thematic analysis research question

What (Exactly) Is Thematic Analysis?

Plain-Language Explanation & Definition (With Examples)

By: Jenna Crosley (PhD). Expert Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | April 2021

Thematic analysis is one of the most popular qualitative analysis techniques we see students opting for at Grad Coach – and for good reason. Despite its relative simplicity, thematic analysis can be a very powerful analysis technique when used correctly. In this post, we’ll unpack thematic analysis using plain language (and loads of examples) so that you can conquer your analysis with confidence.

Thematic Analysis 101

• Basic terminology relating to thematic analysis
• What is thematic analysis
• When to use thematic analysis
• The main approaches to thematic analysis
• The three types of thematic analysis
• How to “do” thematic analysis (the process)
• Tips and suggestions

First, the lingo…

Before we begin, let’s first lay down some terminology. When undertaking thematic analysis, you’ll make use of codes . A code is a label assigned to a piece of text, and the aim of using a code is to identify and summarise important concepts within a set of data, such as an interview transcript.

For example, if you had the sentence, “My rabbit ate my shoes”, you could use the codes “rabbit” or “shoes” to highlight these two concepts. The process of assigning codes is called qualitative coding . If this is a new concept to you, be sure to check out our detailed post about qualitative coding .

Codes are vital as they lay a foundation for themes . But what exactly is a theme? Simply put, a theme is a pattern that can be identified within a data set. In other words, it’s a topic or concept that pops up repeatedly throughout your data. Grouping your codes into themes serves as a way of summarising sections of your data in a useful way that helps you answer your research question(s) and achieve your research aim(s).

Alright – with that out of the way, let’s jump into the wonderful world of thematic analysis…

What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is the study of patterns to uncover meaning . In other words, it’s about analysing the patterns and themes within your data set to identify the underlying meaning. Importantly, this process is driven by your research aims and questions , so it’s not necessary to identify every possible theme in the data, but rather to focus on the key aspects that relate to your research questions .

Although the research questions are a driving force in thematic analysis (and pretty much all analysis methods), it’s important to remember that these questions are not necessarily fixed . As thematic analysis tends to be a bit of an exploratory process, research questions can evolve as you progress with your coding and theme identification.

When should you use thematic analysis?

There are many potential qualitative analysis methods that you can use to analyse a dataset. For example, content analysis , discourse analysis , and narrative analysis are popular choices. So why use thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is highly beneficial when working with large bodies of data ,  as it allows you to divide and categorise large amounts of data in a way that makes it easier to digest. Thematic analysis is particularly useful when looking for subjective information , such as a participant’s experiences, views, and opinions. For this reason, thematic analysis is often conducted on data derived from interviews , conversations, open-ended survey responses , and social media posts.

Your research questions can also give you an idea of whether you should use thematic analysis or not. For example, if your research questions were to be along the lines of:

• How do dog walkers perceive rules and regulations on dog-friendly beaches?
• What are students’ experiences with the shift to online learning?
• What opinions do health professionals hold about the Hippocratic code?
• How is gender constructed in a high school classroom setting?

These examples are all research questions centering on the subjective experiences of participants and aim to assess experiences, views, and opinions. Therefore, thematic analysis presents a possible approach.

In short, thematic analysis is a good choice when you are wanting to categorise large bodies of data (although the data doesn’t necessarily have to be large), particularly when you are interested in subjective experiences .

What are the main approaches?

Broadly speaking, there are two overarching approaches to thematic analysis: inductive and deductive . The approach you take will depend on what is most suitable in light of your research aims and questions. Let’s have a look at the options.

The inductive approach

The inductive approach involves deriving meaning and creating themes from data without any preconceptions . In other words, you’d dive into your analysis without any idea of what codes and themes will emerge, and thus allow these to emerge from the data.

For example, if you’re investigating typical lunchtime conversational topics in a university faculty, you’d enter the research without any preconceived codes, themes or expected outcomes. Of course, you may have thoughts about what might be discussed (e.g., academic matters because it’s an academic setting), but the objective is to not let these preconceptions inform your analysis.

The inductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are exploratory in nature , and cases where there is little existing research on the topic of interest.

The deductive approach

In contrast to the inductive approach, a deductive approach involves jumping into your analysis with a pre-determined set of codes . Usually, this approach is informed by prior knowledge and/or existing theory or empirical research (which you’d cover in your literature review ).

For example, a researcher examining the impact of a specific psychological intervention on mental health outcomes may draw on an existing theoretical framework that includes concepts such as coping strategies, social support, and self-efficacy, using these as a basis for a set of pre-determined codes.

The deductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are confirmatory in nature , and cases where there is a lot of existing research on the topic of interest.

Regardless of whether you take the inductive or deductive approach, you’ll also need to decide what level of content your analysis will focus on – specifically, the semantic level or the latent level.

A semantic-level focus ignores the underlying meaning of data , and identifies themes based only on what is explicitly or overtly stated or written – in other words, things are taken at face value.

In contrast, a latent-level focus concentrates on the underlying meanings and looks at the reasons for semantic content. Furthermore, in contrast to the semantic approach, a latent approach involves an element of interpretation , where data is not just taken at face value, but meanings are also theorised.

“But how do I know when to use what approach?”, I hear you ask.

Well, this all depends on the type of data you’re analysing and what you’re trying to achieve with your analysis. For example, if you’re aiming to analyse explicit opinions expressed in interviews and you know what you’re looking for ahead of time (based on a collection of prior studies), you may choose to take a deductive approach with a semantic-level focus.

On the other hand, if you’re looking to explore the underlying meaning expressed by participants in a focus group, and you don’t have any preconceptions about what to expect, you’ll likely opt for an inductive approach with a latent-level focus.

Simply put, the nature and focus of your research, especially your research aims , objectives and questions will  inform the approach you take to thematic analysis.

What are the types of thematic analysis?

Now that you’ve got an understanding of the overarching approaches to thematic analysis, it’s time to have a look at the different types of thematic analysis you can conduct. Broadly speaking, there are three “types” of thematic analysis:

• Reflexive thematic analysis
• Codebook thematic analysis
• Coding reliability thematic analysis

Let’s have a look at each of these:

Reflexive thematic analysis takes an inductive approach, letting the codes and themes emerge from that data. This type of thematic analysis is very flexible, as it allows researchers to change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. As the name suggests, reflexive thematic analysis emphasizes the active engagement of the researcher in critically reflecting on their assumptions, biases, and interpretations, and how these may shape the analysis.

Reflexive thematic analysis typically involves iterative and reflexive cycles of coding, interpreting, and reflecting on data, with the aim of producing nuanced and contextually sensitive insights into the research topic, while at the same time recognising and addressing the subjective nature of the research process.

Codebook thematic analysis , on the other hand, lays on the opposite end of the spectrum. Taking a deductive approach, this type of thematic analysis makes use of structured codebooks containing clearly defined, predetermined codes. These codes are typically drawn from a combination of existing theoretical theories, empirical studies and prior knowledge of the situation.

Codebook thematic analysis aims to produce reliable and consistent findings. Therefore, it’s often used in studies where a clear and predefined coding framework is desired to ensure rigour and consistency in data analysis.

Coding reliability thematic analysis necessitates the work of multiple coders, and the design is specifically intended for research teams. With this type of analysis, codebooks are typically fixed and are rarely altered.

The benefit of this form of analysis is that it brings an element of intercoder reliability where coders need to agree upon the codes used, which means that the outcome is more rigorous as the element of subjectivity is reduced. In other words, multiple coders discuss which codes should be used and which shouldn’t, and this consensus reduces the bias of having one individual coder decide upon themes.

Quick Recap: Thematic analysis approaches and types

To recap, the two main approaches to thematic analysis are inductive , and deductive . Then we have the three types of thematic analysis: reflexive, codebook and coding reliability . Which type of thematic analysis you opt for will need to be informed by factors such as:

• The approach you are taking. For example, if you opt for an inductive approach, you’ll likely utilise reflexive thematic analysis.
• Whether you’re working alone or in a group . It’s likely that, if you’re doing research as part of your postgraduate studies, you’ll be working alone. This means that you’ll need to choose between reflexive and codebook thematic analysis.

Now that we’ve covered the “what” in terms of thematic analysis approaches and types, it’s time to look at the “how” of thematic analysis.

Need a helping hand?

How to “do” thematic analysis

At this point, you’re ready to get going with your analysis, so let’s dive right into the thematic analysis process. Keep in mind that what we’ll cover here is a generic process, and the relevant steps will vary depending on the approach and type of thematic analysis you opt for.

Step 1: Get familiar with the data

The first step in your thematic analysis involves getting a feel for your data and seeing what general themes pop up. If you’re working with audio data, this is where you’ll do the transcription , converting audio to text.

At this stage, you’ll want to come up with preliminary thoughts about what you’ll code , what codes you’ll use for them, and what codes will accurately describe your content. It’s a good idea to revisit your research topic , and your aims and objectives at this stage. For example, if you’re looking at what people feel about different types of dogs, you can code according to when different breeds are mentioned (e.g., border collie, Labrador, corgi) and when certain feelings/emotions are brought up.

As a general tip, it’s a good idea to keep a reflexivity journal . This is where you’ll write down how you coded your data, why you coded your data in that particular way, and what the outcomes of this data coding are. Using a reflexive journal from the start will benefit you greatly in the final stages of your analysis because you can reflect on the coding process and assess whether you have coded in a manner that is reliable and whether your codes and themes support your findings.

As you can imagine, a reflexivity journal helps to increase reliability as it allows you to analyse your data systematically and consistently. If you choose to make use of a reflexivity journal, this is the stage where you’ll want to take notes about your initial codes and list them in your journal so that you’ll have an idea of what exactly is being reflected in your data. At a later stage in the analysis, this data can be more thoroughly coded, or the identified codes can be divided into more specific ones.

Step 2: Search for patterns or themes in the codes

Step 2! You’re going strong. In this step, you’ll want to look out for patterns or themes in your codes. Moving from codes to themes is not necessarily a smooth or linear process. As you become more and more familiar with the data, you may find that you need to assign different codes or themes according to new elements you find. For example, if you were analysing a text talking about wildlife, you may come across the codes, “pigeon”, “canary” and “budgerigar” which can fall under the theme of birds.

As you work through the data, you may start to identify subthemes , which are subdivisions of themes that focus specifically on an aspect within the theme that is significant or relevant to your research question. For example, if your theme is a university, your subthemes could be faculties or departments at that university.

In this stage of the analysis, your reflexivity journal entries need to reflect how codes were interpreted and combined to form themes.

Step 3: Review themes

By now you’ll have a good idea of your codes, themes, and potentially subthemes. Now it’s time to review all the themes you’ve identified . In this step, you’ll want to check that everything you’ve categorised as a theme actually fits the data, whether the themes do indeed exist in the data, whether there are any themes missing , and whether you can move on to the next step knowing that you’ve coded all your themes accurately and comprehensively . If you find that your themes have become too broad and there is far too much information under one theme, it may be useful to split this into more themes so that you’re able to be more specific with your analysis.

In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write about how you understood the themes and how they are supported by evidence, as well as how the themes fit in with your codes. At this point, you’ll also want to revisit your research questions and make sure that the data and themes you’ve identified are directly relevant to these questions .

Step 4: Finalise Themes

By this point, your analysis will really start to take shape. In the previous step, you reviewed and refined your themes, and now it’s time to label and finalise them . It’s important to note here that, just because you’ve moved onto the next step, it doesn’t mean that you can’t go back and revise or rework your themes. In contrast to the previous step, finalising your themes means spelling out what exactly the themes consist of, and describe them in detail . If you struggle with this, you may want to return to your data to make sure that your data and coding do represent the themes, and if you need to divide your themes into more themes (i.e., return to step 3).

When you name your themes, make sure that you select labels that accurately encapsulate the properties of the theme . For example, a theme name such as “enthusiasm in professionals” leaves the question of “who are the professionals?”, so you’d want to be more specific and label the theme as something along the lines of “enthusiasm in healthcare professionals”.

It is very important at this stage that you make sure that your themes align with your research aims and questions . When you’re finalising your themes, you’re also nearing the end of your analysis and need to keep in mind that your final report (discussed in the next step) will need to fit in with the aims and objectives of your research.

In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write down a few sentences describing your themes and how you decided on these. Here, you’ll also want to mention how the theme will contribute to the outcomes of your research, and also what it means in relation to your research questions and focus of your research.

By the end of this stage, you’ll be done with your themes – meaning it’s time to write up your findings and produce a report.

Step 5: Produce your report

You’re nearly done! Now that you’ve analysed your data, it’s time to report on your findings. A typical thematic analysis report consists of:

• An introduction
• A methodology section
• Your results and findings
• A conclusion

When writing your report, make sure that you provide enough information for a reader to be able to evaluate the rigour of your analysis. In other words, the reader needs to know the exact process you followed when analysing your data and why. The questions of “what”, “how”, “why”, “who”, and “when” may be useful in this section.

So, what did you investigate? How did you investigate it? Why did you choose this particular method? Who does your research focus on, and who are your participants? When did you conduct your research, when did you collect your data, and when was the data produced? Your reflexivity journal will come in handy here as within it you’ve already labelled, described, and supported your themes.

If you’re undertaking a thematic analysis as part of a dissertation or thesis, this discussion will be split across your methodology, results and discussion chapters . For more information about those chapters, check out our detailed post about dissertation structure .

It’s absolutely vital that, when writing up your results, you back up every single one of your findings with quotations . The reader needs to be able to see that what you’re reporting actually exists within the results. Also make sure that, when reporting your findings, you tie them back to your research questions . You don’t want your reader to be looking through your findings and asking, “So what?”, so make sure that every finding you represent is relevant to your research topic and questions.

Quick Recap: How to “do” thematic analysis

Getting familiar with your data: Here you’ll read through your data and get a general overview of what you’re working with. At this stage, you may identify a few general codes and themes that you’ll make use of in the next step.

Search for patterns or themes in your codes : Here you’ll dive into your data and pick out the themes and codes relevant to your research question(s).

Review themes : In this step, you’ll revisit your codes and themes to make sure that they are all truly representative of the data, and that you can use them in your final report.

Finalise themes : Here’s where you “solidify” your analysis and make it report-ready by describing and defining your themes.

Produce your report : This is the final step of your thematic analysis process, where you put everything you’ve found together and report on your findings.

Tips & Suggestions

In the video below, we share 6 time-saving tips and tricks to help you approach your thematic analysis as effectively and efficiently as possible.

Wrapping Up

In this article, we’ve covered the basics of thematic analysis – what it is, when to use it, the different approaches and types of thematic analysis, and how to perform a thematic analysis.

If you have any questions about thematic analysis, drop a comment below and we’ll do our best to assist. If you’d like 1-on-1 support with your thematic analysis, be sure to check out our research coaching services here .

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

You Might Also Like:

21 Comments

I really appreciate the help

Hello Sir, how many levels of coding can be done in thematic analysis? We generate codes from the transcripts, then subthemes from the codes and themes from subthemes, isn’t it? Should these themes be again grouped together? how many themes can be derived?can you please share an example of coding through thematic analysis in a tabular format?

I’ve found the article very educative and useful

Excellent. Very helpful and easy to understand.

This article so far has been most helpful in understanding how to write an analysis chapter. Thank you.

My research topic is the challenges face by the school principal on the process of procurement . Thematic analysis is it sutable fir data analysis ?

It is a great help. Thanks.

Best advice. Worth reading. Thank you.

Where can I find an example of a template analysis table ?

Finally I got the best article . I wish they also have every psychology topics.

Hello, Sir/Maam

I am actually finding difficulty in doing qualitative analysis of my data and how to triangulate this with quantitative data. I encountered your web by accident in the process of searching for a much simplified way of explaining about thematic analysis such as coding, thematic analysis, write up. When your query if I need help popped up, I was hesitant to answer. Because I think this is for fee and I cannot afford. So May I just ask permission to copy for me to read and guide me to study so I can apply it myself for my gathered qualitative data for my graduate study.

Thank you very much! this is very helpful to me in my Graduate research qualitative data analysis.

Thank you very much. I find your guidance here helpful. Kindly let help me understand how to write findings and discussions.

i am having troubles with the concept of framework analysis which i did not find here and i have been an assignment on framework analysis

I was discouraged and felt insecure because after more than a year of writing my thesis, my work seemed lost its direction after being checked. But, I am truly grateful because through the comments, corrections, and guidance of the wisdom of my director, I can already see the bright light because of thematic analysis. I am working with Biblical Texts. And thematic analysis will be my method. Thank you.

lovely and helpful. thanks

very informative information.

thank you very much!, this is very helpful in my report, God bless……..

Thank you for the insight. I am really relieved as you have provided a super guide for my thesis.

Thanks a lot, really enlightening

excellent! very helpful thank a lot for your great efforts

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• - Google Chrome

Intended for healthcare professionals

• Access provided by Google Indexer
• My email alerts
• BMA member login
• Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution

Search form

• Advanced search
• Search responses
• Search blogs
• Practical thematic...

Practical thematic analysis: a guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis

• Related content
• Peer review
• Catherine H Saunders , scientist and assistant professor 1 2 ,
• Ailyn Sierpe , research project coordinator 2 ,
• Christian von Plessen , senior physician 3 ,
• Alice M Kennedy , research project manager 2 4 ,
• Laura C Leviton , senior adviser 5 ,
• Steven L Bernstein , chief research officer 1 ,
• Jenaya Goldwag , resident physician 1 ,
• Joel R King , research assistant 2 ,
• Christine M Marx , patient associate 6 ,
• Jacqueline A Pogue , research project manager 2 ,
• Richard K Saunders , staff physician 1 ,
• Aricca Van Citters , senior research scientist 2 ,
• Renata W Yen , doctoral student 2 ,
• Glyn Elwyn , professor 2 ,
• JoAnna K Leyenaar , associate professor 1 2
• on behalf of the Coproduction Laboratory
• 1 Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, USA
• 2 Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
• 3 Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland
• 4 Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
• 5 Highland Park, NJ, USA
• 6 Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
• Correspondence to: C H Saunders catherine.hylas.saunders{at}dartmouth.edu
• Accepted 26 April 2023

Qualitative research methods explore and provide deep contextual understanding of real world issues, including people’s beliefs, perspectives, and experiences. Whether through analysis of interviews, focus groups, structured observation, or multimedia data, qualitative methods offer unique insights in applied health services research that other approaches cannot deliver. However, many clinicians and researchers hesitate to use these methods, or might not use them effectively, which can leave relevant areas of inquiry inadequately explored. Thematic analysis is one of the most common and flexible methods to examine qualitative data collected in health services research. This article offers practical thematic analysis as a step-by-step approach to qualitative analysis for health services researchers, with a focus on accessibility for patients, care partners, clinicians, and others new to thematic analysis. Along with detailed instructions covering three steps of reading, coding, and theming, the article includes additional novel and practical guidance on how to draft effective codes, conduct a thematic analysis session, and develop meaningful themes. This approach aims to improve consistency and rigor in thematic analysis, while also making this method more accessible for multidisciplinary research teams.

Through qualitative methods, researchers can provide deep contextual understanding of real world issues, and generate new knowledge to inform hypotheses, theories, research, and clinical care. Approaches to data collection are varied, including interviews, focus groups, structured observation, and analysis of multimedia data, with qualitative research questions aimed at understanding the how and why of human experience. 1 2 Qualitative methods produce unique insights in applied health services research that other approaches cannot deliver. In particular, researchers acknowledge that thematic analysis is a flexible and powerful method of systematically generating robust qualitative research findings by identifying, analysing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data. 3 4 5 6 Although qualitative methods are increasingly valued for answering clinical research questions, many researchers are unsure how to apply them or consider them too time consuming to be useful in responding to practical challenges 7 or pressing situations such as public health emergencies. 8 Consequently, researchers might hesitate to use them, or use them improperly. 9 10 11

Although much has been written about how to perform thematic analysis, practical guidance for non-specialists is sparse. 3 5 6 12 13 In the multidisciplinary field of health services research, qualitative data analysis can confound experienced researchers and novices alike, which can stoke concerns about rigor, particularly for those more familiar with quantitative approaches. 14 Since qualitative methods are an area of specialisation, support from experts is beneficial. However, because non-specialist perspectives can enhance data interpretation and enrich findings, there is a case for making thematic analysis easier, more rapid, and more efficient, 8 particularly for patients, care partners, clinicians, and other stakeholders. A practical guide to thematic analysis might encourage those on the ground to use these methods in their work, unearthing insights that would otherwise remain undiscovered.

