free essay editors

Free online proofreading and essay editor

A reliable proofreading tool and essay editor for any writer or student, a complete environment.

Typely is more than just a proofreading tool. It's a complete writing environment.

Thousands of checks

More than a thousand checks are being performed and we've only scratched the surface.

Inspired by the greatest writers

Gain access to humanity’s collective understanding about the craft of writing.

A proofreading tool that does not bark at every tree

Typely is precise. Existing tools for proofreading raise so many false alarms that their advice cannot be trusted. Instead, the writer must carefully consider whether to accept or reject each change.

We aim for a tool so precise that it becomes possible to unquestioningly adopt its recommendations and still come out ahead — with stronger, tighter prose. Better to be quiet and authoritative than loud and unreliable.

Relax, focus, write your next masterpiece...

Writing presumes more than simply laying out words on a paper. Typely helps you get in the mood and keeps you focused, immersed and ready to write your story.

Whether you need a distraction-free environment, some chill relaxing sounds or a pomodoro timer to manage your time we got you covered.

Got questions? We have answers.

No. Typely is completely free and we plan on keeping it that way. We are considering some advanced features however that might be available under a premium plan.

The only limit we have applied thus far is on the number of characters you can submit and that is being set at a maximum of 50,000.

In theory yes but that will require a lot of work and professionals dedicated for this job. We are considering a way of letting the community participate somehow.

Typely does not do grammar checking because it's hard and almost impossible to get right. The aim for Typely is to be precise and reliable.

Slick Write

Check your grammar in seconds.

Slick Write is a powerful, free application that makes it easy to check your writing for grammar errors, potential stylistic mistakes, and other features of interest. Whether you're a blogger, novelist, SEO professional, or student writing an essay for school, Slick Write can help take your writing to the next level. Curious? See why Slick Write is the best. Try the interactive demo , or check your own document . No software download or installation is required.

Why Slick Write?

The grammar checker is lightning fast

Customizable feedback to suit your style

We do not redistribute your documents

Add impact to reports

Improve your grades

Engage your audience

Inspire confidence

English is a difficult language, so using correct grammar and diverse vocabulary will set you apart from the crowd. Using good sentence structure and wording improves your content's impact and readability while building your readers' trust. Slick Write goes beyond spell checking to teach you the habits of effective writers. How does your writing rate?

Improve your resumé

The job market is competitive. Gain an advantage, impress employers, and land more interviews by demonstrating professionalism and superior communication skills on your resumé.

Get the extensions

Using an extension is the easiest way to submit your work to Slick Write. They are available for Chrome and Firefox .

Bust your writer's block, and create new metaphors by playing the word association game . To begin, type a word or phrase in the box below, and hit enter. To quickly find associations for your own text, highlight a word or phrase in it, and use the toolbox popup.

The associator learns contextual word associations from real literature, so it may return offensive results.

Results for:

I know what I'm doing. Disable these hints.

Submission Limit There is a limit of 200,000 characters, which is approximately 30,000 words. Anything longer should be submitted in smaller chunks, or it will be automatically trimmed.
No document It looks like you forgot to enter your document. Paste it in and try again.
Structure This tab shows sentence structure within the context of the document. Hover over a sentence to see its word count. Select a word or phrase, or click a sentence to get more information.
Quotes This tab shows your quotations highlighted as Slick Write sees them.

More information »

Sentence type flow Pieces with good flow will make use of all four sentence types, varying them to keep the reader interested.
Sentence length flow Sentence length is indirectly related to sentence type, and is a good indicator of flow. Flow can be altered by adding, removing, lengthening, shortening, combining, or splitting sentences. Long sentences will be indicated by a red line on the graph. Sentences that flow poorly with their surroundings will be orange, and the source of the problem can often be found in a nearby sentence.
Word length flow Word length is a minor contributor to overall flow, but even minor variations are signs of good rhythm.
Passive Voice Index This is a measure of how frequently the passive voice is used. Consider revising your document if it scores over 100.
Prepositional Phrase Index This is a measure of how frequently prepositional phrases are used. Consider revising your document if it scores over 100.
Average sentence length Sentence length is a major contributor to the level of education required to read a body of text.
Sentence length standard deviation This is a measure of the amount of variation in the length of a text's sentences. In texts that have broad appeal, this tends to fall between 50 and 90% of the average sentence length. You can increase this number by making long sentences longer, and short ones shorter.
Sentence deviation to length ratio This is a measure of the sentence variety, and a major contributor to flow. Most novels score between 0.5 and 0.9, and popular ones often score near the high end of the range. You can increase this number by making long sentences longer, and short ones shorter.
Just the stats preset Use this preset when you're only interested in the stats tab. Critique and Flow will be hidden.
Honesty preset This preset checks for common indicators of deception, either by lying or omission, and is based on the findings of this study . Areas with high concentrations of these indicators should be viewed with skepticism. Note that the presence or absence of these indicators does not guarantee that a statement is true or false, and that the study was done on spoken communications, so it might be more applicable to interviews and speeches. As always, use your brain.
Doubled words A word used twice in a row may be a typo.
Commonly confused words This will check for the internet's most frequently confused words and notify you if it looks like you misused one. It is experimental and probably the least reliable feature. Consult a dictionary when necessary.
Sentences starting with the same word A word should not be used to start more than one sentence in a single paragraph.
Misplaced conjunctions It is considered poor style to place coordinating conjunctions at either end of a sentence. Placing a subordinating conjunction at the end of a sentence is against the rules.

It is said that one day, passive voice will bring weakness to your prose.

More information » Even more information »

Overwriting Words like "very" and "really" make sentences wordier and weaken your message. These can be deleted in almost all cases without affecting the meaning of the sentence.
Abstract words Abstract words lack specificity and overusing them can make even simple concepts difficult to understand. There are times when abstract words are desirable or even necessary; it would be difficult to write about math or programming without mentioning variables or functions, but you should use more specific terms whenever possible.
Wordy and redundant phrases These phrases make your writing more difficult to understand. In most cases, they can be replaced with one or two words, or even deleted.
Legalese These antiquated, arcane words and phrases will make your writing look like a contract.
Double negatives Double negatives are almost always poor style.
Adverbs They aren't bad in small quantities, but consider revising your document if more than 5.5% of its words are adverbs. Adverbs ending in "-ly" are considered the worst offenders.
Adjectives They aren't bad in small quantities. A few of the words on this list can also function as other parts of speech. You have been warned.
Contractions In formal writing, the use of contractions is considered a fault.

The boxer decked his opponent.

Profanity Profanity should not be used in formal writing outside of direct quotations.

The critic's scathing review hit the nail on the head .

Similes Similes and metaphors should be used sparingly. This option will detect most common types of similes.
"Said" replacements Some people think that these substitutes for "said" are weak or obnoxious, especially if overused.

Her dress was long , and it touched the floor.

Her long dress touched the floor.

Gender-specific pronouns Avoid using gender-specific pronouns in formal writing when the subject's gender is unknown.
Weasel words Like abstract words, weasel words and phrases lack specificity. At best, they convey uncertainty. At worst, they can be used to "weasel out" of telling the truth in a straightforward manner. When checking a document that is speculative by nature, you might want to disable this detector.
Third person pronouns According to this study , high concentrations of third person pronouns may indicate deception.
Bias language These words and phrases often show the author's bias.
Uncommon words Uncommon words will increase the document's reading difficulty.

