role of entrepreneurship in economic development research paper

Worldwide role of women entrepreneurs in economic development

Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

ISSN : 2398-7812

Article publication date: 11 August 2020

Issue publication date: 9 November 2020

The contribution of women entrepreneurs is still invisible and needs to be properly investigated. The purpose of this paper is to investigate this relationship by measuring women entrepreneurship and economic development at global level.

Design/methodology/approach

Secondary data has been retrieved from Female Entrepreneurship Index Report 2015, Human Development Report 2015 and KOF Index of Globalization 2015. Cross-sectional data is used from 69 countries of the world. Multiple regression is applied to estimate the data.

The results explained the significant impact of women entrepreneurship on the economies of the world. It was observed that women participation in entrepreneurial activities not only supports to their family income but also plays a significant role in economic development and social well-being of the society.

Research limitations/implications

There is no information about total output of women entrepreneurs in terms of new enterprises setups and established businesses of women except for year 2015. So, to measure the real contribution of women entrepreneurs around the globe is still a challenge.

Practical implications

It is reality that when women would be empowered as entrepreneurs then whole society gets benefits from it, as women entrepreneurs are beneficial for not only economic development but also social development of society.

Originality/value

This study uniquely addresses the contribution of women entrepreneurs in the world economy which is still an unseen but a powerful benefactor of development.

• Globalization
• Economic development
• Women entrepreneurship
• Social development
• Gender inequality
• Sustainable growth

Sajjad, M. , Kaleem, N. , Chani, M.I. and Ahmed, M. (2020), "Worldwide role of women entrepreneurs in economic development", Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-06-2019-0041

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Muhammad Sajjad, Nishat Kaleem, Muhammad Irfan Chani and Munir Ahmed.

Published in Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship . Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Introduction

Global economy is multifaceted, and it is very difficult to measure the impact of numerous individual factors on it. A number of researchers ( Boretos, 2009 ; Nguyen and Le, 2019 ) sifted this complex global economy but still there is lack of a holistic approach to measure all of its dimensions. So, there is need to measure the world economy from different aspects to attain synergy. One aspect which contributes in the global economy is the entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is considered to enhance the productivity, capacity and size of the economy with the help of creativity and competitiveness ( Acs et al. , 2008 ; Zanjirchi et al. , 2019 ). The concept of entrepreneurship is not new in economic history. Many writers have shown the strong relationship of entrepreneurship and economic development. Particularly in this era, economic literature pay special attention to the capacity of entrepreneurship in relation with social well-being and development ( González-Sánchez, 2012 ). But the links of economic development with the input of women entrepreneurs are yet to be explored in detail and the present study uniquely addresses this particular issue.

By considering the importance of women entrepreneurship, this study uses the data of 77 countries from female entrepreneurship index (FEI) 2015 report developed by global entrepreneurship and development institute (GEDI). Out of this selected sample of 77 countries for women entrepreneurship, the USA stands at first with score of 82.9 points out of 100. Australia ranked 2nd with score of 74.8, whereas UK, Denmark and Netherlands stood 3rd, 4th and 5th position with score of 70.6, 69.7 and 68.8, respectively. Out of total, 61% of countries still ranks below 50, which shows that in most of the regions of the world, women are still unprivileged and need societal support or infrastructure to grow as successful entrepreneurs. At macro level, risk for doing business has been decreased in these 77 countries and resources availability has been enhanced up to 13%, whereas tech transfer rate has been improved by 18% as an aggregate but unfortunately female entrepreneurs’ rate has only increased by 7%. So, there is dire need to dig out why the growing pace of women entrepreneurs is not congruent with other economic development measures. By associating the women entrepreneurship with other economic development estimators of globalization and gender inequality, this study uniquely contributes in the body of knowledge to measure the pace of economic development at global level.

Various studies ( Satar and Natasha, 2019 ; Shinnar et al. , 2018 ) have examined the entrepreneurial ventures irrespective of gender but ignored the share of female business women in the economy. Women entrepreneurship had also been addressed in some studies such as Amrita et al. (2018) and Guzman and Kacperczyk (2019) . Some used primary data, some used secondary data and other used both primary and secondary data, whereas some opted the case studies approach. But all these studies had been conducted at micro level or their scope was limited to some specific region of the world. This study has been conducted uniquely by using secondary data at global level. To associate women entrepreneurship with economic development this study used four composite indices: female entrepreneurship index, human development index, gender inequality index and globalization index.

The FEI has been used as a proxy of women entrepreneurship (WE), and human development index (HDI) has been used as a proxy of economic development. Major objective of this study is to measure the impact of women entrepreneurs on economic development around the globe. Along this main objective, the study also intended to measure the impact of globalization which is directly measured through GI and the impact of gender inequality which is directly measured through GII.