Given the need for more accessible qualitative analysis approaches, we present a simple, rigorous, and efficient three step guide for practical thematic analysis. We include new guidance on the mechanics of thematic analysis, including developing codes, constructing meaningful themes, and hosting a thematic analysis session. We also discuss common pitfalls in thematic analysis and how to avoid them.

Summary points

Qualitative methods are increasingly valued in applied health services research, but multidisciplinary research teams often lack accessible step-by-step guidance and might struggle to use these approaches

A newly developed approach, practical thematic analysis, uses three simple steps: reading, coding, and theming

Based on Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, our streamlined yet rigorous approach is designed for multidisciplinary health services research teams, including patients, care partners, and clinicians

This article also provides companion materials including a slide presentation for teaching practical thematic analysis to research teams, a sample thematic analysis session agenda, a theme coproduction template for use during the session, and guidance on using standardised reporting criteria for qualitative research

In their seminal work, Braun and Clarke developed a six phase approach to reflexive thematic analysis. 4 12 We built on their method to develop practical thematic analysis ( box 1 , fig 1 ), which is a simplified and instructive approach that retains the substantive elements of their six phases. Braun and Clarke’s phase 1 (familiarising yourself with the dataset) is represented in our first step of reading. Phase 2 (coding) remains as our second step of coding. Phases 3 (generating initial themes), 4 (developing and reviewing themes), and 5 (refining, defining, and naming themes) are represented in our third step of theming. Phase 6 (writing up) also occurs during this third step of theming, but after a thematic analysis session. 4 12

Key features and applications of practical thematic analysis

Step 1: reading.

All manuscript authors read the data

All manuscript authors write summary memos

Step 2: Coding

Coders perform both data management and early data analysis

Codes are complete thoughts or sentences, not categories

Step 3: Theming

Researchers host a thematic analysis session and share different perspectives

Themes are complete thoughts or sentences, not categories

Applications

For use by practicing clinicians, patients and care partners, students, interdisciplinary teams, and those new to qualitative research

When important insights from healthcare professionals are inaccessible because they do not have qualitative methods training

When time and resources are limited

Steps in practical thematic analysis

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

We present linear steps, but as qualitative research is usually iterative, so too is thematic analysis. 15 Qualitative researchers circle back to earlier work to check whether their interpretations still make sense in the light of additional insights, adapting as necessary. While we focus here on the practical application of thematic analysis in health services research, we recognise our approach exists in the context of the broader literature on thematic analysis and the theoretical underpinnings of qualitative methods as a whole. For a more detailed discussion of these theoretical points, as well as other methods widely used in health services research, we recommend reviewing the sources outlined in supplemental material 1. A strong and nuanced understanding of the context and underlying principles of thematic analysis will allow for higher quality research. 16

Practical thematic analysis is a highly flexible approach that can draw out valuable findings and generate new hypotheses, including in cases with a lack of previous research to build on. The approach can also be used with a variety of data, such as transcripts from interviews or focus groups, patient encounter transcripts, professional publications, observational field notes, and online activity logs. Importantly, successful practical thematic analysis is predicated on having high quality data collected with rigorous methods. We do not describe qualitative research design or data collection here. 11 17

In supplemental material 1, we summarise the foundational methods, concepts, and terminology in qualitative research. Along with our guide below, we include a companion slide presentation for teaching practical thematic analysis to research teams in supplemental material 2. We provide a theme coproduction template for teams to use during thematic analysis sessions in supplemental material 3. Our method aligns with the major qualitative reporting frameworks, including the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). 18 We indicate the corresponding step in practical thematic analysis for each COREQ item in supplemental material 4.

Familiarisation and memoing

We encourage all manuscript authors to review the full dataset (eg, interview transcripts) to familiarise themselves with it. This task is most critical for those who will later be engaged in the coding and theming steps. Although time consuming, it is the best way to involve team members in the intellectual work of data interpretation, so that they can contribute to the analysis and contextualise the results. If this task is not feasible given time limitations or large quantities of data, the data can be divided across team members. In this case, each piece of data should be read by at least two individuals who ideally represent different professional roles or perspectives.

We recommend that researchers reflect on the data and independently write memos, defined as brief notes on thoughts and questions that arise during reading, and a summary of their impressions of the dataset. 2 19 Memoing is an opportunity to gain insights from varying perspectives, particularly from patients, care partners, clinicians, and others. It also gives researchers the opportunity to begin to scope which elements of and concepts in the dataset are relevant to the research question.

Data saturation

The concept of data saturation ( box 2 ) is a foundation of qualitative research. It is defined as the point in analysis at which new data tend to be redundant of data already collected. 21 Qualitative researchers are expected to report their approach to data saturation. 18 Because thematic analysis is iterative, the team should discuss saturation throughout the entire process, beginning with data collection and continuing through all steps of the analysis. 22 During step 1 (reading), team members might discuss data saturation in the context of summary memos. Conversations about saturation continue during step 2 (coding), with confirmation that saturation has been achieved during step 3 (theming). As a rule of thumb, researchers can often achieve saturation in 9-17 interviews or 4-8 focus groups, but this will vary depending on the specific characteristics of the study. 23

Data saturation in context

Braun and Clarke discourage the use of data saturation to determine sample size (eg, number of interviews), because it assumes that there is an objective truth to be captured in the data (sometimes known as a positivist perspective). 20 Qualitative researchers often try to avoid positivist approaches, arguing that there is no one true way of seeing the world, and will instead aim to gather multiple perspectives. 5 Although this theoretical debate with qualitative methods is important, we recognise that a priori estimates of saturation are often needed, particularly for investigators newer to qualitative research who might want a more pragmatic and applied approach. In addition, saturation based, sample size estimation can be particularly helpful in grant proposals. However, researchers should still follow a priori sample size estimation with a discussion to confirm saturation has been achieved.

Definition of coding

We describe codes as labels for concepts in the data that are directly relevant to the study objective. Historically, the purpose of coding was to distil the large amount of data collected into conceptually similar buckets so that researchers could review it in aggregate and identify key themes. 5 24 We advocate for a more analytical approach than is typical with thematic analysis. With our method, coding is both the foundation for and the beginning of thematic analysis—that is, early data analysis, management, and reduction occur simultaneously rather than as different steps. This approach moves the team more efficiently towards being able to describe themes.

Building the coding team

Coders are the research team members who directly assign codes to the data, reading all material and systematically labelling relevant data with appropriate codes. Ideally, at least two researchers would code every discrete data document, such as one interview transcript. 25 If this task is not possible, individual coders can each code a subset of the data that is carefully selected for key characteristics (sometimes known as purposive selection). 26 When using this approach, we recommend that at least 10% of data be coded by two or more coders to ensure consistency in codebook application. We also recommend coding teams of no more than four to five people, for practical reasons concerning maintaining consistency.

Clinicians, patients, and care partners bring unique perspectives to coding and enrich the analytical process. 27 Therefore, we recommend choosing coders with a mix of relevant experiences so that they can challenge and contextualise each other’s interpretations based on their own perspectives and opinions ( box 3 ). We recommend including both coders who collected the data and those who are naive to it, if possible, given their different perspectives. We also recommend all coders review the summary memos from the reading step so that key concepts identified by those not involved in coding can be integrated into the analytical process. In practice, this review means coding the memos themselves and discussing them during the code development process. This approach ensures that the team considers a diversity of perspectives.

Coding teams in context

The recommendation to use multiple coders is a departure from Braun and Clarke. 28 29 When the views, experiences, and training of each coder (sometimes known as positionality) 30 are carefully considered, having multiple coders can enhance interpretation and enrich findings. When these perspectives are combined in a team setting, researchers can create shared meaning from the data. Along with the practical consideration of distributing the workload, 31 inclusion of these multiple perspectives increases the overall quality of the analysis by mitigating the impact of any one coder’s perspective. 30

Coding tools

Qualitative analysis software facilitates coding and managing large datasets but does not perform the analytical work. The researchers must perform the analysis themselves. Most programs support queries and collaborative coding by multiple users. 32 Important factors to consider when choosing software can include accessibility, cost, interoperability, the look and feel of code reports, and the ease of colour coding and merging codes. Coders can also use low tech solutions, including highlighters, word processors, or spreadsheets.

Drafting effective codes

To draft effective codes, we recommend that the coders review each document line by line. 33 As they progress, they can assign codes to segments of data representing passages of interest. 34 Coders can also assign multiple codes to the same passage. Consensus among coders on what constitutes a minimum or maximum amount of text for assigning a code is helpful. As a general rule, meaningful segments of text for coding are shorter than one paragraph, but longer than a few words. Coders should keep the study objective in mind when determining which data are relevant ( box 4 ).

Code types in context

Similar to Braun and Clarke’s approach, practical thematic analysis does not specify whether codes are based on what is evident from the data (sometimes known as semantic) or whether they are based on what can be inferred at a deeper level from the data (sometimes known as latent). 4 12 35 It also does not specify whether they are derived from the data (sometimes known as inductive) or determined ahead of time (sometimes known as deductive). 11 35 Instead, it should be noted that health services researchers conducting qualitative studies often adopt all these approaches to coding (sometimes known as hybrid analysis). 3

In practical thematic analysis, codes should be more descriptive than general categorical labels that simply group data with shared characteristics. At a minimum, codes should form a complete (or full) thought. An easy way to conceptualise full thought codes is as complete sentences with subjects and verbs ( table 1 ), although full sentence coding is not always necessary. With full thought codes, researchers think about the data more deeply and capture this insight in the codes. This coding facilitates the entire analytical process and is especially valuable when moving from codes to broader themes. Experienced qualitative researchers often intuitively use full thought or sentence codes, but this practice has not been explicitly articulated as a path to higher quality coding elsewhere in the literature. 6

Example transcript with codes used in practical thematic analysis 36

• View inline

Depending on the nature of the data, codes might either fall into flat categories or be arranged hierarchically. Flat categories are most common when the data deal with topics on the same conceptual level. In other words, one topic is not a subset of another topic. By contrast, hierarchical codes are more appropriate for concepts that naturally fall above or below each other. Hierarchical coding can also be a useful form of data management and might be necessary when working with a large or complex dataset. 5 Codes grouped into these categories can also make it easier to naturally transition into generating themes from the initial codes. 5 These decisions between flat versus hierarchical coding are part of the work of the coding team. In both cases, coders should ensure that their code structures are guided by their research questions.

Developing the codebook

A codebook is a shared document that lists code labels and comprehensive descriptions for each code, as well as examples observed within the data. Good code descriptions are precise and specific so that coders can consistently assign the same codes to relevant data or articulate why another coder would do so. Codebook development is iterative and involves input from the entire coding team. However, as those closest to the data, coders must resist undue influence, real or perceived, from other team members with conflicting opinions—it is important to mitigate the risk that more senior researchers, like principal investigators, exert undue influence on the coders’ perspectives.

In practical thematic analysis, coders begin codebook development by independently coding a small portion of the data, such as two to three transcripts or other units of analysis. Coders then individually produce their initial codebooks. This task will require them to reflect on, organise, and clarify codes. The coders then meet to reconcile the draft codebooks, which can often be difficult, as some coders tend to lump several concepts together while others will split them into more specific codes. Discussing disagreements and negotiating consensus are necessary parts of early data analysis. Once the codebook is relatively stable, we recommend soliciting input on the codes from all manuscript authors. Yet, coders must ultimately be empowered to finalise the details so that they are comfortable working with the codebook across a large quantity of data.

Assigning codes to the data

After developing the codebook, coders will use it to assign codes to the remaining data. While the codebook’s overall structure should remain constant, coders might continue to add codes corresponding to any new concepts observed in the data. If new codes are added, coders should review the data they have already coded and determine whether the new codes apply. Qualitative data analysis software can be useful for editing or merging codes.

We recommend that coders periodically compare their code occurrences ( box 5 ), with more frequent check-ins if substantial disagreements occur. In the event of large discrepancies in the codes assigned, coders should revise the codebook to ensure that code descriptions are sufficiently clear and comprehensive to support coding alignment going forward. Because coding is an iterative process, the team can adjust the codebook as needed. 5 28 29

Quantitative coding in context

Researchers should generally avoid reporting code counts in thematic analysis. However, counts can be a useful proxy in maintaining alignment between coders on key concepts. 26 In practice, therefore, researchers should make sure that all coders working on the same piece of data assign the same codes with a similar pattern and that their memoing and overall assessment of the data are aligned. 37 However, the frequency of a code alone is not an indicator of its importance. It is more important that coders agree on the most salient points in the data; reviewing and discussing summary memos can be helpful here. 5

Researchers might disagree on whether or not to calculate and report inter-rater reliability. We note that quantitative tests for agreement, such as kappa statistics or intraclass correlation coefficients, can be distracting and might not provide meaningful results in qualitative analyses. Similarly, Braun and Clarke argue that expecting perfect alignment on coding is inconsistent with the goal of co-constructing meaning. 28 29 Overall consensus on codes’ salience and contributions to themes is the most important factor.

Definition of themes

Themes are meta-constructs that rise above codes and unite the dataset ( box 6 , fig 2 ). They should be clearly evident, repeated throughout the dataset, and relevant to the research questions. 38 While codes are often explicit descriptions of the content in the dataset, themes are usually more conceptual and knit the codes together. 39 Some researchers hypothesise that theme development is loosely described in the literature because qualitative researchers simply intuit themes during the analytical process. 39 In practical thematic analysis, we offer a concrete process that should make developing meaningful themes straightforward.

Themes in context

According to Braun and Clarke, a theme “captures something important about the data in relation to the research question and represents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set.” 4 Similarly, Braun and Clarke advise against themes as domain summaries. While different approaches can draw out themes from codes, the process begins by identifying patterns. 28 35 Like Braun and Clarke and others, we recommend that researchers consider the salience of certain themes, their prevalence in the dataset, and their keyness (ie, how relevant the themes are to the overarching research questions). 4 12 34

Use of themes in practical thematic analysis

Constructing meaningful themes

After coding all the data, each coder should independently reflect on the team’s summary memos (step 1), the codebook (step 2), and the coded data itself to develop draft themes (step 3). It can be illuminating for coders to review all excerpts associated with each code, so that they derive themes directly from the data. Researchers should remain focused on the research question during this step, so that themes have a clear relation with the overall project aim. Use of qualitative analysis software will make it easy to view each segment of data tagged with each code. Themes might neatly correspond to groups of codes. Or—more likely—they will unite codes and data in unexpected ways. A whiteboard or presentation slides might be helpful to organise, craft, and revise themes. We also provide a template for coproducing themes (supplemental material 3). As with codebook justification, team members will ideally produce individual drafts of the themes that they have identified in the data. They can then discuss these with the group and reach alignment or consensus on the final themes.

The team should ensure that all themes are salient, meaning that they are: supported by the data, relevant to the study objectives, and important. Similar to codes, themes are framed as complete thoughts or sentences, not categories. While codes and themes might appear to be similar to each other, the key distinction is that the themes represent a broader concept. Table 2 shows examples of codes and their corresponding themes from a previously published project that used practical thematic analysis. 36 Identifying three to four key themes that comprise a broader overarching theme is a useful approach. Themes can also have subthemes, if appropriate. 40 41 42 43 44

Example codes with themes in practical thematic analysis 36

Thematic analysis session

After each coder has independently produced draft themes, a carefully selected subset of the manuscript team meets for a thematic analysis session ( table 3 ). The purpose of this session is to discuss and reach alignment or consensus on the final themes. We recommend a session of three to five hours, either in-person or virtually.

Example agenda of thematic analysis session

The composition of the thematic analysis session team is important, as each person’s perspectives will shape the results. This group is usually a small subset of the broader research team, with three to seven individuals. We recommend that primary and senior authors work together to include people with diverse experiences related to the research topic. They should aim for a range of personalities and professional identities, particularly those of clinicians, trainees, patients, and care partners. At a minimum, all coders and primary and senior authors should participate in the thematic analysis session.

The session begins with each coder presenting their draft themes with supporting quotes from the data. 5 Through respectful and collaborative deliberation, the group will develop a shared set of final themes.

One team member facilitates the session. A firm, confident, and consistent facilitation style with good listening skills is critical. For practical reasons, this person is not usually one of the primary coders. Hierarchies in teams cannot be entirely flattened, but acknowledging them and appointing an external facilitator can reduce their impact. The facilitator can ensure that all voices are heard. For example, they might ask for perspectives from patient partners or more junior researchers, and follow up on comments from senior researchers to say, “We have heard your perspective and it is important; we want to make sure all perspectives in the room are equally considered.” Or, “I hear [senior person] is offering [x] idea, I’d like to hear other perspectives in the room.” The role of the facilitator is critical in the thematic analysis session. The facilitator might also privately discuss with more senior researchers, such as principal investigators and senior authors, the importance of being aware of their influence over others and respecting and eliciting the perspectives of more junior researchers, such as patients, care partners, and students.

To our knowledge, this discrete thematic analysis session is a novel contribution of practical thematic analysis. It helps efficiently incorporate diverse perspectives using the session agenda and theme coproduction template (supplemental material 3) and makes the process of constructing themes transparent to the entire research team.

Writing the report

We recommend beginning the results narrative with a summary of all relevant themes emerging from the analysis, followed by a subheading for each theme. Each subsection begins with a brief description of the theme and is illustrated with relevant quotes, which are contextualised and explained. The write-up should not simply be a list, but should contain meaningful analysis and insight from the researchers, including descriptions of how different stakeholders might have experienced a particular situation differently or unexpectedly.

In addition to weaving quotes into the results narrative, quotes can be presented in a table. This strategy is a particularly helpful when submitting to clinical journals with tight word count limitations. Quote tables might also be effective in illustrating areas of agreement and disagreement across stakeholder groups, with columns representing different groups and rows representing each theme or subtheme. Quotes should include an anonymous label for each participant and any relevant characteristics, such as role or gender. The aim is to produce rich descriptions. 5 We recommend against repeating quotations across multiple themes in the report, so as to avoid confusion. The template for coproducing themes (supplemental material 3) allows documentation of quotes supporting each theme, which might also be useful during report writing.

Visual illustrations such as a thematic map or figure of the findings can help communicate themes efficiently. 4 36 42 44 If a figure is not possible, a simple list can suffice. 36 Both must clearly present the main themes with subthemes. Thematic figures can facilitate confirmation that the researchers’ interpretations reflect the study populations’ perspectives (sometimes known as member checking), because authors can invite discussions about the figure and descriptions of findings and supporting quotes. 46 This process can enhance the validity of the results. 46

In supplemental material 4, we provide additional guidance on reporting thematic analysis consistent with COREQ. 18 Commonly used in health services research, COREQ outlines a standardised list of items to be included in qualitative research reports ( box 7 ).

Reporting in context

We note that use of COREQ or any other reporting guidelines does not in itself produce high quality work and should not be used as a substitute for general methodological rigor. Rather, researchers must consider rigor throughout the entire research process. As the issue of how to conceptualise and achieve rigorous qualitative research continues to be debated, 47 48 we encourage researchers to explicitly discuss how they have looked at methodological rigor in their reports. Specifically, we point researchers to Braun and Clarke’s 2021 tool for evaluating thematic analysis manuscripts for publication (“Twenty questions to guide assessment of TA [thematic analysis] research quality”). 16

Avoiding common pitfalls

Awareness of common mistakes can help researchers avoid improper use of qualitative methods. Improper use can, for example, prevent researchers from developing meaningful themes and can risk drawing inappropriate conclusions from the data. Braun and Clarke also warn of poor quality in qualitative research, noting that “coherence and integrity of published research does not always hold.” 16

Weak themes

An important distinction between high and low quality themes is that high quality themes are descriptive and complete thoughts. As such, they often contain subjects and verbs, and can be expressed as full sentences ( table 2 ). Themes that are simply descriptive categories or topics could fail to impart meaningful knowledge beyond categorisation. 16 49 50

Researchers will often move from coding directly to writing up themes, without performing the work of theming or hosting a thematic analysis session. Skipping concerted theming often results in themes that look more like categories than unifying threads across the data.

Unfocused analysis

Because data collection for qualitative research is often semi-structured (eg, interviews, focus groups), not all data will be directly relevant to the research question at hand. To avoid unfocused analysis and a correspondingly unfocused manuscript, we recommend that all team members keep the research objective in front of them at every stage, from reading to coding to theming. During the thematic analysis session, we recommend that the research question be written on a whiteboard so that all team members can refer back to it, and so that the facilitator can ensure that conversations about themes occur in the context of this question. Consistently focusing on the research question can help to ensure that the final report directly answers it, as opposed to the many other interesting insights that might emerge during the qualitative research process. Such insights can be picked up in a secondary analysis if desired.