Hot peppers burn my mouth, but I eat them anyway .

Since burritos taste good , I like to eat them.

Sentence fragments A sentence must have at least one noun and one verb. Anything that does not is a fragment, and if it occurs outside of dialog, it should probably be rewritten.
Long sentences Long sentences tend to be more difficult to read, making them good candidates for trimming or splitting. Alternatively, parallelism may be used to improve their readability, though this will not decrease the ARI score.
Success with Style: Using Writing Style to Predict the Success of Novels
Grammar Girl For your obscure writing questions
Basic Prose and Style Mechanics An excellent, concise resource
Television Tropes & Idioms Tricks of the trade
Writing Realistic Injuries An invaluable article for anyone who writes action or horror
Online Etymology Dictionary Learn the history of English words
Scribophile Discuss the finer points of writing with other novelists
Suggestions from the official See Sharp Press blog Learn about the mistakes that will keep your novel from being published.
Smashwords Easy ebook distribution for indie authors
Duotrope Find and learn about publishers
CreateSpace
Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing
Creative Writing Prompts and Exercises Spark your creativity
RhymeZone A popular rhyming dictionary
Seventh Sanctum Name generators and more
Apache OpenOffice The best free office software
Literature & Latte Makers of the popular Scrivener editor

Did you find a bug? Do you want us to add a new feature? We would love to hear about it.

🌟 New Update: As of JAN 30, 2024, Experience enhanced grammar and punctuation detection! 🚀

Your Go-To Free Essay Checker for an Easy A+

Max 5000 Words is allowed.

Probability Score

Plagiarized

Why do i need an essay checker.

You’ve spent countless hours researching and writing your essay. The last thing you want is to spend more hours correcting it. Grammar Lookup can help you with that by correcting every grammatical mistake in your essays and papers, removing all the plagiarism, and making it sound human.

Our tool uses advanced AI technology to efficiently check your essays for grammatical errors, AI content, and plagiarism. The result? Essays that are ready to impress your professor and help you get good grades.

How Will Grammar Lookup Check My Essay?

Our essay checker can help you by:

How Does the Essay Checker Detect Grammatical Mistakes?

Why It’s Outstanding

Good grades come from good writing, and Grammar Lookup’s college essay checker is what you need to:

Which Types of Essays Does Grammar Lookup’s Essay Checker Correct?

Our Essay Checker has Helped 5000+ Students Graduate

Use Grammar Lookup’s free essay checker and get an A+ on every essay you write.

CTA: Improve Your Essay

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):

Want to see it in action? Load a sample essay from our essay database .

Readability

Explanation: Adverbs are used to modify verbs, but are often overused.

Try replacing adverbs with a strong verb instead. For example: quickly ran → sprinted .

Explanation: Too many qualifiers can make your writing seem unsure or lazily written.

For example: avoid phrases like " I think ...", and replace phrases like " really big" with "enormous."

Explanation: Passive voice often creates unclear, less direct, and wordy sentences.

Try rephrasing so that the subject does the action instead of receiving it. For example: it was created by him → He created it.

Explanation: When possible, it's better to use a simpler word over a more complex one.

Try replacing phrases with their simpler alternatives for more clear writing.

Explanation: Clichés are unoriginal and lose their ability to evoke an image.

A good rule of thumb for clichés is: if it sounds like you've heard it before, don't use it.

Explanation: Lengthy and complex sentences can make it hard for the reader to follow.

Try to express your ideas as clearly as possible.

Try Grammarly's new AI-powered writing assistant, for free!

Grammarly's AI-powered writing assistant and editor helps you write better essays, more quickly and easily. Get the best AI writing tool for free.

Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions , Privacy Policy , and Cookie Policy .

We have no affiliation with any university or colleges on this site. All product names, logos, and brands are the property of their respective owners.

Get 25% OFF new yearly plans in our Spring Sale

Features for Creative Writers
Features for Work
Features for Higher Education
Features for Teachers
Features for Non-Native Speakers
Learn Blog Grammar Guide Community Events FAQ
Grammar Guide

Free Online Proofreader

Perfect your writing with ProWritingAid's proofreading tool. Try it now for polished, error-free text.

Start typing, paste, or use

Get more suggestions to enhance this text and all your future writing

Your suggestions will show once you've entered some text.

Great job! We didn't find any suggestions in your text.

Our writing tool goes beyond proofreading

In addition to basic proofreading, ProWritingAid has over 25 tailored reports to help improve your writing.

Readability

Redundancies

Sentence structure

Overused words

Transition use

Inclusive language

Homonym confusion

Sentence length variety

Business jargon

Predicted read time

...and more!

It’s just like having a real-life writing coach

Some reports provide quick grammar suggestions. Others go in depth and help you improve the strength and readability of your text.

Trusted for better writing by

Our proofreading tool works wherever you do

We seamlessly integrate across all the apps you use, whether they’re on the desktop or online.

Proofreader FAQs

1. does prowritingaid autocorrect.

ProWritingAid provides recommendations so you can identify and correct writing errors. You have complete control over whether to accept or ignore these suggestions.

2. Can I proofread emails and social media posts?

Yes. As a matter of fact, ProWritingAid's browser extensions work across almost all websites and online apps, including Gmail, LinkedIn, and Google Docs.

3. How can ProWritingAid help?

ProWritingAid helps with a variety of writing tasks. It corrects grammar, spelling, and punctuation, while also enhancing vocabulary variety and more.

4. Is ProWritingAid free?

A free account allows you to edit up to 500 words at a time. If you want to edit larger documents, upgrading is necessary. You can find more information on our pricing page .

5. Can ProWritingAid paraphrase?

Yes! You can rewrite sentences with a single click using Rephrase. See multiple options to reword any sentence.

6. Does ProWritingAid have a plagiarism checker?

Yes! ProWritingAid’s plagiarism checker will check your work against over a billion webpages, published works, and academic papers, so you can be sure of its originality. Find out more about pricing for plagiarism checks here .

Improve your writing today

Drop us a line or let's stay in touch via :

0 Characters

0 Sentences

AI Essay Writer

AI essay writer by Editpad is a free tool that helps you write informative essays without worrying about plagiarism.

Our online essay writer uses advanced AI algorithms to generate meaningful essays with in minutes.

How to use Editpad's AI Essay Writer?

To use our AI essay writer you need to follow these simple steps below:

Type or paste your essay topic in the provided input box.
Give any essay topic, phrase, or single word as per your requirements.
Click on the " Write My Essay " button to start the writing process.
Out tool will automatically provide results in the output box.
Simply copy it by clicking on the "copy icon" or you can save it by clicking on the "download button".

Here are some useful features that make our AI essay writer worthy:

Generate Essay Quickly

Free to use - 2 modes, no signup required for short and medium essays, work smart and fast with ai, other tools.