Literature review and hypotheses development

Women can be considered as the fastest growing entrepreneurs in the world ( Brush and Cooper, 2012 ; Patil and Deshpande, 2018 ). Now it is acknowledged that women entrepreneurship is an important indicator for world development. Women entrepreneurs play a significant role in producing jobs, wealth, poverty reduction, human development, education, health and nation’s development especially in developing countries. There are many success stories of women entrepreneurs which have been discussed in the literature and illustrated the main constraints on to their way ( Byrne et al. , 2019 ; Neumeyer et al. , 2019 ). Without women entrepreneurs, economies could not achieve the complete and sustainable success.

Suriyamurthi et al. (2009) highlighted the constraints of women entrepreneurs faced in developing economies. As they are important contributors to the expansion of the global economy, especially in low income and middle-income economies so, it is emphasized that they should collaborate with government and financial institutions to overcome these constraints. It has been urged that to tackle such obstacles, and it is crucial for female business owners to get recognized their identity which will ultimately impact on global economy. The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007 report is the fourth series of the reports on entrepreneurship which present an inclusive and up-to-date study on women role who occupied the world economy by entrepreneurial activities. Women are different from their male counter parts. They are more probable to share their achievements to others for both economic and noneconomic gains. Women are also important for sustainable development of the country because of they are much likely to share their gains to health, education and other resources with their family members and also with their communities at huge ( Orser et al. , 2006 ).

In developed nations, there are many aspects donating to increase women entrepreneurship such as self-fulfillment, creative skills, desire to independence, desire for wealth and power and social status ( Shah and Saurabh, 2015 ). On the other hand, in developing nations studies show that there are most cases in which self-employed women are pushed by economic and social conditions such as less income, poverty, widowing, high rate of unemployment and divorce problems, so they start their own business for fulfillment their basic needs or to support family. Despite above all, the success rate of women entrepreneurs are very low because of shortage of sufficient skills, relevant experience, training and education ( Farrukh et al. , 2018 ).

A number of scholars ( Bull and Willard, 1993 ; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000 ) tried their best to establish the theoretical base for entrepreneurship but still there is lack of generally accepted theory of entrepreneurship. There are two broader perspectives of theoretical foundations for entrepreneurship. First with respect to organization and the environment ( Bull and Willard, 1993 ) and other from individual perspective and the available opportunities ( Shane and Venkataraman, 2000 ). Apart from these two philosophical approaches, researchers from diverse disciplines such as anthropology, agriculture, education, economics, history, marketing, psychology and sociology have contributed in the existing body of knowledge of entrepreneurship. In spite of these diverse and richest contribution, there is still weakness in theorizing the entrepreneurial activities, as the researcher of one discipline may overlook the theoretical base of other discipline ( Bull and Willard, 1993 ). Although previous studies provide sufficient grounds for the development of entrepreneurial theoretical constructs, the field still lacks sufficient frameworks and emphasize researchers to pursue for the development of effective theories in a more aggressive way for entrepreneurs.

Women entrepreneurship and economic development

Women entrepreneurs around the globe have significant impact on the economic development, as the entrepreneurial ventures are creating new employment opportunities ( Akehurst et al. , 2012 ). Because of this increasing number of women entrepreneurs who are contributing in the economy, more and more scholars are focusing on women entrepreneurship in recent years ( Bullough et al. , 2015 ; Faisal et al. , 2017 ). Nafukho et al. (2004) emphasized the importance of human resources which is a major factor of economic development and helps in positive contribution of its growth. The proper utilization of manpower ensured the growth but in least developed countries major portion of women workforce is either unused or unnoticed which can be a barrier of development. This barrier can be overcome with the encouragement and providing resources to women to setup their own independent businesses ( Vinay and Singh, 2015 ).

There is positive relationship between women entrepreneurship and economic development.

Globalization and economic development

There is positive relationship between globalization and economic development.

Gender inequality and economic development

There is negative relationship between gender inequality and economic development.

The research model is shown in Figure 1 .

Research methodology

This study has been designed to analyze the impact of women entrepreneurship on economic development around the globe. Satar and Natasha (2019) highlighted that there is lack of suitable scale to measure entrepreneurial orientation. So, secondary data has been used to fulfill that purpose. Women entrepreneurship and economic development were the two major variables of this study, but other predictor variables, i.e. globalization and gender inequality of economic development, are also included in this study. Women entrepreneurship has been measured by FEI report of 2015 from GEDI. Economic development, which is dependent variable, has been measured through HDI. GII has been measured from Gini coefficient, whereas globalization has been measured from KOF index 2015. The study is cross-sectional in nature, as the data about women entrepreneurs are available only for the year of 2015.

Sample design

Data has been accessed from GEDI for FEI 2015 from United Nations Development Program for HDI and GII 2015, whereas the data for globalization of 2015 has been accessed from KOF Swiss Economic institute. The data has been accessed for 69 countries from all over the world. Unit of analysis is at country level. The year 2015 has been selected because the data for female entrepreneurs is only available for the year 2015.

Target population

In this study, target population are female entrepreneurs from the different countries of the world. Secondary data consisting of the 69 countries out of 77 for the year 2015 were included in the study from the female entrepreneurship report of GEDI which is a comprehensive report of female entrepreneurs of the selected countries of the world.