Inappropriate quantification

Presenting findings quantitatively (eg, “We found 18 instances of participants mentioning safety concerns about the vaccines”) is generally undesirable in practical thematic analysis reporting. 51 Descriptive terms are more appropriate (eg, “participants had substantial concerns about the vaccines,” or “several participants were concerned about this”). This descriptive presentation is critical because qualitative data might not be consistently elicited across participants, meaning that some individuals might share certain information while others do not, simply based on how conversations evolve. Additionally, qualitative research does not aim to draw inferences outside its specific sample. Emphasising numbers in thematic analysis can lead to readers incorrectly generalising the findings. Although peer reviewers unfamiliar with thematic analysis often request this type of quantification, practitioners of practical thematic analysis can confidently defend their decision to avoid it. If quantification is methodologically important, we recommend simultaneously conducting a survey or incorporating standardised interview techniques into the interview guide. 11

Neglecting group dynamics

Researchers should concertedly consider group dynamics in the research team. Particular attention should be paid to power relations and the personality of team members, which can include aspects such as who most often speaks, who defines concepts, and who resolves disagreements that might arise within the group. 52

The perspectives of patient and care partners are particularly important to cultivate. Ideally, patient partners are meaningfully embedded in studies from start to finish, not just for practical thematic analysis. 53 Meaningful engagement can build trust, which makes it easier for patient partners to ask questions, request clarification, and share their perspectives. Professional team members should actively encourage patient partners by emphasising that their expertise is critically important and valued. Noting when a patient partner might be best positioned to offer their perspective can be particularly powerful.

Insufficient time allocation

Researchers must allocate enough time to complete thematic analysis. Working with qualitative data takes time, especially because it is often not a linear process. As the strength of thematic analysis lies in its ability to make use of the rich details and complexities of the data, we recommend careful planning for the time required to read and code each document.

Estimating the necessary time can be challenging. For step 1 (reading), researchers can roughly calculate the time required based on the time needed to read and reflect on one piece of data. For step 2 (coding), the total amount of time needed can be extrapolated from the time needed to code one document during codebook development. We also recommend three to five hours for the thematic analysis session itself, although coders will need to independently develop their draft themes beforehand. Although the time required for practical thematic analysis is variable, teams should be able to estimate their own required effort with these guidelines.

Practical thematic analysis builds on the foundational work of Braun and Clarke. 4 16 We have reframed their six phase process into three condensed steps of reading, coding, and theming. While we have maintained important elements of Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, we believe that practical thematic analysis is conceptually simpler and easier to teach to less experienced researchers and non-researcher stakeholders. For teams with different levels of familiarity with qualitative methods, this approach presents a clear roadmap to the reading, coding, and theming of qualitative data. Our practical thematic analysis approach promotes efficient learning by doing—experiential learning. 12 29 Practical thematic analysis avoids the risk of relying on complex descriptions of methods and theory and places more emphasis on obtaining meaningful insights from those close to real world clinical environments. Although practical thematic analysis can be used to perform intensive theory based analyses, it lends itself more readily to accelerated, pragmatic approaches.

Strengths and limitations

Our approach is designed to smooth the qualitative analysis process and yield high quality themes. Yet, researchers should note that poorly performed analyses will still produce low quality results. Practical thematic analysis is a qualitative analytical approach; it does not look at study design, data collection, or other important elements of qualitative research. It also might not be the right choice for every qualitative research project. We recommend it for applied health services research questions, where diverse perspectives and simplicity might be valuable.

We also urge researchers to improve internal validity through triangulation methods, such as member checking (supplemental material 1). 46 Member checking could include soliciting input on high level themes, theme definitions, and quotations from participants. This approach might increase rigor.

Implications

We hope that by providing clear and simple instructions for practical thematic analysis, a broader range of researchers will be more inclined to use these methods. Increased transparency and familiarity with qualitative approaches can enhance researchers’ ability to both interpret qualitative studies and offer up new findings themselves. In addition, it can have usefulness in training and reporting. A major strength of this approach is to facilitate meaningful inclusion of patient and care partner perspectives, because their lived experiences can be particularly valuable in data interpretation and the resulting findings. 11 30 As clinicians are especially pressed for time, they might also appreciate a practical set of instructions that can be immediately used to leverage their insights and access to patients and clinical settings, and increase the impact of qualitative research through timely results. 8

Practical thematic analysis is a simplified approach to performing thematic analysis in health services research, a field where the experiences of patients, care partners, and clinicians are of inherent interest. We hope that it will be accessible to those individuals new to qualitative methods, including patients, care partners, clinicians, and other health services researchers. We intend to empower multidisciplinary research teams to explore unanswered questions and make new, important, and rigorous contributions to our understanding of important clinical and health systems research.

Acknowledgments

All members of the Coproduction Laboratory provided input that shaped this manuscript during laboratory meetings. We acknowledge advice from Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, an expert in qualitative methods.

Coproduction Laboratory group contributors: Stephanie C Acquilano ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-5531 ), Julie Doherty ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-6536 ), Rachel C Forcino ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-4830 ), Tina Foster ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-4031 ), Megan Holthoff, Christopher R Jacobs ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-8657 ), Lisa C Johnson ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-4931 ), Elaine T Kiriakopoulos, Kathryn Kirkland ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-926X ), Meredith A MacMartin ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6091 ), Emily A Morgan, Eugene Nelson, Elizabeth O’Donnell, Brant Oliver ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-622X ), Danielle Schubbe ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9858-1805 ), Gabrielle Stevens ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-178X ), Rachael P Thomeer ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-3840 ).

Contributors: Practical thematic analysis, an approach designed for multidisciplinary health services teams new to qualitative research, was based on CHS’s experiences teaching thematic analysis to clinical teams and students. We have drawn heavily from qualitative methods literature. CHS is the guarantor of the article. CHS, AS, CvP, AMK, JRK, and JAP contributed to drafting the manuscript. AS, JG, CMM, JAP, and RWY provided feedback on their experiences using practical thematic analysis. CvP, LCL, SLB, AVC, GE, and JKL advised on qualitative methods in health services research, given extensive experience. All authors meaningfully edited the manuscript content, including AVC and RKS. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Funding: This manuscript did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

• Ziebland S ,
• ↵ A Hybrid Approach to Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research: Using a Practical Example. 2018. https://methods.sagepub.com/case/hybrid-approach-thematic-analysis-qualitative-research-a-practical-example .
• Maguire M ,
• Vindrola-Padros C ,
• Vindrola-Padros B
• ↵ Vindrola-Padros C. Rapid Ethnographies: A Practical Guide . Cambridge University Press 2021. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=n80HEAAAQBAJ
• Schroter S ,
• Merino JG ,
• Barbeau A ,
• ↵ Padgett DK. Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Public Health . SAGE Publications 2011. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=LcYgAQAAQBAJ
• Scharp KM ,
• Korstjens I
• Barnett-Page E ,
• ↵ Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell ML. Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research . SAGE 2013. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=-3rmWYKtloC
• Sainsbury P ,
• Emerson RM ,
• Saunders B ,
• Kingstone T ,
• Hennink MM ,
• Kaiser BN ,
• Hennink M ,
• O’Connor C ,
• ↵ Yen RW, Schubbe D, Walling L, et al. Patient engagement in the What Matters Most trial: experiences and future implications for research. Poster presented at International Shared Decision Making conference, Quebec City, Canada. July 2019.
• ↵ Got questions about Thematic Analysis? We have prepared some answers to common ones. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/faqs/ (accessed 9 Nov 2022).
• ↵ Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications. 2022. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481 .
• Kalpokas N ,
• Radivojevic I
• Campbell KA ,
• Durepos P ,
• ↵ Understanding Thematic Analysis. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/understanding-ta/ .
• Saunders CH ,
• Stevens G ,
• CONFIDENT Study Long-Term Care Partners
• MacQueen K ,
• Vaismoradi M ,
• Turunen H ,
• Schott SL ,
• Berkowitz J ,
• Carpenter-Song EA ,
• Goldwag JL ,
• Durand MA ,
• Goldwag J ,
• Saunders C ,
• Mishra MK ,
• Rodriguez HP ,
• Shortell SM ,
• Verdinelli S ,
• Scagnoli NI
• Campbell C ,
• Sparkes AC ,
• McGannon KR
• Sandelowski M ,
• Connelly LM ,
• O’Malley AJ ,

Reference management. Clean and simple.

How to do a thematic analysis

What is a thematic analysis?

When is thematic analysis used, braun and clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, the six steps of thematic analysis, 1. familiarizing, 2. generating initial codes, 3. generating themes, 4. reviewing themes, 5. defining and naming themes, 6. creating the report, the advantages and disadvantages of thematic analysis, disadvantages, frequently asked questions about thematic analysis, related articles.

Thematic analysis is a broad term that describes an approach to analyzing qualitative data . This approach can encompass diverse methods and is usually applied to a collection of texts, such as survey responses and transcriptions of interviews or focus group discussions. Learn more about different research methods.

A researcher performing a thematic analysis will study a set of data to pinpoint repeating patterns, or themes, in the topics and ideas that are expressed in the texts.

In analyzing qualitative data, thematic analysis focuses on concepts, opinions, and experiences, as opposed to pure statistics. This requires an approach to data that is complex and exploratory and can be anchored by different philosophical and conceptual foundations.

A six-step system was developed to help establish clarity and rigor around this process, and it is this system that is most commonly used when conducting a thematic analysis. The six steps are:

• Familiarization
• Generating codes
• Generating themes
• Reviewing themes
• Defining and naming themes
• Creating the report

It is important to note that even though the six steps are listed in sequence, thematic analysis is not necessarily a linear process that advances forward in a one-way, predictable fashion from step one through step six. Rather, it involves a more fluid shifting back and forth between the phases, adjusting to accommodate new insights when they arise.

And arriving at insight is a key goal of this approach. A good thematic analysis doesn’t just seek to present or summarize data. It interprets and makes a statement about it; it extracts meaning from the data.

Since thematic analysis is used to study qualitative data, it works best in cases where you’re looking to gather information about people’s views, values, opinions, experiences, and knowledge.

Some examples of research questions that thematic analysis can be used to answer are:

• What are senior citizens’ experiences of long-term care homes?
• How do women view social media sites as a tool for professional networking?
• How do non-religious people perceive the role of the church in a society?
• What are financial analysts’ ideas and opinions about cryptocurrency?

To begin answering these questions, you would need to gather data from participants who can provide relevant responses. Once you have the data, you would then analyze and interpret it.

Because you’re dealing with personal views and opinions, there is a lot of room for flexibility in terms of how you interpret the data. In this way, thematic analysis is systematic but not purely scientific.

A landmark 2006 paper by Victoria Braun and Victoria Clarke (“ Using thematic analysis in psychology ”) established parameters around thematic analysis—what it is and how to go about it in a systematic way—which had until then been widely used but poorly defined.

Since then, their work has been updated, with the name being revised, notably, to “reflexive thematic analysis.”

One common misconception that Braun and Clarke have taken pains to clarify about their work is that they do not believe that themes “emerge” from the data. To think otherwise is problematic since this suggests that meaning is somehow inherent to the data and that a researcher is merely an objective medium who identifies that meaning.

Conversely, Braun and Clarke view analysis as an interactive process in which the researcher is an active participant in constructing meaning, rather than simply identifying it.

The six stages they presented in their paper are still the benchmark for conducting a thematic analysis. They are presented below.

This step is where you take a broad, high-level view of your data, looking at it as a whole and taking note of your first impressions.

This typically involves reading through written survey responses and other texts, transcribing audio, and recording any patterns that you notice. It’s important to read through and revisit the data in its entirety several times during this stage so that you develop a thorough grasp of all your data.

After familiarizing yourself with your data, the next step is coding notable features of the data in a methodical way. This often means highlighting portions of the text and applying labels, aka codes, to them that describe the nature of their content.

In our example scenario, we’re researching the experiences of women over the age of 50 on professional networking social media sites. Interviews were conducted to gather data, with the following excerpt from one interview.

In the example interview snippet, portions have been highlighted and coded. The codes describe the idea or perception described in the text.

It pays to be exhaustive and thorough at this stage. Good practice involves scrutinizing the data several times, since new information and insight may become apparent upon further review that didn’t jump out at first glance. Multiple rounds of analysis also allow for the generation of more new codes.

Once the text is thoroughly reviewed, it’s time to collate the data into groups according to their code.

Now that we’ve created our codes, we can examine them, identify patterns within them, and begin generating themes.

Keep in mind that themes are more encompassing than codes. In general, you’ll be bundling multiple codes into a single theme.

To draw on the example we used above about women and networking through social media, codes could be combined into themes in the following way:

You’ll also be curating your codes and may elect to discard some on the basis that they are too broad or not directly relevant. You may also choose to redefine some of your codes as themes and integrate other codes into them. It all depends on the purpose and goal of your research.

This is the stage where we check that the themes we’ve generated accurately and relevantly represent the data they are based on. Once again, it’s beneficial to take a thorough, back-and-forth approach that includes review, assessment, comparison, and inquiry. The following questions can support the review:

• Has anything been overlooked?
• Are the themes definitively supported by the data?
• Is there any room for improvement?

With your final list of themes in hand, the next step is to name and define them.

In defining them, we want to nail down the meaning of each theme and, importantly, how it allows us to make sense of the data.

Once you have your themes defined, you’ll need to apply a concise and straightforward name to each one.

In our example, our “perceived lack of skills” may be adjusted to reflect that the texts expressed uncertainty about skills rather than the definitive absence of them. In this case, a more apt name for the theme might be “questions about competence.”

To finish the process, we put our findings down in writing. As with all scholarly writing, a thematic analysis should open with an introduction section that explains the research question and approach.

This is followed by a statement about the methodology that includes how data was collected and how the thematic analysis was performed.

Each theme is addressed in detail in the results section, with attention paid to the frequency and presence of the themes in the data, as well as what they mean, and with examples from the data included as supporting evidence.

The conclusion section describes how the analysis answers the research question and summarizes the key points.

In our example, the conclusion may assert that it is common for women over the age of 50 to have negative experiences on professional networking sites, and that these are often tied to interactions with other users and a sense that using these sites requires specialized skills.

Thematic analysis is useful for analyzing large data sets, and it allows a lot of flexibility in terms of designing theoretical and research frameworks. Moreover, it supports the generation and interpretation of themes that are backed by data.

There are times when thematic analysis is not the best approach to take because it can be highly subjective, and, in seeking to identify broad patterns, it can overlook nuance in the data.

What’s more, researchers must be judicious about reflecting on how their own position and perspective bears on their interpretations of the data and if they are imposing meaning that is not there or failing to pick up on meaning that is.

Thematic analysis offers a flexible and recursive way to approach qualitative data that has the potential to yield valuable insights about people’s opinions, views, and lived experience. It must be applied, however, in a conscientious fashion so as not to allow subjectivity to taint or obscure the results.

The purpose of thematic analysis is to find repeating patterns, or themes, in qualitative data. Thematic analysis can encompass diverse methods and is usually applied to a collection of texts, such as survey responses and transcriptions of interviews or focus group discussions. In analyzing qualitative data, thematic analysis focuses on concepts, opinions, and experiences, as opposed to pure statistics.

A big advantage of thematic analysis is that it allows a lot of flexibility in terms of designing theoretical and research frameworks. It also supports the generation and interpretation of themes that are backed by data.

A disadvantage of thematic analysis is that it can be highly subjective and can overlook nuance in the data. Also, researchers must be aware of how their own position and perspective influences their interpretations of the data and if they are imposing meaning that is not there or failing to pick up on meaning that is.

How many themes make sense in your thematic analysis of course depends on your topic and the material you are working with. In general, it makes sense to have no more than 6-10 broader themes, instead of having many really detailed ones. You can then identify further nuances and differences under each theme when you are diving deeper into the topic.

Since thematic analysis is used to study qualitative data, it works best in cases where you’re looking to gather information about people’s views, values, opinions, experiences, and knowledge. Therefore, it makes sense to use thematic analysis for interviews.

After familiarizing yourself with your data, the first step of a thematic analysis is coding notable features of the data in a methodical way. This often means highlighting portions of the text and applying labels, aka codes, to them that describe the nature of their content.

How to do thematic analysis

Last updated

8 February 2023

Reviewed by

Miroslav Damyanov

Uncovering themes in data requires a systematic approach. Thematic analysis organizes data so you can easily recognize the context.

• What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is   a method for analyzing qualitative data that involves reading through a data set and looking for patterns to derive themes . The researcher's subjective experience plays a central role in finding meaning within the data.

Streamline your thematic analysis

Find patterns and themes across all your qualitative data when you analyze it in Dovetail

• What are the main approaches to thematic analysis?

Inductive thematic analysis approach

Inductive thematic analysis entails   deriving meaning and identifying themes from data with no preconceptions.  You analyze the data without any expected outcomes.

Deductive thematic analysis approach

In the deductive approach, you analyze data with a set of expected themes. Prior knowledge, research, or existing theory informs this approach.

Semantic thematic analysis approach

With the semantic approach, you ignore the underlying meaning of data. You take identifying themes at face value based on what is written or explicitly stated.

Latent thematic analysis approach

Unlike the semantic approach, the latent approach focuses on underlying meanings in data and looks at the reasons for semantic content. It involves an element of interpretation where you theorize meanings and don’t just take data at face value.

• When should thematic analysis be used?

Thematic analysis is beneficial when you’re working with large bodies of data. It allows you to divide and categorize huge quantities of data in a way that makes it far easier to digest.  

The following scenarios warrant the use of thematic analysis:

You’re new to qualitative analysis

You need to identify patterns in data

You want to involve participants in the process

Thematic analysis is particularly useful when you’re looking for subjective information such as experiences and opinions in surveys , interviews, conversations, or social media posts. 

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is a highly flexible approach to qualitative data analysis that you can modify to meet the needs of many studies. It enables you to generate new insights and concepts from data. 

Beginner researchers who are just learning how to analyze data will find thematic analysis very accessible. It’s easy for most people to grasp and can be relatively quick to learn.

The flexibility of thematic analysis can also be a disadvantage. It can feel intimidating to decide what’s important to emphasize, as there are many ways to interpret meaning from a data set.

• What is the step-by-step process for thematic analysis?

The basic thematic analysis process requires recognizing codes and themes within a data set. A code is a label assigned to a piece of data that you use to identify and summarize important concepts within a data set. A theme is a pattern that you identify within the data. Relevant steps may vary based on the approach and type of thematic analysis, but these are the general steps you’d take:

1. Familiarize yourself with the data(pre-coding work)

Before you can successfully work with data, you need to understand it. Get a feel for the data to see what general themes pop up. Transcribe audio files and observe any meanings and patterns across the data set. Read through the transcript, and jot down notes about potential codes to create. 

2. Create the initial codes (open code work)

Create a set of initial codes to represent the patterns and meanings in the data. Make a codebook to keep track of the codes. Read through the data again to identify interesting excerpts and apply the appropriate codes. You should use the same code to represent excerpts with the same meaning. 

3. Collate codes with supporting data (clustering of initial code)

Now it's time to group all excerpts associated with a particular code. If you’re doing this manually, cut out codes and put them together. Thematic analysis software will automatically collate them.

4. Group codes into themes (clustering of selective codes)

Once you’ve finalized the codes, you can sort them into potential themes. Themes reflect trends and patterns in data. You can combine some codes to create sub-themes.

5. Review, revise, and finalize the themes (final revision)

Now you’ve decided upon the initial themes, you can review and adjust them as needed. Each theme should be distinct, with enough data to support it. You can merge similar themes and remove those lacking sufficient supportive data. Begin formulating themes into a narrative. 

6. Write the report

The final step of telling the story of a set of data is writing the report. You should fully consider the themes to communicate the validity of your analysis.

A typical thematic analysis report contains the following:

An introduction

A methodology section

Results and findings

A conclusion

Your narrative must be coherent, and it should include vivid quotes that can back up points. It should also include an interpretive analysis and argument for your claims. In addition, consider reporting your findings in a flowchart or tree diagram, which can be independent of or part of your report.  

In conclusion, a thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data. By following the six steps, you will identify common themes from a large set of texts. This method can help you find rich and useful insights about people’s experiences, behaviors, and nuanced opinions.

• How to analyze qualitative data

Qualitative data analysis is the process of organizing, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical and subjective data . The goal is to capture themes and patterns, answer questions, and identify the best actions to take based on that data. 