Plagiarism Checker
Paraphrasing Tool
Reverse Text - Backwards Text Generator
Small Text Generator - Small Caps / Tiny Text
Upside Down Text Generator
Words to Pages
Case Converter
Online rich-text editor
Grammar Checker
Article Rewriter
Invisible Character
Readability Checker
Diff Checker
Text Similarity Checker
Extract Text From Image
Text Summarizer
Emoji Translator
Weird Text Generator
Stylish Text Generator
Glitch Text Generator
Cursive Font Generator
Gothic Text Generator
Discord Font Generator
Aesthetic Text Generator
Cool Text Generator
Wingdings Translator
Old English Translator
Online HTML Editor
Cursed Text Generator
Bubble Text Generator
Strikethrough Text Generator
Zalgo Text Generator
Big Text Generator - Generate Large Text
Old Norse Translator
Fancy Font Generator
Cool Font Generator
Fortnite Font Generator
Fancy Text Generator
Word Counter
Character Counter
Punctuation checker
Text Repeater
Vaporwave Text Generator
Citation Generator
Title Generator
Text To Handwriting
Alphabetizer
Conclusion Generator
Abstract Generator
List Randomizer
Sentence Counter
Speech to text
Check Mark Symbol
Bionic Reading Tool
Fake Address Generator
JPG To Word
Random Choice Generator
AI Content Detector
Podcast Script Generator
Poem Generator
Story Generator
Slogan Generator
Business Idea Generator
Cover Letter Generator
Blurb Generator
Blog Outline Generator
Blog Idea Generator
Essay Writer
AI Email Writer
Binary Translator
Paragraph Generator
Book Title generator
Research Title Generator
Business Name Generator
AI Answer Generator
FAQ Generator

Supported Languages

EN ES BR DE

Refund Policy

Adblock Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying ads to our visitors. please support us by whitelisting our website.

What do you think about this tool?

Your submission has been received. We will be in touch and contact you soon!

Skip to main content
Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

NPR defends its journalism after senior editor says it has lost the public's trust

David Folkenflik

NPR is defending its journalism and integrity after a senior editor wrote an essay accusing it of losing the public's trust. Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

NPR is defending its journalism and integrity after a senior editor wrote an essay accusing it of losing the public's trust.

NPR's top news executive defended its journalism and its commitment to reflecting a diverse array of views on Tuesday after a senior NPR editor wrote a broad critique of how the network has covered some of the most important stories of the age.

"An open-minded spirit no longer exists within NPR, and now, predictably, we don't have an audience that reflects America," writes Uri Berliner.

A strategic emphasis on diversity and inclusion on the basis of race, ethnicity and sexual orientation, promoted by NPR's former CEO, John Lansing, has fed "the absence of viewpoint diversity," Berliner writes.

NPR's chief news executive, Edith Chapin, wrote in a memo to staff Tuesday afternoon that she and the news leadership team strongly reject Berliner's assessment.

"We're proud to stand behind the exceptional work that our desks and shows do to cover a wide range of challenging stories," she wrote. "We believe that inclusion — among our staff, with our sourcing, and in our overall coverage — is critical to telling the nuanced stories of this country and our world."

NPR names tech executive Katherine Maher to lead in turbulent era

She added, "None of our work is above scrutiny or critique. We must have vigorous discussions in the newsroom about how we serve the public as a whole."

A spokesperson for NPR said Chapin, who also serves as the network's chief content officer, would have no further comment.

Praised by NPR's critics

Berliner is a senior editor on NPR's Business Desk. (Disclosure: I, too, am part of the Business Desk, and Berliner has edited many of my past stories. He did not see any version of this article or participate in its preparation before it was posted publicly.)

Berliner's essay , titled "I've Been at NPR for 25 years. Here's How We Lost America's Trust," was published by The Free Press, a website that has welcomed journalists who have concluded that mainstream news outlets have become reflexively liberal.

Berliner writes that as a Subaru-driving, Sarah Lawrence College graduate who "was raised by a lesbian peace activist mother ," he fits the mold of a loyal NPR fan.

Yet Berliner says NPR's news coverage has fallen short on some of the most controversial stories of recent years, from the question of whether former President Donald Trump colluded with Russia in the 2016 election, to the origins of the virus that causes COVID-19, to the significance and provenance of emails leaked from a laptop owned by Hunter Biden weeks before the 2020 election. In addition, he blasted NPR's coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict.

On each of these stories, Berliner asserts, NPR has suffered from groupthink due to too little diversity of viewpoints in the newsroom.

The essay ricocheted Tuesday around conservative media , with some labeling Berliner a whistleblower . Others picked it up on social media, including Elon Musk, who has lambasted NPR for leaving his social media site, X. (Musk emailed another NPR reporter a link to Berliner's article with a gibe that the reporter was a "quisling" — a World War II reference to someone who collaborates with the enemy.)

When asked for further comment late Tuesday, Berliner declined, saying the essay spoke for itself.

The arguments he raises — and counters — have percolated across U.S. newsrooms in recent years. The #MeToo sexual harassment scandals of 2016 and 2017 forced newsrooms to listen to and heed more junior colleagues. The social justice movement prompted by the killing of George Floyd in 2020 inspired a reckoning in many places. Newsroom leaders often appeared to stand on shaky ground.

Leaders at many newsrooms, including top editors at The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times , lost their jobs. Legendary Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron wrote in his memoir that he feared his bonds with the staff were "frayed beyond repair," especially over the degree of self-expression his journalists expected to exert on social media, before he decided to step down in early 2021.

Since then, Baron and others — including leaders of some of these newsrooms — have suggested that the pendulum has swung too far.

Author Interviews

Legendary editor marty baron describes his 'collision of power' with trump and bezos.

New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger warned last year against journalists embracing a stance of what he calls "one-side-ism": "where journalists are demonstrating that they're on the side of the righteous."

"I really think that that can create blind spots and echo chambers," he said.

Internal arguments at The Times over the strength of its reporting on accusations that Hamas engaged in sexual assaults as part of a strategy for its Oct. 7 attack on Israel erupted publicly . The paper conducted an investigation to determine the source of a leak over a planned episode of the paper's podcast The Daily on the subject, which months later has not been released. The newsroom guild accused the paper of "targeted interrogation" of journalists of Middle Eastern descent.

Heated pushback in NPR's newsroom

Given Berliner's account of private conversations, several NPR journalists question whether they can now trust him with unguarded assessments about stories in real time. Others express frustration that he had not sought out comment in advance of publication. Berliner acknowledged to me that for this story, he did not seek NPR's approval to publish the piece, nor did he give the network advance notice.

Some of Berliner's NPR colleagues are responding heatedly. Fernando Alfonso, a senior supervising editor for digital news, wrote that he wholeheartedly rejected Berliner's critique of the coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict, for which NPR's journalists, like their peers, periodically put themselves at risk.

Alfonso also took issue with Berliner's concern over the focus on diversity at NPR.

"As a person of color who has often worked in newsrooms with little to no people who look like me, the efforts NPR has made to diversify its workforce and its sources are unique and appropriate given the news industry's long-standing lack of diversity," Alfonso says. "These efforts should be celebrated and not denigrated as Uri has done."

After this story was first published, Berliner contested Alfonso's characterization, saying his criticism of NPR is about the lack of diversity of viewpoints, not its diversity itself.

"I never criticized NPR's priority of achieving a more diverse workforce in terms of race, ethnicity and sexual orientation. I have not 'denigrated' NPR's newsroom diversity goals," Berliner said. "That's wrong."