Data collection method

Data have been used for four different variables. These variables are economic development, women entrepreneurship, globalization and gender inequality. To measure the impact of women entrepreneurship on economic development, information about women entrepreneurship and the economic condition from 69 countries of the world were accessed. The data was available only for single year 2015 for female entrepreneurs. Women entrepreneurship index is accessed via The 2015 Female Entrepreneurship Index Report of GEDI, whereas the economic development is measured through HDI ( Hou et al. , 2015 ). Similarly, GI is retrieved by KOF index report ( Dreher, 2006 ), whereas GII is accessed through Human Development Report 2015 as described by Ukhova (2015) .

Empirical results

Regression analysis.

The value of R-squared is 0.816 in Table 1 which shows that that gender inequality, GI and FEI have combined impact on HDI up to 82%. High value of regression shows the strong and positive relationship among predictors and observed dependent variable.

Negative coefficient of GII explains that there is negative relationship between dependent variable HDI and GII. These results support the null H3 and purport that if gender equality increases one point then the HDI will decrease 31 points. Significance of the variable has also been observed because of its p -value which is less than 0.05%.

Coefficient of GI is 0.0013 from which it is concluded that if GI increases for 1% then there will be increase of 0.13% in HDI. As the p -value of GI is 0.156 which is more than alpha of 0.05% so, it is concluded that GI is insignificant variable for the model and does not support the H2 . Coefficient of FEI is 0.002 which shows that FEI has positive impact on HDI; if FEI will increase then HDI will also increase because of FEI. As the p -value (0.001) of FEI is less than alpha of 0.05%,it is concluded that FEI is significant variable of this model. Based on these values, H1 is accepted.

Standardized coefficients in column 3 of Table 1 explain the order of importance of individual variables on the total output. The values showed that FEI contribution in the global economy is 33%, whereas the impact of globalization is only 16%. Gender inequality GII is negatively associated with growth in the economy with the contribution of 46%. The value of adjusted R square is 0.81 which shows the explanatory power of the suggested model. P -value of F -statistic is 0.000 that is less than (0.05) level of significance. Based on this value it can be safely said that overall, the model is significant and valid.

This study is designed to find the role of women entrepreneurship in economic development at global level. Cross-sectional data on 69 countries has been accessed worldwide. Regression analysis is used to analyze the impact of women entrepreneurship (FEI), GII and GI on economic development (HDI). FEI, GII and GI have been used as predictors of this study for HDI. Based on regression analysis and the value of R-square, suggested model explained 82% variation in economic development because of FEI, GII and GI. From this, the importance of women entrepreneurship for economic development can be explained. Adjusted R-square also explained that there is 81% variation in dependent variable (economic development) because of independent variables. Significance of the model is confirmed by F -statistic. So, it can be concluded that model of this study is significant. Based on these results, it has been concluded that women entrepreneurship is crucial and important for development. So, if any country wanted to boost up its economy, it should support the women to establish their own independent businesses.

It has been observed that the impact of women entrepreneurship on economic development is different in different countries because of their different level of developments and infrastructures but their productivity and economic contribution is dependent on the level of the country’s development and cultural norms. All countries of the world are differentiated to each other on their development level, economic infrastructure and social and cultural norms. Apart from these differentiations, the countries are categorized into developed and developing nations. This study identified and measured the role of women entrepreneurs for 69 countries of the world for both developed and developing nations. It has been observed that women are not only the essential part of economic development but also have the greater impact on social well-being ( Brush and Cooper, 2012 ). Women are responsible about more than 40% of the world’s workforce, even though they inclined to earn low as compared to men. The study purported that gender inequality is one of the most important hurdles in the way of women entrepreneurship. There are multilayered reasons for this discrimination and supported by Revenga and Shetty (2012) . The results of this study also proved that gender inequality have the negative impact on women entrepreneurship. Most of the time, women have low confidence and less likely to become entrepreneurs because of social status, family and cultural constraints. For example, there is abundance of dynamic human resources, exciting and natural properties or several investment and businesses potentials that women can enjoy ( Ihugba et al. , 2013 ), but most of them are still unprivileged in formal sectors because of family commitments, skills deficiencies and cultural and social constraints as indicated by Fapohunda (2012) .

In a nutshell, women entrepreneurs can mark their contribution as a significant tool to the economic development, social development and to the sustainable development of the world’s future. This contribution is in the terms of education, better health for societies and in all other areas in which people are able to groom themselves. In fact, successful women entrepreneurs play a model role for the future entrepreneurs of the world ( Al Mamun et al. , 2019 ). The results of this study illustrated the positive impact of women entrepreneurship on all economies of world including developed and developing nations. It is pertinent to note that motives of women entrepreneurs are different for developed and developing countries.