Researchers can use qualitative data to understand people’s thoughts, feelings, and attitudes. For example, qualitative researchers can help business owners draw reliable conclusions about customers’ opinions and discover areas that need improvement. 

In addition to thematic analysis, you can analyze qualitative data using the following:

Content analysis

Content analysis examines and counts the presence of certain words, subjects, and contexts in documents and communication artifacts, such as: 

Text in various formats

This method transforms qualitative input into quantitative data. You can do it manually or with electronic tools that recognize patterns to make connections between concepts.  

Narrative analysis

Narrative analysis interprets research participants' stories from testimonials, case studies, interviews, and other text or visual data. It provides valuable insights into the complexity of people's feelings, beliefs, and behaviors.

Discourse analysis

In discourse analysis , you analyze the underlying meaning of qualitative data in a particular context, including: 

Historical 

This approach allows us to study how people use language in text, audio, and video to unravel social issues, power dynamics, or inequalities. 

For example, you can look at how people communicate with their coworkers versus their bosses. Discourse analysis goes beyond the literal meaning of words to examine social reality.

Grounded theory analysis

In grounded theory analysis, you develop theories by examining real-world data. The process involves creating hypotheses and theories by systematically collecting and evaluating this data. While this approach is helpful for studying lesser-known phenomena, it might be overwhelming for a novice researcher. 

• Challenges with analyzing qualitative data

While qualitative data can answer questions that quantitative data can't, it still comes with challenges.

If done manually, qualitative data analysis is very time-consuming.

It can be hard to choose a method. 

Avoiding bias is difficult.

Human error affects accuracy and consistency.

To overcome these challenges, you should fine-tune your methods by using the appropriate tools in collaboration with teammates.

Learn more about thematic analysis software

What is thematic analysis in qualitative research.

Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data. It is applied to texts, such as interviews or transcripts. The researcher closely examines the data to identify common patterns and themes.

Can thematic analysis be done manually?

You can do thematic analysis manually, but it is very time-consuming without the help of software.

What are the two types of thematic analysis?

The two main types of thematic analysis include codebook thematic analysis and reflexive thematic analysis.

Codebook thematic analysis uses predetermined codes and structured codebooks to analyze from a deductive perspective. You draw codes from a review of the data or an initial analysis to produce the codebooks.

Reflexive thematic analysis is more flexible and does not use a codebook. Researchers can change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. 

What makes a good thematic analysis?

The goal of thematic analysis is more than simply summarizing data; it's about identifying important themes. Good thematic analysis interprets, makes sense of data, and explains it. It produces trustworthy and insightful findings that are easy to understand and apply. 

What are examples of themes in thematic analysis?

Grouping codes into themes summarize sections of data in a useful way to answer research questions and achieve objectives. A theme identifies an area of data and tells the reader something about it. A good theme can sit alone without requiring descriptive text beneath it.

For example, if you were analyzing data on wildlife, codes might be owls, hawks, and falcons. These codes might fall beneath the theme of birds of prey. If your data were about the latest trends for teenage girls, codes such as mini skirts, leggings, and distressed jeans would fall under fashion.  

Thematic analysis is straightforward and intuitive enough that most people have no trouble applying it.

Get started today

Go from raw data to valuable insights with a flexible research platform

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 21 December 2023

Last updated: 16 December 2023

Last updated: 6 October 2023

Last updated: 25 November 2023

Last updated: 12 May 2023

Last updated: 15 February 2024

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 18 May 2023

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 10 April 2023

Last updated: 20 December 2023

Latest articles

Related topics, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 2: Handling Qualitative Data

• Handling qualitative data
• Transcripts
• Field notes
• Survey data and responses
• Visual and audio data
• Data organization
• Data coding
• Coding frame
• Auto and smart coding
• Organizing codes
• Qualitative data analysis

Content analysis

• Introduction

What is meant by thematic analysis?

The thematic analysis process, thematic analysis in other research methods, using atlas.ti for qualitative analysis, considerations for thematic analysis.

• Thematic analysis vs. content analysis
• Narrative research
• Phenomenological research

Discourse analysis

Grounded theory.

• Deductive reasoning
• Inductive reasoning
• Inductive vs. deductive reasoning
• Qualitative data interpretation
• Qualitative analysis software

Thematic analysis

One of the most straightforward forms of qualitative data analysis involves the identification of themes and patterns that appear in otherwise unstructured qualitative data . Thematic analysis is an integral component of qualitative research because it provides an entry point into analyzing qualitative data.

Let's look at thematic analysis, its role in qualitative research methods , and how ATLAS.ti can help you form themes from raw data to generate a theoretical framework .

The main objective of research is to order data into meaningful patterns and generate new knowledge arising from theories about that data. Quantitative data is analyzed to measure a phenomenon's quantifiable aspects (e.g., an element's melting point, the effective income tax rate in the suburbs). The advantage of quantitative research is that data is often already structured, or at least easily structured, to quickly draw insights from numerical values.

On the other hand, some phenomena cannot be easily quantified, or they require conceptual development before they can be quantified. For example, what do people mean when they think of a movie or TV show as "good"? In the everyday world, people in a casual discussion may judge the quality of entertainment as a matter of personal preference, something that cannot be defined, let alone universally understood.

As a result, researchers analyze qualitative data for identifying themes or phenomena that occur often or in telling patterns. In the case of TV shows, a collection of reviews of TV shows may frequently mention the acting, the script writing, and the production values, among other things. If these aspects are mentioned the most often, researchers can think of these as the themes determining the quality of a given TV show.

A useful metaphor for thematic analysis

Even if this is an easy concept to grasp, realizing this concept in qualitative research is a significant challenge. The biggest consideration for thematic analysis is that qualitative data is often unstructured and requires some organization to make it relevant to researchers and their audience.

Imagine that you have a bag of marbles. Each marble has one of a set of different colors. If you were to sort the marbles by color, you could determine how many colors are in the bag and which colors are the most common.

The thematic analysis process is similar to sorting different-colored marbles. Instead of sorting colors, you are sorting themes in a data set to determine which themes appear the most often or to identify patterns among these themes.

After your initial analysis, you can take this one step further and separate "dark" colors from "light" colors or "warm" colors from "cool" colors. Blue and green are distinctly different colors, but you can group them under the "cool" category of colors to form a more overarching theme.

Turn raw data into broader insights with ATLAS.ti

Our powerful data analysis software is available with a free trial.

A simple example of thematic analysis

Imagine a simple research question : how do teachers determine if a student's essay is good? Suppose you have a set of transcripts of interviews with teachers discussing writing classes and students' essays. In this case, the objective of thematic analysis is to determine the main factors teachers use to determine the quality of a piece of writing.

As you read the transcripts, you might find that teachers share some common answers. Of course, you might have an intuition that correct grammar and spelling are important, which will likely be confirmed by the teachers in their interviews. However, other considerations might surface in the data.

The next question in this casual thematic analysis is, what considerations appear most often? A few teachers may occasionally mention the size and typeface of the text as deciding factors, but more often they might say that the flow and organization of students' writing are more important. Analyzing the occurrences and patterns among themes across your transcripts can help you develop an answer to your research question.

The subjectivity of themes

One challenge is that themes in qualitative analysis, as with determining the themes of good writing, are not as visible to the naked eye as colors on a marble. The color "red" is relatively easy to see, but the fields in which thematic analysis is often applied do not deal with concepts that can necessarily be seen "objectively." It is up to the researcher to derive themes from the data from an inductive approach. Researchers can also utilize deductive approaches if they want to analyze their data according to themes that have been previously identified in other research.

Think about the picture up above. To the naked eye, these children are holding hands. But themes that can be interpreted from this picture may include "friendship," "happiness," or even "family." The thematic analysis of pictures like this one often depends on a researcher's theoretical commitments, knowledge base, and cultural perspective.

This also means that you are responsible for explaining how you arrived at the themes arising from your data set. While colors are intuitively easy to distinguish, you are often required to explain more subjective codes and themes like "resilience" or "entitlement" so that you and your research audience have a common understanding of your data analysis .

This explanation should account for who you are as a researcher and how you see the data (since, after all, a word like "resilience" can mean different things to different people). A fully reflexive thematic analysis documents and presents where the researcher is relative to their data and to their research audience.

Applications for thematic analysis

Many disciplines within qualitative research employ thematic analysis to make sense of social phenomena. For instances, these fields might be:

• psychotherapy research
• qualitative psychology
• cultural anthropology

In a nutshell, any research discipline that relies on the understanding of social phenomena or insights that may not easily be quantifiable will attract researchers engaged in thematic analysis. Moreover, any exploratory research design lends itself easily to the identification of previously unknown themes that can later be used in a qualitative, quantitative, or confirmatory research project.

Common forms of data collection

Thematic analysis can involve any number of qualitative research methods to collect data, including:

• focus groups
• observations
• literature reviews

Any unstructured data set, particularly any data set that captures social phenomena, can benefit from thematic analysis. The main consideration in ensuring rigor in data collection for thematic analysis is ensuring that your data is representative of the population or phenomenon you are trying to capture.

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke are the key researchers involved in making thematic analysis a commonly utilized approach in qualitative research . A quick search for their scholarship will tell you the basic steps involved in thematic analysis:

• Become familiar with the data
• Generate codes from the data
• Generate themes based on the codes
• Review the potential themes
• Define the themes for the final reporting

In a nutshell, thematic analysis requires the researcher to look at their data, summarize their data with codes, and develop those codes to the extent that they can contribute a broader understanding of the context from which the data is collected.

While these are the key points in a robust and rigorous thematic analysis, there are understated parts of the qualitative research process that can often be taken for granted but must never be overlooked to ensure that researchers can analyze their data quickly and with as few challenges as possible.

The process in greater detail

Thematic analysis relies on research questions that are exploratory in nature, thus requiring an inductive approach to examining the data. While you might rely on an existing theoretical framework to decide your research questions and collect all the data for your project, thematic analysis primarily looks at your data inductively for what it says and what it says most often.

After data collection, you need to organize the data in some way to make the data analysis process easier (or, at minimum, possible). A data set in qualitative research is often akin to a crowd of people where individuals move in any direction without any sense of organization. This is a challenge if your research question involves understanding the crowd's age, gender, ethnicity, or style of clothing.

The role of qualitative researchers at this stage is to sort out the crowd. In this example, perhaps this means having the crowd split into different groups according to those demographic identifiers to see which groups are the largest. Reorganizing the crowd from what was previously a group of wandering individuals can offer a better sense of who is in the room.

Qualitative data is often similarly unstructured and in need of reorganization. When dealing with thematic analysis, you need to reorganize the information so that the themes become more apparent to you and your research audience. In most cases, this means reducing the entire data set, as large as it might be, into a more concise form that allows for a more feasible analysis .

Codes and themes are forms of data reduction that address this need. In a thematic analysis involving qualitative data analysis software , researchers code their data by applying short but descriptive phrases to larger data segments to summarize them for later analysis. Later stages of thematic analysis reorganize these codes into larger categories and then themes, where ultimately the themes support contribution to meaningful insights and existing theory.

As you progress in the coding process, you should start to notice that distinct codes may be related to each other. In a sense, codes provide researchers with visual data that they can examine to generate useful themes. ATLAS.ti, for example, lets you examine your codes in the margin to give you a sense of which codes and themes frequently appear in your data. As you code your data, you can apply colors to your codes. This is a flexible method that allows you to create preliminary categories that you can examine visually for their abundance and patterns.

Later on, your codes can be organized into more formal categories or nested in hierarchies to contribute to a more robust thematic analysis.

Especially in qualitative research , discrete analytical approaches overlap with each other, meaning that a sufficiently thorough analysis of your data can eventually yield themes useful to your research. Let's examine a few of the more prominent approaches in qualitative research and their relation to thematic analysis.

Using grounded theory involves developing analysis iteratively through an inductive approach . While there is a great deal of overlap with thematic analysis approaches, grounded theory relies on incorporating more data to support the analysis in previous iterations of the research.

Nonetheless, the analytic process is largely the same for both approaches as they rely on seeking out phenomena that occur in abundance or distinct patterns. As you analyze qualitative data in either orientation, your main consideration is to observe which patterns emerge that can help contribute to a more universal understanding of the population or phenomenon under observation.

Narrative analysis

Understanding narratives is often less about taking large samples of data and more about unpacking the meaning that is produced in the data that is collected. In narrative research analysis , the data set is merely the narrative to be examined for its meaning, intent, and effect on its audience.

Searching for abundant or patterned themes is still a common objective when examining narratives. However, specific questions guide a narrative analysis, such as what the narrator is trying to say, how they say it, and how their audience receives the narrator's message.

Analyzing discourse is similar to analyzing narratives in that there is an examination of the subtext informing the use of words in communication. Research questions under both of these approaches focus specifically on language and communication, while thematic analysis can apply to all forms of data.

The scope of analysis is also different among approaches. Thematic analysis seeks to identify patterns in abundance. In contrast, discourse analysis can look at individual instances in discursive practices to more fully understand why people use language in a particular way.

However, the data resulting from an analysis of discursive practices can also be examined thematically. Discursive patterns within culturally-defined groups and cultural practices can be determined with a thematic analysis when utterances or interactional turns and patterns among them can be identified.

Among all the approaches in this section, content analysis is arguably the most quantitative. Strictly speaking, the words or phrases that appear most often in a body of textual data can tell something useful about the data as a whole. For example, imagine how we feel when a public speaker says "um" or "uh" an excessive number of times compared to another speaker who doesn't use these utterances at all. In another case, what can we say about the confidence of a person who frequently writes, "I don't know, but..."?

Content analysis seeks to determine the frequencies of aspects of language to understand a body of data. Unlike discourse analysis, however, content analysis looks strictly at what is said or written, with analysis primarily stemming from a statistical understanding of the data.

Oftentimes, content analysis is deductive in that it might apply previous theory to new data, unlike thematic analysis, which is primarily inductive in nature. That said, the findings from a content analysis can be used to determine themes, particularly if your research question can be addressed by directly looking at the textual data.

For thematic analysis, software is especially useful for identifying themes within large data sets. After all, thematically analyzing data by hand can be time-consuming, and a researcher might miss nuanced data without software to help them look at all the data thoroughly.

Coding qualitative data

For qualitative researchers, the coding process is one of the key tools for structuring qualitative data to facilitate any data analysis . In ATLAS.ti, data is broken down into quotations or segments of data that can be reduced to a set of codes that can be analyzed later.

The codes and quotations appear in the margin next to a document in ATLAS.ti. This visualization is useful in showing how much of your data is coded and what concise meaning can be inferred from the data. In terms of thematic analysis, however, the codes can be assigned different colors based on what the researcher perceives as categories emerging from their project, as seen in the example above.

As you code the data iteratively, reviewing themes as they emerge, you can organize discrete codes within larger categories. ATLAS.ti provides spaces in your project called code groups and code categories where sets of codes in tandem represent broader, more theoretically developed themes. This approach to data organization , rather than merging codes together as broader units, allows for a more particular analysis of individual codes as your research questions evolve and develop over the course of your project.

ATLAS.ti tools for thematic analysis

As discussed above, analyzing qualitative data for themes can often be a matter of determining which codes and which categories of codes appear across the data and patterns among them. Indeed, any analysis software can assist you with this coding process for thematic analysis. The tools in ATLAS.ti, however, can help to make the process easier and more insightful. Let's look at a few of the many important features that are invaluable to conducting thematic analysis.

Code Manager

The Code Manager is ATLAS.ti's central space where researchers can organize and analyze their codes independent of the raw data . Researchers can perform numerous tasks in the Code Manager depending on their research questions and objectives, including looking just at the data that is associated with a particular code, organizing codes into hierarchies through code categories and nested sub-codes, and determining the frequencies and level of theoretical development for each code.

Co-Occurrence Analysis

Combinations of codes that overlap with each other can also illuminate themes in your data, perhaps more ably than discrete codes. This is different from understanding codes as groups, as an analysis for codes that frequently occur together in the data can give a sense of the relationships between different aspects of a phenomenon.

The Co-Occurrence Analysis tool helps researchers determine co-occurrence between different codes by placing them in a table, a bar chart, a Sankey diagram, or a force-directed graph. These visualizations can illustrate the strength of relationships between codes to you and your research audience. The relationships themselves can also be useful in generating themes useful for your analysis.

Word Frequencies

Qualitative content analysis depends on the frequencies of words, phrases, and other important aspects found in textual data. These frequencies can also help you in generating themes, particularly if your research questions are focused on the textual data itself.

The Word Frequencies tool in ATLAS.ti can facilitate a content analysis leading to a thematic analysis by giving you statistical data about what words appear most often in your project. Suppose these words can contribute to the development of themes. In that case, you can click on these words to find relevant quotations that you can code for thematic analysis. In addition, you can use ATLAS.ti’s Text Search tool to search for data segments that contain your word(s) of interest and automatically code them .

You can also use themes to refine the scope of the Word Frequencies tool. By default, Word Frequencies looks at documents, but the tool also allows researchers to filter the data by selecting the codes relevant to their query. That way, you can look at the most relevant data quotations that match your desired codes for a richer thematic analysis.

Patterns and themes may also emerge from combinations of codes, in which case the Query Tool can help you construct smart codes. Smart codes are more versatile than nested sub-codes or code groups as they allow you to set multiple criteria based on true/false conditions as well as proximity. For example, while a code group simply aggregates distinct codes together to show you quotations with any of the included codes, you can define a set of rules to filter the data and find the most relevant quotations for your thematic analysis.

A systematic and rigorous approach to thematic analysis involves showing your research audience how you arrived at your codes and themes. In qualitative research , visualizations offer clarity about the data in your project, which is a critical skill when explaining the broader meaning derived from otherwise unstructured data .

A TreeMap of codes is a representation of the application of codes relative to each other. In other words, codes that have been applied the most often in your data occupy the largest portions of the TreeMap, while less frequently used codes appear smaller in your visualization. This can give you a sense of the prevalence of certain codes over other codes. Moreover, when you assign colors to codes along the lines of themes and categories, you can quickly get a visual understanding of the themes that appear most often in your project.

As a result, the TreeMap for codes can help provide a visual, thematic map that you can export as an image for use in explaining key themes in your research reports .

In qualitative research , thematic analysis is a useful means for generating a theoretical framework for qualitative concepts and phenomena. As always, though, theoretical development is best supported by thorough research. A theory that emerges from thematic analysis can be affirmed by additional inquiries, whether through a qualitative, quantitative , or mixed methods study .

Further research is always recommended for qualitative research, such as those that employ a thematic analysis, for the very reason that themes in qualitative concepts are socially constructed by the researcher. In turn, future research building on thematic analysis depends on a research design that is transparent and clearly defined so that other researchers can understand how the themes were generated in the first place. This requires a detailed accounting of the data and the analysis through comprehensive detail and visualizations in the final report.

To that end, ATLAS.ti's various tools are specifically designed to allow researchers to share and report their data to their research audiences through data reports and visualizations. Especially where qualitative research and thematic analysis are involved, researchers can benefit from transparently showing their analysis through data excerpts, visualizations , and descriptions of their methodology.

Analyze and visualize all your data in ATLAS.ti

Identify patterns and potential themes from your data with ATLAS.ti. Download a free trial today.

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research Research Tools and Apps

Thematic Analysis: What it is and How to Do It

Qualitative analysis may be a highly effective analytical approach when done correctly. Thematic analysis is one of the most frequently used qualitative analysis approaches.

One advantage of this analysis is that it is a versatile technique that can be utilized for both exploratory research (where you don’t know what patterns to look for) and more deductive studies (where you see what you’re searching for).

LEARN ABOUT:  Research Process Steps

This article will break it down and show you how to do the thematic analysis correctly.

What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is a method for analyzing qualitative data that involves reading through a set of data and looking for patterns in the meaning of the data to find themes. It is an active process of reflexivity in which the researcher’s subjective experience is at the center of making sense of the data.

LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Interview

Thematic analysis is typical in qualitative research. It emphasizes identifying, analyzing, and interpreting qualitative data patterns.

With this analysis, you can look at qualitative data in a certain way. It is usually used to describe a group of texts, like an interview or a set of transcripts. The researcher looks closely at the data to find common themes: repeated ideas, topics, or ways of putting things.

LEARN ABOUT: Data Analytics Projects

Thematic Analysis Advantages and Disadvantages

A technical or pragmatic view of research design focuses on researchers conducting qualitative analyzes using the method most appropriate to the research question. However, there is seldom a single ideal or suitable method, so other criteria are often used to select methods of analysis: the researcher’s theoretical commitments and familiarity with particular techniques.

