tok essay titles may 2024 reddit

EXPLAINED: May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles

What happened to this post? HackIB has been acquired by MyIBTutor . All content is now available on the MyIBTutor Blog with more exciting IB content to come! Click here to see it for yourself!

Looking for November 2024 Session TOK Essay titles? Click here.

TOK Essay Titles – May 2024 Examination Session

The titles for May 2024 are released! Here they are below:

Make sure to bookmark this page as I explain and provide examples for each of these titles in depth! UPDATE: Title 1, 2, 5 and 6 are now available. Stay tuned for more! For general guidance on how to write a good TOK essay, check out my TOK Essay advice collection .

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

This title attempts to challenge students on the main school of thought that you learn over the TOK course. The gist of your TOK teaching on both of these AOKs probably boiled down to something like: everything is art and it’s just whatever the artist wants to create, while history is always biased because the winners always write all of history. However, this eliminates much of the nuance in each of these AOKs that are worth exploring. That’s what makes this prompt interesting.

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts? I will be honest, I never thought we really ‘celebrated’ subjectivity. It just, was. Inherently, art is a subjective exercise – you can think about this point a little further. You will find some heated discussion on whether art is subjective or could it be objective on the internet and I won’t delve into that here, because it isn’t the point of this title. The key here is to focus on the EXTENT of subjectivity and is it to the detriment of the area of knowledge itself. Then, we have to consider, whose subjectivity are we talking about: is it the artist’s subjectivity, or the audience’s subjectivity. For example, the Mona Lisa wasn’t that well known when it was first painted. I’m sure the Da Vinci thought it was quite a nice piece, but it seems like we didn’t really celebrate his subjectivity. It wasn’t until a certain audience found it subjectively good, that we accepted it as one of the greatest pieces of art in the world! That is an example of how subjectivity is relevant in the dissemination of artistic knowledge. For a more modern example, what about your favourite YouTuber? Do they truly make what they want? NO! They are often beholden to sponsors, and you – the audience! What you want to see, is what they will make! So it is YOUR subjectivity that drives their decision to produce art, not necessarily purely their subjectivity. Subjectivity by definition is just a person’s opinions, emotions, thoughts. This connects well with the TOK concept of values. What VALUES and WHOSE values are determining what art is created (in a variety of contexts), how art is perceived, and how art changes in its reception over time? These are all good questions to ponder. For more unconventional examples about art, think about how museums choose what art to display, what constitutes good art for prizes like the Nobel Prize for Literature, or why some art is considered more expensive than others? Are there systematic ways to think about our subjectivity and how we apply it to art? Is it really overly celebrating subjectivity or simply a necessity to make sense of the abundance of artistic knowledge in a sea of information today?

History gets a bad rep in the TOK classroom. Students like to trash on History calling it biased and unreliable. In this prompt, I don’t want you to refute these claims, but just think about how they aren’t necessarily catastrophic as we might think. We aren’t denying that biases in history could be problematic. I would be suspicious too, if the only accounts of the Rohingya Genocide came from the Myanmar military. However, the word condemned in the title suggests that we might be too harsh on historians when they get things wrong. We should focus on how the historical method recovers itself from failures in biases from its sources. Yes, it might be biased, but is it better than no history? Furthermore, does subjectivity actually ADD value to the way we produce, and interpret historical knowledge? While I’m sure a completely objective, news story like report of what happened in 1886 would be a historian’s dream, that isn’t the case! No matter how objective we try to be, we colour the events we experience by our own opinions, feelings and emotions. But isn’t that history in itself? In an almost cliched way, history’s subjectivity tells us more about what happened in the past and their beliefs and values more than words could ever say.

In both the historical and artistic discussions, you should focus more on the methodologies of these AOKs and how they achieve their AOK’s purpose. Subjectivity manifests in different ways in these AOKs and their methodology reflects that. In the overt awareness of subjectivity in the Arts, its method to produce knowledge is characteristically defined by subjectivity. In History, the method is to identify the covert influences of subjectivity, then to produce the most truthful knowledge possible. You can see that the goals of these two are different, and hence they deal with subjectivity differently. Don’t fall in the trap of focusing your discussion too much on your examples, but generalise to the patterns of how subjectivity manifest in your AOKs and whether their treatment of it is problematic.

It is crucial, when writing the essay for this prompt, to clearly define in your introduction what specialisation and generalisation means. DO NOT use the dictionary definitions here – since this is a TOK Essay, you want to make a TOK version of specialisation and generalisation, in terms of how these two things differ in the production of knowledge. Clearly defining the two in this way will form a solid foundation for you to have a nuanced discussion on this process of reconciliation between the two. The prompt hints at the competing demands on knowledge of specialisation and generalisation – i.e. you might not be able to produce knowledge in the same way if you were aiming for specialisation versus generalisation. So, this provides a point of contrast for you to choose examples and frame your discussion. Remember, the idea of competing demands is an ASSUMPTION, not an argument posed by the question. You should focus on how your chosen examples demonstrate a way to balance the interests of both and reach a ‘middle-ground’ rather than arguing that specialisation or generalisation are compatible with each other. TLDR: Don’t challenge the assumption.

For the first AOK of Mathematics, you should have encountered many personal examples just from your study of IB Maths. Most of your learning has been on generalisation, and the application of such generalisations. For instance, you learn about Calculus, a general topic within Mathematics, and then apply it in various contexts. Mathematicians love generalisations – that Calculus you learned? Well, the definition of a derivative generalised for all functions could be summarised by the first principles of derivatives function that HL AA students learn. You would have less interaction with specialisation of Mathematical knowledge. In a broader sense, the specific components of mathematics, cannot be separated from the general. You can’t solve calculus problems without the fundamental theorem of calculus. However, you could argue that the fundamental theorem of calculus didn’t need calculus problems to exist. Thus, an interesting dilemma arises in Mathematics – the generalisation could be produced, without a particular need for specialisation, but specialisation often calls for generalisation to first exist.

Looking at the latest mathematics research, you will find that applied mathematics is most common. Rarely do you see people get excited by new discoveries of solutions to elliptical curves, but more do when you tell them a new mathematical model to improve our prediction of the weather. We may place greater value on specialisation of knowledge, because we could see its usefulness more immediately, but, the Area of Knowledge does not require such specialisation to produce knowledge. So, do we encourage people to produce knowledge with the goal of specialisation in mind, or do we tell them to produce whatever theoretical generalised mathematical knowledge they can? Look to how mathematics is applied to Quantitative Finance, Econometrics, and Actuarial Science. They specialise mathematical knowledge and provide for some of the most lucrative careers. Does that speak to our preference and demand for specialised knowledge? But then again, what of the interdependence between generalisation and specialisation? How do we balance the two and how does the methodologies of the AOK contribute to this balancing act?

For the second, complimentary AOK, you could have discussions with all of the AOKs. For the Sciences, you could present a similar argument about needing to have some general theories before you could specialise. The scientific method is essentially one big generalisation process – you take specific observations and you make inferences so that you can generalise about some natural process. However, the knowledge that produces need not be general, it can still be specific. If we take specialisation as the goal, then we could pose narrow hypotheses to test. If we take generalisation as the goal, then we might need multiple of these narrow hypotheses to form a full picture, testing each individual case. Thus, specialisation could lead to specialisation alone, but more often, generalisation is the result of many specialisations.

One last question you might want to consider and attempt to answer in your essay is, do you want to know something about everything or everything about something? The answer to that will depend on your AOK. While we want to know about everything on everything, that is simply not reality. So, what trade offs do we make in each AOK, and how does each AOK decide on what we need to know more on?

You might be able to appreciate how long it takes ideas to actually be implemented in reality by looking at the recent Nobel Prize winners for Economic Sciences. The winner of the 2017 prize was Richard H. Thaler, for his contributions to behavioural economics. He explored the impacts of limited rationality, social preferences and the lack of individual self-control on economic decision making on an individual and market level. He started these findings from the 1980s, but it is only recently, in the 2022 revision of the IB syllabus that Economics students learn about the field of Behavioural economics in any detail! So why is it so?

To some extent, it is hard to criticise things for moving slowly. After all, new discoveries like behavioural economics represents a fundamental paradigm shift towards the way research is conducted in the particular AOK. Often times, fresh ideas are left to “ferment” so that their truthfulness can be tested with time. Nothing is more embarrassing than going down a rabbit hole only to find that your assumptions turned out to be monumentally incorrect. Even if we are making a big shift in light of new ideas towards the way we produce knowledge, doing so takes time! For many years and still now, we rely on strong assumptions of rationality to make economic models function. While the psychology of such behaviours are well researched, applying them to an Economic setting may not be. That is to say, it is important to consider how these new ideas arise, and what effect it has on existing knowledge, and the way we produce future knowledge. New ideas is simply new knowledge, but with the added implication that it has some effect on the existing knowledge within an AOK. It could potentially change how we view current knowledge, or how we conduct research given a particular discovery.