The study was initiated to measure the impact of women entrepreneurs on the global economy. To measure this objective three hypotheses were developed. Along with women entrepreneurs, two other hypotheses were also formulated. These were to measure the impact of globalization and gender inequality on economic development. Globalization found to have insignificant relationship with economic development for women entrepreneurs. In most of the regions of the world, local ethics and cultural values strictly define the roles of women toward working outside the territory and creating hurdles to twitch their ventures around the globe. So, apart from technical and financial expertise, women have to overcome the cultural and ethical barriers as well if they want to be successful. Gender inequality found to have significant but reverse relationship with the economic development. The more the differentiation between males and females, the less development in economy. The effect of such gender imbalances can be reduced by improving the collective understanding of the society about gender roles and clear policies of gender equality from governments. Empirical results supported all three hypotheses of this study, and it is concluded that there is positive and significant role of women entrepreneurs in the global economy.

This study uniquely addresses the contribution of women entrepreneurs in the world economy which is still an unseen but a powerful benefactor of development. Most of the previous studies focused on micro level by focusing the entrepreneurship in general ( Bhattacharyya and Kumar, 2020 ) or specifically for female entrepreneurs ( Sidratulmunthah et al. , 2018 ). These studies used the primary data, and their main focus was to address the antecedents of entrepreneurship in the context of educational institutions. The underlying study contributed in the body of knowledge by addressing the actual contribution of female entrepreneurs in the world economy at macro level. Along with contributions of women entrepreneurs, this study also addressed the influence of globalization and gender imbalances in the world economy for women entrepreneurs.

Research model

Regression analysis table

Acs , Z.J. , Desai , S. and Hessels , J. ( 2008 ), “ Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 31 No. 3 , pp. 219 - 234 .

Akehurst , G. , Simarro , E. and Mas-Tur , A. ( 2012 ), “ Women entrepreneurship in small service firms: motivations, barriers and performance ”, The Service Industries Journal , Vol. 32 No. 15 , pp. 2489 - 2505 .

Al Mamun , A. , Fazal , S.A. and Muniady , R. ( 2019 ), “ Entrepreneurial knowledge, skills, competencies and performance: a study of micro-enterprises in Kelantan, Malaysia ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 13 No. 1 , pp. 29 - 48 .

Amrita , K. , Garg , C.P. and Singh , S. ( 2018 ), “ Modelling the critical success factors of women entrepreneurship using fuzzy AHP framework ”, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies , Vol. 10 No. 1 , pp. 81 - 116 .

Bhattacharyya , A. and Kumar , N. ( 2020 ), “ Who is more entrepreneurial? A comparative study of vocational and academic students ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 14 No. 1 , pp. 15 - 30 .

Boretos , G.P. ( 2009 ), “ The future of the global economy ”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change , Vol. 76 No. 3 , pp. 316 - 326 .

Brush , C.G. and Cooper , S.Y. ( 2012 ), “ Female entrepreneurship and economic development: an international perspective ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 24 Nos 1/2 , pp. 1 - 6 .

Bull , I. and Willard , G.E. ( 1993 ), “ Toward a theory of entrepreneurship ”, Journal of Business Venturing , Vol. 8 No. 3 , pp. 183 - 195 .

Bullough , A. , De Luque , M.S. , Abdelzaher , D. and Heim , W. ( 2015 ), “ Developing women leaders through entrepreneurship education and training ”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol. 29 No. 2 , pp. 250 - 270 .

Byrne , J. , Fattoum , S. and Diaz Garcia , M.C. ( 2019 ), “ Role models and women entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial superwoman has her say ”, Journal of Small Business Management , Vol. 57 No. 1 , pp. 154 - 184 .

Dreher , A. ( 2006 ), “ Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization ”, Applied Economics , Vol. 38 No. 10 , pp. 1091 - 1110 .

Faisal , M.N. , Jabeen , F. and I. Katsioloudes , M. ( 2017 ), “ Strategic interventions to improve women entrepreneurship in GCC countries: a relationship modeling approach ”, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies , Vol. 9 No. 2 , pp. 161 - 180 .

Fapohunda , T.M. ( 2012 ), “ Women and the informal sector in Nigeria: implications for development ”, British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences , Vol. 4 No. 1 , pp. 35 - 45 .

Farrukh , M. , Alzubi , Y. , Shahzad , I.A. , Waheed , A. and Kanwal , N. ( 2018 ), “ Entrepreneurial intentions: the role of personality traits in perspective of theory of planned behaviour ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 12 No. 3 , pp. 399 - 414 .

González-Sánchez , V.M. ( 2012 ), “ Miguel-Ángel Galindo and Domingo Ribeiro (Eds): women’s entrepreneurship and economics. New perspectives, practices and politics ”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , Vol. 8 No. 4 , pp. 499 - 503 .

Greene , P.G. , Brush , C.G. , Hart , M.M. and Saparito , P. ( 2001 ), “ Patterns of venture capital funding: is gender a factor? ”, Venture Capital , Vol. 3 No. 1 , pp. 63 - 83 .

Guzman , J. and Kacperczyk , A.O. ( 2019 ), “ Gender gap in entrepreneurship ”, Research Policy , Vol. 48 No. 7 , pp. 1666 - 1680 .