The thematic analysis provides a flexible method of data analysis and allows researchers with diverse methodological backgrounds to participate in this type of analysis. Data analytics and data analysis are closely related processes that involve extracting insights from data to make informed decisions.

For positivists, ‘reliability’ is a concern because of the many possible interpretations of the data and the potential for researcher subjectivity to ‘bias’ or distort the analysis. For those committed to the values ​​of steps in qualitative research , researcher subjectivity is seen as a resource (rather than a threat to credibility), so concerns about reliability do not remain.

There is no correct or precise interpretation of the data. The interpretations are inevitably subjective and reflect the position of the researcher. Quality is achieved through a systematic and rigorous approach and the researcher’s continual reflection on how they shape the developing analysis.

Thematic analysis has several advantages and disadvantages. It is up to the researchers to decide if this analysis method is suitable for their research design.

• The flexibility of theoretical and research design allows researchers multiple theories that can be applied to this process in various epistemologies.
• Very suitable for large data sets.
• The coding and codebook reliability approaches are designed for use with research teams.
• Interpretation of themes supported by data.
• Applicable to research questions that go beyond the experience of an individual.
• It allows the inductive development of codes and themes from data.

Disadvantages

• Thematic analysis can miss nuanced data if the researcher is not careful and uses thematic analysis in a theoretical vacuum.
• The flexibility can make it difficult for novice researchers to decide which aspects of the data to focus on.
• Limited interpretive power if the analysis is not based on a theoretical framework.
• It is challenging to maintain a sense of data continuity across individual accounts due to the focus on identifying themes across all data elements.
• Unlike discourse analysis and narrative analysis, it does not allow researchers to make technical claims about language use.

LEARN ABOUT: Level of Analysis

Thematic Analysis Steps

Let’s jump right into the process of thematic analysis. Remember that what we’ll talk about here is a general process, and the steps you need to take will depend on your approach and the research design .

1. Familiarization

The first stage in thematic analysis is examining your data for broad themes. This is where you transcribe audio data to text.

At this stage, you’ll need to decide what to code, what to employ, and which codes best represent your content. Now consider your topic’s emphasis and goals.

Keep a reflexivity diary. You’ll explain how you coded the data, why, and the results here. You may reflect on the coding process and examine if your codes and themes support your results. Using a reflective notebook from the start can help you in the later phases of your analysis.

A reflexivity journal increases dependability by allowing systematic, consistent data analysis . If using a reflexivity journal, specify your starting codes to see what your data reflects. Later on, the coded data may be analyzed more extensively or may find separate codes.

2. Look for themes in the codes.

At this stage, search for coding patterns or themes. From codes to themes is not a smooth or straightforward process. You may need to assign alternative codes or themes to learn more about the data.

As you analyze the data, you may uncover subthemes and subdivisions of themes that concentrate on a significant or relevant component. At this point, your reflexivity diary entries should indicate how codes were understood and integrated to produce themes.

3. Review themes

Now that you know your codes, themes, and subthemes. Evaluate your topics. At this stage, you’ll verify that everything you’ve classified as a theme matches the data and whether it exists in the data. If any themes are missing, you can continue to the next step, knowing you’ve coded all your themes properly and thoroughly.

If your topics are too broad and there’s too much material under each one, you may want to separate them so you can be more particular with your research .

In your reflexivity journal, please explain how you comprehended the themes, how they’re backed by evidence, and how they connect with your codes. You should also evaluate your research questions to ensure the facts and topics you’ve uncovered are relevant.

4. Finalize Themes

Your analysis will take shape now after reviewing and refining your themes, labeling, and finishing them. Just because you’ve moved on doesn’t mean you can’t edit or rethink your topics. Finalizing your themes requires explaining them in-depth, unlike the previous phase. Whether you have trouble, check your data and code to see if they reflect the themes and whenever you need to split them into multiple pieces.

Make sure your theme name appropriately describes its features.

Ensure your themes match your research questions at this point. When refining, you’re reaching the end of your analysis. You must remember that your final report (covered in the following phase) must meet your research’s goals and objectives.

In your reflexivity journal, explain how you choose your topics. Mention how the theme will affect your research results and what it implies for your research questions and emphasis.

By the conclusion of this stage, you’ll have finished your topics and be able to write a report.

5. Report writing

At this stage, you are nearly done! Now that you’ve examined your data write a report. A thematic analysis report includes:

• An approach
• The results

When drafting your report, provide enough details for a client to assess your findings. In other words, the viewer wants to know how you analyzed the data and why. “What”, “how”, “why”, “who”, and “when” are helpful here.

So, what did you find? What did you do? How did you choose this method? Who are your research’s focus and participants? When were your studies, data collection , and data production? Your reflexivity notebook will help you name, explain, and support your topics.

While writing up your results, you must identify every single one. The reader needs to be able to verify your findings. Make sure to relate your results to your research questions when reporting them. Practical business intelligence relies on the synergy between analytics and reporting , where analytics uncovers valuable insights, and reporting communicates these findings to stakeholders. You don’t want your client to wonder about your results, so make sure they’re related to your subject and queries.

LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Research Questions and Questionnaires

Because it is easy to apply, thematic analysis suits beginner researchers unfamiliar with more complicated qualitative research . It permits the researcher to choose a theoretical framework with freedom.

The versatility of thematic analysis enables you to describe your data in a rich, intricate, and sophisticated way. This technique may be utilized with whatever theory the researcher chooses, unlike other methods of analysis that are firmly bound to specific approaches. These steps can be followed to master proper thematic analysis for research.

QuestionPro can help with the best survey software and the right people to answer your questions. We have everything you can think of. We have them all: B2B, B2C, and niche.

When collecting data, we have different security layers to eliminate respondents who say “yes,” aren’t paying attention, have duplicate IP addresses, etc., before they even start the survey.

LEARN MORE         FREE TRIAL

MORE LIKE THIS

Customer Communication Tool: Types, Methods, Uses, & Tools

Apr 23, 2024

Top 12 Sentiment Analysis Tools for Understanding Emotions

QuestionPro BI: From Research Data to Actionable Dashboards

Apr 22, 2024

21 Best Customer Experience Management Software in 2024

Other categories.

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Uncategorized
• Video Learning Series
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

• How it works

Thematic Analysis – A Guide with Examples

Published by Alvin Nicolas at August 16th, 2021 , Revised On August 29, 2023

Thematic analysis is one of the most important types of analysis used for qualitative data . When researchers have to analyse audio or video transcripts, they give preference to thematic analysis. A researcher needs to look keenly at the content to identify the context and the message conveyed by the speaker.

Moreover, with the help of this analysis, data can be simplified.  

Importance of Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis has so many unique and dynamic features, some of which are given below:

Thematic analysis is used because:

• It is flexible.
• It is best for complex data sets.
• It is applied to qualitative data sets.
• It takes less complexity compared to other theories of analysis.

Intellectuals and researchers give preference to thematic analysis due to its effectiveness in the research.

How to Conduct a Thematic Analysis?

While doing any research , if your data and procedure are clear, it will be easier for your reader to understand how you concluded the results . This will add much clarity to your research.

Understand the Data

This is the first step of your thematic analysis. At this stage, you have to understand the data set. You need to read the entire data instead of reading the small portion. If you do not have the data in the textual form, you have to transcribe it.

Example: If you are visiting an adult dating website, you have to make a data corpus. You should read and re-read the data and consider several profiles. It will give you an idea of how adults represent themselves on dating sites. You may get the following results:

I am a tall, single(widowed), easy-going, honest, good listener with a good sense of humor. Being a handyperson, I keep busy working around the house, and I also like to follow my favourite hockey team on TV or spoil my two granddaughters when I get the chance!! Enjoy most music except Rap! I keep fit by jogging, walking, and bicycling (at least three times a week). I have travelled to many places and RVD the South-West U.S., but I would now like to find that special travel partner to do more travel to warm and interesting countries. I now feel it’s time to meet a nice, kind, honest woman who has some of the same interests as I do; to share the happy times, quiet times, and adventures together

I enjoy photography, lapidary & seeking collectibles in the form of classic movies & 33 1/3, 45 & 78 RPM recordings from the 1920s, ’30s & ’40s. I am retired & looking forward to travelling to Canada, the USA, the UK & Europe, China. I am unique since I do not judge a book by its cover. I accept people for who they are. I will not demand or request perfection from anyone until I am perfect, so I guess that means everyone is safe. My musical tastes range from Classical, big band era, early jazz, classic ’50s & 60’s rock & roll & country since its inception.

Development of Initial Coding:

At this stage, you have to do coding. It’s the essential step of your research . Here you have two options for coding. Either you can do the coding manually or take the help of any tool. A software named the NOVIC is considered the best tool for doing automatic coding.

For manual coding, you can follow the steps given below:

• Please write down the data in a proper format so that it can be easier to proceed.
• Use a highlighter to highlight all the essential points from data.
• Make as many points as possible.
• Take notes very carefully at this stage.
• Apply themes as much possible.
• Now check out the themes of the same pattern or concept.
• Turn all the same themes into the single one.

Example: For better understanding, the previously explained example of Step 1 is continued here. You can observe the coded profiles below:

Make Themes

At this stage, you have to make the themes. These themes should be categorised based on the codes. All the codes which have previously been generated should be turned into themes. Moreover, with the help of the codes, some themes and sub-themes can also be created. This process is usually done with the help of visuals so that a reader can take an in-depth look at first glance itself.

Extracted Data Review

Now you have to take an in-depth look at all the awarded themes again. You have to check whether all the given themes are organised properly or not. It would help if you were careful and focused because you have to note down the symmetry here. If you find that all the themes are not coherent, you can revise them. You can also reshape the data so that there will be symmetry between the themes and dataset here.

For better understanding, a mind-mapping example is given here:

Reviewing all the Themes Again

You need to review the themes after coding them. At this stage, you are allowed to play with your themes in a more detailed manner. You have to convert the bigger themes into smaller themes here. If you want to combine some similar themes into a single theme, then you can do it. This step involves two steps for better fragmentation. 

You need to observe the coded data separately so that you can have a precise view. If you find that the themes which are given are following the dataset, it’s okay. Otherwise, you may have to rearrange the data again to coherence in the coded data.

Corpus Data

Here you have to take into consideration all the corpus data again. It would help if you found how themes are arranged here. It would help if you used the visuals to check out the relationship between them. Suppose all the things are not done accordingly, so you should check out the previous steps for a refined process. Otherwise, you can move to the next step. However, make sure that all the themes are satisfactory and you are not confused.

When all the two steps are completed, you need to make a more précised mind map. An example following the previous cases has been given below:

Define all the Themes here

Now you have to define all the themes which you have given to your data set. You can recheck them carefully if you feel that some of them can fit into one concept, you can keep them, and eliminate the other irrelevant themes. Because it should be precise and clear, there should not be any ambiguity. Now you have to think about the main idea and check out that all the given themes are parallel to your main idea or not. This can change the concept for you.

The given names should be so that it can give any reader a clear idea about your findings. However, it should not oppose your thematic analysis; rather, everything should be organised accurately.

Does your Research Methodology Have the Following?

• Great Research/Sources
• Perfect Language
• Accurate Sources

If not, we can help. Our panel of experts makes sure to keep the 3 pillars of Research Methodology strong.

Also, read about discourse analysis , content analysis and survey conducting . we have provided comprehensive guides.

Make a Report

You need to make the final report of all the findings you have done at this stage. You should include the dataset, findings, and every aspect of your analysis in it.

While making the final report , do not forget to consider your audience. For instance, you are writing for the Newsletter, Journal, Public awareness, etc., your report should be according to your audience. It should be concise and have some logic; it should not be repetitive. You can use the references of other relevant sources as evidence to support your discussion.  

Frequently Asked Questions

What is meant by thematic analysis.

Thematic Analysis is a qualitative research method that involves identifying, analyzing, and interpreting recurring themes or patterns in data. It aims to uncover underlying meanings, ideas, and concepts within the dataset, providing insights into participants’ perspectives and experiences.

You May Also Like

This article provides the key advantages of primary research over secondary research so you can make an informed decision.

Discourse analysis is an essential aspect of studying a language. It is used in various disciplines of social science and humanities such as linguistic, sociolinguistics, and psycholinguistic.

What are the different types of research you can use in your dissertation? Here are some guidelines to help you choose a research strategy that would make your research more credible.

USEFUL LINKS

LEARNING RESOURCES

COMPANY DETAILS

• How It Works

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.21(12); 2021 Dec

General-purpose thematic analysis: a useful qualitative method for anaesthesia research

1 Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

2 Department of Anaesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Learning objectives

By reading this article, you should be able to:

• • Explain when to use thematic analysis.
• • Describe the steps in thematic analysis of interview data.
• • Critique the quality of a study that uses the method of thematic analysis.
• • Thematic analysis is a popular method for systematically analysing qualitative data, such as interview and focus group transcripts.
• • It is one of a cluster of methods that focus on identifying patterns of meaning, or themes, across a data set.
• • It is relevant to many questions in perioperative medicine and a good starting point for those new to qualitative research.
• • Systematic approaches to thematically analysing data exist, with key components to demonstrate rigour, accountability, confirmability and reliability.
• • In one study, a useful six-step approach to analysing data is offered.

Anaesthesia research commonly uses quantitative methods, such as surveys, RCTs or observational studies. Such methods are often concerned with answering what questions and how many questions. Qualitative research is more concerned with why questions that enable us to understand social complexities. ‘Qualitative studies in the anaesthetic setting’, write Shelton and colleagues, ‘have been used to define excellence in anaesthesia, explore the reasons behind drug errors, investigate the acquisition of expertise and examine incentives for hand hygiene in the operating theatre’. 1

General-purpose thematic analysis (termed thematic analysis hereafter) is a qualitative research method commonly used with interview and focus group data to understand people's experiences, ideas and perceptions about a given topic. Thematic analysis is a good starting point for those new to qualitative research and is relevant to many questions in the perioperative context. It can be used to understand the experiences of healthcare professionals and patients and their families. Box 1 gives examples of questions amenable to thematic analysis in anaesthesia research.

Examples of questions amenable to thematic analysis.

• (i) How do operating theatre staff feel about speaking up with their concerns?
• (ii) What are trainee's conceptions of the balance between service and learning?
• (iii) What are patients' experiences of preoperative neurocognitive screening?

Alt-text: Box 1

Thematic analysis involves a process of assigning data to a number of codes, grouping codes into themes and then identifying patterns and interconnections between these themes. 2 Thematic analysis allows for a nuanced understanding of what people say and do within their particular social contexts. Of note, thematic analysis can be used with interviews and focus groups and other sources of data, such as documents or images.

Thematic analysis is not the same as content analysis. Content analysis involves counting the frequency with which words or phrases appear in data. Content analysis is a method used to code and categorise textual information systematically to determine trends, frequency and patterns of words used. 3 Conversely, thematic analysis focuses on the relative importance of ideas and how ideas connect and govern practices. Thematic analysis does not rely on frequency counts to indicate the importance of coded data. Content analysis can be coupled with thematic analysis, where both themes and frequencies of particular statements or words are reported.

Thematic analysis is a research method, not a methodology. A methodology is a method with a philosophical underpinning. If researchers report only on what they did, this is the method. If, in addition, they report on the philosophy that governed what they did, this is methodology. Common methodologies in qualitative research include phenomenology, grounded theory, hermeneutics, narrative enquiry and ethnography. 4 Each of these methodologies has associated methods for data analysis. Thematic analysis can be combined with many different qualitative methodologies.

There are also different types of thematic analysis, such as inductive (including general purpose), applied, deductive or semantic thematic analysis. Inductive analysis involves approaching the data with an open mind, inductively looking for patterns and themes and interpreting these for meaning. 2 , 4 Of note, researchers can never have a truly open mind on their topic of interest, so the process will be influenced by their particular perspectives, which need to be declared. In applied and deductive thematic analysis, the researcher will have a pre-existing framework (which may be informed by theory or philosophy) against which they will attempt to categorise the data. 4 , 5 , 6 For semantic thematic analysis, the data are coded on explicit content, and tend to be descriptive rather than interpretative. 6

In this review, we outline what thematic analysis entails and when to use it. We also list some markers to look for to appraise the quality of a published study.

Designing the data collection

Before embarking on qualitative research, as with quantitative research, it is important to seek ethical review of the proposed study. Ethical considerations include such issues as consent, data security and confidentiality, permission to use quotes, potential for identifying individuals or institutions, risk of psychological harm to participants with studies on sensitive issues (e.g. suicide or sexual harassment), power relationships between interviewer and interviewee or intrusion on other activities (such as teaching time or work commitments). 7

Qualitative research often involves asking people questions during interviews or focus groups. Merriam and Tisdell stated that, ‘The most common form of interview is the person-to-person encounter in which one person elicits information from the other’. 8 Information is elicited through careful and purposeful questioning and listening. 9 Research interviews in anaesthesia are generally purposeful conversations with a structure that allows the researcher to gather information about a participant's ideas, perceptions and experiences concerning a given topic.

A structured interview is when the researcher has already decided on a set of questions to ask. 9 If the researcher will ask a set of questions, but has flexibility to follow up responses with further questions, this is called a semi-structured interview. Semi-structured interviews are commonly used in research involving thematic analysis. The researcher can also use other forms of questioning, such as single-question interview. Semi-structured interviews are commonly used in anaesthesia, such as the studies from our own research group. 10 , 11 , 12

Interviews are usually recorded in audio form and then transcribed. For each interview or focus group, a single transcript is created. The transcripts become the written form of data and the collection of transcripts from the research participants becomes the data set.

Designing productive interview questions

The design of interview questions significantly shapes a participant's response. Interview questions should be designed using ‘sensitising concepts’ to encourage participants to share information that will increase a researcher's understanding of the participants' experiences, views, beliefs and behaviours. 13 ‘Sensitising concepts’ describe words in questions that bring the participants' attention to a concept of research interest. Examples of sensitising concepts include speaking up, teamwork and theoretical concepts (such as Kolb's experiential learning cycle or Foucauldian power theory in relation to trainee learning and operating theatre culture). 14 , 15 Specifically, the questions should be framed in such a way as to encourage participants to make sense of their own experience and in their own words. The researcher should try to minimise the influences of their own biases when they design questions. Using open-ended questions will increase the richness of data. Box 2 gives examples of question design.

How to design an interview question.

Alt-text: Box 2

Bias, positionality and reflexivity

Bias is an inclination or prejudice for or against someone or something, whereas positionality is a person's position in society or their stance towards someone or something. For example, Tanisha once had an inexperienced anaesthetist accidentally rupture one of her veins whilst they were siting an i.v. cannula in an emergency situation. Now, Tanisha has a bias against inexperienced anaesthetists. Tanisha's positionality —a medical anthropologist with no anaesthesia training, but working with many anaesthesia colleagues, including her director—may also inform that bias or the way that Tanisha interacts with anaesthetists. Reflexivity is a process whereby people/researchers proactively reflect on their biases and positionality. Biases shape positionality (i.e. the stance of the researcher in relation to the social, historical and political contexts of the study). In practical research terms, biases and positionality inform the way researchers design and undertake research, and the way they interpret data. It is important in qualitative research to both identify biases and positionality, and to take steps to minimise the impact of these on the research.

Some ways to minimise the influence of bias and positionality on findings include:

(i) Raise awareness amongst the research team of bias and positionality.

(ii) Design research/interview questions that minimise potential for these to distort which data are collected or how they are collected.

(iii) Researchers ask reflexive questions during data analysis, such as, ‘Is my bias about xxx informing my view of these data?’

(iv) Two or more researchers are involved in the analysis process.

(v) Data analysis member check (e.g. checking back with participants if the interpretation of their data is consistent with their experience and with what they said).

Before embarking on the study, researchers should consider their own experiences, knowledge and views; how this influences their own position in relation to the study question; and how this position could potentially introduce bias in how they collect and analyse the data. Taking time to reflect on the impact of the researchers' position is an important step towards being reflective and transparent throughout the research process. When writing up the study, researchers should include statements on bias and positionality. In quantitative research, we aim to eliminate bias. In qualitative research, we acknowledge that bias is inevitable (and sometimes even unconscious), and we take steps to make it explicit and to minimise its effect on study design and data interpretation.