In the AOK of the human sciences, which broadly follows the scientific method, you could drawn some inspiration from the philosopher Thomas Kuhn’s view of scientific progress. He argues that within a period of “normal science” where we make incremental progress under the assumption of an overarching model, but there comes a point where we notice accumulation of imperfections with such a model that leads to new paradigms – new ideas, that fundamentally change how we do science. Then we undergo a sort of scientific revolution, where there are debates and decisions made over what sort of model we need to follow, until everyone eventually accepts the new paradigm and returns to a normal science period so that continual small improvements are made to knowledge, until another paradigm shift happens again. While you are not expected to demonstrate such strong philosophy knowledge within the TOK Essay, it is helpful to consider how each AOK handles such ‘revolutions’. For instance, it is harder to irrefutably find falsities in human sciences given the difficulty in replicability and corroborative studies compared to natural sciences.

As for complimentary AOKs, any would suit here, as each AOK has a very different way to handle new ideas. Many factors influence the way new ideas is accepted. For this title, we need to take the assumption that their acceptance is slow, not argue with it. Instead, you should consider what factors influence this slowness, and how different AOKs have different factors in mind when deciding how to accept new ideas. This relates to the nature of the AOK (what is its purpose) and the methodology guiding knowledge production in them.

Have you ever said something that sounds very weird out of context? That might have just been something silly with no real consequences, but in the realm of knowledge, we need to be careful about the consequences of knowledge taken out of their original context. This article highlights how the context of medical treatment matters a lot! As you can imagine, something that works in one field, doesn’t always apply in a straightforward manner to another. This is why there are whole research teams dedicated to what we call “translational research”. That is, trying to “translate” what you get from something like a lab setting, into actual products, like life-saving medications.

The obvious links to AOKs here are the Natural and Human Sciences. For Natural Sciences, we often start off knowledge production in a lab setting, or in a controlled environment. However, the application of such knowledge is rarely as controlled! So an interesting point to consider is how natural scientists have to account for the fact that their findings won’t ever be used in as perfect a setting as their research. Sure, you might have developed bullet proof wood , but how is that going to work in practically when it comes to mass manufacturing it for the army or the police? This is one of the biggest challenges that natural scientists face. It’s not that we aren’t trying to produce exciting knowledge, but that the application of such knowledge in a practical and appreciable context is often very difficult. Something like the mRNA technology (which recently was awarded a Nobel) took a long time to be developed into actual vaccines. The question then is, do we underestimate this process? Often it depends on the goal of the scientist. If the knowledge producer set out with an idea to commercialise in mind, then they would often consider the practical implications of findings. However, people studying theoretical physics for example, would struggle to immediately find very accessible real life implications. That doesn’t mean the knowledge is worthless, but certainly, the challenges are there.

What about non-scientific disciplines? Recently, I went to an art exhibition that trend Van Gough’s paintings into a 3D digital display. There was a Banksy exhibition that took the original murals he painted on the street, into this museum environment. Does changing the context of how art work is shown, and the manipulation of artistic knowledge change its meaning? What is the goal of transforming art into a different context? There are many reasons. Sometimes, it is to create satire (have a look at the parodies of the Mona Lisa), bringing old art onto a new audience (like VR exhibitions of Da Vinci), or simply making it more accessible to people (by making art works digitally available). The producers of these adapted forms of knowledge take great care in considering how this impacts the meaning of the art in its changed form. When artwork is so subjective, the context of art is often required to understand the artist’s meaning and intention, to ‘interpret’ works accordingly. At the same time, as we know art is quite subjective, is a ‘correct interpretation’ always required? If we are to remain artistic purists, then many of the joys of art could be lost! Imagine if you were admonished for listening to Taylor Swift through Spotify on your AirPods because it isn’t the original uncompressed music file with all the details, and you aren’t listening to it on the exact set of thousand dollar speakers it was created with? It would be ludicrous to assume that artistic knowledge is always going to be disseminated in the same context. Thus, this must be a consideration of artists. Is this consideration more or less difficult for different types of art? How is this consideration different to science considering there is no ‘right’ answer to interpreting art?

When thinking about this title, we aren’t arguing whether it is difficult. I think we all agree it is. However, it is about whether we underestimate just how difficult it is! Center your focus on how each AOK’s methodology highlights the consideration of being able to change contexts, and whether that affects the interpretation of the knowledge in question.

The term ‘custodians of knowledge’ is not something TOK students have likely heard of before, but this concept is relatively simple to understand. If you think positively about it, it could be protectors of knowledge, people who preserve knowledge, keeping it for generations to come – for example, some people might consider the Indigenous Peoples’ in Australia to be custodians of their unique cultural knowledge and what they call dreamtime stories. In this way, they keep culture alive, even if most people nowadays speak English and don’t readily tell their history. However, thought about negatively, it could also mean “gatekeepers’ (pardon the Gen Z language) of knowledge. The idealogical “protection” of knowledge could also be seen as a way to prevent some forms of knowledge from becoming knowledge in the first place. Talk to any university academic, and they will tell you how many times their research papers have been rejected. That’s why there is a bias towards statistically significant results, while research that showed that nothing significant has happened doesn’t often get published. Thus, these two contrasts provide for interesting discussion, particularly when considering how each AOK has different forms of custodians of knowledge and how they “gatekeep” or “protect” knowledge in different ways.

Take the AOK of the arts as an example. The career of artists are laughed upon because it is so hard to “break in” to the fine world of art. Many artists aren’t acclaimed until they are long dead. Perhaps most famously, the Mona Lisa wasn’t very well known until several hundred years after it was made. Thus, artists are often at the mercy of custodians of artistic knowledge like art curators and critics, who decide what merits acknowledgement as knowledge. After all, knowledge is only knowledge when there is consensus it is. And if the big wigs in the art industry doesn’t think it’s worth a mention, your art, however brilliant it seems to you, would not reach the consensus required to be considered knowledge. Of course, there are debates on the necessity of custodians in such a subjective AOK. After all, there were many times I questioned how some “artworks” even made it into the modern art museum when it’s literally splashes of paint on a canvas. I digress. However, there is something to be said about maintaining some form of standard to art. We judge whether some art is good or bad, but not in a very rigorous way. Custodians of knowledge supposedly have a framework to make such judgement in a way which preserves the nature of the AOK, and the knowledge within it. Therefore, discussion about the necessity of the custodians should focus on how they contribute to the purpose of the AOK, and whether it is compatible with the nature and methodologies of the AOK.

To further illustrate what I mean, you could see that Natural Sciences might present a stronger argument to the necessity of such custodians. We implicitly “trust” science, for better or for worse, because we know that there is a level of credibility imbued by the scientific method. It is the custodians’ role to maintain the standard of adherence to the scientific method that keeps this credibility alive. This is why, when flat earthers argue that they can’t see the curvature of the earth from the horizon, that it doesn’t get published in a scientific journal as fact! This is why, when research emerges that denies the existence of climate change, custodians have a responsibility to retract such research . However, at the same time, it also places much pressure on producers of such knowledge to create something worthy in the eyes of custodians. You might have heard of the data manipulation scandal that forced Stanford’s president to resign. Thus, custodians do appear quite important in this AOK, when we value the truthfulness of knowledge so much, but that isn’t without its consequences.

I recommend picking two contrasting AOKs that value much different things when writing the essay. While comparison is not a requirement for the essay, it gives you a more nuanced understanding of the question and thus a more reflective piece. For instance, we have just demonstrated that art is relatively subjective, while the sciences are less so. Thus, this influences the role which custodians need to play in each AOK.

The framework to answering this title for many students will follow a similar structure: an example of when novel evidence was accepted and had groundbreaking impacts, and another example where such evidence was problematic and disputed. Repeat this for the second AOK you choose and you’ll have 4 contrasting examples. This is not the only way to approach this title, but is my personal preference considering the structure I suggest to most students that ensures firstly, you will pass the basic criteria of a TOK Essay, and secondly, you will have a strong foundation to succeed. However, since everyone will have a similar style and collection of examples, it is even more important for this title, that you tease out the meaning and the effect on each area of knowledge, and knowledge in general, that your examples represent.