Hou , J. , Walsh , P.P. and Zhang , J. ( 2015 ), “ The dynamics of human development index ”, The Social Science Journal , Vol. 52 No. 3 , pp. 331 - 347 .

Ihugba , O.A. , Odii , A. and Njoku , A.C. ( 2013 ), “ Challenges and prospects of entrepreneurship in Nigeria ”, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies , Vol. 2 No. 5 , p. 25 .

Metcalfe , B.D. ( 2008 ), “ Women, management and globalization in the Middle East ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 83 No. 1 , pp. 85 - 100 .

Nafukho , F.M. , Hairston , N. and Brooks , K. ( 2004 ), “ Human capital theory: implications for human resource development ”, Human Resource Development International , Vol. 7 No. 4 , pp. 545 - 551 .

Neumeyer , X. , Santos , S.C. , Caetano , A. and Kalbfleisch , P. ( 2019 ), “ Entrepreneurship ecosystems and women entrepreneurs: a social capital and network approach ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 53 No. 2 , pp. 475 - 489 .

Nguyen , T.H. and Le , A.N.-H. ( 2019 ), “ Promoting creativity and innovation: expected and unexpected consequences ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 13 No. 3 , pp. 296 - 310 .

Orser , B.J. , Riding , A.L. and Manley , K. ( 2006 ), “ Women entrepreneurs and financial capital ”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , Vol. 30 No. 5 , pp. 643 - 665 .

Patil , P. and Deshpande , Y. ( 2018 ), “ Women entrepreneurship: a road ahead ”, International Journal of Economics, Business, and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 1 No. 1 , pp. 155 - 159 .

Revenga , A. and Shetty , S. ( 2012 ), “ Empowering women is smart economics-closing gender gaps benefits countries as a whole, not just women and girls ”, Finance and Development-English Edition , Vol. 49 No. 1 , p. 40 .

Satar , M.S. and Natasha , S. ( 2019 ), “ Individual social entrepreneurship orientation: toward development of a measurement scale ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 13 No. 1 , pp. 49 - 72 .

Shah , H. and Saurabh , P. ( 2015 ), “ Women entrepreneurs in developing nations: growth and replication strategies and their impact on poverty alleviation ”, Technology Innovation Management Review , Vol. 5 No. 8 , p. 34 .

Shane , S. and Venkataraman , S. ( 2000 ), “ The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research ”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 25 No. 1 , pp. 217 - 226 .

Shinnar , R.S. , Hsu , D.K. , Powell , B.C. and Zhou , H. ( 2018 ), “ Entrepreneurial intentions and start-ups: are women or men more likely to enact their intentions? ”, International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship , Vol. 36 No. 1 , pp. 60 - 80 .

Sidratulmunthah , Hussain , S. and Malik , M.I. ( 2018 ), “ Toward nurturing the entrepreneurial intentions of neglected female business students of Pakistan through proactive personality, self-efficacy and university support factors ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 12 No. 3 , pp. 363 - 378 .

Soriano , D.R. and Dobon , S.R. ( 2009 ), “ Linking globalization of entrepreneurship in small organizations ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 32 No. 3 , pp. 233 - 239 .

Suriyamurthi , S. , Sheela , S.C. and Rani , T.U. ( 2009 ), “ Globalization – challenges faced by women entrepreneurs ”, Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management , Vol. 2 No. 3 , pp. 34 - 39 .

Ukhova , D. ( 2015 ), “ Gender inequality and inter-household economic inequality in emerging economies: exploring the relationship ”, Gender and Development , Vol. 23 No. 2 , pp. 241 - 259 .

Ukpere , C.L. , Slabbert , A.D. and Ukpere , W.I. ( 2014 ), “ Rising trend in social media usage by women entrepreneurs across the globe to unlock their potentials for business success ”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences , Vol. 5 No. 10 , p. 551 .

Vinay , D. and Singh , D. ( 2015 ), “ Status and scope of women entrepreneurship ”, Universal Journal of Management , Vol. 3 No. 2 , pp. 43 - 51 .

Zanjirchi , S.M. , Jalilian , N. and Mehrjardi , M.S. ( 2019 ), “ Open innovation: from technology exploitation to creation of superior performance ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 13 No. 3 , pp. 326 - 340 .

Corresponding author

Related articles, we’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Entrepreneurship Development as a Tool for Employment Creation, Income Generation, and Poverty Reduction for the Youth and Women