Sampling and saturation

Qualitative research typically uses systematic, non-probability sampling. Unlike quantitative research, the goal of sampling is not to randomly select a representative sample from a population. Instead, researchers identify and select individuals or groups relevant to the research question. Commonly used sampling techniques in anaesthesia qualitative research are homogeneous (group) sampling and maximum variation sampling. In the former, researchers may be concerned with the experiences of participants from a distinct group or who share a certain characteristic (e.g. female anaesthesia trainees), so they recruit selectively from within the group with this shared characteristic to gain a rich, in-depth understanding of their experiences. Conversely, the aim with maximum variation sampling is to recruit participants with diverse characteristics to obtain a broad understanding of the question being studied (e.g. members of different professional groups within operating theatre teams, who have diverse ages, gender and ethnicities).

As with quantitative research, the purpose of sampling is to recruit sufficient numbers of participants to enable identification of patterns or richness in what they say or do to understand or explain the phenomenon of interest, and where collecting more data is unlikely to change this understanding.

In qualitative research, data collection and analysis often occur concurrently. This is because data collection is an iterative process both in recruitment and in questioning. The researchers may identify that more data are needed from a particular demographic group or on a particular theme to reach data saturation, so the next participants may be selected from a particular demographic, or be asked slightly different questions or probes to draw out that theme. Sample size is considered adequate when little or no new information emerges from interviews or focus groups; this is generally termed ‘data saturation’, although some qualitative researchers use the term ‘data sufficiency’. This could also be explained in terms of data reliability (i.e. the researcher is satisfied that collecting more data will not substantially change the results). Data saturation typically occurs with between 12 and 17 participants in a relatively homogeneous sampling, but larger numbers may be required, where the interviewees are from distinct groups or cultures. 16 , 17

Data management

For data sets that involve 10 or more transcripts or lengthy interviews (e.g. 90 min or more), researchers often use software to help them collate and manage the data. The most commonly used qualitative software packages are QSR NVivo, Atlas and Dedoose. 18 , 19 , 20 Many researchers use Microsoft Excel instead, or for small data sets the analysis can be done by hand, with pen, paper and scissors (i.e. researchers cut up printed transcripts and reorder the information according to code and theme). 21 NVivo and Atlas are simply repositories, in which you can input the transcripts and, using your coding scheme, sort the text into codes. They facilitate the task of analysis, rather than doing the analysis for you. Some advantages over coding by hand are that text can be allocated to more than one code, and you can easily identify the source of the segment of text you have coded.

Data analysis

Qualitative data analysis is ‘the classification and interpretation of linguistic (or visual) material to make statements about implicit and explicit dimensions and structures of meaning-making in the material and what is represented in it’. 22

Several social scientists have described this analytical process in depth. 2 , 6 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 For inductive studies, we recommend researchers follow Braun and Clarke's practical six-phase approach to thematic analysis. 26 The phases are (i) familiarising the researcher with the data, (ii) generating initial codes, (iii) searching for themes, (iv) reviewing themes, (v) defining and naming themes and (vi) producing the report. These six phases are described next.

Phase 1: familiarising the researcher with the data

In this step, the researchers read the transcripts to become familiar with them and take notes on potential recurring ideas or potential themes. They share and discuss their ideas and, in conjunction with any sensitising concepts, they start thinking about possible codes or themes.

Phase 2: generating initial codes

The first step in Phase 2 is ‘assigning some sort of short-hand designation to various aspects of your data so that you can easily retrieve specific pieces of the data’. 2 The designation might be a word or a short phrase that summarises or captures the essence of a particular piece of text. Coding makes it easier to summarise and compare, which is important because qualitative research is primarily about synthesis and comparison of data. 2 , 25 As the researcher reads through the data, they assign codes. If they are coding a transcript, they might highlight some words, for example, and attach to them a single word that summarises their meaning.

Researchers undertaking thematic analysis should iteratively develop a ‘coding scheme’, which is essentially a list of the codes they create as they read the data, and definitions for each code. 25 , 26 Code definitions are important, as they help the researcher make decisions on whether to assign this code or another one to a segment of data. In Table 1 , we have provided an example of text data in Column 1. TJ analysed these data. To do so, she asked, ‘What are these data about? How does it answer the research question? What is the essence of this statement?’ She underlined keywords and created codes and definitions (Columns 2 and 3). Then, TJ searched the remaining data to see if any more data met each code definition, and if so, coded that (see Table 1 ). As demonstrated in Table 1 , data can be coded to multiple codes.

Table 1

How to code qualitative data: an example

In thematic analysis of interview data, we recommend that code definitions begin with something objective, such as ‘participant describes’. This keeps the researcher's focus on what participants said rather than what the researcher thought or said.

There is no set rule for how many codes to create. 25 However, in our experience, effective manageable coding schemes tend to have between 15 and 50 codes. The coding scheme is iterative. This means that the coding scheme is developed over time, with new codes being created as more data are coded. For example, after a close reading of the first transcript, the researcher might create, say, 10 codes that convey the key points. Then, the researcher reads and codes the next transcript and may, for instance, create additional four codes. As additional transcripts are read and coded, more codes may be created. Not all codes are relevant to all transcripts. The researcher will notice patterns as they code more transcripts. Some codes may be too broad and will need to be refined into two or three smaller codes (and vice versa ). Once the coding scheme is deemed complete and all transcripts have been coded, the researcher should go back to the beginning and recode the first few transcripts to ensure coding rigour.

The second step in Phase 2, once the coding is complete, is to collate all the data relevant to each of these codes.

Phase 3: searching for themes

In this phase, the researchers look across the codes to identify connections between them, with the intention of collating the codes into possible themes. Once these possible themes have been identified, all the data relevant to each possible theme are pulled together under that theme.

Phase 4: reviewing the themes

After the initial collation of the data into themes, the researchers undertake a rigorous process of checking the integrity of these themes, through reading and re-reading their data. This process includes checking to see if the themes ‘fit’ in relation to the coded excerpts (i.e. Do all the data collected under that theme fit within that theme?). Next is checking if the themes fit in relation to the whole data set (i.e. Do the themes adequately reflect the data?) This step may result in the search for additional themes. As a final step in this phase, the researchers create a thematic ‘map’ of the analysis.

When viewed together, the themes should answer the research question and should summarise participant experiences, views or behaviours.

Phase 5: naming the themes

Once researchers have checked the themes and included any additional emerging themes they name the final set of themes identified. Each theme and any subthemes should be listed in turn.

Phase 6: producing the report

The report should summarise the themes and illustrate them by choosing vivid or persuasive extracts from the data. For data arising from interviews, extracts will be quotes from participants. In some studies, researchers also report strong associations between themes, or divide a theme into sub-themes.

Tight word limits on many academic journals can make it difficult to include multiple quotes in the text. 27 One way around a word limit is to provide quotes in a table or a supplementary file, although quotes within the text tend to make for more interesting and compelling reading.

Who should analyse the data?

Ideally, each researcher in the team should be involved in the data analysis. Contrasting researcher viewpoints on the same study subject enhance data quality and validity, and minimise research bias. Independent analysis is time and resource intensive. In clinical research, close independent analysis by each member of the research team may be impractical, and one or two members may undertake the analysis while the rest of the research team read sections of data (e.g. reading two or three transcripts rather than closely analysing the whole data set), thus contributing to Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Braun and Clarke's method. 2

The research team should regularly meet to discuss the analytical process, as described earlier, to workshop and reach agreement on the coding and emergent themes (Phase 4 and Phase 5). The research team members compare their perspectives on the data, analyse divergences and coincidences and reach agreement on codes and emerging themes. Contrasting researcher viewpoints on the same study subject enhance data quality and validity, and minimise research bias.

Judging the quality and rigour of published studies involving thematic analysis

There are a number of indicators of quality when reading and appraising studies. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 In essence, the authors should clearly state their method of analysis (e.g. thematic analysis) and should reference the literature relevant to their qualitative method, for example Braun and Clarke. 2 This is to indicate that they are following established steps in thematic analysis. The authors should include in the methods a description of the research team, their biases and experience and the efforts made to ensure analytical rigour. Verbatim quotes should be included in the findings to provide evidence to support the themes.

A number of guides have been published to assist readers, researchers and reviewers to evaluate the quality of a qualitative study. 30 , 31 The Joanna Briggs Institute guide to critical appraisal of qualitative studies is a good start. 30 This guide includes a set of 10 criteria, which can be used to rate the study. The criteria are summarised in Box 3 . Within these criteria lie rigorous methodological approaches to how data are collected, analysed and interpreted.

Ten quality appraisal criteria for qualitative literature.31

• (i) Alignment between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology
• (ii) Alignment between the research methodology and the research question or objectives
• (iii) Alignment between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data
• (iv) Alignment between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data
• (v) Alignment between the research methodology and the interpretation of results
• (vi) A statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically (positionality and bias)
• (vii) The influence of the researcher on the research, and vice versa
• (viii) Adequate representation of participants and their voices
• (ix) Ethical research conduct and evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body
• (x) Conclusions flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data

Alt-text: Box 3

Another approach to quality appraisal comes from Lincoln and Guba, who have published widely on the topic of judging qualitative quality. 28 They look for quality in terms of credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability and authenticity. There are many qualitative checklists readily accessible online, such as the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist or the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist, which researchers can include in their work to demonstrate quality in these areas.

Conclusions

As with quantitative research, qualitative research has requirements for rigour and trustworthiness. Thematic analysis is an accessible qualitative method that can offer researchers insight into the shared experiences, views and behaviours of research participants.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

The associated MCQs (to support CME/CPD activity) will be accessible at www.bjaed.org/cme/home by subscribers to BJA Education .

Biographies

Tanisha Jowsey PhD BA (Hons) MA PhD is a senior lecturer in the Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, School of Medicine, University of Auckland. She has a background in medical anthropology and has expertise as a qualitative researcher.

Carolyn Deng MPH FANZCA is a specialist anaesthetist at Auckland City Hospital. She has a Master of Public Health degree. She is embarking on qualitative research in perioperative medicine and hopes to use it as a tool to complement quantitative research findings in the future.

Jennifer Weller MD MClinEd FANZCA FRCA is head of the Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education at the University of Auckland. Professor Weller is a specialist anaesthetist at Auckland City Hospital and often uses qualitative methods in her research in clinical education, teamwork and patients' safety.

Matrix codes: 1A01, 2A01, 3A01

Thematic Analysis

• First Online: 02 January 2023

Cite this chapter

• Vicki Squires 4  

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Education ((SPTE))

5365 Accesses

4 Citations

Thematic analysis is a method of qualitative data analysis that was first described in the 1970s (Joffe, Harper and Thompson (eds), Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012) but became more prominent at the end of the 1990s with researchers such as Boyatzis ( 1998 ) and Hayes ( 1997 ) (as cited in Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology (vol.2) (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.). As qualitfvecome more accepted across social science disciplines and now across health professions education, the need for systematic methods to analyze qualitative sets is more accentuated (Castleberry and Nolen, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 10:807–815, 2018). ( Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology (vol.2) (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.) highlighted that thematic analysis is “an accessible, flexible, and increasingly popular method of qualitative data analysis” (p. 57). Although thematic analysis shares similarities with other methodologies that have systematic processes for analyzing data such as Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis or grounded theory, it does not “require the detailed theoretical and technological knowledge” of these approaches (Braun and Clarke, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3:77–101, 2006). However, (Braun and Clarke, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3:77–101, 2006) emphasized that the theoretical position of the study needs to be made explicit, as there are inherent assumptions regarding the nature of the data that has been analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (vol.2) (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.

Google Scholar  

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 , 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Article   Google Scholar  

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development . Sage.

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10 , 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 , 1–11.

Hayes, N. (1997). Theory-led thematic analysis: Social identification in small companies. In N. Hayes (Ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp. 93–114). Psychology Press.

Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 203–223). Wiley-Blackwell.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 , 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Schwandt, T. A. (2015). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19 (1–2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.19.1-2.75

Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods , 19 , 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810

Additional Resources

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11 (4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education , 9 (3), 3351–3364. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335

Thematic analysis:-7:23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZtdcz6m890

Thematic analysis (the ‘Braun & Clarke’ way): an introduction-1:02:19

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zFcC10vOVY

Understanding Thematic Analysis: 6 steps to perform Thematic Analysis- 6:26

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WodStS6nQSk

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15 (3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Vicki Squires

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicki Squires .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Educational Administration, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Janet Mola Okoko

Scott Tunison

Department of Educational Administration, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Keith D. Walker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Squires, V. (2023). Thematic Analysis. In: Okoko, J.M., Tunison, S., Walker, K.D. (eds) Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_72

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_72

Published : 02 January 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-04396-3

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-04394-9

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples

How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples

Published on 5 May 2022 by Jack Caulfield .

Thematic analysis is a method of analysing qualitative data . It is usually applied to a set of texts, such as an interview or transcripts . The researcher closely examines the data to identify common themes, topics, ideas and patterns of meaning that come up repeatedly.

There are various approaches to conducting thematic analysis, but the most common form follows a six-step process:

• Familiarisation
• Generating themes
• Reviewing themes
• Defining and naming themes

This process was originally developed for psychology research by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke . However, thematic analysis is a flexible method that can be adapted to many different kinds of research.

Table of contents

When to use thematic analysis, different approaches to thematic analysis, step 1: familiarisation, step 2: coding, step 3: generating themes, step 4: reviewing themes, step 5: defining and naming themes, step 6: writing up.

Thematic analysis is a good approach to research where you’re trying to find out something about people’s views, opinions, knowledge, experiences, or values from a set of qualitative data – for example, interview transcripts , social media profiles, or survey responses .

Some types of research questions you might use thematic analysis to answer:

• How do patients perceive doctors in a hospital setting?
• What are young women’s experiences on dating sites?
• What are non-experts’ ideas and opinions about climate change?
• How is gender constructed in secondary school history teaching?

To answer any of these questions, you would collect data from a group of relevant participants and then analyse it. Thematic analysis allows you a lot of flexibility in interpreting the data, and allows you to approach large datasets more easily by sorting them into broad themes.

However, it also involves the risk of missing nuances in the data. Thematic analysis is often quite subjective and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your own choices and interpretations.

Pay close attention to the data to ensure that you’re not picking up on things that are not there – or obscuring things that are.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Once you’ve decided to use thematic analysis, there are different approaches to consider.

There’s the distinction between inductive and deductive approaches:

• An inductive approach involves allowing the data to determine your themes.
• A deductive approach involves coming to the data with some preconceived themes you expect to find reflected there, based on theory or existing knowledge.

There’s also the distinction between a semantic and a latent approach:

• A semantic approach involves analysing the explicit content of the data.
• A latent approach involves reading into the subtext and assumptions underlying the data.

After you’ve decided thematic analysis is the right method for analysing your data, and you’ve thought about the approach you’re going to take, you can follow the six steps developed by Braun and Clarke .

The first step is to get to know our data. It’s important to get a thorough overview of all the data we collected before we start analysing individual items.

This might involve transcribing audio , reading through the text and taking initial notes, and generally looking through the data to get familiar with it.

Next up, we need to code the data. Coding means highlighting sections of our text – usually phrases or sentences – and coming up with shorthand labels or ‘codes’ to describe their content.

Let’s take a short example text. Say we’re researching perceptions of climate change among conservative voters aged 50 and up, and we have collected data through a series of interviews. An extract from one interview looks like this:

In this extract, we’ve highlighted various phrases in different colours corresponding to different codes. Each code describes the idea or feeling expressed in that part of the text.

At this stage, we want to be thorough: we go through the transcript of every interview and highlight everything that jumps out as relevant or potentially interesting. As well as highlighting all the phrases and sentences that match these codes, we can keep adding new codes as we go through the text.

After we’ve been through the text, we collate together all the data into groups identified by code. These codes allow us to gain a condensed overview of the main points and common meanings that recur throughout the data.

Next, we look over the codes we’ve created, identify patterns among them, and start coming up with themes.

Themes are generally broader than codes. Most of the time, you’ll combine several codes into a single theme. In our example, we might start combining codes into themes like this:

At this stage, we might decide that some of our codes are too vague or not relevant enough (for example, because they don’t appear very often in the data), so they can be discarded.

Other codes might become themes in their own right. In our example, we decided that the code ‘uncertainty’ made sense as a theme, with some other codes incorporated into it.

Again, what we decide will vary according to what we’re trying to find out. We want to create potential themes that tell us something helpful about the data for our purposes.

Now we have to make sure that our themes are useful and accurate representations of the data. Here, we return to the dataset and compare our themes against it. Are we missing anything? Are these themes really present in the data? What can we change to make our themes work better?

If we encounter problems with our themes, we might split them up, combine them, discard them, or create new ones: whatever makes them more useful and accurate.

For example, we might decide upon looking through the data that ‘changing terminology’ fits better under the ‘uncertainty’ theme than under ‘distrust of experts’, since the data labelled with this code involves confusion, not necessarily distrust.

Now that you have a final list of themes, it’s time to name and define each of them.

Defining themes involves formulating exactly what we mean by each theme and figuring out how it helps us understand the data.

Naming themes involves coming up with a succinct and easily understandable name for each theme.

For example, we might look at ‘distrust of experts’ and determine exactly who we mean by ‘experts’ in this theme. We might decide that a better name for the theme is ‘distrust of authority’ or ‘conspiracy thinking’.

Finally, we’ll write up our analysis of the data. Like all academic texts, writing up a thematic analysis requires an introduction to establish our research question, aims, and approach.

We should also include a methodology section, describing how we collected the data (e.g., through semi-structured interviews or open-ended survey questions ) and explaining how we conducted the thematic analysis itself.

The results or findings section usually addresses each theme in turn. We describe how often the themes come up and what they mean, including examples from the data as evidence. Finally, our conclusion explains the main takeaways and shows how the analysis has answered our research question.

In our example, we might argue that conspiracy thinking about climate change is widespread among older conservative voters, point out the uncertainty with which many voters view the issue, and discuss the role of misinformation in respondents’ perceptions.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2022, May 05). How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 22 April 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/thematic-analysis-explained/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, qualitative vs quantitative research | examples & methods, inductive reasoning | types, examples, explanation, what is deductive reasoning | explanation & examples.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 22: Thematic Analysis

Darshini Ayton

Learning outcomes

Upon completion of this chapter, you should be able to:

• Describe the different approaches to thematic analysis.
• Understand how to conduct the three types of thematic analysis.
• Identify the strengths and limitations of each type of thematic analysis.

What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is a common method used in the analysis of qualitative data to identify, analyse and interpret meaning through a systematic process of generating codes (see Chapter 20) that leads to the development of themes. 1 Thematic analysis requires the active engagement of the researcher with the data, in a process of sorting, categorising and interpretation. 1 Thematic analysis is exploratory analysis whereby codes are not predetermined and are data-derived, usually from primary sources of data (e,g, interviews and focus groups). This is in contrast to themes generated through directed or summative content analysis, which is considered confirmatory hypothesis-driven analysis, with predetermined codes typically generated from a hypothesis (see Chapter 21). 2 There are many forms of thematic analysis. Hence, it is important to treat thematic analysis as one of many methods of analysis, and to justify the approach on the basis of the research question and pragmatic considerations such as resources, time and audience. The three main forms of thematic analysis used in health and social care research, discussed in this chapter, are:

Applied thematic analysis

• Framework analysis
• Reflexive thematic analysis.