To demonstrate what I mean, let’s focus on two natural sciences examples. First, consider the case of “Cold Fusion”, a theory that you could supposedly have nuclear fusion at room temperature, discovered and subsequently debunked in 1989. A contrasting example, could be recent Nobel Prize winner of Medicine and Physiology, for the research on mRNA vaccines. Immediately, it is obvious that one shows where recent evidence isn’t the strongest, while the latter shows that it could be. But the focus should be on are we TOO QUICK in assuming so, not whether we should or not. Well, what are the reactions and timelines for each example? While Cold Fusion was met with excitement from the general public for the potential it holds for energy production, I wouldn’t say we ‘assumed’ it to be strong. Looking at the news reports from that time, you can see that there was great anticipation about the discovery, leading to lots of sudden funding and interest to investigate it and replicate it. As for mRNA, that discovery took a long time! First the technology, and the getting it to not appear foreign to the human body was very tricky. Even after it was discovered, we waited quite a while, with many people’s first experience with mRNA to be their COVID 19 vaccine. What you need to draw from these two examples is the methodological similarities and differences which reflect the NATURE of Science, and thus, the purpose of science. You see in both how there is an emphasis on replication which corroborates or falsifies, and only after doing so for a long time do we accept it to be true, otherwise it is debunked. So yes, there are moments where Natural Sciences provides strong compelling evidence that ends up false, there are many hurdles with in the methodology of the Natural Science that prevents us from being TOO QUICK to assume it to be true.

For this prompt, it is too easy to fall into the debate of why something was true or why something was false and tricked the population. This is not the point of the essay. You should avoid talking about the specifics of your examples at length. You need to demonstrate how your examples reflect the wider methodologies of the Natural Sciences (and similarly, for your second AOK) that either encourages or discourages our assumptions that novel evidence is always best. As you can see from my examples above, I focused on how such assumption does not happen too quickly because there are many ways we verify scientific knowledge to be true. I don’t discuss the specifics of the actual science behind Cold Fusion or mRNA as that isn’t required. You are better off focusing on the methodologies behind the AOKs themselves and answering the question.

Some interesting complements to the Natural Science AOK could be History (particularly focusing on revisionism and how historical events could be interpreted differently over time), Mathematics (how could the methodologies differ and are there ‘mistakes’ in Maths), or even Human Sciences (replication is a bit more difficult with that!).

Share this:

20 responses to “explained: may 2024 tok essay prescribed titles”.

Hi, when will you deconstruct #6? Much appreciated.

I just did! Hope it helps.

Thank you so much!

hello! when will you deconstruct #2? would really really appreciate it !!!

Just posted!

Hi when will you deconstruct No. 5? Much appreciated.

Could you please deconstruct no5. ?

Check it out!

Please Please deconstruct 5 ASAP, first draft due in 5 days!!!! Thanks!

I just did! It’s a very interesting title.

Hi, when will you deconstruct #3? Much appreciated.

I have just posted this. Thanks!

Hi, when will you deconstruct #4? Thanks!

Just updated!

Hi, is there more in depth analysis of title 4 coming?

Sorry it took a while, but it’s here now!

I have a question, for PT3, so what will be our possible counterclaim? is it another factor that will make it slow? or find another RLS that show sometimes fresh ideas can be adopted fast ?

I would reread the prescribe title. The title is asking you “why”. So all you need to do is propose different sorts of reasons as to why this slowness occurs. You don’t need to challenge the assumption within the title that it is slow. Accept that it is slow, and propose various ideas for why that is the case according to the properties of your chosen AOK.

Could you explain how you would format number One. Would I only be talking about two examples one for each AOK and what about them? Introduction, aok 1 and aok2 and conclusions

For sure! You should refer to my article on structuring for TOK Essay for more details. In general though, you can approach this prompt with two examples for each AOK, with one example about subjectivity being overly celebrated, and one not in the arts, while for history, it would be one where it is condemned unfairly vs not.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

• [email protected]

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles Guide. Short Descriptions & Writing Tips

Hello, IB scholars! As someone deeply immersed in the International Baccalaureate (IB) world for years, I’m thrilled to share my insights on the May 2024 TOK essay titles. Understanding these complex topics can be daunting, but fear not! I’m here to guide you through each one, offering my seasoned perspective on approaching them effectively.

What Are TOK Essay Prescribed Titles?

As an experienced IB writer and advisor, I’ve guided numerous students through the intricate world of the IB Theory of Knowledge essays. In my years of involvement, I’ve understood the essence of TOK essay titles and their significance in the IB curriculum.

TOK essay titles are a unique set of essay questions the IB organization releases annually. They are designed to challenge students to reflect critically on the nature of knowledge and how we come to know what we claim to know. So, each title poses a unique question that encourages deep thinking. As you contemplate your TOK essay, consider these key elements:

• Clarity of Understanding . Ensure you fully comprehend the nuances of the prescribed title.
• Select AOKs and WOKs . Choose relevant Areas of Knowledge and Ways of Knowing that align with the title.
• Real-Life Examples . Include practical situations to illustrate your arguments vividly.
• Critical Thinking . Analyze and evaluate your examples and arguments from multiple perspectives.
• Personal Insight . Reflect on your views and experiences concerning the title.

After choosing your focus, it’s time to structure your essay. A well-organized essay presents your ideas clearly and demonstrates your ability to think logically and coherently. Also, remember about word count . Start with an introduction outlining your understanding of the title and thesis. In the body, develop your arguments systematically, using your chosen AOKs and WOKs. Each paragraph should present a unique point supported by real-life examples and critical analysis.

Concluding your essay is just as important. An excellent conclusion summarizes your key points and reflects your argument’s broader implications. It’s a chance to leave a lasting impression on your reader, showing how your research contributes to a deeper understanding of knowledge.

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles: Detailed Breakdown

The May 2024 TOK essay titles cover intriguing and challenging topics that encourage critical thinking and deep analysis of knowledge:

• Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the Arts and History.
• How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to Mathematics and one other Area of Knowledge.
• Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the Human Sciences and one other Area of Knowledge.
• Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two Areas of Knowledge.
• Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two Areas of Knowledge.
• Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the Natural Sciences and one other Area of Knowledge.

For a successful TOK essay, it’s essential to blend personal insights with academic viewpoints, create a clear and cohesive argument, and effectively address counterarguments. Remember, it is about presenting facts, researching, and reflecting on the nature of knowledge and key TOK concepts . Take this opportunity to engage critically and creatively with the topics. Now, I will guide you through each title and offer my perspective on addressing them.

🎓✍️ Get Top Marks on Your TOK Essay with Our Professional Writing Service! ✍️🎓 Are you struggling with your Theory of Knowledge essay? Look no further than our expert writing service! Our experienced writers have a deep understanding of the TOK criteria and have helped countless students achieve top grades on their essays. 🌟 We guarantee a unique and personalized approach to your TOK essay, and our writers are all human, ensuring that your essay will not be generated by a machine like CHAT-GPT. Additionally, our service is 100% confidential and risk-free, so you can trust us with your academic success. Don't let a poor TOK essay hold you back from achieving your full potential! Contact our team today and let us help you reach new heights in your academic journey. Get started with our TOK Essay Writing Service now! 💡📚🔝

You might be interested:

• How to Write a TOK Journal Assignment: The Complete Guide
• ToK Journal Writing Tips: A Comprehensive Guide
• TOK Exhibition Word Count: A Quick and Convenient Guide
• How to Write TOK Essay in One Week?
• AOKs in IB TOK: Mastering the Easiest and Hardest Areas
• Unpacking the Aims of a TOK Journal: A Guide to Enhance Your Thinking
• IB TOK Essay Structure in Detail
• How To Structure A Theory Of Knowledge Exhibition

1. Subjectivity in Arts and History

The debate over subjectivity’s role in arts versus history is fascinating. Often, we see a celebration of personal interpretation in the arts, whereas history demands objectivity. But should this be the case? Consider Arts and History as your Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) as you write this essay. For Ways of Knowing (WOKs), Emotion and Reason can provide deep insights. Real-life situations (RLSs) might include the analysis of a historical event or an art movement. My advice? Highlight the contrast in how subjectivity is perceived in these fields. Additionally, reflect on whether this difference is justified due to cultural bias.

2. Specialization vs. Generalization in Knowledge

Balancing the tension between specialization and generalization in knowledge production is a challenge. Mathematics is a perfect example of specialization, while Ethics can represent generalization. Logic and Intuition, as WOKs, play significant roles here. Consider using examples like mathematical theories for specialization and ethical dilemmas for generalization. To write a compelling essay, balance the two sides, providing arguments and examples from both Mathematics and another AOK of your choice.

