider all aspects of supply chains and their associated stakeholders, including individuals and organizations, and examine the impact of stakeholders on supply chain resilience. In healthcare supply chains, several strategies can be implemented to mitigate risk and maintain supply-and-demand stability. Inventory can be managed by shifting toward a supply chain that minimizes disruption and leverages technology to manage increasingly complex processes and supplier relationships that require real-time monitoring, such as forming a surplus supply of critical inventory; securing critical assets; using highly accurate forecasting that depends on high-quality information and fast decision making; creating an optimal and standardized fulfillment processes, which will require centralized visibility using an online portal; measuring and monitoring stock consumption using predictive analytics tools; and tracking the trends in orders and usage volumes to support prediction ( Monczka et al., 2015 , Wang et al., 2019 ).

We recommend using a risk management approach to sort multiple suppliers into tiers of revenue impact and suggest using tier-specific tactics, such as continual supply monitoring and buying insurance. Additionally, an express delivery system can be implemented by contracting a third-party source with experience in this field. To ensure functionality during a pandemic or disaster, items can be directly purchased from vendors using cash within one or two days. Collaboration with clinicians and prioritization of patient outcomes are needed, along with decisions about how space is used in provider facilities( Croom 2001 ).

6.7. Using analytical models

Analytical models are other tools that can be used to optimize decision making within supply chain processes. One of the main challenges in ensuring resilience in supply chains is mitigating the ripple effect, which is the propagation of supply chain disruptions that impact the chain’s resilience and performance. At the beginning of the pandemic, several ripple effects were reported due to supplier disruptions in some countries, which then spread downstream in the supply chain, leading to shortages. Several approaches to controlling supply chain resilience have been explored using analytical models such as Bayesian networks, which are powerful analytical tools for risk management and uncertainty assessments. Application of this technique in the supply chain field is relatively new and requires further studies. Bayesian networks can be used to identify causal risk factors associated with supply chain processes; therefore, they can be integrated with machine learning algorithms using big data to overcome many uncertainties and logistical issues( Hosseini and Ivanov 2020 ).

6.8. Future supply chain frameworks

With the future development of new technologies, a hybrid system using the JIT approach may become easier and less costly to implement, and may overcome the limitations of current JIT systems. The system should be able to monitor the average consumption rates of supplies and support projections for future inventory management. Using a barcode system for supplies can provide up-to-date and accurate assessments of stock use and identify any unused inventory( Scanlin 1997 ). Stock can be categorized into different classes according to turnover rate, emergency and urgent use, or price.

A more comprehensive digital supply chain system will be able to estimate use patterns to enable proactive supply management approaches and inform decisions on product distribution. The formation of digital systems will enable a more data-driven supply chain strategy, including data modeling to assess different scenarios. This will allow decision makers to more proactively approach planning for future events( Snowdon and Saunders 2022 ). Another technique that may be used is the integration of a networking system that connects HCOs with their suppliers. This could simplify and increase the accuracy of the ordering process by eliminating the need for intermediaries. This will necessitate the use of comprehensive dashboards that are able to track items from production through shipment to end-user consumption. Data gathered from this dashboard can be used to guide decision making. These technologies will reduce the number of employees required for managing inventory, which in turn will reduce errors and costs. Moreover, monitoring must be performed using a predefined indicator to continuously evaluate the function of the supply chain and benchmark performance against its peers. The system should also be able to identify alternative products and supplies, which would mitigate the effects of any crisis by avoiding dependency on certain pipelines and disruptions related to critical products and services( Kua-Walker 2010 ).

In recent years, HCOs have been moving toward leaner and increased integration strategies in their supply chains. The benefits of this approach are minimized inventory and reduced costs, but this approach poses potential risks( El Baz and Ruel 2021 ). Thus, a trade-off exists between a lean strategy (cost-saving approach) and resilience (robustness), which must be balanced. This is called a “leagile” supply chain, which balances efficiency and resilience through supply chain risk management, taking advantage of both strategies( Ahmed and Huma 2021 ).

In reference of lean process that helps organizations for dealing and managing their supply chain, particularly the critical items, it suggests. First, implementing the lean process in each administrative department. Those departments including warehouse, purchasing, finance, and human resources. Innovation by focusing on quality and productivity with elimination of non-value added activities for each department and section is the cornerstone for implementing the lean process. Then, starting for using map process by considering each steps that are presentation, consultation as in Kiezen Approch, prioritization, Pilot team and methodology application respectively . Second, using such kind of advance system like Med-Approve which can contain all hospitals information with addresses and vendor as well. Each hospital has special code number to use to identify each entity with an icon for meeting agenda to discuss each item for getting approvals as a stock item for all hospitals especially for medical and surgical items. Finally, the benefits of applying lean process is to improve workers performance and the quality with confidence which creates a good environment in each entity ( Monteiro et al., 2015 , Rossiti et al., 2016 ).