This involves multiple, inductive analytic techniques designed to identify and examine themes from textual data in a way that is transparent and credible, drawing from a broad range of theoretical and methodological perspectives. It focuses on presenting the stories of participants as accurately and comprehensively as possible. Applied thematic analysis mixes a bit of everything: grounded theory, positivism, interpretivism and phenomenology. 2

Applied thematic analysis borrows what we feel are the more useful techniques from each theoretical and methodological camp and adapts them to an applied research context. 2(p16)

Applied thematic analysis involves five elements:

• Text s egmentation  involves identifying a meaningful segment of text and the boundaries of the segment. Text segmentation is a useful process as a transcript from a 30-minute interview can be many pages long. Hence, segmenting the text provides a manageable section of the data for interrogation of meaning. For example, text segmentation may be a participant’s response to an interview question, a keyword or concept in context, or a complete discourse between participants. The segment of text is more than a short phrase and can be both small and large sections of text. Text segments can also overlap, and a smaller segment may be embedded within a larger segment. 3
• Creation of the codebook is a critical element of applied thematic analysis. The codebook is created when the segments of text are systematically coded into categories, types and relationships, and the codes are defined by the observed meaning in the text. The codes and their definitions are descriptive in the beginning, and then evolve into explanatory codes as the researcher examines the commonalities, differences and relationships between the codes. The codebook is an iterative document that the researcher builds and refines as they become more immersed and familiar with the data. 3 Table 22.1 outlines the key components of a codebook. 3

Table 22.1. Codebook components and an example

• Structural coding can be useful if a structured interview guide or focus group guide has been used by the researcher and the researcher stays close to the wording of the question and its prompts. The structured question is the structural code in the codebook, and the text segment should include the participant’s response and any dialogue following the question. Of course, this form of coding can be used even if the researcher does not follow a structured guide, which is often the reality of qualitative data collection. The relevant text segments are coded for the specific structure, as appropriate. 3
• Content coding is informed by the research question(s) and the questions informing the analysis. The segmented text is grouped in different ways to explore relationships, hierarchies, descriptions and explanations of events, similarities, differences and consequences. The content of the text segment should be read and re-read to identify patterns and meaning, with the generated codes added to the codebook.
• Themes vary in scope, yet at the core they are phrases or statements that explain the meaning of the text. Researchers need to be aware that themes are considered a higher conceptual level than codes, and therefore should not be comprised of single words or labels. Typically, multiple codes will lead to a theme. Revisiting the research and analysis questions will assist the researcher to identify themes. Through the coding process, the researcher actively searches the data for themes. Examples of how themes may be identified include the repetition of concepts within and across transcripts, the use of metaphors and analogies, key phrases and common phrases used in an unfamiliar way. 3

Framework a nalysis

This method originated in the 1980s in social policy research. Framework analysis is suited to research seeking to answer specific questions about a problem or issue, within a limited time frame and with homogenous data (in topics, concepts and participants); multiple researchers are usually involved in the coding process. 4-6 The process of framework analysis is methodical and suits large data sets, hence is attractive to quantitative researchers and health services researchers. Framework analysis is useful for multidisciplinary teams in which not all members are familiar with qualitative analysis. Framework analysis does not seek to generate theory and is not aligned with any particular epistemological, philosophical or theoretical approach. 5 The output of framework analysis is a matrix with rows (cases), columns (codes) and cells of summarised data that enables researchers to analyse the data case by case and code by code. The case is usually an individual interview, or it can be a defined group or organisation. 5

The process for conducting framework analysis is as follows 5 :

1. Transcription – usually verbatim transcription of the interview.

2. Familiarisation with the interview – reading the transcript and listening to the audio recording (particularly if the researcher doing the analysis did not conduct the interview) can assist in the interpretation of the data. Notes on analytical observations, thoughts and impressions are made in the margins of the transcript during this stage.

3. Coding – completed in a line-by-line method by at least two researchers from different disciplines (or with a patient or public involvement representative), where possible. Coding can be both deductive – (using a theory or specific topics relevant to the project – or inductive, whereby open coding is applied to elements such as behaviours, incidents, values, attitudes, beliefs, emotions and participant reactions. All data is coded.

4. Developing a working analytical framework – codes are collated and organised into categories, to create a structure for summarising or reducing the data.

5. Applying the analytical framework – indexing the remaining transcripts by using the categories and codes of the analytical framework.

6. Charting data into the framework matrix – summarising the data by category and from each transcript into the framework matrix, which is a spreadsheet with numbered cells in which summarised data are entered by codes (columns) and cases (rows). Charting needs to balance the reduction of data to a manageable few lines and retention of the meaning and ‘feel’ of the participant. References to illustrative quotes should be included.

7. Interpreting the data – using the framework matrix and notes taken throughout the analysis process to interpret meaning, in collaboration with team members, including lay and clinical members.

Reflexive thematic analysis

This is the thematic analysis approach developed by Braun and Clarke in 2006 and explained in the highly cited article ‘ Using thematic analysis in psychology ’ . 7 Reflexive thematic analysis recognises the subjectiveness of the analysis process, and that codes and themes are actively generated by the researcher. Hence, themes and codes are influenced by the researcher’s values, skills and experiences. 8 Reflexive thematic analysis ‘exists at the intersection of the researcher, the dataset and the various contexts of interpretation’. 9(line 5-6) In this method, the coding process is less structured and more organic than in applied thematic analysis. Braun and Clarke have been critical of the use of the term ‘emerging themes’, which many researchers use to indicate that the theme was data-driven, as opposed to a deductive approach:

This language suggests that meaning is self evident and somehow ‘within’ the data waiting to be revealed, and that the researcher is a neutral conduit for the revelation of said meaning. In contrast, we conceptualise analysis as a situated and interactive process, reflecting both the data, the positionality of the researcher, and the context of the research itself… it is disingenuous to evoke a process whereby themes simply emerge, instead of being active co-productions on the part of the researcher, the data/participants and context. 10 (p15)

Since 2006, Braun and Clarke have published extensively on reflexive thematic analysis, including a methodological paper comparing reflexive thematic analysis with other approaches to qualitative analysis, 8 and have provided resources on their website to support researchers and students. 9 There are many ways to conduct reflexive thematic analysis, but the six main steps in the method are outlined following. 9 Note that this is not a linear, prescriptive or rule-based process, but rather an approach to guide researchers in systematically and robustly exploring their data.

1.  Familiarisation with data – involves reading and re-reading transcripts so that the researcher is immersed in the data. The researcher makes notes on their initial observations, interpretations and insights for both the individual transcripts and across all the transcripts or data sources.

2.  Coding – the process of applying succinct labels (codes) to the data in a way that captures the meaning and characteristics of the data relevant to the research question. The entire data set is coded in numerous rounds; however, unlike line-by-line coding in grounded theory (Chapter 27), or data segmentation in applied thematic analysis, not all sections of data need to be coded. 8 After a few rounds of coding, the codes are collated and relevant data is extracted.

3.  Generating initial themes – using the collated codes and extracted data, the researcher identifies patterns of meaning (initial or potential themes). The researcher then revisits codes and the data to extract relevant data for the initial themes, to examine the viability of the theme.

4 .  Developing and reviewing themes – checking the initial themes against codes and the entire data set to assess whether it captures the ‘story’ of the data and addresses the research question. During this step, the themes are often reworked by combining, splitting or discarding. For reflexive thematic analysis, a theme is defined as a ‘pattern of shared meaning underpinned by a central concept or idea’. 8 (p 39 )

5.  Refining, defining and naming themes – developing the scope and boundaries of the theme, creating the story of the theme and applying an informative name for the theme.

6.  Writing up – is a key part of the analysis and involves writing the narrative of the themes, embedding the data and providing the contextual basis for the themes in the literature.

Themes versus c odes

As described above, themes are informed by codes, and themes are defined at a conceptually higher level than codes. Themes are broader categorisations that tend to describe or explain the topic or concept. Themes need to extend beyond the code and are typically statements that can stand alone to describe and/or explain the data. Fereday and Muir-Cochrane explain this development from code to theme in Table 22.2. 11

Table 22.2. Corroborating and legitimating coded themes to identify second-order themes

*Note: This table is from an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

When I [the author] first started publishing qualitative research, many of my themes were at the code level. I then got advice that when the themes are the subheadings of the results section of my paper, they should tell the story of the research. The difference in my theme naming can be seen when comparing a paper from my PhD thesis, 12 which explores the challenges of church-based health promotion, with a more recent paper that I published on antimicrobial stewardship 13 (refer to the theme tables in the publications).

Table 22.3. Examples of thematic analysis

Advantages and challenges of thematic analysis.

Thematic analysis is flexible and can be used to analyse small and large data sets with homogenous and heterogenous samples. Thematic analysis can be applied to any type of data source, from interviews and focus groups to diary entries and online discussion forums. 1 Applied thematic analysis and framework analysis are accessible approaches for non-qualitative researchers or beginner researchers. However, the flexibility and accessibility of thematic analysis can lead to limitations and challenges when thematic analysis is misapplied or done poorly. Thematic analysis can be more descriptive than interpretive if not properly anchored in a theoretical framework. 1 For framework analysis, the spreadsheet matrix output can lead to quantitative researchers inappropriately quantifying the qualitative data. Therefore, training and support from a qualitative researcher with the appropriate expertise can help to ensure that the interpretation of the data is meaningful. 5

Thematic analysis is a family of analysis techniques that are flexible and inductive and involve the generation of codes and themes. There are three main types of thematic analysis: applied thematic analysis, framework analysis and reflexive thematic analysis. These approaches span from structured coding to organic and unstructured coding for theme development. The choice of approach should be guided by the research question, the research design and the available resources and skills of the researcher and team.

• Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol . 2017;12(3):297-298. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Introduction to applied thematic analysis. In: Guest G, MacQueen, K.M., Namey, E.E., ed. Applied thematic analysis . SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/applied-thematic-analysis
• Guest G, MacQueen, K.M., Namey, E.E.,. Themes and Codes. In: Guest G, MacQueen, K.M., Namey, E.E., ed. Applied thematic analysis . SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/applied-thematic-analysis
• Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance . 2009;72(3). Accessed September 14, 2023. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2760705
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol . 2013;13:117. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
• Smith J, Firth J. Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res . 2011;18(2):52-62. doi:10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol . 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Braun V, Clarke V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Couns Psychother Res . 2021;21(1):37-47. doi:10.1002/capr.12360
• Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. University of Auckland. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/
• Braun V, Clarke V. Answers to frequently asked questions about thematic analysis. University of Auckland. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/faqs/
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating Rigour Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods . 2006;5(1):80-92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107
• Ayton D, Manderson L, Smith BJ. Barriers and challenges affecting the contemporary church’s engagement in health promotion. Health Promot J Austr . 2017;28(1):52-58. doi:10.1071/HE15037
• Ayton D, Watson E, Betts JM, et al. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program in the Australian private hospital system: qualitative study of attitudes to antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship. BMC Health Serv Res . 2022;22(1):1554. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08938-8
• McKenna-Plumley PE, Graham-Wisener L, Berry E, Groarke JM. Connection, constraint, and coping: A qualitative study of experiences of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK. PLoS One . 2021;16(10):e0258344. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258344
• Dickinson BL, Gibson K, VanDerKolk K, et al. “It is this very knowledge that makes us doctors”: an applied thematic analysis of how medical students perceive the relevance of biomedical science knowledge to clinical medicine. BMC Med Educ . 2020;20(1):356. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02251-w
• Bunzli S, O’Brien P, Ayton D, et al. Misconceptions and the acceptance of evidence-based nonsurgical interventions for knee osteoarthritis. A Qualitative Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2019;477(9):1975-1983. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000784

Qualitative Research – a practical guide for health and social care researchers and practitioners Copyright © 2023 by Darshini Ayton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

• Translators
• Graphic Designers

Please enter the email address you used for your account. Your sign in information will be sent to your email address after it has been verified.

How to Write a Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data—such as survey responses, interview transcripts, or social media profiles—to identify common themes that come up repeatedly. The data is "coded," or labeled so that similar responses can be grouped together to facilitate further analysis (sticky notes are a must). For example, survey responses about online learning during a pandemic might be coded for "slow internet connection", "frequent interruptions", and "lack of peer interactions."

Thematic analysis is commonly used in psychology research, and is appreciated for its flexibility and ease of use. Despite its widespread use, the steps involved in thematic analysis were not formally described until 2006 . Those published guidelines by Braun and Clarke have been widely adopted, and have over 90,000 estimated citations as of January 2021.

The published guidelines for thematic analysis include six steps:

• Familiarizing yourself with the data
• Generating initial codes
• Searching for themes
• Reviewing themes
• Defining and naming themes
• Producing the report

Braun and Clarke emphasize that researchers must make active choices about their methods of analysis, and must clearly describe their choices and methods in their manuscripts. Otherwise, it is difficult to evaluate the research, and to compare it with other studies. Braun and Clarke come out staunchly against the idea that themes "emerge" from data. Rather, they feel that researchers must actively identify patterns and themes, select those of interest, and report them to readers. By doing so, researchers can analyze qualitative data in a deliberate and rigorous way. Minimally, thematic analysis allows you to organize your data set and describe it in rich detail. Thematic analysis can also allow you to better interpret your research topic.

Things to know before getting started

Some definitions.

• Data corpus: All data collected for a particular research project
• Data set: All data from the corpus that are being used for a particular analysis
• Data item: An individual piece of data collected (e.g. an individual interview)
• Data extract: An individual coded chunk of data (e.g. a quote from an interview)

Questions that should be considered before data is analyzed (or even collected)

• Breadth or depth of coverage? If you aim to provide a description of your entire data set (breadth), some of the nuances within the data will necessarily be lost. However, this can be an effective approach when the topic is now well understood. Alternatively, you can aim to gain a detailed understanding of one or a few specific aspects of your data (depth).
• Inductive or deductive approach to thematic analysis? Adopting an inductive approach means that you will allow your research question to evolve as you analyze and code the data. A deductive approach (also called a theoretical thematic analysis) involves coding the data with a specific research question in mind .
• Semantic or latent approach? A semantic approach involves identifying themes based entirely on the words used by the participants (e.g. in a survey, interview, website, etc.). Once the data is coded, organized, and described, the researcher can provide further interpretation. Alternatively, a latent approach allows the researcher to code data items based on what the item reveals about a participant's underlying ideas, patterns, and assumptions.

Let's now consider the six steps of thematic analysis.

Step 1: Familiarizing yourself with your data

Before you can effectively code your data, you must become intimately familiar with it. Immerse yourself in the entire data set by actively reading through it at least once, searching for meanings, possible patterns, etc. Importantly, you should read with an open mind, and not just search for data that support your hypothesis or assumptions. This process of actively reading and re-reading the data is time consuming, but is the foundation for any meaningful interpretation of it.

Verbal data (e.g., interviews, recorded presentations, etc.) need to be transcribed in order to be used for thematic analysis. Transcribing data is an excellent way to become familiar with it. The act of transcription should be considered an interpretive act, especially for spontaneous responses (e.g., an interview compared to a recorded presentation). The simple placement of punctuation marks can dramatically alter the meaning of words (e.g., "Let's eat Bob" is very different from "Let's eat, Bob"). If you are provided with data that has already been transcribed, you should check the transcription against the original recording to ensure its accuracy. Listening to the original recording will also improve your understanding of the data.

As you familiarize yourself with your data, you can start to better focus your research question, and jot down ideas for coding. The process of coding, and improving your codes to better address your research question, will continue through the entire analysis.

Step 2: Generating initial codes

Codes identify a portion of the data of potential interest to the researcher. The relevant text is highlighted and labeled with a "code" that is short and descriptive. For example, survey responses about online learning during a pandemic might be coded for "frequent interruptions" when the text includes a mention of being interrupted by family members, the doorbell, internet lapses, etc.

Coding can be done manually (with highlighters, colored pens, sticky notes, etc.), or on a computer. You need to work systematically through your entire data set, giving equal attention to each data item, whether or not it supports your hypothesis. Add new codes as necessary (e.g. "slow internet connection" and "lack of peer interactions"). It is better to add a code that might not be helpful, than to go back to your data to add it later. An individual section of text might remain uncoded (e.g. if unrelated to your research question about online learning), coded once (e.g. for "frequent interruptions" from family members), or coded multiple times (e.g. for "frequent interruptions" due to "slow internet connection"). As you work through your data, you may find you need to combine or subdivide your codes (e.g. add a new code for "interruption by sibling").

You are summarizing your data with these codes, so be thorough in your work.

Step 3: Searching for themes

Once you have completed the initial coding of your data, you can organize your data into groups. Include the relevant text, not just the code, to facilitate searching for themes. Consider how different codes may contribute to an overarching theme. For example, you may find that the codes "slow internet connection", "financial stress", and "no help with schoolwork" commonly occur together. You might then choose to place these codes within a larger theme of "low-income students face additional challenges with online learning." You might consider adding "financial stress" as a sub-theme. The code "lack of peer interactions" might fit within a larger theme of "mental health stressors." Some codes may occur too infrequently to be included, may be too vague, or may not be relevant to your evolving research question.

This step provides candidate themes that will need to be refined, so don't exclude any data or possibilities just yet. In the next step, reviewing all the data extracts will help you determine how the themes might need to be combined, separated, or discarded.

Step 4: Reviewing themes

Now that you have a set of candidate themes, you need to revise them to accurately reflect your data and your research question. This may involve eliminating themes that are not well supported, creating new themes, combining closely related themes, and dividing overly broad themes into multiple themes.

You will need to review your data at two levels. First, you should review the coded data extracts for each theme, and determine whether they are sufficiently coherent. Problems may occur if the theme itself is problematic, or if some of the data extracts do not fit within their theme. You may need to rework the theme, re-code some data to create finer divisions, or remove a code from a theme.

Next, you need to evaluate whether your themes accurately reflect your entire data set. You should re-read your entire data set to determine whether your themes fit the data set, and to code any relevant data that may have been missed in earlier rounds of coding.

Step 5: Defining and naming themes

Formulate exactly what you mean by each theme, and examine how it helps one understand your data. Devise a concise and informative name for each theme. Take the data extracts for each theme, organize them so that they are easy to follow, and add an accompanying narrative to explain why the data are interesting and how they support the theme.

Step 6: Producing the report

At this point, you should have produced quite a bit of writing as you have moved through steps 1 through 5. You should have your coded data extracts, your themes, and some narrative explaining how your data support your themes. For your final report, you should organize this information according to the guidelines of your graduate program or target journal, and write a compelling story that convinces the reader of the validity of your analysis. Choose examples from your data that clearly and memorably illustrate your main points. Go beyond presenting your data, and make an argument that could influence policy, or serve as the basis for future studies.

Related Posts

The Peer Review Process: 5 Things You Need to Know Before You Get Started

How To Cite a Tweet

• Academic Writing Advice
• All Blog Posts
• Writing Advice
• Admissions Writing Advice
• Book Writing Advice
• Short Story Advice
• Employment Writing Advice
• Business Writing Advice
• Web Content Advice
• Article Writing Advice
• Magazine Writing Advice
• Grammar Advice
• Dialect Advice
• Editing Advice
• Freelance Advice
• Legal Writing Advice
• Poetry Advice
• Graphic Design Advice
• Logo Design Advice
• Translation Advice
• Blog Reviews
• Short Story Award Winners
• Scholarship Winners

Need an academic editor before submitting your work?

Student Examples of Good Practice

Sometimes it’s good to know what ‘doing a good job’ looks like… To help those wanting to understand what describing the reflexive TA process well might look like, we offer some good examples here, from student projects. This may be particularly helpful for students doing research projects, and for people very well-trained in positivism.

As well as the example(s) we provide here, you can find a much more detailed discussion in our book Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide (SAGE, 2022).

Suzy Anderson (Professional Doctorate)

The following sections are by Suzy Anderson, from her UWE Counselling Psychology Professional Doctorate thesis – The Problem with Picking: Permittance, Escape and Shame in Problematic Skin Picking.

An example of a description of the thematic analysis process:

Process of Coding and Developing Themes

Coding and analysis were guided by Braun and Clarke’s (2006, 2013) guidelines for using thematic analysis. Each stage of the coding and theme development process described below was clearly documented ensuring that the evolution of themes was clear and traceable. This helped to ensure research rigour and means that process and dependability may be demonstrable.

I familiarised myself with the data by reading the transcripts several times while making rough notes. As data collection took place over a protracted period of time, coding of transcribed interviews began before the full dataset was available. Transcripts were read line-by-line and initial codes were written in a column alongside the transcripts. These codes were refined and added to as interviews were revisited over time. Throughout this process I was careful to note and re-read areas of relatively sparse coding to ensure they were not neglected. My supervisor also independently coded three of the interviews for purposes of reflexivity, providing an interesting alternative standpoint. I cross-referenced our two perspectives to notice and reflect on our differences of perspective.

Once initial coding was complete, I looked for larger patterns across the dataset and grouped the codes into themes (Braun & Clarke, 2006). I found it helpful to think of the theme titles as spoken in the first person, and imagine participants saying them, to check whether they reflected the dataset and participants’ meanings. I tried not to have my coding and themes steered by ideas, categories and definitions from previous research, to allow a more inductive, data-driven approach, while recognising my role as researcher in co-creation of themes (Braun & Clarke, 2013). However, there were times when the language of previous research appeared a good fit, such as in the discussion of ‘automatic’ and ‘focussed’ picking. Given that the experience of SP is an under-researched area, particularly from a qualitative perspective, and that the aim is for this study to contribute to therapeutic developments, themes were developed with the entire dataset in mind (Braun & Clarke, 2006), such that they would more likely be relevant to someone presenting in therapy for help with SP. There was clear heterogeneity in the interviews, and in cases where I have taken a narrower perspective on an experience (such as when describing an experience only true for some of the participants), I have tried to give a loose indication of prevalence and alternative views.