Questions of diversity

Under former CEO John Lansing, NPR made increasing diversity, both of its staff and its audience, its "North Star" mission. Berliner says in the essay that NPR failed to consider broader diversity of viewpoint, noting, "In D.C., where NPR is headquartered and many of us live, I found 87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans."

Berliner cited audience estimates that suggested a concurrent falloff in listening by Republicans. (The number of people listening to NPR broadcasts and terrestrial radio broadly has declined since the start of the pandemic.)

Former NPR vice president for news and ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin tweeted , "I know Uri. He's not wrong."

Others questioned Berliner's logic. "This probably gets causality somewhat backward," tweeted Semafor Washington editor Jordan Weissmann . "I'd guess that a lot of NPR listeners who voted for [Mitt] Romney have changed how they identify politically."

Similarly, Nieman Lab founder Joshua Benton suggested the rise of Trump alienated many NPR-appreciating Republicans from the GOP.

In recent years, NPR has greatly enhanced the percentage of people of color in its workforce and its executive ranks. Four out of 10 staffers are people of color; nearly half of NPR's leadership team identifies as Black, Asian or Latino.

"The philosophy is: Do you want to serve all of America and make sure it sounds like all of America, or not?" Lansing, who stepped down last month, says in response to Berliner's piece. "I'd welcome the argument against that."

"On radio, we were really lagging in our representation of an audience that makes us look like what America looks like today," Lansing says. The U.S. looks and sounds a lot different than it did in 1971, when NPR's first show was broadcast, Lansing says.

A network spokesperson says new NPR CEO Katherine Maher supports Chapin and her response to Berliner's critique.

The spokesperson says that Maher "believes that it's a healthy thing for a public service newsroom to engage in rigorous consideration of the needs of our audiences, including where we serve our mission well and where we can serve it better."

Disclosure: This story was reported and written by NPR Media Correspondent David Folkenflik and edited by Deputy Business Editor Emily Kopp and Managing Editor Gerry Holmes. Under NPR's protocol for reporting on itself, no NPR corporate official or news executive reviewed this story before it was posted publicly.

JONATHAN TURLEY

Npr editor blasts the public-funded company for political bias and activism.

Beliner details how NPR, like many media outlets, became openly activist after the election of Donald Trump to the point that the company now employs 87 registered Democrats in editorial positions but not a single Republican in its Washington, DC, headquarters.

Berliner says that he was rebuffed in seeking a modicum of balance in the coverage about the coronavirus “lab leak theory,” the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, Hunter Biden’s laptop, and the 2016 Russia hoax.

As discussed on this blog, NPR repeated false stories like the claims from the Lafayette Park riot . Berliner gives an account that is strikingly familiar for many of us who have raised the purging of conservative or libertarian voices from our faculties in higher education:

“So on May 3, 2021, I presented the findings at an all-hands editorial staff meeting. When I suggested we had a diversity problem with a score of 87 Democrats and zero Republicans, the response wasn’t hostile. It was worse. It was met with profound indifference. I got a few messages from surprised, curious colleagues. But the messages were of the “oh wow, that’s weird” variety, as if the lopsided tally was a random anomaly rather than a critical failure of our diversity North Star. In a follow-up email exchange, a top NPR news executive told me that she had been “skewered” for bringing up diversity of thought when she arrived at NPR. So, she said, “I want to be careful how we discuss this publicly.” For years, I have been persistent. When I believe our coverage has gone off the rails, I have written regular emails to top news leaders, sometimes even having one-on-one sessions with them. On March 10, 2022, I wrote to a top news executive about the numerous times we described the controversial education bill in Florida as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill when it didn’t even use the word gay . I pushed to set the record straight, and wrote another time to ask why we keep using that word that many Hispanics hate— Latinx . On March 31, 2022, I was invited to a managers’ meeting to present my observations”

Former NPR analyst Juan Williams stated in an interview this week that, as a strong liberal voice (now at Fox), he found the same bias at NPR. Williams was fired by NPR as this shift seemed to go into high gear toward greater intolerance for opposing views.

Despite these criticisms, NPR has doubled down on its activism. For example, when it came time to select a new CEO, NPR could have tacked to the center to address the growing criticism. Instead, the new CEO became instant news over social media postings that she deleted before the recent announcement of her selection. Katherine Maher is the former CEO of Wikipedia and sought to remove controversial postings on subjects ranging from looters to Trump. Those deleted postings included a 2018 declaration that “Donald Trump is a racist” and a variety of race-based commentary. They also included a statement that appeared to excuse looting.

NPR has abandoned core policies on neutrality as its newsroom has become more activist and strident. For example, NPR declared that it would allow employees to participate in political protests when the editors believe the causes advance the “freedom and dignity of human beings.”

The rule itself shows how impressionistic and unprofessional media has become in the woke era. NPR does not try to define what causes constitute advocacy for the “freedom and dignity of human beings.” How about climate change and environmental protection? Would it be prohibited to protest for a forest but okay if it is framed as “environmental justice”?

NPR seems to intentionally keep such questions vague while only citing such good causes as Black Lives Matter and gay rights:

“Is it OK to march in a demonstration and say, ‘Black lives matter’? What about a Pride parade? In theory, the answer today is, “Yes.” But in practice, NPR journalists will have to discuss specific decisions with their bosses, who in turn will have to ask a lot of questions.”

So the editors will have the power to choose between acceptable and unacceptable causes.

The bias seemed to snowball into a type of willful blindness in the coverage of the outlet, which is supported by federal funds.

After the New York Post first reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020, NPR declared that it would not cover the story. It actually issued a statement that seemed to proudly refuse to pursue the story, which was found to be legitimate:

“We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.”

Berliner’s account is reminiscent of the recent disclosures from within the New York Times. Former editors have described that same open intolerance for opposing views and a refusal to balance coverage.

Former New York Times editorial page editor James Bennet has finally spoken publicly about his role in one of the most disgraceful chapters in American journalism: the Times’ cringing apology for running a 2020 column by Sen. Tom Cotton . Bennet said publisher AG Sulzberger “set me on fire and threw me in the garbage” to appease the mob.

Former New York Times editor Adam Rubenstein also wrote a lengthy essay at The Atlantic that pulled back the curtain on the newspaper and its alleged bias in its coverage. The essay follows similar pieces from former editors and writers that range from Bari Weiss to his former colleague James Bennet . The essay describes a similar work environment where even his passing reference to liking Chick-Fil-A sandwiches led to a condemnation of shocked colleagues.

None of this is likely to change the culture at NPR any more than such discussions have changed faculties in higher education. Raising the virtual elimination of conservative or Republican voices on faculties is met by the same forced expressions of disbelief. While mild concern is expressed, it is often over the “perception” of those of us who view universities as intolerant or orthodox.

Of course, there remains the question of why the public should give huge amounts of money to a media outlet that is so politically biased. News outlets have every right to pursue such political agendas, but none but NPR claim public support, including from half of the country that embraces the viewpoints that it routinely omits from its airways.

For those interested in what might turn out to be the imminent onset of World War III, RT — Russia Today (which Turley troll UpstateFarmer has never heard of — LOL)— is reporting the likelihood of an Iranian response to Israel having killed a couple of Iranian generals at the Iranian Consulate in Syria:

“Iran strike on Israel ‘imminent’ – media” https://www.rt.com/news/595715-iran-israel-imminent-strike/

This is apparently information originating at Bloomberg News, but since one needs a paid account to read Bloomberg News (because lord knows Michael Bloomberg doesn’t already have enough money), the next best thing is RT’s FREE reporting of what Bloomberg is reporting.