3. Adoption of New Ideas in Knowledge Areas

Why are some knowledge areas slower to adopt new ideas? It is a question of cultural and academic inertia. Consider using Human Sciences and perhaps Natural Sciences AOK to research this. Imagination and Memory, as WOKs, are crucial in understanding this phenomenon. Use examples like breakthroughs in scientific research or new sociological theories as RLSs. Your essay should examine the resistance to new ideas and hypothesize why this occurs.

4. Knowledge Contextualization Challenges

One of the most underestimated aspects of knowledge is its context. Whether it’s Indigenous Knowledge Systems or Religious Knowledge Systems, the challenges of transferring knowledge to a different context are immense. Ways of Knowing, like Faith and Sense Perception, can be crucial in understanding these challenges. Use examples from different cultural contexts or religious texts to illustrate your points. Your essay should investigate these complexities and offer insights into how context shapes understanding.

5. The Role of Custodians in Knowledge

The question of whether we need custodians to safeguard knowledge is intriguing. Ethics and History can serve as your AOKs here, with Language and Emotion as WOKs. Consider using examples like ethical guidelines in research or preserving historical documents as RLSs. In your essay, debate the necessity of having custodians in knowledge, providing arguments for and against their role.

6. Evaluating Recent Evidence in Knowledge

Finally, the assumption that recent evidence is inherently more substantial is worth examining. Natural Sciences and Arts are suitable AOKs for this discussion. Use Reason and Perception as WOKs, and look at examples like the latest scientific findings or contemporary art trends as your RLSs. It’s essential to question the validity of new evidence compared to established knowledge. Your essay should balance this evaluation, presenting a nuanced view of how we perceive and value new information in different AOKs.

TOK Essay Titles: Common Mistakes to Avoid

With the May 2024 TOK essay titles announced, I want to share some common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring you can write a well-thought-out and engaging paper. Be sure to pay attention to these mistakes.

1. Misunderstanding the Title

A standard error involves failing to understand the essay title fully. Each TOK prompt is intricately designed to provoke deep thinking. Make sure you grasp the nuances of the question and understand its connection to the Areas of Knowledge and Ways of Knowing.

2. Lack of Personal Engagement

While TOK essays require academic rigor, they also demand personal reflection. Students often miss the opportunity to express their perspectives and experiences. Relate the title to your insights, ensuring your essay reflects your unique understanding.

3. Over-Reliance on One Area of Knowledge

Frequently, essays become unbalanced by focusing too heavily on a single AOK. Discussing multiple AOKs where applicable is crucial, showing a broad understanding of how the title applies across different areas.

4. Ignoring Counterarguments

A good TOK essay presents a balanced view. You must acknowledge and investigate counterarguments to strengthen your essay. Demonstrate your ability to consider different perspectives and their implications.

5. Inadequate Structure and Flow

Essays often lose marks due to poor organization. A well-structured TOK essay with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion makes your argument more persuasive and accessible.

6. Insufficient Evidence and Examples

TOK essay without concrete examples lacks depth. Use relevant real-life situations and examples to support your points, making your arguments more compelling.

7. Neglecting the Criteria

The IB provides specific criteria for TOK essays. Familiarize yourself with these guidelines and ensure your TOK essay aligns with them. Pay attention to aspects like knowledge questions, analysis, and implications.

8. Plagiarism and Inaccurate Citations

Originality is key in TOK essays. Avoid plagiarism by properly citing sources and presenting your analysis. TOK is about your interpretation of knowledge, not just repeating others’ ideas.

The Bottom Line

This guide aims to spark your interest and offer a direct path for tackling the TOK essay topics. A remarkable essay achieves its essence by balancing your perspectives with thoroughly researching the Areas of Knowledge and Ways of Knowing. I encourage you to incorporate real-world instances that substantiate your viewpoints.

Above all, take pleasure in the process of dissecting these intricate questions. The experience gained in engaging with TOK is as valuable as the result itself. Also, you can contact our IB TOK Essay Help Service specialists for guidance or assistance. We provide top-quality help in writing TOK essays so that you can focus on what’s essential — studying!

Nick Radlinsky

Nick Radlinsky is a devoted educator, marketing specialist, and management expert with more than 15 years of experience in the education sector. After obtaining his business degree in 2016, Nick embarked on a quest to achieve his PhD, driven by his commitment to enhancing education for students worldwide. His vast experience, starting in 2008, has established him as a reputable authority in the field.

Nick's article, featured in Routledge's " Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe: Development through Internationalization ," highlights his sharp insights and unwavering dedication to advancing the educational landscape. Inspired by his personal motto, "Make education better," Nick's mission is to streamline students' lives and foster efficient learning. His inventive ideas and leadership have contributed to the transformation of numerous educational experiences, distinguishing him as a true innovator in his field.

Visual Arts IA Topics: The Best Topic Ideas

In the vast world of art, the possibilities for your IA topic are nearly limitless. Yet, this abundance of choice can sometimes feel overwhelming. Whether you’re drawn to traditional painting techniques, the avant-garde movements of the 20th century, or the intersection of digital media and art, your chosen topic should ignite a spark of curiosity and passion within you.

Theatre IA Topics: SL and HL Topic Ideas

Choosing the right topic for IA in the IB Theatre course is a crucial step that significantly influences your research process and overall learning experience. Whether in the Standard Level or Higher Level track, selecting your topic requires careful thought and consideration, aiming to balance personal interest with academic rigor. This guide offers a rich array of topic ideas and research questions to spark your creativity and intellectual curiosity in the vast world of theatre.

Music IA Topics for SL and HL Students

When selecting a topic for your IB Music Internal Assessment, both SL and HL students face a unique set of challenges and opportunities. As a seasoned IB educator with years of experience guiding students through this process, I’ve come to recognize the importance of choosing a topic that aligns with the IB criteria and resonates with your musical interests and strengths.

Film IA Topics: SL and HL Topic Ideas

Choosing a topic for your IB Film Internal Assessment (IA) can be exciting and daunting. Whether you’re enrolled in the Standard Level (SL) or Higher Level (HL), the key is to select an option that not only intrigues you but also meets the criteria of the IB Film course. In this article, we dig into a variety of creative and thought-provoking ideas for both SL and HL Film IA topics.

IB Dance IA Topics: SL and HL Ideas

When it comes to the IB Dance Internal Assessment (IA), students face the exciting challenge of exploring a topic that resonates with their interests and meets the academic rigor of the IB curriculum. I’ve seen how choosing the right topic can set the stage for an enriching learning experience. In this article, I’m thrilled to share some engaging topic ideas for both SL and HL students aimed at sparking creativity and intellectual curiosity.

Mathematics: Analysis and Approaches IA Topics

Writing the Internal Assessment (IA) for IB Mathematics: Analysis and Approaches is a crucial step for any IB student, combining challenge and opportunity in equal measure. This article highlights the diverse and intriguing IA topics available to Standard Level (SL) and Higher Level (HL) students, helping them to use their mathematical skills in creative and meaningful ways.

© 2023  I Bstudenthelp.com. This website is owned and operated by Udeepi OU Harju maakond, Tallinn, Lasnamäe linnaosa, Sepapaja tn 6, 15551. Disclaimer : Services we provide are only to assist the buyer like a guideline to complete any kind of writing assignment. Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions Cookie Policy Revision Policy Refund Policy

• Mathematics: AA SL
• Mathematics: AA HL
• Mathematics: AI SL
• Mathematics: AI HL
• Biology SL (FE2025)
• Biology HL (FE2025)
• Biology SL (FE2016)
• Biology HL (FE2016)
• Chemistry SL (FE2025)
• Chemistry HL (FE2025)
• Chemistry SL (FE2016)
• Chemistry HL (FE2016)
• Physics SL (FE2025)
• Physics HL (FE2025)
• Physics SL (FE2016)
• Physics HL (FE2016)
• Business SL (FE2024)
• Business HL (FE2024)
• Business SL (FE2016)
• Business HL (FE2016)
• Economics SL
• Economics HL
• Psychology SL
• Psychology HL
• Computer Science SL
• Computer Science HL
• English A LAL SL
• English A LAL HL

TOK Chronicles: Decoding the TOK Essay Prompts for May 2024

As the May 2024 International Baccalaureate (IB) assessment approaches, students preparing for the Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay are faced with intriguing and thought-provoking prompts. These essay topics delve into the essence of knowledge, challenging students to explore various facets of how we acquire, interpret, and utilize information. In this guide, we will dissect each of the six essay prompts, providing insights and considerations for students embarking on their TOK Essay journey.

1. Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

This prompt challenges students to delve into the intricate relationship between subjectivity and objectivity in the realms of the arts and history. It prompts a sophisticated exploration of the interplay between the two, urging students to consider the celebration of subjectivity in the arts and the potential unfair condemnation of subjectivity in historical narratives. The essay should focus on the methodologies in each discipline, discussing how subjectivity manifests and whether it is a constructive or destructive force in knowledge production.