• Published: 23 March 2024

Cite this article

• Abdijabbar Ismail Nor 1  

12 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Unemployment and poverty are global challenges, especially in emerging countries. In Somalia, both poverty and unemployment are major problems that are widespread among the youth who constitute more than 70% of the population. Despite the efforts to eradicate, both unemployment and poverty still remain major challenges in the country. Empirical studies have shown that entrepreneurship development plays an important role in socio-economic development. Therefore, this study aims to determine the contribution of entrepreneurship training and education, as well as SMEs’ development to job creation, income generation, and poverty reduction for the youth and women. The study applied a cross-sectional research design using a questionnaire to collect the data from a sample of 120 respondents from fresh graduates and other entrepreneurs who benefited from entrepreneurship training and education of the Next Economy Program provided by SIMAD Innovation Lab and ILO-SIYB Training packages as well as the entrepreneurship training programs provided by Irise-hub. The study applied partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypotheses through Smart-PLS (v.3.3.9). The study revealed that entrepreneurship training and education and SMEs’ development have a significant positive relationship with job creation, income generation, and poverty reduction. Therefore, the study findings have significant implications for entrepreneurs, entrepreneurial institutions, practitioners, and policymakers in entrepreneurship development. This study highlights the role of entrepreneurship development as a strategic tool for socio-economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Data Availability

The datasets of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abdullahi, A. M., Khelghat-Doost, H., & Hassan, M. S. (2021). Impact of small entrepreneurship development on poverty alleviation: Empirical study from Mogadishu, Somalia. Journal of Somali Studies, 8 , 33–51.

Article   Google Scholar  

Adebayo, N. A., & Nassar, M. L. (2014). Impact of micro and small business entrepreneurship on poverty reduction in Ibadan metropolis, South Western Nigeria. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3 (3), 1603–1626. www.irmbrjournal.com

Google Scholar  

Adofu and Ocheja (2013), Alleviating poverty through the use of entrepreneurship skill acquisition in Kogi State, Nigeria. International Open Journal of Economics Vol. 1, No. 2, PP: 14–23

Adenutsi, D. E. (2023). Entrepreneurship, job creation, income empowerment and poverty reduction in low-income economies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 13 (06), 1579–1598.

Agency, U. S., Development, I., International, M. C., Order, E. T., Learning, Y., Contract, A. I. D., & Government, U. S. (2020). USAID/Somalia youth assessment . 1(January).

Agri, E. M., Nanwul, D. A., & Acha, O. F. (2017). Promoting entrepreneurship for poverty reduction and sustainable development in Nigeria. Journal of Business Management and Economics, 8 (1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2009.7

Ajagbe, M. A., Fadeyi, O., Oke, A. O., & Isiavwe, D. T. (2015). Building Sustainable Future for Nigeria through Entrepreneurship, 5 (3), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-3/1740

Al-Haddad, L., Sial, M. S., Ali, I., Alam, R., Khuong, N. V., & Khanh, T. H. T. (2019). The role of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in employment generation and economic growth: A study of marble industry in emerging economy. International Journal of Financial Research, 10 (6), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n6p174

Anne, N. (2014). Factors affecting the performance of small and medium enterprises in the Jua Kali sector in Nakuru town, Kenya. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16 , 80–93.

Arenius, P. (2003) Women in entrepreneurship. Women in Entrepreneurship , April 2003 , 1–28.

Audretsch, D. (2012). Entrepreneurship research. Management Decision, 50 (5), 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227384

Bakhouche, A. (2022). Assessing the innovation-finance nexus for SMEs: Evidence from the Arab Region (MENA). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13 (3), 1875–1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00786-x

Bernstein, A. T., & Carayannis, E. G. (2012). Exploring the value proposition of the undergraduate entrepreneurship major and elective based on student self-efficacy and outcome expectations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3 (3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0041-z

Ben Slimane, S., M’henni, H, 2020, Entrepreneurship and development: Realities and future prospects, Published by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bhurtel, A. (2015). Technical and vocational education and training in workforce development. Journal of Training and Development, 1 (July), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.3126/jtd.v1i0.13094

Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Gender and entrepreneurship: An ethno- graphic approach . New York: Routledge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Cala, C., Arauzo-Carod, J.-M., & Manjon-Antolin, M. (2015). The determinants of entrepreneurship in developing countries. Departament D’Economia – Creip , 1–27.

Charles, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship development and entrepreneurial orientation in rural areas in Malawi. African Journal of Business Management, 9 (9), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm2014.7552

Cheng, M. Y., Chan, W. S., & Mahmood, A. (2009). The effectiveness of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia. Education and Training, 51 (7), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910910992754

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–358). Erlbaum.

Chineze, J., & J., Uche R., E., & Gabriel E., E. (2021). Effect of entrepreneurial education on unemployment reduction among students in Nigeria. Business and Management Research, 10 (2), 16. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v10n2p16

Chuma-Mkandawire, S. (2004, October 25–27). National Economic Consultative Forum. Report on the Policy Implementation Workshop for SMEs

Collier, P. (2007). Poverty reduction in Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104 (43), 16763–16768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611702104

Dilger, R. J. (2020). Small business administration and job creation (updated). Key Congressional Reports for September 2019: Part VII , 95–127.

do Adro, F., Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., & Kraus, S. (2021). Social entrepreneurship orientation and performance in non-profit organizations. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17 (4), 1591–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00748-4

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles . New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

European Commission. (2020). Social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe. Comparative synthesis report. Authors: Carlo Borzaga, Giulia Galera, Barbara Franchini, Stefania Chiomento, Rocío Nogales and Chiara Carini. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at https://europa.eu/!Qq64ny

Etuk, R. U., Etuk, G. R., & Michael, B. (2014). Small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) and Nigeria’s economic development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (7), 656–662. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n7p656

Ezeani, N. S. (2012). The teacher and skills acquisition at business education curriculum at university level in Nigeria. International Journal of Ghana, 3 (1), 30–33.