Why is our government made up of 100% a’h0les? Couldn’t we get maybe 5% good people? But no, with the Biden administration it’s wall to wall a’h0les. As libs like to say, no exceptions.

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1778112068622721172

The Interview With Uri Berliner

Berliner gave an interview yesterday to The Free Press. And ‘yes’, he is highly critical of NPR. It sounds as though more than a few Bernie Bros are working there. But this one paragraph below underlines a fundamental problem the media has in covering Donald Trump. ***

Like many unfortunate things, the rise of advocacy took off with Donald Trump. As in many newsrooms, his election in 2016 was greeted at NPR with a mixture of disbelief, anger, and despair. (Just to note, I eagerly voted against Trump twice but felt we were obliged to cover him fairly.) But what began as tough, straightforward coverage of a belligerent, truth-impaired president veered toward efforts to damage or topple Trump’s presidency.

https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust …………………………………………

KEY PASSAGE FROM ABOVE:

“But what began as tough, straightforward coverage of a belligerent, truth-impaired president.. ***

How does mainstream media cover a president who routinely utters falsehoods and has no regard for facts or science?

Trump also has a habit of ‘kidding around’ at inappropriate moments. Like that press conference where he wondered out loud if injecting bleach might prevent Covid.

Then Trump doubles-down on falsehoods when any rational president would simply admit the error. Like that time he mistakenly warned that a hurricane would hit Alabama. Meteorologists at the National Weather Bureau were actually cautioned by political appointees ‘not’ to contradict.

Trump is notoriously thin-skinned and obsessed with retribution. That too becomes a problem for journalists. How can they not take notice when Trump openly threatens people on social media?

Until Donald Trump, almost every U.S. President had either been Vice President, Senator, Governor or General. And in those positions, future presidents learned how to measure their words for public consumption.

But Donald Trump’s last job before the presidency had been reality TV star. In that position, Trump routinely uttered rash statements to create vital tension. That’s what drives reality shows: tension, drama and conflict.

But tension, drama and conflict are totally undesirable with regards to the presidency. A man who keeps churning trouble out of habit is ‘last’ person the country needs as Commandeer In Chief.

Therefore mainstream has no idea how to cover a president like Trump without sounding biased against him. Because reporting Trump, as he really is, sounds naturally terrible.

REGARDING ABOVE:

“ How does mainstream media cover a president who routinely utters falsehoods and has no regard for facts or science?”

the same way you report on every president. They all lie, distract, gaslight. All politicians do.

It’s the job of reporters to investigate and expose those lies or half-truths, not just to publish the press releases or quotes that public figures hand out.

That is a worthy and honorable profession, if done well.

But you’re struggling with reporting “Trump, as he really is” because he “sounds naturally terrible” that shows that you’re not reporting, you’re FEELING.

Are you going to tell me Biden doesn’t sound “naturally terrible?” I don’t know how old you are, but I’ve been watching this guy for decades. When he was younger (and better able to communicate), he was arrogant and often rude. As full of himself as Trump. Bidden’s sounded “naturally terrible” many times!

Yet no one’s wringing their hands over him—even now, when half the words he speaks are slurred. .

^^Paid DNC troll. Ignore.

NPR won’t tell you that AA support for Trump is surging. Not only are they sick of Bidenomics, open borders and out-of-control crime, this is heartwarming – “I don’t care what the media tells you, we support you”:

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1778114112444309718

No wonder the far-right is mad at npr, if they point out the lies from the right, npr gets accused of being unfair to the liars.

The only people mad at NPR is NPR staff for one of their own, rightfully, calling them out for their lies, overt bias, wokeism and slanted reporting. Others who might be mad at NPR, is the 10% of those employees who got laid off. Why did they get laid off? Plunging donations from their listeners and corporate sponsorship. The rest of us who used to be NPR listeners quit listening for their lies, overt bias, wokeism and slanted reporting.

You must be really mad that RT tv is off the air.

Fishstick, I have no idea who or what RT TV is. As I have stated on more than a few occasions on the good professor’s blog, I do not watch TV. I READ, independent media or watch independent media like Sharyl Attkisson’s Full Measure. Or Glenn Greenwald’s System Update. Matt Taibbi’s podcasts. Or Honestly with Bari Weiss. Your lame attempts to associate me with whatever RT TV is, fails once again. As usual.

“… I have no idea who or what RT TV is.”

LOL — Nice confession of ignorance, Captain “Well Said.” I’m quite certain that Sharyl Attkisson, Glenn Greewald, Matt Taibbi, AND Bari Weiss — whom you CLAIM to follow — know who/what RT is and have mentioned RT many times.

RT — Russia Today — has broken some pretty big stories over the years, including the May 20, 2013, article involving the Hillary Clinton Benghazi scandal involving emails between Hillary and her sleazy associate, Sidney Blumentthal:

“Hillary Clinton’s ‘hacked’ Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE” https://www.rt.com/usa/complete-emails-guccifer-clinton-554/

Note the date of that article — YEARS before the US media caught on to what Hillary was and wasn’t doing.

I am mad about that. I liked RT TV. One of the few places you could hear honest news.

Agreed. RT was actually better than much of our American ‘fake news’ propaganda press.

Thank you FW (F*ckWad???) for reminding me about RT TV! They may not be on the air, but they are still on the net!

Andrey Sushentsov: Americans can’t tell us who blew up Nord Stream, but they solved the Moscow terror attack case in 15 minutes?

The United States of America is trying to control and manipulate the media and political interpretation of the tragic terrorist attack in Moscow last month. In the Western information space, Washington is forming a narrative to try to distract attention from its proxy, Ukraine.

At certain points, ISIS was a useful tool for the Americans in Syria. There is published evidence suggesting that the US operated in parallel with the terrorist group against the Syrian government. The fact that Washington was ready to offer a coherent version of events from the first minutes after the attack in Moscow is in itself extremely paradoxical.

Consider this. The Americans have spent decades trying to determine the cause of crimes on their own soil, such as the assassinations of leading US political figures. They lack the resources, attention and enthusiasm to determine who was behind the sabotage of pan-European energy infrastructure: the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

However, within 15 minutes, they provided “accurate” information about who organized the terrorist attack in Moscow.

https://www.rt.com/russia/595712-sushentsov-interpretation-tragedy-crocus/

Floyd, it’s amusing to see American commies channeling Joe McCarthy, no?

Fishy de facto refers to the American Founders as “far-right.”

Everything the Founders established was conservative.

Nothing the Founders conceived and implemented was liberal.

Karl Marx conjured the Communist Manifesto 59 years after the Constitution precisely because Karl Marx opposed the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Fishy de facto possess a “far-left,” aka communist, perspective.

America, by Constitution, is an extremely conservative, restricted-vote republic, and distinctly not a one man, one vote democracy, which constitutes the “dictatorship of the proletariat.”

Fishy is a direct and mortal enemy of the American thesis of Freedom and Self-Reliance, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, actual Americans, and America.

Turley has absolutely nothing to say about Fox paying $800,000,000 in damages to Dominion Voting Systems and admitting in court documents that they KNOWINGLY lied about the election being rigged.