2. How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

This prompt delves into the tension between specialization and generalization in knowledge production. Students are encouraged to define these terms in a TOK context and discuss how each demand affects the production of knowledge. By referencing mathematics and another AOK, such as literature or natural sciences, students can explore the unique challenges and benefits associated with specialization and generalization and ponder how these demands can be reconciled.

3. Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Addressing the sluggish adoption of fresh ideas in various AOKs, this prompt prompts students to examine the dynamics of knowledge adoption. Focusing on the human sciences and another AOK, students can explore factors influencing the pace of adoption, such as societal acceptance, methodological considerations, and the nature of each discipline. The essay should consider whether the pace of adoption is justified or if there are inherent challenges hindering the assimilation of new ideas.

4. Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

This prompt encourages an exploration of the challenges associated with transferring knowledge across different contexts. By referencing two AOKs, students can discuss the implications of removing knowledge from its original setting and examine how context influences interpretation. The essay should analyze whether the difficulties of transferring knowledge are underestimated and consider the impact of this process on the reliability and validity of the knowledge.

5. Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Exploring the concept of custodianship, this prompt encourages students to evaluate the necessity of individuals or entities safeguarding knowledge. By referencing two contrasting AOKs, students can examine the role of custodians in preserving, disseminating, and potentially limiting knowledge. The essay should delve into the impact of custodianship on the nature and accessibility of knowledge within each AOK.

6. Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Challenging the assumption that the most recent evidence is always the strongest, this prompt prompts students to explore the dynamics of evidence evaluation. Referencing the natural sciences and another AOK, students can analyze how the validity and strength of evidence vary across disciplines. The essay should consider the factors influencing the perceived strength of evidence, such as methodologies, societal expectations, and the nature of the knowledge in question.

As students grapple with these compelling TOK Essay prompts, a journey of critical thinking and exploration unfolds. Each topic invites a unique perspective and challenges students to apply TOK concepts in real-world contexts. By delving into the intricacies of replicability, the explicable and the inexplicable, information bubbles, the relationship between knowledge and power, visual representations, and the impact of methodologies, students embark on a voyage of intellectual discovery integral to the TOK experience.

With Blen, you can test your knowledge and hone your skills with real exam-like questions. Get onboard now and take control of your future!

Start your Free Trial today

Unrestricted access to IBDP questions, key concepts, solutions, performance reports and much more…

*Invite 2 students to subscribe to Blen and unlock FREE Access to IBDP content, assessments, assignments, students’ performance reports. 

Connecting the Dots: TOK Core Theme

Tok chronicles: understand the concept of effective research, tok chronicles: exploring truth, perception, and belief, unveiling the essence of ib diploma programme's tok, how and why ibdp tok is a vital subject, guidelines for crafting claims and counterclaims in your tok essay, a breakdown of the five optional themes in tok, a comprehensive guide on your tok journal.

Blen is a powerful learning and teaching platform, thoughtfully designed for the IBDP community. With 100% IBDP Curriculum aligned resources such as interactive questions, key concepts, adaptive mock tests, assignments and detailed reports, unlock your true IBDP potential.

Be the first to know about our news and special offers direct to your inbox.

I consent to the processing of my personal data, in order to receive news and updates of Blen, according to the " Privacy Statement "

May 2024 TOK Essay Prompts | IB Experts Guide + Examples

Table of contents

• Writing Metier

The TOK essay prescribed titles for May 2024 are now available.  Understanding these TOK essay prompts is essential for IB students aiming for a successful essay. This is why I’m writing this article with expert suggestions from our IB experts for you.

I do not want to spend your precious time with a long introduction, so let me go straight to the point!

May 2024 TOK essay titles list

Here’s a breakdown of each title, offering insights and potential approaches.

• Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?  Discuss with reference to the arts and history.
• How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?  Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.
• Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them?  Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.
• Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context?  Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• Do we need custodians of knowledge?  Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest?  Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Get TOK essay assistance from IB experts

At Writing Metier, we understand the intricacies and challenges of crafting a compelling TOK essay . Our team of seasoned IB experts is here to guide you every step of the way. 

➡️ Buy Custom TOK Essay Online ⬅️

We will provide you with a tailor-made sample TOK essay that aligns seamlessly with your specific instructions, adheres to the TOK essay rubric , and meets the overarching IB criteria. 

Trust in our expertise and let us support you in achieving excellence in your TOK essay writing .

Breakdown of each 2024 May TOK Essay Prompt

Now, let me break each TOK essay title for May 2024 in detail. I’ll also suggest several possible areas of knowledge, ways of knowing and applicable real-life examples to give you some inspiration for these prompts.

Let’s begin!

TITLE 1:   Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

Examine the role of emotion and intuition WOKs in the arts, where personal interpretations often lead to diverse artistic expressions. 

For instance, Picasso’s abstract art is open to multiple interpretations. Contrast this with history, where reason and language WOKs play a pivotal role in documenting events. 

For example, while historians value primary sources for their objectivity, they often criticize biased accounts.

TITLE 2:   How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

In mathematics, specialization might refer to mastering a specific theorem, while generalization involves understanding broader mathematical principles. 

For instance, Pythagoras’ theorem is specialized, but its application in various real-life scenarios , like architecture, is a generalization. Contrast this with the natural sciences, where specialized knowledge might refer to niche research studies, while general knowledge encompasses broader scientific theories.

TITLE 3:   Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

In human sciences, new psychological theories, for instance, undergo rigorous testing and peer reviews before acceptance. This slow adoption ensures reliability. 

Contrast this with ethics, where new moral ideas, like those concerning AI’s rights, face resistance due to cultural and societal values, making their adoption slow.

TITLE 4:   Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

In religious knowledge systems, scriptures taken out of their historical context can lead to misinterpretations. 

For instance, ancient religious texts might not directly apply to modern ethical dilemmas. 

Similarly, in the arts, a piece of art created in a specific cultural context might lose its original meaning when viewed in a different cultural setting.

TITLE 5:   Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

In indigenous knowledge systems, elders often act as custodians, preserving traditions and stories for future generations. Their role ensures that knowledge is not lost over time. 

In contrast, academic journals and institutions act as custodians in the natural sciences, ensuring that scientific knowledge is recorded, peer-reviewed, and accessible for future research.

TITLE 6:   Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

In the natural sciences, newer research, such as recent findings on climate change, might be considered more accurate due to advanced technology and methodologies. However, it’s essential to consider the reliability and validity of these findings. 

In history, newer historical evidence, like a recently discovered manuscript, might shed light on an event, but its authenticity and context must be verified.

Now let me share some samples written by our expert IB writers at Writing Metier.

May 2024 TOK essay samples

Let’s start with the sample of the TOK essay on May 2024 prompt 2 – How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?

If you need a professionally written TOK essay, feel free to ask for help from our IB experts.

If you have missed it, I also have an article about prior TOK essay titles with suggestions and samples. Make sure to check them out as well!

The year 2023:

• November 2023 TOK essay prompts
• May 2023 TOK essay titles

The year 2022:

• November 2022 TOK essay prompts
• May 2022 ToK essay titles

Previous years’ prompts:

• November 2021 ToK Essay titles
• May 2021 Theory of Knowledge essay prompts

With a clear understanding of these TOK titles, IB students are well-prepared to select a topic and begin their essay. 

Keep in mind that the key to a compelling TOK essay is a thorough understanding of the chosen prompt and a structured approach to addressing it.

If you need assistance writing a custom TOK essay , Writing Metier is here to help you out. Contact our support team via email or using a live chat or simply fill out our online order form with details of your IB TOK essay.

➡️ Order an Essay  ⬅️

Free topic suggestions

Vasy kafidoff.

Vasyl Kafidoff is a co-founder and CEO at WritingMetier. He is interested in education and how modern technology makes it more accessible. He wants to bring awareness about new learning possibilities as an educational specialist. When Vasy is not working, he’s found behind a drum kit.

Similar posts

November 2023 tok essay prompts explained + samples.

This article is a complete guide to the November 2023 TOK essay prompts, which includes detailed explanations of each prompt along with samples to help students understand them better. It offers practical advice and expert guidance to help students improve their writing skills and succeed in this important assignment. Whether you need help selecting a topic or want to enhance your critical thinking skills, this article provides valuable insights that will help you craft a successful TOK essay.

IB ToK Essay Prompts for November 2022

Every year, students who started IBDP are waiting for IB to share the list of specific prescribed titles for Theory of Knowledge essays. Like in all the previous years, IB opened a list of six topics for TOK essays for the next semester.