I created a large ‘directory’ of themes and smaller sub-themes, with the relevant participant quotations filed under each theme or sub-theme heading. This helped me to adjust theme titles, boundaries and position, meant that I could check that themes were faithful to the data at a glance, and was of practical help when writing the analysis.

The process of coding and developing themes was intended to have both descriptive and interpretive elements (using Braun & Clarke’s definitions, 2013). The descriptive element was intended to represent what participants said, while the interpretative element drew on my subjectivity to consider less directly evident patterns, such as those that might be influenced by social context or forces such as shame. This interpretation was of particular value to the current study as participants often struggled to find words for their experience and several reported or implied that they did not understanding the mechanisms of their picking. An interpretative stance meant that I could develop ideas about what they were able to describe and consider the relationships between these experiences, making sense of them alongside previous literature (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Writing was considered an integral part of the analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2013) and it helped me to adjust the boundaries of themes, notice more latent patterns and considered how themes and their content were related.

Given the known heterogeneity of picking I was keen to make sure my analysis did not become skewed towards one type of SP experience to the detriment of another. I actively looked for participant experiences that diverged from those of the developing themes (with similar intentions to a ‘deviant case analysis’; Lincoln & Guba, 1985) so that the final analysis would represent themes in context and with balance. When adding quotations to the prose of my analysis I re-read them in their original context to ensure that my representation of their words appeared to be a credible reflection of what was said.

An example of researcher reflexivity in relation to analysis process

Subjectivity as a Resource

I considered my subjectivity to be a resource when conducting interviews and analysing data (Gough & Madill, 2012). It guided my judgement when interviewing, helping me to respond to participants’ explicit, implicit and more verbally concealed distress. I allowed aspects of my own experience to resonate with those of participants meaning that I could listen to their stories with empathy and a genuine curiosity. During analysis, themes were actively created and categorised, demanding my use of self (DeSantis & Ugarriza, 2000). I sought to interpret the data rather than simply describe it, which necessarily requires acknowledgement of both researcher and participant subjectivity. I strongly feel that we can only make sense of another’s story by relating it to our own phenomenology (Smith & Shinebourne, 2012), and that we re-construct their stories on frameworks formed by our own subjective experience. As such it is useful to be aware of my personal experiences and assumptions.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.

DeSantis, L., & Ugarriza, D. N. (2000). The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22 (3), 351-372.

Gough, B., & Madill, A. (2012). Subjectivity in psychological research: From problem to prospect. Psychological Methods, 17 (3), 374-384.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry, 289 (331), 289-327.

Smith, J. A., & Shinebourne, P. (2012). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.),  APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (p. 73–82). American Psychological Association.

Gina Broom (Research Master's)

The following extract is by Gina Broom, from her University of Auckland Master’s thesis (2020): “Oh my god, this might actually be cheating”: Experiencing attractions or feelings for others in committed relationships .

A detailed description of reflexive TA analytic approach and process

I analysed data through a process of reflexive thematic analysis (reflexive TA), as outlined by Braun, Clarke, Hayfield, and Terry (2019), who describe reflexive TA as a method by which a researcher will “explore and develop an understanding of patterned meaning across the dataset” with the aim of producing “a coherent and compelling interpretation of the data, grounded in the data” (p. 848). I utilized Braun and colleagues’ reflexive approach to TA, as opposed to alternative models of TA, due to my alignment with critical qualitative research. I did not select a c oding reliability TA approach, for example, due to its foundation of (post)positivist assumptions and processes (such as predetermined hypotheses, the aim of discovering ‘accurate’ themes or “domain summaries”, and efforts to ‘remove’ researcher bias while evidencing reliability/replicability), which were not suitable for the critical realist epistemology underpinning this thesis. In contrast, Reflexive TA is a ‘Big Q’ qualitative approach, constructing patterns of meaning as an ‘output’ from the data (rather than as predetermined domain summaries) while valuing “researcher subjectivity as not just valid but a resource” (Braun et al., 2019, p. 848). As the critical realist and feminist approaches of this thesis theorize knowledge as contextual, subjective, and partial, with reflexivity valued as a crucial process, a reflexive TA was the most appropriate method for this analysis.

Braun and colleagues’ (2019) reflexive TA process involves six-phases, including familiarization with the data, generating codes, constructing themes, revising and defining themes, and producing the report of the analysis. I outline my process for each of these below:

Phase 1, familiarization: Much of my initial engagement with the data was done through my transcription of the interviews, as the process provided extended time with each interview, both listening to the audio of the participant, and in the writing of the transcript. Some qualitative researchers describe transcription as an essential process for a researcher to perform themselves, as “transcribing discourse, like photographing reality, is an interpretive practice” (Riessman, 1993, p. 13), and as a result, “analysis begins during transcription” (Bird, 2005, p. 230). Braun and Clarke (2012) suggest certain questions to consider during the process of familiarization: “How does this participant make sense of their experiences? What assumptions do they make in interpreting their experience? What kind of world is revealed through their accounts?” (p. 61). During transcription, I took notes of potential points of interest for the analysis, using these types of questions as a guide. In exploring attractions or feelings for others in committed relationships, these questions (and my notes) often related to the meaning participants applied to their feelings and relationships, particularly in terms of morality and social acceptability, while the ‘world’ of their accounts was conveyed through their discourse of the contemporary relational context.

Phase 2, generating initial codes : Following transcription, I systematically coded each interview, searching for instances of talk that produced snippets of meaning relevant to the topic of attractions or feelings for others. I coded interviews using the ‘comment’ feature in the Microsoft Word document of each transcript, highlighting the relevant text excerpt for each code comment. I used this approach, rather than working ‘on paper’, so that I would later be able to easily export my coded excerpts for use in my theme construction. The coding of thematic analysis can be either an inductive ‘bottom up’ approach, or a deductive or theoretical ‘top down’ approach, or a combination of the two, depending on the extent to which the analysis is driven by the content of the data, and the extent to which theoretical perspectives drive the analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006, 2013). Coding can also be semantic , where codes capture “explicit meaning, close to participant language”, or latent , where codes “focus on a deeper, more implicit or conceptual level of meaning” (Braun et al., 2019, p. 853). I used an inductive approach due to the need for exploratory research on experiences attractions or feelings for others, as it is a relatively new topic without an existing theoretical foundation. The focus of my coding therefore developed throughout the process of engaging with the data, focusing on segments of participants’ meaning-making in relation to general, personal, or partner-centred experiences of: attractions or feelings for others in the contemporary relational context, implied moral and/or social acceptability (or unacceptability), related affective experiences and responses, and enacted or recommended management of attractions or feelings for others. At the beginning of the process, I mostly noted semantic codes such as ‘feels guilty about attractions or feelings for others’, particularly as my coding was exploratory and inductive, rather than guided by a knowledge of ‘deeper’ contextual meaning. As I progressed, however, I began to notice and code for more latent meanings, such as ‘love = effortless emotional exclusivity’ or ‘monogamy compulsory/unspoken relationship default’. When all interviews had been systematically and thoroughly coded (and when highly similar codes had been condensed into single codes), I had a final list of roughly 200 codes to take into the next phase of analysis.

Phase 3, constructing themes : When developing my initial candidate themes, I utilized the approach described by Braun and colleagues (2019) as “using codes as building blocks”, sorting my codes into topic areas or “clusters of meaning” (p. 855) with bullet-point lists in Microsoft Word. From this grouping of codes, I produced and refined a set of candidate themes through visual mapping and continuous engagement with the data. These candidate themes were grouped into two overarching themes: the first encompassed 2 themes and 6 sub-themes evidencing pervasive ‘traditional’ conceptions of committed relationships (as monogamous by default with an assumption of emotionally exclusivity), and the way attractions or feelings for others were positioned as an unexpected threat within this context; the second encompassed four themes and eight sub-themes exploring modern contradictions (which problematized the quality of the relationship or the ‘maturity’ of those within it, rather than the attractions or feelings), and the way attractions or feelings for others were positioned as ‘only natural’ or even positive agents of change. This process of candidate theme development was still explorative and inductive, as I worked closely with the coded data and had only brief engagement with potentially relevant theoretical literature at this stage. Further engagement with contextually relevant literature, and a deductive integration of it into the analysis, was developed in the next phases.

Phases 4 and 5, revising and defining themes : My process of revising and defining themes started by using a macro (that was developed for this project) to export all of my initial codes and their associated excerpts into a single master sheet in Microsoft Excel, with columns indicating the source interview for each excerpt, as well as relevant participant demographic information (e.g. age, gender, relationship as monogamous or non-monogamous). This master sheet contained 6006 coded excerpts. In two new columns (one for themes and one for sub-themes), I ‘tagged’ excerpts relevant to my candidate analysis by writing the themes and/or sub-themes that they fit into. I was then able to export these excerpts, using the macro designed for this project, sorting the relevant data for each theme and sub-theme into separate tabs. I then reviewed all the excerpts for each individual theme and sub-theme, which allowed me to revise and define my candidate themes into my first full thematic analysis for the writing phase.

The thematic analysis at this stage included 13 themes and seven sub-themes, and these differed from the original candidate themes in a number of ways. In reviewing the collated data, I noted that some sub-themes were nuanced and prominent enough to be promoted to themes; the sub-theme ‘stay or go? (partner or other)’, for example, became the theme ‘you have to choose’. Similarly, I found other themes or sub-themes to be ‘thin’, and either removed them, or integrated them into other parts of the analysis; the sub-theme roughly titled ‘families at stake (marriage, children)’, for example, became a smaller part of the ‘safety in exclusivity’ theme. I also noted that the first overarching theme in the candidate analysis was ‘messy’, and in an effort to improve focus and clarity, I split this first overarching theme into three new ones, each with its own “central organizing concept” (Braun et al., 2019, p. 48): the first evidenced the contemporary relational context as one of default monogamy with an idealization of exclusivity; the second evidenced infidelity as an unforgivable offence, while associating attractions or feelings for others with this threat of infidelity; the third evidenced discourses in which someone must be to blame (either the person with the feelings or their partner). The second half of the candidate analysis became a fourth and final overarching theme, which encompassed a revised list of themes evidencing favourable talk of attractions or feelings for others.

Phase 6, writing the report : In writing my first draft of my analysis, I developed an even deeper sense of which themes and sub-themes were ‘falling into place’, and which did not fit so well with the overall analysis. At this point I was also engaging in a deeper exploration of relevant literature, and writing my chapter on the context of sexuality and relationships, which provided a foundation of theoretical knowledge that I could deductively integrate into my analysis. Through a process of supervisor feedback on my initial draft, engagement with literature, and revision of the data, I developed the analysis into the final thematic structure. My initial research question of ‘how do people make sense of attractions or feelings for others in committed relationships?’ also developed into three final research questions, each of which is explored across the three overarching themes of the final analysis:

Upon revision, both of the first two overarching themes from the second (revised) thematic map (‘the safety of default monogamy’ and ‘the danger of infidelity’) involved themes and sub-themes which situated attractions or feelings for others within the dominant contemporary relational context. I combined relevant parts of these into one overarching theme in the final analysis, which explored the research question: What is the contemporary relational context, and how are attractions or feelings for others made sense of within that context? Two themes and five sub-themes together evidenced attractions or feelings for others as a threat (by association with infidelity) within the mononormative sociocultural context.

The third overarching theme from the second (revised) thematic map (‘there’s gotta be someone to blame’) did not require much revision to fit with the final analysis. I refined information that was too similar or redundant in the original analysis, such as the sub-themes ‘partner is flawed’ and ‘deficit in partner’ which were combined into one sub-theme. I also added a third theme, ‘the relationship was wrong’, from a later part of the original analysis, as this also fit with the central organizing concept of wrongness and accountability. Together, these three themes and two sub-themes formed the second overarching theme of the final analysis, exploring the question: What accountabilities are at stake with attractions or feelings for others in committed relationships? This chapter also explores the affective consequences of these attributed accountabilities, as described by participants and interpreted by myself as researcher.

I revised and developed the final overarching theme most, in contrast to the analysis previously done, as my process of writing, feedback, and revision demonstrated that this section was the least coherent, and the central organizing concept required development. There were various themes and sub-themes across the initial analysis that explored imperatives or choices that were either made or recommended by participants. These parts of the original analysis were combined to produce the third overarching theme of the final analysis, including four (contradictory) themes and four sub-themes exploring the research question: How do people navigate, or recommend navigating, attractions or feelings for others?.

Combined, these three final overarching themes tell a story of (dominant or ‘normative’) initial sense making of attractions or feelings for others, subsequent attributions of accountability, and various (often contradictory and moralized) ways these feelings are navigated. Braun and Clarke (2006) describe thematic analysis as an active production of knowledge by the researcher, as themes aren’t ‘discovered’ or a pre-existing form of knowledge that will ‘emerge’, but rather patterns that a researcher identifies through their perspective of the data. My thematic analysis was influenced by my own social context, experiences, and theoretical positioning. In the context of critical research, ethical considerations are often complex, and researcher reflexivity is a crucial part of the process (Bott, 2010; L. Finlay, 2002; Lafrance & Wigginton, 2019; Mauthner & Doucet, 2003; Price, 1996; Teo, 2019; Weatherall et al., 2002). As the theoretical foundation of this thematic analysis was a combination of critical realism and critical feminist psychology, I engaged in an ongoing consideration of ethics and reflexivity throughout my data collection and analysis, which I discuss in the following section.

Bird, C. M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative Inquiry , 11 (2), 226–248.

Bott, E. (2010). Favourites and others: Reflexivity and the shaping of subjectivities and data in qualitative research. Qualitative Research , 10 (2), 159–173.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology , 3 (2), 77–101.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology (Vol. 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, pp. 57-71). APA books.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners . Sage.

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 843-860). Springer.

Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research , 12 (4), 531–545.

Lafrance, M. N., & Wigginton, B. (2019). Doing critical feminist research: A Feminism & Psychology reader. Feminism & Psychology , 29 (4), 534–552.

Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology , 37 (3), 413–431.

Price, J. (1996). Snakes in the swamp: Ethical issues in qualitative research. In R. Josselson (Ed.), Ethics and Process in the Narrative Study of Lives (pp. 207–215). Sage.

Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis . Sage.

Teo, T. (2019). Beyond reflexivity in theoretical psychology: From philosophy to the psychological humanities. In T. Teo (Ed.), Re-envisioning Theoretical Psychology (pp. 273–288). Palgrave Macmillan.

Weatherall, A., Gavey, N., & Potts, A. (2002). So whose words are they anyway? Feminism & Psychology , 12 (4), 531–539.

Lucie Wheeler (Professional Doctorate)

The following sections are by Lucie Wheeler, from her UWE Counselling Psychology Professional Doctorate thesis – “It’s such a hard and lonely journey”: Women’s experiences of perinatal loss and the subsequent pregnancy .

Data from the qualitative surveys and interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis within a contextualist approach, as this allows the flexibility of combining multiple sources of data (Braun & Clarke, 2006; 2020). Both forms of data provided accounts of perinatal experiences, and therefore were considered as one whole data set throughout analysis, rather than analysed separately. The inclusion of data from different perspectives, by not limiting the type of perinatal loss experienced, and offering multiple ways to engage with the research, allowed a rich understanding of the experiences being studied (Polkinghorne, 2005). However, despite the data providing a rich and complex picture of the participants’ experiences, I acknowledge that any understanding that has developed though this analysis can only ever be partial, and therefore does not aim to completely capture the phenomenon under scrutiny (Tracy, 2010). An inductive approach was taken to analysis, working with the data from the bottom-up (Braun & Clarke, 2013), exploring the perspectives of the participants, whilst also examining the contexts from which the data were produced. Through the analysis I sought to identify patterns across the data in order to tell a story about the journey through loss and the next pregnancy. The six phases of Braun and Clarke’s (2006; 2020) reflexive thematic analysis were used through an iterative process, in the following ways:

Phase 1 – Data familiarisation and writing familiarisation notes:

By conducting every aspect of the data collection myself, from developing the interview schedule and survey questions, to carrying out the face-to-face interviews, and then transcribing them, I was immersed in the data from the outset. Particularly for the interviews, the experience allowed me to engage with participants, build rapport, explore their stories with them, and then listen to each interview multiple times through the transcription process. I therefore felt familiar with the interview data before actively engaging with analysis. I found the process of transcribing the interviews a particularly useful way to engage with the data, as it slowed the interview process down, with a need to take in every word, and therefore led me to notice things that hadn’t been apparent when carrying out the interviews. The surveys, as well as the interview transcripts, were read through several times. I used a reflective journal throughout this process to makes notes about anything that came to mind during data collection and transcription. This included personal reflections, what the data had reminded me of, led me to think about, as well as what I noticed about the participant and the way in which they framed their experiences.

Phase 2 – Systematic data coding:

Coding of the data was done initially for the interviews, and then for the survey responses. I began by going line by line through each transcript, paying equal attention to each part of the data, and applying codes to anything identified as meaningful. The majority of coding was semantic, sticking closely to the participants’ understanding of their own experiences, however, as the process developed, and each transcript was re-visited, some latent coding was applied, that sought to look below the surface level meaning of what participants had said. Again, throughout this process, a reflective journal was used in order to make notes about my own experience of the data, to capture anything I felt may be drawing on my own experience, and to reflect on what I was being drawn to in the data.

Due to the quantity of data (over 70,000 words in the transcripts, and over 23,000 words of survey responses), this was a slow process, and required repeatedly stepping away from the data and coming back to it in a different frame of mind, reviewing data items in a different order, and discussions with peers and supervisors in the process. I noticed that my coding tended to be longer phrases, rather than one-to-two words, as it felt important to maintain some element of context for the codes, particularly as the stories being told had a sense of chronology to them, that seemed related to the way in which experiences were understood. The codes were then collated into a Word document. Writing up the codes in this way separately to the data, it was important to ensure that the codes captured meaning in a way that could be understood in isolation. Therefore, the wording of some of the codes was developed further at this stage. During the coding process I began to notice a number of patterns in the data, so alongside coding, I also developed some rough diagrams of ideas that could later be used in the development of thematic maps.

Phase 3: Generating initial themes from coded and collated data:

The process of generating themes from the data was initially a process of collating the codes from both the interviews and the surveys, and organising them in a way that reflected some of the commonality in what participants had expressed. Despite each of the participants having a unique story to tell, with details specific to their personal context, there was also commonality found in these experiences. Through reflecting on the codes themselves, going back to the data, and using notes and diagrams that had been made throughout the process in my reflective journal, I began to further develop ideas about the patterns that I had developed from the data. Related codes were collated, and developed into potential theme and sub theme ideas. I used thematic maps to develop my thinking, and changed these as my understanding of the data developed. I was conscious that in the development of codes and theme ideas, I wanted to ensure that my analysis was firmly grounded in the data, and therefore, repeatedly returned to the raw data during this process. The use of my reflective notes was also vital at this stage, to ensure that I did not become too fixated on limited ways of seeing the data, but was able to remain open and willing to let initial ideas go.

Phase 4: Developing and reviewing themes:

Theme development was an iterative process of going back and fore between the codes, and the way that patterns had been identified, and the data, collating quotes to illustrate ideas. A number of thematic maps were created that aimed to illustrate the way in which participants made sense of their experiences across the data set, including identifying areas of contradiction and overlap. The use of thematic maps was particularly useful as a visual tool of the way in which different ideas and patterns were connected and related.

Phase 5: Refining, defining and naming themes:

Through the process of developing thematic maps, areas of overlap became evident, which led to further refinement of ideas. There were many possible ways in which the data could be described, and therefore defining and articulating ideas to colleagues and supervisors brought helpful clarity about what could be defined as a theme, where related ideas fitted together into sub themes, and also where separation of ideas was necessary. The theme names were developed once there were clear differences between ideas, and with the use of participants’ quotes where appropriate, in order to keep close links between the themes and the data itself.

Phase 6: Writing the report:

Writing up each theme required further clarity as I sought to articulate ideas, and illustrate these through multiple participant quotes. The process of writing a theme report required further refinement of ideas, and rather than just a final part of the process, still required the iterative process of revisiting earlier phases to ensure that the ideas being presented closely represented the data whilst meeting the research aims. At this stage links were also made to existing literature in order to expand upon patterns identified in the data. Referring to relevant existing literature also helped me to further question my interpretation of the data, and to expand upon my understanding of the participants’ experiences.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners . London: SAGE.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology , 1-25. [online first]

Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52 (2), 137-145.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16 (10), 837.