“We acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false,” the [Fox] statement said.

Not just simple bias by Fox. They outright lied and paid the price.

You can read all about it here: https://www.npr.org/2023/04/18/1170339114/fox-news-settles-blockbuster-defamation-lawsuit-with-dominion-voting-systems

Hannity also admitted in his sworn deposition that he lied about the election being rigged.

“Fox News host Sean Hannity admitted under oath that he “did not believe” for “one second” there was mass voter fraud in the election.”

Read all about it here: https://thehill.com/homenews/3785645-sean-hannity-admits-in-deposition-he-didnt-believe-trump-voter-fraud-claims/

AMERICA MUST BE DONE WITH NPR

National Public Radio (NPR) is a direct and mortal enemy of the American thesis of Freedom and Self-Reliance, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, actual Americans, and America.

NPR is a sham.

NPR is distinctly not any form or rendition of a patriotic NATIONAL radio of America.

NPR has no relationship to the American thesis of Freedom and Self-Reliance.

NPR falsely exists under and deleteriously promotes the principles of the Communist Manifesto.

Taxpayer funding for NPR is counterintuitive, preposterous, seditious, and unconstitutional.

Congress has the power to tax ONLY for debt, defense, and general Welfare (i.e. security and basic infrastructure).

Congress has no power to tax for, fund, operate, or function as a free market enterprise or any aspect or facet of the free market free press.

Governmental broadcasting and publication is brainwashing, propaganda, and indoctrination used with great effect in communist countries, and, through NPR, in America.

Congress has the power to regulate ONLY the value of money, commerce among the States to preclude bias by one over another, and land and naval Forces.

Period. Full Stop. Read it.

The Communications Act of 1934 and the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 were and remain flagrantly unconstitutional, enjoying no legal or constitutional basis while abridging and denying the 1st Amendment freedom of the press.

NPR must have been immediately struck down by the judicial branch, with emphasis on the Supreme Court, five decades ago, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) earlier.

To the absent, subjective, partial, and biased communist Supreme Court, READ IT; you traitors are “adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort,” per Article 3, Section 3. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Article 1, Section 8

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Ahh bias at a news organization, who woulda thought.

Meanwhile, Another close trump aid bites the dust. Ahh can you image that, someone who worked for trump is a convicted perjury. https://www.alternet.org/allen-weisselberg-jail-trump/

Is Fani Willis one of Trump’s associates?

And Benedict Arnold worked for George Washington, prior to his failure of fealty and sub-rosa duplicity.

I can’t wait for the chickens coming home to roost. You lawfare maggots will rot in hell with your chicom owners.

It should not be difficult for anyone to report the news, including some explanation of the positions on either side of an issue, in an unbiased manner. It becoming less of a conservative vs. liberal matter, more of whether or not to allow Americans to have enough information to form their own opinions or, in accordance with the founding fathers, allow more information to counter “misinformation.” Having conducted a number of investigations to determine how Americans communicate with each other and form opinions about political matters, Adam Schiff is definitely in the camp that believes that information should be carefully controlled by a cabal of privileged “disinformation experts,” the “beautiful people” with intelligence agency backgrounds.

The opaque, black hole nobody in journalism wants to discuss is news selection. There are no standards for how a news org selects what deserves to be covered and what ignored. Nothing is ever written down in an attempt to standardize or improve how news is prioritized. All we have a are lame aphorisms (“if it bleeds, it leads”).

There was a time when network TV news was a cost-center, and newspapers were supported by local advertising, news selection was a balanced mixture of “human interest”, crime, politics, and good-news stories, with opinion pieces clearly marked as such. It’s always been the case that there is simply way too much going on to give press coverage to — and editors, producers and execs with their teams tossed around priorities for coverage, and made the calls. Somewhere in that mix was the notion of serving the public interest — providing info that would be helpful to know and not throwaway infotainment.

All that changed with privatization of media and profit-centered news orgs. Instant audience metrics came not too long after that, which laid bare the base instincts of the audience toward instant gratification and stimulus-accretion (yep, as in an addict’s need for greater dosage over time). This lead to the current news format of alarmist sensationalism — tricking the audience into thinking their world is on the verge of collapse in order to keep their attention glued. Then, came social media, anyone-can-publish, Twitter, and fracture of the audience into liberal and conservative info-bubbles.

Under this tribalistic media cleavage, news relevance devolves into 1) that which makes the opposition look bad including grievances (many speculative) about what “they” did to “us”, and 2) that which makes “us” look good.

Only when the audience grows sick of being pandered to in this manner, and abandons the alarmist-sensationalism format and its purveyors, will things change for the better. The audience holds the power to discipline media journalism, but only after each news consumer becomes a standards-setting body guided by conscious choice, and much less a creature of consumption habit.

Well said. The “disinformation experts” are way more dangerous than the disinformation they claim to be worried about.

Whether or not NPR receives funding from the government is irrelevant. The only standards for a news organization are to tell the truth.

The truth is that Criminal Defendant Trump and his Republican minions are a clear and present danger to the Republic and indeed to democracy. They provably spread Russian propaganda and side with our enemies. Just today it was reported that Republican Rep. Ken Buck revealed that many of his republican colleagues privately refer to Marjorie Taylor Greene as “Moscow Marjorie”.

This is the truth. This is what NPR reports. Compare this with the lies and propaganda spewing out of Fox.

The truth matters, and all news organizations have an obligation to report it regardless of their source of funding.

^^ Paid DNC troll. Ignore.

What was posted that is not true?

Can you trust trump and anything he says? trumps long time accountant is heading to jail for perjury.

Can you trust anything Biden says? Oh wait, let me rephrase that: can you trust anything Biden slurs?

As RFK Jr. said, Biden is a bigger threat to “democracy” than Trump.

Edwardmahl, Well said. No other president has weaponized government agencies to prosecute their political opponents more than the Biden admin.

To Anonymous:

Are Democrats perfect?

Is there never anything negative to say about any Democrat?

You miss the point: it’s fine to report on Marjorie Taylor Greene, as long as you cover the hatred and garbage spewed by Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Corrie Bush, AOC, et al

Seth Goldstein

Whom you referring to when you say, “OUR ENEMIES THE RUSSIANS”

They’re not MY enemies. I am a nobody out here in flyover land, a native born white male peasant nobody.

My enemies mostly live in 3 locations: Hollywood, DC, and Manhattan.

And no they’re not POOOTIN or the dreaded Chinese SEE SEE PEE

So who’s the boogeyman now, that old Soros is nearing his exit?

I think Larry Fink is probably a good picl. He is an ANTITRUST LAW VIOLATING RACKETEER. LOCK HIM UP!

The donor class. The plutocracy. As a group. That’s it. The exceptions prove the rule.

How are your Truth Social shares doing?

He’s probably buying more. I mean it’s a bargain right? And besides, trump needs the money to pay his lawyers, so they can get lawyers, to keep all his followers, and lawyers, out of jail.

Maybe you should leave your enemies behind and move to Russia to join your friends.