ToK Essay Titles November 2021 | Explained + SAMPLES

In this article, we will be talking about the six Theory of knowledge essay topics students enrolled in the IB diploma need to be aware of. Just like every year, this TOK November’s topics vary in different elements, and in this article, we will share descriptions about each topic which the students need to keep in their minds when selecting the essay topic for their diplomas.

30 Different TOK Presentation Topic Ideas to Succeed in IB

Given that the TOK essay's structure and the presentation are unlike others, students can find it challenging to proceed with it. You can only do well on the TOK presentation if you have an excellent idea.

May 2023 TOK Essay Prompts + SAMPLES and Suggestions

Every year, students anxiously wait for the IB to announce the TOK essay topics. So this year is not an exception; IBO has also announced 2023 May titles for IB TOK essay. In this article, we have provided the list of prompts with short directions and suggestions for each topic. Enjoy reading ;)

TOK Exhibition IA Prompts 2023/2024

The list of TOK exhibition prompts for the years 2023/2024. You can easily get through the TOK exhibition with the right understanding of how to work your way through it. All you need is to select the right TOK exhibition IA prompt and have the proper focus with determination to complete it.

We rely on cookies to give you the best experince on our website. By browsing, you agree to it. Read more

ToK Essay May 24 FAQs

• January 2, 2024
• Student Support , ToK Essay

Introduction to ToK Essay May 24 FAQs

I’ve been receiving many questions about the May 24 Theory of Knowledge (ToK) essays. As such I compiled this blog post to address the most frequently asked questions, provide insights, and offer guidance for students embarking on their ToK essays. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the most common questions, along with my advice.

Q1: Are we allowed to use examples from WW1 or WW2 in the essay ?

A recurring question from students in Europe and the Americas is the appropriateness of using World War I or World War II examples in their essays. The ToK Subject Report of May 23 clarifies that while there’s no explicit restriction from the IB on such examples, they must be relevant and sufficiently justify the point being made. Importantly, examples drawn from personal studies or experiences are highly recommended, as they allow a deeper understanding and better analysis.

Q2: Do I have to use perspectives in my essay ?

The command term ‘Discuss’ requires that you give a critical exploration of various viewpoints. The November 22 ToK Subject Report emphasises evaluating different perspectives, not just stating them. It’s essential to consider and justify multiple points of view in your essay, including your own, provided they are supported by evidence.

Q3: Can I argue the opposite of the Question ?

Can you argue contrary to the prescribed title? Yes, but with a caveat. You must explore a range of viewpoints, including those aligned with the prescribed title. The IB stresses showing awareness of diverse opinions, allowing complete agreement, agreement with reservations, or total disagreement, backed by evaluative reasoning.

Q4: What’s the difference between Counterclaim and Evaluation ?

The distinction between a counterclaim and an evaluation is pertinent to the current ToK curriculum. Previously, essays focused on counterclaims, but now the emphasis is on evaluation points. This approach allows for a more nuanced discussion of both the strengths and weaknesses of a claim.

Q5: Do I have to include examples for every Knowledge Claim ?

This question primarily concerns the essay structure used. Whilst the IB doesn’t prescribe a specific structure, examples are essential for illustrating main claims and significant evaluation points. The key is to use examples effectively and in balance with the essay’s word limit, focusing more on how they illustrate knowledge claims rather than on lengthy descriptions.

Conclusion and Additional Resources

This blog post aims to clarify the most common queries about the ToK Essay for May 24. For more detailed guidance, including essay structures and effective example usage, consider exploring my e-book “How to Write the ToK Essay in 6 Easy Steps”.

For detailed guidance notes on each Prescribed Title in May 24 session click here.

Stay tuned for more FAQs in future posts and feel free to reach out with your questions at [email protected] or through the ToKToday website and Facebook page.

Daniel, Lisbon, Jan 24

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Discover more from toktoday.

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

TOK DISCUSSIONS

Theory of knowledge prescribed titles

May 2024 examination session

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ide as, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to tw o areas of knowledge.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is in evitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

May 2024 Title #1

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?

Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

The short answer is “Yes.”

The celebration of subjectivity, which means accepting and respecting all perspectives on art, has reached an extreme in recent times. Practically anything can be considered art. Any assembled piece can be deemed fine art; even the most mundane existence can transform into performance art. Music, I won’t even begin.

On the other hand, the view on history has become so rigid that it has elevated expectations to the level of the natural sciences. The interpretation of sources and events is an inherent part of reporting history, subject to the interpreter’s perspective, like any interpretation. Moreover, opposing views on a historical event are common, and dismissing them as subjective is an unjust condemnation of subjectivity in historical analysis.

Begin your essay with an introduction. Explain the title in your own words, similar to the explanation above. You can also provide a real-life example from your personal experience where you either excessively celebrated subjectivity or unjustly condemned it to illustrate your grasp of the topic. Perhaps a situation where someone’s opinion excessively influenced you, or where a teacher

or parent rejected alternative viewpoints straight up cold.

Present your arguments and discuss the title using contemporary real-life examples from the world of art and contentious moments in history. Marcel Duchamp propagated the Dadaist art movement, fueling the belief that “anything can be art.” Today, the lyrics that flow from the mouths of the majority of rap artists are regarded as song lyrics, though, in reality, they often consist of nothing but curse words and vulgarity.

Whether ANZAC soldiers were fallen heroes or perceived as defeated intruders, the Gallipoli Campaign indisputably occurred. Objective elements such as dates, casualty figures, and the names of generals, kings, and sultans exist. Meanwhile, intentions and methods of commemorating the event are subjective and should not be condemned.

For more information on these events and additional real-life examples for your essay, check out the “History” and “The Arts” chapters in the book “ Tee-Okay for Dummies .” Also, shake off any worries about composing your TOK essay by studying genuine past papers with high marks in the “ TOK Assessments Ultimate Guide ” book.

May 2024 Title #2

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?

Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

The same way you’re currently balancing the conflicting demands of success in education and life, you understand that merely attending college, studying for a few years, and searching for an entry-level job won’t guarantee wealth or happiness. On the other hand, the vague notion of “pursuing your dreams” could potentially leave you struggling as a jobless, homeless individual.

So, what’s the solution? You’d maintain the balance by pouring from one cup to another. For this title, you already have one AOK (Area of Knowledge), which is mathematics. The second one – you should choose. It can be either of the sciences. Of course, you can find great RLEs (Real-Life Examples) in the arts and history as well, but only if you are an art or history nerd.

In mathematics, there’s a significant demand for specialization in fields like statistics and data science. This specialization involves producing knowledge specific to these fields, advancing them because they are bringing money and power. However, developing such specialized knowledge needs the application of foundational mathematical knowledge. Let’s be clear; we’re not comparing pure and applied mathematics. The relationship is unidirectional – pure mathematics feeds applied mathematics. In this context, the comparison is between specialized fields like those mentioned earlier and more general ones like algebra or trigonometry.

If you choose economics or computer science as your second area of knowledge, you can elegantly demonstrate the connections between these fields. For instance, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) fundamentally relies on linear algebra, a branch of pure mathematics. It’s extensively employed for dimensionality reduction and feature extraction in data science. Data scientists utilize this technique in macroeconomics, risk management, and consumer behavior analysis. Meanwhile, computer scientists employ PCA to advance knowledge in facial recognition, machine learning, and data compression, which ultimately contribute to more advancements in economics, and other fields.

Regardless of your chosen field, seek real-life examples where knowledge is created within that field to advance its own frontiers, as well as its broader applications.

If you are extremely good at math and possess strong analytical abilities and writing skills, consider choosing this title. Otherwise, it might be wiser to select a simpler title that can help you get an A.

To learn more about different fields of math and study additional real-life examples for your essay, check out “Mathematics,” “Natural Sciences,” and “Human Sciences” chapters in the book “ Tee-Okay for Dummies .” Also, shake off any worries about composing your TOK essay by studying genuine past papers with high marks in the “ TOK Assessments Ultimate Guide ” book.

May 2024 Title #3

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them?

Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing may be more exciting than bungee jumping; however, why are people so slow to try it? Many never even think of attempting it. The reasons are that the thrill and excitement may not be worth the risk, it may go against personal beliefs, laws, and regulations, and many do not consider bungee jumping a sport or even entertaining. And, of course, a vast majority of people do not have access (time, money, etc.).

Resistance to change, biases, institutional inertia, peer review and publication challenges, authorities, jealousy, lack of funding, lack of time and patience, cultural and societal factors, communication, and education, among others, can slow down the process of adopting new ideas, especially in the field of human sciences.