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, JIT is a lean methodology that can provide financial and operational benefits. However, caution is needed in specific situations to prevent the breakdown of the system, which would compromise the ability of healthcare systems to deliver care. JIT works properly when the organization has reliable and accurate demand forecasting and works with reliable suppliers, especially if the suppliers use local manufacturers, which considerably impacts the supply chain process. Above all, to be ready for any future emergencies, lessons must be learned from the response to the current COVID-19 pandemic and used to improve overall supply chain systems; HCOs must identify several suppliers and ensure a sustainable stockpile, particularly in areas with many tertiary hospitals. In the future, researchers should evaluate the practicability of the JIT approach by performing evaluations from different perspectives, including costs, efficiencies, benefits, and risks.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

• Ahmed W., Huma S. Impact of lean and agile strategies on supply chain risk management. Total Qual. Manage. Business Excell. 2021; 32 :33–56. [ Google Scholar ]
• Amoako-Gyampah K., Boakye K.G., Adaku E., et al. Supplier relationship management and firm performance in developing economies: a moderated mediation analysis of flexibility capability and ownership structure. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019; 208 :160–170. [ Google Scholar ]
• Andaneswari, A. K. and Q. Rohmadiena, The Disruption of Personal Protection Equipment Supply Chain: What Can We Learn from Global Value Chain in the Time of Covid-19 Outbreak? Global South Review. 2, 171-188.
• Aptel O., Pourjalali H. Improving activities and decreasing costs of logistics in hospitals: a comparison of US and French hospitals. Int. J. Account. 2001; 36 :65–90. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baum N. Just in time’means more dimes in your pocket: Stocking only what your practice needs takes careful planning, but offers big savings. The Bottom Line) Urol. Times. 2006; 34 :28. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brandon-Jones E., Squire B., Autry C.W., et al. A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. J. Supply Chain Manage. 2014; 50 :55–73. [ Google Scholar ]
• Branson R., Dichter J.R., Feldman H., Devereaux A., Dries D., Benditt J., Hossain T., Ghazipura M., King M., Baldisseri M., Christian M.D. The US strategic national stockpile ventilators in coronavirus disease 2019: a comparison of functionality and analysis regarding the emergency purchase of 200,000 devices. Chest. 2021; 2 :634–652. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Canel C., Rosen D., Anderson E.A. Industrial Management & Data Systems; 2000. Just-in-time is not just for manufacturing: a service perspective. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cheng T., Podolsky S. Springer Science & Business Media; 1996. Just-in-time manufacturing: an introduction. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chopra S., Sodhi M. Supply-chain breakdown. MIT. Sloan Manage. Rev. 2004; 46 :53–61. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chowdhury P., Paul S.K., Kaisar S., et al. COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: a systematic review. Transport. Res. Part E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 2021; 148 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chunning, Z. and A. Kumar, 2000. JIT application: process-oriented supply chain management in a health care system. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000.'Management in the 21st Century'(Cat. No. 00EX457), IEEE.
• Coslett, B. G., 2022. Just-In-Time/Just-In-Case Inventory Management as an Influence on Supply Chain Disruption in Medical Systems Based in the Southeastern United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
• Croom S. Restructuring supply chains through information channel innovation. Int. J. Operat. Prod. Manage. 2001 [ Google Scholar ]
• Dash R., McMurtrey M., Rebman C., et al. Application of artificial intelligence in automation of supply chain management. J. Strategic Innov. Sustain. 2019; 14 :43–53. [ Google Scholar ]
• De Vries J. The shaping of inventory systems in health services: a stakeholder analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011; 133 :60–69. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dennision R., Kathawala Y., Elmuti D. Just-in-time: Implications for the hospital industry. J. Hospital Market. 1994; 8 :131–142. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Doughty, H., F. Chowdhury, N. B. T. C. E. P. W. Group, et al., 2020. Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams. Transfusion Medicine. 30, 177-185. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
• Dwivedi S., Kothiyal P. Inventory management: A tool of identifying items that need greater attention for control. Pharma Innov. 2012; 1 :125. [ Google Scholar ]
• El Baz J., Ruel S. Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021; 233 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ezzahra, S. F., A. Ahmed and R. Said, 2018. Literature review on successful JIT implementation in developing countries: obstacles and critical success factors. 2018 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA), IEEE.
• Gerberding, J., 2020. The Role of the Strategic National Stockpile in Pandemic Response.