By “white male,” you mean American, just as the American Founders meant American when they employed the phrase “…free white person…” within the year of the adoption of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. __________________________________

Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1798, and 1802

United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” March 26, 1790

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof…

Rep. Ken Buck revealed that many of his republican

The only rigorous process we have for getting to the truth is legally in Courts of Law, with adversarial conflict, strict rules of evidence, a neutral Judge forcing a timetable, punishment for perjury, and a Jury of peers as the ultimate deciders-of-fact. This system took centuries to evolve, and yes, there were many failures at justice, but this system is the best it’s ever been (despite what crybaby Trump wants you to believe).

The legal process provides truth-finding, conflict-resolution and closure in a manner that is impossible with the lesser tools of journalism and the “court of public opinion”. In that latter venue, people can lie and cover-up, and cleverness in crafting false narratives is the coin of the realm. Example: How Tony Blinken and Mike Morrell chose to cover-up Hunter’s laptop in the last 3 weeks of the 2020 campaign.

We should be expanding the ability to challenge Public Frauds, especially those waged for political advantage, through Civil torts, the same way defamation can be challenged, and the truth forced upon deceitful infowarriors.

NPR Editor's Critical Op-Ed Ignites Debate Over Political Bias in Journalism: 'This Essay Has It Backwards'

A scathing op-ed from NPR veteran and current senior business editor Uri Berliner published in The Free Press on Tuesday has intensified debates over whether the publicly funded news organization has adopted a partisan lean in recent years.

In the piece , Berliner details a culture shift at the organization, in which "An open-minded spirit no longer exists within NPR, and now, predictably, we don't have an audience that reflects America."

Berliner argued that NPR is plagued with an "absence of viewpoint diversity," which he considers to be a result of leadership's emphasis on promoting diversity and inclusion on the basis of race and sexual orientation. He also claims that he found "87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans."

NPR editor-in-chief Edith Chapin defended the organization in response to the piece, saying she the leadership team "strongly disagree with Uri's assessment of the quality of our journalism."

While Chapin backed the "exceptional work that our desks and shows do to cover a wide range of challenging stories," she added that "None of our work is above scrutiny or critique. We must have vigorous discussions in the newsroom about how we serve the public as a whole."

According to NPR media reporter David Folkenflik , several journalists inside the organization question how they can proceed with Berliner as a colleague, with concerns about whether he can be a trusted member of NPR in the aftermath of the op-ed. Additionally, Berliner did not seek NPR's approval to publish the piece, nor did he seek comment from the organization ahead of time; though he does say in his piece that he sought to raise his concerns with leadership on several occasions.

Meanwhile, outside of the organization, debates regarding the content of Berliner's piece have sprouted up across social media, with many coming to the defense of the storied NPR institution.

Some argued that the shift that occurred in political coverage across the media industry was forced on institutions due to the changing nature of the Republican Party since the election of Donald Trump in 2016.

Some came to Berliner's defense, including former NPR vice president for news Jeffrey Dvorkin who vouched for the changes to the organization.

The post NPR Editor's Critical Op-Ed Ignites Debate Over Political Bias in Journalism: 'This Essay Has It Backwards' appeared first on TheWrap .

NPR Fires Back at Staffer’s Missive About Left-Wing ‘Miscues’

Senior business editor Uri Berliner wrote an essay claiming Americans no longer trust NPR because of its lack of “viewpoint diversity” and embrace of DEI.

Corbin Bolies

Media Reporter

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty

NPR struck back on Tuesday at its senior business editor Uri Berliner’s lengthy screed alleged his own outlet has sacrificed journalistic values and adopted progressive views on issues that have alienated Americans.

“I and my colleagues on the leadership team strongly disagree with Uri’s assessment of the quality of our journalism and the integrity of our newsroom processes,” NPR Editor in Chief Edith Chapin wrote to staffers in a memo, which was first reported by The New York Times. “We’re proud to stand behind the exceptional work that our desks and shows do to cover a wide range of challenging stories. We believe that inclusion—among our staff, with our sourcing, and in our overall coverage—is critical to telling the nuanced stories of this country and our world.”

NPR declined to comment beyond Chapin’s letter, which was first reported by The New York Times.

Berliner wrote in The Free Press, a digital outlet founded by Bari Weiss , that Americans have lost trust in NPR due to a lack of “viewpoint diversity” among its staff. He cited NPR’s coverage of the COVID-19 lab leak theory, Hunter Biden’s laptop, and allegations that Donald Trump colluded with Russia in the 2016 election as examples of how “politics were blotting out the curiosity and independence that ought to have been driving our work.”

He also wrote that the consideration of diversity, equity, and inclusion, along with the use of language provided by journalism affinity groups, represented “the extent to which people at every level of NPR have comfortably coalesced around the progressive worldview.” Berliner specifically cited an NPR initiative collecting demographic data from every source its reporters interview, which launched in 2020 as a way for the outlet to track the diversity of its sourcing.

Berliner claimed he tried to go to management with complaints about the company’s positions and even looked up the voter registration of the D.C. newsroom, allegedly finding zero registered Republicans. When he presented those findings at a 2021 all-staff meeting, he said he was met with “profound indifference” from colleagues. “The messages were of the ‘oh wow, that’s weird’ variety, as if the lopsided tally was a random anomaly rather than a critical failure of our diversity North Star,” he recalled.

Chapin, NPR’s top editor, fired back at Berliner’s dismissal of the outlet’s diversity initiatives, saying in her memo that “exploring the diverse perspectives that drive world events is necessary to our public service mission.”

“That’s why we have built in processes to verify accuracy and why we adhere to the highest editorial standards,” she wrote. “It’s why we have a standards and practices editor as well as a public editor to stand-in for the audience. It’s why we track sources—so we can expand the diversity of perspectives in our reporting. We have these internal debates, enforce strong editorial standards, and engage in processes that measure our work precisely because we recognize that nobody has the ‘view from nowhere.’”

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here .

READ THIS LIST

Essay Editing Service

Get accepted at your dream school.

Expert essay editors polish your writing to reflect the work you put into it. Professional college essay editing will:

Make sure that your essay will get read
Make sure you'll leave a positive impression
Make you stand out from your peers

College Essay Editing & Coaching

Professional editors

12 hour turnaround, 100% happiness guarantee.

corrected college essay example with comments

College Essay Editing Services

Our college essay editing package.

The first draft is always the hardest. Work with an admissions essay coach who will give you practical, step-by-step guidance on how to develop your essay and make your story come alive.

Your coach will…

Read your profile
Review your essay draft
Share feedback to help you refine your topic, structure, and voice
Leave in-text feedback and suggestions
Proofread for grammar and punctuation
Give you a roadmap to guide your revisions

We’ll help you show your best traits to college admissions officers and prove that you’re college-ready! With help from our essay coaches, you’ll improve your chances of getting accepted – so what are you waiting for?

Meet Scribbr's essay experts

At Scribbr, you can rest assured that only the best editors will work on your college essay.

All our 800+ editors have passed the challenging Scribbr Academy, which has a passing rate of only 2%.

We handpick your college essay editor on several criteria, including field of study.

Janice holds a PhD in German studies from Duke University. As a former professor, she has helped many students refine their application essays for competitive degree programs and study-abroad programs. Today, she helps students improve their writing skills at Scribbr. In her spare time, when she's not writing or editing, she enjoys working on the small family farm that she owns and operates.

Alexandra earned an Erasmus Mundus MA in cultural narratives and a BA in English from Emory University. As a teacher, editor, and writing coach, she has spent nearly a decade helping students find their voice and express their ideas.