Fernández-Guadaño, J., & Diez, R. M. (2023). Social entrepreneurship impact in ten EU countries with supportive regulations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 0123456789 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01513-4

Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61 (1), 101–107.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. In Springer .

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26 (2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116 (1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382

Hussain, M. D., Bhuiyan, A. B., & Bakar, R. (2014). Entrepreneurship development and poverty alleviation: An empirical review. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 4 (410), 558–573. http://www.aessweb.com/journals/5003

Ifeoma, A. R., Purity, N. O., & Yusuf, A. E. (2018). Effect of entrepreneurship development on poverty alleviation in Nigeria.  Journal of Business and Management ,  20 (2), 80-87.

ILO. (2012). Youth employment interventions in Africa: A mapping report of the employment and labour sub-cluster of the regional coordination mechanism (RCM) for Africa .

ILO. (2021). Global employment trends for youth 2020: Africa. Extract , 4–6. Index, H. D. (2016). The ILO in Somalia and decent work . January , 16.

Jwasshaka, S. K., & Fadila, N. (2020). Minimizing unemployment of graduates through technical education and Training: Meta-analysis approach in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10 (2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i2/6858

Kastelli, I., Siokas, G., & Tsakanikas, A. (2023). Entrepreneurial absorptive capacity as enabler of knowledge intensive entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation. In Journal of the Knowledge Economy (Issue 0123456789). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01465-9

Kenya National Youth Policy. (2012). Ministry of Home Affairs, Heritage and Sports. Available at: http://www.africanchildforum.org/clr/policy%20per%20country/kenya/kenya_youth_2012_en.pdf .

Kilele, A.K.M. (2008). Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). Kenya facts and figures 2008 Available at http://www.knbs.or.ke/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=category&id=20&Itemid=1107 . Accessed:2015–10–01.

Kusa, R., Duda, J., & Suder, M. (2021). Explaining SME performance with fsQCA: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneur motivation, and opportunity perception. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6 (4), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.06.001

Makatiani, A. (2006). South African SMEs face challenge and opportunity in 2006. Retrieved from http://www.amso.org/resource/article/South/20African/20SMEs/20face/20challenge/20and/opportunity/20in/202006 . Accessed in 2021–08–01

Mamo, W. B. (2023). Growth determinants of micro and small enterprises (MSEs): Evidence from entrepreneurs in the Eastern Region of Ethiopia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14 (1), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00859-x

Manley, S. C., Hair, J. F., Williams, R. I., & McDowell, W. C. (2021). Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17 (4), 1805–1825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00687-6

Manzoor, F., Wei, L., & Sahito, N. (2021). The role of SMEs in rural development: Access of SMEs to finance as a mediator. PLoS ONE , 16 (3 March 2021), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247598 .

Maow, B. A. (2021). Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin (KOBİ’ler) Somali’deki Ekonomik Büyüme ve İstihdam Yaratılmasına Etkisi. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Economic Policy Researches , 8 (1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.26650/jepr818861

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society . Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

Miço, H., & Cungu, J. (2023). Entrepreneurship education, a challenging learning process towards entrepreneurial competence in education. Administrative Sciences , 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010022

Mitra, J., Abubakar, Y. A., & Sagagi, M. (2011). Knowledge creation and human capital for development: the role of graduate entrepreneurship. Education+ Training, 53 (5), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911111147758

Misango, S. B., & Ongiti, O. K. (2013). Do women entrepreneurs play a role in reducing poverty? A case in Kenya. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2 (1), 87.

Mohd Shariff, M. N., Peou, C., & Ali, J. (2010). Moderating effect of government policy on entrepreneurship and growth performance of small-medium enterprises in Cambodia.  International Journal of Business and Management Science ,  3 (1), 57-72.

Nor, A. I. (2021). Alleviating Poverty through Youth and Women Entrepreneurship Developments, 13 (11), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.7176/EJBM/13-11-05

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Nwachukwu, O. P. (2014). Poverty reduction through technical and vocational education and training (TVET) in Nigeria. Developing Country Studies , 4 (14), 10–14. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/DCS/article/viewFile/14053/14361 .

NYP, S. (2017). The National Youth Policy of The Federal Government of Somalia (pp. 1–31).

Ogidi, E. J., & Okonkwo, C. C. (2021). Entrepreneurial development and poverty reduction in Jos North Local Government Area, Plateau State. African Journal of Business and Economic … , 1 (7), 45–56. https://www.ijaar.org/articles/ajbed/v1n7/ajbed-v1n7-Jul21-p1726.pdf

Ogundele, O. J. K., Akingbade, W. A., & Akinlabi, H. B. (2012). Entrepreneurship training and education as strategic tools for poverty alleviation in Nigeria. American International Journal of ContemporaryResearch, 2 (1), 148–156.