• Gereffi G. What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? the case of medical supplies. J. Int. Business Policy. 2020; 3 :287–301. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gurtu A., Johny J. Supply chain risk management: literature review. Risks. 2021; 9 :16. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hosseini S., Ivanov D. Bayesian networks for supply chain risk, resilience and ripple effect analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020; 161 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Huang, C. and H. Varmus, 2021. The Strategic National Stockpile during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons and Recommendations.
• Jackson, T. L., 2017. Just-in-time for Healthcare, Productivity Press.
• Karkowski T.A., Karkowska D., Skoczylas P. Just-in-time method in the management of hospital medication stock. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. 2017; 18 [ Google Scholar ]
• Kaswan M.S., Rathi R., Singh M. Just in time elements extraction and prioritization for health care unit using decision making approach. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 2019 [ Google Scholar ]
• Kelle P., Woosley J., Schneider H. Pharmaceutical supply chain specifics and inventory solutions for a hospital case. Operat. Res. Health Care. 2012; 1 :54–63. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kerr D., Houghton L. Just in time or just in case: a case study on the impact of context in ERP implementations. Australasian J. Information Syst. 2010; 16 :5–16. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kester L., Kirschner P.A., van Merriënboer J.J., et al. Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2001; 17 :373–391. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim G.C., Rifai A.K. Efficient approach to health care industry material resource management: an empirical research. Hospital Mater. Manage. Quarter. 1992; 13 :10–24. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kua-Walker, Y. A., 2010. Can a just-in-time inventory system help reduce costs and increase productivity in hospitals?
• Lai K.-H., Cheng T.E. Routledge; 2016. Just-in-time logistics. [ Google Scholar ]
• Leaven L., Ahmmad K., Peebles D. Inventory management applications for healthcare supply chains. Int. J. Supply Chain Manage. 2017; 6 :1–7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee S.M., Lee D., Schniederjans M.J. Supply chain innovation and organizational performance in the healthcare industry. Int. J. Operat. Prod. Manage. 2011 [ Google Scholar ]
• Leite H., Lindsay C., Kumar M. COVID-19 outbreak: implications on healthcare operations. TQM J. 2020 [ Google Scholar ]
• Li, J., 2015. Just-in-Time Management in healthcare operations.
• Mathur B., Gupta S., Meena M.L., et al. Healthcare supply chain management: literature review and some issues. J. Adv. Manage. Res. 2018 [ Google Scholar ]
• Monczka R.M., Handfield R.B., Giunipero L.C., et al. Cengage Learning; 2015. Purchasing and supply chain management. [ Google Scholar ]
• Monteiro M.F., Pacheco C.C., Dinis-Carvalho J., et al. Implementing lean office: a successful case in public sector. FME Trans. 2015; 43 :303–310. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moons K., Waeyenbergh G., Pintelon L. Measuring the logistics performance of internal hospital supply chains–a literature study. Omega. 2019; 82 :205–217. [ Google Scholar ]
• NAVIGANT, 2018. Hospitals’ Supply Chain Savings Opportunity Increases to $25.4 Billion a Year. NAVIGANT SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS.
• Neil R. The ups and downs of inventory management. Mater. Manage. Health Care. 2004; 13 :22–26. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Okeagu C.N., Reed D.S., Sun L., et al. Principles of supply chain management in the time of crisis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2021; 35 :369–376. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Peng H., Pang T. A mutual-aid mechanism for supply chains with capital constraints. Int. J. Manage. Sci. Eng. Manage. 2019; 14 :304–312. [ Google Scholar ]
• Raj A., Mukherjee A.A., de Sousa Jabbour A.B.L., et al. Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned. J. Business Res. 2022; 142 :1125–1139. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rossiti, I., S. M. Serra and I. A. Lorenzon, 2016. Impacts of lean office applications in the supply sector of a construction company. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction.
• Rule T.A. Toward a more strategic national stockpile. Tex. A&M L. Rev. 2021; 9 :49. [ Google Scholar ]
• Scanlin T. A case for'just in time:'could it be right for your hospital, too? J. Healthcare Resour. Manage. 1997; 15 :10–14. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Siddiqui A. The importance of just in time JIT methodology and its advantages in health care quality management business –A scoping review. Biomed. J. Scient. Tech. Res. 2022; 42 :33317–33325. [ Google Scholar ]
• Snowdon A.W., Saunders M.J. Healthcare Management Forum, SAGE Publications Sage CA; Los Angeles, CA: 2022. Supply chain integration as a strategy to strengthen pandemic responsiveness in Nova Scotia. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Swierczek A., Szozda N. An International Journal; Supply Chain Management: 2019. Demand planning as a tamer and trigger of operational risk disruptions: evidence from the European supply chains. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang R., Yu C., Wang J. Construction of supply chain financial risk management mode based on Internet of Things. IEEE Access. 2019; 7 :110323–110332. [ Google Scholar ]