In economics, Universal Basic Income (UBI) is a contemporary concept proposing regular, unconditional cash payments to all citizens, regardless of their income or employment status. While it has gained attention as a means to address economic inequality and automation-induced job displacement, UBI faces resistance due to concerns about its cost and feasibility, potential impacts on work incentives, distributional effectiveness, inflationary pressures, and varying levels of political support. Despite the ongoing debates and skepticism, UBI remains a topic of experimentation and research in economics worldwide.

The concept of dark matter represents a contemporary enigma in physics. Proposed to account for unexplained gravitational effects in galaxies and galaxy clusters, dark matter remains contentious due to its elusive nature and the lack of direct detection. Skepticism persists as alternative theories like Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) challenge the need for dark matter, and the complexity of potential dark matter candidates raises doubts. Despite these challenges, dark matter’s presence or absence has profound implications for our understanding of the universe’s structure and evolution, making it a pivotal and enduring subject of exploration and debate in the field of physics.

The advent of Auto-Tune and digital vocal processing represents a modern innovation that has stirred both enthusiasm and skepticism in music. Originally devised as a pitch-correction tool for audio engineers, Auto-Tune took the spotlight when artists creatively employed it to achieve distinct vocal effects, leading to debates about musical authenticity and the potential for technology to overshadow raw talent. Some argue that it has diluted emotional depth and undermined traditional vocal skills, while others see it as a legitimate tool for artistic expression. The ensuing discussions highlight the enduring tension between technological innovation and artistic integrity in the world of music.

I’m sure you can find many more examples of fresh ideas being resisted in your favorite field of knowledge and match them with examples from human sciences.

Discover more of these examples from different areas of knowledge and read their stories in various chapters of the book “ Tee-Okay for Dummies .” Also, shake off any worries about composing your TOK essay by studying genuine past papers with high marks in the “ TOK Assessments Ultimate Guide ” book.

May 2024 Title #4

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context?

Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

When Michael Jordan retired from the game of basketball and moved completely to the business world, he faced many challenges. Building a business had similarities to building a basketball team, maybe in principle; however, the dynamics of the business world are different from sports. He never legally owned the Chicago Bulls, but he certainly owned its successes and failures during his time. These were challenges for him in taking his knowledge out of sports and transferring it to business. But you should pay attention to the fact that the title question does not ask you to merely agree or disagree, or even analyze the challenges of such a transfer. What you are expected to do for your essay is to analyze whether “we” underestimate these challenges, and if we do, how does it affect the outcome. MJ did not underestimate anything, of course.

Sportspeople and artists move to the business world. Entertainers, more specifically YouTubers, challenge themselves to entertain people in sports. Doctors become politicians, and politicians become motivational speakers. When you look closely at individuals who gain fame and success, they usually try to transfer their knowledge from one field to another.

Businesses also do it all the time, and call it diversification. Governments are also sometimes forced to transfer knowledge that is developed in one context to another context, mostly with failure.

It is quite easy to find these transfers in different areas of knowledge. It is also not very hard to find the challenges that “we” face when transferring knowledge from one field of knowledge to another. What is crucial for you to analyze and discuss through real-life examples is how these challenges were underestimated by individuals and organizations.

Entertainers, from the arts, transferring their knowledge to business and politics, from human sciences, are good examples to be analyzed. Companies also diversify into totally new fields, which can provide you with interesting material to analyze. Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Volodymyr Zelensky, Kanye “Ye” West, General Electric (GE), Samsung, 3M, and many more are worthy of being researched.

If you want to be more specific, which I do not recommend, you can analyze the transitions that artists made from one genre of music to another, or actors and directors from comedy to drama.

May 2024 Title #5

Do we need custodians of knowledge?

The cover of the book “Novum Organum” by Francis Bacon shows the pillars of Hercules on each side of the Strait of Gibraltar in the Mediterranean Sea. The pillars are said to have the phrase “ne plus ultra” inscribed on them, which means “Go no further/Nothing lies beyond.” There are also two ships, one leaving and one returning, indicating exploration beyond the known limits of knowledge. At the bottom of the design, an inscription of Biblical origin in Latin says, “multi pertransibunt et augebitur scientia,” which means, “Many will travel, and knowledge will be increased.”

Throughout history, there have always been individuals who take it upon themselves to determine what qualifies as knowledge and what should remain hidden. These self-appointed custodians and gatekeepers often assert control over knowledge distribution as if it were their property, despite the original meaning of “custodian” as someone responsible for protection, a caretaker.

You can explore numerous instances of such control in the “natural sciences” chapter of the book “ Tee-Okay for Dummies .” Alternatively, you can research how scientific publication has evolved into a multi-billion-dollar industry and the resulting implications for knowledge dissemination.

Should any researcher have the right to publish their findings, or should scientific papers undergo peer review by experts in the field? Is there enough time and expertise to review every single paper thoroughly?

In the chapter on “the arts” in the same book, you can explore the world of art critics and connoisseurs who’ve assumed the role of decision-makers in valuing art. Additionally, you can examine how governments often manipulate historical narratives to serve their agendas, a topic explored in “ Tee-Okay for Dummies ,” or conduct your own research for intriguing and eye-opening stories.

Human sciences and mathematics are no exceptions to this pattern.

Regardless of the area of knowledge you choose to explore, it’s important to approach it with an unbiased perspective regarding custodians of knowledge. While assessment bodies are essential for knowledge dissemination, they can sometimes intertwine the process with politics, potentially hindering knowledge development and humanity as a whole. Seek out examples that contrast absolute freedom in sharing knowledge with strict and manipulated custodianship over it.

To draw a contemporary analogy, consider analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of learning from TikTok compared to academic resources. Similarly, evaluate whether it’s more beneficial to obtain unfiltered news from X (formerly known as Twitter) or rely on information filtered through mainstream media.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of having custodians of knowledge?

May 2024 Title #6

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest?

Discuss with reference to the natural sciences  and one other area of knowledge.

Sometimes we are, and sometimes we are not. However, this is not a yes/no question with a straightforward answer. By including “too quick” in the title question, the IB already implies that we tend to accept the most recent evidence as the strongest, and in doing so, we often make mistakes.

What you are expected to do is to explore real-life examples where such rapid acceptance led to scientific, political, or social disasters and analyze “what” went wrong and “why” it happened. I’ll write about the case of COVID-19 that you don’t have to, as examiners are sick of reading about everything related to the pandemic.

Dr. Peter Hotez, the famous face of COVID-19 vaccines, highly recommended that everyone takes the shots, in late 2020, when the first vaccines were released. Later, he claimed that “new evidence” showed that two doses of COVID-19 vaccines were necessary for adults and had long-lasting effects. In 2021, he once again informed the world that “recent cases” indicated that two doses did not hold up well against the virus and encouraged everyone to take a third shot, this time he included children. It appears that he still believes that more vaccine doses are necessary in light of “recent” cases, discoveries, evidence, or studies.

But why did this happen, and how? The widespread fear of the virus made both ordinary citizens and scientists (we) “too quick” to accept all the “recent evidence” that Dr. Hotez claimed to be true. Allegedly, he had political and financial motives to do so. Medical science is not perfect and compels society to “inevitably” accept claims. This phenomenon is not limited to scientific evidence but also extends to crazy claims of alternative medicine and even superstitions.

You can find many examples of such events in the natural sciences, human sciences, and history in their respective chapters in the book “ Tee-Okay for Dummies .” And, of course, you can also discover many more real-life examples in your favorite fields of knowledge by conducting your own research.

In writing your essay on this topic, pay attention to emphasizing who “we” are in your real-life examples and “why” recent evidence was accepted “inevitably,” without any second thoughts or further investigation.

Also, shake off any worries about composing your TOK essay by studying genuine past papers with high marks in the “ TOK Assessments Ultimate Guide ” book.

Be the first to receive Titles Explanations and Tips by subscribing to our newsletter below and read full explanations and study examples and sample texts in the Ultimate Guide .

Theory of knowledge

Theory of knowledge (TOK) is assessed through an exhibition and a 1,600 word essay.

It asks students to reflect on the nature of knowledge, and on how we know what we claim to know.

TOK is part of the International Baccalaureate® (IB) Diploma Programme (DP) core, and is mandatory for all students.

Learn more about theory of knowledge . You can also find examples of TOK essay titles and read about how the IB sets deadlines for TOK .

You may also be interested in the other components of the DP core: creativity, activity, service (CAS) and the extended essay .

Learn more about TOK in a DP workshop for teachers . 

DP subject briefs

Find out about what each subject offers within the Diploma Programme (DP).

Our DP subject briefs—for both standard and higher level—contain information about core requirements, aims and assessment.