Okereke, H. K., & Okorafor, M. O. (2011). Entrepreneurship in education concepts and constraints. African Journal of Education and Development Studies, 4 (1), 196–207.

Olaniyan, D. A., & Okemakinde, T. (2008). Human capital theory: Implications for educational development. European Journal of Scientific Research, 24 (2), 157–162.

Olayinka, I., Olusegun, A. K., & Babatunde, S. J. (2015). Entrepreneurship and Poverty Reduction in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis, 17 (3), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-

Omogbolahan, A. S. (2012). Entrepreneurial education as a tool for reducing unemployment in Nigeria (Vol. 12, pp. 5690–5699). 5th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (Iceri 2012).

Patricio, Lurdes D. (2023). Aligning entrepreneurial universities’ HE Innovate dimensions with entrepreneurs’ needs: A graduate entrepreneur-centered perspective. The International Journal of Management Education . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100882

Robert, B. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 106 (2), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943

Sambo, W. (2016a). Factors affecting youth entrepreneurship development within Kibera, Kenya: The perspective of entrepreneurship education. Problems and Perspectives in Management , 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.14(2-2).2016.09 .

Sambo, W. (2016b). Factors affecting youth entrepreneurship development within Kibera, Kenya: The perspective of entrepreneurship education. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14 (2–2), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.14(2-2).2016.09

Semegn, A. A., & Bishnoi, N. K. (2021). Analysis of effect of microfinance on the performance of MSEs in Amhara National Regional State. Ethiopia. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30 (1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355720974822

Simiyu, J. (2010). Entrepreneurship education as a tool to support self-employment in Kenya . the UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.

Simpeh, K. N. (2011). Entrepreneurship theories and empirical research: A summary review of the literature. European Journal of Business and Management, 3 (6), 1–9.

Singer, A. E. (2006). Business strategy and poverty alleviation. Journal of Business Ethics, 66 , 225–231.

Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36 (2), 111–147.

Ugoani, J., & Ibeenwo, G. (2015). Entrepreneurship development and employment generation in Nigeria: A study of the national directorate of employment.  Independent Journal of Management & Production (Ijm&P) ,  6 (3).  https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v6i3.308 .

World Bank. (2002). Socio Economic Survey . 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA.

World Bank. (2016). Socio economic survey. Somali poverty profile . NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/28470

Yadav, V., & Unni, J. (2016). Women entrepreneurship: Research review and future directions. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research , 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-016-0055-x

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Somali National University, Mogadishu, Somalia

Abdijabbar Ismail Nor

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdijabbar Ismail Nor .

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval.

Thi s article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Nor, A.I. Entrepreneurship Development as a Tool for Employment Creation, Income Generation, and Poverty Reduction for the Youth and Women. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01747-w

Download citation

Received : 12 October 2022

Accepted : 11 January 2024

Published : 23 March 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01747-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Entrepreneurship training and education
• Job creation
• Income generation
• Poverty reduction
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Manufacturing
• New to the Street
• On the Move
• Real Estate
• Tech and Design
• Business License Reports

Konduros named CEO of Greenville’s economic development arm

• March 19, 2024

The city of Greenville named Sam Konduros to serve as the inaugural president and CEO of the corporation created to handle the city’s economic development efforts.

Konduros will helm the Greenville City Economic Development Corporation and brings to the role extensive experience in the economic development field. He  previously served as president and CEO of SCBio , the leading advocacy and economic development organization for the state’s life sciences industry.

He also served as president and CEO of Upstate SC Alliance , a regional economic development organization focused on the 10 counties of the Upstate.

Konduros will start April 22 and said he plans to focus on making the most out of his first 100 days on the job.

“I do plan to jump in with both feet with the existing team,” he said.

He added he is grateful for the opportunity and energized by the city’s continued economic growth and central role in a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Mayor Knox White said Konduros brings a wealth of institutional knowledge and extensive web of relationships to the role.

GCEDC was created in June 2021 as a 501(c)3 and charged with executing the city’s economic development strategic plan.

Key areas of focus will be real estate and property development, small and minority business recruitment, investor relations and marketing, among others.

Related Topics

United Community headquarters opens in downtown Greenville

• Megan Fitzgerald
• March 12, 2024

Visit Anderson rebrand emphasizes natural, geographic advantages

• Tiare-Leiana Solis
• March 20, 2024

Subscribe now to our newsletter

You May Also Like

NEXT announces rebrand, tightened focus

• February 8, 2024

Greenville-based Global Location Strategies opens office in Amsterdam

• February 7, 2024

Upstate’s role in Atlanta-Charlotte economic zone continues to expand

• February 2, 2024

Recession fears wane as economic outlook slowly improves

• February 1, 2024

Ten at the Top biannual summit returns Sept. 11 with focus on future

• January 31, 2024

City Profile: Woodruff

• January 28, 2024

City profile: Easley

• January 24, 2024

Input your search keywords and press Enter.