Originally from Maryland, Amy headed west to attend Scripps College in California, where she earned a bachelor's degree in music and gender studies. In 2009, she began working for the admissions office of her alma mater, where she focused on reviewing applications and interviewing prospective students.

“Extremely professional and timely”

Extremely professional and timely! Regis did an amazing job bringing my admission essay to life. It went from overly wordy and unclear to very professional and concise. If I don’t get into my desired program, it won’t be because of my essay.

How it works

Get quality feedback in 4 easy steps, upload your college essay.

Upload your college essay , and tell us a little about yourself. We’ll match you with a certified college essay coach.

Sit back and relax

Your coach will edit your essay and share in-depth advice to help you strengthen your structure, content, and narrative.

Receive your feedback

We’ll send back your fully edited essay. Applying to college is nerve-racking, but at Scribbr you never have to wait for long.

Revise and submit your essay

Thanks to your coach’s feedback, you’ll feel clear about the next steps and confident when you hit “send” on your application.

Scribbr & academic integrity

Scribbr is committed to protecting academic integrity. Our proofreading service, our AI writing tools ( plagiarism checker , paraphrasing tool , grammar checker , summarizer, Citation Generator ) as well as our free Knowledge Base content are designed to help students produce quality academic papers.

We make every effort to prevent our software from being used for fraudulent or manipulative purposes.

Your questions, answered.

We know that waiting for feedback can be nerve-racking. If you select our faster deadline option, you’ll hear from your personal statement editor in 12 hours or less – including on weekends and holidays.

We never engage in rewriting or adding text at Scribbr. Our personal statement editors will make grammatical corrections and leave suggestions using Word’s track changes and commenting feature. However, we always make sure that your perspective and voice remain front and center in your essay.

We know that waiting for feedback can be nerve-racking. If you select our faster deadline option, you’ll hear from your college essay coach in 12 hours or less – including on weekends and holidays.

Yes. All our college essay coaches are subject-matter experts and can help you make decisions regarding the content of your essay. Your coach will help you make a strong case for your admission.

Our essay coaches will provide feedback on…

Whether your topic is appropriate and how to strengthen it
Whether your essay demonstrates positive traits and authenticity
Whether the narrative flows smoothly and grabs the reader’s attention
How to dig deeper and show self-reflection and insight
What content is missing and should be added
What content is weak and should be removed
How to shorten your essay to meet a word count limit

However, we will never…

Write or rewrite content for you
Research or fact-check your essay’s content

If you have any questions, feel free to email [email protected].

Yes! Our essay coaches can help you reduce your word count by up to 25%. You can choose to receive this feedback through direct edits or suggestions in comments – just select your choice when you upload your essay.

When you submit your essay to our College Essay Editing & Coaching service, you’ll be asked to indicate what type of content feedback you would like to receive. You can choose from three options:

Dig deep and challenge me

Give me the standard treatment

Tread lightly

Whichever option you choose, you’ll receive in-depth content feedback from your essay coach. However, the type of feedback your essay coach provides may differ, and the option you should choose depends on what outcome you want from the review. You can always elaborate on what type of feedback you want in your note to your essay coach.

Learn more about the three options below.

Choose from three options

If you choose this option, we’ll challenge you to write the best possible essay – no content suggestions are off-limits, including reorienting your topic or reframing your story. Students who choose this option aren’t afraid to go back to the drawing board if it’ll increase their chances of getting accepted. You may have to roll up your sleeves and do some more work on your essay, but your essay will be much stronger because of it.

Select this option if your priority is to have the best possible essay, even if it requires some extra work on your side.

We’ll strike a balance between “dig deep and challenge me” and “tread lightly.” We may suggest changes to your structure and narrative, including removing weak content, elaborating on certain sections, and adding content to strengthen your arguments. You may have to rework sentences and paragraphs, but we won’t suggest major content changes.

With this option, we’ll focus on improving your essay in a way that requires little additional work from you. We’ll provide you with targeted suggestions for how to refine your essay’s structure and narrative, but we will work within your current structure and topic. While you may have to make a few tweaks here and there, we’ll aim to return you a polished draft that’s ready to be submitted to your chosen colleges.

Select this option if you are fairly satisfied with your essay and don’t want to make major changes or if you have limited time to revise.

At Scribbr, we promise to make every customer 100% happy with the service we offer. Our philosophy: Your complaint is always justified – no denial, no doubts.

Our customer support team is here to find the solution that helps you the most, whether that’s a free new edit or a refund for the service.

Get in touch, with real people

We answer your questions quickly and personally from 9:00 to 23:00 CET

Start live chat
Email [email protected]
Call +1 (510) 822-8066
WhatsApp +31 20 261 6040

Knowledge Base

Finish your college essay with scribbr’s top-rated guides.

College Essay

How to Write a College Essay

What colleges look for in an essay, choosing your college essay topic, college essay format & structure.

Trump Calls for Defunding NPR After Senior Editor’s ‘Viewpoint Diversity’ Essay

While critical of the public media org’s current management, Uri Berliner maintains that “defunding isn’t the answer”

After a senior editor at National Public Radio on Tuesday blasted his employer of 25 years for not having any Republicans on staff, Donald Trump called for the nonprofit media organization to be defunded.

“NO MORE FUNDING FOR NPR, A TOTAL SCAM! EDITOR SAID THEY HAVE NO REPUBLICANS, AND IS ONLY USED TO ‘DAMAGE TRUMP.’ THEY ARE A LIBERAL DISINFORMATION MACHINE. NOT ONE DOLLAR!!!” Trump wrote in all caps on his Truth Social media platform Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Uri Berliner wrote an op-ed for The Free Press lamenting the “absence of viewpoint diversity” at NPR, writing that he found “87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans.”

Berliner wrote that, due to DEI initiatives that focus on hiring people of diverse ethnicities and genders, “an open-minded spirit no longer exists within NPR, and now, predictably, we don’t have an audience that reflects America.”

Berliner also wrote that he “eagerly voted against Trump twice,” but was upset that “what began as tough, straightforward coverage of a belligerent, truth-impaired president veered toward efforts to damage or topple Trump’s presidency.”

An award-winning journalist himself, Berliner added that “despite our missteps at NPR, defunding isn’t the answer.”

“As the country becomes more fractured, there’s still a need for a public institution where stories are told and viewpoints exchanged in good faith,” he wrote. “Defunding, as a rebuke from Congress, wouldn’t change the journalism at NPR. That needs to come from within.”

NPR editor-in-chief Edith Chapin defended the organization in response to the piece, saying she and the leadership team “strongly disagree with Uri’s assessment of the quality of our journalism.”

Journalist Mehdi Hasan also weighed in on the issue Tuesday, tweeting, “This essay has it backwards: you can’t blame NPR for conservatives not listening. You have to ask why conservatives have gone down conspiracy holes (climate change, 2020 election, vaccines) & how on earth mainstream media is supposed to cater to them now?”

Per NPR’s website, its income comes from dues and fees paid by member stations, underwriting from corporate sponsors and annual grants from the publicly funded Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Less than 1% of its funding comes directly from the federal government.

NPR is currently rated as “leaning left” by Allsides.com , which assesses media bias, more centrist than the “left” status of The Huffington Post .