• Explore the DP subject briefs

We use cookies on this site. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies.   Read more about cookies

Extended Essay Writers

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles. Short Descriptions & Tips for Writing

Luke MacQuoid

Hello, IB students! As a seasoned IB writer, I’m thrilled to share my insights on the intriguing May 2024 TOK essay titles. Having walked the complex world of Theory of Knowledge, I understand the challenges and excitement that come with these essays. Let’s dig into each title by offering practical strategies and psychological hooks to make your TOK path rewarding and enjoyable.

What Are TOK Essay Titles?

So, Theory of Knowledge essay titles are prompts provided by the International Baccalaureate (IB) Organization for students enrolled in the IB Diploma Programme. These prompts form the basis for the TOK essay, a core component of the IB curriculum. Here’s a bit more about them:

• The TOK essay encourages students to reflect on the nature of knowledge and how we come to know what we claim to know. It’s an exercise in critical thinking and philosophical inquiry designed to challenge students’ understanding of knowledge.
• Typically, the IB provides a list of prescribed titles for each exam session. These titles are carefully formulated questions covering various knowledge, understanding, and belief topics.
• The questions often require students to draw upon different Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) — such as the Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, History, or the Arts — and Ways of Knowing (WOKs) like Language, Emotion, Reason, or Sense Perception. The essay prompts students to analyze and evaluate knowledge claims, considering their validity and the role of perspective.
• In writing the essay, students are expected to engage with the title critically and thoughtfully, often drawing on real-life situations (RLS) or personal experiences to illustrate their points. The essay should demonstrate the student’s ability to think deeply about knowledge and its implications.
• The TOK essay is externally assessed and contributes to the overall score of the IB Diploma. It is evaluated based on criteria that include understanding of knowledge issues, critical thinking, organization and analysis, and clarity of expression.

In essence, the TOK essay titles serve as a starting point for deep and reflective research of how we know what we know, and they play a crucial role in developing critical thinking and analytical skills in IB students. By the way, we have previously reviewed the November 2023 TOK essay titles .

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles: An Overview

Having established a solid foundation, let’s focus on the six engaging TOK essay titles for May 2024. Additionally, our blog offers numerous informative articles. We suggest checking out our piece on the TOK and EE matrix for more valuable insights.

1. Is Subjectivity Overly Celebrated in the Arts but Unfairly Condemned in History?

Discuss with reference to the Arts and History.

In my opinion, the first title probes the intriguing contrast in how we perceive subjectivity in the arts and history. AOKs like Visual Arts or Music and WOKs like Emotion and Imagination come into play for the arts. Conversely, in history, we lean on Reason and Language. A riveting RLS could be the differing interpretations of historical events in movies or paintings. Here’s a tip: balance your essay with examples showing both the necessity and pitfalls of subjectivity in these fields.

2. How Can We Reconcile the Opposing Demands for Specialization and Generalization in the Production of Knowledge?

Discuss with reference to Mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Next, we tackle the delicate balance between specialization and generalization. Particularly, let’s focus on mathematics and other areas like Ethics. Mathematics thrives on specialization – think of the precise nature of algorithms. In Ethics, however, a more generalized approach often prevails. From my experience, a compelling RLS could involve the ethical implications of AI in mathematical problems. My suggestion? Highlight the benefits and drawbacks of both approaches in producing knowledge.

3. Nothing Is More Exciting than Fresh Ideas, So Why Are Areas of Knowledge Often So Slow to Adopt Them?

Discuss with reference to the Human Sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing excites me more than fresh ideas, yet they’re often slow to be adopted. This title invites us to examine this paradox in the human sciences and another area, say, Natural Sciences. Consider the slow acceptance of psychological theories or environmental concerns. As I know it, the key here is to research the resistance and eventual acceptance of new ideas, using specific examples that demonstrate this dynamic.

4. Do We Underestimate the Challenges of Taking Knowledge out of Its Original Context and Transferring It to a Different Context?

Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Now, let’s ponder the underestimated challenges of transferring knowledge across contexts. My advice? Choose two contrasting areas: Ethics and Physics. Discuss how ethical principles might struggle to find relevance in physical theories or vice versa. This title requires a nuanced understanding of the limitations and potentials of knowledge application.

5. Do We Need Custodians of Knowledge?

Do we need custodians of knowledge? This title pushes us to think about who controls knowledge and why. For instance, consider the role of peer review in Natural Sciences and the guardians of historical narratives in History. According to general IB criteria, debating the positive and negative aspects of having knowledge custodians is crucial.

6. Are We Too Quick to Assume That the Most Recent Evidence Is Inevitably the Strongest?

Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Lastly, we question our tendency to favor recent evidence. In areas like Biology and History, this can be particularly prevalent. From my experience, a great RLS could involve new archaeological findings versus established historical narratives. Using solid examples and critical analysis, challenge the assumption that new is always better.

The Best Writing Tips for TOK Essays

Drawing on my extensive experience as an IB writer, I’m here to offer you some insider tips for writing a successful Theory of Knowledge essay. The essence of an excellent paper lies in the fusion of critical thinking, deep personal reflection, and solid academic argumentation. Let’s look at some strategies for improving your writing.

Personal Insight and Scholarly Perspectives

In my opinion, the most compelling TOK essays are those that masterfully blend personal insights with academic viewpoints. This balancing act is not always straightforward but achievable with the right approach. Here’s what I’ve learned:

• Begin with a personal observation or experience that intrigued you. It can serve as a powerful springboard into a broader academic discussion. For instance, a personal encounter with a scientific phenomenon could lead to research of scientific theories.
• Critically assess your personal experiences. It’s important to scrutinize and question your experiences, not just narrate them. Ask yourself how these experiences illuminate more significant concepts or ideas within the TOK framework.
• Correlate your reflections with established knowledge. As I know from experience, an essay that weaves personal insights with academic research stands out. Make sure to support your insight with scholarly evidence or theories.

Remember, your TOK essay is an opportunity to showcase your ability to think critically and reflect deeply on the nature of knowledge.

Writing a Clear and Cohesive TOK Essay

According to general IB criteria, clarity and coherence are non-negotiable in a TOK essay. A clear, well-structured essay not only demonstrates your understanding but also engages and convinces your reader. Here are some techniques I’ve found useful:

• Create a detailed essay outline before you start writing. It will help organize your thoughts and ensure each paragraph connects seamlessly to the next.
• Steer clear of unnecessary jargon and overly complex language. Simplicity is often more powerful.
• Each paragraph should serve a purpose. It should either introduce a new idea or build upon the previous one, all contributing to your overarching argument.

Need help with your IB TOK essay?

From research and analysis to structuring and editing, our skilled mentors will be by your side, helping you write an exceptional TOK essay that meets the word count and stringent IB criteria.

From my experience, these strategies will improve the quality of your TOK essay and make the writing process more enjoyable and fulfilling. Also, you can consult with your teacher or supervisor .

Addressing Counterarguments in Your TOK Essay

An aspect that often distinguishes an excellent TOK essay from a good one is the ability to address counterarguments effectively. This skill demonstrates not only depth of understanding but also critical engagement with the essay topic. In my years of writing and mentoring IB students, I’ve gathered some insights on how to do this effectively:

• Begin by thinking about possible objections or alternate viewpoints to your argument. From experience, understanding different perspectives enhances your argument’s depth and shows your ability to engage critically with the topic.
• More than just a counterargument is needed; you should integrate it into your discussion. It means examining how it interacts with your original argument. From my experience, a well-integrated counterargument can strengthen your position by showing you’ve considered multiple angles.
• There are two main ways to deal with a counterargument: refute it with evidence and reasoning or reconcile it with your argument, finding a middle ground. Choose the approach that most effectively strengthens your essay, depending on the situation.

Remember, TOK is about exploring knowledge, not just defending a position. As such, encountering and addressing counterarguments can be a valuable learning experience, offering insights you might not have considered otherwise.

The Bottom Line

May 2024 TOK essay titles are not just academic exercises. They’re gateways to deeper understanding and critical thinking. My parting advice? Be bold in your assertions, critical in your analysis, and most importantly, enjoy the intellectual research. Good luck, scholars! Also, remember that you can always contact our IB writers if you need help with the TOK essay .

Luke MacQuoid has extensive experience teaching English as a foreign language in Japan, having worked with students of all ages for over 12 years. Currently, he is teaching at the tertiary level. Luke holds a BA from the University of Sussex and an MA in TESOL from Lancaster University, both located in England. As well to his work as an IB Examiner and Master Tutor, Luke also enjoys sharing his experiences and insights with others through writing articles for various websites, including extendedessaywriters.com blog

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.